The Radicalism of Michelle Obama

Michelle Obama

Like Bill Clinton’s female counterpart Hillary, Michelle Obama is arguably more radical in her outlook than her husband. Leon Puissegur at Freedom Outpost is in the midst of compiling what can be gleaned from Mrs. Obama’s light historical footprint, and what he has compiled from her younger days is illuminating.

More recently, Mrs. Obama’s February 2008 reaction to her husband’s breakout performance in the Democratic primaries may have been the most direct window into her soul we will ever see.

Her husband Barack’s presidential candidacy had turned an important corner earlier that month. He outperformed rival Hillary Clinton in a slew of contests on February 5 and 12, establishing a significant lead in Democratic Convention delegates and a clear perception of unstoppable momentum. To Mrs. Clinton’s chagrin, the “first black president” was in the process of completely trumping the “first woman president.”

So what emotions should one have expected from Michelle, a seasoned political spouse, once it was evident that her husband had just become the favorite to win the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination? Positivity, excitement, and optimism, of course.

But that’s not what we saw.

Instead, she acted as if some — but far from all — of the weight of over a quarter century of misery had been lifted from her shoulders — not once, but twice in the same day:

Speaking in Milwaukee, Wisconsin today, would-be First Lady Michelle Obama said, “for the first time in my adult life I am proud of my country because it feels like hope is finally making a comeback.”

Then in Madison, she said, “For the first time in my adult lifetime, I’m really proud of my country, and not just because Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change.”

Michelle Obama has been an adult since her eighteenth birthday on January 17, 1982.

The second statement, moving from “I’m proud” to “I’m really proud,” looks like a reluctant and impotent attempt, especially when seen on video, to water down the first.

Despite her Madison protestation, Mrs. Obama’s newfound pride was almost definitely short-lived and, to the extent that it ever existed, completely about her husband’s success. It was not at all about “hope,” or what it might have said about America’s willingness to consider a presidential candidate regardless of his or her color.

An early March 2008 New Yorker magazine article, “The Other Obama: Michelle Obama and the politics of candor,” exposed the self-adopted strident tone of Mrs. Obama’s stump speeches:

Obama begins with a broad assessment of life in America in 2008, and life is not good: we’re a divided country, we’re a country that is “just downright mean,” we are “guided by fear,” we’re a nation of cynics, sloths, and complacents. “We have become a nation of struggling folks who are barely making it every day,” she said, as heads bobbed in the pews. “Folks are just jammed up, and it’s gotten worse over my lifetime. And, doggone it, I’m young. Forty-four!”

… “The life that I’m talking about that most people are living has gotten progressively worse since I was a little girl. . . . So if you want to pretend like there was some point over the last couple of decades when your lives were easy, I want to meet you!”

Collins importantly noted that Mrs. Obama composed the speech herself, delivering it “without notes” — and, it would appear, without a teleprompter.

There’s very little chance that Mrs. Obama’s pride lasted. One does not suddenly get past such a repeated display of open contempt for America and the everyday people who live in it and permanently find pride simply because your husband is on a political hot streak.

Michelle Obama’s long-term and still-existing shortage of pride originates in a deep-seated belief that America remains, in the words of leading black socialist Cornel West, “a ‘racist patriarchal‘ nation where white supremacy continues to define everyday life.”

In 1984, while an undergraduate student at Princeton, then-Michelle Robinson promoted and attended “a ‘Black Solidarity’ event for guest lecturer Manning Marable, who at the time was, according to West, probably ‘the best known black Marxist in the country.'”

Her 1985 thesis buys into the harmful belief of 1960s black radicals Stokely Carmichael and Charles Hamilton that “Before a group can enter the open society, it must close ranks.” The problem is that once groupthink dominates, philosophical separation from the rest of society almost never goes away.

Michelle was married to Barack Obama in 1992 at the Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ. Wright is best known for saying less than a decade later that America, based on its history of “terrorism,” deserved what happened to it in the 9/11 terrorist attacks. He invoked Malcolm X as he said that “America’s chickens are coming home to roost.”

Less visible but even more crucial is Wright’s belief in the “American/European Rhetorical Ethic,” which states the following:

Rhetorical ethic is the hypocritical exercise of white supremacy used to service the same. It sets laws that are only to be adhered to by others. But if those laws or structures get in the way of white supremacist actions of power, they will not apply. Such is the history and current state of this American government.

In broader terms, the ethic sees the law as an artificial construct only to be applied to the powerless and which can safely be ignored by the powerful. Now that they’re in power, it’s interesting how operating above the law — “the hypocritical exercise of leftist supremacy,” if you will — seems to be the guiding philosophy of Barack Obama’s presidential administration.

When the spoken and written statements of Wright and other TUCC clerics threatened to derail Obama’s 2008 general election campaign, the Obamas chose to resign. Even though the resignation letter’s text was written in first person singular, its lead signature, conveniently released on a Saturday evening, was Michelle’s. The resignation letter made sure not to reject Wright’s “theology,” which when broken down was essentially Black Liberation Theology tinged with bitter, delusional attacks on “white supremacy.”

Though she has largely restrained herself since her husband assumed the presidency, there’s little evidence to support the notion that Michelle Obama’s core beliefs have changed. Unless we see otherwise, the default assumption should be: Once a far leftist, always a far leftist.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

  • Larry Larkin

    Having read (it took months with a wire brush and industrial solvent to get my brain clean afterwards) her senior thesis it made one thing clear.
    She only passed that paper and graduated because of the carefully calculated topic. No way in hell were they going to fail her on it, even though it deserved it. As a former teacher I wouldn’t have accepted that standard from a high school freshman, and I sure as hell would have failed if I had handed in something like that as a uni student in my final year in 1983.

  • herb benty

    The MSM really should have their behinds tanned, for keeping Obama’s true nature and beliefs fogged before the election.

    • davarino

      Kinda like Morsi. They didnt really know him before electing him.

      • herb benty

        Very similar, no wonder Obama sent the kitchen sink in to try and reverse the direction of Egypt, Obama suddenly realized the American Military might just side with the People and oust him!

        • davarino

          Oh but the Supreme court might rule that as unconstitutional

          • herb benty

            By then the Supreme Court wouldn’t matter, the people would have taken over.

  • Hilary 2016!

    I think she’s fantastic. Love her! And looking forward to Hilary 2016 and 2020!!

    • davarino

      Right on sister, because they have done such a GREAT job these last 5 years. I’m sure the nest 3 will be fantastic. Can you give me an estimate about where unemployment will be? How bout the S&P? The middle east? Obamacare/healthcare in general?
      Or are they just rock stars to you and none of that stuff matters?

    • nomoretraitors

      Yeah, anybody who hates America is fantastic, right?

    • BilllH

      Since you’re such a fan, you should learn how to spell Hillary. Other than getting a couple of people killed, what did she accomplish as Sec of State?

      • John E Coleman

        Bill , That’s how the proud African American’s Spell { Hilary ? }

    • quousque

      Yes, she is as the lowest common denominator between herself, her hubby and his dalliances and the present occupant of the WH. Camille Paglia, committed progressive, has slightly different take on the value of Ms. Clinton as a potential candidate; check it out.

    • iluvisrael

      what’s so fantastic about an angry grifter?

    • Guest

      Screw you and Hil and an administration hell bent on destroying America. Go back to Ghana or wherever small minds live.

    • Guest

      Screw you and Hillarous and an administration h*ll bent on destroying America. Go back to Ghana and drink the fruit juice

    • whatistruth

      Screw you and hillarous and an administration h*ll bent on destroying America. Go back to Ghana and drink the kook aid/fruit juice.

    • TW of G 58

      Check her record, her support of past women (Marge Sanger comes to mind) and she seems to conveniently leave a post she has been placed in when the heat is on her watch…yeah, right, sure, real good candidate!
      (all feciciously!!_

    • Tim Chrisolm

      “For the first time in my life Im proud of my country” “America is a downright mean country” “All that for a damn flag” “Im ashamed to be American” If she is ashamed to be an American, she is NOT an American. And if you share her sentiments, (and it certainly seems like you do) then neither are you.

  • Elizabeth Cape Cod

    It’s a shame that michelle never found anything to be proud of her country for in her 30 some years of adulthood. This is a woman who sees life through the most narrow of prisms.

    • Christopher Riddle

      Everything she got was”handed”to her!Instead of being”Grateful”;she chose”Resentful”!!!I’m certain that she saw this as nothing more than an approbation of her long-held feelings that she was getting all this”handed”to her because of”WHITE GUILT”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      • TW of G 58

        I call it ‘Black Guilt’… the ‘tarnished’ silver platter, spoons, you name it.
        check out what color the silver changes after being tarnished!!!
        M (Robinson) Obummer is a S.A.D. person (Socially Acromonious & Dreadfull) person.

        • TW of G 58

          And Hillary? She needs to profess herself a card-carrying member of the socialist party ( echos of maxine Waters??)

      • SorryJeffersonWeTried

        Back in the day, grown-ups used to say ‘ If you dont earn it, you wont respect it ‘ Well, now she makes sense as to her lack of repect for anything

        • Christopher Riddle

          The Obamas have been raised with a feeling of”Entitlement”that’s beyond belief!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —– Original Message —–
          From: Disqus
          Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:08 AM
          Subject: Re: New comment posted on The Radicalism of Michelle Obama


          A new comment was posted on FrontPage Magazine
          SorryJeffersonWeTried Back in the day, grown-ups used to say ‘ If you dont earn it, you wont respect it ‘ Well, now she makes sense as to her lack of repect for anything
          2:08 a.m., Monday Aug. 26

          Reply to SorryJeffersonWeTried

          SorryJeffersonWeTried’s comment is in reply to Christopher Riddle: Everything she got was”handed”to her!Instead of being”Grateful”;she chose”Resentful”!!!I’m certain that she saw this as nothing more than …
          Read more


          You’re receiving this message because you’re signed up to receive notifications about replies to christopherriddle.
          You can unsubscribe from emails about replies to christopherriddle by replying to this email with “unsubscribe” or reduce the rate with which these emails are sent by adjusting your notification settings.

    • whatistruth

      Apparently, Michelle is not proud of the thousands and thousands who shed their bled so she could become FLOTUS. She’s a stupid hypocrite.

  • chhelo

    It was quite evident months prior to the election in 2008 the Obama’s were both committed Marxist. It was there in plain sight for all to see and those that voted for Obama and regret it are now suffering the consequences along with the rest of us.

    Just remember Hillary is a committed Marxist as well.

    • Harry Black

      When you use the word “Marxism,” you have no idea what you’re talking about, just indulging in the usual looney rhetorical escalation Frontpage encourages.

      • nomoretraitors

        When you whine about “racism” and “oppression,” you have no idea what you’re talking about. You just accept the leftist drivel spewed out by MSNBC and Media Matters.

        • TW of G 58

          I agree! The poor sap (Harry Black) has nothing but blame-shifting and has been brainwashed by what I call the MainScreamNumbskullBrainlessChannel (MSNBC) and de-facto no-facts Media Matters. hmmm… perhaps of the same mind as the radical terrorists who have robbed or brainwashed their children in Arab countries to hate people they disagree with?

          • TW of G 58

            Frontpage is reputable, factual, and holds this administration to task and accountability…you, Harry Black, go blindly into the night with merely a ‘tingle up the leg’ ( Chris matthews, sic)

          • Harry Black

            Puhlease. Frontpage is “reputable.” It’s “factual.” The funniest joke I’ve heard all week (and I’ve heard quite a few).

          • Harry Black

            Read my reply to the picturesquely named “nomoretraitors.” You too have no idea of what you’re talking about. Have you ever bothered to read anything by Marx? Or you just happen to know that he’s the inspiration behind MSNBC. (Btw, your MainScreamNumbskullBrainlessChannel isn’t clever. Such a tactic marks you as semi-literate and uneducated.)

        • Harry Black

          I stand by what I said. I didn’t say anything about “racism” or “oppression.” Moreover, I don’t watch MSNBC and Media Matters. Marxism, which was the issue I raised. What exactly do you know about Marxism? Be specific or I won’t have any reason to take you seriously.

          • semus

            If you never watch MSNBC how do you know if Marx is or isn’t an inspiration? Here’s little fact about Marx, he knew and wrote that he could never live in the world he was advocating.

          • Harry Black

            Because nowhere in the mainstream media right or left is Marx or Marxism a factor. (And OK I’ve seen enough of that fearsome “Marxist” Rachel Maddow to know that whatever her political philosophy, she’s no Marxist.) But when it comes to FrontPage’s paranoid world view, Obama, a staunch pro-capitalist president in the tradition of FDR, LBJ, and Bill Clinton, is somehow a “Marxist,” a “socialist,” and a “Nazi” all at once, which is to say these words simply mean you don’t like him. This reduces discourse to the level of the sandbox, which is mainly where FrontPage is at. As for your “little fact about Marx,” since you’ve read nothing by Marx, it seems to me your “fact” is simply rumor or second-hand. Don’t bother to reply. If you do, however, won’t I waste my time answering you.

      • Fred Reinhard

        Harry; What Frontpage of any Liberal Paper in the USA have you ever seen Comrade Hillary or the FRAUD in CHIEF and his wife tagged as Marxist, Communists, Socialists, Anarchists, Maoists, Trotskyites?
        They might believe those ideologies in their bedrooms; but what goes on in a bedroom should stay in the bedroom!

        • John E Coleman

          Well written Michael ! Your word’s had to come from
          THE HEART ! and I thank You .

          • Michael__Durham

            thanks, Mr. Coleman, and thank you for your service to (what’s left of) our country. Semper Fi & oorah! (even if i never served).

      • Michael__Durham

        See, “Harry B.” knows ALL ABOUT what “real Marxism” *ISN’T* all about. He’s an EXPERT on what Marxism *ISN’T*. See, he just KNOWS (by osmosis?) that “Barry H.”, Michelle and Hillary AREN’T Marxists. How does he know that? Because, like them, Harry B. isn’t a Marxist, either. He can’t be. Nor can they!

        They can’t be! True Marxism has never been achieved! …but they just keep trying. Just give them one more chance to get it right! Just one more! Just the kind of chance, the kind of Change They Can Hope for! Yes, They can! Must. Keep. Trying.

        If Stalin, Mao, Lenin, darling Che, the Jong Un’s & ILLS, the Obamas (both Michelle, and Barry Hussein (“Barry H.”), Harry B, Pelosi, and the Clintons were any closer to being more truly Marxist, then there would be real peace, real Marxism on earth! Why? Because every other single human being on the face of the earth would be murdered. And the last one standing would likely end up offing himself, sooner or later (since these….creatures…are all Leftist death cultists). Of course, in an ideal, truly Marxist world, that last person would be Harry B. But even then…if he offs himself…then what? No one left! Aren’t Marxists supposed to be living people? I guess questions such as these (“How many dead angels can dance on the head of a pin?”) can be resolved only by the likes of “Critical Thinkers” like Noam Chomsky, Derrida, Hume (and “Harry B”?)

        The problem is, neither Barry H. nor Harry B. have gotten the memo, and they never will.

        Nevertheless: Forward! Democrat “Progressives” of the world, unite; you have everything to lose but your Change.

        • John E Coleman

          Michael , I meant to comment on your post !

          But it goes just as well to Fred !!

        • Harry Black

          Who can read this mind-numbing rant. You have no idea what you’re talking about. Or do you? If you do, you can begin by distinguishing between Marxism and Liberalism, contrary to FrontPage’s preference for the reductio ad absurdum.

          • Michael__Durham

            Who can read it? Why, Harry B. can, apparently Or Is he unaware of the fact that he can read? What a peculiar conundrum into which he’s placed himself.

            At any rate –

            Harry B, like his paragon, Barry H. talks – and lives by – the Alinsky book: ridicule and ad hominem. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it”

            To wit: “mind-numbing rant”, “no idea what you’re talking about” (Harry B. is particularly fond of this deflection)…as opposed to directly addressing my points, seriatim.

            But let’s get down to brass tacks:

            There are only two salient differences between “liberals” (small-L; the Bolsheviks semantically hijacked the word back in the 1920s), and Marxists:

            1.) Marxists know what they’re doing.

            2.) “liberals” devotedly read “The Village Voice” and “The Daily Worker”, and Marxists line the bottoms of their canary cages with them, where they belong.

            Give them their due; Marxists, unlike their drooling “progressive” admirers, are nothing, if not practical.

            Oh well.

            Harry B. may now return to his ongoing inability to tell whether he can read, or not. And to his drool.

          • Harry Black

            You'[re a clever fellow Durham. Applause! You know what Marxism is–and without ever having read a word of Marx! This is why I’m getting bored with the denizens of the FrontPage sandbox.

          • Michael__Durham

            Harry B is just a trolling little Leftist @ssclown, and a Barry H-boot-licking fanboi.

            …just sayin’

          • Curt

            Oh and you’re saying it so well Mr. Durham, Harry B has no chance with you behind the podium. His best bet would be to return to the little troll world from whence he came.

          • Harvey_Steele

            fellow travelers and useful idiots abound in DC

          • Edwin Alexander

            well, are we talking about classical liberalism, or the hi-jacked “liberalism” of the modern day progressives, According to Marxist analysis, class conflict within capitalism arises due to intensifying contradictions between highly-productive mechanized and socialized production performed by the proletariat, and private ownership and private appropriation of the surplus product in the form of surplus value (profit) by a small minority of private owners called the bourgeoisie. As the contradiction becomes apparent to the proletariat, social unrest between the two antagonistic classes intensifies, culminating in a social revolution. The eventual long-term outcome of this revolution would be the establishment of socialism – a socioeconomic system based on cooperative ownership of the means of production, distribution based on one’s contribution, and production organized directly for use. Karl Marx hypothesized that, as the productive forces and technology continued to advance, socialism would eventually give way to a communist stage of social development. Communism would be a classless, stateless, humane society based on common ownership and the principle of “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs”. Sounds like Obama, but in actuality, he is worse…

      • Merican

        Spoken like a true Cultural Marxist. Wake up tool, you’re guillotine bait.

      • TW of G 58

        actually, your’e the looney left(ist) when you defend the Obummers by your vitriol of those who have wisdom beyond your ‘chosen’ blindness. You prefer the easy road of a criminals creed of ” why can’t we all just get along” in order to have a mind that does not think at all ‘outside the box’ and think for yourself… pity, pity, pity.
        Get real!

      • TW of G 58

        your choices and arrogance sickens me…you sound as if you prefer a darkened mind like that of M.Obama.

        • Harry Black

          Obama’s darkened mind”! Interesting choice of words.

      • semus

        Somebody hit a nerve troll. The left never likes the truth.

        • Harry Black

          If you want “the truth” go somewhere else. You won’t find it on FrontPage.

          • ziggy zoggy

            Hairy Back, if you want to lie, go somewhere else.

      • kikorikid

        PROVE YOU DO! Write a short,100 words or less,
        statement on Marx’s “Objectification of labor”.
        OR just shut up. Otherwise admit this is another
        ideological harangue from your fine self.

        • Harry Black

          Why? To prove that I’ve read Marx’s 1844 Manuscripts? I have no need to prove anything to the likes of you.

          • kikorikid

            To help substantiate your credibility beyond
            your current “attack dog” configuration. Otherwise,
            its just not there.

          • Harry Black

            As I said, I have no need to prove anything to the likes of you or to the readers (if there are any) of these comments. Since I do know something about Marxism
            and socialism, I’m aware that the FPers’ use of words like “Marxism,” “socialism,” “fascism,” etc. doesn’t rise above the level of Kindergarteners calling each other names. What I’ve learned during my visits to this journalistic version of hell is that FP is a colossal waste of time. It’s no place for serious discussion, especially when personal abuse is the coin of the realm. It is no place for journalism since it traffics in racial and religious hatred. FP’s writers do nothing to educate their readership which, judging by the comments pages, is hopelessly ignorant of history, politics, and the corporate agendas FP is in fact promoting. If you love Monsanto, the Koch Brothers, and the 1%, this is the place for you. But whether you know it or not–and it seems to me FP zealots are clueless in this regard– most of you are working against your own interests. And if the policies you support succeed, you’ll find out what life is like after 65 without Social Security, without health
            insurance, and without your retirement savings, which the deregulated crooks on Wall Street will have stolen. You may be finding ths out already. In any case, good luck.

      • Harvey_Steele

        It quacks Harry.

    • Fred Reinhard

      You are spot on! The background of the Fraud in CHIEF and the FIRST LADY FRAUD were well known! But America was not listening or paying attention and the irony is; he was elected twice! Now fast forward and we will have another Marxist Comrade Hillary as POTUS!
      So I will have to assume we have more Comrades in America than Capitalists! Or to be less critical more Under-educated that will follow the command given over Twitter!

      • whatistruth

        O is a PINO. President in name only.

      • sherri palmer

        people who voted for Obama in 2012 just don’t have a brain

  • Loupdegarre

    Another student of Herbert Marcuse.

  • Frank W Brown

    The media is bought and paid for and will only report what their handlers allow, and it is NOT the TRUTH!

  • Clare Spark

    This is a good piece, with news for me. I had written several times about Michelle Robinson’s Princeton thesis, summarized briefly here: “POTUS, Michelle, and the end of the democratic republic.” I have no doubt that POTUS marches to her tunes.

  • Wayne Henry Braden

    Jealousy breeds hyprocrisy.

  • DontMessWithAmerica

    The Obamas have brought a race war to America. Advice to whitey: carry a weapon and when you see some black youngster looking ‘bored’ shoot’em right between the eyes before the shoot you in the back.

  • CelestiaQuesta

    Hollywood along with the radical liberal left sold America and the world one of the most brilliant shemes ever perpetrated on a powerful nation.
    The Wall Street bailouts, GM union bailout and purchase, military complex fraud, IRS hit list audits, NSA!CIA/DHS/ Spying, creating a militarized police state where every citizen is subject to stop and frisk and body scans.
    These and other despicable acts of abuse are taking place while fast and furious gun running to Mexico and other countries is sanctioned by our DOJ and State department.
    If these lying radical leftist liberal progressives are allowed power again in 2016 this country may never recover its greatness again.
    They seek to attack and undermine the people by using race and immigration to hide their failures to govern as mandated by the Consitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights.
    We are a country of legal immigrants, black, brown and white.
    We are not a country of millions of illegal invaders, gang banggers, gangsta thugs hellbent on the destruction of American culture and values.
    We are Americans.
    Stand up and stand tall.
    God bless America.

    • whatistruth

      Well said.

  • Babylonandon

    Too bad they did such a thorough job of removing Michelle’s mid-1990’s speeches from the Internet before the public got wind of them. I watched a couple of them before they were removed in early 2008 (some of us had Obama on our radar after 2006) and they would blow your mind. Wright is a circus clown. Michelle is frightening in a “Goebbels” kind of way but Jews aren’t the target of her bile. She is an expert on Critical Race Theory and as cold angry a character as has ever been.

    • TW of G 58

      yes… an angry woman… she and Hillary have much in common. Its no wonder the press reports they do not really like one another.
      Anyone who agrees with me, let’s get the truth out about their pasts.

      • Babylonandon

        The problem is that while much Hitlerina’s past is out there in the open for everyone to see, the Obama’s has been scrubbed to a fine degree and anything still around has been thoroughly discredited during the Birther argument (his Mom was an American so it didn’t matter where he was born BUT that served to distract and discredit from the really bad stuff … like Michelle having a Final Solution to the “Middleclass Whiteness” problem and achieving “Demographic Justice” which are the code phrases from her speeches. Use your imagination as to how she defines those terms.

      • Tim Chrisolm

        I agree with you 100% TW. But if we got the truth out about them, would anyone care? They knew everything mentioned in this article plus ALOT more and they STILL voted for Obama. Of all demographics, white women put the muslim terrorists in for a second term. They were determined to vote for Obama and nothing was gonna stand in their way. Remember this? “Your problem is that you always tell the truth”—Barak Obama to Jeremiah Wright. That was out there but it didn’t cost Obama a single vote. Yet they claimed they couldn’t vote for Romney b/c of his “lies.” We are seeing something that has never been seen in all of human history. People KNOWINGLY voting for their own destruction.

    • kikorikid

      “Critical Theory”,out of the Frankfurt School, of any stripe,”race”,
      has been thoroughly discredited as nothing but an excuse
      and façade that promotes “complaint”, Not critical analyses,
      complaint. An academic licence to whine. STFU!!!

      • Babylonandon

        More like and academic exercise in promoting genocide given her take on the matter …. the only place she wants to see crackers are as an added filler to a bowl of soup.

  • Tim Chrisolm

    And yet through all the above mentioned, whites STILL voted for Obama in great numbers, not once but TWICE. White women were an integral part of Obama winning his second term. Imagine a white person saying about blacks, the things B. Obama. M. Obama, and Jeremiah Wright said and blacks voting for that person. What are we to gather from this? Well, evidently, whites are the only demographic that will vote for someone that they know hates them.

    • anon

      Tim, No, whites are not the only demographic that votes for those who hate them…heavens no, BUT women, espec self hating feminists that reject their femininity do in fact, reject themselves. These whackjobs think that the only way of proving your worth as a woman is to be a man…and then we wonder why white men espec of the liberal variety have gone full tilt into ‘nancy land’ having lost their male parts along the way. Thus the moronic white feminist’s need to vote in a man (?), former cocaine creep who caves to his wife and that other fake feminist in the white house, Valerie. From all I have read, they pretty much have him by his ying yang…those two women should be put into some arab country if they think they have it so bad here. If it is true he is a homo, then no wonder he caves to the women. Between Meeshelle, Valerie, Pelosi and Hillary that poor man must look forward to the down low club of not so reverend Wright, but actually quite Wrong. As for all the nincompoop white liberal women who voted for numnuts, I can unequivocally say as a woman, I am truly ashamed and very embarrassed by these pseudo women’s lack of intellect, history, most of all, philosophy.
      But most of all, the fact they reject their own sexuality and uphold the LGBT PC MC BS, shows that basically they are NUTS.

  • James

    Where did she show contempt for the American people, as it says under the grey box? The actual quotes show her empathising with the millions of people who are struggling to make ends meet

    • SandyLester

      What a great satire post. Mickey doesn’t care about anyone or anything but only cares about her own power.

      • James

        Thanks for the sarcasm, any chance that anyone can answer my question though? Don’t tell me you’re dodging it!

        • SandyLester

          Ok. If you read the article, you would know about her contempt. Mickey’s contempt is great.

          • James

            Hmm, looks like you’re dodging the question again. WHERE, SPECIFICALLY, does she show contempt for the American people?

          • SandyLester

            “life is not good: we’re a divided country, we’re a country that is “just downright mean,” we are “guided by fear,” we’re a nation of cynics, sloths, and complacents. “We have become a nation of struggling folks
            who are barely making it every day,”

            “Folks are just jammed up, and it’s gotten worse over my lifetime.”

            “The life that I’m talking about that most people are living has gotten progressively worse since I was a little girl. . . . So if you want to pretend like there was some point over the last couple of decades when
            your lives were easy, I want to meet you!”

            Are you daft, or are you unable to read and follow along.

  • Robert Govan

    Michelle is a ACTOR. She is designed to piss you off. She does it on purpose its in her contract. Michelle is not her birth name, its what the studio gave her. Don’t fall over these frauds.

    • SandyLester

      Until a few years ago, they were called Barry and Mickey. Both of these people are frauds.

  • RCraigen

    Tom, you’re skimming fluff off the top instead of providing meat. Conservatives need hard facts and analysis. You can go a lot deeper than this on Ms. O. How about some words about Critical Race Theory and her close association with the principle proponents of this divisive philosophy? How about covering her activities at Harvard Law, such as her involvement in the occupation of the Dean’s Office during a racial agitation in favour of preferential hiring of blacks and women? Put that alongside her protestations in numerous interviews that prior to her husband getting into the race for the presidency that she hadn’t been involved at all in politics, and didn’t have a political bone in her body? was during the same period when her boyfriend Barry was getting deeply involved with Derrick Bell and others at the heart of the Critical Race Theory group.

  • snakeplisken

    Another reason why Obama has not mentioned anything about Chris Lane or the WW2 vet(Shorty) . Her influence as a race divider can never be misunderstood.

  • Rdlake

    They keep her away from tv interviews because it wouldn’t take much for her to reveal her racist self. This woman won’t be happy until everyone in power is black.

  • mickey

    Michelle Obama, not only looks like a Baboon, but she thinks like one also. I don’t know who’s more radical, Michelle, or Barrack?

  • Guest


  • Ron Hasek


  • SandyLester

    Interesting she is so angry. Micky grew up in the best neighborhoods, raised by professional parents, going to the best schools, going to the best colleges, having no show jobs where sh made butt loads of money…….does she just feel guilty?
    (ok, That was silly, of course not. She is a flipping communist, she deserves it all and more)

  • Robbins Mitchell

    Well,that’s affirmative action for you


    I wonder if Michelle obama allows her husband the same freedom to screw as many women that Hillary allowed Bill clinton to do….???

    • Rufus

      Bath house barry is not “in to” women…

  • James A. Tyler

    I only take contention with the first sentence, which argues Hillary is more liberal than Bill – I would argue the exact opposite.
    Hillary Rodham, after all, did start off her political career as a Goldwater Republican while Bill was attending Anti-Vietnam rallies. Bill easily exhibited a more bipartisan record than Obama, but only because the Midterm Elections, which cost him both the House and Senate, and the subsequent Government shutdown outright forced him to move to the center and negotiate with Republicans.
    Hillary, on the other hand, wasn’t coerced into negotiating with high-profile Republicans; in fact, it seemed that she was more bipartisan than her liberal compatriots would have liked, most evident in her decision to cast a vote in favor of the Iraq War Resolution, one which her husband apparently opposed.
    So, liberal as she is, Hillary is arguably the most conservative of the four, but its interesting that 2008 saw the two more conservative spouses go at it while the more liberal ones took shots from the sidelines, lol.

  • sherri palmer

    what a bitty