<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Kerry&#8217;s Jewish Best Friends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 10:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: danshanteal</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-5411706</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[danshanteal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2014 17:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224399#comment-5411706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Kerry&#039;s mother wears combat boots. Dizzy Livni is an old lady. Bibi baby  is slow as molasses. Psaki is a sad sack. Caroine is a sweetheart. Words alone won&#039;t get us where we want to be. Just read Max Fankel&#039;s memoir. Try it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Kerry&#8217;s mother wears combat boots. Dizzy Livni is an old lady. Bibi baby  is slow as molasses. Psaki is a sad sack. Caroine is a sweetheart. Words alone won&#8217;t get us where we want to be. Just read Max Fankel&#8217;s memoir. Try it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ahad_ha_amoratsim</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-5407141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ahad_ha_amoratsim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224399#comment-5407141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In theory, you&#039;re right. In practicve, putting someon in cherem is not very effective when the majority of US Jews don&#039;t much care what the Torah authorities have to say. In Spinoza&#039;s day, the majority of the Jewish world cared whether someone had been kicked out. And unlike now, a Jew who was kicked out but did not want to convert to another religion had no options.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In theory, you&#8217;re right. In practicve, putting someon in cherem is not very effective when the majority of US Jews don&#8217;t much care what the Torah authorities have to say. In Spinoza&#8217;s day, the majority of the Jewish world cared whether someone had been kicked out. And unlike now, a Jew who was kicked out but did not want to convert to another religion had no options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Habbgun</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-5407128</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Habbgun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224399#comment-5407128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes I agree with the Torah too. The inclusiveness of these organizations extends to those who don&#039;t meet the Torah standard. They need to be reminded that they should. We know the less a person is affiliated with Judaism the more likely they are to be a J-Streeter type so acknowledging that fact is important. It is also important to recognize that Torah Judaism extends to Jews without the European background that liberal Jews love so much. Inclusiveness should include recognizing the experiences of Jews from Moslem countries who clearly and fully follow the Torah and make that a factor in how we view Israel. I have far more respect for the Sephardic Jew who follows the Torah than the J-Streeter who doesn&#039;t and that is how it should be. The J-Streeter just cares that his Leftist and European heroes don&#039;t like Israel. That is not enough to have a voice in Jewish affairs. It simply isn&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I agree with the Torah too. The inclusiveness of these organizations extends to those who don&#8217;t meet the Torah standard. They need to be reminded that they should. We know the less a person is affiliated with Judaism the more likely they are to be a J-Streeter type so acknowledging that fact is important. It is also important to recognize that Torah Judaism extends to Jews without the European background that liberal Jews love so much. Inclusiveness should include recognizing the experiences of Jews from Moslem countries who clearly and fully follow the Torah and make that a factor in how we view Israel. I have far more respect for the Sephardic Jew who follows the Torah than the J-Streeter who doesn&#8217;t and that is how it should be. The J-Streeter just cares that his Leftist and European heroes don&#8217;t like Israel. That is not enough to have a voice in Jewish affairs. It simply isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Habbgun</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-5407120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Habbgun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224399#comment-5407120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are asking the wrong guy. I&#039;m just a commenter. Maybe you can email FPM or the Conference itself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are asking the wrong guy. I&#8217;m just a commenter. Maybe you can email FPM or the Conference itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hard Little Machine</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-5407111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hard Little Machine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224399#comment-5407111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[no we&#039;re not. It you want to go the legalistic route treat them the same as Spinoza, literally kick them out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no we&#8217;re not. It you want to go the legalistic route treat them the same as Spinoza, literally kick them out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ahad_ha_amoratsim</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-5407104</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ahad_ha_amoratsim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224399#comment-5407104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was pleased that 22 members of Conference of Presidents voted to reject J Street&#039;s application. And maybe I&#039;m naive, but I was shocked that 17 members voted to admit them. Is there any place I can find a list of those 17? I&#039;m betting that none of them get any donations from me now, but I want to make sure that none of them do in the future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was pleased that 22 members of Conference of Presidents voted to reject J Street&#8217;s application. And maybe I&#8217;m naive, but I was shocked that 17 members voted to admit them. Is there any place I can find a list of those 17? I&#8217;m betting that none of them get any donations from me now, but I want to make sure that none of them do in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ahad_ha_amoratsim</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-5407103</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ahad_ha_amoratsim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224399#comment-5407103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, but reality is that there is only one way to define who is a Jew, and that is according to Torah. Which means that it does not matter whether they side with the enemy, whether they reject Torah, or how they vote -- Jewish mother or valid conversion =Jew, and we&#039;re stuck with them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but reality is that there is only one way to define who is a Jew, and that is according to Torah. Which means that it does not matter whether they side with the enemy, whether they reject Torah, or how they vote &#8212; Jewish mother or valid conversion =Jew, and we&#8217;re stuck with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ahad_ha_amoratsim</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-5407102</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ahad_ha_amoratsim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224399#comment-5407102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And how did Rome get there to begin with? Because of fights between different branches of the chashmonaim.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And how did Rome get there to begin with? Because of fights between different branches of the chashmonaim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lostlegends</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-5406830</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lostlegends]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 04:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224399#comment-5406830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is nothing new in this madness. Jews have fought with Jews since whenever. With the Romans outside the walls, inside they had a three way civil war. So Rome won. Same old, same old.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing new in this madness. Jews have fought with Jews since whenever. With the Romans outside the walls, inside they had a three way civil war. So Rome won. Same old, same old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCREW SOCIALISM</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-5406809</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SCREW SOCIALISM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 02:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224399#comment-5406809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad&quot;


Kerry is Nuts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad&#8221;</p>
<p>Kerry is Nuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-5406791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 01:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224399#comment-5406791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kerry&#039;s use of &quot;apartheid&quot; sealed the tomb of the peace process. Almost immediately after he said it, Fatah and Hamas united. Coincidence? I doubt it. Kerry had just licensed jihad on Israel for being an apartheid state. He gave the Muslims a US endorsed moral grounds for escalating their genocidal apartheid agenda.


Muslims live by delusion, so the merest hint from an American Secretary of State that Israel is verging on apartheid will be treated as verified fact. Kerry has failed miserably at bringing peace... if that was indeed his goal. His statements and actions evince nothing that suggests peace was his ever his true objective.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kerry&#8217;s use of &#8220;apartheid&#8221; sealed the tomb of the peace process. Almost immediately after he said it, Fatah and Hamas united. Coincidence? I doubt it. Kerry had just licensed jihad on Israel for being an apartheid state. He gave the Muslims a US endorsed moral grounds for escalating their genocidal apartheid agenda.</p>
<p>Muslims live by delusion, so the merest hint from an American Secretary of State that Israel is verging on apartheid will be treated as verified fact. Kerry has failed miserably at bringing peace&#8230; if that was indeed his goal. His statements and actions evince nothing that suggests peace was his ever his true objective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wileyvet</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-5406734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wileyvet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224399#comment-5406734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All funding to the PLO, and yes they are still the same terrorist organization they have always been regardless of what they wish to call themselves, needs to be cut off. Their claim to Jerusalem is based on the ludicrous assertion of Muhammad magically appearing there during his so called Night Flight, on a mystical and mythical animal called a Burraq, a winged animal with a womans face by some accounts, half donkey half mule by others. While there he met all the past prophets, climbed the seven heavens and met with Allah while claiming he did so from a point of departure of the Temple of Solomon, which of course is impossible since it was destroyed 1000 years earlier. The total fabrication by Muhammad was to give an alibi for his whereabouts when his companions could not find him. And where was he you ask? Sleeping with a female cousin in her house, contrary to Pagan custom of the time which would have been highly embarrassing for him and would have exposed him to harassment, ridicule and scorn from the Quraysh of Mecca.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All funding to the PLO, and yes they are still the same terrorist organization they have always been regardless of what they wish to call themselves, needs to be cut off. Their claim to Jerusalem is based on the ludicrous assertion of Muhammad magically appearing there during his so called Night Flight, on a mystical and mythical animal called a Burraq, a winged animal with a womans face by some accounts, half donkey half mule by others. While there he met all the past prophets, climbed the seven heavens and met with Allah while claiming he did so from a point of departure of the Temple of Solomon, which of course is impossible since it was destroyed 1000 years earlier. The total fabrication by Muhammad was to give an alibi for his whereabouts when his companions could not find him. And where was he you ask? Sleeping with a female cousin in her house, contrary to Pagan custom of the time which would have been highly embarrassing for him and would have exposed him to harassment, ridicule and scorn from the Quraysh of Mecca.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve b</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-5406651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve b]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224399#comment-5406651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YEAH, LIKE, &quot;SOME OF MY BEST FRIENDS ARE BLACK!&quot;  KERRY SHOULD BE BANNED FOR LIFE FROM ANY CONTACT WITH GOVERNMENT AND FORCED TO SELL HIS OWNERSHIP OF IT.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YEAH, LIKE, &#8220;SOME OF MY BEST FRIENDS ARE BLACK!&#8221;  KERRY SHOULD BE BANNED FOR LIFE FROM ANY CONTACT WITH GOVERNMENT AND FORCED TO SELL HIS OWNERSHIP OF IT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoCalMike</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-5406630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SoCalMike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224399#comment-5406630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only Apartheid State in the picture here is the one Kerry and Obama are trying to build. Obama, Kerry and the State Dept already agreed that the future Palestinian state will be judenrein or devoid of Jewish people. 
What&#039;s more embarrassing? 
That the Palestinians demanded it or that Americans like Obama and Kerry and Hillary are all on board and down with that??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only Apartheid State in the picture here is the one Kerry and Obama are trying to build. Obama, Kerry and the State Dept already agreed that the future Palestinian state will be judenrein or devoid of Jewish people.<br />
What&#8217;s more embarrassing?<br />
That the Palestinians demanded it or that Americans like Obama and Kerry and Hillary are all on board and down with that??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Habbgun</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-5406581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Habbgun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224399#comment-5406581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No hope that these &quot;Jewish leaders&quot; will reject J-Street and its ilk. Even a negative vote would mean subsequent &quot;outreach&quot; and literature sympathetic to J-Street. They are inclusive to every group except any Jewish group that gets dubbed &quot;right wing&quot;. These groups have always responded with &quot;dialogue&quot; to the most ridiculous outliers in society.  Think about the trolls who come here. They have been conditioned by these 
groups. They know whatever they say Jews are for some reason supposed to
 carry on a dialogue. That is the great work of the so-called Jewish leadership. They have never once shown they have any real affinity with being real Jewish leaders.  I can&#039;t name one and am no worse off for it.They represent whomever pays them. They say what they are told to say.

Their claim to importance is who they meet among politicians, etc. They don&#039;t get to meet anyone if they don&#039;t show they are malleable to whatever they are told to do. 

To believe that they will reject a group beloved by the President is to believe in a fortitude and integrity they have never, ever, had. If someone in power Jewish or not wants it the so-called Jewish leadership will endorse it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No hope that these &#8220;Jewish leaders&#8221; will reject J-Street and its ilk. Even a negative vote would mean subsequent &#8220;outreach&#8221; and literature sympathetic to J-Street. They are inclusive to every group except any Jewish group that gets dubbed &#8220;right wing&#8221;. These groups have always responded with &#8220;dialogue&#8221; to the most ridiculous outliers in society.  Think about the trolls who come here. They have been conditioned by these<br />
groups. They know whatever they say Jews are for some reason supposed to<br />
 carry on a dialogue. That is the great work of the so-called Jewish leadership. They have never once shown they have any real affinity with being real Jewish leaders.  I can&#8217;t name one and am no worse off for it.They represent whomever pays them. They say what they are told to say.</p>
<p>Their claim to importance is who they meet among politicians, etc. They don&#8217;t get to meet anyone if they don&#8217;t show they are malleable to whatever they are told to do. </p>
<p>To believe that they will reject a group beloved by the President is to believe in a fortitude and integrity they have never, ever, had. If someone in power Jewish or not wants it the so-called Jewish leadership will endorse it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retired</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-5406537</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[retired]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224399#comment-5406537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The commenter below by the name of Anukem Jihadi got it right on the money!
 He is correct because his ideas are conceptual &amp; outside of the box,that&#039;s where the basic truth lies.There is what some may call the &quot;Shadow State&quot;,Statists,One World Order &amp; etc.,etc..The politicos are merely the puppets who front for these Statists.When Kerry reports his views to the Rockefeller owned forum,the Trilateral Commission,he is reporting to his real bosses,the statist oligarchs!
  Why is this prefabricated &amp; make believe issue, the Israel/Arab peace process so important to Rockefeller &amp; his One World Order oligarchs? The answer is that they want to destroy Israel &amp; the Jews!Why should this be so?It is so because Judaism, the Jews,&amp; a strong Israel are a philosophical threat to their elite life style.These feelings are even more pronounced in Brussels (EU).This is why the Europeans  organized the Ghettos.This was done by the ruling elites of the times to keep Jewish ideas away from the underclasses who slaved away for the Aristocrats &amp; High Clergy.In actuality the conflict was between a society which was subject to &quot;The Law&quot;,no matter who you are,as opposed to European societies which were ruled by Great Men,who were above the law!
 The Jews are a particularist nation that can&#039;t be squeezed into a One World Order &amp; so must be removed (Along with the American People).This is why the powers behind the scenes,in Washington &amp; Brussels,are pushing their political puppets so hard in pursuit of an otherwise meaningless &amp; trivial(on a global scale) goal! 


 P.S.If I wanted to really get imaginative I would say that the difference between the Jews &amp; the Anti-Semites in the western world is the same as the difference between gold &amp; fiat paper money,created out of thin air,by Central Bankers.These paper Dollars cannot have value among people who trust in gold!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The commenter below by the name of Anukem Jihadi got it right on the money!<br />
 He is correct because his ideas are conceptual &amp; outside of the box,that&#8217;s where the basic truth lies.There is what some may call the &#8220;Shadow State&#8221;,Statists,One World Order &amp; etc.,etc..The politicos are merely the puppets who front for these Statists.When Kerry reports his views to the Rockefeller owned forum,the Trilateral Commission,he is reporting to his real bosses,the statist oligarchs!<br />
  Why is this prefabricated &amp; make believe issue, the Israel/Arab peace process so important to Rockefeller &amp; his One World Order oligarchs? The answer is that they want to destroy Israel &amp; the Jews!Why should this be so?It is so because Judaism, the Jews,&amp; a strong Israel are a philosophical threat to their elite life style.These feelings are even more pronounced in Brussels (EU).This is why the Europeans  organized the Ghettos.This was done by the ruling elites of the times to keep Jewish ideas away from the underclasses who slaved away for the Aristocrats &amp; High Clergy.In actuality the conflict was between a society which was subject to &#8220;The Law&#8221;,no matter who you are,as opposed to European societies which were ruled by Great Men,who were above the law!<br />
 The Jews are a particularist nation that can&#8217;t be squeezed into a One World Order &amp; so must be removed (Along with the American People).This is why the powers behind the scenes,in Washington &amp; Brussels,are pushing their political puppets so hard in pursuit of an otherwise meaningless &amp; trivial(on a global scale) goal! </p>
<p> P.S.If I wanted to really get imaginative I would say that the difference between the Jews &amp; the Anti-Semites in the western world is the same as the difference between gold &amp; fiat paper money,created out of thin air,by Central Bankers.These paper Dollars cannot have value among people who trust in gold!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Kelso</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-5406527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Kelso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224399#comment-5406527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Street stands for Jihad Street.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J Street stands for Jihad Street.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Kelso</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-5406507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Kelso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224399#comment-5406507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now look what Indyk is trying to do.  Do these IDF generals know how radical Indyk is?

http://israelmatzav.blogspot.com/2014/01/indyk-orchestrating-campaign-of-former.html#links 
Indyk orchestrating campaign of former generals to &#039;convince&#039; Israel it can give up Jordan Valley
 January 16, 2014]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now look what Indyk is trying to do.  Do these IDF generals know how radical Indyk is?</p>
<p><a href="http://israelmatzav.blogspot.com/2014/01/indyk-orchestrating-campaign-of-former.html#links" rel="nofollow">http://israelmatzav.blogspot.com/2014/01/indyk-orchestrating-campaign-of-former.html#links</a><br />
Indyk orchestrating campaign of former generals to &#8216;convince&#8217; Israel it can give up Jordan Valley<br />
 January 16, 2014</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Kelso</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-5406506</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Kelso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224399#comment-5406506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Bedein wrote this great article about Indyk documenting how he tries to force Israel to give away half of Jerusalem and how indyk did everything to appease Arafat&#039;s terror war against Israeli civilians.




http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/martin-indyk-the-objective-mediator/
MARTIN INDYK: THE “OBJECTIVE MEDIATOR” ?
DAVID BEDEIN July 23, 2013, 6:14 am

Martin Indyk, who served two stints as US ambassador to Israel, was reported to be the choice of Secretary of State Kerry to serve as the mediator between Israel and the PLO in negotiations that may soon commence in Washington

Indyk’s record as an objective mediator should be examined.

Indyk is generally looked upon as the man who planned the Oslo process that gave Yassir Arafat and the PLO armed control over most of the Palestinian Arab population.

Read more: MARTIN INDYK: THE “OBJECTIVE MEDIATOR” ? &#124; David Bedein &#124; Ops &amp; Blogs &#124; The Times of Israel http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/martin-indyk-the-objective-mediator/#ixzz30NC1FyFB 
Follow us: @timesofisrael on Twitter &#124; timesofisrael on Facebook

In 1994, journalist Haim Shibi of the Yediot Aharonot newspaper reported that in 1987, Indyk had convinced more than 150 members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment that Israel should unilaterally withdraw from territories gained in 1967 Six Day War.

Indyk oversaw every step of the Oslo process with that precise policy in mind – Israel giving up land that is vital to her defense.

Indyk, during  his stint as  US ambassador to Israel. did not hesitate to misrepresent the intentions and policies of the PLO while doing so, obfuscating the fact that the PLO  never adhered to the basic commitment it made to cancel its covenant that calls for the eradication of the Jewish state.

In September 1995, with the signing of the second Olso interim agreement at the White House, the U.S. Congress mandated that the U.S. would only be able to provide funds to the Palestinian Authority and provide diplomatic status to Arafat if the PLO covenant was finally canceled.

The PLO never did so,  yet the foreign aid money kept rolling in to the Palestinian Authority.

On April 24, 1996, the PLO convened a special session of its Palestine National Council (PNC) to consider the subject of the PLO covenant cancellation.

Our news agency dispatched a Palestinian TV crew to cover that session, which turned out to be the only crew that filmed the event.

The film crew brought back a videotape that showed a lively discussion, the conclusion of which was to ratify Arafat’s suggestion that the PNC simply create a committee to “discuss” the subject.

At my own expense, I rushed the VHS copy to Ambassador Indyk for comment, but he did not respond to that request for comment.

Instead, he chose to ignore the decision of the PNC and, in moment of perjury. issued a falsified report to President Clinton and to the U.S. Congress that the PLO covenant had been canceled.

As a result of Indyk’s false report,  Arafat was provided with a red carpet greeting at the White House on May 1, 1996, and the PLO was only then allowed to open an office in Washington.

The next day, however, Hebrew University Professor Yehoshua Porat, a former leader in Peace Now who ran on slot 13 on the Meretz ticket in 1992,an expert in Palestinian studies and fluent in Arabic, convened a press conference in which he shared protocols of the PNC session and the videotape which  proved Arafat never canceled the PLO covenant.

But the damage was already done. Thanks to the obfuscations of Martin Indyk, Arafat and the PLO received United States diplomatic recognition and foreign aid from the U.S., which continues to this day.

In December 1998, President Clinton, finally convinced that Indyk’s 1996 covenant report was  wrong, arrived in Gaza, accompanied by Indyk, where they asked for a show of hands from members of the PNC as to whether they want to cancel the PLO covenant and make peace with Israel. The real answer, however, they got the next day.  Arafat’s personal spokesman, Yassir Abed Abbo, told the media that the PNC had, of course, not canceled any covenant.

Yet there is more.

In September, 2000, Dr. Uzi Landau, now a senior minister in the Israeli government, who  served then as the head of the Knesset State Control Committee (the equivalent of the U.S. Senate’s Committee on Governmental Affairs), took the unusual step of filing a formal complaint against United States Ambassador to Israel Martin Indyk.

Landau quoted the September 16, 2000 report in the Guardian of London that “the U.S. Ambassador to Israel yesterday urged Israel to share Jerusalem with the Palestinians.” Mr. Indyk said: “There is no other solution but to share the holy city… ” and Landau also noted that Ambassador Indyk was similarly quoted by the Associated Press, The Jerusalem Post and Ha’aretz.

Landau went on to say that “the timing of the speech and the political context in which it was delivered leave no room for doubt that Ambassador Indyk was calling on the Government of Israel to divide Jerusalem. Indeed, the Guardian correspondent described the remarks as ‘a sharp departure from Washington orthodoxy in recent years.’”

In addition to his remarks concerning Jerusalem, Ambassador Indyk offered his views regarding secular-religious tensions in Israel and the role of the Reform and Conservative movements in Judaism. He also intimated his tacit support for Prime Minister Barak’s so-called secular revolution. As a commentator in the liberal daily Ha’aretz, noted: “readers are urged to imagine what the Americans would say if the Israeli ambassador to Washington were to come to a local religious institution and say such things.”

Landau, who has served in a ministerial post in the Israeli government that negotiated sensitive relations between the U.S. and Israel, mentioned in his letter to Clinton that he wished to “strongly protest Ambassador Indyk’s blatant interference in Israel’s internal affairs and democratic process… I am sure you would agree that it is simply unacceptable for a foreign diplomat to involve himself so provocatively in the most sensitive affairs of the country to which he is posted. If a foreign ambassador stationed in the United States were to involve himself in a domestic American policy debate regarding race relations or abortion, the subsequent outcry would not be long in coming… Ambassador Indyk’s remarks about Jerusalem are an affront to Israel, particularly since he made them in the heart of the city that he aspires to divide. By needlessly raising Arab expectations on the Jerusalem issue, rather than moderating them, Ambassador Indyk has caused inestimable damage to the peace process. It is likewise inexplicable that Ambassador Indyk would choose to interject his private religious preferences into the debate over secular-religious tensions in Israel.”

Landau made it a point even more by stating that “this is not the first time that the American Embassy in Israel has interfered in our internal affairs. In February, I wrote to you in the wake of media reports that Embassy officials were lobbying Israeli-Arab leaders regarding a possible referendum on the Golan Heights. My fear is that such interference in Israel’s affairs is rapidly becoming routine.”

Landau concluded his  letter to Clinton with a “request that you recall Ambassador Indyk to the United States.”

Two months later, in early November 2000, Arafat’s Second Intifada terror campaign was getting underway, Indyk was strongly condemning Israel’s military actions against Arafat’s forces. Indyk remarked that what the Israelis had to do was to get Arafat to act against the perpetrators of the violence, such as Hamas, Tanzim gangs and the Islamic Jihad diplomatically. He did not mention that Arafat’s own Force 17 bodyguard, Preventive Security and other Palestinian Authority forces were also responsible for a considerable portion of the violence. Indyk never wanted to hold Arafat responsible when Arafat’s forces carried out terrorist activities.

In late November 2000, when Israel issued a “white paper” on intercepted intelligence from Arafat’s headquarters that showed documentary evidence that Arafat and his mainstream PLO gangs were indeed facilitating the campaign of terror, Indyk made a special trip to Jerusalem to demand that the Israeli government withdraw its report. Indyk had just reported to the U.S. Congress that the Palestinian groups organizing the terror campaign were NOT under Arafat’s control.

Eight months later, on May 21, 2001, in an address to Ben Gurion University, Indyk stuck to his guns and continued to position that Arafat and the PLO were the “U.S. colleagues in the War on Terror by telling Israel”: “What you do is you get Arafat to act against the perpetrators of the violence, Hamas, Tanzim gangs, the Islamic Jihad and you get the Israeli government to hold back the Israeli army while he does so. But that requires a great deal of energy and commitment on Arafat’s part — in very risky circumstances to take on the very angry Palestinian street — and that requires a great deal of restraint and forbearance on the part of the government of Israel.”

Indyk’s admonition to Israel to turn the other cheek when it came to Arafat  became his mantra.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Bedein wrote this great article about Indyk documenting how he tries to force Israel to give away half of Jerusalem and how indyk did everything to appease Arafat&#8217;s terror war against Israeli civilians.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/martin-indyk-the-objective-mediator/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/martin-indyk-the-objective-mediator/</a><br />
MARTIN INDYK: THE “OBJECTIVE MEDIATOR” ?<br />
DAVID BEDEIN July 23, 2013, 6:14 am</p>
<p>Martin Indyk, who served two stints as US ambassador to Israel, was reported to be the choice of Secretary of State Kerry to serve as the mediator between Israel and the PLO in negotiations that may soon commence in Washington</p>
<p>Indyk’s record as an objective mediator should be examined.</p>
<p>Indyk is generally looked upon as the man who planned the Oslo process that gave Yassir Arafat and the PLO armed control over most of the Palestinian Arab population.</p>
<p>Read more: MARTIN INDYK: THE “OBJECTIVE MEDIATOR” ? | David Bedein | Ops &amp; Blogs | The Times of Israel <a href="http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/martin-indyk-the-objective-mediator/#ixzz30NC1FyFB" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/martin-indyk-the-objective-mediator/#ixzz30NC1FyFB</a><br />
Follow us: @timesofisrael on Twitter | timesofisrael on Facebook</p>
<p>In 1994, journalist Haim Shibi of the Yediot Aharonot newspaper reported that in 1987, Indyk had convinced more than 150 members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment that Israel should unilaterally withdraw from territories gained in 1967 Six Day War.</p>
<p>Indyk oversaw every step of the Oslo process with that precise policy in mind – Israel giving up land that is vital to her defense.</p>
<p>Indyk, during  his stint as  US ambassador to Israel. did not hesitate to misrepresent the intentions and policies of the PLO while doing so, obfuscating the fact that the PLO  never adhered to the basic commitment it made to cancel its covenant that calls for the eradication of the Jewish state.</p>
<p>In September 1995, with the signing of the second Olso interim agreement at the White House, the U.S. Congress mandated that the U.S. would only be able to provide funds to the Palestinian Authority and provide diplomatic status to Arafat if the PLO covenant was finally canceled.</p>
<p>The PLO never did so,  yet the foreign aid money kept rolling in to the Palestinian Authority.</p>
<p>On April 24, 1996, the PLO convened a special session of its Palestine National Council (PNC) to consider the subject of the PLO covenant cancellation.</p>
<p>Our news agency dispatched a Palestinian TV crew to cover that session, which turned out to be the only crew that filmed the event.</p>
<p>The film crew brought back a videotape that showed a lively discussion, the conclusion of which was to ratify Arafat’s suggestion that the PNC simply create a committee to “discuss” the subject.</p>
<p>At my own expense, I rushed the VHS copy to Ambassador Indyk for comment, but he did not respond to that request for comment.</p>
<p>Instead, he chose to ignore the decision of the PNC and, in moment of perjury. issued a falsified report to President Clinton and to the U.S. Congress that the PLO covenant had been canceled.</p>
<p>As a result of Indyk’s false report,  Arafat was provided with a red carpet greeting at the White House on May 1, 1996, and the PLO was only then allowed to open an office in Washington.</p>
<p>The next day, however, Hebrew University Professor Yehoshua Porat, a former leader in Peace Now who ran on slot 13 on the Meretz ticket in 1992,an expert in Palestinian studies and fluent in Arabic, convened a press conference in which he shared protocols of the PNC session and the videotape which  proved Arafat never canceled the PLO covenant.</p>
<p>But the damage was already done. Thanks to the obfuscations of Martin Indyk, Arafat and the PLO received United States diplomatic recognition and foreign aid from the U.S., which continues to this day.</p>
<p>In December 1998, President Clinton, finally convinced that Indyk’s 1996 covenant report was  wrong, arrived in Gaza, accompanied by Indyk, where they asked for a show of hands from members of the PNC as to whether they want to cancel the PLO covenant and make peace with Israel. The real answer, however, they got the next day.  Arafat’s personal spokesman, Yassir Abed Abbo, told the media that the PNC had, of course, not canceled any covenant.</p>
<p>Yet there is more.</p>
<p>In September, 2000, Dr. Uzi Landau, now a senior minister in the Israeli government, who  served then as the head of the Knesset State Control Committee (the equivalent of the U.S. Senate’s Committee on Governmental Affairs), took the unusual step of filing a formal complaint against United States Ambassador to Israel Martin Indyk.</p>
<p>Landau quoted the September 16, 2000 report in the Guardian of London that “the U.S. Ambassador to Israel yesterday urged Israel to share Jerusalem with the Palestinians.” Mr. Indyk said: “There is no other solution but to share the holy city… ” and Landau also noted that Ambassador Indyk was similarly quoted by the Associated Press, The Jerusalem Post and Ha’aretz.</p>
<p>Landau went on to say that “the timing of the speech and the political context in which it was delivered leave no room for doubt that Ambassador Indyk was calling on the Government of Israel to divide Jerusalem. Indeed, the Guardian correspondent described the remarks as ‘a sharp departure from Washington orthodoxy in recent years.’”</p>
<p>In addition to his remarks concerning Jerusalem, Ambassador Indyk offered his views regarding secular-religious tensions in Israel and the role of the Reform and Conservative movements in Judaism. He also intimated his tacit support for Prime Minister Barak’s so-called secular revolution. As a commentator in the liberal daily Ha’aretz, noted: “readers are urged to imagine what the Americans would say if the Israeli ambassador to Washington were to come to a local religious institution and say such things.”</p>
<p>Landau, who has served in a ministerial post in the Israeli government that negotiated sensitive relations between the U.S. and Israel, mentioned in his letter to Clinton that he wished to “strongly protest Ambassador Indyk’s blatant interference in Israel’s internal affairs and democratic process… I am sure you would agree that it is simply unacceptable for a foreign diplomat to involve himself so provocatively in the most sensitive affairs of the country to which he is posted. If a foreign ambassador stationed in the United States were to involve himself in a domestic American policy debate regarding race relations or abortion, the subsequent outcry would not be long in coming… Ambassador Indyk’s remarks about Jerusalem are an affront to Israel, particularly since he made them in the heart of the city that he aspires to divide. By needlessly raising Arab expectations on the Jerusalem issue, rather than moderating them, Ambassador Indyk has caused inestimable damage to the peace process. It is likewise inexplicable that Ambassador Indyk would choose to interject his private religious preferences into the debate over secular-religious tensions in Israel.”</p>
<p>Landau made it a point even more by stating that “this is not the first time that the American Embassy in Israel has interfered in our internal affairs. In February, I wrote to you in the wake of media reports that Embassy officials were lobbying Israeli-Arab leaders regarding a possible referendum on the Golan Heights. My fear is that such interference in Israel’s affairs is rapidly becoming routine.”</p>
<p>Landau concluded his  letter to Clinton with a “request that you recall Ambassador Indyk to the United States.”</p>
<p>Two months later, in early November 2000, Arafat’s Second Intifada terror campaign was getting underway, Indyk was strongly condemning Israel’s military actions against Arafat’s forces. Indyk remarked that what the Israelis had to do was to get Arafat to act against the perpetrators of the violence, such as Hamas, Tanzim gangs and the Islamic Jihad diplomatically. He did not mention that Arafat’s own Force 17 bodyguard, Preventive Security and other Palestinian Authority forces were also responsible for a considerable portion of the violence. Indyk never wanted to hold Arafat responsible when Arafat’s forces carried out terrorist activities.</p>
<p>In late November 2000, when Israel issued a “white paper” on intercepted intelligence from Arafat’s headquarters that showed documentary evidence that Arafat and his mainstream PLO gangs were indeed facilitating the campaign of terror, Indyk made a special trip to Jerusalem to demand that the Israeli government withdraw its report. Indyk had just reported to the U.S. Congress that the Palestinian groups organizing the terror campaign were NOT under Arafat’s control.</p>
<p>Eight months later, on May 21, 2001, in an address to Ben Gurion University, Indyk stuck to his guns and continued to position that Arafat and the PLO were the “U.S. colleagues in the War on Terror by telling Israel”: “What you do is you get Arafat to act against the perpetrators of the violence, Hamas, Tanzim gangs, the Islamic Jihad and you get the Israeli government to hold back the Israeli army while he does so. But that requires a great deal of energy and commitment on Arafat’s part — in very risky circumstances to take on the very angry Palestinian street — and that requires a great deal of restraint and forbearance on the part of the government of Israel.”</p>
<p>Indyk’s admonition to Israel to turn the other cheek when it came to Arafat  became his mantra.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Kelso</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/caroline-glick/john-kerrys-jewish-best-friends/comment-page-1/#comment-5406504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Kelso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224399#comment-5406504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 692/709 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 05:48:03 by W3 Total Cache -->