Who We Must Blame For Boston


041913_potus_presser_640Barack Obama promised Tuesday that he would be taking lessons from the Boston Marathon jihad bombing: “When an event like this happens, we want to review every step that was taken, we want to leave no stone unturned, we want to see if there is in fact additional protocols and procedures that could be put in place that would further improve and enhance our ability to detect a potential attack.’’

Sounds great – but ultimately all Obama offered were words. Words that are unlikely to be backed up by real action. The one thing that needs to be done – an official acknowledgement of the reality and magnitude of the global jihad, and the commitment of U.S. intelligence to understanding and combating it – is the one thing that will not be done.

After all, the Administration official Obama has charged with ferreting out the lessons of Boston is none other than his director of national intelligence, James “Clueless” Clapper, who thinks the Muslim Brotherhood is “largely secular.” Obama explained: “Part of what Director Clapper is doing is to see if we can determine lessons learned from what happened’’ in Boston.

Yet one of the foremost of those lessons is that people like James Clapper should not be entrusted with the nation’s intelligence-gathering apparatus. The Russians had Boston jihad bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev under surveillance, were deeply concerned about his contacts with jihad terrorists, and shared those concerns with the FBI. Yet Obama said that criticism of how the FBI handled that intelligence was “not right, although I am sure it generated some headlines. It’s not as if the FBI did nothing. They not only investigated the older brother, they interviewed the older brother, they concluded that there were no signs he was engaging in extremist activity.”

Obama concluded from this that “the question then is, is there something that happened that triggered radicalization and an actual decision by the older brother to engage in the tragic attack we actually saw in Boston, and are there additional things that could have been done in the interim that might have prevented it?’’

That’s not the only conclusion that can be drawn from the fact that the FBI found no signs that Tsarnaev was “engaging in extremist activity.” The other is that the FBI had no idea how to tell whether or not Tamerlan Tsarnaev was “engaging in extremist activity,” because the “extremist activity” he was engaging in was Islamic jihad, and Obama’s FBI is forbidden to study Islamic jihad. This is because the Obama Administration in 2011 mandated the scrubbing of counter-terror training materials of the truth about Islam and jihad. It is the terror threat that dare not speak its name.

The Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) deserves some credit for this — they mounted a huge campaign in 2010 to have me dropped as a trainer of FBI agents. Nor was that campaign personal: they mounted similar campaigns against any trainers and training materials that told the truth about Islam and jihad. But CAIR’s was not a lonely struggle. Others responsible for the politically correct scrubbing of counterterror training materials of any mention of Islam or jihad include hard-Left pseudo-journalist Spencer Ackerman, who published a series of “exposes” of “Islamophobic” counterterror training; Fatima Khera of Muslim Advocates, who wrote a letter to Obama’s then-chief counterterrorism adviser and current CIA director, John Brennan, demanding that this material be removed. Brennan, who readily acquiesced to this demand, also bears responsibility, as does Salam al-Marayati of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, who piled on in the mainstream media. They got what they wanted: now FBI agents are woefully ill-equipped to deal with the Islamic jihad threat, which they largely must pretend does not even exist.

Now in Boston, we have begun reaping the fruit of this.

Khera’s letter to Brennan complained that my books could be found in “the FBI’s library at the FBI training academy in Quantico, Virginia”; that a reading list accompanying a powerpoint presentation by the FBI’s Law Enforcement Communications Unit recommended my book The Truth About Muhammad; and that in July 2010 I “presented a two-hour seminar on ‘the belief system of Islamic jihadists’ to the Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) in Tidewater, Virginia,” and “presented a similar lecture to the U.S. Attorney’s Anti-Terrorism Advisory Council, which is co-hosted by the FBI’s Norfolk Field Office.” In fact, I gave many such presentations to various government agencies and law enforcement groups.

Again, the complaints about me and my work were not singular or personal; they came amid many other complaints about similar material from other writers, and presentations by other counter-jihadists. So now all that material is gone, and the witless and politically correct FBI of today ignored Tamerlan Tsarnaev despite repeated warnings from Russian authorities. And if they did investigate him, they didn’t know what to look for or how to understand what they were seeing.

The Leftist journalists and Islamic supremacist groups who pressured Obama (as well as Obama and his administration officials themselves) ought to be held accountable for the law enforcement and intelligence failures connected to the Boston jihad bombings. J’accuse.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

  • http://www.adinakutnicki.com AdinaK

    This is how America came from here to there, and there is NO obfuscating around it – http://adinakutnicki.com/2013/04/18/muslim-brothe

    The strengthened emergence of the Brotherhood Mafia – regardless of this or that jihadi offshoot…they all operate under the Brotherhood's umbrella – can be traced back to Barack HUSSEIN Obama's door.

    Adina Kutnicki, Israel http://adinakutnicki.com/about/

    • gerry

      Who is to blame?The Russian off course!

      • ratonis

        NO! It was George Bush!

    • Marit, Norway

      Obama is himself a muslim, inherited from his Kenyan father. Thats why he is called Hussain. And a non-muslim could not have given such a positive speech on islam as Obama did i Cairo. Impossible !
      His loyalty is definitely to islam. Thats why he is acting like a crook, denying islamic jihad.

      • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

        He is clearly a marxist of muslim heritage.

        And every decision shows it. From his protocol to visit mosques overseas to immigration for muslim hotbeds, he acts and works towards a wider caliphate some day.

      • Lan Astaslem

        and if he has truly left islam, he's an apostate – marked for death by the ''religion of peace" . Imagine how these muslonazis must act when they aren't in their peaceful mode!

  • speller

    Whom!

    • M. Demetrius

      Nouns and pronouns used as predicate nominatives keep the nominative case "who", not the objective "whom".

      • ratonis

        Interlocutions of non-axiomatic theoritations within a contrapostatic omniax arouse intraculative pudridilaction.

        • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

          Can't we just blame GW Bush?

  • UglyTruth

    http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2013/04/27/bfp-br

    How the Tsarnaev brothers were connected to Gladio-B.

  • AnOrdinaryMan

    If anything spells T-R-E-A-S-O-N, its the scrubbing of the words “Islamic Jihad” from the FBI’s training materials. Robert’s article is exactly what needs to be said, because it cuts right through the thick layer of manure that the Traitor-in-Chief puts on everything he says.

    • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

      Michele Bachmann discussed this with Mark Levin a couple of days on his radio show.
      Her site and letters and explains how this administration is working feverishly to do this.

      And McCain reached across the isle to help Brennan get confirmed. He needs to go.
      http://bachmann.house.gov/sites/bachmann.house.go

      • mlcblog

        McCain has always been untrustworthy.

  • pierce

    Our President has let down the very people who elected him, and it keeps getting worse, and this is only the first year of his second term. How much worse can it get?
    Mr. Inept Cover-up, keep digging a whole for yourself. You might have to resign, but no, your gigantic ego would never permit that.
    The world is now seeing what you really are, Claire-belle the clown from Howdy Dowdy.

  • Mary Sue

    So much for political correctness. If this is anything it's proof that Identity Politics and Political Correctness are EXTREMELY unhelpful and worse than useless in the Real World.

    • Nanis

      The wife of the dead terrorist muslim should be charged with treason, and the rest of the people who knew who they were and didn't say anything.

  • john spielman

    The House of Rep must impeach him now .Even if the Senate does not remove him it will scare him into abandoning his treasonous behavior towards Islam.

  • http://twitter.com/theoprinse @theoprinse

    Anti-Islam comprises three primary issues:

    1. The ideology of Islam is indivisible and because Islam is not a religion but a military doctrine, Islam in reality is an indivisible murderous military doctrine

    2. In a lesser extent MI6, ISI FSB etc. but to a very great extent the US CIA or circles within the CIA in connection to segments of the US political elite and the random White House administration historically and in a complex manipulative way plays along with the Muslim terrorists and the CIA are also geopolitically on a daily basis operationally at the forefront with intrigue and infiltrators and psy ops methods in Muslim terror against our own Christian Jewish and infidel Westerners.*

    The CIA in this respect became pivot and executive since Brzezinski ill advising Carter in the fall of Persia into Iran which then became decades of current day policies or method to betray western oriented and secular people in Arab and Asean countries into the hands of despotic fundamentalist regimes.

    Indeed the mass media – since their embedding in the first Iraqi war and Hollywood since Tom Cruise – are now part in this anti-US dictatorship regime within the US.

    3. The leadership of the Christian World Council of Churches deny claim 1. and recognize falsely precisely the opposite that Islam is a so-called Abrahamite religion … The Christian world churches DENY or better are in denial – through their own left wing Christian liberation theology or from the right wing by reason that the so-called primacy of faith would be compromised towards secularism when Islam where to denied being a faith etc. – that Islam in reality – under the said false pretext of religion – is a murderous military doctrine legitimated by quasi religion.

  • EchoVector

    The "One Thing That Will Keep America Safe" is to gut the hell out of this overbearing, unconstitutionally bloated sad damned excuse that we have for a Federal Government and put it back the way the founders intended it to be.

    THAT is the "One Thing That Will Keep America Safe".

    All the rest of this is bullcrap noise, obfuscation and misdirection, designed to keep the idiot sheeple distracted for another day.

    Get your heads out of your asses, stop arguing THEIR talking points, and take YOUR government back.

    ( Or don't, and just sit around bitching to each other about it, fiddling like Nero while Rome burned around him………. )

  • Rostislav

    Can we say that Hitler betrayed his voters? No: he was quite open with his program for Germany's profound change. The same is true about Stalin's promise to annihilate all the wealthy Russian peasants. Was Obama more secretive about his pro-Islamic allegiance? Not at all – it was quite clear from his first days in the office. The only thing he is secretive about is his real biography – and that secrecy is, I believe, much more expressive and threatening, than any Tsarnaev clues, past, present or future. Rostislav, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.

    • Kevin Stroup

      Dead on. We keep blaming Barach Hussein Obama for being elected POTUS when it was we, the American body politic, who elected, and reelected him. The real problem is the idiot American voter who just wants "mo free stuff from da gubment".

    • kasandra

      I've been making this argument since just before the 2008 election. He told us he wanted to fundamentally transform the country, "spread the wealth around" (irrespective of who earned it), that the "sweetest" sound he ever heard is the sound of the muzzien calling the faithful to prayer at sunset and that if the balloon goes up he'll stand with the Muslims, and yet the idiot electorate voted for him and voted for him again last year. You just can't fix invincible ignorance.

  • WildJew

    Don't leave out those foolish Americans who elected (and then re-elected) Barack Hussein Obama and more importantly, continue to support Obama.

    • M. Demetrius

      The blindest of all people are those who paste their own hands over their own eyes.
      [i]having eyes, they do not see[/i]

      • WildJew

        Blind partisanship is very dangerous, whether it be on the right (my side) or the left, Obama's side. Blind partisanship on the left (I include the mainstream media) are doing incalculable damage to this country under the administration of Barack Obama.

    • mercury

      Just gimme my Obama phone and the President can do no wrong.

  • stellarium

    "The Russians had Boston jihad bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev under surveillance". I didn't know he already was indicted, tried and convicted by the jury. All I see is the mainstream media and the pseudo-government saying he IS the bomber.

    • Serge Baruch

      Now push your head deeper into the sand – the only logic thing for you to do at this stage. And the higher your derierre will be lifting towards the heaven, the more your position will resemble Mohammedan prayer.

      • stellarium

        Is that the smartest thing you have to say? Shame on you.

  • Cassandra

    Obama and hi followers in the government are the culprits. They have the blood of innocent people on their end and like Robert I say;J"ACCUSE.
    A lot of people in the American public are very naive. They are listening to the main stream media and do not read enough good and true material. Some are not interested of course but for us who see and understand what is going on it is very depressing. If Obama does not destroy this country in his second term he certainly will if he steals a third term.This man is a TRAITOR to this country

  • uptownsteve

    If Obama is responsible for the Boston Bombing, then how was Bush NOT responsible for 9/11?

    • rogrdane

      "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me!"
      No single individual will be able to thwart 'terror attacks' but the atmosphere of tolerance that has been created since O took office is exactly what Chamberlain created in Britain. The facts are obvious to anyone who will not let 'their affiliations' shade their observations. We've had some five 'real' attacks in which success (or partial) was achieved by the terrorists (June 2009 – Little Rock, Arkansas ; September 2009 – New York, New York subway; November 2009 – Fort Hood, Texas; December 2009 – Detroit, Michigan; May 2010 – New York City, New York ) While all of these did not result in absolute success we can see that "atmosphere" and all the acquiescing and bowing to Middle East (so called) dignitaries has done little if anything to prevent terror attacks. And many of these have been "well into" O's reign while the 9/11 was early on in Bush's Presidency.

    • mlcblog

      I don't hear Mr. Spencer blaming Obama as much as the whole of his cohorts who have reduced our defenses in the name of being nice to our enemies.

    • Jim_C

      Oh, uptownsteve–you are looking for reason where there is none.

      • Western Canadian

        A comment so random as to have no meaning.

    • Gary

      Stevie….. I will explain this slowly because you read slowly…….Obama is the POTUS. ( that means the president of the USA incase you don't know what that means. When someone is the head of a company, that person is responsible for what goes on in the company. The same can be said for the POTUS. Let me know if you now understand.
      Just remember that what Mr. Spencer wrote was about Mr. Obama. That's it.

      • uptownsteve

        And Bush was the POTUS when we were hit on 9/11. Was he responsible? Please answer the question.

        • kasandra

          Did Bush strip all references to Islamism and jihad from FBI and military training manuals and restrict investigation of Jihadists unless and until there was overt evidence of a planned attack? You see, Bush did all he could to protect the U.S. from attacks by Islamists while Mr. Obama is doing all he can to protect Islamists from investigation. Got it now?

          • uptownsteve

            Oh my. You just make it up as you go along, huh?

          • Brian

            No stevie,

            It is not made up. It's facts. Something you can't get your head around

          • Western Canadian

            Trying to get his head around a fact, would cause it to explode….. He's pathetic.

          • kasandra

            I guess the truth hurts. Google or Bing the FBI document: “Guiding Principles:
            Touchstone Document on Training.” Then get back to the adults.

          • uptownsteve

            Just googled it and of course YOU'RE LYING. But then again you're a righty. If your mouth is moving you're lying. The document reads: "Training must emphasize that no investigative or intelligence collection activity may be based solely on race, ethnicity, national origin, or religious affiliation.4 Specifically, training must focus on behavioral indicators that have a potential nexus to terrorist or criminal activity, while making clear that religious expression, protest activity, and the espousing of political or ideological beliefs are constitutionally protected activities that must not be equated with terrorism or criminality absent other indicia of such offenses." OOPS.

          • kasandra

            In other words, as I said, an investigation requires an overt act. Expression alone will not support it. And you call me a liar?

          • uptownsteve

            Expression of what? Religion? Race?

          • objectivefactsmatter

            "Expression of what?"

            Expression (communication) of ideas that drive enemies in their plots against the US constitution.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            "Just googled it and of course YOU'RE LYING."

            Retread: "Workplace violence."

            That pretty much ends that aspect of the discussion.

            Unless you want to hear again that, "The future must not belong to those that slander the prophet of Islam."

        • objectivefactsmatter

          "And Bush was the POTUS when we were hit on 9/11. Was he responsible? Please answer the question."

          All executives are accountable for their areas of responsibility and expected to perform based on resources available. This includes lessons from history.

          Bush is responsible for ignoring the growing threat based on the history up to that moment, and so was Clinton equally responsible for the ongoing terror up to that point.

          Obviously anyone who failed to learn crucial lessons on 9/11/2001 has no business leading this nation or holding any executive positions in government.

          Furthermore, it's not merely that another attack happened "on his watch." O'Bama's entire approach has been one of appeasement where there are no benefits, only costs and pitfalls.

          That's what we're responding to. It's probably over your head.

          Maybe we should limit voting rights to land owners or have some kind of written test to qualify people.

          • uptownsteve
          • objectivefactsmatter

            "Chew on THIS racist."

            It's funny when people reveal how poorly they comprehend the discussion.

            As I said above: "All executives are accountable for their areas of responsibility and expected to perform based on resources available. This includes lessons from history. "

            You're a first-class loser.

    • Western Canadian

      9/11 began on Clintons watch (training etc.), and warnings about large numbers of arabs taking flying lessons were ignored. On Bush's watch, contrary to left wing fantasies, there were NO, repeat NO, warnings issued about plans to use aircraft as cruise missiles. The report that the hard left lies about, refers to many things, but not what happened on 9/11. obama has prohibited any action responding to or linkage to anything that puts islam, the bloodiest cult in all of human history, in a less than flattering light. Warnings from the russians and the saudis dealing specifically with the older of the two murders, were ignored on his watch…. Gee, you can't see the difference… You must be trying very hard to remain as blind as you are.

      • uptownsteve

        Condoleeza Rice was handed a CIA memo in AUGUST 2001 entitled "Bin Laden planning a terrorist air strike in US" which she and the Bush administration IGNORED. They OWN 9/11.

        • objectivefactsmatter

          "Condoleeza Rice was handed a CIA memo in AUGUST 2001 entitled "Bin Laden planning a terrorist air strike in US" which she and the Bush administration IGNORED"

          The memo contained the date and tactics proposed but Bush laughed it off. Is that what delusional leftists like to fantasize? What about Clinton's memos? Obviously you're a partisan troll.

          And anyway, even if Bush was somehow as culpable as the left wants him to be, is that merely to set the stage for making 0'Bama better as long as no single attack kills 3000?

          Great. What a bunch of psychotic traitors. You've been programmed to use your emotions to find what you think is true, and you've been programmed to be easily manipulated by leftists "dog whistles." You're just like a German Shepard, only not as smart.

          • uptownsteve

            I love it. As long as the Rethugs TALK anti-Islamism yet IGNORE terrorist activity they are not responsible. And of course the next white boy who shoots up a school and kills scores of children will just be a "lone nut" with no regard to his race or religion. You righties are insane.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            "I love it. As long as the Rethugs TALK anti-Islamism yet IGNORE terrorist activity they are not responsible."

            Third time might be a charm: "All executives are accountable for their areas of responsibility and expected to perform based on resources available. This includes lessons from history. "

            "And of course the next white boy who shoots up a school and kills scores of children will just be a "lone nut" with no regard to his race or religion."

            Show facts, not wishful thinking. Is there some kind of conspiracy driven by "white ideology" with books published and liars promoting it as a religion? Where is this happening? We discuss facts about Islam and the ideology behind it all. If you want to make a parallel effort you have to stick to the facts. You don't get to make them up in the name of "social justice" just so that "all religions" can be "equal" in your mind.

            "You righties are insane."

            It seems that way to deluded leftists. Its a side-effect of your delusional fantasies.

          • uptownsteve

            All religions are equal racist. You really don't want to get into a tallyboard account of the atrocities committed in the name of Christianity vs Islam. Christians have wiped out entire populations and continents.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            "All religions are equal racist. You really don't want to get into a tallyboard account of the atrocities committed in the name of Christianity vs Islam. "

            Sure I do. Go for it.

            "Christians have wiped out entire populations and continents."

            Right. Waiting for your evidence and "tallyboard."

  • Spider

    “When an event like this happens, we want to review every step that was taken, we want to leave no stone unturned, we want to see if there is in fact additional protocols and procedures that could be put in place that would further improve and enhance our ability to detect a potential attack.’’

    How can you prevent such an attack if we are no longer able to Profile Mu-slims?

    • objectivefactsmatter

      "How can you prevent such an attack if we are no longer able to Profile Mu-slims?"

      I guess his top priority is something other than preventing Islamic terror. It's protecting the international image of Islam and keeping Muslim feelings from being hurt. The easiest path to meet those top objectives is to simply lie as needed.

  • james

    If anyone is paying attention they can see who the haters are, rev wright preaching hate to Jews and whties, farraconvict the panthers sharptongue. all obummers boys the ones that want to rid the country of whites and jews

  • Jaladhi

    There is only one person to be blamed for Boston bombers and other jihadi attacks and you all know who it is. When our government is not prepared to holds Muslims responsible for the jihadi attacks and scrubs all reference to Islamic/Quranic reference to all the violence agaianst all non-Muslims from FBI training manuals, this is what is going to happen and we are seeing it.

    On top of it our media is so stupid, it is beyond any sane person's imagination. These so called journalists have decided to lie about Islam and Muslims and they can never hold Muslims responsible for any violence against us. They justify these jihadi attacks and blame ourselves for it instead of blaming it on the source of it all – Islam, Quran, Muslims, Mo/allah!! Even God cannot save us from Mo/allah and his followers in such inaction on our part, we have to do it ourselves!!

  • Michael

    Mr. Obama here is what happened in Boston. 2 islamic terrorists made home made bombs and killed 3 people and injured hundreds ( some of them that are amputees). They went and killed a cop and had a shoot out with the Boston police. Mr. Obama don't you watch TV or read a newspaper? Don't you have advisors that bring you up to date on ongoing issues. So Mr. Obama if you want to blame someone, blame the Islamic terrorists. Geez who is in charge of the zoo?

    • mlcblog

      He does seem eerily detached.

      • who cares?

        Not when you remember the words contained in the second book published under his name– "if the winds begin to blow in an ugly direction, I will stand with the muslims…" THAT quote at least is probably generated by Obozo himself.

        • mlcblog

          I salute your scholarship. Thank you.

          My blood would run cold at this, but I am busily engaged in making my own American dream happen and encouraging anyone else who will listen.

          I just came from a lunch table of about 12 "mature" women, mostly grandmothers and middle-aged ones, where the topic of the table was the hostess's forum of POLITICS and it's not fair, etc. Awesome.

          This was a mixed group, some twelve-step friends, all mature enough for mingling and mixing socially by now, and she was ever so salty. Kudos!! we need more gatherings like this, where opinions can be aired.

          I chimed in for merit advancement in our schools, as opposed to the handout mentality that I feel and is proven to be so very damaging to individuals and our society.

          p.s. I couldn't believe she was talking politics at a lunch table!! (her house I might add. with obviously people free to leave at any time but they did not), and then I realized this woman is suddenly becoming one of my heroes. She throws these lunches regularly.

          People are free to discuss things. It was amazing to see the very mixed-race group taking in some of our decidedly conservative outrage and ideas!! jaws hanging open. For real.

          I am excited about this way of making a difference.

          • Serge Baruch

            She's served you hallucinogenic mushrooms, hasn't she? It shows.

          • mlcblog

            What? are you going out of your way to be mean? I mentioned nothing about hallucinogenics. I see nothing in your post about the meat of the matters, just a seemingly clever stab at my character.

      • objectivefactsmatter

        "He does seem eerily detached."

        He's busy on his true agenda. His immediate need is plotting revenge against certain senators he sees as traitors to the red-green alliance. That's what gets him emotionally engaged in politics. Or he could be busy working on his golf swing, or placing sports bets. That stuff takes a lot of time too.

        Poor guy. If only he had some tropical location he could get away to some times. That seems fair. Nothing is too good for our transformative leader.

  • David Bellows

    Did they ignore the security memo: "Ethnic Chechens determined to strike?"

    • objectivefactsmatter

      "Did they ignore the security memo: "Ethnic Chechens determined to strike?""

      Any such memo would have to be taken much more seriously after 9-11-2001 if there is any expectation that our leaders learn anything from events along the timeline…for example from life and historical events.

      The only lesson learned recently is that appeasement doesn't work for the appeasers. Not everyone got that memo either.

  • Alvaro

    I think the grand strategy is burying the head in the sand, probably having seen how well it works for ostriches.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      "I think the grand strategy is burying the head in the sand, probably having seen how well it works for ostriches."

      Delusion is wonderful for visualizing the way you want the world to be. After waking from bed, if you don't join the real world you're useless as a leader.

  • Doug Mayfield

    Islam is evil because it demands of its followers that they murder or enslave anyone who disagrees with them, whether Christians, Copts, women, homosexuals, Jews, and of course, the citizens of any free country, particularly America and Israel.

    Until we identify Islam as evil publicly and name it as our enemy as we did Nazi-ism and State Shinto-ism at the start of WW 2, we will accomplish nothing and Americans will continue to be murdered by vicious thugs sent by that evil ideology.

    That Obama has embraced Islam is no surprise. He is an authoritarian and a socialist which makes him and followers of Islam intellectual blood brothers.

  • Attila The Hun

    'Who We Must Blame For Boston?'

    Politically Correct administration who's sole purpose is to whitewash Islamofascism

    • mlcblog

      They have other purposes, too, such as demolishing our lovely civilization and all it stands for.

  • 4_Constitution

    There will be more attacks on American soil in the next four years and I think they will escalate in nature.

  • Cathy

    MUST WATCH: Judge Jeanine’s EPIC smackdown on the mother of the Boston jihadi bombers
    April 27th, 2013 http://www.therightscoop.com/must-watch-judge-jea

    JUDGE JEANINE PIRRO FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!!

  • BLJ

    The Muslim Brotherhood now controls the White House. Everytime I see this traitor wearing an American flag pin on his lapel I want to puke. Thanks much to all the idiots who voted for him (as well as the operatives who help steal the election).

  • marios

    Pres. Dem's despicable Jimmy Carter supported to toppled pro-Western Iran Shah and brought to Power Ayatolah' regime. Now we are under impeding treat Iran with nuclear bomb against us as USA is "Great Satan" for them and our only ally Israel "Little Satan". Sure, against all Western world. Pres. Dem's despicable Bill Clinton policy encouraged Islamo-fascists attack us in our heart NY Trade
    Centers Towers on 9/11. Now Pres. Dem's despicable treacherous Pres. Barack Hussein Obama made all possible our country defended in two wars Iraq and Afghanistan and Boston terrorists act is consequence of his policy as well. Till so-called Dem's which are Shadow Party members or their protégé are in WH and majority in Congress, country will speed to Shariah law Islamic state of USA.
    TREASON!!!

  • Dr.Music

    muslims are totally over-over-overpopulated and heavily socially-suppressed very low order dispensable life forms that know no reason. All this islamic and co-ranic and mo-ronic muslim rage is only making them fearless life forms that know nothing nothing nothing besides the the righteousness to kill any living thing……preferably humans but it seems when in their cages of countries the only option is each other. That’s cool with us.
    They see how the rest of the planet lives and feel the rage of unparalleled jealousy because they are told all that is right is totally wrong. They openly seethe with jealousy in their idiotic and self caged existence. Muslims are the most confused and murderous life forms on the planet exactly like their head honcho of long time ago.
    Television is the culprit…Without TV these seething life-forms would be totally docile and submissive but all this constant good times by humans is very very frustrating for constantly frustrated muslim life-forms. The frustrations have set in since 1400 years…There is no hope for them.
    There is no escape for muslims till they introspect their misguided beliefs of an age that was terrible to live in and to surpass. As soon as muslim introspection starts taking place the top idiots of the cult …the vile clergy will be totally visible and jobless. But this will never happen….muslims are doomed to be muslims. There is no escape from islam.

    “The U.N. is making an arsonist head of the fire department. It defies both morality and common sense.”
    Wishful Thinking………. Get
    with the program……..everybody has to be muslim………this is islam. Planet islam is the goal, The planet flag
    has to be green never mind if its dripping with our blood….ever wonder who
    will be the last humans that will convert to islam ? Those will be Our
    children’s children’s children………..and they will not be ours. islam is
    coming for us and ours. There is no escape from islam. There is no escape from
    islam…….

  • dr.music

    It seems….if you really really really looked hard enough through a very very high powered electron microscope the tiny smallpox viruses also had tiny faces and wore tiny clothes and spoke and thought like muslims in smallpoxese….SO WHAT !!???? No Miranda rights for smallpox !! We wiped them out !! Because they were dangerous for our kids and us . Getting it slowly slowly ?

    It seems…..islam is very bad
    for humans….like small pox was…. islam is actually mohammad's madness being
    parroted and aped and being inserted into humans so they can not
    progress beyond mohammad's madness…..a sane and logical human will not be allowed to emerge out of islam by islam….to acknowledge that mohammad was truly mad is considered blasphemy nowadays spelt as blastphemy….. Firstmadmuslim mohammad did not even know the meanings of the
    words he used…like humanity and honor and compassion and such….a classic
    case of an absolute idiot. 2 billion…and coming….upside down.

    A mad man is actually an
    ape….if you aren't a normal human mentally you have to be an ape. Therefore
    since mohammad was mad and apeish all normal humans born into this mad man's
    cult just have to ape the first muslim ape a.k.a. mohammad the violent
    hallucinator and mental screw-up. islam is very bad for normal humans. period.
    understood ???

    It seems…..even after living
    through the past couple of decades, to still believe Islam is the religion of
    peace is to be as credulous as believing North Korea is a democracy run by the
    people.

    The modern day Thugee is
    islam……look up Thugee on the net…Thugee was a type of islam type of
    cult practised by some hindus…which
    the sensible British wiped out and off the face of this earth….super good for
    Great Britain….. Idiotic islam has to be dealt with the same way that idiotic
    thugee was dealt with. Till the last person practicing dirty dirty islam is
    wiped off the face of this earth we will have no peace. Dirty islam was started
    by a perverted thug and pedophilic mass murderer and slave owner and mentally
    sick man who was so sick he scared the stupid arabs that lived in the desert
    and this unfortunate coward legacy is still the paramount problem on planet
    EARTH. We have to deal with islam the same way we have dealt with dirty thugee
    and small pox.

    The dirty cult of islam has
    been naively misclassified as a religion by educated people ( this time the
    British screwed up) who could not justifiably read the gutter language that is
    arabic. Dirty arabic has no word for a pedophile or a child-molester. Dirty
    islam and dirty filthy arabic are the two number one enemies of peace and human and human-scientific progress on this planet. We have to get rid of dirty islam just as we got rid of Thugee…with guts to say the right things and with heavy modern day weaponry….it seems with FINALITY !!

    Fkall islam is a drag on the planet.
    The carbon footprint of obviously stupid and idiotic islam is too big and bloody to be ignored. Soon everybody on the planet will have lost someone to islam's murderous mayhem. islam should not be tolerated anywhere on the planet. Period.
    2 billion less will be a good
    thing for the planet and science and the fine arts.
    life will thrive post islam.
    no one'll miss muslims and
    their funny only 1400 year old terrifying constant freak-show cult called islam
    ?
    any answers ?
    It seems…..Crocodile tears are an art form
    too…..Crocodile tears are an art-form
    too…..Crocodile tears are an art-form
    too…..
    It seems….Earth does not need an idiotic
    and chaotic and pedophilic and totally retrograde cult that is totally
    mislabeled as a religion by people who could not read stupid filthy uncouth
    arabic. A true gutter-language . Stupid dirty gutter-language arabic and islam have no words for a
    pedophile or a child-molester. The arabs are not fit enough to be called human.
    islam is as cruel and useless as smallpox…..The time is right to do what has to be
    done. NOW!!
    Things have to start moving in
    this direction. It seems ….

  • Suzanne

    Obama's policiy on the Islamic issue IS miserable but I have to say that I was not all that impressed with George Bush's either. Is this STILL all about oil? Is this why we are still pandering to these Islamic nations? It must be because I can't think of any other reason. Why are we not energy independent by now? Remember the gas lines in the 1970's? Obama seems in denial and makes huge blunders everywhere over some pipe dream called the "Arab spring". However Bush was always calling Islam "a religion of peace". Neither ever sealed our borders and neither stopped student visas for foreign Muslim students. I think that a lot of Americans are waking up to the fact that Muslims are not fit to be in this country. They are beginning to understand that they have a warrior religion that is serious about taking over the world. (It took us long enough) Personally, I believe that Muslims should have never been allowed in this country in the first place because their religion makes it impossible for them to uphold the Constitution. I didn't realize that until after 9/11 but thanks to brave people like Robert Spenser I read up on his work and did my homework. But it shouldn't have been ME that was doing the homework, our government should have been up on this way, way, way long ago (decades before 9/11). After all our government's first duty is to PROTECT us. Twelve years after 9/11, I'm feeling really let down by our government on this.

  • marios

    Pres. W Bush and Barack Hussein Obama are incomparable. Pres. W Bush was Patriot of America, decent person who loved this country and did what he believed good for this country. He made some mistakes but name at least one Pres. who did not make any mistake. None, I believe. Financed by the Shadow Party and controlled by them and their franchise Dem's party MSM instilled on gullible people that he was monster, fool, etc. ALL is LIE. If Obama made something not harmful for this year it was what G W Bush did and he just continued. BHO is MB proxy. Remember that he said in his Cairo speech that USA was that biggest Muslims country, that Muslims made great contribution for this country prosperity… It is outrageous LIE. Thanks to corrupted, biased, despicable MSM the most people don't remember it.

  • Mladen Andrijasevic

    The other is that the FBI had no idea how to tell whether or not Tamerlan Tsarnaev was “engaging in extremist activity,” because the “extremist activity” he was engaging in was Islamic jihad, and Obama’s FBI is forbidden to study Islamic jihad. This is because the Obama Administration in 2011 mandated thescrubbing of counter-terror training materials of the truth about Islam and jihad. It is the terror threat that dare not speak its name.

    THE PRINCIPLES OF NEWSPEAK

    The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc, but to make all other modes of thought impossible. It was intended that when Newspeak had been adopted once and for all and Oldspeak forgotten, a heretical thought — that is, a thought diverging from the principles of Ingsoc — should be literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought is dependent on words. Its vocabulary was so constructed as to give exact and often very subtle expression to every meaning that a Party member could properly wish to express, while excluding all other meanings and also the possibility of arriving at them by indirect methods. This was done partly by the invention of new words, but chiefly by eliminating undesirable words and by stripping such words as remained of unorthodox meanings, and so far as possible of all secondary meanings whatever. To give a single example. The word free still existed in Newspeak, but it could only be used in such statements as ‘This dog is free from lice’ or ‘This field is free from weeds’. It could not be used in its old sense of ‘politically free’ or ‘intellectually free’ since political and intellectual freedom no longer existed even as concepts, and were therefore of necessity nameless. Quite apart from the suppression of definitely heretical words, reduction of vocabulary was regarded as an end in itself, and no word that could be dispensed with was allowed to survive. Newspeak was designed not to extend but to diminish the range of thought, and this purpose was indirectly assisted by cutting the choice of words down to a minimum.

    It was impossible to translate any passage of Oldspeak into Newspeak unless it either referred to some technical process or some very simple everyday action, or was already orthodox (goodthinkful would be the Newspeak expression) in tendency. In practice this meant that no book written before approximately 1960 could be translated as a whole. Pre-revolutionary literature could only be subjected to ideological translation — that is, alteration in sense as well as language. Take for example the well-known passage from the Declaration of Independence:
    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among men, deriving their powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of those ends, it is the right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government…

    It would have been quite impossible to render this into Newspeak while keeping to the sense of the original. The nearest one could come to doing so would be to swallow the whole passage up in the single word crimethink. A full translation could only be an ideological translation, whereby Jefferson's words would be changed into a panegyric on absolute government.

  • Jim_C

    I've been on this site a long time. Long enough to remember when this site blamed Bill Clinton for 9/11, even though Bush was in office and the bureaucrats supposedly asleep at the wheel, covering their A's, or ignoring info were his appointees.

    Since then FPM has only rarely failed in its intellectual dishonest partisanship and amoral rationalizations. If it comes from a liberal, it is categorically wrong. If it comes from a conservative–well, "nobody's perfect!" I applaud FPM for this article–a real return to form.

    • reader

      Speaking about intellectual dishonesty. Did you read the 9-11 Report, Jim? If you really were interested in reality, you would. And if you did, you'd find out about the Gorelik Memo, even though 9-11 report was thoroughly doctored by the Dem members serving on it mostly to whitewash Clinton's cabinet and State Department paper pushers' meddling with law enforcement agencies. Erik Holder is Janet Reno on steroids with race chip on his shoulder.

      • Jim_C

        You're right, reader. It's never the right's fault and always all the left's fault–that's the only intellectual honesty you require! From there, it's just pick the items that work for you, ignore the ones that don't.

  • Brujo Blanco

    The key issue has been identified. The refusal to identify Islamic terrorists for what they are is the danger. If we do not acknowledge a problem then we do not have a problem. We cannot defeat an enemy that we will not identify.

  • Cathy

    Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas is my choice for President in 2016!! David Horowitz should extend this Congressman a gold engraved invitation to the upcoming Texas Weekend. This capital C Conservative is not a PC Islamic appeaser.

    Both of the following articles are a GREAT read. IMO

    Congressman: Team Obama botched bombing probe
    ‘Concern should have been to get more information about threat against America’
    Published: 6 days ago http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/congressman-team-obama

    Bombing shows immigration flaws: Rep. Louie Gohmert
    Granting 11 million people legal status not the answer
    April 29, 2013 http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2013/04/29/

  • Herb Benty

    Obama is a 5th column President, enemy of not only Christians and Jews, Obama is an enemy of GOD, no wonder why this evil world loves him.

    • slider 96

      God tell ya that Herb ? How come God doesn't just snuff him out ? Why did God let him win the election Herb ? Got any ideas ?

      • objectivefactsmatter

        "God tell ya that Herb ? How come God doesn't just snuff him out ? Why did God let him win the election Herb ? Got any ideas ?"

        You're questions are irrational.

  • Shane

    Obama and Bush share the blame. This Jihadist family should never have been allowed to immigrate into the USA, but Bush let them in. Obama has forced our national security forces to ignore the connection between Islamic Jihad and terrorism. What a jerk.

  • slider 96

    Here's why you picked the wrong horse Bob –
    The New Hampshire state legislator who has said the federal government caused the Boston Marathon bombing claimed proof in a victim who lost both legs and “was not in pain.”

    State Rep. Stella Tremblay (R-Auburn) told a conservative talk show host Tuesday that she knows the federal government was behind the attacks because Jeff Bauman, a bombing victim who helped identify the suspects, was not “screaming in agony” after both his legs were blown off. Tremblay made the comments on The Pete Santilli Show, first reported by miscellanyblue.com, a liberal-leaning website, on Wednesday.

    “Then, my first gut reaction seeing the horror of that person that has their legs blown off,” Tremblay said. “You know, the bone sticking out? He was not in shock. I looked and I thought, there’s something. … I don’t know what’s wrong, but it seems surreal to me. I talked to my sister, who’s not into politics at all, and she said, ‘Yes, I saw the same thing.’ He was not in shock. He was not in pain. If I had had those type of injuries, I’d be screaming in agony.”

    cont'd-

  • slider 96

    Tremblay, a tea party member with ties to the birther movement, made the remarks about Bauman after causing a stir with her marathon bombing government conspiracy theory. She said photos of the bombing showed intact backpacks, which she said should have been destroyed if they contained bombs. Last week, she posted a comment on Glenn Beck’s Facebook page saying the federal government caused the bombing. She has resisted calls to resign over the post.

    Bob Spencer , your tops in your field , and you have an important message , but you lose your credibility when you hook up with these insane losers known as the Tea Party . This infantile and utterly ludicrous rant ,which is typical Tea party repertoire simply diminishes you .
    I'll guarantee you Bob , there 'll be loons here that will support the above totally ignorant and stupid staement that was mnade by this Tea Party wizard .

  • slider 96

    It's really a shame Spencer , you actually make that shiithead Charles Johnson over at LGF look credible when you cast your lot with these loons .