Islamic ‘Racism’: Muslim Blood Superior to Infidel Blood

640x392_94006_87773Arguing that Muslim blood is more precious than infidel blood, Muslim clerics in and out of Sudan are outraged because a Sudanese court has condemned a Muslim man to death—simply because he murdered American Diplomat John Granville on January 1, 2008. 

A 2009 report offers context:

The court had sentenced the men [originally four] to death in June for killing Granville and his driver in January 2008, but the sentence was cancelled in August after [his Muslim driver] Abbas’s father forgave the men.

Under Islamic law, the victim’s family has the right to forgive the murderer, ask for compensation (fedia) or demand execution.

Granville’s mother, Jane Granville, at the time had asked for the men’s execution, but her letter was rejected because it was not notarized.

The judge said the sentence was confirmed because Granville’s family, from Buffalo, in northern New York State, had requested it.

Then, in 2010, the four men convicted of murder, in the words of the U.S. State Department, “escaped from a maximum security prison” in Khartoum. One of the men, Abdul Ra’uf Abu Zaid Muhammad Hamza, was recaptured and is currently in prison awaiting execution.

Finding the punishment unjust, several international Islamic organizations, most recently, the London-based Islamic Media Observatory, have been trying to commute the death sentence, mostly by arguing for Abdul Ra’uf’s “human rights.”

However, the Legitimate League of Scholars and Preachers in Sudan (an influential body of Muslim clerics) issued a statement last month titled “Let no Muslim be killed because of an infidel”—a verbatim quote, in fact, from Islam’s prophet Muhammad—revealing the true reason why so many Muslims are trying to overturn the death sentence.

The Arabic language statement begins by asserting that “Allah has honored human beings over creation and multiplied the Muslim’s honor over the infidel’s, because Islam elevates and nothing is elevated above it. The value of the blood of Muslims is equal, or should be, but not so the value of the blood of others.”  (The Koran itself, e.g., 2:221, confirms this idea that even the lowliest Muslim is superior to any non-Muslim.)

Next, the statement quotes the clear words of Islam’s prophet, Muhammad, as recorded in a canonical hadith: “Let no Muslim be killed because of an infidel.” It then elaborates on the meaning of this statement by quoting from “the consensus of Islamic scholars,” or ijma‘, a legitimate source of Islamic jurisprudence.

The Legitimate League of Scholars and Preachers then elaborate on the prophet’s injunction as meaning that under no circumstances are Muslim rulers ever permitted to execute Muslims—even if Muslims murder non-Muslims in cold blood, including those groups that are “protected” by Islamic law, such as dhimmis (subjugated, tribute-paying non-Muslims) and foreign non-Muslims granted aman, or a pledge of security to enter Muslim lands.

Finally, after chastising the offending judge of North Khartoum’s felony court, Sayed Ahmed al-Badri, the statement concludes by warning all Muslim rulers and judges “to fear Allah, to apply Allah’s law in every matter, whether big or small, to seek justice according to the consensus of Islamic scholars, not to seek to please the infidels, not to rush the verdict, and to know that Allah prefers the annihilation of the entire earth over the spilling of the blood of one innocent Muslim” (emphasis added).

When American soldiers desecrated copies of the Koran—a book—media maelstroms occurred and grandstanding politicians condemned.  But when the scholars of Islam, quoting the words and teachings of their prophet, openly assert that the blood of non-Muslims is cheaper than the blood of Muslims—and hence the murder of an American “infidel” by a Muslim cannot be punished blood-for-blood—this is not even deemed worth reporting by Western media or condemned by Western politicians.


Don’t miss Jamie Glazov’s video interview with Raymond Ibrahim about how Obama enables Islam’s new war on Christians:

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

  • truebearing

    Yes, those Muslims sure are superior. They held onto the Middle Ages far longer than anyone else, and it isn’t even close. And who but a superior Muslim can have sex with his dead wife, or be entitled to keep slaves, rape little girls, or murder innocent people for no sane reason?

    If psychopathic cults, or deranged, depraved behavior is your idea of “superior,” no one can surpass Muslims.

  • Robert Hoffman

    The racist nature of Islam must be pointed out. We need a term that would be accepted and enter our vocabulary and become mainstream.
    This would be key for defeating the supremacist goals of the jihadists and other Islamists who resort to no-violent means for achieving their supremacist goals. This is so important and is essential for saving western civilization.

    The word supremacist is not strong enough to describe the racist nature
    of Islam.

    The detractors would say that Islam is not a race and that
    Muslims can be of any race, but this have nothing to do with the religioracist
    nature of Islam. So ‘Islamic Racism’ ‘Islamic ReligioRacism’ – let’s come up
    with a term and start using it.

    • truebearing

      I have several terms that would be accurate, but the censors wouldn’t allow me to post them.

      The problem with coming up with a term that captures the inherent evil in Islam, as manifested by its adherents, is that the term would necessarily be very long and unwieldy. Instead, let’s work on making “Muslim” stand for Islam’s evil by spreading the truth.

      • defcon 4

        The censorship is automated. The word Nazee is particularly censorship prone.

    • phenry

      Barbarianism is fine with me. Islam is a pseudo-religion. No other modern form of religion continues to dominate and control land, territory and peoples with the threat of a sword. No other modern religion claims to be superior. Jesus Christ is superior because he is God and proved it not only by overcoming death, but by fulfilling prophecy. So let Islamic leaders claim superiority in this world. We know it is false. Muslims, like all people, can be saved form God’s wrath if they repent. If they do not repent, then they will receive the same judgment that all rebellious sinners receive. The blood of Jesus was spilled so that all men could be saved. Therefore, his blood can be considered superior to all other blood. Perhaps someone can introduce the Islamic leaders, who by the way consider themselves superior and more intelligent, to modern technology in the form of DNA. Then maybe, just maybe, they will be convinced that they are mere humans like everyone else. A miracle takes place every time a person repents and is saved. Only God knows what it is going to take for Muslim women to come out of their oppression and taste the gift of freedom.

      • defcon 4

        I don’t think Yeshua ever stated or claimed he was G-d.

    • 1389AD

      Islamic totalitarianism would be a more accurate term.

  • john spielman

    islam/ sharia law is an evil antichrist apatheid system where unbelievers are relegated to death (athiest, polytheist) or second class status (Jews Christians, muslim women)
    Islamists are arrogant proud venegeful without mercy( just the opposite of Christ’s followers) as one would expect,since Islam is evil, Satanic, and leads to eternal death and hell, while Christ’s followers demontrate love joy peace patience kindness gentleness and self control and Jesus HIMSELF leads HIS followers into eternal life in the presence of HIS FATHER

  • Heather33

    Im making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do………..

  • A Z

    ” But when the scholars of Islam, quoting the words and teachings of their prophet, openly assert that the blood of non-Muslims is cheaper than the blood of Muslims—and hence the murder of an American “infidel” by a Muslim cannot be punished blood-for-blood—this is not even deemed worth reporting by Western media or condemned by Western politicians.”

    An American diplomat got wasted, the sentence is a travesty of justice and the leftwing press is nowhere to be found.

    Yes the author has the truth pegged.

  • phenry

    Thanks for the comical article. I have to laugh every time I read or hear that some Islamic leader claims to be superior over all mankind. I just turn to Psalm 2 and laugh with the Lord who laughs at puny men who see themselves as great or powerful. It also reminds of another passage that states, “pride comes before the fall”. Just as Satan fell from heaven due to his pride, these foolish leaders will be cast down in due time.

  • Geoffrey Britain

    Let the execution be by drowning them in pig’s blood.

  • defcon 4

    Bare Naked Islam had a story of a muslime taxi drive who deliberately tried to run someone over, missed his intended target and instead permanently crippled a British woman and was released without any criminal charge in NYC.

  • defcon 4

    Lieberals love islam0fascists, which says a lot about their morality, or lack thereof.

  • defcon 4

    I remember reading a story (it might have been here on FPM) about the blood money that can be paid in Saudi Barbaria in lieu of punishment and how the amount of blood money to be paid was based on not only the religion of the victim, but their sex. Of course, there was no blood money price specified for anyone Jewish, which I don’t think implies the Saudi islam0fascists consider Jewish lives priceless.