Psychoanalysis, Islam, and Joseph Massad

Joseph-MassadWhat do psychoanalysis, liberalism, and Islam have in common? A recent lecture at Stanford University with the curious title, “Psychoanalysis and the Other of Liberalism,” purported to answer that question. Delivered by Joseph Massad, an associate professor of modern Arab politics and intellectual history at Columbia University and co-sponsored by Stanford’s Abassi Program in Islamic Studies, the talk was attended by approximately a dozen graduate students who sat around a long, rectangular table with several circulated chapters of Massad’s tentatively titled forthcoming book, Islam In Liberalism, in hand.

Massad began by describing his book, which he explained is not “concerned with liberal trends in Islam,” but with “how Western liberalism constituted itself and, in constituting, created an object called ‘Islam’ as its ‘Other.’” Claiming that polarization between the East and West was present at “the birth of European liberalism in the eighteenth century,” with Islam being unfairly associated with oppression, he blamed liberal thinkers such as Montesquieu and the concept of “Oriental despotism,” which he equated with “Islamic totalitarianism today.” That such negative associations have a basis in reality both then and now went unremarked; in Massad’s scheme, the Enlightenment was about little more than irrational opposition to Islam.

Referencing another forthcoming book, Massad examined “the deployment” of the word “Islam” as if its mere usage constitutes a weapon:

The uses of the word have changed. Islam can refer to the Koran, Islamist politics, philosophy and history. Islam denotes all these things. It becomes difficult to understand what is the significance of this term for the person deploying it.

He also contested the “Orientalist translations” of “Islam” as meaning “subjection and surrender,” claiming instead that “it means ‘deliverance.’” Contradicting his previous claim that “lumping the three [Abrahamic religions]” together “is an Orientalist invention, ecumenical invention, equalizing what it unequal at base in power relations,” Massad made the Islamic supremacist claim that Islam, “also means ‘monotheism.’ It is the religion of all the prophets who came before. Jews and Christians are Muslims because they believe in one god.”

In contrast to Islam, Massad maintained that Protestant Christianity acquired “a positive meaning” through the Enlightenment because it was seen as a “pre-condition of democracy.” “Islam as a problem for democracy also begins at that time,” he added.

Massad renewed his critique of Montesquieu, whom he blamed for creating the impression that women in the Muslim world were oppressed:

Montesquieu was the first to depict Muslim women as somehow living in some sort of slave-like subjection. . . . This carried over to the nineteenth century white women’s movement, the later proselytization campaigns of the 1880s and 1890s, [and] the British campaigns going on in Egypt and India. Christianity and women’s rights were juxtaposed.

He never denied that such “slave-like subjection” actually existed, but implied as much with a sarcastic tone to which his audience tittered appreciatively.

Massad did offer statistics for the deplorable condition of Muslim women in the twentieth century, referencing clitorectomies and honor killings, but lost all bearing when he equated the latter with the number of American women murdered each year by their husbands or boyfriends. Such crimes, he complained, are “never attributable to American forms of Christianity or culture” and are seen as going “against American cultural values.” Perhaps that’s because this is true: unlike honor killings, these murders are not sanctioned by religion, society, or authorities.

Massad, whose controversial 2007 book Desiring Arabs posited that homosexuality in the Muslim world is merely a Western construct, then warned of “an attempt to create a discipline of ‘queer Middle East studies,’” which he described as “a projection of the liberal constitution of itself as sexual citizenship.” He dismissed international efforts to fight the persecution of both gays and women in the Muslim world as:

Christianity proselytizing to the heathens in order to save them, and if failing that, perhaps at least being able to save the women and the homosexuals, the save and rescue missionary campaigns.

He bemoaned “the human rights activism that goes on at the UN and the NGOs” because it “seems to target religion itself and theology; that somehow the problem is lodged in Islam, something called the culture of Islam.” Massad’s concerns lay not with human rights, but with the alleged creation of “the Other,” which was in turn a “form of pathology” requiring psychoanalysis.

Massad concluded by discussing Sigmund Freud’s contentious book, Moses and Monotheism, but instead of emphasizing psychoanalysis, he stressed Freud’s opposition to political Zionism. Paraphrasing his mentor, the late Columbia University professor Edward Said, he praised Freud for his “subversive move . . . against Zionism and Jewish nationalism.”

Indeed, Massad’s overall stress on psychoanalysis was merely a pretext for sophistry. Noting that “psychoanalysis is precisely against the notion of a free subject . . . we do not choose; every action is governed by a complex of processes,” Massad concluded that “freedom to choose is meaningless; a laughable notion” that “undermines the entire rubric of liberal freedom.” In other words, universal standards of freedom do not exist. It’s all in your head.

Afterwards, an attendee praised the “high intellectual level” of the lecture, while a graduate student expressed her desire for a position similar to Massad’s at Columbia University. If hare-brained, politicized, jargon-spouting, morally vacuous talks such as the one Massad delivered at Stanford are the goal, she may find herself with a job. However, she might also require psychoanalysis.

Berkeley resident Rima Greene co-wrote this article with Cinnamon Stillwell, the West Coast Representative for Campus Watch, a project of the Middle East Forum. Stillwell can be reached at stillwell@meforum.org.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.  

Make sure to Subscribe to Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, and LIKE it on Facebook.

  • http://ironburka.blogspot.com/ Mullah Lodabullah

    “Western liberalism” somehow split the world into muslim and non-muslim and created an ‘Islamic other’ in the process. Sounds like an egg laying a chicken.

  • Ye Bin

    “What do psychoanalysis, liberalism, and Islam have in common?”

    A common fate.

  • objectivefactsmatter

    Wow. They’ve been othered. That’s all it takes to evoke class-victim narratives these days.

  • randy harrison

    The so-called intelligent ones seem to be the thickest, densest, slowest, most channel minded people.

    • Roy_Cam

      Intellectualized defenses are the hardest to overcome.

      Defenses against feeling held in the body by a typical working-class man or woman, are easier to overcome.

  • Tradecraft46

    Again we get the ‘false consciousness’ argument, which is finally ignoring experience in the names of untested ideals. Want some?

  • self awareness

    Obviously the prof is making enemies out of the West- exactly what he accuses the West of doing to others. Projecting your anger onto your political enemies is the staple thought process of politics. And you know the herd will turn its anger on you if you say anything that doesn’t fit the agenda. The herd will love you and think you are brilliant if you express their anger. I liked the comment about the sarcasm that was appreciated by the students. When I was a college professor, I heard that sarcasm come out of my own mouth. We all learn the communication habits of those around us.

  • Raymond_in_DC

    Massad is working hard to carry on the traditions and methods of his teacher, Edward Said – they being, of course, obtaining a prominent position from which to spout historic and economic nonsense to yet more impressionable students.

  • wileyvet

    Could someone please explain the proliferation and purpose of Muslim, Islamic, Arab Studies departments and faculties in American universities? What is with the infatuation with such programs? At least the west had and has enlightened thinkers like Montesquieu unlike the ignoramuses like Islamic imams and ayatollahs. Where are the Muslim Montesquieus, Voltaires, Descartes, John Lockes, Edmund Burkes, Baruch Spinozas, David Humes et al? Where are the Muslim John Jays, Jeffersons, Madisons, Hamiltons, Franklins and Adamses. Where indeed? I wish Mr. Massad would get a visit from The Mossad.

    • Roy_Cam

      The courses proliferate because the intellectual class want to rationalize their incapacity to stand up for anything, any value, any type of boundary.

      If the intellectual class stood up for reason and the values of conscience, they would come too close to espousing conservative or “classic liberal”, as in Jeffersonian, points of view.

      Then the intellectual would succumb to his own condemnation.

      That’s how twisted they are.

      • Geoffrey_Britain

        Saudi money has much more to do with it. It’s part of the ‘stealth’ jihad.

        • Roy_Cam

          Saudi money can pay for this but Saudi money can’t create the will to propagate it nor the will to accept it.

          It is a disease of the soul.

    • SCREW SOCIALISM

      The Muslim intelligentsia were beheaded by Muslims.

  • solinkaa

    Massad’s obviously never heard of Islamic forays into Central and Eastern Europe, with thousands murdered and thousands marched out as slaves, including children to be groomed as janissaries; never heard of the Battle of Kosovo (AD1389) and how all this might have influenced “perception” of Islam in the West. Islamic scholarship for you.

  • Roy_Cam

    Seems insane. No other way to put it

    Massad has actually presented an intellectualized defense of his own hysteria, his own flight from reason.

  • Geoffrey_Britain

    Massad is a practitioner of taqqiyya . He’s acting as a fifth columnist. Deport him or if a US citizen, throw him in jail for sedition.

    • SCREW SOCIALISM

      Guantanamo needs a new inmate.

  • seewithyourowneyes

    Islam championed violent “othering” more than a thousand years before the Cultural Marxists ever invented it.