<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hollywood&#8217;s Favorite Sleazeball Shutterbug</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/michellemalkin/hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/michellemalkin/hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 03:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: laura r</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/michellemalkin/hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug/comment-page-1/#comment-5323933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laura r]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2013 01:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210911#comment-5323933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@one time vogue/bazaar were creme de la creme. i was thrilled when i had a chance to work some of the editors as an fashion asst. yes anna wintour did kill it. i prefer diana vreeland &amp; the others. they jazzed things up but still had class. i dont read these mags, only town &amp; country, i like beautiful photos. i dont like to see a girl w/a shaven head in a $200,000 usd evening gown w/sneakers &amp; she is posing like a guy. this started in the late 80s or early 90s.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@one time vogue/bazaar were creme de la creme. i was thrilled when i had a chance to work some of the editors as an fashion asst. yes anna wintour did kill it. i prefer diana vreeland &amp; the others. they jazzed things up but still had class. i dont read these mags, only town &amp; country, i like beautiful photos. i dont like to see a girl w/a shaven head in a $200,000 usd evening gown w/sneakers &amp; she is posing like a guy. this started in the late 80s or early 90s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russell owl</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/michellemalkin/hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug/comment-page-1/#comment-5323858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[russell owl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210911#comment-5323858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HE IS NOT THE reason these companies are making money.  His work is just pervy and trite., its that the trends are shoved in our face by the media and no alternative is allowed to surface.  People magazine is the victomclass rag, each victim class carefully covered in each issue and all the terry richardson hollywood all seeing eye types.  they promote what is toxic in a closing circle. Time, vogue, people.... W magazine will not work with him. they are much more respected than Vogue in the fashion world. Vogue has become the celebrity pusher that Harpers also is, both devoted more to prog politics and celebrity Richardson victims and layouts that subvert womans beauty into clownish perverted and dystopian gulag slaves.
take a look.  fashion is dead except for the elite and a stronghold of middle class.  Wintour has killed it.  the devil wears more than prada.  cultural pessimism contributor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HE IS NOT THE reason these companies are making money.  His work is just pervy and trite., its that the trends are shoved in our face by the media and no alternative is allowed to surface.  People magazine is the victomclass rag, each victim class carefully covered in each issue and all the terry richardson hollywood all seeing eye types.  they promote what is toxic in a closing circle. Time, vogue, people&#8230;. W magazine will not work with him. they are much more respected than Vogue in the fashion world. Vogue has become the celebrity pusher that Harpers also is, both devoted more to prog politics and celebrity Richardson victims and layouts that subvert womans beauty into clownish perverted and dystopian gulag slaves.<br />
take a look.  fashion is dead except for the elite and a stronghold of middle class.  Wintour has killed it.  the devil wears more than prada.  cultural pessimism contributor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russell owl</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/michellemalkin/hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug/comment-page-1/#comment-5323853</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[russell owl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210911#comment-5323853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[so does this give all men a PASS for sexual harrassment in the workplace in the eyes of the feminists and or the law?
 Are men now allowed to breath a sigh of relief in the offices around the country when the gal he likes decides to press charges because he smiled at her a lot?  sensativity training is only for corporat wogs, not the mixed up minions of media.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so does this give all men a PASS for sexual harrassment in the workplace in the eyes of the feminists and or the law?<br />
 Are men now allowed to breath a sigh of relief in the offices around the country when the gal he likes decides to press charges because he smiled at her a lot?  sensativity training is only for corporat wogs, not the mixed up minions of media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russell owl</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/michellemalkin/hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug/comment-page-1/#comment-5323851</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[russell owl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210911#comment-5323851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yes,others have binders full of perverts and predators]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes,others have binders full of perverts and predators</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marliii</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/michellemalkin/hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug/comment-page-1/#comment-5320407</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marliii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2013 18:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210911#comment-5320407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My Uncle Hayden got a stunning metallic Cadillac CTS-V Wagon just by some parttime working online with a laptop. visit this website 9­­­­­­­­­m­­­­­­­­­s­­­­­­­­­n­­­­­­­­­.d­­­­­­­­­d­­­­­­­­­p­­­­­­­­­.­­­­­­­­­n­­­­­­­­­e­­­­­­­­­t­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Uncle Hayden got a stunning metallic Cadillac CTS-V Wagon just by some parttime working online with a laptop. visit this website 9­­­­­­­­­m­­­­­­­­­s­­­­­­­­­n­­­­­­­­­.d­­­­­­­­­d­­­­­­­­­p­­­­­­­­­.­­­­­­­­­n­­­­­­­­­e­­­­­­­­­t­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laura r</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/michellemalkin/hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug/comment-page-1/#comment-5332547</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laura r]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210911#comment-5332547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[again it starts in the home. unfortunatly there is little difference between porn &amp; art galleries exibits. the advertisemenst are almost porn as well. what i am saying is that you cant control global corps, they ARE the sewer. being a libertarian i believe in personal freedom, as long as it doesnt infringe on other people. i do think there should be restrictions on where these advertisements can appear, like bill boards can be offensive. the whole society has degenerated. i dont just mean younger girls, but all ages. there are millions of people walking around in what looks like underwear &amp; pajamas, 30s, middle aged &amp; elderly. flashing their fat ugly &amp;old bodies in public. (while screaming on cell phones, &amp; stuffing their faces). there is little differerce in white slovenly america &amp; ghetto. the average person looks like a bum in the street. there is no dignity, or dress code. this is all races, lowerclass, lower middle, middle &amp; beyound. youre correct, we are in a sewer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>again it starts in the home. unfortunatly there is little difference between porn &amp; art galleries exibits. the advertisemenst are almost porn as well. what i am saying is that you cant control global corps, they ARE the sewer. being a libertarian i believe in personal freedom, as long as it doesnt infringe on other people. i do think there should be restrictions on where these advertisements can appear, like bill boards can be offensive. the whole society has degenerated. i dont just mean younger girls, but all ages. there are millions of people walking around in what looks like underwear &amp; pajamas, 30s, middle aged &amp; elderly. flashing their fat ugly &amp;old bodies in public. (while screaming on cell phones, &amp; stuffing their faces). there is little differerce in white slovenly america &amp; ghetto. the average person looks like a bum in the street. there is no dignity, or dress code. this is all races, lowerclass, lower middle, middle &amp; beyound. youre correct, we are in a sewer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laura r</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/michellemalkin/hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug/comment-page-1/#comment-5315238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laura r]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210911#comment-5315238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i dont think american apparels customers will boycott. they like the product too much. as for walmart, i cant imagine the average person living w/out it. i think its a disgusting place, i dont go to these kind of envirements.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont think american apparels customers will boycott. they like the product too much. as for walmart, i cant imagine the average person living w/out it. i think its a disgusting place, i dont go to these kind of envirements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laura r</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/michellemalkin/hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug/comment-page-1/#comment-5332535</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laura r]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210911#comment-5332535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i dont think american apparels customers will boycott. they like the product too much. as for walmart, i cant imagine the average person living w/out it. i think its a disgusting place, i dont go to these kind of envirements.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont think american apparels customers will boycott. they like the product too much. as for walmart, i cant imagine the average person living w/out it. i think its a disgusting place, i dont go to these kind of envirements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocky Mountain</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/michellemalkin/hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug/comment-page-1/#comment-5315135</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rocky Mountain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210911#comment-5315135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laura, I think the combination of Libertarians and women or girls is not a healthy one.  Of course there are trashy, vulgar, far right types who have long ago roared past the conservative starting gate I just don&#039;t want girls or women to be tempted by the trashy or vulgar part because if all go down that road all we&#039;ve got left is a sewer and we may be there all ready.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura, I think the combination of Libertarians and women or girls is not a healthy one.  Of course there are trashy, vulgar, far right types who have long ago roared past the conservative starting gate I just don&#8217;t want girls or women to be tempted by the trashy or vulgar part because if all go down that road all we&#8217;ve got left is a sewer and we may be there all ready.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/michellemalkin/hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug/comment-page-1/#comment-5315105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 02:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210911#comment-5315105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like I&#039;m going to have to turn in my conservative/libertarian credentials. I, in the past bought a Gaga book, photographed by Richardson. Yes it was riske&#039;, but in the past I had a crush on Gaga, untill she went to sing at Obama&#039;s reelection party. Then I started deleting pics of her. Saw on You Tube that Richardson had been taking pics of Amy Winehouse with her boyfriend Blake there. If he started with Amy, Blake would have punched his lights out (if he wasn&#039;t too stoned) for Blake later was put in jail for 15 months, punching out a bar tender.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like I&#8217;m going to have to turn in my conservative/libertarian credentials. I, in the past bought a Gaga book, photographed by Richardson. Yes it was riske&#8217;, but in the past I had a crush on Gaga, untill she went to sing at Obama&#8217;s reelection party. Then I started deleting pics of her. Saw on You Tube that Richardson had been taking pics of Amy Winehouse with her boyfriend Blake there. If he started with Amy, Blake would have punched his lights out (if he wasn&#8217;t too stoned) for Blake later was put in jail for 15 months, punching out a bar tender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/michellemalkin/hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug/comment-page-1/#comment-5315101</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 01:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210911#comment-5315101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richardson also photographed Amy Winehouse, but she did not strip for him, Maybe because her boyfriend Blake was there.You can see that on youtube.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richardson also photographed Amy Winehouse, but she did not strip for him, Maybe because her boyfriend Blake was there.You can see that on youtube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laura r</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/michellemalkin/hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug/comment-page-1/#comment-5314887</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laura r]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210911#comment-5314887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[its worse than this artical even reports. go to &quot;celebrity life&quot; nov. 5th. in the past the worst that ever happened w/a fashion or commercial photographer was he may make a pass @the model. that was it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its worse than this artical even reports. go to &#8220;celebrity life&#8221; nov. 5th. in the past the worst that ever happened w/a fashion or commercial photographer was he may make a pass @the model. that was it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pat roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/michellemalkin/hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug/comment-page-1/#comment-5314709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pat roberts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 07:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210911#comment-5314709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder if Michelle Malkin would resist the temptation of dropping her top, bottom, dress in front of dirty, filthy Richardson, when asked to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Michelle Malkin would resist the temptation of dropping her top, bottom, dress in front of dirty, filthy Richardson, when asked to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlene</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/michellemalkin/hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug/comment-page-1/#comment-5314703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlene]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 06:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210911#comment-5314703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Im making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do.....

▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jobs81.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.jobs81.com&lt;/a&gt;

▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do&#8230;..</p>
<p>▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jobs81.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.jobs81.com</a></p>
<p>▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Z</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/michellemalkin/hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug/comment-page-1/#comment-5332420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Z]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 05:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210911#comment-5332420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You mentioned American Apparel. Several harassment suits filed so far.  Their website is close to soft p_rn and in one case is soft p_rn.But Dov Charney cares, so according to the left he is okay. He is on board with GLAAD, PETA and pays his workers $12 an hour in LA.  I do not see how that is a livable wage in LA.

****
You can touch anyone. Walmart is the largest retailer.  There numbers are down.  I think it is due to the economy and they have grown to the limit of their environment.  Plus people like &quot;Howard Prescott&quot; eventually find their way into any big organization (IMHO).  Point is a boycott might work even for the largest of companies/retailers.  Depressing their earning, earning growth or stock price might be enough to make a board cave.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mentioned American Apparel. Several harassment suits filed so far.  Their website is close to soft p_rn and in one case is soft p_rn.But Dov Charney cares, so according to the left he is okay. He is on board with GLAAD, PETA and pays his workers $12 an hour in LA.  I do not see how that is a livable wage in LA.</p>
<p>****<br />
You can touch anyone. Walmart is the largest retailer.  There numbers are down.  I think it is due to the economy and they have grown to the limit of their environment.  Plus people like &#8220;Howard Prescott&#8221; eventually find their way into any big organization (IMHO).  Point is a boycott might work even for the largest of companies/retailers.  Depressing their earning, earning growth or stock price might be enough to make a board cave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laura r</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/michellemalkin/hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug/comment-page-1/#comment-5332418</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laura r]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 03:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210911#comment-5332418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[many of these big clothing comps are owned by corps like proctor &amp; gamble. we are talking about global billions. douteful they would want to change things way on the top. right now the porn violence blood gay shock approach is working. i saw the american apparel websight several yrs ago. it looked like the old fredriks of hollywood. (owner is also a lecher). havnt bought fashion mags in a few yrs. the only fashion/life style mag left is &quot;town &amp; country&quot;. the others have stooped to articals (we are talking mags like harpers bazaar) like: &quot;what puff daddy wants to see on a women&quot; (like i care about his fashion advice). then again he has a clothing line. guess he also paid for advertising pages. corps follow the $$.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>many of these big clothing comps are owned by corps like proctor &amp; gamble. we are talking about global billions. douteful they would want to change things way on the top. right now the porn violence blood gay shock approach is working. i saw the american apparel websight several yrs ago. it looked like the old fredriks of hollywood. (owner is also a lecher). havnt bought fashion mags in a few yrs. the only fashion/life style mag left is &#8220;town &amp; country&#8221;. the others have stooped to articals (we are talking mags like harpers bazaar) like: &#8220;what puff daddy wants to see on a women&#8221; (like i care about his fashion advice). then again he has a clothing line. guess he also paid for advertising pages. corps follow the $$.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cacslewisfan</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/michellemalkin/hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug/comment-page-1/#comment-5314587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cacslewisfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210911#comment-5314587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More proof that modern Feminism = Daddy Issues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More proof that modern Feminism = Daddy Issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everett Vulgamore</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/michellemalkin/hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug/comment-page-1/#comment-5314582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Everett Vulgamore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210911#comment-5314582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[for that last part, i believe they dont need a brain transplant, but a quick injection of lead in their forehead]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for that last part, i believe they dont need a brain transplant, but a quick injection of lead in their forehead</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everett Vulgamore</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/michellemalkin/hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug/comment-page-1/#comment-5314580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Everett Vulgamore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210911#comment-5314580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[why am i not surprised that this is liberal-related and it has a good old fashioned double standard?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why am i not surprised that this is liberal-related and it has a good old fashioned double standard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laura r</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/michellemalkin/hollywoods-favorite-sleazeball-shutterbug/comment-page-1/#comment-5332412</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laura r]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210911#comment-5332412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[his fathers photo work was beautiful, the blk/wht fashion in the 1960s. i remember it well. i just caught up w/terrys work, go to CELEBRITY LIFE  nov 5th. though i heard of his name, i wasnt familar w/the work. looks like he just lost a major client H&amp;M. understand he has worked on major campaigns for very high end fashion comps as well. there has been many new millionares since say yr 2000. most of them are tasteless &amp; tacky. that also transformed the fashion industry, the retail stores etc. it changed manufacturing as well. the refined classy approach took a back seat to vulgar style wize. that is why so many of the ads are the way they are, also a decline in morality in the entire world. the entire industry knows about him, no need to protect anyone. hes making so much $ for his clients that it seems that losing a few accts wont take him down. many of the girls just accept this as normal, even ones who dont need the $, &amp; are very sophicated like demi moores daughter. she wouldnt do a sex actw/him, but she posed for him anyway. why? i will tell you why, dirty talk is acceptable. if dozens of girls &amp; celebrities refused to work w/him then he may be fired. BUT since this porn photo approach is what sells, they will just hire someone else to take the photos. someone who has a hands off policy &amp; not a dirty mouth. the beat will go on in advertising, galleries etc. this is part of the world today. do you know the % of jr high school girls who send photos of their sex organs to boys? many. im not talking about ghetto schools either, i mean good public&amp; private schools. how many 12 yr old do oral sex w/the boys? again i dont mean the ghetto, i mean good schools. i was a student of advertising also photography, but this was way before this change. i see little difference between violent porn &amp; mainstream ads. richardsons work is technically ok, medicore compositions, its the content which excites the media. the uglier the better. getting rid of this paticular guy wont change the major trend in visuals &amp; selling techniques. sorry to say, there is too much $ wrapped up in these corps. big difference between this &amp; a talk show host.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>his fathers photo work was beautiful, the blk/wht fashion in the 1960s. i remember it well. i just caught up w/terrys work, go to CELEBRITY LIFE  nov 5th. though i heard of his name, i wasnt familar w/the work. looks like he just lost a major client H&amp;M. understand he has worked on major campaigns for very high end fashion comps as well. there has been many new millionares since say yr 2000. most of them are tasteless &amp; tacky. that also transformed the fashion industry, the retail stores etc. it changed manufacturing as well. the refined classy approach took a back seat to vulgar style wize. that is why so many of the ads are the way they are, also a decline in morality in the entire world. the entire industry knows about him, no need to protect anyone. hes making so much $ for his clients that it seems that losing a few accts wont take him down. many of the girls just accept this as normal, even ones who dont need the $, &amp; are very sophicated like demi moores daughter. she wouldnt do a sex actw/him, but she posed for him anyway. why? i will tell you why, dirty talk is acceptable. if dozens of girls &amp; celebrities refused to work w/him then he may be fired. BUT since this porn photo approach is what sells, they will just hire someone else to take the photos. someone who has a hands off policy &amp; not a dirty mouth. the beat will go on in advertising, galleries etc. this is part of the world today. do you know the % of jr high school girls who send photos of their sex organs to boys? many. im not talking about ghetto schools either, i mean good public&amp; private schools. how many 12 yr old do oral sex w/the boys? again i dont mean the ghetto, i mean good schools. i was a student of advertising also photography, but this was way before this change. i see little difference between violent porn &amp; mainstream ads. richardsons work is technically ok, medicore compositions, its the content which excites the media. the uglier the better. getting rid of this paticular guy wont change the major trend in visuals &amp; selling techniques. sorry to say, there is too much $ wrapped up in these corps. big difference between this &amp; a talk show host.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 700/727 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 22:18:45 by W3 Total Cache -->