<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New Cold War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/moorthy-muthuswamy/a-new-cold-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/moorthy-muthuswamy/a-new-cold-war/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-new-cold-war</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 23:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: continuum</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/moorthy-muthuswamy/a-new-cold-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4131458</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[continuum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172668#comment-4131458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shariah implementation works with top-down approach. Cut the head off and no more shariah. However, we still have a billion or so pissed off pisslamists who will be pissed off no matter what the kafir does to them and/or does not do to them. What is the solution? I have no idea, since the pisslamists won&#039;t be satisfied with anything, but martyrdom....so lets give all of them one... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shariah implementation works with top-down approach. Cut the head off and no more shariah. However, we still have a billion or so pissed off pisslamists who will be pissed off no matter what the kafir does to them and/or does not do to them. What is the solution? I have no idea, since the pisslamists won&#039;t be satisfied with anything, but martyrdom&#8230;.so lets give all of them one&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/moorthy-muthuswamy/a-new-cold-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4131088</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 08:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172668#comment-4131088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like this blog very much.I knew many important info from this blog. 
Keep up the good work  
&lt;a href=&quot;http://greenspointdental.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Greenspoint Dental - Houston&lt;/a&gt; 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this blog very much.I knew many important info from this blog.<br />
Keep up the good work<br />
<a href="http://greenspointdental.com/" rel="nofollow">Greenspoint Dental &#8211; Houston</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yoshi11</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/moorthy-muthuswamy/a-new-cold-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4130639</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yoshi11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 06:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172668#comment-4130639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good luck in expecting non-Moslems to tell Moslems how to practice their religion! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck in expecting non-Moslems to tell Moslems how to practice their religion! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Tarango</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/moorthy-muthuswamy/a-new-cold-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4130412</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Tarango]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 05:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172668#comment-4130412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bible says the 3 antichrist will come at us from the East. 1 from the dragon which is the symbol of China. 1 from the beast which has to do with oil and gold Russia. 1 from the false prophet which is muhammad/islam Iran. The 3 have political interest and agreements with each other against us. It&#039;s gonna get real crazy real soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bible says the 3 antichrist will come at us from the East. 1 from the dragon which is the symbol of China. 1 from the beast which has to do with oil and gold Russia. 1 from the false prophet which is muhammad/islam Iran. The 3 have political interest and agreements with each other against us. It&#8217;s gonna get real crazy real soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moorthy Muthuswamy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/moorthy-muthuswamy/a-new-cold-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4129155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moorthy Muthuswamy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 23:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172668#comment-4129155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think we all are giving too much respect to these ancient Islamic doctrines (including sharia law) by associating them with coherence and clarity. Yes, there is some clarity with sharia law and, when it does, it has some dangerous implications (I never said sharia is not dangerous, unless you assumed otherwise). 
 
My point is that, by and large, sharia is not a law in the modern sense, because it is vague and imprecise. That&#8217;s a very powerful point, as it suggests that it couldn&#8217;t be God&#8217;s law. We ought to make every effort to propagate this view in order that Muslims themselves take sharia less seriously, like we do. We have yet to deploy such a technique;that doesn&#8217;t mean, we wouldn&#8217;t, in future. 
 
I think you are missing the point that if Islamic law itself is taken less seriously by an influential section of the Muslim society (such as the educated Muslims), they will be less inclined to be dictated by it and likely, not allow a minority to impose sharia on the community.   
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we all are giving too much respect to these ancient Islamic doctrines (including sharia law) by associating them with coherence and clarity. Yes, there is some clarity with sharia law and, when it does, it has some dangerous implications (I never said sharia is not dangerous, unless you assumed otherwise). </p>
<p>My point is that, by and large, sharia is not a law in the modern sense, because it is vague and imprecise. That&rsquo;s a very powerful point, as it suggests that it couldn&rsquo;t be God&rsquo;s law. We ought to make every effort to propagate this view in order that Muslims themselves take sharia less seriously, like we do. We have yet to deploy such a technique;that doesn&rsquo;t mean, we wouldn&rsquo;t, in future. </p>
<p>I think you are missing the point that if Islamic law itself is taken less seriously by an influential section of the Muslim society (such as the educated Muslims), they will be less inclined to be dictated by it and likely, not allow a minority to impose sharia on the community.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghostwriter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/moorthy-muthuswamy/a-new-cold-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4129104</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghostwriter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 22:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172668#comment-4129104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sadly,Mr. Muthuswamy hasn&#039;t seen the photos and news footage of Muslims screaming for the deaths of Americans. How is anyone required to make peace with people like that? 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly,Mr. Muthuswamy hasn&#039;t seen the photos and news footage of Muslims screaming for the deaths of Americans. How is anyone required to make peace with people like that? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g_jochnowitz</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/moorthy-muthuswamy/a-new-cold-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4128954</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[g_jochnowitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 22:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172668#comment-4128954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Islam is becoming ever more religious.  Headscarves have taken over.  There was a time when women at universities didn&#039;t wear them.  Now they do.  There was a time when most Muslims had no interest in becoming suicide bombers or in dying in a jihad. Perhaps most still do not, but death has a greater appeal in the Islamic world than it has had for a century.  
Marxism is an atheistic doctrine.  Nevertheless, it demands faith.  North Korea, the remaining country on earth committed to blind faith in Marxism, is a place where the people truly love the Kim Dynasty, despite the fact that it has caused permanent famine.  
Leftists in Europe and America are not exactly Marxists, but they do have blind faith.  Their faith teaches them that opposing Israel takes precedence over all other issues.  It has led to crazy results, such as the de facto support by gay-rights and women&#039;s-rights groups for Islam.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jochnowitz.net/Essays/NorthKorea.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.jochnowitz.net/Essays/NorthKorea.html&lt;/a&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Islam is becoming ever more religious.  Headscarves have taken over.  There was a time when women at universities didn&#039;t wear them.  Now they do.  There was a time when most Muslims had no interest in becoming suicide bombers or in dying in a jihad. Perhaps most still do not, but death has a greater appeal in the Islamic world than it has had for a century.<br />
Marxism is an atheistic doctrine.  Nevertheless, it demands faith.  North Korea, the remaining country on earth committed to blind faith in Marxism, is a place where the people truly love the Kim Dynasty, despite the fact that it has caused permanent famine.<br />
Leftists in Europe and America are not exactly Marxists, but they do have blind faith.  Their faith teaches them that opposing Israel takes precedence over all other issues.  It has led to crazy results, such as the de facto support by gay-rights and women&#039;s-rights groups for Islam.  <a href="http://www.jochnowitz.net/Essays/NorthKorea.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.jochnowitz.net/Essays/NorthKorea.html</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yoshi11</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/moorthy-muthuswamy/a-new-cold-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4128923</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yoshi11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 21:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172668#comment-4128923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure, there is lots of vagueness and confusion in many areas of Sharia, but there is also considerable clarity, too. For example, sharia law is pretty clear about severely punishing blasphemy. Sharia law is also pretty clear on the necessity Moslems to make war on non-Moslems until Islamic law rules the world because that is what Allah so clearly said in the Koran, and that is what Muhammad so clearly said in his hadiths. Islamic law is very clear that the Christian belief in the divinity of Jesus is major shirk, the only sin which Allah will never pardon. Sharia law is clear that women are inferior to men, both morally and legally, because that is what the Koran says and that is what Muhammad said.  
For the sake of clarity, we need to distinguish between Islam, as a body of doctrines, and people who call themselves Muslims. There are many people who identify themselves as Muslims but who do not follow Islamic sacred law. That does not change Islamic law or the religious necessity of following it. It just says that some Moslems don&#039;t follow the laws of their religion. It was the same in Muhammad&#039;s time, as well. Even in the Koran, he had to admonish Moslems who did not want to go out and fight jihad.  
It is a big mistake to misrepresent the nature of Sharia law, as you are doing here, because the ignorant non-Moslem public will get the erroneous idea that Sharia law is not so dangerous and that we can all look forward to an Islam without it. That is a vain and dangerous hope.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, there is lots of vagueness and confusion in many areas of Sharia, but there is also considerable clarity, too. For example, sharia law is pretty clear about severely punishing blasphemy. Sharia law is also pretty clear on the necessity Moslems to make war on non-Moslems until Islamic law rules the world because that is what Allah so clearly said in the Koran, and that is what Muhammad so clearly said in his hadiths. Islamic law is very clear that the Christian belief in the divinity of Jesus is major shirk, the only sin which Allah will never pardon. Sharia law is clear that women are inferior to men, both morally and legally, because that is what the Koran says and that is what Muhammad said.<br />
For the sake of clarity, we need to distinguish between Islam, as a body of doctrines, and people who call themselves Muslims. There are many people who identify themselves as Muslims but who do not follow Islamic sacred law. That does not change Islamic law or the religious necessity of following it. It just says that some Moslems don&#039;t follow the laws of their religion. It was the same in Muhammad&#039;s time, as well. Even in the Koran, he had to admonish Moslems who did not want to go out and fight jihad.<br />
It is a big mistake to misrepresent the nature of Sharia law, as you are doing here, because the ignorant non-Moslem public will get the erroneous idea that Sharia law is not so dangerous and that we can all look forward to an Islam without it. That is a vain and dangerous hope.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moorthy Muthuswamy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/moorthy-muthuswamy/a-new-cold-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4128581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moorthy Muthuswamy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 20:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172668#comment-4128581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the modern context sharia can hardly be called as a law. A law has to be precise (of course, it doesn&#8217;t mean that it can&#8217;t be subject to interpretation). The bottom line is that sharia is much much more vague and subjective than a modern law is. Those who rely on it wholly are doomed to not even have a constitution, like Saudi Arabia is. 
 
Recent analysis from the Middle East and South Asia points to a deluge of confusing fatwas that have even contradicted each other. This and more can be a fair game in a contest of ideologies, and so is the background of religious scholars, who typically receive an insular and outdated education in Madrasas. 
 
Even the focus of sharia in many parts of the world is rather recent. In parts of India, Indonesia etc, the adherence and penetration of sharia was no where as significant as it is now. These Muslims, mostly converted from Hinduism or Buddhism, held on to their ancestral traditions and customs. 
 
Yes, they were Sunni Muslims. By some standards of today, they would hardly be called Muslims. This argument shows that if more sharia is possible, so is less sharia even in Sunni Islam. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the modern context sharia can hardly be called as a law. A law has to be precise (of course, it doesn&rsquo;t mean that it can&rsquo;t be subject to interpretation). The bottom line is that sharia is much much more vague and subjective than a modern law is. Those who rely on it wholly are doomed to not even have a constitution, like Saudi Arabia is. </p>
<p>Recent analysis from the Middle East and South Asia points to a deluge of confusing fatwas that have even contradicted each other. This and more can be a fair game in a contest of ideologies, and so is the background of religious scholars, who typically receive an insular and outdated education in Madrasas. </p>
<p>Even the focus of sharia in many parts of the world is rather recent. In parts of India, Indonesia etc, the adherence and penetration of sharia was no where as significant as it is now. These Muslims, mostly converted from Hinduism or Buddhism, held on to their ancestral traditions and customs. </p>
<p>Yes, they were Sunni Muslims. By some standards of today, they would hardly be called Muslims. This argument shows that if more sharia is possible, so is less sharia even in Sunni Islam. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D-Boy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/moorthy-muthuswamy/a-new-cold-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4128580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D-Boy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 20:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172668#comment-4128580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[why do you have good reasons? Never read a Bible? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why do you have good reasons? Never read a Bible? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yoshi11</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/moorthy-muthuswamy/a-new-cold-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4128488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yoshi11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172668#comment-4128488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately for you, the highest and most respected Islamic religious authorities for the past 1200 years disagree with you about sharia law being mandatory for all Moslems. No, WE cannot separate Sharia from Islam no matter what we do. If Sharia is to be separated from Islam, that separation will have to be made by the Islamic religious authorities. Fat chance of that ever happening. 
 
Sharia is being imposed on ALL Moslem communities to the extent that it is possible. This is not a matter of &quot;many Sunni clerics&quot;. Where are the Sunni religious authorities who are against Sharia??? And, it is not only Sunnis! What about the Shiites who make up the other 15% of the Moslem world?  
 
I do not know how you can possibly support your position that Sharia is separable from Islam. If you take sharia out of Islam, you don&#039;t have Islam anymore. As someone once said, you can straighten out a corkscrew, but then you don&#039;t have a corkscrew anymore.  
 
 As for the Ahmadiyyas, they are not even considered to be Moslems by the other 99% of the Moslem world. In Pakistan they are legally prohibited from calling themselves Moslems, and they are persecuted in Pakistan and Indonesia. So, the Ahmadiyyas are not an example of Islam, even though they like to think that they are. Even if we consider them to be Moslems, they make up only about 1% of the Moslem world. Whom is a non-Moslem supposed to believe: the 1% Ahmadiyyas, or the other 99% of the Moslem world? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately for you, the highest and most respected Islamic religious authorities for the past 1200 years disagree with you about sharia law being mandatory for all Moslems. No, WE cannot separate Sharia from Islam no matter what we do. If Sharia is to be separated from Islam, that separation will have to be made by the Islamic religious authorities. Fat chance of that ever happening. </p>
<p>Sharia is being imposed on ALL Moslem communities to the extent that it is possible. This is not a matter of &quot;many Sunni clerics&quot;. Where are the Sunni religious authorities who are against Sharia??? And, it is not only Sunnis! What about the Shiites who make up the other 15% of the Moslem world?  </p>
<p>I do not know how you can possibly support your position that Sharia is separable from Islam. If you take sharia out of Islam, you don&#039;t have Islam anymore. As someone once said, you can straighten out a corkscrew, but then you don&#039;t have a corkscrew anymore.  </p>
<p> As for the Ahmadiyyas, they are not even considered to be Moslems by the other 99% of the Moslem world. In Pakistan they are legally prohibited from calling themselves Moslems, and they are persecuted in Pakistan and Indonesia. So, the Ahmadiyyas are not an example of Islam, even though they like to think that they are. Even if we consider them to be Moslems, they make up only about 1% of the Moslem world. Whom is a non-Moslem supposed to believe: the 1% Ahmadiyyas, or the other 99% of the Moslem world? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willy Rho</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/moorthy-muthuswamy/a-new-cold-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4128456</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Willy Rho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172668#comment-4128456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We know we are at war with Islam because the President is intentionally destroying the USA, because he is a Muslim.  His wedding ring is an Islamic Faith ring.  He wore it before he got married to Michelle and used it as his wedding ring.  It says, in Arabic, &quot;There is no God but Allah&quot;.  That is the first half of the Muslim oath of Faith.  The second half says, &quot;And Mohammed is His Prophet&quot;.  You can find mandy different photos of it at WND, if you really want to know the Truth.  And it has an interpreter to translate it to English.  I really don&#039;t expect anyone to check it out, because you all know everything that is worth knowing without looking.  But he is Muslim.  And a Kenyan Born Illegal Alien.  Will that statement make you turn away?  Fools. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We know we are at war with Islam because the President is intentionally destroying the USA, because he is a Muslim.  His wedding ring is an Islamic Faith ring.  He wore it before he got married to Michelle and used it as his wedding ring.  It says, in Arabic, &quot;There is no God but Allah&quot;.  That is the first half of the Muslim oath of Faith.  The second half says, &quot;And Mohammed is His Prophet&quot;.  You can find mandy different photos of it at WND, if you really want to know the Truth.  And it has an interpreter to translate it to English.  I really don&#039;t expect anyone to check it out, because you all know everything that is worth knowing without looking.  But he is Muslim.  And a Kenyan Born Illegal Alien.  Will that statement make you turn away?  Fools. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willy Rho</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/moorthy-muthuswamy/a-new-cold-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4128434</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Willy Rho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172668#comment-4128434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The best hope for the World to rid it of Islam is for Iran to attack Israel.  This would force Israel to nuke all 57 Muslim nations (Listed in the OIC).  That would be a good start, but it would need to be followed up by a garbage document army to remove all Satanic Islamic documents from the face of earth.  And that &quot;I&#039;m a Dinner Jacket&quot; (Ahmadinejad) Leader in Iran is just the Fool Stupid Enough to Attack Israel with a Nuke. 
/Sarc/Frustration/ ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best hope for the World to rid it of Islam is for Iran to attack Israel.  This would force Israel to nuke all 57 Muslim nations (Listed in the OIC).  That would be a good start, but it would need to be followed up by a garbage document army to remove all Satanic Islamic documents from the face of earth.  And that &quot;I&#039;m a Dinner Jacket&quot; (Ahmadinejad) Leader in Iran is just the Fool Stupid Enough to Attack Israel with a Nuke.<br />
/Sarc/Frustration/ </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moorthy Muthuswamy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/moorthy-muthuswamy/a-new-cold-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4128419</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moorthy Muthuswamy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172668#comment-4128419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Islam is not sharia and sharia is not Islam! 
 
Not all denominations of Islam emphasize sharia. For instance, Ahmadiyya community doesn&#8217;t. Not coincidentally, they are relatively modern, developed and moderate. 
 
Of course, sharia is being imposed on many Muslim communities, especially by many Sunni clerics. 
 
By associating a crude form of an all-encompassing narrative of sharia with extremists, we can delineate it from Islam and, set the stage for neutralizing the radicals from within.    
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Islam is not sharia and sharia is not Islam! </p>
<p>Not all denominations of Islam emphasize sharia. For instance, Ahmadiyya community doesn&rsquo;t. Not coincidentally, they are relatively modern, developed and moderate. </p>
<p>Of course, sharia is being imposed on many Muslim communities, especially by many Sunni clerics. </p>
<p>By associating a crude form of an all-encompassing narrative of sharia with extremists, we can delineate it from Islam and, set the stage for neutralizing the radicals from within.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willy Rho</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/moorthy-muthuswamy/a-new-cold-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4128413</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Willy Rho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172668#comment-4128413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There will be getting rid of Sharia unless you rid the world of Islam.  It is a religion and way of life that spoils the soul and makes it long to do Evil.  It is the animal of nature that even animals do not have.  Pure lust and gratification.  That is why the younger fools put explosives on their bodies to go to a unlimited world of Virgins to lust upon.  Islam is an Evil Religion and culture and Law. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There will be getting rid of Sharia unless you rid the world of Islam.  It is a religion and way of life that spoils the soul and makes it long to do Evil.  It is the animal of nature that even animals do not have.  Pure lust and gratification.  That is why the younger fools put explosives on their bodies to go to a unlimited world of Virgins to lust upon.  Islam is an Evil Religion and culture and Law. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yoshi11</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/moorthy-muthuswamy/a-new-cold-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4128290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yoshi11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172668#comment-4128290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the author says that you can get any fatwa you want, he is surely referring only to minor, everyday matters. Can a Moslem get a fatwa permitting apostasy? Recognizing Israel&#039;s right to exist as a Jewish state? Abolishing the jihad against non-Moslems? Recognizing non-Moslems as equals to Moslem? I doubt it.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the author says that you can get any fatwa you want, he is surely referring only to minor, everyday matters. Can a Moslem get a fatwa permitting apostasy? Recognizing Israel&#039;s right to exist as a Jewish state? Abolishing the jihad against non-Moslems? Recognizing non-Moslems as equals to Moslem? I doubt it.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yoshi11</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/moorthy-muthuswamy/a-new-cold-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4128281</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yoshi11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172668#comment-4128281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ No, not exactly. Communism was imposed on the people from the top by brutal force. Most of the people never believed in it. As soon as that force was lifted, communism fell. In Islam, the people really believe in it. To &quot;emancipate&quot; them from Sharia law means to emancipate them from Islam itself because Islam requires sharia law, based on the Koran and the Sunnah. The new Cold War must be against Islam itself; and that makes it vastly more difficult. 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> No, not exactly. Communism was imposed on the people from the top by brutal force. Most of the people never believed in it. As soon as that force was lifted, communism fell. In Islam, the people really believe in it. To &quot;emancipate&quot; them from Sharia law means to emancipate them from Islam itself because Islam requires sharia law, based on the Koran and the Sunnah. The new Cold War must be against Islam itself; and that makes it vastly more difficult. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom4you</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/moorthy-muthuswamy/a-new-cold-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4128253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom4you]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172668#comment-4128253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I say bankrupt the Arab/Moslem counties, let them eat sand. Give up on trying to change their ideolgy...it&#039;s a failed system, let their people revolt within.... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say bankrupt the Arab/Moslem counties, let them eat sand. Give up on trying to change their ideolgy&#8230;it&#039;s a failed system, let their people revolt within&#8230;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moorthy Muthuswamy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/moorthy-muthuswamy/a-new-cold-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4127988</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moorthy Muthuswamy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172668#comment-4127988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for the comments. 
 
There is no question in my mind that in the next phase of the war we will target &#8220;radical&#8221; clerics. 
 
However, the vast majority of the Muslim population needs to be liberated from sharia/clerical grip. In this context, this has to be akin to the old Cold War with the former Soviet Union. 
 
Mind you, Muslims themselves are even more of a victim than we are.  
 
I anticipate that we will reverse the trend with our fight with &#8220;radical&#8221; Islam within the next couple of years. This may sound unreal, but I have good reasons to feel so. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the comments. </p>
<p>There is no question in my mind that in the next phase of the war we will target &ldquo;radical&rdquo; clerics. </p>
<p>However, the vast majority of the Muslim population needs to be liberated from sharia/clerical grip. In this context, this has to be akin to the old Cold War with the former Soviet Union. </p>
<p>Mind you, Muslims themselves are even more of a victim than we are.  </p>
<p>I anticipate that we will reverse the trend with our fight with &ldquo;radical&rdquo; Islam within the next couple of years. This may sound unreal, but I have good reasons to feel so. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/moorthy-muthuswamy/a-new-cold-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4127913</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172668#comment-4127913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this case the new cold war simply anticipates the hot war.  Certainly, Israel is already engaged (and has been since 1948) in a hot war with islamic sociopaths.  europe and the United States are as well but don&#039;t no it yet.  The current administration believes (wrongly) that engaging the lunatics in tehran or calling the saudi theocracy supportive of the west will eventually win them over.  No, it won&#039;t.  Instead, these inbred monsters will take advantage of the time we are providing to them to plan their global caliphate and plunge all of humanity (that muslims haven&#039;t slaughtered) into a new and permanent dark age.  christians and Jews in europe understand that the days of western civilization are numbered; we should learn from them.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this case the new cold war simply anticipates the hot war.  Certainly, Israel is already engaged (and has been since 1948) in a hot war with islamic sociopaths.  europe and the United States are as well but don&#039;t no it yet.  The current administration believes (wrongly) that engaging the lunatics in tehran or calling the saudi theocracy supportive of the west will eventually win them over.  No, it won&#039;t.  Instead, these inbred monsters will take advantage of the time we are providing to them to plan their global caliphate and plunge all of humanity (that muslims haven&#039;t slaughtered) into a new and permanent dark age.  christians and Jews in europe understand that the days of western civilization are numbered; we should learn from them.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 705/726 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 18:24:28 by W3 Total Cache -->