<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Soviet Intelligence Promoted Christian Marxism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 21:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: John McArthur</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-5447745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John McArthur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2014 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=206137#comment-5447745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;&quot;The third leg was promoting an anti-capitalist, anti-Western brand of Christianity. If the KGB could not eliminate Christianity, it reasoned it might as well manipulate it. Liberation Theology was born.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Religious communism was how the early Christians lived according to Acts of the Apostles:
Acts 4:32–35, &quot;All the believers were one in heart and mind. No one claimed that any of his possessions was his own, but they shared everything they had...&quot;

Acts 2:42–47, &quot;all the believers were together and held everything in common...&quot;

The complaints regarding Pius XII response to Hitler and the Nazi&#039;s didn&#039;t begin with any dirty tricks campaign of the Soviets. During the war both American and British diplomats were pressing him to speak out about moral outrages that were taking place and that if he didn&#039;t it would result in loss of moral prestige for the papacy. In 1951 French Catholic intellectual, François Mauriac, wrote  &lt;i&gt;&quot;we never had the comfort of hearing the successor of Galilee, Simon Peter, [i.e Pius XII] use clear and precise words, rather than diplomatic allusions, to condemn the countless crucifixions of the &#039;brothers of the Lord&#039; [i.e. Jewish people]&quot;&lt;/i&gt;



This issue didn&#039;t begin with &quot;The Deputy&quot; though it certainly ignited the modern debate and placed it in the popular press. The rights and wrongs of political neutrality in the face of moral outrages, and using carefully worded diplomacy when dealing with madmen, is another issue but to cover it all under a blanket of claimed Soviet dirty tricks is to distort history.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;The third leg was promoting an anti-capitalist, anti-Western brand of Christianity. If the KGB could not eliminate Christianity, it reasoned it might as well manipulate it. Liberation Theology was born.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Religious communism was how the early Christians lived according to Acts of the Apostles:<br />
Acts 4:32–35, &#8220;All the believers were one in heart and mind. No one claimed that any of his possessions was his own, but they shared everything they had&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Acts 2:42–47, &#8220;all the believers were together and held everything in common&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>The complaints regarding Pius XII response to Hitler and the Nazi&#8217;s didn&#8217;t begin with any dirty tricks campaign of the Soviets. During the war both American and British diplomats were pressing him to speak out about moral outrages that were taking place and that if he didn&#8217;t it would result in loss of moral prestige for the papacy. In 1951 French Catholic intellectual, François Mauriac, wrote  <i>&#8220;we never had the comfort of hearing the successor of Galilee, Simon Peter, [i.e Pius XII] use clear and precise words, rather than diplomatic allusions, to condemn the countless crucifixions of the &#8216;brothers of the Lord&#8217; [i.e. Jewish people]&#8220;</i></p>
<p>This issue didn&#8217;t begin with &#8220;The Deputy&#8221; though it certainly ignited the modern debate and placed it in the popular press. The rights and wrongs of political neutrality in the face of moral outrages, and using carefully worded diplomacy when dealing with madmen, is another issue but to cover it all under a blanket of claimed Soviet dirty tricks is to distort history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Santosh seo</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-5358565</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Santosh seo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2014 09:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=206137#comment-5358565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your great information, the contents are quiet interesting.I will be waiting for your next post.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.win-at-chess.com/chess-beginners/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chess beginners&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your great information, the contents are quiet interesting.I will be waiting for your next post.<br />
<a href="http://www.win-at-chess.com/chess-beginners/" rel="nofollow">chess beginners</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-5300675</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Milan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 17:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=206137#comment-5300675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, you know so much ....which is wrong. Intelligent moron.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, you know so much &#8230;.which is wrong. Intelligent moron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simplynotred</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-5331746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[simplynotred]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 01:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=206137#comment-5331746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is only one of the seven deadly sins. ONLY ONE, Communist do not aspire but promote the other six to  indicated that using the other six is OK yet suggest that ONLY ONE is bad. PRIDE of the Communist! PRIDE is the worst, for the Communist have the arrogance, even hubris to believe beyond hope that only by getting rid of Greed will the world be a paradise. 


Never will be, as long the human condition is completely fixed by the true Grace of God or removed from the planet. Humans have Pride, Envy, Gluttony, Lust, Anger and Sloth aside from Greed. So the pope Francis is nothing more than a Communist in sheep&#039;s clothing. A wolf sort to speak, who promotes the other six deadly sins. Communist use all these six sins which sends them to hell quicker than those who suffer from the sin of Greed. 



Francis is a liar, and a murdered for he uses all seven sins and commits all seven sins by promoting six, as if he knows better than God Himself. Francis is your fool, for the Communists need fools to promote their death trap for so many souls. The hatred of Greed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is only one of the seven deadly sins. ONLY ONE, Communist do not aspire but promote the other six to  indicated that using the other six is OK yet suggest that ONLY ONE is bad. PRIDE of the Communist! PRIDE is the worst, for the Communist have the arrogance, even hubris to believe beyond hope that only by getting rid of Greed will the world be a paradise. </p>
<p>Never will be, as long the human condition is completely fixed by the true Grace of God or removed from the planet. Humans have Pride, Envy, Gluttony, Lust, Anger and Sloth aside from Greed. So the pope Francis is nothing more than a Communist in sheep&#8217;s clothing. A wolf sort to speak, who promotes the other six deadly sins. Communist use all these six sins which sends them to hell quicker than those who suffer from the sin of Greed. </p>
<p>Francis is a liar, and a murdered for he uses all seven sins and commits all seven sins by promoting six, as if he knows better than God Himself. Francis is your fool, for the Communists need fools to promote their death trap for so many souls. The hatred of Greed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy_Cam</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-5292043</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy_Cam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=206137#comment-5292043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t agree that the pope&#039;s POV re greed is wrong. It is right. Commies and others jump on this, but the right has always had a problem condemning greed, a Cardinal sin. That is, a sin upon which other sins &quot;hinge&quot;, hence the name &quot;cardinal&quot;, from &quot;cardines&quot; in Latin for &quot;hinge&quot;.


Now, what about &quot;easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get into heaven&quot;.


Did Jesus forget to study market economics? 


Greed is real. Greed is evil. Greed is the irrational and soul-cancelling, value-cancelling value that Adam Smith, an Enlightenment Christian, saw as violating the &quot;invisible hand&quot; because the only way the market could work to optimize itself and the society that used it was for people to use the Golden Rule in their use of wealth and business transactions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t agree that the pope&#8217;s POV re greed is wrong. It is right. Commies and others jump on this, but the right has always had a problem condemning greed, a Cardinal sin. That is, a sin upon which other sins &#8220;hinge&#8221;, hence the name &#8220;cardinal&#8221;, from &#8220;cardines&#8221; in Latin for &#8220;hinge&#8221;.</p>
<p>Now, what about &#8220;easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get into heaven&#8221;.</p>
<p>Did Jesus forget to study market economics? </p>
<p>Greed is real. Greed is evil. Greed is the irrational and soul-cancelling, value-cancelling value that Adam Smith, an Enlightenment Christian, saw as violating the &#8220;invisible hand&#8221; because the only way the market could work to optimize itself and the society that used it was for people to use the Golden Rule in their use of wealth and business transactions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-5290786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stephen thompson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=206137#comment-5290786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jews ARE the Communists, Communism is nothing more than Babylonian Talmudic Judaism in disguise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jews ARE the Communists, Communism is nothing more than Babylonian Talmudic Judaism in disguise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Black</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-5289100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry Black]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=206137#comment-5289100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Foolster41 fails to notice that the policies he advocates have awful real life consequences for women. Shuttering Planned Parenthood, which is mainly in the business of providing reproductive health services, deprives women of needed health care. Banning abortion in the second and third trimester, banning abortion in the case of rape or incest or if the mother&#039;s life is in danger--these policies are monstrous and misogynistic. The  anti-abortion fanatics don&#039;t give a damn about women&#039;s health or survival or the health of the fetus once it becomes a child. While we might argue about whether or when the fetus has a soul or is a human, there is no arguing about the lives of actual, living women, which these new Republican laws write off.  

       As for the level of discourse here: since I consistently oppose the Tea Party-anti-abortion line, I&#039;ve been vilified and abused again and again.   I have not attacked Foolster41 in this way. But since this non-conversation is coming to an end, I will say that he  has simply replayed the same old pro-abortion tape. Yes, Margaret Sanger&#039;s enthusiasm for euthanasia was vile, but it&#039;s irrelevant to the lives of women today.  

       And to return to my original point: because the Republicans are conducting a war on women, they are losing the women&#039;s vote along with the votes of immigrants, the poor, and minorities. Since they can&#039;t win a majority, they resort to manipulative, anti-democratic tactics: gerrymandering, voter suppression, and now holding the world economy
hostage in an attempt to undermine settled law and the Constitution.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foolster41 fails to notice that the policies he advocates have awful real life consequences for women. Shuttering Planned Parenthood, which is mainly in the business of providing reproductive health services, deprives women of needed health care. Banning abortion in the second and third trimester, banning abortion in the case of rape or incest or if the mother&#8217;s life is in danger&#8211;these policies are monstrous and misogynistic. The  anti-abortion fanatics don&#8217;t give a damn about women&#8217;s health or survival or the health of the fetus once it becomes a child. While we might argue about whether or when the fetus has a soul or is a human, there is no arguing about the lives of actual, living women, which these new Republican laws write off.  </p>
<p>       As for the level of discourse here: since I consistently oppose the Tea Party-anti-abortion line, I&#8217;ve been vilified and abused again and again.   I have not attacked Foolster41 in this way. But since this non-conversation is coming to an end, I will say that he  has simply replayed the same old pro-abortion tape. Yes, Margaret Sanger&#8217;s enthusiasm for euthanasia was vile, but it&#8217;s irrelevant to the lives of women today.  </p>
<p>       And to return to my original point: because the Republicans are conducting a war on women, they are losing the women&#8217;s vote along with the votes of immigrants, the poor, and minorities. Since they can&#8217;t win a majority, they resort to manipulative, anti-democratic tactics: gerrymandering, voter suppression, and now holding the world economy<br />
hostage in an attempt to undermine settled law and the Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Black</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-5289095</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry Black]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=206137#comment-5289095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Foolster41 fails to notice that the policies he advocates have awful real life consequences for women. Shuttering Planned Parenthood, which is mainly in the business of providing reproductive health services, deprives women of needed health care. Banning abortion in the second and third trimester, banning abortion in the case of rape or incest or if the mother&#039;s life is in danger--these policies are monstrous and misogynistic. The anti-abortion fanatics don&#039;t give a damn about women&#039;s health or survival or the health of the fetus once it becomes a child. While we might argue about whether or when the fetus has a soul or is a human, there is no arguing about the lives of actual, living women, which these new Republican laws write off.  

       As for the level of discourse here: since I consistently oppose the Tea Party-anti-abortion line, I&#039;ve been vilified and abused again and again.   I have not attacked Foolster41 in this way. But since this non-conversation is coming to an end, I will say that he  has simply replayed the same old pro-abortion tape. Yes, Margaret Sanger&#039;s enthusiasm for euthanasia was vile, but it&#039;s irrelevant to the lives of women today.  

       And to return to my original point: because the Republicans are conducting a war on women, they are losing the women&#039;s vote along with the votes of immigrants, the poor, and minorities. Since they can&#039;t win a majority, they resort to manipulative, anti-democratic tactics: gerrymandering, voter suppression, and now holding the world economy hostage in an attempt to undermine settled law and the Constitution.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foolster41 fails to notice that the policies he advocates have awful real life consequences for women. Shuttering Planned Parenthood, which is mainly in the business of providing reproductive health services, deprives women of needed health care. Banning abortion in the second and third trimester, banning abortion in the case of rape or incest or if the mother&#8217;s life is in danger&#8211;these policies are monstrous and misogynistic. The anti-abortion fanatics don&#8217;t give a damn about women&#8217;s health or survival or the health of the fetus once it becomes a child. While we might argue about whether or when the fetus has a soul or is a human, there is no arguing about the lives of actual, living women, which these new Republican laws write off.  </p>
<p>       As for the level of discourse here: since I consistently oppose the Tea Party-anti-abortion line, I&#8217;ve been vilified and abused again and again.   I have not attacked Foolster41 in this way. But since this non-conversation is coming to an end, I will say that he  has simply replayed the same old pro-abortion tape. Yes, Margaret Sanger&#8217;s enthusiasm for euthanasia was vile, but it&#8217;s irrelevant to the lives of women today.  </p>
<p>       And to return to my original point: because the Republicans are conducting a war on women, they are losing the women&#8217;s vote along with the votes of immigrants, the poor, and minorities. Since they can&#8217;t win a majority, they resort to manipulative, anti-democratic tactics: gerrymandering, voter suppression, and now holding the world economy hostage in an attempt to undermine settled law and the Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-5289019</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[El Mac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 06:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=206137#comment-5289019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well said Harry Gosset.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Harry Gosset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-5289017</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[El Mac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 06:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=206137#comment-5289017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You a simple hater.  No more, no less.  Well....boring then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You a simple hater.  No more, no less.  Well&#8230;.boring then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-5289015</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[El Mac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 06:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=206137#comment-5289015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spoken like a true commie.  How original.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spoken like a true commie.  How original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foolster41</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-5289009</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foolster41]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 05:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=206137#comment-5289009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One: You might notice I&#039;m not double posting. All I&#039;m saying is a little care can prevent that. 

Two, I&#039;m done. Ladies and Gentlemen, observe. 
Mr. Black seems to be fixed on demonizing people who dare to disagree with him. He is what&#039;s wrong with politics today. Not because of his views on abortion, but how he goes about discussing it. He ignores any legitimate reason for opposing Abortion (i.e. seeing a fetus as a life) and instead says that being against abortion is enough proof of an action to be called a mysoginist. Period. If you think Abortion is wrong, because a fetus is a life you hate women.

Here&#039;s my point of view:
If you are against abortion, you are not a monster.
If you are for abortions, you are not a monster. 
See, the difference between us? Again, this is my only point of contention with Mr. Black. I&#039;m not arguing whether abortion is wrong or not, only saying that people who are for or against abortion hate women is wrong. 

Also, since Mr. Black mentions planned parenthood being &quot;attacked&quot; (i.e. that&#039;s his rhetorical way of saying &quot;being opposed to&quot;, but only when people he disagrees with do it, it&#039;s not &quot;attacking&quot; if he criticizes anti-abortionists or republicans don&#039;tchaknow) he might want to educate himself on it&#039;s history. It was founded on the racist ideals of eugenics (a point of interest since he&#039;s so against slavery). A woman named Margret Sanger who founded PP said &quot;Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.&quot;

&quot;[We should] apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.&quot;

Whether or not you are are for abortion, shouldn&#039;t such vile ideals be &quot;attacked&quot; (&quot;strongly speak out against, and oppose&quot;)?

He cites women&#039;s health, but unless I&#039;m mistaken only a small minority are against complete removal of abortion in cases of health crisis. And indeed, they see it also as a female health at risk, the life of a child, so this is a red herring to try to make out anti-abortion people as putting women at risk. 

If he once again posts the same thing once again (all his posts have the same message: if you are against abortions, you hate women) I won&#039;t be responding. I&#039;m done with these circles, but I&#039;ll leave you with a song:

Soul Coughing - Circles (Album: El Oso, 1998)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEFQTY4hjUk]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One: You might notice I&#8217;m not double posting. All I&#8217;m saying is a little care can prevent that. </p>
<p>Two, I&#8217;m done. Ladies and Gentlemen, observe.<br />
Mr. Black seems to be fixed on demonizing people who dare to disagree with him. He is what&#8217;s wrong with politics today. Not because of his views on abortion, but how he goes about discussing it. He ignores any legitimate reason for opposing Abortion (i.e. seeing a fetus as a life) and instead says that being against abortion is enough proof of an action to be called a mysoginist. Period. If you think Abortion is wrong, because a fetus is a life you hate women.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my point of view:<br />
If you are against abortion, you are not a monster.<br />
If you are for abortions, you are not a monster.<br />
See, the difference between us? Again, this is my only point of contention with Mr. Black. I&#8217;m not arguing whether abortion is wrong or not, only saying that people who are for or against abortion hate women is wrong. </p>
<p>Also, since Mr. Black mentions planned parenthood being &#8220;attacked&#8221; (i.e. that&#8217;s his rhetorical way of saying &#8220;being opposed to&#8221;, but only when people he disagrees with do it, it&#8217;s not &#8220;attacking&#8221; if he criticizes anti-abortionists or republicans don&#8217;tchaknow) he might want to educate himself on it&#8217;s history. It was founded on the racist ideals of eugenics (a point of interest since he&#8217;s so against slavery). A woman named Margret Sanger who founded PP said &#8220;Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;[We should] apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.&#8221;</p>
<p>Whether or not you are are for abortion, shouldn&#8217;t such vile ideals be &#8220;attacked&#8221; (&#8220;strongly speak out against, and oppose&#8221;)?</p>
<p>He cites women&#8217;s health, but unless I&#8217;m mistaken only a small minority are against complete removal of abortion in cases of health crisis. And indeed, they see it also as a female health at risk, the life of a child, so this is a red herring to try to make out anti-abortion people as putting women at risk. </p>
<p>If he once again posts the same thing once again (all his posts have the same message: if you are against abortions, you hate women) I won&#8217;t be responding. I&#8217;m done with these circles, but I&#8217;ll leave you with a song:</p>
<p>Soul Coughing &#8211; Circles (Album: El Oso, 1998)<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEFQTY4hjUk" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEFQTY4hjUk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Black</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-5288990</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry Black]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 05:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=206137#comment-5288990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One: multiple posts because it seems my posts were
not going through. Two: you can claim I&#039;m simply &quot;demonizing people,&quot; but people earn their reputations through their actions.  For a large percentage of American women, what the Republicans have been doing constitutes misogyny and a war on women. We should be clear:  women&#039;s lives are at stake.  This is  not simply a question of semantics. The right wing&#039;s nationwide attack on Planned Parenthood, to cite but one of many instances, has had grave consequences for women&#039;s health. The word
&quot;misogyny&quot; is mild when it comes to characterizing the behavior of the anti-abortion fanatics. I would also use the word &quot;criminal.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One: multiple posts because it seems my posts were<br />
not going through. Two: you can claim I&#8217;m simply &#8220;demonizing people,&#8221; but people earn their reputations through their actions.  For a large percentage of American women, what the Republicans have been doing constitutes misogyny and a war on women. We should be clear:  women&#8217;s lives are at stake.  This is  not simply a question of semantics. The right wing&#8217;s nationwide attack on Planned Parenthood, to cite but one of many instances, has had grave consequences for women&#8217;s health. The word<br />
&#8220;misogyny&#8221; is mild when it comes to characterizing the behavior of the anti-abortion fanatics. I would also use the word &#8220;criminal.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Black</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-5288956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry Black]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 03:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=206137#comment-5288956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One: multiple posts because it seems my posts were
not going through. Two: you can claim I&#039;m simply &quot;demonizing people,&quot; but people earn their reputations through their actions.  For a large percentage of American women, what the Republicans have been doing constitutes misogyny and a war on women. We should be clear:  women&#039;s lives are at stake.  This is  not simply a question of semantics. The right wing&#039;s nationwide attack on Planned Parenthood, to cite but one of many instances, has had grave consequences for women&#039;s health. The word
&quot;misogyny&quot; is mild when it comes to characterizing the behavior of the anti-abortion fanatics. I would also use the word &quot;criminal.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One: multiple posts because it seems my posts were<br />
not going through. Two: you can claim I&#8217;m simply &#8220;demonizing people,&#8221; but people earn their reputations through their actions.  For a large percentage of American women, what the Republicans have been doing constitutes misogyny and a war on women. We should be clear:  women&#8217;s lives are at stake.  This is  not simply a question of semantics. The right wing&#8217;s nationwide attack on Planned Parenthood, to cite but one of many instances, has had grave consequences for women&#8217;s health. The word<br />
&#8220;misogyny&#8221; is mild when it comes to characterizing the behavior of the anti-abortion fanatics. I would also use the word &#8220;criminal.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Black</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-5288920</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry Black]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 02:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=206137#comment-5288920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One: multiple posts because it seems my posts were not going through. Two: you can claim I&#039;m simply &quot;demonizing people,&quot; but people earn their reputations through their actions.  For a large percentage of American women, what the Republicans have been doing constitutes misogyny and a war on women. We should be clear:  women&#039;s lives are at stake.  This is  not simply a question of semantics. The right wing&#039;s nationwide attack on Planned Parenthood, to cite but one of many instances, has had grave consequences for women&#039;s health. The word &quot;misogyny&quot; is mild when it comes to characterizing the behavior of the anti-abortion fanatics. I would also use the word &quot;criminal.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One: multiple posts because it seems my posts were not going through. Two: you can claim I&#8217;m simply &#8220;demonizing people,&#8221; but people earn their reputations through their actions.  For a large percentage of American women, what the Republicans have been doing constitutes misogyny and a war on women. We should be clear:  women&#8217;s lives are at stake.  This is  not simply a question of semantics. The right wing&#8217;s nationwide attack on Planned Parenthood, to cite but one of many instances, has had grave consequences for women&#8217;s health. The word &#8220;misogyny&#8221; is mild when it comes to characterizing the behavior of the anti-abortion fanatics. I would also use the word &#8220;criminal.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foolster41</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-5288907</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foolster41]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 01:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=206137#comment-5288907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One: please stop posting mutliple posts. It&#039;s annoying. (I realize you&#039;re probably not doing it on purpose, but please check to make sure a post went through before trying again)

Two: Fine. perhaps the ultrasound is unnecessary and bad. That&#039;s not really the point I&#039;m making. I might be more inclined to agree with you that ultrasounds are bad, if that were the only thing you were saying. But you say that &quot;more than some&quot; those who are anti-abortion do so because they hate women, and those in the &quot;honest disagreement&quot; actually wish women couldn&#039;t vote and hate women because they oppose abortions. For one thing, unless you are a psychic or very gifted psychologists, there&#039;s no way for you to really know that. 

Also, whether or not I think abortion is right, I&#039;m going to oppose you on your demonetization of people because they disagree with you. It&#039;s not hate to be opposed to abortion. It&#039;s not hate to be for abortions. People should discuss the issues, not demonize. Plain and simple, you are slandering people because they disagree with you. It&#039;s childish. 

Also, there is very little difference between men and women who favor or oppose abortions[1], so make this an issue of gender lines is outright wrong. The issue those who oppose abortions isn&#039;t because they want to deny women a right, or have power over them, but because they feel it is not a positive right (like voting, which doesn&#039;t deny anyone else&#039;s rights), but it denies the right of an unborn child. A person who is pro-abortion can show how they are wrong in this (i.e. show how a fetus is not a person), but that is difference than saying they hate women. 

[1]http://www.gallup.com/poll/127559/education-trumps-gender-predicting-support-abortion.aspx]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One: please stop posting mutliple posts. It&#8217;s annoying. (I realize you&#8217;re probably not doing it on purpose, but please check to make sure a post went through before trying again)</p>
<p>Two: Fine. perhaps the ultrasound is unnecessary and bad. That&#8217;s not really the point I&#8217;m making. I might be more inclined to agree with you that ultrasounds are bad, if that were the only thing you were saying. But you say that &#8220;more than some&#8221; those who are anti-abortion do so because they hate women, and those in the &#8220;honest disagreement&#8221; actually wish women couldn&#8217;t vote and hate women because they oppose abortions. For one thing, unless you are a psychic or very gifted psychologists, there&#8217;s no way for you to really know that. </p>
<p>Also, whether or not I think abortion is right, I&#8217;m going to oppose you on your demonetization of people because they disagree with you. It&#8217;s not hate to be opposed to abortion. It&#8217;s not hate to be for abortions. People should discuss the issues, not demonize. Plain and simple, you are slandering people because they disagree with you. It&#8217;s childish. </p>
<p>Also, there is very little difference between men and women who favor or oppose abortions[1], so make this an issue of gender lines is outright wrong. The issue those who oppose abortions isn&#8217;t because they want to deny women a right, or have power over them, but because they feel it is not a positive right (like voting, which doesn&#8217;t deny anyone else&#8217;s rights), but it denies the right of an unborn child. A person who is pro-abortion can show how they are wrong in this (i.e. show how a fetus is not a person), but that is difference than saying they hate women. </p>
<p>[1]http://www.gallup.com/poll/127559/education-trumps-gender-predicting-support-abortion.aspx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Black</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-5288885</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry Black]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=206137#comment-5288885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You really have to hate women to vote into law the
requirement that women undergo an invasive ultrasound in order qualify for an abortion. That&#039;s sadistic and unnecessary even if you oppose abortion. There&#039;s a name for those who write and vote for such laws: misogynists.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really have to hate women to vote into law the<br />
requirement that women undergo an invasive ultrasound in order qualify for an abortion. That&#8217;s sadistic and unnecessary even if you oppose abortion. There&#8217;s a name for those who write and vote for such laws: misogynists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Black</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-5288852</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry Black]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=206137#comment-5288852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You really have to hate women to vote into law the
requirement that women undergo an invasive ultrasound in order qualify for an abortion. That&#039;s sadistic and unnecessary even if you oppose abortion.There&#039;s a name for those who write and vote for such laws: misogynists.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really have to hate women to vote into law the<br />
requirement that women undergo an invasive ultrasound in order qualify for an abortion. That&#8217;s sadistic and unnecessary even if you oppose abortion.There&#8217;s a name for those who write and vote for such laws: misogynists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Black</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-5288837</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry Black]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=206137#comment-5288837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You really have to hate women to vote into law the
requirement that women undergo a transv*gin*l ultrasound in order qualify for an abortion. That&#039;s sadistic and unnecessary even if you oppose abortion. There&#039;s a name for those who write and vote for such laws: misogynists.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really have to hate women to vote into law the<br />
requirement that women undergo a transv*gin*l ultrasound in order qualify for an abortion. That&#8217;s sadistic and unnecessary even if you oppose abortion. There&#8217;s a name for those who write and vote for such laws: misogynists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Black</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ryan-mauro/how-soviet-intelligence-promoted-christian-marxism/comment-page-1/#comment-5288829</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry Black]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=206137#comment-5288829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You really have to hate women to vote into law the requirement that women undergo a transvaginal ultrasound in order qualify for an abortion. That&#039;s sadistic and unnecessary even if you oppose abortion. There&#039;s a name for those who write and vote for such laws: misogynists.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really have to hate women to vote into law the requirement that women undergo a transvaginal ultrasound in order qualify for an abortion. That&#8217;s sadistic and unnecessary even if you oppose abortion. There&#8217;s a name for those who write and vote for such laws: misogynists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 886/955 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 16:41:29 by W3 Total Cache -->