<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Politics of Resentment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/the-politics-of-resentment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/the-politics-of-resentment/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-politics-of-resentment</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 16:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: El Desdichado</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/the-politics-of-resentment/comment-page-1/#comment-5251903</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[El Desdichado]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 01:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198059#comment-5251903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You soulless, inhuman, mercantile philistines. 
You have aligned yourself with the reactionaries against the glorious and inexorable Communist future. More here: 

http://connecthook.wordpress.com/mine/various/6100-2/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You soulless, inhuman, mercantile philistines.<br />
You have aligned yourself with the reactionaries against the glorious and inexorable Communist future. More here: </p>
<p><a href="http://connecthook.wordpress.com/mine/various/6100-2/" rel="nofollow">http://connecthook.wordpress.com/mine/various/6100-2/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: southwood</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/the-politics-of-resentment/comment-page-1/#comment-5249607</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[southwood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198059#comment-5249607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks. He thinks he did the UK a great service too !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. He thinks he did the UK a great service too !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/the-politics-of-resentment/comment-page-1/#comment-5249600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CJ Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198059#comment-5249600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post Southwood, spot on. Tony Blair and his actions have left England in grave danger.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Southwood, spot on. Tony Blair and his actions have left England in grave danger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SupremeGalooty</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/the-politics-of-resentment/comment-page-1/#comment-5249435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SupremeGalooty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198059#comment-5249435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Huh? I don&#039;t get your comment. Did we both read the same article?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh? I don&#8217;t get your comment. Did we both read the same article?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flash</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/the-politics-of-resentment/comment-page-1/#comment-5249359</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 04:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198059#comment-5249359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see the connection between Che Guevara and anti-Semitism. The author seems to want us to believe that what he calls &quot;anti-Americanism&quot; is the same thing as anti-Semitism. This is not levelheaded analysis. This is sophistry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see the connection between Che Guevara and anti-Semitism. The author seems to want us to believe that what he calls &#8220;anti-Americanism&#8221; is the same thing as anti-Semitism. This is not levelheaded analysis. This is sophistry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: southwood</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/the-politics-of-resentment/comment-page-1/#comment-5249037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[southwood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198059#comment-5249037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The old democratic Left, the Left of Francois Mitterrand, Paul-Henri Spaak, Tony Blair, and Mario Soares was anti-totalitarian, anti-dictatorial, anti-Soviet, and pro-Israel&quot;

Tony Blair ? I would hesitate to call him democratic in the true sense of the term. This is the guy who created the wonderful utopia ( ? ) that is today&#039;s United Kingdom. He imposed his diverse, politically correct view on the UK. He more than anyone is the icon for those who appreciate the restrictive laws, Islamic invasion and EU hegemony which has destroyed the old tolerant, fair minded Britain many of us fondly remember. I am no fan of George Galloway but he surely got it right when he said that Tony Blair was never a socialist. For a member of the Labour Party in the UK that means he was a fifth 
columnist, or a revolutionary subversive. In fact Blair was never of the
 Labour type Left with their sympathies for the working class. He was/is
 Left in the same way that all so-called liberals are of the Left. In 
other words a Marcuse type Leftist. What Blair founded in Britain, what 
we have now in Britain, is a liberal dictatorship. We got what Tony 
Blair wanted not what the people who wanted to retain the old British 
values wanted. But people voted for him and his party in droves. Labour remained in power until people began to see what its fruits were: huge intrusive immigration and so called equality legislation which left some sections of the community marginalized. Blair&#039;s heir, Brown, in fact stated that 
Islam, and other minority religions were to be given favoured treatment 
over Christianity. That is on record. Shariah ? Just a variation on the 
Golden Rule, eh ? Eventually people had had enough and voted Labour out.
 However by this time the damage had been done. So much so that the Conservative Party changed dramatically as a result. The Conservative Party 
which had been moving somewhat to the left just when Blair gained power,
 saw themselves losing three elections in a row. The future looked bleak for the Tories. Their image men got to work. The Tories gradually began to conform more and more to the new social viewpoints. They adopted the same PC policies. They got a smooth looking, smooth talker as their front man, i.e. Cameron;  just like Blair been for Labour. Cameron is the most compromising leader the Tories have had since Chamberlain. 



As for Blair being &quot;pro-israel&quot;, well, explain how it is that his wife saw fit to empathize with Palestinian suicide bombers. Mmm... 


Tony Blair is for us British conservatives what Obama is for American conservatives.There are definite similarities between the Blair situation and that which faces America under Obama.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The old democratic Left, the Left of Francois Mitterrand, Paul-Henri Spaak, Tony Blair, and Mario Soares was anti-totalitarian, anti-dictatorial, anti-Soviet, and pro-Israel&#8221;</p>
<p>Tony Blair ? I would hesitate to call him democratic in the true sense of the term. This is the guy who created the wonderful utopia ( ? ) that is today&#8217;s United Kingdom. He imposed his diverse, politically correct view on the UK. He more than anyone is the icon for those who appreciate the restrictive laws, Islamic invasion and EU hegemony which has destroyed the old tolerant, fair minded Britain many of us fondly remember. I am no fan of George Galloway but he surely got it right when he said that Tony Blair was never a socialist. For a member of the Labour Party in the UK that means he was a fifth<br />
columnist, or a revolutionary subversive. In fact Blair was never of the<br />
 Labour type Left with their sympathies for the working class. He was/is<br />
 Left in the same way that all so-called liberals are of the Left. In<br />
other words a Marcuse type Leftist. What Blair founded in Britain, what<br />
we have now in Britain, is a liberal dictatorship. We got what Tony<br />
Blair wanted not what the people who wanted to retain the old British<br />
values wanted. But people voted for him and his party in droves. Labour remained in power until people began to see what its fruits were: huge intrusive immigration and so called equality legislation which left some sections of the community marginalized. Blair&#8217;s heir, Brown, in fact stated that<br />
Islam, and other minority religions were to be given favoured treatment<br />
over Christianity. That is on record. Shariah ? Just a variation on the<br />
Golden Rule, eh ? Eventually people had had enough and voted Labour out.<br />
 However by this time the damage had been done. So much so that the Conservative Party changed dramatically as a result. The Conservative Party<br />
which had been moving somewhat to the left just when Blair gained power,<br />
 saw themselves losing three elections in a row. The future looked bleak for the Tories. Their image men got to work. The Tories gradually began to conform more and more to the new social viewpoints. They adopted the same PC policies. They got a smooth looking, smooth talker as their front man, i.e. Cameron;  just like Blair been for Labour. Cameron is the most compromising leader the Tories have had since Chamberlain. </p>
<p>As for Blair being &#8220;pro-israel&#8221;, well, explain how it is that his wife saw fit to empathize with Palestinian suicide bombers. Mmm&#8230; </p>
<p>Tony Blair is for us British conservatives what Obama is for American conservatives.There are definite similarities between the Blair situation and that which faces America under Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/vladimir-tismaneanu/the-politics-of-resentment/comment-page-1/#comment-5249000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 08:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198059#comment-5249000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.garethjones.org/soviet_articles/soviet_articles.htm

...in early March 1933, after an &#039;off-limits&#039; walking tour of the Soviet Ukraine, Gareth, a young man of just 27 years, exposed to the world the terrible famine-genocide that had befallen the Soviet Union and gave reasons for this tragic state of events. It was in the same week that Malcolm Muggeridge had three unsigned famine articles in the Manchester Guardian published, though at the time, due to the more reported Jewish problems in Germany , they went almost unnoticed. Gareth&#039;s story however, broke world-wide with much credence (by virtue of his position with Lloyd George) from a Berlin press interview on the 29th March 1933, and was published in the USA as &#039;exclusives&#039; on the same day by Pulitzer prize winners; H. R Knickerbocker (1931) and Edgar Adsel Mowrer (1933).. 

Even though Gareth revealed the truth, he was publicly denounced as a liar by several Moscow resident Western journalists, including The New York Times&#039; and incumbent 1932 Pulitzer Prize Winner, Walter Duranty. In 1937, Eugene Lyons, a Moscow based correspondent, who repudiated Gareth four years earlier, was apologetic for his actions in his book Assignment in Utopia:

&quot;Throwing down Jones was as unpleasant a chore as fell to any of us in years of juggling facts to please dictatorial regimes—but throw him down we did, unanimously and in almost identical formulas of equivocation. Poor Gareth Jones must have been the most surprised human being alive when the facts he so painstakingly garnered from our mouths were snowed under by our denials.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.garethjones.org/soviet_articles/soviet_articles.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.garethjones.org/soviet_articles/soviet_articles.htm</a></p>
<p>&#8230;in early March 1933, after an &#8216;off-limits&#8217; walking tour of the Soviet Ukraine, Gareth, a young man of just 27 years, exposed to the world the terrible famine-genocide that had befallen the Soviet Union and gave reasons for this tragic state of events. It was in the same week that Malcolm Muggeridge had three unsigned famine articles in the Manchester Guardian published, though at the time, due to the more reported Jewish problems in Germany , they went almost unnoticed. Gareth&#8217;s story however, broke world-wide with much credence (by virtue of his position with Lloyd George) from a Berlin press interview on the 29th March 1933, and was published in the USA as &#8216;exclusives&#8217; on the same day by Pulitzer prize winners; H. R Knickerbocker (1931) and Edgar Adsel Mowrer (1933).. </p>
<p>Even though Gareth revealed the truth, he was publicly denounced as a liar by several Moscow resident Western journalists, including The New York Times&#8217; and incumbent 1932 Pulitzer Prize Winner, Walter Duranty. In 1937, Eugene Lyons, a Moscow based correspondent, who repudiated Gareth four years earlier, was apologetic for his actions in his book Assignment in Utopia:</p>
<p>&#8220;Throwing down Jones was as unpleasant a chore as fell to any of us in years of juggling facts to please dictatorial regimes—but throw him down we did, unanimously and in almost identical formulas of equivocation. Poor Gareth Jones must have been the most surprised human being alive when the facts he so painstakingly garnered from our mouths were snowed under by our denials.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 430/439 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 12:00:07 by W3 Total Cache -->