The Human Cost of Jihad Denial

usa-boston_bombing-AP-photo-620x385Wednesday brought new confirmation of the increasingly obvious fact that the U.S. intelligence apparatus in the age of Barack Obama is woefully unprepared to deal with the foremost threat to the safety of Americans today: Islamic jihad terrorism.

Nor is this lack of preparedness due to a lack of funding (Lord knows there is plenty of that for anything Obama wants to do) or other resources. There are many people who are deeply knowledgeable in the ideology and belief system that inspires Islamic jihad terror, and they are ready and willing to share their knowledge with intelligence officials – indeed, many of them did so during the Bush Administration and the early years of the Obama Administration, before his 2011 purge the of counter-terror training materials of the truth about Islam and jihad.

That purge came after hard-Left journalistic propagandist Spencer Ackerman wrote a series of “exposes” that supposedly exposed “Islamophobia” in government counterterror training — that is, truthful information about Islam and jihad. See here and here for details. Then Farhana Khera, Executive Director of an Islamic organization called Muslim Advocates, wrote a letter on October 19, 2011 to Barack Obama’s then-Deputy National Security Advisor for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism and current CIA director John Brennan. The letter was signed by 57 organizations, including many with ties to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR); the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA); Islamic Relief USA; the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA); the Muslim American Society (MAS); and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC).

The letter demanded that Obama officials “purge all federal government training materials of biased materials” – that is, materials that they claimed were biased against Islam – and “implement a mandatory re-training program for FBI agents, U.S. Army officers, and all federal, state and local law enforcement who have been subjected to biased training.”

The Obama Administration immediately complied. Dwight C. Holton, former U.S. Attorney for the District of Oregon, emphasized that same day that training materials for the FBI would be purged of everything that Islamic supremacists deemed offensive: “I want to be perfectly clear about this: training materials that portray Islam as a religion of violence or with a tendency towards violence are wrong, they are offensive, and they are contrary to everything that this president, this attorney general and Department of Justice stands for. They will not be tolerated.”

And so a year and a half after this purge, on Tuesday night we learned that not only the Russians, but also the Saudis warned U.S. officials about Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s jihadist leanings. The UK’s Daily Mail reported that “the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia sent a written warning about accused Boston Marathon bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security in 2012, long before pressure-cooker blasts killed three and injured hundreds, according to a senior Saudi government official with direct knowledge of the document. The Saudi warning, the official told MailOnline, was separate from the multiple red flags raised by Russian intelligence in 2011, and was based on human intelligence developed independently in Yemen.” Moreover, “a Homeland Security official confirmed Tuesday evening on the condition of anonymity that the 2012 letter exists, saying he had heard of the Saudi communication before MailOnline inquired about it.”

However, on Wednesday the Saudi Embassy in Washington denied all this. Embassy officials did not explain, however, how the DHS official who had confirmed the story the previous day got this false information. And so the question of whether or not the Saudis warned the FBI about Tamerlan Tsarnaev joins the strange story of the Saudi national who was questioned shortly after the Boston bombing – both remain full of unexplained anomalies. And Obama officials don’t appear to be in any hurry to clear up those anomalies, because it is likely that the Saudis are backtracking so as to cover up yet more evidence that the see-no-jihad, hear-no-jihad FBI ignored warnings that their politically correct training did not equip them to understand.

Also on Wednesday, three friends of jihad bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev were arrested for helping him dispose of material connected to the jihad bombings. These arrests followed assurances from numerous officials that the Tsarnaev brothers acted alone.

That made two intelligence failures in one day: the thorough discrediting of the widely circulated claim that the bombers acted alone, and news of a second country warning the U.S. about a jihadist at a time when U.S. officials are not allowed to know what a jihadist is.

On Tuesday, Spencer Ackerman complained that the examination of counterterror procedures that Obama promised during his press conference that day was unlikely to bear fruit. He noted that James “Clueless” Clapper, the director of national intelligence, was overseeing that review, and “yet before the inquiry has concluded, Clapper is satisfied — as he first said last week, before any review even got started — that the intelligence agencies didn’t drop the ball on Boston.”

He should be grateful for that. If the Obama Administration’s review of the massive intelligence failures related to the Boston jihad bombing were thorough, it would lead directly to him.

In any case, Wednesday’s revelations show the human cost of the denial of the reality and magnitude of the jihad threat. Three people are dead and well over 200 wounded because bumbling, ill-instructed (and in many cases reeducated) FBI agents didn’t know how to understand or act upon intelligence they received from Russia and (probably) Saudi Arabia. How many more have to die before the bloody legacy of Farhana Khera, John Brennan, Spencer Ackerman and Barack Obama is decisively rejected?

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

  • gerry

    Well terrorits should spared,after all Bill Ayres never went to jail.A pecedent has been set.Furthermore after a decent interval,this particular terrorist should be able to teach at a leading university.

    • alexisjemima

      Like Kathy Boudin, at Columbia! They've got her teaching Social Work (of course). I'm sure that a suitable tenure-track position can be created for young Dzokhar, given his relevant life experience.

      • defcon 4

        Maybe he could teach a seminar in the Politics of Bomb Making.

        • alexisjemima

          Yes! That's perfect for him. They would call the class (with sophisticated leftist irony), 'A Chicken in Every Pot'.

          • defcon 4

            Considering the amoral corruption of universities and colleges and their desperation to paint islamofascism as anything but what it is, I wouldn't be surprised if such an idea had already been floated, in any of the insular, supercilious, ivory towers of "higher learning".

          • alexisjemima

            Better yet — given the early-adolescence photos of him that are usually printed, where he looks so cute — the Justin-Bieber-Terrorist could become the next teen heart-throb. I mean, what's cooler than a young Islamist?

            Maybe he can sing. Can you see Dzokhar on American Idol? Without the backpack, maybe; but wearing that famous white backwards baseball cap and hoody.

            Later, after he matures a bit, Columbia, Antioch, Swarthmore, and Harvard can duke it out over which one scores the…resistance fighter….to head their political science department.

    • catherineinpvb

      Yes; six months from now; Jay Carney will be telling the American public; that the 'terror' strike in Boston; and strike against America; was a 'long time ago'. . .all to say; as did Hillary, albeit in coarser voice: 'What difference does it make?' Coming at us now; as common Demrat mantra; which only underscores; the most corrupt Administration ever; to literally 'rule'; in violation of our Constitution. Worse; be allowed to. . .while we hear; 'What Difference Does it Make'?

      Repubs should make this affront; 'our' mantra; for all Obama, Inc. challenges. Black Panthers and baseball bats; CAIR/Muslim Brotherhood and Obama's fingerprints; Syria/'chemicals'; the 'ides' of North Korea; China. . .WHAT difference does it make?

      Fannie/Freddie – Round Two; or 'two hundred'; Undocumented workers; Obamacare-corruption of America; Off Shore accounts; Congress=Inside Traders; Obama = Middle-East puppet; per care and feeding of 'terrorists'. . .Col. Hassan versus our soldiers and Justice.

      What difference does it make?

      Our Military; 'gouted/routed' – now 'social experiment; soldiers denied Freedom of 'Speech/Religion'; Et Al. . . 'God Bless' Planned Parenthood; and their 'Rights'/(not) on Obama's lips.

      Obama's, stealth 'C-core'; communist indoctrination/Islamist enabling Education MO's; Unemployment
      UP/UP/UP. . .America the Beautiful'; Down/Down/Down; the Treason of Benghazi; of Boston; an American Ambassador; Navy Seals; an eight-year old. . .a Marathon. . .

      (Cannot ignore, of course; our once 'free Press' that gave not just it's heart; but sold it's soul; to a President-now-Master; and thus, so enable; facilitate; all the above; and so much more.)

      'What difference does it make? Let us show them. . .

    • alexisjemima

      In other words, if I'm getting your drift (and I do think your analysis is spot on): quit the meaningless myth of "the war on terror", which ignores the real problem and accomplishes nothing; and be clear that the war that we're engaged in, whether we wanted to be or not, is with Islam. Because–like it or not–Islam IS at war against us.

  • Michael Copeland

    One of the hardest things to find in Washington, as Robert Spencer has noted before, is accountability.
    Keep up the pressure.

    • pagegl

      Could it be that such a thing is nonexistent in DC?

      • mlcblog

        No. People are praying around the clock and have been for years. Feel free to join in. Unaccountable politicians can be rooted out. Righteous public servants can be raised up.

  • http://www.adinakutnicki.com AdinaK

    The actual tallies in human costs will be seen when many urban jihads duly explode, and they will – http://adinakutnicki.com/2013/04/19/the-obama-adm

    It is the above overall denial which will reverberate in "any city USA"! Count on it…

    Adina Kutnicki, Israel http://adinakutnicki.com/about/

    • mlcblog

      Thank you for your, as ever, excellent contribution.

  • Texas Patriot

    The most amazing thing about this entire affair is how casually Tamerlan Tsarnaev regarded his role in the bombing. "Lol. You better not text me." Jihadists are totally confident they are doing the will of God and their reward is forthcoming. Tamerlan seemed perfectly happy and morally certain that he had done a good deed. Is that weird or what? How do you deal with someone who is that happy about killing innocent people? How about something like this: "Uh, sir, I hate to spoil your party, but we don't agree that what you have done is consistent with the will of God. Why don't you and your friends find another country to have your fun, okay?"

    • ObamaYoMoma

      Those innocent people killed by the bombers are not innocents according to Islam. They are in their eyes subhuman infidels.

    • mlcblog

      That is Perfect. Maybe we should invite them to a little party and see if we can't all just get along. I am sure with just a little talking and reasoning and friendship they will want to make peace!!

    • Kevin Stroup

      "How do you deal with someone who is that happy about killing innocent people?"

      Easy. You kill them with extreme ruthlessness. The Nazis and Imperial Japanese were true believers, too. The truly believed they were on a "mission from God", so to speak. We killed them by the millions. You brutally exterminate enough of them, and the rest that are left start seeing the light. You might have to kill 10s or 100s of millions to accomplish this. I am not interested in why they do what they do. I am not interested in changing them. I am interested in the most expedient way of helping them exit this world so they are no longer a threat to me.

      • Texas Patriot

        "The Nazis and Imperial Japanese were true believers, too. The truly believed they were on a "mission from God", so to speak. We killed them by the millions. You brutally exterminate enough of them, and the rest that are left start seeing the light. You might have to kill 10s or 100s of millions to accomplish this. I am not interested in why they do what they do. I am not interested in changing them. I am interested in the most expedient way of helping them exit this world so they are no longer a threat to me."

        They are definitely asking for war, and up until now all we have offered them is peace. Of course hindsight is 20-20, but it always amazed me to read how the West made every effort to make peace with Adolf Hitler, at least until now. It didn't matter that Hitler was talking openly about his visions of world conquest or that he was clearly doing exactly what he said he would. In the same way, apparently it doesn't matter that Islam has always had a vision of world conquest or that its followers are acting completely in accordance with it. Apparently the same phenomenon exists in the wild. As the predator closes in, the victim "freezes" in hope that it won't be seen. Unfortunately, that strategy rarely works.

    • alexisjemima

      Texas Patriot, I agree with everything you say here; but I would like to make one small correction. You write, ".ihadists are totally confident they are doing the will of God…"

      Having studied Islam in some depth, I want to make clear that Allah is not "God". Allah is not in any way analogous to either the Christian or the Jewish meaning of the word 'God'–indeed, he's antithetical; almost a polar opposite.

      Often the shout (given in exultation while committing some atrocity) "Allahu akbar" is translated by Western media as "God is great". What a mistake! It means "Allah is supreme".

      Yeah, Tamerlan was apparently happy and relaxed after the bombings; so, reportedly, was Dzokhar, who returned to school and 'appeared normal'. They were having a high old time. One of the many ways in which Islam is similar to Nazism, is how both replace any kind of morality, compassion, or conscience.

      • Texas Patriot

        I can't disagree with what you are saying here. Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that "From their point of view, jihadists are totally confident they are doing the will of God." Hence, their confidence, their joy, and their exhilaration about having succeeded in blowing up innocent and totally unsuspecting people celebrating the finish of a marathon.

  • Rostislav

    CAIR?! But it's a clear case of profiling! Why is CAMR absent – American-Marxist relations do need a mighty Council of their own, it's very unjust to load all the numerous tasks on ACLU only! And CANR would do a lot of good to improve the rusty American-Nazi relations: your black caucus is all blood, sweat and tears without some fine fighting Council! Any really profound change of your Land of the Free needs all three Councils most urgent – Comrade Obama must have 99,9% of voters' approval at his next elections, and not a single vote less. With a sigh from Russia – Rostislav.

  • KKKK

    we should dissolve and force out of the country CAIR, ISNA, the leftist "journalists" and all others responsible for this. we need to reinstate truth about jihad in FBI, CIA, police training NOW.

    • SCREW SOCIALISM

      Kick out the msa, muslim students association because they support jihad, as evidenced by who they invite as speakers.

      • defcon 4

        The MSA at the University of Southern California had, at one point, on its university sponsored website, an "authentic" hadith that calls for the extermination of Jews.

  • ReyR

    America is lost in words. So is Europe. Words is all they have left. Like a guy on that famous video where Chechens are robbing and executing some pathetic Russian bastard, and he is just trying to be nice.

  • Nomadic100

    I agree that the scrubbing of training manuals and the like is scandalous and dishonest, but it is hard to believe that all FBI agents and similar law enforcement personnel are merely passive robots intellectually enslaved to the ideology in their training manuals. It may be, however, that the scrubbing was accompanied by tacit warnings, on pain of professional punishment, to expand the "benefit of the doubt" in dealing with ambiguous or less than clear cut Islamist threats. Hence, Tamerlan was allowed to slide, the Kazach ex-student was not deported, etc., etc.

    • Shane

      Obama is purging those who speak the truth about our Islamic Jihadist governement from our national security forces. Great video – Robert Spencer: The Boston jihad bombings and the war on free speech: http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/04/video-robert-sp

  • BS77

    Our immigration situation, legal and illegal, is a DISASTER> We have permitted the Trojan Horse into our gates and now moan in despair…..Learning the Boston terrorists got over $100,000 in welfare etc etc….un freakin believable.

  • Spider

    Did anyone see the look on Obamas' face when he gave his big
    speech after the Boston Bo-mbings? The look was not outrage
    and grief for Americans killed or maimed as one would have
    expected – it was a look of dissapointment. Dissapointment that
    his Mu-slim Brothers had let him down once again.

    • mlcblog

      Let him down?

      • defcon 4

        By allowing an act of terrorism on US soil. After all islamofascists have been making great strides in their peaceful jihad w/o violence!

  • riddler01

    The word"Accountability"doesn't exist in the lexicon of Washington,DC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Fred

    The USA had its chance on Nov 6 2012, to stop this national sucide and thwart the take over by the Left.
    If you didn't vote because you thought Romney wasn't conservative enough, then blame yourself.

    Who is going to stop the political correctness in government and Leftist propagandists in the media?

    Anyone who speaks out is called a Xenophobe or Racist or Right wing extremist.

    What used to be called American values and principles is now called backward and the product of
    old white men, which must be "changed" by Leftist Progressiveism.

    • Owmyballs

      Otherwise rational Americans had the chance to stop swirling down the left side of the bowl back in 2008 but were too stupid, politically correct and petulant to vote for McCain. All the voters and potential voters who lived through Obama's first term and boycotted voting for Romney are absolutely at blame for what is happening to America and are beneath contempt. Allowing Obama to be reelected in 2012 was exactly like getting into a car driven by Lindsey Lohan at 2:30 AM.

      • Sussex Girl

        Wow. I couldn't have said it better. Conservatives are turning into the same whiners that Liberals have been for a long time. If they can't have it exactly the way they want it, they start crying and go home. McCain and Romney weren't perfect, not by a long shot, but the alternative is now occupying the White House. Good going, guys.

    • Lady_Dr

      Agreed. I am particularly mad at Christians who would not vote for Romney because he is a Morman and so they stayed home, an at blacks who voted for Obama, again, because he is black. In both cases, how stupid is that?

  • Texas Patriot

    They say it's always darkest before the dawn. Here's a bright spot.
    http://www.richarddawkins.net/foundation_articles

  • Stephen Carter

    Somebody should form an organization for Individuals who have suffered losses due to Islamic jihad. Their one mission would be to use any and every means to seek extrajudicial accountability against compatriots of the nationals who inflicted those losses. This would not be an attempt at redress against the specific individuals, it would be against any and all compatriots. This is the issue in 4GW — 4th generation warfare — that very nearly the entire adult population of certain nations are at war with the rest of the world, with preferred target nations. In the West we find it hard to imagine the population of an entire nation is on a continuum of greater or lesser hatred of designated enemy states, and it's their religious duty to use any occasion to literally steal from, lie to, rape, torture, or kill nationals from an enemy state. In the West we need an organization that will launch well-funded punitive attacks on Muslim countries where killing large numbers of the population is our sole goal. We would do this without rancor, without invective, without hate. And inside Western countries ordinary citizens should launch punitive attacks on Muslims who have migrated here with no intention of assimilating or contributing. Islam is laughing at the West.

    • Texas Patriot

      That's a pathetic idea. Killing them the way they kill us reduces us to their level, and makes us the real loser. The correct approach is to give them the opportunity to specifically and affirmatively renounce and repudiate all the violent parts of their religion, including whatever parts of the Koran, the life of Muhammad, and the teachings of Muhammad are inconsistent with Western values of equality, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and separation of Church and State. If they are unwilling to do that, they should be given an opportunity to leave peacefully and find another home. The bottom line is that there is no place in a free society for those who believe that killing in the name of their religion is justified.

      • Drakken

        Your wishful thinking is what gets people killed, the only way you deal with muslims is the mailed fist, they respect and they understand it, anything else is considered weakness to the savages. Your high moral ground approach will only put you in a mass grave. Your point is moot anyway, the muslims will do more jihad here in the west until they get that backlash they deserve.

      • defcon 4

        Let's all hug a rainbow! Why don't you go hug a rainbow in any islamofascist state?

  • Texas Patriot

    For all those who want to kill Muslims as much as Muslims want to kill non-Muslims, take notice. There is no place for you in America. But all is not lost. There is hope that you too will find happiness. Here's your solution. Go to Israel and volunteer to help them retake the Promised Land. You'll be doing everyone a favor!

    • Drakken

      Well gee thanks, I guess your kumbaya singing, wish upon those rainbows and unicorns will get the job done then huh? Don't forget to put that COEXIST sticker on your prius! Meanwhile back on the Ranch called reality, the muslims will continue to push and wage jihad until they get that backlash they so richly deserve and nobody is going to care how peaceful a muslim says they are for none will care. War is coming.

      • Texas Patriot

        I think all out war is probably coming in the middle east, but I think we can finesse problem in America and Europe simply by requiring the Muslims who wish to stay to renounce the violent portions of Islam. Otherwise, they should face mandatory expulsion. They immigrated on the false pretenses of being a peaceful religion; now we have found out that they misrepresented the truth. Either they are willing to correct the problem by publicly renouncing the violent parts of Islam, or they should be required to leave. That's probably as fair as it's going to get. If they want all-out war in America and Europe, we can give it to them; and it will probably be over very quickly. If they want war against Israel, they will get that too. Israel is vastly outnumbered, but technologically superior and it will by no means be as easy to defeat them. Expelling the Muslims in Israel is the first challenge. Gradually responding to attacks and acquiring the entirety of the Promised Land will be the next phase. At this point, there is no longer any just reason for delay, and the sooner we get started with this process the better.

        • Drakken

          Trust me, when the Europeans go completely nationalistic, it is not going to matter one iota, they will give any and all muslims in their midst the Serb option on steroids, the muslim is about to become a very endangered species in the west. Make no mistake, when it happens in Europe, it will come here as well.

    • Owmyballs

      TP, mainstream America wants to ban islam because it is an anti-Constitutional and treasonous political force that is trying to overthrow our government.

      You are part of the anti-American fringe. But all is not lost. You can head to Hamasistan and volunteer as a human shield.

      • Texas Patriot

        I think the violent parts of Islam should be banned, but I have no desire to kill Muslims. As far as I'm concerned, if they do not wish to renounce the violent parts of Islam, they should be allowed to leave peacefully and go wherever they want.

        • Drakken

          Your solution has no merit and is nothing but wishful thinking, every muslim will have to be made at the point of a gun to do what we want them to do.

        • defcon 4

          LOL, why don't you try proposing your solution publicly in any islamic state? Better make sure your will is made out and your life insurance paid up before you do so.

          • Texas Patriot

            I have no interest in setting foot in an Islamic state, nor to I wish to see unrepentant violent jihadists allowed to remain in Western states. If they want to visit the West, let them renounce the violent aspects of Islam, or let them stay away. There is no other solution but to ban those who wish to make war on non-Muslims in the name of Islam. Allowing them to stay is what is laughable.

    • defcon 4

      You, FAIL.

  • uptownsteve

    Racist righties baying at the moon. Your rants about Fast and Furious went no where. Your yapping about Benghazi went nowhere. Now your pathetic attempt to blame President Obama for the Boston Bombing will go nowhere as well. You are obviously trying to hold Obama to a standard no other US President has been held to and most of the American public knows it. So keep on yapping fools. You are veering inexorably toward irrelevance. And I say ABOUT TIME.

    • Mary Sue

      the rants never went "anywhere" yet because the mainstream press isn't doing its job, it's too busy covering obama's ass!

      Whatever does this have to do with race? Identity politics is NOT helpful!

      • SSmith

        Indeed, anyone who dares to criticise Obama has to be a " racist" of course. It seems his supporters only see the colour of his skin (, as with Muslims even though Islam is not a race) otherwise they would never use the race card. It s "positive racism" in fact.
        Non- white critics of Bush were not labelled racists and non -white critics of BO can't be labelled racists!

        How does uptownsteve know what colour any of us are on here anyway to make assumptions ! Seems we are not as obsessed with colour as he is , but more with character and behaviour.

    • Drakken

      Great job Sparky! You have again thrown down the race card ! Well aren't you special! I would lay money on a bet that if comrade Obummer was there in front of you, that you would get down on bended knee and worship and blow him.

    • Owmyballs

      upittytownsteve;
      I see you're still pretending to be an angry Black man. Maybe Obamacare can provide you with the anti-psychotic meds you need.

    • Lan Astaslem

      it's because the media are in the tank for your boy obamao

    • defcon 4

      Islam isn't a race moontard.

    • John EColeman

      Uptown Stevie ,
      We the Yapping, Racist ,Pathetic, United States Citizens , find your stupidity nothing more
      than an expression of the true rectum face you are !!!

    • kafir4life

      uptown is right on one thing. We haven't held President Stinky (BO) Obama to the same standards we've held to any other President. That's usually the case when someone is selected for a position based on affirmative action rather than qualifications. They're given pass after pass, because it's the only way they can keep the job. Look at President Stinky's beard, the Mooche queen. She ADMITTED that it was affirmative action and NOT skills that got her the 350k job she had before Stinky was selected as president. As an aside…..they still haven't filled her "job", but Stinky did manage to get the hospital 5 million from StinkyCare.

      Thanks for pointing out the obvious Steve!!

  • marios

    Liberalism is really mental disorder. "Texas patriot" as all liberals see .1% or real picture. Mostly liberals are gullible people who don't want to educate themselves and loll by corrupted, biased MSM controlled by Leftists, US traitors propaganda machine. Moderate Muslims? Were Germans moderate when Hitler just seized Power? Yes, most of them. But by 1938 almost all Germanys became Nazis as Hitler's opponents were annihilated by that time and common people took lesson. Form 5 to 10% of active minority made changes but 90 to 95 % are passive and relevant. It is historical statistic. The most of Muslims share idea of world wide Caliphate which means death of Western civilization and Holocaust for majority of non-Muslims (Christians, Jews, Buddhists, etc). 100,000 (!!!) Christians are killed by Muslims per year world widely. MSM keep silence about it. Even Vatican keep silence on that tragedy for Christians world. Liberals are cowards and opportunists. They prefer be blind and deaf. Unfortunately soon can be too late and all of us including those liberals "useful idiots" will share horrible end.

  • marios

    Lets demand our Congressmen and Senators to act on Founding Fathers principles. If we will be passive we are doomed. Treason is only word for what WH and Dem's party establishment are doing.
    Death of US ambassador and 3 Americans in Bengazi, scandal with "Fast and furious" with US officer death as result of that WH program, Nidal Hasan killed 13 and injured 37 … List is long. Blood of all those people on BHO and his accomplices hands.

  • Excalibur

    The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.

    Check out some of the murder verses in the quran

    Quran (9:111) Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): THEY FIGHT IN HIS CAUSE AND SLAY AND ARE SLAIN: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Injil, and the Qur'an: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme.

    "I shall terrorise the infidels. So wound their bodies and incapacitate them, because they oppose Allah and his apostle." (Qur'an 8:12)

    "Paradise lies under the shade of swords" (Sahih Bukhari V4B5N73)

    "Muhammad said, ‘You are commanded to carry out jihad against the unbelieving infidels until they submit to Islam' " (Qur'an 47:4)

    Quran (2:191-193) – "And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution [of Muslims] is worse than slaughter [of non-believers]…and fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah."

    Quran (2:244) – "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."

    Quran (4:89) – "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks."

    Quran (8:39) – "And fight with them until there is no more persecution and religion should be only for Allah"

    Bukhari (52:220) – Allah's Apostle said… 'I have been made victorious with terror'

    Tabari 9:69 "Killing Unbelievers is a small matter to us"

    Ibn Ishaq: 990 – Lest anyone think that cutting off someone's head while screaming 'Allah Akbar!' is a modern custom, here is an account of that very practice under Muhammad, who seems to approve.

    Now what muhammad did :

    Al-Nadr bin al-Harith – KILLED

    Uqba bin Abu Muayt – KILLED

    Asma bint Marwan – KILLED

    Abu Afak – KILLED

    Kab bin al-Ashraf – KILLED

    Ibn Sunayna – KILLED

    Assassination of Musaylimah :Abu Dawud 38:4348

    Assassination of `Abdullah bin Ubayy bin Salul al-`Aufi: Sahih Bukhari 5:59:462

    Assassination of Abu `Afak : Ibn Ishaq p. 675 / 995.

    Assassination of Abu Rafi’ (Sallam Ibn Abu'l-Huqayq) : Sahih Bukhari 5:59:369

    Assassination of Ka’b bin Ashraf : Sahih Bukhari 3:45:687

    Murder of `Asma' Bint Marwan : Ishaq 676

    The Killing of the Chieftain of Dumah : Al-Tabari vol.9 p.58-59

    Assassination of Khalid b. Sufyan : Abu Dawud 1:1244

    The Killing of Khubaib : Sahih Bukhari 4:52:281

    The Torture and Murder of Kinanah b. al-Rabi b. al-Huqyaq : Tabari vol. 8, p.123

    The Killing of Umaiya bin Khalaf Abi Safwan : Sahih Bukhari 4:56:826

    The Murder of `Uqba bin Abi Mu`ayt : Ishaq 308, See Also Tabari IX:121

    The Killing of Yusayr b. Rizam : Al-Tabari vol.9 p.120

    The Slaughter of the Ten Meccans : Tabari VIII 181

    Murder of Habbar Ibn al-Aswad b. Ka`b al-`Ansi : Sahih Bukhari 5:59:662

    Murder of al-Huwayrith Nuqaydh Wahb Qusayy : Ishaq 551

    The Murder of Abdullah Khatal of B. Taym b. Ghalib and his Slaves : Sahih Bukhari 3:29:72

    The Murder of Miqyas Hubaba : Sirat Page 551

    The Blind Jew : Tabari VII 112, See Also Ishaq 372

    He went on to kill Jewish tribes as well:

    The Banu Qurayza

    The Banu Qaynuqa

    The Banu Nadir

    He also SLAUGHTERED 900 Jews in one day and don't forget that he raided their caravans, looted them as well as taking their women as his "wives" or sex slaves.

    Here are just some of the battles that Muhammad fought in, in order to spread his religion with the sword…

    1.WADDAN
    2.SAFWAN
    3.DUL-ASHIR
    4.BADR
    5.BANI SALIM
    6.BANI QUAINUQA
    7.SAWIQ
    8.GHATFAN
    9.BAHRAN
    10.UHAD
    11.HUMRA-UL-ASAD
    12.BANU NUDAIR
    13.DHATUR RIQA
    14.BADRU-UKHRA
    15.DUMATUL-JANDAL
    16.BANU MUSTALEQ WITH HADRAT JAWRIYA
    17.AHZAB
    18.BANI QURAIZA
    19.BANI LAHYAN
    20.DHI QARD
    21.KHAIBAR
    22.WADIYUL-QURA AND TAIM
    23.MECCA AND FALL OF MECCA
    24.HUNAIN
    25.GHAZWA
    26.TABUK

    There is not a time in history where muslims were apathetic or pacifist rather they were and still are pathetic and antagonistic.

    • Shane

      Great post, but it is almost impossible to reach liberals who defend Muslims with logic and facts. Perhaps it is a new mental disease – Jihad Denial Syndrome.

  • jerome

    What DOES the USA stand for if it embraces terrorists and denounces people who point out that there are radical elements in our midst?
    What does this say about the USA's future prospects and the upholding of the constitution.
    Why are we sending a clear message to our sworn enemies that we are capitulating in the face of
    terror and giving up our rights to defend ourselves.
    Why has America suddenly buried its head in the desert sands ?

    • Richard

      All you need to do to understand this weird denial phenomenon is watch Jaws (1975).
      The mayor of Amity demands the beaches are kept open for the summer dollars the town needs despite the evidence that the monster is gobbling the tourists.

      • Texas Patriot

        Great analogy.

    • Drakken

      Sooner or later there will be a shot heard around the world, again, and once that kicks off, it will be off to the races with no stopping it. The backlash that this craven administration is formenting is going to be epic.

  • Texas Patriot

    Every American president since Jimmie Carter has been an appeaser of Islam. If anything, Obama is more awake and less of an appeaser than any of the rest. Have you heard Obama asking Israel to make concessions for the "peace process" like every other American president has done? No, and you won't either. What Obama saw and heard on 09/11/12 is enough to chill the spine and strengthen the resolve of any American president. "OBAMA, OBAMA, WE'RE ALL OSAMA" The truth is that what happened with the Tsarnaevs is perfectly consistent with the teachings of Islam, and we're now all on notice that the same kind of all out spontaneous "personal jihad" could happen anywhere at any time. The correct response is to request Muslims to renounce the jihadist and violent portions of Islam, or to leave the West. And the sooner we do that the better.

    • defcon 4

      WRT your last sentence do you realize the insanity of what you propose? Christianity is essentially peaceful, when Martin Luther publicly criticised the Catholic Church there were no death threats, no calls to have him murdered for apostasy. To publicly call for the renunciation of "jihadist and violent portions of islam" would be suicide in ANY islamic state. People have been killed for FAR less.

      • Texas Patriot

        Then BACK to the Islamic states is where they should go if they want to hold onto the violent elements of Islam.

  • John EColeman

    An OBAMANATION of the United States of America !!! If you don't know the meaning ? Look it up !!!!

  • Shane

    Islam has never been a religion of peace, as Muhammad and his disciples spread his religion with the sword. Great videos: The Truth About Muhammad: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtrtxW_64PU
    The Brutal Truth About Islam: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwA3jErg9Bc

  • slider 96

    Where is that in the Teebagger Dictionary ?

    • kikorikid

      s96,
      Teabaggers have/had nothing doing that promotes Jihad against the West.
      Several here have ,correctly, pointed out that the"social-justice progressives"
      currently in charge will meet the same end as all other non-believers.
      They are delusional believing their socialist utopia can/will co-exist
      with the Umma.

    • Defcon 4

      Right next to your lemon scented camel urine.

  • slider 96

    Hey Spencer , tell me the difference between 9/11 and the Boston bombing ? FBI /CIA both dropped the ball then and now ., although one must really tried hard to duplicate the mind-numbing failures on 9/11, the way our intelligence agencies operate need a complete overhaul .

  • owmyballs

    TP,
    there are no non-violent aspects of islam and nobodey gives a $hit how many islamopithecines you want to hug. Burying our heads in the sands of isolationism is what makes it so easy for those semi-erect hominids to keep attacking us. Civilization does not have to tolerate a genocidal force just because it masquerades as a religion. And stop beating off that straw man. Nobody suggested that all islamopithecines should be killed, anymore than they suggested that all other vermin should be exterminated.

  • owmyballs

    TP,
    there aren’t any non-violent aspects of islam and nobody cares how many islamopithecines you want to hug. Burying our heads in the sand of isolationism is what makes it so easy for those semi-erect hominids to keep attacking us. Civilization does not have to tolerate a genocidal force just because it masquerades as a religion. And stop beating off that straw man. Nobody suggested that all islamopithecines should be killed, anymore than they suggested that all other vermin should be exterminated.

    • Texas Patriot

      "there aren't any non-violent aspects of islam"

      Sure there are. Look at the positive effects that Islam has had on the lives of some Americans. Malcolm X was a drug dealer known as Chicago Red. He converted to Islam in prison, and learned to read by studying the dictionary one word at a time starting with "a". He went on to become one of the most celebrated intellectuals of the 20th Century before he was gunned down for failing to "submit" to the violent aspects of Islam. And there are many more. Muhammad Ali. Kareem Abdul Jabbar. Ahmad Rashad. Akeem Olajuwon. Take away the violent parts, and Islam is quite positive. With the violent parts, it has no place in the West.

      • defcon 4

        I don't believe your characterization of Malcolm X, particularly WRT your assertion that he repudiated violent jihad. You're taking the Hollywood portrayal of Malcolm X at face value. Um, Kareem Abdul Jabbar provide one of his private homes to violent jihadis — who died killing police officers.

        What about the Jew hating parts of ALL the holey books of islam? What about the parts that call for the subjugation of unbelievers?

  • Texas Patriot

    "there aren't any non-violent aspects of islam"

    Sure there are. Look at the positive effects that Islam has had on the lives of some Americans. Malcolm X was a drug dealer known as Chicago Red. He converted to Islam in prison, and learned to read by studying the dictionary one word at a time starting with "a". He went on to become one of the most celebrated intellectuals of the 20th Century before he was gunned down for failing to "submit" to the violent aspects of Islam. And there are many more. Muhammad Ali. Kareem Abdul Jabbar. Ahmad Rashad. Akeem Olajuwon. Take away the violent parts, and Islam is quite positive. With the violent parts, it has no place in the West.

    • defcon 4

      "Celebrated intellectual" by whom? Nation of Islam adherents? Malcolm X supported the bifurcation of the USA into white and non-white nations. He never repudiated ANY of the violent, intolerant, totalitarian, Jew hating vomit in any of the books of islam.

    • owmyballs

      TP,

      all of the people you mentioned converted to islam out of hatred – not that converting to islam is an aspect of islam.You are living proof that islam kills brain cells.

  • Texas Patriot

    Most converts can't read Arabic and have no idea what they're signing onto when they agree to become Muslims. I think Malcolm X falls into that category. It did help him to change his life, and it has helped many Americans change their lives for the better in the same way. If there was ever a way to eliminate the violence and hatred from Islam, I think it could be a viable religion in America. But we are not even close to that now. And Malcolm X himself found that out the hard way.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mX7ZzuitCQ0

    • owmyballs

      TP,

      islam gave Malcom X a focus for his rabid hatred of Whitey (especially dem joos) and 80% of the unholy koran is violent.Without that central tenet of violence, islam couldn't be classified as a religion at all. Islam is already a viable religion here because 20% of Americans hate their own country.

      So what is your islamopithecine name? Hasn Bin Lade?

  • Texas Patriot

    Islam finds fertile soil in an environment of decadence and decay, and no where on earth has that environment been more fruitful than America over the last five decades. Since John Kennedy wrote his famous "The Soft American" article for Sports Illustrated in the Fall of 1960, the average weight of an American man has risen from 165 pounds to 195 pounds, and the percentage of our national gross national product devoted to health care has risen from 5.2% to over 17%. During this same period, the educational achievement of American high school students has fallen from No. 1 in the world in science and math to No. 21 and No. 24, respectively, despite the fact that we spend more per capita in educating our young people than any nation on earth. It is no coincidence that during this same period the number of Muslims in America has risen from less than 300,000 to more than 7 million. As Malcolm X said, "The chickens have come home to roost." Instead of throwing away trillions of dollars and thousands of American lives on foreign wars and attempts at "nation-building" that had absolutely no chance of success, we should have been working to build up our own nation, and sooner or later we will have to get around to that. Unfortunately, America has been asleep, and thus far not even the atrocities of 9/11/2001 or 4/15/2013 have been enough to awaken the "sleeping giant" that Japanese Admiral Yamamoto spoke of after the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941.