<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meet the &#8220;1%&#8221; Funding Anti-Fracking Hysteria</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/volpe/meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/volpe/meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan_McFarlane</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/volpe/meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria/comment-page-1/#comment-5248707</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duncan_McFarlane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172851#comment-5248707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I told you those blog posts contain links to the original scientific studies. Here are some direct links to some of them in scientific journals
http://www.pnas.org/content/108/20/8172.short
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222989/
And the 1987 EPA study held back for 30 years by oil and gas company lawyers
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/us/drilling-down-documents-7.html?_r=0

The pro-fracking lobby has far more influence over scientific studies on fracking than the anti-fracking campaigners do as the fracking companies donate big money to universities and have commissioned some of the studies through their front group &#039;The Marcellus Shale Coalition&#039;.

e.g The Energy Institute of the University of Texas has received at least $1.5 million from ConocoPhillips alone
http://giving.utexas.edu/2010/11/01/conocophillips-energy-research/
ConocoPhillips is facing legal action over the effects of its fracking activities
http://breakinglawsuitnews.com/lawsuit-filed-against-conocophillips-for-alleged-fracking-related-water-contamination/

This is why many of the studies play semantics by claiming in the summary and conclusions that &quot;fracking&quot; or &quot;hydraulic fracturing&quot; does not cause water pollution while simultaneously stating, if you read the entire study, that every other part of the process does from spills during transport of fracking chemicals to drilling the well and breaches in well casings after fracking. The contamination comes from both fracking chemicals and toxic materials trapped in the shale that are released from it by drilling 
http://ecocentric.blogs.time.com/2012/02/17/shale-gas-its-not-the-fracking-that-might-be-the-problem-its-everything-else/#ixzz1pKQpiwwM

http://energy.utexas.edu/images/ei_shale_gas_regulation120215.pdf

No-one is opposing every single form of energy - there are wind turbines, solar power, wave power, tidal power among other technologies to invest in the development of. Even nuclear, as bad as it is, is less bad than fracking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I told you those blog posts contain links to the original scientific studies. Here are some direct links to some of them in scientific journals<br />
<a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/108/20/8172.short" rel="nofollow">http://www.pnas.org/content/108/20/8172.short</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222989/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222989/</a><br />
And the 1987 EPA study held back for 30 years by oil and gas company lawyers<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/us/drilling-down-documents-7.html?_r=0" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/us/drilling-down-documents-7.html?_r=0</a></p>
<p>The pro-fracking lobby has far more influence over scientific studies on fracking than the anti-fracking campaigners do as the fracking companies donate big money to universities and have commissioned some of the studies through their front group &#8216;The Marcellus Shale Coalition&#8217;.</p>
<p>e.g The Energy Institute of the University of Texas has received at least $1.5 million from ConocoPhillips alone<br />
<a href="http://giving.utexas.edu/2010/11/01/conocophillips-energy-research/" rel="nofollow">http://giving.utexas.edu/2010/11/01/conocophillips-energy-research/</a><br />
ConocoPhillips is facing legal action over the effects of its fracking activities<br />
<a href="http://breakinglawsuitnews.com/lawsuit-filed-against-conocophillips-for-alleged-fracking-related-water-contamination/" rel="nofollow">http://breakinglawsuitnews.com/lawsuit-filed-against-conocophillips-for-alleged-fracking-related-water-contamination/</a></p>
<p>This is why many of the studies play semantics by claiming in the summary and conclusions that &#8220;fracking&#8221; or &#8220;hydraulic fracturing&#8221; does not cause water pollution while simultaneously stating, if you read the entire study, that every other part of the process does from spills during transport of fracking chemicals to drilling the well and breaches in well casings after fracking. The contamination comes from both fracking chemicals and toxic materials trapped in the shale that are released from it by drilling<br />
<a href="http://ecocentric.blogs.time.com/2012/02/17/shale-gas-its-not-the-fracking-that-might-be-the-problem-its-everything-else/#ixzz1pKQpiwwM" rel="nofollow">http://ecocentric.blogs.time.com/2012/02/17/shale-gas-its-not-the-fracking-that-might-be-the-problem-its-everything-else/#ixzz1pKQpiwwM</a></p>
<p><a href="http://energy.utexas.edu/images/ei_shale_gas_regulation120215.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://energy.utexas.edu/images/ei_shale_gas_regulation120215.pdf</a></p>
<p>No-one is opposing every single form of energy &#8211; there are wind turbines, solar power, wave power, tidal power among other technologies to invest in the development of. Even nuclear, as bad as it is, is less bad than fracking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debek</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/volpe/meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria/comment-page-1/#comment-5248700</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[debek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172851#comment-5248700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[typical anti-fracking hysteria.  Your reading comprehension needs work. I was simply proposing and idea.  There was not even the implication of fact.

Oh, and as for the science, pointing me to a blog that specifically supports your opinion is not the same as impartial scientific evidence.



Sadly, it is incredibly difficult to find impartial science regarding this issue.  The pro&#039;s &amp; the con&#039;s are both equally guilty of spinning articles to their own agenda.  I have an equal amount of low regard for both sides.


And frankly, I don&#039;t see where opposing every single form of energy is a workable solution to energy needs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>typical anti-fracking hysteria.  Your reading comprehension needs work. I was simply proposing and idea.  There was not even the implication of fact.</p>
<p>Oh, and as for the science, pointing me to a blog that specifically supports your opinion is not the same as impartial scientific evidence.</p>
<p>Sadly, it is incredibly difficult to find impartial science regarding this issue.  The pro&#8217;s &amp; the con&#8217;s are both equally guilty of spinning articles to their own agenda.  I have an equal amount of low regard for both sides.</p>
<p>And frankly, I don&#8217;t see where opposing every single form of energy is a workable solution to energy needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan_McFarlane</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/volpe/meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria/comment-page-1/#comment-5248354</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duncan_McFarlane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172851#comment-5248354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[oh and on the science - it does support their stand - see my blog post links below - they include links to multiple scientific studies

http://inplaceoffear.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/fracking-insane-scientific-evidence.html

http://inplaceoffear.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/texas-study-actually-shows-fracking.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh and on the science &#8211; it does support their stand &#8211; see my blog post links below &#8211; they include links to multiple scientific studies</p>
<p><a href="http://inplaceoffear.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/fracking-insane-scientific-evidence.html" rel="nofollow">http://inplaceoffear.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/fracking-insane-scientific-evidence.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://inplaceoffear.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/texas-study-actually-shows-fracking.html" rel="nofollow">http://inplaceoffear.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/texas-study-actually-shows-fracking.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan_McFarlane</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/volpe/meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria/comment-page-1/#comment-5248338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duncan_McFarlane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172851#comment-5248338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right, where&#039;s your evidence then that any anti-fracking campaigner, even one of them, has invested in arms companies?
You can propose anything, even that the anti-fracking campaigners are actually evil lizard people from space, but why should anyone take your proposal seriously if there&#039;s no evidence of it, at all?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, where&#8217;s your evidence then that any anti-fracking campaigner, even one of them, has invested in arms companies?<br />
You can propose anything, even that the anti-fracking campaigners are actually evil lizard people from space, but why should anyone take your proposal seriously if there&#8217;s no evidence of it, at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debek</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/volpe/meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria/comment-page-1/#comment-5248317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[debek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172851#comment-5248317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do you know that the anti-fracking campaigners have no financial reason for opposing it?  Perhaps their retirement portfolios are held up by overseas oil and energy and/or companies whose profits come from supporting war?  Certainly they realize that if American can not be self-reliant on it&#039;s own energy sources that we will continue to become involved in wars and conflicts overseas that are related to energy sources.  War = $.  $ from manufacturing uniforms, tanks, missiles, guns.  $ from supplying civilian contractors to rebuild schools and hospitals.  Lockheed, Haliburton, CACI International, Goodrich, DynCorp, Hewlett Packard, ManTech, General Electric, to name just a few.  


I propose that the anti-fracking rebels are simply protecting their retirement portfolios.


Since the science does not support their stand, it&#039;s the only other reason I can come up with that makes any sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you know that the anti-fracking campaigners have no financial reason for opposing it?  Perhaps their retirement portfolios are held up by overseas oil and energy and/or companies whose profits come from supporting war?  Certainly they realize that if American can not be self-reliant on it&#8217;s own energy sources that we will continue to become involved in wars and conflicts overseas that are related to energy sources.  War = $.  $ from manufacturing uniforms, tanks, missiles, guns.  $ from supplying civilian contractors to rebuild schools and hospitals.  Lockheed, Haliburton, CACI International, Goodrich, DynCorp, Hewlett Packard, ManTech, General Electric, to name just a few.  </p>
<p>I propose that the anti-fracking rebels are simply protecting their retirement portfolios.</p>
<p>Since the science does not support their stand, it&#8217;s the only other reason I can come up with that makes any sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan_McFarlane</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/volpe/meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria/comment-page-1/#comment-5237682</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duncan_McFarlane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172851#comment-5237682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do the anti-fracking campaigners other than the people in these film stand to make a penny from opposing it? No. They&#039;re opposing it because they don&#039;t want their own air and water polluted for a long time for small numbers of fairly short-term jobs, or to defend other people from suffering that.

And do you think films about anti-fracking campaigners are going to bring in big money? Never in a million years. If Matt Damon and the others involved just wanted money they&#039;d be making Terminator or Batman number whatever.

On the other hand the Marcellus Shale Coalition - an association of the companies involved in fracking in the US - has set up &#039;Energy In Depth&#039; as a front group to campaign in favour of supposedly &quot;safe&quot; fracking despite multiple EPA and academic studies showing its not safe.

The companies also fund universities including the University of Pittsburgh and Philadelphia - and some of the studies use reports funded the Marcellus Shale Coalition as sources. As a result academic studies often use some of the same semantics to make it sound like fracking is harmless, but if you read carefully what they actually say is that the hydraulic fracturing (pumping water and chemicals under pressure down the shaft) isn&#039;t polluting the ground water or air, but every other part of the process is ; the fracking chemicals are frequently spilled while being transported above ground and then go into water supplies ; the drilling of the well to prepare for fracking releases methane and radioactive materials trapped in the shale ; after fracking the well casing usually degrades within a few month to years resulting in pollution of water and air ; and &quot;flaring&quot; off of gas causes major air pollution. 

For more info and links to the EPA and university studies see my blog posts - links below

http://inplaceoffear.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/fracking-insane-scientific-evidence.html

http://inplaceoffear.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/texas-study-actually-shows-fracking.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do the anti-fracking campaigners other than the people in these film stand to make a penny from opposing it? No. They&#8217;re opposing it because they don&#8217;t want their own air and water polluted for a long time for small numbers of fairly short-term jobs, or to defend other people from suffering that.</p>
<p>And do you think films about anti-fracking campaigners are going to bring in big money? Never in a million years. If Matt Damon and the others involved just wanted money they&#8217;d be making Terminator or Batman number whatever.</p>
<p>On the other hand the Marcellus Shale Coalition &#8211; an association of the companies involved in fracking in the US &#8211; has set up &#8216;Energy In Depth&#8217; as a front group to campaign in favour of supposedly &#8220;safe&#8221; fracking despite multiple EPA and academic studies showing its not safe.</p>
<p>The companies also fund universities including the University of Pittsburgh and Philadelphia &#8211; and some of the studies use reports funded the Marcellus Shale Coalition as sources. As a result academic studies often use some of the same semantics to make it sound like fracking is harmless, but if you read carefully what they actually say is that the hydraulic fracturing (pumping water and chemicals under pressure down the shaft) isn&#8217;t polluting the ground water or air, but every other part of the process is ; the fracking chemicals are frequently spilled while being transported above ground and then go into water supplies ; the drilling of the well to prepare for fracking releases methane and radioactive materials trapped in the shale ; after fracking the well casing usually degrades within a few month to years resulting in pollution of water and air ; and &#8220;flaring&#8221; off of gas causes major air pollution. </p>
<p>For more info and links to the EPA and university studies see my blog posts &#8211; links below</p>
<p><a href="http://inplaceoffear.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/fracking-insane-scientific-evidence.html" rel="nofollow">http://inplaceoffear.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/fracking-insane-scientific-evidence.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://inplaceoffear.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/texas-study-actually-shows-fracking.html" rel="nofollow">http://inplaceoffear.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/texas-study-actually-shows-fracking.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Roden</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/volpe/meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria/comment-page-1/#comment-4212110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Roden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172851#comment-4212110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Grant: 
Do you want the waste water from fracking pumped into spent wells and have them causing earthquakes?  And now the gas industry wants 19 ports converted to export terminals to shiip this gas overseas.  I thought this gas was for US energy independence?  We don&#039;t need this gas for our energy needs. Read the Nov 2009 issue of Scientific American.  We can power the world without fossil fuel or nuclear power by 2030 with existing technology if we have the political will.  The Germans will obtain 80 % of their energy by 2016 from renewable sources and shut down their nuclear plants by 2022.  I know this because I visited there last July 2012.  The Germans are not &quot;starving and freezing in the dark&quot;.  Their economy is growing while they cut their energy use.  Their Chancellor and their Parliment, the Bundestad from left to right, Conservative to Green are united behind this policy. Imagine if our Congress and State government could unite behind such a plan.  If the Germans can do it, we can do it.  Fracking is not safe, it is too expensive and not necessary for our energy needs, just like nuclear power. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Grant:<br />
Do you want the waste water from fracking pumped into spent wells and have them causing earthquakes?  And now the gas industry wants 19 ports converted to export terminals to shiip this gas overseas.  I thought this gas was for US energy independence?  We don&#039;t need this gas for our energy needs. Read the Nov 2009 issue of Scientific American.  We can power the world without fossil fuel or nuclear power by 2030 with existing technology if we have the political will.  The Germans will obtain 80 % of their energy by 2016 from renewable sources and shut down their nuclear plants by 2022.  I know this because I visited there last July 2012.  The Germans are not &quot;starving and freezing in the dark&quot;.  Their economy is growing while they cut their energy use.  Their Chancellor and their Parliment, the Bundestad from left to right, Conservative to Green are united behind this policy. Imagine if our Congress and State government could unite behind such a plan.  If the Germans can do it, we can do it.  Fracking is not safe, it is too expensive and not necessary for our energy needs, just like nuclear power. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Roden</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/volpe/meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria/comment-page-1/#comment-4212102</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Roden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172851#comment-4212102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Grant, have you read the New York Times series drilling down? or the reports on stateimpact.npr.org? Fracking is not safe, it is bad for the environment and for global warming.  Do you want your drinking water destroyed directly or indirectly by the waste water that can&#039;t be treated?  Do you want &quot;well brine pored on your streets for de-icing because it has been reclassified as having &quot;beneficial use&quot;?  Do you want radioactive radon delivered to be burned in your home or apt?  Are you willing to pay for monitoring of spent wells the casings of which only last 100 years at best?  Do you want pipelines and pumping stations in your neighborhood?  Do you want well pads flaring excess gas, running drill rigs and pumping houses 24 hrs a day non stop for 10&#039;s of years?   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Grant, have you read the New York Times series drilling down? or the reports on stateimpact.npr.org? Fracking is not safe, it is bad for the environment and for global warming.  Do you want your drinking water destroyed directly or indirectly by the waste water that can&#039;t be treated?  Do you want &quot;well brine pored on your streets for de-icing because it has been reclassified as having &quot;beneficial use&quot;?  Do you want radioactive radon delivered to be burned in your home or apt?  Are you willing to pay for monitoring of spent wells the casings of which only last 100 years at best?  Do you want pipelines and pumping stations in your neighborhood?  Do you want well pads flaring excess gas, running drill rigs and pumping houses 24 hrs a day non stop for 10&#039;s of years?   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/volpe/meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria/comment-page-1/#comment-4155544</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 06:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172851#comment-4155544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where are your sources for the facts in this article? Some of what I read was very questionable in regards to its legitimacy (i.e.- funding for the movie by the UAE... Do you really believe everything you hear?) I do know it is quietly suggesting that people who preach change are quacks and global warming is simply a fictional tool of state. I am an environmental engineering grad student at the university of Michigan and I can assure you that these are issues that are definitely worth lobbying for. I did an internship for a non-profit that has been monitoring the air and soil quality in varying regions of the U.S. and China; results only continue to prove an everlasting and chilling trend. Call me an environmental idealist all you want; I have the data to prove our &quot;propaganda&quot; is far from fictional. I could present the information to the non believers, but the majority of people cannot understand what&#039;s being introduced. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where are your sources for the facts in this article? Some of what I read was very questionable in regards to its legitimacy (i.e.- funding for the movie by the UAE&#8230; Do you really believe everything you hear?) I do know it is quietly suggesting that people who preach change are quacks and global warming is simply a fictional tool of state. I am an environmental engineering grad student at the university of Michigan and I can assure you that these are issues that are definitely worth lobbying for. I did an internship for a non-profit that has been monitoring the air and soil quality in varying regions of the U.S. and China; results only continue to prove an everlasting and chilling trend. Call me an environmental idealist all you want; I have the data to prove our &quot;propaganda&quot; is far from fictional. I could present the information to the non believers, but the majority of people cannot understand what&#039;s being introduced. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Refracktion</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/volpe/meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria/comment-page-1/#comment-4147812</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Refracktion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172851#comment-4147812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am neither an environmentalist nor a marxist. Just a man with a brain. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am neither an environmentalist nor a marxist. Just a man with a brain. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reader</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/volpe/meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria/comment-page-1/#comment-4146152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[reader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 02:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172851#comment-4146152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not too sophisticated after all - unraveling from a &quot;passionate environmentalist&quot; to a pathetic marxist troll straight away. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not too sophisticated after all &#8211; unraveling from a &quot;passionate environmentalist&quot; to a pathetic marxist troll straight away. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Refracktion</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/volpe/meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria/comment-page-1/#comment-4145547</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Refracktion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 22:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172851#comment-4145547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK - just did LOL   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK &#8211; just did LOL   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Refracktion</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/volpe/meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria/comment-page-1/#comment-4145541</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Refracktion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 22:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172851#comment-4145541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s so funny? Just go buy a mirror and you&#039;ll have the answer in nanoseconds ;-) ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#039;s so funny? Just go buy a mirror and you&#039;ll have the answer in nanoseconds <img src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";-)" class="wp-smiley" />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reader</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/volpe/meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria/comment-page-1/#comment-4145327</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[reader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 21:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172851#comment-4145327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you had to have the last word in, why not just by answering a straightforward and simple enough question below? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you had to have the last word in, why not just by answering a straightforward and simple enough question below? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Refracktion</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/volpe/meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria/comment-page-1/#comment-4143670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Refracktion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 09:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172851#comment-4143670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LOL. Just LOL ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL. Just LOL </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reader</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/volpe/meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria/comment-page-1/#comment-4143032</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[reader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 03:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172851#comment-4143032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[particularly sad case ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>particularly sad case </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reader</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/volpe/meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria/comment-page-1/#comment-4141715</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[reader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 19:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172851#comment-4141715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny again, but, seriously, who&#039;d you vote for? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny again, but, seriously, who&#039;d you vote for? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Refracktion</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/volpe/meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria/comment-page-1/#comment-4141505</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Refracktion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 17:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172851#comment-4141505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[but I can&#039;t and I shan&#039;t 
 
You are starting to sound like a paranoid version of Dr Seuss ;-) ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but I can&#039;t and I shan&#039;t </p>
<p>You are starting to sound like a paranoid version of Dr Seuss <img src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";-)" class="wp-smiley" />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reader</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/volpe/meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria/comment-page-1/#comment-4141468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[reader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 17:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172851#comment-4141468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if you could. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you could. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reader</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/volpe/meet-the-1-behind-the-anti-fracking-hysteria/comment-page-1/#comment-4141465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[reader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 17:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=172851#comment-4141465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you can&#039;t, I&#039;m sure you would. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can&#039;t, I&#039;m sure you would. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 841/948 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 07:45:03 by W3 Total Cache -->