<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Pound of White Flesh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/david-horowitz/a-pound-of-white-flesh-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/david-horowitz/a-pound-of-white-flesh-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-pound-of-white-flesh-2</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 10:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: aronitethinking</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/david-horowitz/a-pound-of-white-flesh-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5479817</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aronitethinking]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2014 18:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=239177#comment-5479817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The right thing and choice of word must be a full Judicial Investigation-which might recommend a Prosecution if evidence justified that. Prosecution implies a Prima facie offense-which is actually pre-judice trial by media.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The right thing and choice of word must be a full Judicial Investigation-which might recommend a Prosecution if evidence justified that. Prosecution implies a Prima facie offense-which is actually pre-judice trial by media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/david-horowitz/a-pound-of-white-flesh-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5477657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 02:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=239177#comment-5477657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;You can&#039;t prosecute someone if he hasn&#039;t been charged with a crime. Are you going to charge him with the possibility of committing a crime? That is absurd, and contrary to innocent until proven guilty. The key word there is &quot;proven.&quot; &quot;

You are confused.  As I don&#039;t have time to endlessly repeat the obvious that you inexplicably believe I do not accept, let&#039;s look at this one last time:

1.  Main point:  You took the governor to task for putting prosecution before &quot;trial.&quot;  That&#039;s simply stupid.  Prosecution must precede trial.  No prosecution, no trial.

2.  Your diversionary point:  grand jury.  You argue both technicality and &quot;clear intent.  Let&#039;s look at both:

a.  Technicality:  Prosecution begins when the prosecutor begins legal proceedings against an individual.  The &quot;neutral investigative&quot; stage of determining whether a crime occurs is conducted by the police forces and coroners, and when one of the two believes that they have sufficient evidence to take action against an individual, the prosecutor&#039;s office takes over.  I offered you a link to a legal dictionary that explicitly notes that prosecution begins with the initiation of information, grand jury, or certain coroner&#039;s reports.  In a quick search for an explicit legal definition, one find&#039;s New Mexico&#039;s statute on malicious prosecution defines prosecution to include the attempt to procure an indictment.  

Further, you misstate the purpose of the grand jury.  Grand juries do not exist to perform neutral investigation; they exist as a check on malicious prosecution and abuse of power.  Their job is not to investigate, but to evaluate the results of previous investigation as presented to them (by &lt;i&gt;the prosecutor&lt;/i&gt;) to determine whether the evidence truly justifies the charges sought by the prosecutor.

b.  &quot;Clear intent.&quot;  If you want appeal to the reality of the situation, the grand jury is considered in modern times to be essentially a rubber-stamp of the prosecutor&#039;s office.  Procedurally, the prosecutor fully controls the presentation of evidence, incriminating and exculpatory.  Justice Douglas had this to say about grand juries:  &quot;It is, indeed, common knowledge that the Grand Jury, having been conceived as a bulwark between the citizen and the Government, is now a tool of the Executive.&quot; (http://corporate.findlaw.com/litigation-disputes/grand-jury-indictment-versus-prosecution-by-information-an-equal.html#sthash.Hj5k8C1C.dpuf)  

To recap:  What you said was clearly nonsensical - trials cannot precede prosecution - and in your digression into the grand jury, you err in understanding when prosecution begins.  

&quot;That in and of itself is a comment on you...&quot;



There is no end to your comments on me; the day may come when one is worth reading.  


I regret that this will probably be the last chance I have to post for a few days; make the most of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You can&#8217;t prosecute someone if he hasn&#8217;t been charged with a crime. Are you going to charge him with the possibility of committing a crime? That is absurd, and contrary to innocent until proven guilty. The key word there is &#8220;proven.&#8221; &#8221;</p>
<p>You are confused.  As I don&#8217;t have time to endlessly repeat the obvious that you inexplicably believe I do not accept, let&#8217;s look at this one last time:</p>
<p>1.  Main point:  You took the governor to task for putting prosecution before &#8220;trial.&#8221;  That&#8217;s simply stupid.  Prosecution must precede trial.  No prosecution, no trial.</p>
<p>2.  Your diversionary point:  grand jury.  You argue both technicality and &#8220;clear intent.  Let&#8217;s look at both:</p>
<p>a.  Technicality:  Prosecution begins when the prosecutor begins legal proceedings against an individual.  The &#8220;neutral investigative&#8221; stage of determining whether a crime occurs is conducted by the police forces and coroners, and when one of the two believes that they have sufficient evidence to take action against an individual, the prosecutor&#8217;s office takes over.  I offered you a link to a legal dictionary that explicitly notes that prosecution begins with the initiation of information, grand jury, or certain coroner&#8217;s reports.  In a quick search for an explicit legal definition, one find&#8217;s New Mexico&#8217;s statute on malicious prosecution defines prosecution to include the attempt to procure an indictment.  </p>
<p>Further, you misstate the purpose of the grand jury.  Grand juries do not exist to perform neutral investigation; they exist as a check on malicious prosecution and abuse of power.  Their job is not to investigate, but to evaluate the results of previous investigation as presented to them (by <i>the prosecutor</i>) to determine whether the evidence truly justifies the charges sought by the prosecutor.</p>
<p>b.  &#8220;Clear intent.&#8221;  If you want appeal to the reality of the situation, the grand jury is considered in modern times to be essentially a rubber-stamp of the prosecutor&#8217;s office.  Procedurally, the prosecutor fully controls the presentation of evidence, incriminating and exculpatory.  Justice Douglas had this to say about grand juries:  &#8220;It is, indeed, common knowledge that the Grand Jury, having been conceived as a bulwark between the citizen and the Government, is now a tool of the Executive.&#8221; (<a href="http://corporate.findlaw.com/litigation-disputes/grand-jury-indictment-versus-prosecution-by-information-an-equal.html#sthash.Hj5k8C1C.dpuf" rel="nofollow">http://corporate.findlaw.com/litigation-disputes/grand-jury-indictment-versus-prosecution-by-information-an-equal.html#sthash.Hj5k8C1C.dpuf</a>)  </p>
<p>To recap:  What you said was clearly nonsensical &#8211; trials cannot precede prosecution &#8211; and in your digression into the grand jury, you err in understanding when prosecution begins.  </p>
<p>&#8220;That in and of itself is a comment on you&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>There is no end to your comments on me; the day may come when one is worth reading.  </p>
<p>I regret that this will probably be the last chance I have to post for a few days; make the most of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/david-horowitz/a-pound-of-white-flesh-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5477627</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 23:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=239177#comment-5477627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You refuse to accept the obvious...not one of your better traits. 
You can&#039;t prosecute someone if he hasn&#039;t been charged with a crime. Are you going to charge him with the possibility of committing a crime? That is absurd, and contrary to innocent until proven guilty. The key word there is &quot;proven.&quot; 
You can&#039;t determine if he may have committed the crime until you compile all of the evidence and witness accounts. That is the neutral investigative stage of determining if a crime occurred, or who may have done it. Likewise, if there are three suspects, you can&#039;t prosecute all three for the actions of one. Calling a Grand Jury is one way to establish grounds for charging someone with a crime, but until there are provable grounds, there can&#039;t be a prosecution, especially the kind proposed by the slimebage governor... a politician who wanted to persecute Wilson for political reasons and wasn&#039;t interested in first determining the truth.


You nitpicked my comment, glossing over the clear intent. Prosecution that is motivated by politics is persecution, and that is what Holder, Nixon, and Obama, among many others on the Left, want to see in America. You should be just as outraged, yet you are more concerned with trying to dissect my comment. That in and of itself is a comment on you and your dubious priorities.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You refuse to accept the obvious&#8230;not one of your better traits.<br />
You can&#8217;t prosecute someone if he hasn&#8217;t been charged with a crime. Are you going to charge him with the possibility of committing a crime? That is absurd, and contrary to innocent until proven guilty. The key word there is &#8220;proven.&#8221;<br />
You can&#8217;t determine if he may have committed the crime until you compile all of the evidence and witness accounts. That is the neutral investigative stage of determining if a crime occurred, or who may have done it. Likewise, if there are three suspects, you can&#8217;t prosecute all three for the actions of one. Calling a Grand Jury is one way to establish grounds for charging someone with a crime, but until there are provable grounds, there can&#8217;t be a prosecution, especially the kind proposed by the slimebage governor&#8230; a politician who wanted to persecute Wilson for political reasons and wasn&#8217;t interested in first determining the truth.</p>
<p>You nitpicked my comment, glossing over the clear intent. Prosecution that is motivated by politics is persecution, and that is what Holder, Nixon, and Obama, among many others on the Left, want to see in America. You should be just as outraged, yet you are more concerned with trying to dissect my comment. That in and of itself is a comment on you and your dubious priorities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrUniteUs1</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/david-horowitz/a-pound-of-white-flesh-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5477230</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MrUniteUs1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=239177#comment-5477230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The West Bank were living peacefully and negotiating with Israel, thus setting example for Gaza residents. However when they reached to out Hamas. Netanyahu pounced. Netanyahu needs Hamas and Hamas needs Netanyahu. They use each other to justify the hatred.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The West Bank were living peacefully and negotiating with Israel, thus setting example for Gaza residents. However when they reached to out Hamas. Netanyahu pounced. Netanyahu needs Hamas and Hamas needs Netanyahu. They use each other to justify the hatred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/david-horowitz/a-pound-of-white-flesh-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5477116</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=239177#comment-5477116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Speaking of civil rights, the governor, Jay Nixon, has called for &quot;the vigorous prosecution&quot; of Darren Wilson.”
www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2014/08/20/limbaugh_theorem_the_white_house_debates_sending_obama_to_ferguson
What the Governor should call for is a grand jury to look into the incident and find out the facts and if the facts warrant to call for a prosecution.  When Governor Jay Nixon called for a vigorous prosecution had a grand jury even met much less returned an indictment?
The legal community might call the proceeding of a grand jury a prosecution.  That is not how the man in the street sees it.  What the American street sees, the part of the American street that is not beholden to the Democrat Party, is that Governor Jay Nixon is calling for a prosecution in a kangaroo court.
I am not totally sure what happened.  I do not know as of today whether Officer Derek Wilson suffered a broken eye socket or not.  I do know that Governor Nixon and Eric Holder wanted to suppress the convenience store tape. I do know that Michael Brown’s companion is a known liar.  Based on those facts and purported facts to call for a vigorous prosecution would seem to the average man that Nixon believes Derek Wilson is guilty before there was a trial or before a grand jury has convened or indicted the officer.  
I would be hesitant to call for a vigorous prosecution even after a grand jury returned an indictment.  We all know the old adage that you can indict a ham sandwich.

IMO police need cameras to protect themselves and to protect the public.

I also know that Michael Brown was stupid and was engaged in behavior that many black youth engage in.  That is walking ibn the street and giving people crap.  They did in my city.  The cops put a stop to it.  I drove through that part of the city to see for myself. Sure enough it was true.  When it can take you 3 to 5 minutes to travel the length of 3 houses and the youths are angry at you just for passing through, you go a problem.  I saw the same behaviour when I went to my old neighborhood .  3 or 4 women were walking abreast pushing strollers, and they were not going to move.    You do not walk a block in the middle of the road at 5 mph or slower and expect other people to be happy with your rudeness/antics. 
All Michael Brown had to do is get off the street and tell the officer he wouldn’t do it again.  You can get out of tickets and only get warnings if you are not overtly hostile to police.  But the word in much of the black community is the opposite.


prosecution (noun): the act or process of holding a trial against a person who is accused of a crime to see if that person is guilty
the prosecution : the side of a legal case which argues that a person who is accused of a crime is guilty : the lawyer or lawyers who prosecute someone in a court case
: the act of doing or continuing to do something
Full Definition of PROSECUTION
1:  the act or process of prosecuting; specifically :  the institution and continuance of a criminal suit involving the process of pursuing formal charges against an offender to final judgment 
2:  the party by
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Speaking of civil rights, the governor, Jay Nixon, has called for &#8220;the vigorous prosecution&#8221; of Darren Wilson.”<br />
<a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2014/08/20/limbaugh_theorem_the_white_house_debates_sending_obama_to_ferguson" rel="nofollow">http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2014/08/20/limbaugh_theorem_the_white_house_debates_sending_obama_to_ferguson</a><br />
What the Governor should call for is a grand jury to look into the incident and find out the facts and if the facts warrant to call for a prosecution.  When Governor Jay Nixon called for a vigorous prosecution had a grand jury even met much less returned an indictment?<br />
The legal community might call the proceeding of a grand jury a prosecution.  That is not how the man in the street sees it.  What the American street sees, the part of the American street that is not beholden to the Democrat Party, is that Governor Jay Nixon is calling for a prosecution in a kangaroo court.<br />
I am not totally sure what happened.  I do not know as of today whether Officer Derek Wilson suffered a broken eye socket or not.  I do know that Governor Nixon and Eric Holder wanted to suppress the convenience store tape. I do know that Michael Brown’s companion is a known liar.  Based on those facts and purported facts to call for a vigorous prosecution would seem to the average man that Nixon believes Derek Wilson is guilty before there was a trial or before a grand jury has convened or indicted the officer.<br />
I would be hesitant to call for a vigorous prosecution even after a grand jury returned an indictment.  We all know the old adage that you can indict a ham sandwich.</p>
<p>IMO police need cameras to protect themselves and to protect the public.</p>
<p>I also know that Michael Brown was stupid and was engaged in behavior that many black youth engage in.  That is walking ibn the street and giving people crap.  They did in my city.  The cops put a stop to it.  I drove through that part of the city to see for myself. Sure enough it was true.  When it can take you 3 to 5 minutes to travel the length of 3 houses and the youths are angry at you just for passing through, you go a problem.  I saw the same behaviour when I went to my old neighborhood .  3 or 4 women were walking abreast pushing strollers, and they were not going to move.    You do not walk a block in the middle of the road at 5 mph or slower and expect other people to be happy with your rudeness/antics.<br />
All Michael Brown had to do is get off the street and tell the officer he wouldn’t do it again.  You can get out of tickets and only get warnings if you are not overtly hostile to police.  But the word in much of the black community is the opposite.</p>
<p>prosecution (noun): the act or process of holding a trial against a person who is accused of a crime to see if that person is guilty<br />
the prosecution : the side of a legal case which argues that a person who is accused of a crime is guilty : the lawyer or lawyers who prosecute someone in a court case<br />
: the act of doing or continuing to do something<br />
Full Definition of PROSECUTION<br />
1:  the act or process of prosecuting; specifically :  the institution and continuance of a criminal suit involving the process of pursuing formal charges against an offender to final judgment<br />
2:  the party by</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drack</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/david-horowitz/a-pound-of-white-flesh-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5476953</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=239177#comment-5476953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know what horowitz&#039;s thoughts are on this case, but I can only imagine.  I guess O J was innocent.  No wonder why the world turned a blind eye during World War ll.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what horowitz&#8217;s thoughts are on this case, but I can only imagine.  I guess O J was innocent.  No wonder why the world turned a blind eye during World War ll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/david-horowitz/a-pound-of-white-flesh-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5476946</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=239177#comment-5476946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with the statement is that it objects to placing prosecution before trial.  Prosecution necessarily precedes trial; absent prosecution, there is no trial.

It is at trial that one determines guilt or innocence.  A demand for prosecution reveals that the speaker is convinced that there is sufficient evidence to require decision at trial, but it is not the same as demanding (or presupposing) conviction.

There may be other statements from the governor that indicate such belief, but the statement that Truebearing highlighted, and to which he objected, is not objectionable on the grounds Truebearing invoked.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with the statement is that it objects to placing prosecution before trial.  Prosecution necessarily precedes trial; absent prosecution, there is no trial.</p>
<p>It is at trial that one determines guilt or innocence.  A demand for prosecution reveals that the speaker is convinced that there is sufficient evidence to require decision at trial, but it is not the same as demanding (or presupposing) conviction.</p>
<p>There may be other statements from the governor that indicate such belief, but the statement that Truebearing highlighted, and to which he objected, is not objectionable on the grounds Truebearing invoked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/david-horowitz/a-pound-of-white-flesh-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5476945</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=239177#comment-5476945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Any more brilliant legal insights you care to share?&quot;

Sure.  You have just offered some impassioned paragraphs insisting that a grand jury is not &lt;i&gt;technically&lt;/i&gt; a prosecution, although it is sought and conducted by a prosecutor.  

However, you are seeking acquittal on a technicality of a crime with which you were not charged.  The objection you raised was to the governor&#039;s &quot;vile&quot; comment calling for prosecution before trial, not prosecution before grand jury.  Have you come up with a legal theory that places trial before prosecution, or would you prefer to proceed directly to the ad hominems?

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Any more brilliant legal insights you care to share?&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure.  You have just offered some impassioned paragraphs insisting that a grand jury is not <i>technically</i> a prosecution, although it is sought and conducted by a prosecutor.  </p>
<p>However, you are seeking acquittal on a technicality of a crime with which you were not charged.  The objection you raised was to the governor&#8217;s &#8220;vile&#8221; comment calling for prosecution before trial, not prosecution before grand jury.  Have you come up with a legal theory that places trial before prosecution, or would you prefer to proceed directly to the ad hominems?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/david-horowitz/a-pound-of-white-flesh-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5476898</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 06:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=239177#comment-5476898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And he did it before any charges were filed, or all of the real evidence was collected. Apparently, Hiernonymouse thinks one can be prosecuted for a crime before one is charged with that crime. Talk about befuddled.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And he did it before any charges were filed, or all of the real evidence was collected. Apparently, Hiernonymouse thinks one can be prosecuted for a crime before one is charged with that crime. Talk about befuddled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/david-horowitz/a-pound-of-white-flesh-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5476897</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 06:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=239177#comment-5476897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prosecution can&#039;t happen if there are no charges filed, dim wit. What does the prosecutor prosecute if no charge is filed? DUH! No charge...no arrest...no grand jury...but you and the idiot governor believe prosecution  is the next step. Thanks for the laugh.


The prosecutor may call for and lead the Grand Jury, but he isn&#039;t technically prosecuting until there is an indictment The purpose of the Grand Jury is to find out if there is evidence that a crime has been committed. You don&#039;t prosecute someone until you have said evidence, know-it-all. If there is sufficient evidence, the Grand Jury hands down an indictment and the prosecution begins then.


The moron of a governor was talking as if the evidence was irrefutable that Wilson was guilty, when the evidence was trending that Wison was charged by Brown. Only a true moron thinks you can start a prosecution without waiting for all of the lab reports,  witness interviews, etc, and then without charging him with a specific crime.  


Prosecutors don&#039;t work like you think, Thank God. They know better than to start a prosecution before they have evidence of a crime.


 Any more brilliant legal insights you care to share?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prosecution can&#8217;t happen if there are no charges filed, dim wit. What does the prosecutor prosecute if no charge is filed? DUH! No charge&#8230;no arrest&#8230;no grand jury&#8230;but you and the idiot governor believe prosecution  is the next step. Thanks for the laugh.</p>
<p>The prosecutor may call for and lead the Grand Jury, but he isn&#8217;t technically prosecuting until there is an indictment The purpose of the Grand Jury is to find out if there is evidence that a crime has been committed. You don&#8217;t prosecute someone until you have said evidence, know-it-all. If there is sufficient evidence, the Grand Jury hands down an indictment and the prosecution begins then.</p>
<p>The moron of a governor was talking as if the evidence was irrefutable that Wilson was guilty, when the evidence was trending that Wison was charged by Brown. Only a true moron thinks you can start a prosecution without waiting for all of the lab reports,  witness interviews, etc, and then without charging him with a specific crime.  </p>
<p>Prosecutors don&#8217;t work like you think, Thank God. They know better than to start a prosecution before they have evidence of a crime.</p>
<p> Any more brilliant legal insights you care to share?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrUniteUs1</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/david-horowitz/a-pound-of-white-flesh-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5476752</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MrUniteUs1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=239177#comment-5476752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wilson looked fine in the video. Medical records make no mention of eye damage. Not one witness said Brown charged. Officer.  One witness he stumbled fwd one or two steps as he was falling to the ground after being shot. All agree that Brown had his hands up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wilson looked fine in the video. Medical records make no mention of eye damage. Not one witness said Brown charged. Officer.  One witness he stumbled fwd one or two steps as he was falling to the ground after being shot. All agree that Brown had his hands up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inja</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/david-horowitz/a-pound-of-white-flesh-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5476726</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[inja]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2014 22:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=239177#comment-5476726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THIS WILL BE ANOTHER O.J. SIMPSON TRIAL, BUT INSTEAD OF AN INNOCENT VERDICT, THE COURT WILL BE FORCED BY THREATS OF STREET VIOLENCE TO FIND OFFICER WILSON GUILTY!!
IF JUSTICE PREVAILS AND WILSON IS FOUND INNOCENT, LET THE BASTARDS DESTROY THEIR OWN TOWNS...............]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THIS WILL BE ANOTHER O.J. SIMPSON TRIAL, BUT INSTEAD OF AN INNOCENT VERDICT, THE COURT WILL BE FORCED BY THREATS OF STREET VIOLENCE TO FIND OFFICER WILSON GUILTY!!<br />
IF JUSTICE PREVAILS AND WILSON IS FOUND INNOCENT, LET THE BASTARDS DESTROY THEIR OWN TOWNS&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/david-horowitz/a-pound-of-white-flesh-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5476692</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2014 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=239177#comment-5476692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The governor of Missouri did us all a favor yesterday when he mouthed his vile call for prosecution before there is even a trial, much less an indictment. What he unwittingly told America is that if you are white and defend yourself against blacks, even when they are the criminal aggressor, you will be punished by the government.&quot; - Truebearing

I see no problem with that statement.  

It says that the governor opened his mouth and removed all doubt.   The statements I head from Governor Jay is that he pre-supposes Derek Wilson&#039;s guilt.

Basically Jay got in line with so many other and convicted the cop in the court of public opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The governor of Missouri did us all a favor yesterday when he mouthed his vile call for prosecution before there is even a trial, much less an indictment. What he unwittingly told America is that if you are white and defend yourself against blacks, even when they are the criminal aggressor, you will be punished by the government.&#8221; &#8211; Truebearing</p>
<p>I see no problem with that statement.  </p>
<p>It says that the governor opened his mouth and removed all doubt.   The statements I head from Governor Jay is that he pre-supposes Derek Wilson&#8217;s guilt.</p>
<p>Basically Jay got in line with so many other and convicted the cop in the court of public opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrUniteUs1</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/david-horowitz/a-pound-of-white-flesh-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5476489</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MrUniteUs1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2014 08:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=239177#comment-5476489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GZ nose wasn&#039;t broken. The gun sites knicked the tip of his nose. 

Turns out Wilsons eyes was not damaged. No broken bones or damaged eye socket. Not surprising, no sign of the pain or injury to Wilson in the video.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GZ nose wasn&#8217;t broken. The gun sites knicked the tip of his nose. </p>
<p>Turns out Wilsons eyes was not damaged. No broken bones or damaged eye socket. Not surprising, no sign of the pain or injury to Wilson in the video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrUniteUs1</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/david-horowitz/a-pound-of-white-flesh-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5476488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MrUniteUs1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2014 08:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=239177#comment-5476488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So who are you going to root for in the Little League World Series Championship today.  The Korean Team from Seoul Korea, or the soul brothers from the South Side of Chicago. The name of their team is Jackie Robinson West. 



Jackie Robinson West wins United States championship, advances to LLWS finals
. 
https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mlb-big-league-stew/jackie-robinson-west-wins-united-states-championship--advances-to-llws-finals-220915410.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So who are you going to root for in the Little League World Series Championship today.  The Korean Team from Seoul Korea, or the soul brothers from the South Side of Chicago. The name of their team is Jackie Robinson West. </p>
<p>Jackie Robinson West wins United States championship, advances to LLWS finals<br />
.<br />
<a href="https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mlb-big-league-stew/jackie-robinson-west-wins-united-states-championship--advances-to-llws-finals-220915410.html" rel="nofollow">https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mlb-big-league-stew/jackie-robinson-west-wins-united-states-championship&#8211;advances-to-llws-finals-220915410.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheechakos</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/david-horowitz/a-pound-of-white-flesh-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5476440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cheechakos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2014 05:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=239177#comment-5476440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are you babbling about?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you babbling about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: infedel taeshawn</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/david-horowitz/a-pound-of-white-flesh-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5476243</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[infedel taeshawn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2014 23:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=239177#comment-5476243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well, if this lady is a holocaust survivor, why is she siding with hamas? They have a stated goal in their charter the murder of all jews. If the arabs in gaza want to free gaza, they need to free it from hamass. The women is obviously deranged, like most of you folks on the left.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, if this lady is a holocaust survivor, why is she siding with hamas? They have a stated goal in their charter the murder of all jews. If the arabs in gaza want to free gaza, they need to free it from hamass. The women is obviously deranged, like most of you folks on the left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhiteHunter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/david-horowitz/a-pound-of-white-flesh-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5476217</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WhiteHunter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2014 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=239177#comment-5476217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all, he wasn&#039;t &quot;murdered.&quot; Second, he was a raging, violent, out-of-control 300-lb. monster who had already smashed in the cop&#039;s face and was charging directly at the dazed, badly wounded cop to &quot;finish the job.&quot;

&quot;Arrest&quot; him? Explain how one cop, alone--since no police reinforcements were on the scene--who&#039;d already had his eye socket shattered and his nose broken by the hulking thug&#039;s fists could have arrested that berserk, drugged-up monster who kept coming despite four intentionally non-fatal gunshots to his arm and shoulder.

The officer did exactly the proper and necessary thing to neutralized this lethal threat to himself and others. You&#039;re just part of the lynch mob.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, he wasn&#8217;t &#8220;murdered.&#8221; Second, he was a raging, violent, out-of-control 300-lb. monster who had already smashed in the cop&#8217;s face and was charging directly at the dazed, badly wounded cop to &#8220;finish the job.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Arrest&#8221; him? Explain how one cop, alone&#8211;since no police reinforcements were on the scene&#8211;who&#8217;d already had his eye socket shattered and his nose broken by the hulking thug&#8217;s fists could have arrested that berserk, drugged-up monster who kept coming despite four intentionally non-fatal gunshots to his arm and shoulder.</p>
<p>The officer did exactly the proper and necessary thing to neutralized this lethal threat to himself and others. You&#8217;re just part of the lynch mob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/david-horowitz/a-pound-of-white-flesh-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5476033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2014 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=239177#comment-5476033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In those cases requiring a grand jury, evidence is presented to the grand jury by ... the prosecutor.  Whether as originally written or as revised, you have have the order wrong - prosecution precedes hearing.  


&quot;Why am I not surprised that you would be the one to defend persecution? &quot;



The only reasonable explanation is that you have emotional reactions to imaginary events.  


&quot;Hiernonymouse assumes guilt...&quot;



You managed to make two mistakes in three words.  


&quot;Are you indirectly defending an Attorney General ...&quot;



I made precisely no reference to the Attorney General.  You seem to be functioning as a sort of reverse Rapunzel today, spinning straw men.


&quot;Your self-vaunted logic has apparently abandoned you, once again.&quot;



You characterized the governor&#039;s comment as &#039;vile&#039; because it called for prosecution &quot;before there is even a trial.&quot;  It was an inane comment.  Prosecution &lt;i&gt;must&lt;/i&gt; precede trial - absent prosecution, there is no trial.   The logic&#039;s fine, and one takes the introduction of straw men in your post as tacit acknowledgement that what was actually said was sound. 




&quot;In case you were wondering, no one has missed you in your recent absence from FPM.&quot;



If you noticed that I&#039;d been away, then you quite obviously &lt;i&gt;did&lt;/i&gt; miss me.   It&#039;s not clear why you think anyone but your family and friends would wonder about what you do or don&#039;t miss.  You will apparently be relieved to learn that you will have more opportunities to miss me in the near future. 


Regards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In those cases requiring a grand jury, evidence is presented to the grand jury by &#8230; the prosecutor.  Whether as originally written or as revised, you have have the order wrong &#8211; prosecution precedes hearing.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Why am I not surprised that you would be the one to defend persecution? &#8221;</p>
<p>The only reasonable explanation is that you have emotional reactions to imaginary events.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Hiernonymouse assumes guilt&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>You managed to make two mistakes in three words.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Are you indirectly defending an Attorney General &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I made precisely no reference to the Attorney General.  You seem to be functioning as a sort of reverse Rapunzel today, spinning straw men.</p>
<p>&#8220;Your self-vaunted logic has apparently abandoned you, once again.&#8221;</p>
<p>You characterized the governor&#8217;s comment as &#8216;vile&#8217; because it called for prosecution &#8220;before there is even a trial.&#8221;  It was an inane comment.  Prosecution <i>must</i> precede trial &#8211; absent prosecution, there is no trial.   The logic&#8217;s fine, and one takes the introduction of straw men in your post as tacit acknowledgement that what was actually said was sound. </p>
<p>&#8220;In case you were wondering, no one has missed you in your recent absence from FPM.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you noticed that I&#8217;d been away, then you quite obviously <i>did</i> miss me.   It&#8217;s not clear why you think anyone but your family and friends would wonder about what you do or don&#8217;t miss.  You will apparently be relieved to learn that you will have more opportunities to miss me in the near future. </p>
<p>Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeh420</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/david-horowitz/a-pound-of-white-flesh-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5475996</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mikeh420]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2014 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=239177#comment-5475996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t say you were black or Anti Semitic. Where did you find out that Zimmerman was Jewish? Mom is Afro-Peruvian and Dad is American of German descent. There are very few Jews in Germany, for obvious reasons, and not a lot in Peru.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t say you were black or Anti Semitic. Where did you find out that Zimmerman was Jewish? Mom is Afro-Peruvian and Dad is American of German descent. There are very few Jews in Germany, for obvious reasons, and not a lot in Peru.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 728/785 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-31 06:03:34 by W3 Total Cache -->