<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defying Evil: Albert Camus and His Century</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 11:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: barrycooper</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century/comment-page-1/#comment-5310098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[barrycooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209907#comment-5310098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not an atheist, and certainly share your belief.  What I liked about Camus, though, is that EVEN THOUGH he found no reason to believe in God, to believe in any form of transcendence, he still tried to find reasons to believe in human goodness.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not an atheist, and certainly share your belief.  What I liked about Camus, though, is that EVEN THOUGH he found no reason to believe in God, to believe in any form of transcendence, he still tried to find reasons to believe in human goodness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century/comment-page-1/#comment-5310030</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209907#comment-5310030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TB: &quot;I see you know nothing about Kierkegaard either, and you ignore how much he influenced Camus, who was an atheist existentialist. Kierkegaard was a Christian, not an existentialist.”

I said he was a great theologian.   To be a theologian in Europe 19th Century almost certainly meant that you were a Christian.   What kind of theologian did you think I was talking about?  

TB:  &quot;His existentialism was intended to provide context for the spiritual issues that face man. Camus and the existentialists borrowed a part of Kierkegaard&#039;s work, then turned it into an atheistic ideology. The scope of his thinking was far narrower than Kierkegaard&#039;s and devoid of any insight into human spirituality.”

Camus was the kind of man who consciously or unconsciously put Christ’s teachings into practice without talking about them.  Therefore his Christlike views of the plague upon mankind in the 20th Century are probably unrecognizable to you.

TB:  &quot;I’m not surprised at your ridiculous reply. You have a bad habit of making stupid, uninformed comments, including the ones where you showed your utter lack of understanding of Camus. One minute you&#039;re a Christian, the next you&#039;re spewing praise for an atheist...inaccurately.”

And for my part, I’m not at all surprised at your superficial views of what it means to be a Christian.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TB: &#8220;I see you know nothing about Kierkegaard either, and you ignore how much he influenced Camus, who was an atheist existentialist. Kierkegaard was a Christian, not an existentialist.”</p>
<p>I said he was a great theologian.   To be a theologian in Europe 19th Century almost certainly meant that you were a Christian.   What kind of theologian did you think I was talking about?  </p>
<p>TB:  &#8220;His existentialism was intended to provide context for the spiritual issues that face man. Camus and the existentialists borrowed a part of Kierkegaard&#8217;s work, then turned it into an atheistic ideology. The scope of his thinking was far narrower than Kierkegaard&#8217;s and devoid of any insight into human spirituality.”</p>
<p>Camus was the kind of man who consciously or unconsciously put Christ’s teachings into practice without talking about them.  Therefore his Christlike views of the plague upon mankind in the 20th Century are probably unrecognizable to you.</p>
<p>TB:  &#8220;I’m not surprised at your ridiculous reply. You have a bad habit of making stupid, uninformed comments, including the ones where you showed your utter lack of understanding of Camus. One minute you&#8217;re a Christian, the next you&#8217;re spewing praise for an atheist&#8230;inaccurately.”</p>
<p>And for my part, I’m not at all surprised at your superficial views of what it means to be a Christian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century/comment-page-1/#comment-5309935</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209907#comment-5309935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see you know nothing about Kierkegaard either, and you ignore how much he influenced Camus, who was an atheist existentialist. Kierkegaard was a Christian, not an existentialist. His existentialism was intended to provide context for the spiritual issues that face man. Camus and the existentialists borrowed a part of Kierkegaard&#039;s work, then turned it into an atheistic ideology. The scope of his thinking was far narrower than Kierkegaard&#039;s and devoid of any insight into human spirituality.


I&#039;m not surprised at your ridiculous reply. You have a bad habit of making stupid, uninformed comments, including the ones where you showed your utter lack of understanding of Camus. One minute you&#039;re a Christian, the next you&#039;re spewing praise for an atheist...inaccurately.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see you know nothing about Kierkegaard either, and you ignore how much he influenced Camus, who was an atheist existentialist. Kierkegaard was a Christian, not an existentialist. His existentialism was intended to provide context for the spiritual issues that face man. Camus and the existentialists borrowed a part of Kierkegaard&#8217;s work, then turned it into an atheistic ideology. The scope of his thinking was far narrower than Kierkegaard&#8217;s and devoid of any insight into human spirituality.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not surprised at your ridiculous reply. You have a bad habit of making stupid, uninformed comments, including the ones where you showed your utter lack of understanding of Camus. One minute you&#8217;re a Christian, the next you&#8217;re spewing praise for an atheist&#8230;inaccurately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century/comment-page-1/#comment-5309680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2013 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209907#comment-5309680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe:  “Apparently, in your philosophy, one&#039;s cognitive starting point is &quot;to be nice”. “


On the contrary, my philosophical starting point is death to tyrants.  On the other hand, as a practical matter, there are really too many tyrants in the world for us to try to manage all of them effectively, so my basic argument is that we should be doing whatever it takes to make America the “shining city on a hill” that John Winthrop talked about and the “last best hope of earth” that Abraham Lincoln talked about, and that, if it comes to pass that we have no alternative but to deal with a tyrant, we should do so quickly and effectively, with a minimum loss of American blood and treasure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe:  “Apparently, in your philosophy, one&#8217;s cognitive starting point is &#8220;to be nice”. “</p>
<p>On the contrary, my philosophical starting point is death to tyrants.  On the other hand, as a practical matter, there are really too many tyrants in the world for us to try to manage all of them effectively, so my basic argument is that we should be doing whatever it takes to make America the “shining city on a hill” that John Winthrop talked about and the “last best hope of earth” that Abraham Lincoln talked about, and that, if it comes to pass that we have no alternative but to deal with a tyrant, we should do so quickly and effectively, with a minimum loss of American blood and treasure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century/comment-page-1/#comment-5309529</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2013 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209907#comment-5309529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unlike you, I make a distinction between supporters of the republic and &quot;the mob&quot;.  Apparently, in your philosophy, one&#039;s cognitive starting point is &quot;to be nice&quot;. If we had only been nice to Hitler. Had we just been more accommodating toward Stalin. Idi Amin would have refrained from despotism had his &quot;fellow citizens&quot; been nice. Perhaps you should get a clue. There has never been, and there never will be a moral mob. Mobs brought those vile wastes of human skin into power. Authentic republicans are not required to be nice. They are required to understand the significance of the individual over and above the mob and that they own their selves and the property they acquire under the auspices of an agreed to governing document. They subscribe to moral absolutes - one of which is NOT being nice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlike you, I make a distinction between supporters of the republic and &#8220;the mob&#8221;.  Apparently, in your philosophy, one&#8217;s cognitive starting point is &#8220;to be nice&#8221;. If we had only been nice to Hitler. Had we just been more accommodating toward Stalin. Idi Amin would have refrained from despotism had his &#8220;fellow citizens&#8221; been nice. Perhaps you should get a clue. There has never been, and there never will be a moral mob. Mobs brought those vile wastes of human skin into power. Authentic republicans are not required to be nice. They are required to understand the significance of the individual over and above the mob and that they own their selves and the property they acquire under the auspices of an agreed to governing document. They subscribe to moral absolutes &#8211; one of which is NOT being nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century/comment-page-1/#comment-5309503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2013 14:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209907#comment-5309503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Authentic American Conservatives don’t regard their fellow citizens as “the mob” or “the masses” or in any other dehumanizing and nihilistic way, and Barry Goldwater was nothing if not an Authentic American Conservative who put the best interest of the American People before all things.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Authentic American Conservatives don’t regard their fellow citizens as “the mob” or “the masses” or in any other dehumanizing and nihilistic way, and Barry Goldwater was nothing if not an Authentic American Conservative who put the best interest of the American People before all things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century/comment-page-1/#comment-5309462</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209907#comment-5309462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Huh? Not so. Humanism is simply the fallacious belief that humans are basically good. Certainly not foundational to conservatism. &quot;Doing what&#039;s best for human beings&quot; is utilitarianism. That, too, is not necessarily conservatism. We conservatives believe in small government - even it it&#039;s bad, i.e., painful, for the mob. I think maybe you are off base somewhat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh? Not so. Humanism is simply the fallacious belief that humans are basically good. Certainly not foundational to conservatism. &#8220;Doing what&#8217;s best for human beings&#8221; is utilitarianism. That, too, is not necessarily conservatism. We conservatives believe in small government &#8211; even it it&#8217;s bad, i.e., painful, for the mob. I think maybe you are off base somewhat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century/comment-page-1/#comment-5332213</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 00:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209907#comment-5332213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Soren Kierkegaard was a great theologian, and one of the truly imaginative thinkers of the 19th Century.  But being born a hundred years before Albert Camus, he was largely spared the kind of grotesque humanitarian disasters that plagued so much of the 20th Century.  Ultimately Kierkegaard was a man much more inclined toward the theoretical than the actual, the absurd rather than the real, and the literary rather than the pragmatic.  

Having been born at the beginning of the deadliest and most inhumane century of the modern era, Albert Camus and Barry Goldwater were realists who could ill afford flights of fancy, escapist existentialism or absurdist fantasy, who understood very well man’s capacity for evil, and whose highest moral imperative was the search for truth in the defense of human dignity and human freedom as that struggle unfolded within the deadly nihilist reality of the 20th Century.  


No amount of theology, no amount of theoretical existentialism, and no amount of absurdist irony can obscure the grim human catastrophes that swept around the globe and flooded the consciousness and traumatized the minds of all reasonably sentient and aware human beings as a direct result of the the totalitarian purges of Stalinist Russia, Nazi Germany, Communist China and the killing fields of the Khmer Rouge.  Unfortunately, the highly imaginative and lovely existentialist theories of Soren Kierkegaard were of little value or solace in the context of the grim reality forged by the insane totalitarian fantasies of Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse Tung, and Pol Pot.  


What the 20th Century required above all things was courage to face the truth and the compassion to regard the freedom and the dignity of the individual human being above all things, and in that regard, no two men stood taller or blazed a more glorious and courageous trail than Albert Camus and Barry Goldwater.

The lesson to be learned from these two seemingly disparate but actually quite similar 20th Century moral and intellectual giants is simply this.  Those who choose to walk the path of radical freedom must be prepared to accept the radical truth that all men are created in the image of God, or they will surely lose their way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soren Kierkegaard was a great theologian, and one of the truly imaginative thinkers of the 19th Century.  But being born a hundred years before Albert Camus, he was largely spared the kind of grotesque humanitarian disasters that plagued so much of the 20th Century.  Ultimately Kierkegaard was a man much more inclined toward the theoretical than the actual, the absurd rather than the real, and the literary rather than the pragmatic.  </p>
<p>Having been born at the beginning of the deadliest and most inhumane century of the modern era, Albert Camus and Barry Goldwater were realists who could ill afford flights of fancy, escapist existentialism or absurdist fantasy, who understood very well man’s capacity for evil, and whose highest moral imperative was the search for truth in the defense of human dignity and human freedom as that struggle unfolded within the deadly nihilist reality of the 20th Century.  </p>
<p>No amount of theology, no amount of theoretical existentialism, and no amount of absurdist irony can obscure the grim human catastrophes that swept around the globe and flooded the consciousness and traumatized the minds of all reasonably sentient and aware human beings as a direct result of the the totalitarian purges of Stalinist Russia, Nazi Germany, Communist China and the killing fields of the Khmer Rouge.  Unfortunately, the highly imaginative and lovely existentialist theories of Soren Kierkegaard were of little value or solace in the context of the grim reality forged by the insane totalitarian fantasies of Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse Tung, and Pol Pot.  </p>
<p>What the 20th Century required above all things was courage to face the truth and the compassion to regard the freedom and the dignity of the individual human being above all things, and in that regard, no two men stood taller or blazed a more glorious and courageous trail than Albert Camus and Barry Goldwater.</p>
<p>The lesson to be learned from these two seemingly disparate but actually quite similar 20th Century moral and intellectual giants is simply this.  Those who choose to walk the path of radical freedom must be prepared to accept the radical truth that all men are created in the image of God, or they will surely lose their way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century/comment-page-1/#comment-5308616</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 23:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209907#comment-5308616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TB:  &quot;Goldwater was a humanist?????”


Of the highest order.  Conservatism is ultimately about doing what is best for human beings.  And that’s what the modernist neo-conservatives (i.e. not at all conservatives) have no clue about.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TB:  &#8220;Goldwater was a humanist?????”</p>
<p>Of the highest order.  Conservatism is ultimately about doing what is best for human beings.  And that’s what the modernist neo-conservatives (i.e. not at all conservatives) have no clue about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century/comment-page-1/#comment-5308590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 23:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209907#comment-5308590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Goldwater was a humanist????? 


As to my challenge for you: You can&#039;t do it, and you know it, so you&#039;re crawfishing out. That&#039;s fine with me, but if you are going to pretend you have knowledge, the least you could do is display some of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goldwater was a humanist????? </p>
<p>As to my challenge for you: You can&#8217;t do it, and you know it, so you&#8217;re crawfishing out. That&#8217;s fine with me, but if you are going to pretend you have knowledge, the least you could do is display some of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century/comment-page-1/#comment-5308586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 23:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209907#comment-5308586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Camus was greatly influenced by Kierkegaard, who began existentialism as a Christian perspective. Camus, Sartre, and the other existentialists denied God&#039;s ontological status, hence the empty, dreary, hopeless version of existentialism they promoted. 


Camus&#039; Sisyphus never gave up, but existed in a world were he was limited to his puny and finite mortality, devoid of Grace. He continued to do the same thing, hoping for different results, while having no reason to believe anything would change other than getting progressively more tired. That interpretation of man&#039;s lot certainly puts Camus at odds with Einstein, who famously suggested that doing the same thing repeatedly, but expecting different results is the definition of insanity (paraphrased). Camus vision of a noble man with no rational, or irrational, reason to hope is also at odds with Kierkegaard&#039;s perspective, where faith is the hope. To understand Camus, one must understand Kierkegaard.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Camus was greatly influenced by Kierkegaard, who began existentialism as a Christian perspective. Camus, Sartre, and the other existentialists denied God&#8217;s ontological status, hence the empty, dreary, hopeless version of existentialism they promoted. </p>
<p>Camus&#8217; Sisyphus never gave up, but existed in a world were he was limited to his puny and finite mortality, devoid of Grace. He continued to do the same thing, hoping for different results, while having no reason to believe anything would change other than getting progressively more tired. That interpretation of man&#8217;s lot certainly puts Camus at odds with Einstein, who famously suggested that doing the same thing repeatedly, but expecting different results is the definition of insanity (paraphrased). Camus vision of a noble man with no rational, or irrational, reason to hope is also at odds with Kierkegaard&#8217;s perspective, where faith is the hope. To understand Camus, one must understand Kierkegaard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century/comment-page-1/#comment-5308575</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 23:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209907#comment-5308575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That’s something you would never understand.  But the answer is clear.  Both men were realists and humanists.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That’s something you would never understand.  But the answer is clear.  Both men were realists and humanists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century/comment-page-1/#comment-5308564</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 22:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209907#comment-5308564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Camus, and all of the existentialists, were heavily influenced by Soren Kierkegaard. If you want to understand them, you may want to first read him. 


It is significant that the existential movement broke from Kierkegaard in an immense way: he was a Christian, and God was central to his perspective on our existential reality, whereas Camus, Sartre, et al were atheists. Note the underlying positivity of Kierkegaard versus the pervasive depression, emptiness, and malaise of the Existentialist perspective. It isn&#039;t a coincidence that the atheistic existentialism is do bleak with God removed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Camus, and all of the existentialists, were heavily influenced by Soren Kierkegaard. If you want to understand them, you may want to first read him. </p>
<p>It is significant that the existential movement broke from Kierkegaard in an immense way: he was a Christian, and God was central to his perspective on our existential reality, whereas Camus, Sartre, et al were atheists. Note the underlying positivity of Kierkegaard versus the pervasive depression, emptiness, and malaise of the Existentialist perspective. It isn&#8217;t a coincidence that the atheistic existentialism is do bleak with God removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century/comment-page-1/#comment-5308556</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209907#comment-5308556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, by your own definition, you admit to not being a true conservative. Very honest of you.


Now tell me again how Goldwater and Camus are somehow compatible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, by your own definition, you admit to not being a true conservative. Very honest of you.</p>
<p>Now tell me again how Goldwater and Camus are somehow compatible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century/comment-page-1/#comment-5308405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209907#comment-5308405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amen! It is the will of the God that discipline in the form of destruction and chaos must come, so everyone may come to repentance!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen! It is the will of the God that discipline in the form of destruction and chaos must come, so everyone may come to repentance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century/comment-page-1/#comment-5308239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209907#comment-5308239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Real conservatives plumb the depths of truth in all things.  Phony conservatives believe what they read in the newspapers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real conservatives plumb the depths of truth in all things.  Phony conservatives believe what they read in the newspapers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herb benty</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century/comment-page-1/#comment-5307812</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[herb benty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 07:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209907#comment-5307812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s why &quot;Progressives&quot; , NDP etc., are in fact, communists. They just use a &quot;cover&quot; title.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why &#8220;Progressives&#8221; , NDP etc., are in fact, communists. They just use a &#8220;cover&#8221; title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century/comment-page-1/#comment-5307802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 06:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209907#comment-5307802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Again with the non sequitur response...your specialty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again with the non sequitur response&#8230;your specialty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century/comment-page-1/#comment-5307801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 06:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209907#comment-5307801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Camus was a man of truth and love, and those are two things you will probably never understand.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Camus was a man of truth and love, and those are two things you will probably never understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/defying-evil-albert-camus-and-his-century/comment-page-1/#comment-5307800</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 06:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209907#comment-5307800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[America has become a nation that cherishes its vice more than its freedom. Self-indulgence leaves no room for God and arrogance no light by which to see. As a divided nation, we grope in the darkness, concerned mostly with saving ourselves, the chain we think will hoist us binds us instead.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America has become a nation that cherishes its vice more than its freedom. Self-indulgence leaves no room for God and arrogance no light by which to see. As a divided nation, we grope in the darkness, concerned mostly with saving ourselves, the chain we think will hoist us binds us instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 783/832 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 06:29:43 by W3 Total Cache -->