The Million Muslim March and Its Foreign Islamist Ties

Ryan Mauro is a fellow with the Clarionproject.org, the founder of WorldThreats.com and a frequent national security analyst for Fox News Channel. He can be contacted at ryanmauro1986@gmail.com.


hqdefaultThe 9/11 Truther organizers of the “Million American March Against Fear on 9/11,” formerly known as the “Million Muslim March,” aren’t keen on those who dig up their alliances with foreign Islamist groups like Viva Palestina in the U.K. and Jamaat-e-Islami in Bangladesh. In a recent conference call, one of the organizers even attacked me as a “Nazi bulldog.”

The American Muslim Political Action Committee (AMPAC) leads the “Million American March Against Fear on 9/11.” Its website claims that “’Al-Qaeda is a joke. And so is the whole ‘war on terror’” and “the so-called ‘Islamic terrorist threat’ is pure hallucination.” Formerly known as the “Million Muslim March,” the event’s name was rebranded after 9/11 Truth groups joined it.

AMPAC is based in Missouri and is led by MD Rabbi Alam, who has suggested that Jews were responsible for 9/11. He also leads the Missouri Democratic Party Asian American Caucus and received significant attention when the Missouri Right to Life PAC endorsed his bid to become Secretary of State.

On August 22, the Clarion Project published an expose of how Alam and the leadership of his Missouri Democratic Party Asian American Caucus are linked to the pro-Hamas Viva Palestina group. Viva Palestina is led by anti-American politician George Galloway and is facing a second investigation by the British government for failing to disclose its finances.

“[T]he Viva Palestina campaign is more about supporting and legitimizing Hamas than it is about providing aid to the needy…They treat Hamas leaders as the legitimate representatives of the Palestinian people and provide both material and political support to the terrorist organization,” writes the Investigative Project on Terrorism.

Alam also organized a “Million Muslim March” in his home country of Bangladesh to protest “violence against Islam.” The enemy of Islam he is referring to is Bangladesh’s popularly-elected secular government and the group he is defending is Jamaat-e-Islami, an Islamist group with leaders that are on trial for war crimes.

In February, there were massive demonstrations demanding action against the Islamist Jamaat-e-Islami group that wants to implement Shariah Law. The protests began after a Jamat-e-Islami leader was sentenced to life in prison, eliciting a smile and victory hand signal from the convicted war criminal. The Islamist group has responded with protests of its own; a campaign that Alam is contributing to. The group was recently prohibited from taking part in elections by a Bangladeshi court.

On August 24, two days after the Clarion Project article was posted, the Million American March Against Fear organizers had a conference call that was posted on its website.

“I’m gonna say this, with like, overwhelming concern. There’s this story on a website called the Clarion Project,” says one speaker at about 24 minutes in.

“There’s definitely, without question, when it gets to a level like that, where Ryan Mauro, the guy who wrote that story, he’s another Nazi bulldog, and they are trying to call out, like, the highest order against us here,” he then says.

The march organizers are particularly incensed with devout Muslim Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, whose American Islamic Forum for Democracy condemned the event. Alam’s group responded ferociously, calling him a “house Muslim” that is the “least popular Muslim in America” that is despised by almost every Muslim-American.

Actually, Alam and his group are the unpopular ones. The event’s Facebook page has 130 “likes” and his organization’s Facebook page has 126. Jasser’s group has almost 1,500 “likes,” so the supposed “least popular Muslim in America” has ten times more support than Alam.

Many of the march’s original supporters have run away since it started getting negative attention. A screenshot from August 18 lists the American Muslim Task Force; Hussam Ayloush, director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations chapter in Los Angeles and Imam Mahdi Bray of the Muslim American Society as endorsers. These three groups no longer appear on the website.

One of the objectives of the rally is to unite Muslims and non-Muslims behind the idea that the U.S. government is essentially evil; that the U.S. government would murder 3,000 of its own citizens just to have a pretext to murder and persecute innocent Muslims around the world.

That’s where Dr. Kevin Barrett, the Director of Media and Outreach for the march comes in. He is the founder of the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth. It has a small number of endorsements from writers, theology professors and ministers. It promotes a Day of Prayer for 9/11 Truth and has instructions on how to influence clergy.

The Million American March Against Fear on 9/11 will begin at noon at the National Mall and then move to Congress, the Supreme Court and the White House. At 2 PM, the rally will merge with the March Against Drones. More specific details about the route are available at the website.

There are few things more offensive than a march on 9/11 that’s designed to shift attention away from Al-Qaeda’s victims to “Islamophobia,” so-called American “imperialism” and 9/11 conspiracy theories. The refusal of CAIR, MAS, ISNA and others to rally behind the event shows there are some lines that even the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood knows not to cross.

This article was sponsored by the Institute on Religion and Democracy.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

  • ReyR

    1. “…that the U.S. government is essentially evil” is an indisputable fact, but the Muslims’ cynical plan to co-opt popular discontent and launch an intimidation campaign against the kuffar is something different.
    2. “so-called American “imperialism”. Oh please, this sleight of hands will not do: of course Islam is evil and dangerous, but it doesn’t mean that the American imperialism does not exist. Just ask around (but of course you won’t).
    3. “…9/11 conspiracy theories” at least offer plausible theories on the horror that visited the US 13 years ago, because the official explanation doesn’t hold water.
    Diagnosis: Though apparently well-meaning, the entire piece seams to be build around an abusive analogy in terms of logic.

    • Albury Smith

      There is nothing at all plausible about 9/11 “truth movement” nonsense, and I’ve just asked around as suggested and can’t find any examples of current US imperialism. Please feel free to enlighten me on both counts.

      • ReyR

        None is as blind as those as will not see.

        • Chezwick

          My God!….a ‘Truther’ right here at FPM.

          “Plausible theories”……????

          I’ve read them all….

          Such as….every night over a period of months, TNT was smuggled into the Towers by federal agents (or perhaps the “Illuminati”, each floor being wired with said TNT (ultimately totaling hundreds of thousands if not millions of pounds),…and night after night, no security guards ever noticed anything amiss as this operation went on….morning after morning, nobody who works in the buildings ever noticed anything amiss in their now-heavily-TNT-laden offices?….

          Such as the Pentagon being hit by a missile???…(and nobody knows what happened to the actual airliner)???

          Such as flight 97 unloading its passengers in Cleveland, where they were unceremoniously murdered by federal agents and then their bodies transported to Shanksville???

          A healthy skepticism is one thing, gullibility bordering on childishness is another. Go spew your nonsense to a left-wing web-site where you can share your adolescent theories with the like-minded. We’re adults here!

          • ReyR

            Precisely, Chezwick, adults. I do not believe in laws divine but rather in the laws of physics. If I accept the official explanation, I risk devolving into a medieval retard, like those Saudi morality police who recently brought charges of witchcraft against a woman that could allegedly fly on air. For them, any other explanation is heresy and conspiracy. For me, the woman could not escape from a building’s top story by flying. In their eyes, I am a conspiracy freak, but you know what? I can survive that. As long as the laws of physics stand, I know I’m sane.

          • ReyR

            Precisely, Chezwick, we are adults. Who choose to rely not on the laws divine but rather on the laws of physics. Or else, I risk devolving back to something as medieval as those Saudi sharia judges who condemned a woman as a practicing witch because they could not explain how she had escaped from the top floor of a building. Said they, Isn’t it obvious that Shaitan helped her fly? To them, my doubts would be a sign of heresy and conspiracy. To me, their way of thinking is… to put it mildly, incompetent. As long as the laws of physics stand, I am sure of my sanity. Therefore, even though I do not subscribe specifically to any of the theories you cited above, science tells me that the official version is a lie.

          • Chezwick

            You’re confusing utter contempt with emotionalism.

          • Chezwick

            “The laws of physics”….

            I love that one.

            You see folks, one of the ‘Truther’ sacred cows is that steel only melts at a specific temperature….and the burning towers were not hot enough to melt steel….so it HAD to be a conspiracy.

            They overlook the simple fact that the steel didn’t HAVE to MELT, it only had to weaken sufficiently for the weight of the upper floors to buckle the impact areas. This is why Tower 2 fell long before Tower 1, even though it was hit 15 or 20 minutes LATER…..because the area of impact was much LOWER on Tower 2, and therefore, the weight of the upper floors was much greater.

            So it goes with each and every “un-explainable” aspect of the event that so feeds the hungry imaginations of the conspiracy theorists.

          • Dan Bland

            There was molten metal flowing out of the South Tower for minutes leading up to he collapse.

          • Albury Smith

            Right where the fires were the most severe and where the fuselage of UA 175 wound up, and the South Tower collapsed LATER from the SE, not NE corner.

          • defcon 4

            HUh? How do you know? Do you have any evidence of this?

          • ‘J’ Canaan Greene

            Look it up on youtube.. there’s video of it for all to see if they have the courage to open their eyes.

          • ‘J’ Canaan Greene

            You’re parroting a fallacious argument that you were programmed to regurgitate any time the molten steel issue is raised.

            The whole “steel didn’t have to melt” argument is a STRAWMAN ARGUMENT that does not address the fact that steel DID melt. It’s an attempt to sidestep this issue and avoid dealing with the need to explain HOW DID THIS STEEL MELT, and the fact is that the “official story” offers ZERO explanation for how this could have happened. The molten steel is hard evidence that the official story is a lie, and that thermal weaponry of some form or another was employed and involved in the attacks that had nothing to do with Jet planes, hijackers with box cutters or “jet fuel fires”.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            What temperature is required for steel to melt?

          • defcon 4

            What about the hundreds (thousands) of people who saw two 767′s slam into the WTC, were they all hallucinating?

          • Demetrius Minneapolis

            Amen Chezwick. My question to “truthers” is would it not have been easier to just go hire 20 wild and crazy muslims to hijack four aircraft and just fly them into the buildings? Could work you know.
            Regarding the aircraft AA fl77, which struck the Pentegon, I saw that aircraft with my own eyes seconds before impact. Did not see the actual impact, but saw it close enough while stuck in traffic to see the rivet lines holding the panels together. Missile? My G-d these people are stupid.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Those people aren’t stupid.

            They are EVIL.

          • ‘J’ Canaan Greene

            Easier?? Do yourself and all of America a favor and look up pilots for 9/11 truth.. Veteran professional pilots from the military and the private sector attest to the fact that the maneuvers that were pulled off that day would be virtually impossible for them to pull off.. Meanwhile, according to their own instructors, the “19 hijackers” were reportedly AWFUL pilots.

            After soaking that in, then do yourself and all of America another favor and look up “Core Of Corruption” on youtube and watch it.. The reality is that those 19 hijackers were also recruited, imported, protected and practically walked onto the plane by individuals high up within the U.S. intelligence services and political system.

          • Headed4TheHills

            Y’all got hard evidence o’ this, J, or is it more smoke an’ mirrors?

            HEADED, STOP!!! Yer feedin’ trolls again, son.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            Ahh, but without the “illicit steel melting” we would not have had completely collapsed buildings, which was the fundamental argument for the Patriot Act. Since the buildings collapsed we were able to justify all of the new “neo colonial” policies.

            Doncha get it? It was a super-secret global conspiracy AND part of it is that they duped OBL in to playing the fall guy. And only the ultra-wise truthers can understand the complex physics and politics. Plus everyone knows Islam is a religion of peace. And they don’t have the resources to figure out how to attack us. OBL had no access to architects or engineers. Come on, those guys are from the 7th century. They haven’t evolved yet.

            You guys just don’t get it! Bush did it!

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Chezwick AKBAR!

            mohammed Eternal NAKBA!

          • Guest

            You perspective is one of skepticism.. yet your skepticism is a matter of belief. The facts are the facts. The facts are that hard evidence was uncovered by the USGS proving that temperatures were reached in the WTC fires that were at least close to 4750ºF.. i.e. they found hard evidence that MOLYBDENUM was refined out of its original steel alloy, the other elements were all vaporized and burned off, and the molybdenum itself melted into a sphere and then, upon cooling, hardened into this shape permanently.

            This is rock solid “DNA” proof that cannot possibly be explained by the official story, thereby proving the official story false. This hard evidence proves that a thermochemical reaction or some form of thermal weaponry had to have been employed in the towers that had nothing to do with the jet planes or “jet fuel fires”.

            It’s also a fact that the USGS censored their 9/11 report and tried to keep the public from finding out about their discovery of this hard evidence/molten molybdenum.. thereby proving an official cover-up at the federal level! The only reason we know about the molten molybdenum that was discovered was because the USGS was sued under the FOIA, lost their case, and were forced to release the information that they had tried to conceal.

            So you can BELIEVE what you want to BELIEVE about it being “impossible” because you can’t personally conceive of how they pulled it off.. but the hard evidence, and the facts prove that your beliefs are irrelevant and false. Your beliefs aside, the REALITY is that somehow they DID pull it off and “they” was NOT “19 hijackers with box cutters”. So what do you say you break free from your cognitive dissonance and wake up to the truth.. You’ve already had over a decade to see through the fairytale that is the “official story”.. What’s taking you so long!??

          • Albury Smith

            Not being in your 9/11 “truth movement,” I don’t know of any incendiary or explosive that keeps metal molten for months, but the maximum debris fire temperatures recorded at the WTC site by the USGS flyovers using AVIRIS infrared heat sensing equipment 5 and 12 days after 9/11 were under 1400º F, i.e. nowhere near “4750ºF.”

          • ‘J’ Canaan Greene

            Your perspective is one of skepticism.. yet your skepticism is a matter of belief. The facts are the facts. The facts are that hard evidence was uncovered by the USGS proving that temperatures were reached in the WTC fires that were at least close to 4750ºF.. i.e. they found hard evidence that MOLYBDENUM was refined out of its original steel alloy, the other elements were all
            vaporized and burned off, and the molybdenum itself melted into a sphere and then, upon cooling, hardened into this shape permanently.

            This is rock solid “DNA” proof that cannot possibly be explained by the official story, thereby proving the official story false. This hard evidence proves, beyond a reasonable doubt, that a thermochemical reaction or some form of thermal weaponry had to have been employed in the towers that had nothing to do with the jet planes or “jet fuel fires”.

            It’s also a fact that the USGS censored their 9/11 report and tried to keep the public from finding out about their discovery of this hard evidence/molten molybdenum.. thereby proving an official cover-up at the federal level! The only reason we know about the molten molybdenum
            that was discovered was because the USGS was sued under the FOIA, lost their case, and were forced to release the information that they had tried to conceal.

            So you can BELIEVE what you want to BELIEVE about it being “impossible” because you can’t personally conceive of how they pulled it off.. but the hard evidence, and the facts prove that your beliefs are
            irrelevant and false. Your beliefs aside, the REALITY is that somehow they DID pull it off and “they” was NOT “19 hijackers with box cutters”. So what do you say you break free from your cognitive dissonance and wake up to the truth.. You’ve already had over a decade to see through the fairytale that is the “official story”.. What’s taking you so long!??

        • Albury Smith

          One of us apparently “will not see” that 9/11 was an(other) al Qaeda suicide attack on the US, preceded by 2 declarations of war (fatwas), reiterations of those sentiments by Osama bin Laden in interviews with Arnett & Bergen in 1997 and with John Miller in 1998, and the suicide bombing of US embassies in Nairobi & Dar es Salaam followed by the suicide bombing of the USS Cole.
          Since you’re also foolish enough to believe in physical impossibilities, please urge Box Boy* and his “experts” to show you on video with audio how
          explosives or incendiaries secretly cut the 4.91″ flanges, 3.07″ webs, and 215
          sq in cross sections of W14 X 730 columns like the 11 of 24 in WTC 7′s core, and
          the 4 corner columns in each tower’s
          core:
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c2o8k4n9CY
          If they ever HAD TO do
          it, this “debate” would be OVER.
          *Box Boy’s ONLY 9/11
          “research”:
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFVoencqfZw

          • Headed4TheHills

            Albury, yer feedin’ the trolls again. Ya ain’t gonna change their minds, no matter how logical and reasoned your arguments.

          • ‘J’ Canaan Greene

            People who believe the official story always feel the need to rely upon name calling and insults to “prove” their perspective.. that’s cognitive dissonance at work.. you can’t accept facts that upset and even overturn your world view, and so, in order to ignore the facts, you shut them out by insulting and ridiculing those that CAN accept the facts, and by praising a bonding with people who are suffering from your own state of cognitive dissonance.

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jq_O9K1L51A

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “People who believe the official story always feel the need to rely upon name calling and insults to “prove” their perspective.. that’s cognitive dissonance at work.. ”

            I’m not saying I accept the “official story” as complete or even accurate, but your theories are stupid.

          • Headed4TheHills

            Ah, J, yer breakin’ me heart, sayin’ I am sufferin’ cognitive dissonance.

            Now, if’n ya called me nuts, crazy, wacky, etc. I might jus’ have agreed with ya an’ let it go at that. I have frequently stipulated to bein’ a bit ’round the bend.

            However, I feel a certain umbrage at someone claimin’ I have cognitive dissonance.

            1) In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog), either accidentally or with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. In this case, starting an argument, so ol’ HT4H calls ‘em as he sees ‘em..

            2) I don’t believe the “truthers”. What I do believe is sound scientific thinkin’ an’ proof. Which I have seen in abundance for what actually happened versus what the “truthers” say happened. Still waintin’ on them there photographs showin’ the sneaky suckas haulin’ in enough dynomite / nitro / C4 / what have ya to bring down those towers. An’ don’t tell me they don’t exist. As much video surveillance as we have, ya jus’ cain’t convince me that all the cameras around two such landmarks all went fuzzy at jus’ the right times.

            3) My worldview bein’ overturned botherin’ me? Pshah, ol’ bean. Take more’n someone provin’ me wrong to upset me. My wife does it, an’ we dun been married 19 years. But you jus’ watch a “truther” get questioned about their “facts”, woo-boy, y’all gone see someone who has problems with their worldview bein’ doubted.

            4) Claimin’ a bond with Albury? Shee-oot, how can I do that? I don’t know Albury, what he / she may or may not believe. But what I did see an’ claim was ol’ Albury a feedin’ a troll (kinda like what I’m a doin’ with you). An’ I remembered two o’ my top rules – 1) Don’t feed the trolls, an’ 2) DON’T FEED THE TROLLS.

            Y’all have a nice day now, ya hear?

          • Mlm46

            How come you make more sense than this wild theory being put forth? Thanks for the good laugh!

          • Headed4TheHills

            Aw shucks, tweren’t nuthin

          • Mlm46

            It works both ways! What makes you think that your “facts” are the only right answer? Videos can be doctored, so that is a waste of time. There may never be a satisfactory answer for all, but crazy theories must be proven where they cannot be denied.

          • ‘J’ Canaan Greene

            Perhaps you missed the memo.. but propaganda aside, the reality is that the FBI, while listing Bin Laden as being wanted for the embassy bombings you mentioned, never indicted or even listed Bin Laden as being WANTED for 9/11. When questioned as to why he was not wanted for 9/11, they very bluntly responded by saying that he wasn’t wanted for 9/11 because they didn’t have any hard evidence that he was tied to the attacks, and so there was no justification for him being indicted for them.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            It was an act of war, not a mere criminal act. Criminal investigations take longer and have a higher standard for evidence gathering in order to protect the rights of citizens and legal visitors.

          • Albury Smith

            That’s an outright lie:
            http://www.fbi.gov/news/testimony/the-terrorist-threat-confronting-the-united-states
            The FBI, CIA, and other intelligence agencies had irrefutable proof that 9/11 was an(other) al Qaeda suicide attack on the US. Bin Laden was already on the Most Wanted List for the suicide bombings of US embassies in Nairobi & Dar es Salaam, and there was nothing to be gained by adding 9/11 to the charges. A formal indictment just to add the 9/11 charge would’ve required the unnecessary disclosure of intelligence info and sources and been totally meaningless, since he could still only have been captured or killed once.
            How many denials of their Planes Operation have you heard from al Qaeda in the last decade+?

        • SCREW SOCIALISM

          RayR, I see the evil called the Red/Green fascist alliance.

          Socialists/Nazitional Socialists/Islamofascists in a group hug.

          • hrwolfe

            Don’t you know? Green is the new Red!

        • defcon 4

          None is so stupid as those who won’t think.

    • myrna652

      what Nicole replied I am dazzled that a stay at home mom can earn $7611 in four weeks on the internet. this article w­w­w.K­E­P­2.c­o­m

  • ReyR

    Bypassing my 2 points and going straight to destroy my 3d point is amateurish, sergeant. The oldest trick in the book, trite and trivial. Doesn’t work on a Russian guy. Thus you agree that my points 1 and 2 stand.
    As to No. 3, your “logic” would pass as solid for a community college graduate, but any firefighter can tell us that if you pour a gallon of gasoline on top of a cubic foot of reinforced concrete it cannot collapse in an hour, so forget about pulverizing a huge building in 56 minutes. Of course, a human body like that of Thomas James Ball would burn out pretty soon, but certainly not a gazillion cubic meters of concrete. But then, Thomas James Ball too is just another conspiracy theory in your universe. At least he is not there in the Wikipedia.
    And – speaking of utter contempt – the way you see the world is truly amazing to me.

    • Chezwick

      I don’t know who “sergeant” is….but for the record Sherlock, I’m not the writer of this article….(you can’t seem to get anything right).

      Still, I’ll take a crack at it…..

      1. “…that the U.S. government is essentially evil” is an indisputable fact

      Since when is an opinion an “indisputable fact”. There are aspects of the US government that are evil….and there are aspects that aren’t.

      2. US imperialism…

      A case could readily be made that the US is an “imperialist” nation. A case could also be made that our projections abroad are not for the purposes of exploitation (there is a net outflow of total value in our relations with client regimes), and therefore, we are NOT imperialist. I think the truth is somewhere in the middle.

      3. Because of the damage done to the impact areas and the subsequent stress of holding up the upper floors, the kinetic energy released by the buckling was more than enough bring down the towers.

      • defcon 4

        I like point three, because I’m certain the weight of concrete and steel (and humans) above the area where the 767′s hit and exploded must have been many tons.

      • ReyR

        Sergeant was a joke. We Russians are known to have a sick sense of humor, so I have a reputation to keep up.
        And of course I know you did not author this piece, but weren’t you the one who slammed me with “utter contempt”?
        1. “…that the U.S. government is essentially evil” is a fact proven beyond all doubt by contents of FPM. Right now, as I see it, your government is at least as bad as the Soviet geriatric cronies on the verge of our infamous collapse. Perhaps worse: our idiots at least never installed a sharia puppet on top.
        2. US imperialism. Lots of material on the issue, and probably Chalmers Johnson’s Blowback would do for starters, even if rather obsolete. But then again, you can take a practical path and ask directly people in Japan, the Philippines, Chile, Nicaragua, Vietnam, Congo, and many other nations: Is the US an empire? Take Japanese as your starting point, and alleged allies. You may be surprised. Just as I was surprised when I heard the answer about my own nation 30 years ago.
        3. Lots of credible contributions by competent architects and engineers available on line. Who am I to tell you what you should know? No one denies that the 9/11 suicide attacks took place, but they were only part of the equation. Each tower had a footprint of about an acre and stood 110 stories tall. The North Tower was struck between the 93rd and 99th floors, the South Tower between the 77th and 85th floors. The weight of 25 and 30 floors going down respectively would be surely enough to collapse the buildings to ruins, but never to pulverize them entirely from top to bottom. In my own experience, years ago I saw the ruins of a 14-story building hit by a fighter plane at 8th floor. It was just that: a ruin, not dust and powder. I have also seen controlled demolition. It looked very much like the Twin Towers going down. Should I believe my eyes and mind, or some government fibs? When you call me gullible it just makes me smile at my 54. You see, we here tend to question most of what our big bro tells us. Kinda national character, this, after all those years. Our American cousins seem to be of a different persuasion.

        • SCREW SOCIALISM

          ReyR

          “Sergeant was a joke”.

          All your posts are a joke.

          I predict you will be demoted by KGB Putin for doing such a laughably poor job.

          Next stop for you is Siberia.

          • ReyR

            Hey, I live far enough to the east of Moscow, Siberia scares me none. But you seem to eke out a miserable and craven living. An immigrant’s life is tough, particularly when one’s a turncoat and the host nation is crumbling. Getting pretty difficult to screw socialism in Husein’s America, ain’t it, compatriot?

        • Chezwick

          You’re very deep Ivan.

    • Albury Smith

      You still haven’t provided any examples of current US imperialism, and since you continue to express your confusion over the al Qaeda suicide attacks of 9/11, the following probably won’t register with you:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68fExbnok4o
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GW8_Zbsirdw
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiKyWJRRjnU
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qloshSGAJ1s
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHe7Q2oWLB0
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6obQ5naNn0
      From OBL’s 1998 (second) fatwa: “The ruling to kill the Americans
      and their allies-civilians and military-is an individual duty for every Muslim
      who can do it in any country in which it is possible to do it, in order to
      liberate the al-Aqsa Mosque and the holy mosque [Mecca] from their grip, and in
      order for their armies to move out of all the lands of Islam, defeated and
      unable to threaten any Muslim. This is in accordance with the words of Almighty
      God, “and fight the pagans all together as they fight you all together,” and
      “fight them until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail
      justice and faith in God [blah, blah, blah...]“

      • Dan Bland

        Shake your head. I’m afraid there’s nothing inside your skull.

        • Albury Smith

          I’m not the topic here.

    • SCREW SOCIALISM

      RayR,

      If your childish pap is true, then you should expect the FBI/NSA/CIA/Mossad/Mi6/KGB to take you out.

      You “spilled the beans”.

      Will you call yourself Chelsea too?

  • SCREW SOCIALISM

    Morte Pal-e-SWINE-a.

    INSHALLAH!

  • SCREW SOCIALISM

    May the “prophet” of satan, muhammed, BURN i H E L L for eternity!

    INSHALLAH!

    • kishwar mahmud

      ” O God, You are my Lord, none has the right to be worshipped except you, You created me and I am Your servant and I abide to your covenant and promise as best I can, I take refuge in You from the evil of which I comitted. I acknowledge my sin, so forgive me, for verily none can forgive sin except You.” ( Prophet Muhammad, Peace be upon him.)

      • defcon 4

        Ishaq:441
        “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. “O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.”‘”

  • hrwolfe

    Odd all the comments seem to be fixated on the 9/11 truther aspect and nothing about the Million Muslim March. I would like to let you all know that the 2 Million Bikers to DC is forming up in all Continental 48 and are heading to DC to Honor those that were murdered on that day and those that have Fallen or are Wounded in the resulting defense of America. And if they happen to surround a million Muslims with 2 million Hogs, so be it. Give them you prayers, they ride for you!

    • ReyR

      Exactly. I started this thread with three points, only to have a bunch of paid trolls and some well-meaning patriots on my back about 9/11. But my point from the start was that Islamists are trying to hijack the initiative and co-opt the MMM in the most cynical and threatening way.
      The Bikers’ March is a good response!

      • hrwolfe

        The organizers of the MMM have played havoc with the Facebook page and the efforts to organize the 2MBtoDC but it is growing, growing and will soon be gone, to DC, if only I could afford to go, any sponsors out there?

        • ReyR

          Hey man, I’d even like to go myself, but I’m in Russia. Anyhow, even if one can’t go, spread the word. In this case at least, knowledge is power. Islam must be stopped – all over the world!

  • hrwolfe

    2 Million Bikers to DC is on Facebook at that name, show some support.

  • garyfouse

    As for Galloway, I’ll make it a point to contact that agency investigating him in UK and offer myself as a witness to his Hamas fundraiser at UC Irvine in 2009. Maybe I’ll get a free trip to London out of it.

    On second thought….

  • The Harbinger

    It is time to wake up an look around if you do not already see that Islam is a threat to the non-Muslim world.

  • Jakareh

    I want to know who let Rabbi Alam into the country.

  • Dan Bland

    I’m a 62 yr old veteran. I also call myself a Truther because I know without any doubt whatsoever that we don’t know the full Truth about the events of 9/11. We will get a real investigation because we love our country and we don’t like it being destroyed. The only way Building 7 could have been destroyed like that was by controlled demolition and you can say the same about the towers. I’m here for one reason and that’s to beg any reader of this comment to do some research on your own. Please go look at the collapse of Building 7. Thank you.

    • Albury Smith

      I beg you to urge Box Boy* and his “experts” to demonstrate on video with audio how explosives or incendiaries secretly cut the 4.91″ flanges, 3.07″ webs, and 215 sq in cross sections of W14 X 730 columns like the 11 of 24 in WTC 7′s core, and the 4 corner columns in each tower’s
      core:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c2o8k4n9CY
      If they ever HAD TO do it, this “debate” would be OVER.
      *Box Boy’s ONLY 9/11 “research”:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFVoencqfZw

      • Dan Bland

        Building 7 fell all at once from the base then fell at free fall acceleration for one third of its collapse. Impossible without some help. As for the towers, the official report explains their destruction by saying the upper blocks crushed and completely destroyed the blocks underneath. In the case of the North Tower, that 15 floors crushing 95 in 11 seconds. Again impossible without some help. In the case of the South Tower, the upper block leaned, so leaning means momentum over where there is no resistance. So this completely undermines the official reports explanation. If it leaned, how could it have crushed the lower block? These are just 3 of the numerous anomalies. Everywhere you look you find problems with the official report which was written by a Bush insider.

        • defcon 4

          “Impossible” eh? Ever heard of Occam’s Razor?

          • ‘J’ Canaan Greene

            Occam’s razor would state that since the building fell vertically and at a speed only possible based upon the vertical supports being removed via controlled demolition, controlled demolition must have been the means by which the building collapsed. That’s the simplest and most logical possible explanation.

          • defcon 4

            Duh, so what’s your rationale for why the 767′s hit the WTC? Why not just blow up the WTC and call it islamic terorrism? After all, there was ALREADY a bombing of the WTC in the early 1990′s. Or maybe you believe that was a mossad/CIA covert op as well?

          • Dan Bland

            Can you think independently of outside influence at all. I seriously oust it.

          • AlreadyDead

            Can you think at all?

          • Dan Bland

            “Already brain dead” is a better name for ya.

          • defcon 4

            Why am I not surprised you don’t have an answer for my question? Why don’t you blame the Jews/zionists or the CIA for 9-11? Come on, don’t be coy.

          • Dan Bland

            I don’t think airliners hit the WTC but there’s really no need in going into that. Whatever hit the towers did not cause the collapse initiation because both towers remained standing after the crashes. So the official report says the fires got hot enough to weaken those massive core columns, funny. Firemen had already reached the impact zone and reported what they saw and how to go about fighting what they saw. It wasn’t even hot enough to weaken those firefighters. There’s no need for you to argue here. There’s no way you’re going to win an argument here. The people of this country are going to overthrow the people who committed the crimes of 9/11.
            Bet on it.

        • Albury Smith

          Your precious ~2.25 seconds at g was only the EXTERIOR of WTC 7 collapsing; the interior collapse had been underway for ~10 seconds at that point. Not that it matters much, but g could theoretically have been exceeded for part of that time, since interior beams already in motion were connected to the exterior W14 X 500 columns.
          Instead of foolishly trying to divine the causes of building collapses by their acceleration, let’s see some real evidence of C/D. As I previously suggested, simply ask Box Boy* and his “experts” to show you on video with audio how explosives or incendiaries secretly cut the 4.91″ flanges, 3.07″ webs, and 215 sq in cross sections of W14 X 730 columns like the 11 of 24 in WTC 7′s core, and the 4 corner columns in each tower’s core:
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c2o8k4n9CY
          If they ever HAD TO do it, this “debate” would be OVER.
          *Box Boy’s ONLY 9/11
          “research”:
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFVoencqfZw

          • Dan Bland

            That’s how the experts do it. The interior falls first then h exterior. It’s called an implosion.

          • Albury Smith

            The interior fell first so therefore it was a C/D? No wonder no one takes your 9/11 “truth movement” seriously.
            http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/911NutPhysics.HTM
            Once again, let’s see how W14 X 730 columns are secretly cut with explosives. We’ve already seen what happens when some nitwit drops cardboard boxes on each other.

        • Albury Smith

          Since you’ve apparently never watched a tower collapse video, here’s what the 236 perimeter columns looked like in section:
          http://www.caddigest.com/subjects/wtc/select/clifton/images/image008.gif
          Where on them were your imaginary explosives planted, pray tell?

    • ObamaYoMoma

      So do you also believe that America’s foreign policy also creates terrorists? Since if you do, then you are more than a little unhinged, as the so-called 9/11 terrorist attacks weren’t terrorist attacks at all. Instead, they were jihad attacks, as jihad, in stark contrast to terrorism, is holy fighting in the cause of Allah for the establishment/expansion of Islam via the imposition of Sharia, which is Islamic totalitarian law. Indeed, Islam is not a so-called “religion of peace” as the sole fundamental purpose of Islam, per the infamous sword verses of the Koran and the doctrine of abrogation, is the subjugation of all religions and all infidels into Islamic totalitarianism through jihad and the imposition of Sharia, which once again is Islamic totalitarian law.

  • Biff Henderson

    Mahdi Bray and the rest of that lot bailing on the Umma? Next he’ll be withdrawing his endorsement for the the Official Vodka of the Muslim American Society.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    aren’t keen on those who dig up their alliances with foreign Islamist groups like Viva Palestina in the U.K. and Jamaat-e-Islami in Bangladesh.

    This moonbat posing as a writer continues to give us fairy tales every time he writes about Islam. To him Islam is a so-called “religion of peace” that is being hijacked by Islamists, i.e., radical Muslims. However, in reality the only Islamists that exist exist in the minds of moonbats like him, i.e., loons that have been blinded by political correctness.

    Let me rain on his gullible useful idiot parade again, as Islam is not a so-called “religion of peace”, which is exceedingly obvious to anyone halfway paying attention. I mean can anyone point to just one Islamic country in the world that isn’t totalitarian as hell? How about pointing to just one Islamic totalitarian hellhole that doesn’t harshly oppress and slaughter on occasion the non-Muslim infidels that unfortunately aren’t fortunate enough not to live in an Islamic country. Hell, point to just one that provides females equality with males. Very apparently, he must wear political correct blinders on his eyes that prevent him from seeing the obvious reality that also radically conflicts with the currently accepted very false narrative.

    Well here’s a little dose of reality for this moonbat, the sole fundamental purpose of Islam, per the infamous sword verses of the Koran and the universally accepted doctrine of abrogation, is the subjugation of all religions and all infidels into Islamic totalitarianism via the imposition of Sharia, which is Islamic totalitarian law.

    Furthermore, the re-creation of the Caliphate in which neo-con moonbats cite ad nauseum doesn’t have anything whatsoever to do with why Muslims attack non-Muslim infidels. Muslims are obligated to make Islam supreme throughout the world via jihad and the eventual imposition of Sharia, because all Muslims are taught that their holy book, in stark contrast to all other religion’s holy books, contains the direct verbatim testimony of Allah, i.e., God, as dictated to Muhammad by the archangel Gabriel. Thus, Islam’s holy book, i.e., the Koran, must be taken only in its most literal sense and can’t ever be questioned, since to question it would be to question God. Hence, the infamous sword verses of the Koran, which abrogate and replace all the earlier issued peaceful verses of the Koran in which they conflict with, must be taken only in its most literal sense.

    Everyone remember Sharia? Sharia or Islamic totalitarian law is what the GWB State Department enshrined the constitutions of Iraq and Afghanistan with, making Sharia the highest law in each respective country, and also ensuring at the same time that both Muslim countries would inevitably become Islamic totalitarian hellholes as, indeed, they did. As a matter of fact, the only freedom that Sharia allows is the freedom for Muslims to become more devout slaves of Allah. Is that what our troops were dying for? Apparently!

    Nevertheless, I bet this moonbat posing as a writer still believes that the Iraq war was somehow a miraculous victory and that Afghanistan would have been a victory as well if not for the election of Barack Hussein Obama who then snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. Now, please people, don’t falsely accuse me of being an Obama supporter again, as he is even more mentally deficient that GWB, but not by much.

    Also, when this moonbat posing as a writer uses the politically correct label Islamists to describe Muslims that he stupidly believes are radicals, at the same time he also implies the existence of so-called “moderate Muslims”. However, the existence of so-called “moderate Muslims” are not only a politically correct myth, they are also impossible to even exist: Indeed, the first and foremost prerequisite of Islam is the total, complete, and unconditional submission to the “will of Allah” under the pain of death for blasphemy and apostasy, and the “will of Allah” in essence is Sharia, or Islamic totalitarian law. Thus, for a person of Islamic persuasion to be considered a so-called “moderate” in the true Western sense of the word, that person would necessarily have to consciously disavow Sharia, which simultaneously would make that person a blasphemous apostate and also earn them a death sentence at the same time. Moreover, such a person would not automatically become a so-called “moderate Muslim” at that time, as they would cease being a Muslim altogether the instant they consciously disavowed Sharia. Indeed, they would in effect become ex-Muslims and apostates at that time.

    In any event, jihad is not only the highest pillar of which Islam stands; it is also a fundamental holy obligation incumbent upon ALL MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX MUSLIMS in one form or another. Thus, ALL MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX MUSLIMS in the world are jihadists in one form or another. Otherwise, they are blasphemous apostates that must be executed according to the texts and tenets of Islam. Hence, since all Muslims are jihadists in one form or another, how can some be moderates, while others are radicals? The reality is they can’t, which is why this moonbat posing as a writer is so ridiculous!

    Moreover, since all MAINSTEAM ORTHODOX MUSLIMS in the world are jihadists in one form or another, that means the millions of Muslims also living over here in the good ole USA are jihadists in one form or another as well. Thus, mass Muslim immigration, along with all of its excess baggage, must be banned and reversed ASAP.

    Indeed, had GWB not been so mentally incompetent in 2001, he would have exercised common sense and banned and reversed mass Muslim immigration immediately in response to 9/11, instead of exponentially expanding the size, scope, and power of the federal government like a Dhimmicrat on steroids allegedly to protect the homeland from the threat of terrorism, which, by the way, isn’t even an Islamic manifestation.

  • UCSPanther

    9/11 truthers: One of the most embarrassingly pathetic fringe movements out there…

    • Dan Bland

      Yea and you’re an asshole

      • Dan Bland

        A brainless asshole.

        • UCSPanther

          What? Aren’t you going to accuse me of working for “The Man”?

          You are slipping…

      • UCSPanther

        Too bad, truther. If all you can manage is an immature insult, you have lost a long time ago…

        • Dan Bland

          All I was doing was following your lead, I think you started out with “pathetic fringe movement”.

          • UCSPanther

            The truth hurts. Now run along.,.

      • Albury Smith

        Here’s what an asshole looks like:
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFVoencqfZw

      • jack johnson

        I just saw that you said you have been studying conspiracy theories for 3+ years. At what point in your sad life did you decide to make this turn? Conspiracy theories have been shot down by numerous left and right political scientists, academics, and experts. Yet somehow “Dan Bland” is going to show the world, right? I bet you have big dreams of becoming famous and shaming the US and their allies. Everyday on your way to Burger King you go over in your head how people will deem you amazing, right?

        Every now and then I go to bed and think to myself “wow, Americans are really dumb, but they can’t get any dumber. They can’t really be any more pathetic.” Then low and behold I come across Dan Bland ……

    • http://www.twf.org Enver Masud

      Fringe movements? Take a look at http://www.twf.org/News/Y2011/0911-Muslims.html

  • starsandstripesforever

    how dare the musys try and make all attention on them again. 9/11 is respectfully in rememberance of 3000 victims of crazed extremest. its about fellow americans firemen and policemen all rescue workers victims familys. Musys shut the he$$ up already. you dont like it here LEAVE.

  • defcon 4

    I’d have to say that just because a journalist doesn’t refer to islam, say, as a totalitarian, supremacist death cult, doesn’t therefore imply they believe islam is a religion of peace.

    • ObamaYoMoma

      I’d have to say that just because a journalist doesn’t refer to islam, say, as a totalitarian, supremacist death cult, doesn’t therefore imply they believe islam is a religion of peace

      That’s not what I said or implied. I said he religiously adheres to his neo-con fantasy based narrative through the collective of all of his writings put together. Read his writings in totality and that’s the only conclusion one can come to. When you use such idiotic terms such as radical and Islamist to describe mainstream orthodox Muslims, it implies that he also believes most Muslims are moderates that practice a so-called benign “religion of peace.” Otherwise, how could they be moderates?

      He never ever attacks the so-called “religion of peace” as the source of the problem. Instead, like a neo-con he always attacks the radicals, i.e., the Islamists, and the hydra-headed terrorists, even though terrorism isn’t even an Islamic manifestation.

      He also always further ignores mass Muslim immigration to the West, which in reality is stealth and deceptive non-violent jihad for the nefarious purpose of demographic conquest.

      Indeed, he claims ad nauseum that the so-called radicals, i.e., Islamists, whose existence is a complete and utter myth, are perpetrating terrorism to kick us out of the Islamic world so they can create a new Muslim Caliphate, which is ludicrous.

      Nevertheless, his prevailing neo-con narrative fits in nicely with his neo-con view of the world and also jives nicely with the self-hating Leftists view of the world that believe that America’s greedy foreign policy creates terrorism and also with the moronic worldview of Ron Paul anarcho-kooks, who idiotically blame America’s “interventionist” foreign policy for creating the “blowback”, i.e., terrorism.

      However, Muslims aren’t terrorists fighting us in response to what we do or even to create a new Caliphate. Instead, they are jihadists fighting in the cause of Allah for the establishment/expansion of Islam, because the sole fundamental purpose of Islam, according to the infamous sword verses of the Koran and the universally accepted in Islam doctrine of abrogation, is the subjugation of all religions and all infidels into Islamic totalitarianism through jihad and the eventual imposition of Sharia, which is Islamic totalitarian law.

      Indeed, Islam, in stark contrast to all true religions of the world, alone alleges that its texts and tenets, including its very draconian totalitarian laws, are divine since they emanate directly from Allah, i.e., God. Thus, it is the one true religion and must be made supreme above all other religions throughout the world via the subjugation of all other religions to include all infidels as well.

  • http://www.twf.org Enver Masud

    My talk at Million American March on 9/11 —
    http://www.twf.org/News/Y2013/0911-EMspeech.html

  • http://www.twf.org Enver Masud

    A Boy Makes Anti-Muslim Comments In Front Of An American Soldier. The Soldiers Reply: Priceless — http://www.upworthy.com/a-boy-makes-anti-muslim-comments-in-front-of-an-american-soldier-the-soldiers-reply-priceless?g=2