<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Underneath the Deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/shoshana-bryen/underneath-the-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/shoshana-bryen/underneath-the-deal/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=underneath-the-deal</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 04:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/shoshana-bryen/underneath-the-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-5319473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2013 01:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211696#comment-5319473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;It&#039;s not correct. Iran has been reaching out to the west for years.&quot;



Yes they have. With death threats and stealth terror campaigns. Lovely outreach programs.


I find it impossible that such a regime would use deception during diplomacy and particularly during arms negotiations with the world&#039;s only superpower that they identify as Big Satan. Who could suggest such a thing? Only imperialists!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s not correct. Iran has been reaching out to the west for years.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes they have. With death threats and stealth terror campaigns. Lovely outreach programs.</p>
<p>I find it impossible that such a regime would use deception during diplomacy and particularly during arms negotiations with the world&#8217;s only superpower that they identify as Big Satan. Who could suggest such a thing? Only imperialists!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/shoshana-bryen/underneath-the-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-5319443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2013 00:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211696#comment-5319443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Are your parents brother and sister? I said the propaganda and lies surrounding Iran are the same lies used about China in the 70&#039;s.&quot;

You need to make your own case then. I won&#039;t try to help you with your flawed theories.

&quot;The only way Iran is gonna have Nuclear weapons is if Israel drops THEIR nuclear weapons on Iranian soil.&quot;



You should have informed us about that a decade ago. I&#039;m sure you tried. Ed smith understands the world better than any American nationalists, that&#039;s for sure.


Ed smith for Secretary of State. But then again we already have John Kerry so I guess you&#039;re a pretty happy camper. He hates American hegemony as much as you do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Are your parents brother and sister? I said the propaganda and lies surrounding Iran are the same lies used about China in the 70&#8242;s.&#8221;</p>
<p>You need to make your own case then. I won&#8217;t try to help you with your flawed theories.</p>
<p>&#8220;The only way Iran is gonna have Nuclear weapons is if Israel drops THEIR nuclear weapons on Iranian soil.&#8221;</p>
<p>You should have informed us about that a decade ago. I&#8217;m sure you tried. Ed smith understands the world better than any American nationalists, that&#8217;s for sure.</p>
<p>Ed smith for Secretary of State. But then again we already have John Kerry so I guess you&#8217;re a pretty happy camper. He hates American hegemony as much as you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/shoshana-bryen/underneath-the-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-5319440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2013 00:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211696#comment-5319440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I don&#039;t see Iran occupying any other country.&quot;


That&#039;s not the biggest risk, I&#039;ll agree. What is your point? &quot;occupation&quot; is the only &quot;evil&quot; in the world? And it&#039;s &quot;never&quot; justified?


&quot;Saudi Arabia invaded Bahrain with tanks.&quot;


I don&#039;t want them to have nukes either. Iran is still more dangerous.


&quot;America invaded Iraq and occupied it.&quot;


For the oil and the capitalism.


&quot;America invaded Afghanistan.&quot;


For the hot chicks and ethnic foods. And drugs.




&quot;Not Iran.&quot;


Iran must be the good guys. Huh. I never noticed before.




&quot;Iran hasn&#039;t invaded a country in over 200 years.&quot;




That&#039;s a statement that might lead one to conclude that your knowledge of history is very weak.




&quot;The only hegemony your talking about is Americas.&quot;



That&#039;s right. I believe in promoting American hegemony if the alternative is to have hostile actors empowered and working against us. Which is essentially why we spend the resources defending it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t see Iran occupying any other country.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not the biggest risk, I&#8217;ll agree. What is your point? &#8220;occupation&#8221; is the only &#8220;evil&#8221; in the world? And it&#8217;s &#8220;never&#8221; justified?</p>
<p>&#8220;Saudi Arabia invaded Bahrain with tanks.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want them to have nukes either. Iran is still more dangerous.</p>
<p>&#8220;America invaded Iraq and occupied it.&#8221;</p>
<p>For the oil and the capitalism.</p>
<p>&#8220;America invaded Afghanistan.&#8221;</p>
<p>For the hot chicks and ethnic foods. And drugs.</p>
<p>&#8220;Not Iran.&#8221;</p>
<p>Iran must be the good guys. Huh. I never noticed before.</p>
<p>&#8220;Iran hasn&#8217;t invaded a country in over 200 years.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a statement that might lead one to conclude that your knowledge of history is very weak.</p>
<p>&#8220;The only hegemony your talking about is Americas.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s right. I believe in promoting American hegemony if the alternative is to have hostile actors empowered and working against us. Which is essentially why we spend the resources defending it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/shoshana-bryen/underneath-the-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-5319433</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2013 00:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211696#comment-5319433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Bush was coming off of his &quot;mission accomplished&quot; in Iraq. He was not interested in talking with the Iranians. He was foolish for that.&quot;



Bush didn&#039;t have his crystal ball functioning too well at the time. And even looking back it&#039;s not clear at all what &quot;talk&quot; would have accomplished. You have an extremely myopic and shallow view of international politics.


I agree that he should have been more active, I&#039;ll put it to you that way. Iran was and remains a bigger threat than Iraq, but Iraq was an easier sell. Iran has been the biggest nonnuclear threat in the world since 1979. Things can only get worse in that respect.


But you know, most of the people in the world are peaceful, yada yada, so I&#039;m sure some insane Shia lunatic won&#039;t actually carry out any of those threats they&#039;ve been articulating for over 3 decades. No problem because most people are peaceful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Bush was coming off of his &#8220;mission accomplished&#8221; in Iraq. He was not interested in talking with the Iranians. He was foolish for that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bush didn&#8217;t have his crystal ball functioning too well at the time. And even looking back it&#8217;s not clear at all what &#8220;talk&#8221; would have accomplished. You have an extremely myopic and shallow view of international politics.</p>
<p>I agree that he should have been more active, I&#8217;ll put it to you that way. Iran was and remains a bigger threat than Iraq, but Iraq was an easier sell. Iran has been the biggest nonnuclear threat in the world since 1979. Things can only get worse in that respect.</p>
<p>But you know, most of the people in the world are peaceful, yada yada, so I&#8217;m sure some insane Shia lunatic won&#8217;t actually carry out any of those threats they&#8217;ve been articulating for over 3 decades. No problem because most people are peaceful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/shoshana-bryen/underneath-the-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-5319427</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2013 00:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211696#comment-5319427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;We can actually begin having REAL talks with Iran.&quot;

REAL talks?  I think I am for that. That didn&#039;t happen and worse, we let them off the hook without demanding any guarantees that we should.

&quot;Talk about Afghanistan, terrorism, Iraq etc. IF we want to be successful in Iraq and Afghanistan we have to work with the Iranians. It&#039;s that simple.&quot;

What you say is fundamentally true except for your remark that it&#039;s simple. It&#039;s not simple at all. Your problem is that your arguments are too simple. Caving in is one choice to &quot;work with&quot; Iran. It&#039;s just the worst choice we have.

&quot;We can&#039;t be at war with every single country in the middle east.&quot;

We could be in theory, but we&#039;re not. That&#039;s a non sequitur.

&quot;Iran does not have nukes. That&#039;s a non sequitur.&quot;


Completely wrong. Iran has a process to produce nuclear weapons. These complex processes have incredible project inertia. It may be too late as we speak. It&#039;s the most fundamental issue. Second is their history of supporting global jihad terror operations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We can actually begin having REAL talks with Iran.&#8221;</p>
<p>REAL talks?  I think I am for that. That didn&#8217;t happen and worse, we let them off the hook without demanding any guarantees that we should.</p>
<p>&#8220;Talk about Afghanistan, terrorism, Iraq etc. IF we want to be successful in Iraq and Afghanistan we have to work with the Iranians. It&#8217;s that simple.&#8221;</p>
<p>What you say is fundamentally true except for your remark that it&#8217;s simple. It&#8217;s not simple at all. Your problem is that your arguments are too simple. Caving in is one choice to &#8220;work with&#8221; Iran. It&#8217;s just the worst choice we have.</p>
<p>&#8220;We can&#8217;t be at war with every single country in the middle east.&#8221;</p>
<p>We could be in theory, but we&#8217;re not. That&#8217;s a non sequitur.</p>
<p>&#8220;Iran does not have nukes. That&#8217;s a non sequitur.&#8221;</p>
<p>Completely wrong. Iran has a process to produce nuclear weapons. These complex processes have incredible project inertia. It may be too late as we speak. It&#8217;s the most fundamental issue. Second is their history of supporting global jihad terror operations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward smith</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/shoshana-bryen/underneath-the-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-5319314</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211696#comment-5319314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see Iran occupying any other country. Saudi Arabia invaded Bahrain with tanks. Not Iran. America invaded Iraq and occupied it. America invaded Afghanistan. Not Iran. Iran hasn&#039;t invaded a country in over 200 years. The only hegemony your talking about is Americas.  

&quot;China and Iran are each clones of the Soviet Union. Is that your theory?&quot;

Are your parents brother and sister? I said the propaganda and lies surrounding Iran are the same lies used about China in the 70&#039;s.  

&quot;However, if the Iranians will use good enough ingredients we won&#039;t worry
 about their Shia fantasies to dominate the world and bring on the last 
days with a nuclear exchange.&quot;  



The only way Iran is gonna have Nuclear weapons is if Israel drops THEIR nuclear weapons on Iranian soil.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see Iran occupying any other country. Saudi Arabia invaded Bahrain with tanks. Not Iran. America invaded Iraq and occupied it. America invaded Afghanistan. Not Iran. Iran hasn&#8217;t invaded a country in over 200 years. The only hegemony your talking about is Americas.  </p>
<p>&#8220;China and Iran are each clones of the Soviet Union. Is that your theory?&#8221;</p>
<p>Are your parents brother and sister? I said the propaganda and lies surrounding Iran are the same lies used about China in the 70&#8242;s.  </p>
<p>&#8220;However, if the Iranians will use good enough ingredients we won&#8217;t worry<br />
 about their Shia fantasies to dominate the world and bring on the last<br />
days with a nuclear exchange.&#8221;  </p>
<p>The only way Iran is gonna have Nuclear weapons is if Israel drops THEIR nuclear weapons on Iranian soil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward smith</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/shoshana-bryen/underneath-the-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-5319310</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 22:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211696#comment-5319310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bush was coming off of his &quot;mission accomplished&quot; in Iraq. He was not interested in talking with the Iranians. He was foolish for that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush was coming off of his &#8220;mission accomplished&#8221; in Iraq. He was not interested in talking with the Iranians. He was foolish for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward smith</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/shoshana-bryen/underneath-the-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-5319306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 22:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211696#comment-5319306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We can actually begin having REAL talks with Iran. Talk about Afghanistan, terrorism, Iraq etc. IF we want to be successful in Iraq and Afghanistan we have to work with the Iranians. It&#039;s that simple. We can&#039;t be at war with every single country in the middle east. It will Bankrupt My country and my people.  



Iran does not have nukes. That&#039;s a non sequitur.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can actually begin having REAL talks with Iran. Talk about Afghanistan, terrorism, Iraq etc. IF we want to be successful in Iraq and Afghanistan we have to work with the Iranians. It&#8217;s that simple. We can&#8217;t be at war with every single country in the middle east. It will Bankrupt My country and my people.  </p>
<p>Iran does not have nukes. That&#8217;s a non sequitur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/shoshana-bryen/underneath-the-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-5318636</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 01:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211696#comment-5318636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Real negotiations with Iran. Negotiating trade, Afghanistan terrorism etc&quot;

Wait, you say you&#039;re happy because these issues are resolved? WTF?

&quot;Not some non sequitir about some nuclear energy program that 197 other nations have.&quot;



Nobody cares about peaceful use of nuclear reactors. Nobody but leftists. And they seem to be very happy with Iran having nukes. Hmm. Maybe they&#039;re Marxists rooting for the &quot;oppressed classes?&quot; Maybe that includes you?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Real negotiations with Iran. Negotiating trade, Afghanistan terrorism etc&#8221;</p>
<p>Wait, you say you&#8217;re happy because these issues are resolved? WTF?</p>
<p>&#8220;Not some non sequitir about some nuclear energy program that 197 other nations have.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nobody cares about peaceful use of nuclear reactors. Nobody but leftists. And they seem to be very happy with Iran having nukes. Hmm. Maybe they&#8217;re Marxists rooting for the &#8220;oppressed classes?&#8221; Maybe that includes you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/shoshana-bryen/underneath-the-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-5318635</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 01:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211696#comment-5318635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The rhetoric and propaganda surrounding Iran is no different than the rhetoric and propaganda that was surrounding the godless red chinese who couldn&#039;t be reasoned with back in the 70&#039;s.&quot;

I agree that the left has not come up with any new excuses. But the case against Iran is only similar in the concern that each want to replace our form of government or at the very least our hegemony.

China and Iran are each clones of the Soviet Union. Is that your theory?

&quot;Well guess what? There are Mcdonalds in China now. U mad?&quot;



Yeah, I&#039;m angry because the Big Macs there in China use inferior beef. However, if the Iranians will use good enough ingredients we won&#039;t worry about their Shia fantasies to dominate the world and bring on the last days with a nuclear exchange.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The rhetoric and propaganda surrounding Iran is no different than the rhetoric and propaganda that was surrounding the godless red chinese who couldn&#8217;t be reasoned with back in the 70&#8242;s.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree that the left has not come up with any new excuses. But the case against Iran is only similar in the concern that each want to replace our form of government or at the very least our hegemony.</p>
<p>China and Iran are each clones of the Soviet Union. Is that your theory?</p>
<p>&#8220;Well guess what? There are Mcdonalds in China now. U mad?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m angry because the Big Macs there in China use inferior beef. However, if the Iranians will use good enough ingredients we won&#8217;t worry about their Shia fantasies to dominate the world and bring on the last days with a nuclear exchange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/shoshana-bryen/underneath-the-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-5318634</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211696#comment-5318634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Iran was willing to discuss a grand bargain.&quot;



Hudna on the path to global Shiite supremacy. Wonderful. Did you read the article? America does not want or need a &quot;camel.&quot; We can not tolerate a &quot;camel&quot; when we want an enforceable peace agreement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Iran was willing to discuss a grand bargain.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hudna on the path to global Shiite supremacy. Wonderful. Did you read the article? America does not want or need a &#8220;camel.&#8221; We can not tolerate a &#8220;camel&#8221; when we want an enforceable peace agreement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/shoshana-bryen/underneath-the-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-5318633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 01:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211696#comment-5318633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who is ignorant and myopic? Edward smith.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is ignorant and myopic? Edward smith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward smith</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/shoshana-bryen/underneath-the-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-5318283</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 05:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211696#comment-5318283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Real negotiations with Iran. Negotiating trade, Afghanistan terrorism etc. Not some non sequitir about some nuclear energy program that 197 other nations have.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real negotiations with Iran. Negotiating trade, Afghanistan terrorism etc. Not some non sequitir about some nuclear energy program that 197 other nations have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward smith</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/shoshana-bryen/underneath-the-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-5318281</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 05:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211696#comment-5318281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rhetoric and propaganda surrounding Iran is no different than the rhetoric and propaganda that was surrounding the godless red chinese who couldn&#039;t be reasoned with back in the 70&#039;s. Well guess what? There are Mcdonalds in China now. U mad?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rhetoric and propaganda surrounding Iran is no different than the rhetoric and propaganda that was surrounding the godless red chinese who couldn&#8217;t be reasoned with back in the 70&#8242;s. Well guess what? There are Mcdonalds in China now. U mad?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward smith</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/shoshana-bryen/underneath-the-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-5318279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211696#comment-5318279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not correct. Iran has been reaching out to the west for years. We are finally coming around only to have the israelis try to throw a monkey wrench in all of our plans. 



Who possesses over 100 nuclear weapons illegally? Israel. Who supported the racist regime of south africa for years? Israel. Who is NOT a signatory to the NPT? Israel. Who is not a signatory to the geneva conventions? Israel. Who is interfering in out Political affairs? Israel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not correct. Iran has been reaching out to the west for years. We are finally coming around only to have the israelis try to throw a monkey wrench in all of our plans. </p>
<p>Who possesses over 100 nuclear weapons illegally? Israel. Who supported the racist regime of south africa for years? Israel. Who is NOT a signatory to the NPT? Israel. Who is not a signatory to the geneva conventions? Israel. Who is interfering in out Political affairs? Israel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward smith</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/shoshana-bryen/underneath-the-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-5318278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 04:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211696#comment-5318278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those in power in Iran who offered a grand bargain to Bush in 2005. Bush in all his ignorance, ignored them. 



Iran was willing to discuss a grand bargain.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those in power in Iran who offered a grand bargain to Bush in 2005. Bush in all his ignorance, ignored them. </p>
<p>Iran was willing to discuss a grand bargain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kasandra</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/shoshana-bryen/underneath-the-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-5318257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kasandra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 02:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211696#comment-5318257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re analysis, correct as it is, isn&#039;t reaching &quot;Edward smith.&quot;  Reason and logic don&#039;t get delivered to Gum Drop Lane in Lollipop Land.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re analysis, correct as it is, isn&#8217;t reaching &#8220;Edward smith.&#8221;  Reason and logic don&#8217;t get delivered to Gum Drop Lane in Lollipop Land.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/shoshana-bryen/underneath-the-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-5318181</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 00:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211696#comment-5318181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;We can actually begin having real negotiations with Iran.&quot;



We were negotiating with them. It&#039;s caving in that people here object to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We can actually begin having real negotiations with Iran.&#8221;</p>
<p>We were negotiating with them. It&#8217;s caving in that people here object to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/shoshana-bryen/underneath-the-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-5333410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 00:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211696#comment-5333410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Edward smith                     •         a day ago     
&quot;We Americans. I&#039;m sick and tired of these scumbags interfering in our politics. Here we have a chance at peace and this psycho netanyahu keeps getting in the way. Obama killed Osama Bin Laden, this kike better tread lightly!&quot;


Lovely sentiments from the lover of peace.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edward smith                     •         a day ago<br />
&#8220;We Americans. I&#8217;m sick and tired of these scumbags interfering in our politics. Here we have a chance at peace and this psycho netanyahu keeps getting in the way. Obama killed Osama Bin Laden, this kike better tread lightly!&#8221;</p>
<p>Lovely sentiments from the lover of peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/shoshana-bryen/underneath-the-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-5318180</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 00:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211696#comment-5318180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &quot;red chinese&quot; are ultimately pragmatic. They are the polar opposite of the Iranian regime when it comes to questions of materialism and realpolitik. The Chinese never wanted to get nuked by anyone in return. Some in Iran might not care, or might even want to get hit.


And even so we still had to be more careful how we operated, and it was still a loss to democracy when the the Soviets and the Chinese went nuclear.


All of your arguments are extremely naive. We should oppose ALL nuclear proliferation of our opposition, and most of all those who might think it&#039;s just fine with Allah to blow the world up.


Can you follow the conversation? At some point when it&#039;s clear that our nuclear program was intended to avoid losing out to another nuclear power, we can possibly wind down our own programs.


Or we can just submit to some alien sovereign and live in &quot;peace.&quot; Right?


Are you an American?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;red chinese&#8221; are ultimately pragmatic. They are the polar opposite of the Iranian regime when it comes to questions of materialism and realpolitik. The Chinese never wanted to get nuked by anyone in return. Some in Iran might not care, or might even want to get hit.</p>
<p>And even so we still had to be more careful how we operated, and it was still a loss to democracy when the the Soviets and the Chinese went nuclear.</p>
<p>All of your arguments are extremely naive. We should oppose ALL nuclear proliferation of our opposition, and most of all those who might think it&#8217;s just fine with Allah to blow the world up.</p>
<p>Can you follow the conversation? At some point when it&#8217;s clear that our nuclear program was intended to avoid losing out to another nuclear power, we can possibly wind down our own programs.</p>
<p>Or we can just submit to some alien sovereign and live in &#8220;peace.&#8221; Right?</p>
<p>Are you an American?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 773/814 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-29 23:09:41 by W3 Total Cache -->