Baby Boom: 1 in 10 Babies and Toddlers in UK are Muslim

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. He is completing a book on the international challenges America faces in the 21st century.


ghost burka women

Demographics is destiny and there isn’t that much time left to turn this horse around before it leaps off the cliff and the United Kingdom is one with Byzantium.

Muslim immigration will doom the UK in another decade to either the Muslim genocide of the native population or an ongoing civil war like in Lebanon, Syria, Yemen and Iraq.

The percentage of Muslims among the under-fives is almost twice as high as in the general population, according to a breakdown of census figures

Census figures reveal a ‘startling’ shift in Britain’s demographic trend with almost a tenth of babies and toddlers born in England and Wales being Muslim.

The percentage of Muslims among the under-fives is almost twice as high as in the general population. Less than one in 200 over 85s are Muslims – an indication of the extent to which birth rate is changing the UK’s religious demographic.

One expert said it was possible that Muslims who worshipped would outnumber practising Christians. “It’s not inconceivable,” said David Voas, Professor of Population Studies at the University of Essex.

It’s not inconceivable means “Even we can’t deny that this is happening.”

Elsewhere in the piece there is an account from Batley in West Yorkshire of how the growing young Muslim population there has led to ‘pubs, hospitals, houses and public buildings’ being turned into ‘Muslim private schools, madrassas, mosques and a Sharia court to satisfy rising demand from families.’

And yes, before long those whippings and beheadings will show up too. It’s how democracy works. In the Muslim world, it took civilized urban elites to brutally shut down the Muslim democracy of the Arab Spring.

Without that, you end up with Pakistan.

  • Race_Dissident

    Baby Boom–love the headline. Cheeky.

    • Martin Ellacott

      I didn’t think they went BOOM until they became older….

      • DB1954

        At least out of the cradle, huh?

    • DB1954

      The pic is creepy. Heck, so’s the headline.

  • Rodney

    Disregard what liberal say. If they study history, they study from a leftist slant.

    Most of us have heard about the Fall of the Roman Empire and the subsequent Germanic kingdoms that replaced it.

    Well read about Spain immediately after the Fall of the Roman empire. The Visigoths made up 2% of the population. How did they control a place that had been Roman for 6 centuries with such paltry number?

    I can’t find the article that mentioned the 2% figure, but I found this

    “They formed the new aristocracy of Spain, taking over the positions of high office, although it is estimated that they comprised no more than five percent of the total population.”

    http://www.britishmuseum.org/explore/highlights/article_index/v/visigoths_spain_and_portugal.aspx

  • GSR

    Same thing happening here, only with so called “Hispanics” (really Mexican Indians or Native Tribesman if you will).
    The basic liberal idea is that Caucasian, Judeo-Christian countries and cultures deserve to be changed by the mass importation of 3rd-worlders. An objection to that is called RACISM and the discussion is shut down, i.e., avoided.

    • Saul

      Are Mexicans not Hispanics and really Mexican Indians? Are we using the 1 drop rule or or a 51% rule?

      “Among persons of Mexican ancestry living in Los Angeles, the genetic makeup is almost equally European and American Indian, with only a thin sliver of African ancestry and the largest percentage of “unassigned” genetic ancestry of any of the three populations.”

      http://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2012/12/08/genome-project-finds-variations-within-ethnic-groups

      People had better stop playing that race shat. They are going to stir up a whole lot of whoop @Race_Dissident:disqus

      Any Mexican American that wants to play the holier than thou I am native American card can have King Solomon’s wisdom applied to their @ss!

      • GSR

        I have no idea what your unintelligible babble means. My initial point was the term “Hispanic” is an almost entirely made-up political word, going back to the Nixon Administration, where it was first popularized. The term is almost exclusively used in the USA; no where else. It’s used as “cover”, to hide the fact that the vast majority of Latinos entering the USA, legally and illegally, are Mexicans and not some elusive “Hispanic”.

        • Saul

          The point I was making is that I reject the notion that we owe it to the Mexican to give them 1/3rd, 1/2 or all of the USA to them because they have some Indian blood.

          BTW I know the term Hispanic is a recent invention just like I know the term “Latin America” was made up by the would be conqueror Napoleon Bonaparte 3rd in the 1850s or thereabout.

          Thank me!

          • DB1954

            Thank you, Saul.

        • DB1954

          I don’t think it was entirely babble. For one thing, “Hispanic” is a word used in reference to people whose origins are in Latin America. (Although there are Spanish-Americans too). Mexicans are overwhelmingly mixed race. The same can be said for almost all if not all Latin American countries, with the possible exceptions perhaps of Argentina and Uruguay, with overwhelmingly caucasion populations. Even so, there are persons of mixed race in those two countries as well. The point is that “Hispanic,” if used as a cultural or linguistic descriptor for any immigrant–legal or illegal– who immigrated here from any of those nations. In fact, that IS, I believe why the word was employed in the first place–as an alternative to a racial descriptor. Unless of course, you have a better one? On the other hand, I have no objections to calling illegal immigrants from Mexico– illegal Mexican immigrants.

    • Timewarped

      Wonder what percentage of the Mexican population today has Spanish blood in it? Wonder how much of Mexico today was originally Mexico, how much was expanded under the Mayan, Inca or whoever the F it might have been ruler, how much was expanded under Spanish rule before it became part of America. The point is that boarders and lands belong to no one, they are temporarily controlled by those who are able to hold them through the support of those who live there or by the force of those who desire them. The rest is all bull crap. Might makes right when it comes to claiming and occupying land.

      • DB1954

        From what I’ve read, the estimates of “pure Caucasian” persons in Mexico is about 10%. I think I’ve read that about 70% of Mexicans are mestizo, which would (mixed Amer-Indian and white). The remainder are largely Amer-Indian, though there are a number of of Afro-Mexicans or Afro-Mestizo Mexicans. As to your post, I think what you’ve said is essentially true. Moreover, it’s reflected in the international law of war.

        • Timewarped

          Thanks, don’t know what the international law of war is but I don’t think Nationalism can or should be overcome or eliminated, therefore, internationalism becomes a bit of a joke and is only given lip service when there is money behind it or profit to be had. As long as people have feelings they will favor their culture and language unless it is a complete and utter failure or full of evil.

          • DB1954

            The international law of war isn’t some kind of written treaty like the Geneva Convention. It’s simply a doctrine which many nations recognize in the legals sense that goes well back into human history. Once a nation or even just a tribe of people conquer a land through military conquest and that same group of people hold onto that land for a significant period of time, the rights of prior residents-that is, those who lost the war, are simply extinguished. It’s something like the old adage, “possession” is 9/10ths of the law.” It’s also a bit like a statute of limitations on claims to land. One example of the international law of war is the United States. The rights to possession or ownership or any claim of sovereignty based on the possession of land of the native citizens–if any ever existed–simply cease to exist at some unspecified point. How long after the Massachusetts Bay Colony’s foundation did the local Indian tribes’ land claims cease to exist? I don’t know, but it wasn’t long. For one thing, in the case of Indians, they actually didn’t even understand the idea of land ownership in the first place, and this was true from the time of the Jamestown VA colony until Andrew Jackson’s day. It’s also true of the Israeli-Arab conflict which has gone on since 1948, at least. In that year the Jews living in the British Mandate of Palestine were first attacked by their Arab neighbors. The Jews defeated them then and again and again in a series of larger and smaller wars ever since. The Jews captured more land on the West Bank and in Gaza. They didn’t have to give that land back, and they don’t now. For one, the Arabs were the aggressors and for another, the Israelis won, pushing the Arabs further back in order to establish more security space between themselves and the Arabs. That is why “greater Israel” was fully justified as were the many settlements since. If the Palestinians were smart, they stop attacking Jews, and start cooperating. But they can’t because anyone who does will be murdered by the violent ones who control the governmental factions Fatah and Hamas. Hamas tries to kill Fatah people because Fatah finds it more beneficial to cooperate quietly with Israel.

  • truebearing

    This makes me sick. Political correctness has proven to be so infectious and potent that it has destroyed the survival instinct of a people that has fought wars constantly for centuries — amongst themselves, all over Europe, and throughout most of the world. This isn’t happening to a people of pacifistic genetics.

    America beware. Political correctness needs to be rejected, both rationally and irrationally. It needs to be utterly expunged from one’s conscience. A hijacked conscience is no conscience at all.

  • Susana Jones

    mother Mary and Joseph , a ghost town or zombie town or Mummiefied town … is that what Islamist are leading to. ?

    • defcon 4

      I can only imagine what would happen to a woman who chose not to wear their black body bag in public.

      • DB1954

        Sword, chopping block. Go imagine … without puking.

  • Kathryn Evans

    “t’s not inconceivable means “Even we can’t deny that this is happening.””

    “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.” – Inigo Montoya

  • Timewarped

    Women dressed like I see in this picture is sick, looks like death and the men who like this are sick

    • DB1954

      That was my response, That pic is C-R-E-E-P-Y.

      • truebearing

        Islam is evil. It doesn’t get any more basic than that.

      • SCREW SOCIALISM

        The Islamofascist KKK – Ladies Division.

    • BS77

      Witness England and other European nations following the PC liberal agenda like lemmings over the cliff. England is committing a slow suicide with its insane immigration and social policies.

      • SCREW SOCIALISM

        I see a Civil War in the UK on the horizon.

        Like the one in Syria.

        • DB1954

          I don’t live in the UK, so I wouldn’t know if it’s on the brink of civil war. That said, if it comes, it will be no surprise to me, and the blame rests squarely on the shoulders of all those Members of Parliament, Tory, Labour, and Lib, who thought that all those poor saps they were supposed to represent were all just racists and bigots. British Leftists will then find out just what real racism is. If they’re alive after it’s over, I hope they realize that THEY brought it on Britain, though I doubt they will. They’re the ones who bought the lie promoted by George Galloway and the far left–multiculturalism.

  • Sheva

    Soon Hispanics and blacks will outnumber whites in USA – think about that in terms if votes. Goodbye USA. Enjoy democracy by numbers where the masses control the USA politically whilst hardly contributing to the economy. It’s coming.. Soon…. To your country!!

    • Well Done

      I don’t care if anyone calls me racist, the simple fact is that most countries controlled by “hispanics and black” are backwaters of human rights abuses and misery. I don’t care why that is. It simply is.

      • truebearing

        Never submit to political correctness. It is the end of freedom and justice. Death, in one form or another, is the net result of Marxism or Islam, so what is to be gained by submitting to evil?

      • iluvisrael

        add muslim to the list

    • DB1954

      Why you think Democrats want to bring as many Mexicans here as they can?

    • BagLady

      You mean unlike the present system, where money decides who runs things and how? The masses controlling the government eh? That’s a novel notion.

  • Well Done

    LOL this is how Islam does its thing. Nothing new here. Been doing it since about 635 A.D. There is NO WAY the bureaucrats and officials do not know this. They MUST know this. So, what do you think these men are doing to Western Civilization? It would seem the hard left feminist dimwits want women to have to dress as pictured above.

  • BagLady

    What difference, Hispanic, Muslim, African. The poor are flocking to the safe havens and you can’t blame them. The fact that they’re having so many kids is a traditional thing born out of necessity (a percentage will die early) and will right itself in time and conform to their adopted culture. However, as far as Britain is concerned it’s too late. They have turned the tide forever and the country has lost its identity to multiculturalism. You have to go deeper and deeper into the countryside to find ‘England’.

    • Njed

      If there are enough places where it is traditional to have many kids because of high infant and child mortality and these places exist long enough, they will swamp every other place in the world.

      There will be no place without their culture and others cultures will disappear. The whole planet will be overcrowded and new dynamics will come into play. You assume it will settle out and everything will be okay.

      I do blame them. We’ve been giving aid for 3 generations/ 60 years.

      • BagLady

        Ah yes, the elusive ‘Aid’. Where does it all go? $billions every year from all over the developed world to the hungry in the third world. India has told Britain that it doesn’t need its handouts but Britain insists upon it. I believe that in western countries it is illegal to use bribery as a means to an ends so how to do business in, say, India? Nothing happens there without backsheesh and I reckon Aid gets around this problem very nicely. In any event, the Aid money works its way back home, bypassing the tax payer who donated it in the first place. Just another money laundering method.

        How is Africa doing with the benefits of all this eco-tax now being collected in $billions? I’ll give you an example:

        (Lord?) Joe Bloggs Forestry, UK Ltd, somehow manages to get hold of a swathe of land in Africa with the British government. The goat herding gatherers dwelling on the plot are driven off with the aid of the African government (they have no papers to prove ownership) and replaced with a forest of fast growing trees. The British government then hands (Lord?) Joe many $thousands each year for his part in cleansing the atmosphere. Once the trees reach full size, he chops them down and sells them, replanting once more to continue his bit for mankind. The goat herders are hungry, so they trot off to the gold plated streets of London.

        Wouldn’t it have been better if “Aid” had been used to provide the villagers with the forest and pay them out of the eco-taxes for cleansing our planet?

        • Njed

          Yes a lefty business and moral model.

          Plant trees for global warming subsidized by the tax payer at the behest of a voter bloc to which bag lady belongs. You approve of it.

          When I was an expat brat growing up, the evil multinational company my parent worked did no such thing. The multinational set up an subsidiary in a foreign country which had to be 51% owned by locals and the work force had to be locals. So Americans or other foreigners would work there but they would train their replacement.

          Today the subsidiary and the parent company have an exchange program. An American works fora few years in their country and one of their expats works in America.

          Of course this was all happening before the hippies and the yippies got into power and made laws. No imperialism to see here move on. Yeah that means you grow up.

          • BagLady

            Kindly keep you assumptions about my personality to yourself. Is it so difficult to stay objective on this site? My dad was an oil man and I an ex-pat brat. What does that prove? Nada!

          • DB1954

            Note the reflexive use of a “furin” word, “nada.” A statement of her solidarity with oppressed Spaniards–the world over.

        • DB1954

          Oh so, THAT’s how it works? Even so, it does seem to me that Lord Joe’s business in Africa is essentially a statist–dare I say–socialist enterprise. If Lord Joe’s tree business had been in operation back in the bad old days of “capitalism” and empire–well, it wouldn’t have existed because governments in those days weren’t in the business of do-gooding, and the “capitalists” certainly weren’t either. If this is your example of “capitalism” which proves the “undeniable” historical guilt of the heterosexual, Anglo-Saxon male, it’s not really very accurate.

          • BagLady

            I have not pigeon holed this practice to one party or the other. Whichever side of the tracks has been in power, the pillage of Africa et al has always been there. You seem to suggest that cronyism, nepotism and blatant fraud is the purview of one side and not the other. I see a political animal that switches sides for personal gain; talks the talk but walks with the swagger of Wall Street.

            I am happy to move on to the destruction of education both sides of the pond with the advent of the Academy system. What a wonderful opportunity for cronies to cash in. So long as they donate to the Party currently in power, they stand to turn a $2million dollar investment into a controlling $25million share in an industry that gives them total access to the pot: freedom to run up outrageous expenses and freedom to employ self, wife, mother, brother, sister etc etc as ‘consultants’, (provided they do so ‘at arms length’ via their off-shore paper companies of course). It’s all within the rules you see and no politician is going to mess with such a lucrative set-up. Would you?

          • BagLady

            Oh, and by the way, I see in Britain that the $2million investment in ‘education’ has a knock on effect, in that as a political financial supporter you then get the option on another few hundred schools. Let’s do the math(s) $25million times X minus $2million times X.

            The effect is exactly the same on these people as it is with people who win on a scratch card: $millions land in their laps and they just can’t handle it.

          • BagLady

            Funnily enough, I am watching BBC LifeStyle. Perhaps you can’t get this station in your area but, if you like food and DIY then this is a good place. At the moment, we are looking at beautiful old red-brick post-war village schools. They have been sold off, converted to homes and now command $$$s in the private sector. In a growing population, do we really improve a nation’s education by selling off our schools?

          • DB1954

            Where did I mention in my immediately prior post anything about political parties, either in the UK or in the US? Answer: I didn’t. Not even remotely. As for the “pillage” of Africa, I don’t know if you’re aware of this fact or not but it was actually the Belgians who did the most damage in Africa back around the turn of the 20th century. In fact, it was a number of British reformers inside and outside the government who demanded change from the Belgian King Leopold, and got it only after years of struggle and millions of African dead. Read King Leopold’s Ghost by Adam Hochschild for more info.

            I have, quite frankly, no idea what you’re talking about when it comes to your allegations of present-day “exploitation” by British industries of 3rd world nations. I suspect that is because YOU have no idea what you’re talking about, but in any case, I get the feeling that you think the year is 1845, and the British Navy is helping British drug merchants sell and promote opium usage in China. It’s almost creepy. Say, are you Edward Said, come back to life?

            3rd: You know absolutely NOTHING about the education system here in the U.S. We don’t have any private academy or academy system ruining what we call our “public schools.” Our public schools are more aptly named government schools, and to put it bluntly and crudely they SUCK. They suck because they’re GOVERNMENT schools. That’s because those who teach in our government schools are mostly dimwits and losers who get into education because they can’t hold a real job. They don’t have the brains to pass substantive courses in college, so they get education degrees where they’re not expected to learn anything difficult, but they expect to have a government sinecure for life, and all benefits.In short, over here, it’s the government schools and the teachers’ unions that are the problem. Not the other way around. If you didn’t know that about us, you know, as I said, NOTHING about the U.S. You couldn’t find one in a hundred Americans who will tell you anything different about American public schools than I have. I know teachers who have sent their children to private schools because they know how God-awful public schools are in this country. You want to turn your kid into a drug addict, see your daughter raped, or turn your kid into a racist? oh just send him or her to an American public school so your dreams can come true! lmbo @ your ignorance :-D

          • BagLady

            ‘I make no claim to know your education system. I was speaking of the Academy system pushed through by Blair & Co. The loopholes allow for the usual snouts in trough by those close to the purse. The only connection with the US is that Academies are structured the same as your Charter schools. You do have those, don’t you?

          • BagLady

            I wasn’t aware that we were speaking of capitalism. We were discussing Aid and its many uses. I presume both sides milk it equally.

      • BagLady

        I peruse the various parts of the world shown on the population map and, in each case, the picture is different from the one you paint:
        http://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/world-population-pyramid

        • BagLady

          and, apropos of nothing, you must admit that the perfect population model resembles a woman in a red burka.

          • Tnajal

            If 1.5 billion Muslims represent 6 to 7 billion people then you are correct.

            But you statement seems to be more of projecting your world view or defeatism.

          • BagLady

            I’m commenting on the population graphs and your post makes no sense

          • DB1954

            These zombies are dressed in purple burkas, and actually, the perfect population model would be a woman “of color” NOT wearing a burka of any color.

          • BagLady

            I see not a one of you lazy people bothered to peruse the population map and draw the obvious conclusions. Unless you have nothing to add to the obvious information therein, then I shall desist from conversing with you.

          • DB1954

            I’m not looking at your stupid map, Baggie, that’s because I don’t use maps or trust information I get from leftwing sources. That would be you and/or the BBC. You can desist as you wish. That’s not my choice or concern.

          • BagLady

            You obviously went to one of those public schools you hate so much.

          • DB1954

            How obvious is it? I ask because you don’t know me from Adam, uh … obviously. The only thing that’s obvious here is that you’re yet another neo-Marxist moron, a delusional, narcissistic, left-wing-nut and elitist who hates her own country. By the way, you can start desisting anytime now. That’ll suit me just fine.

    • Drakken

      Then let the war begin!

      • BagLady

        Are you ranting in your sleep, or is this in response to anything in particular? ……. In general?

        • D

          No you missed the whole thing about where Muslims get enough number they will enact dhimmitude on non-Muslims or start a civil war.

          You seem good with ignoring this whole fact, so you are a self hating Leftists or a Muslim.

        • Drakken

          A little slow on the uptake there cupcake.

    • Lambert

      Why the name bag lady?

      Do you want to be a bad lady?
      Have you been a bag lady?
      Do you commiserate with bag ladies?

      If you commiserate with bag ladies what do you do about besides taking it as an appellation? Do you work with charities? Would you work with Christian or Jewish charities to help the poor or would that be beyond the pale for you?

      • BagLady

        I shan’t butt in with any answers answer since you seem to be in a conversation with yourself.

        • Lambert

          No most people pick a name that they think is cool, fits them inn small part due to life experiences or to make a statement. I think you are the latter.

          Of course it is a lefty political statement about how mean and rotten the Western World is.

          • DB1954

            I think Bag Lady chose her name because it serves to describe her feelings of guilt and self-loathing for all those crimes against humanity her great-great grandfather engaged in when he was the 8th Earl of Sandwish or something. She’s probably mega-rich, some kind of major nobility with title and all that stuff. The “Bag lady” moniker represents both her liberal guilt and that morbid fascination with existentialism she never let go of when she studied at Oxford or Cambridge back in the 60′s. In all probability, she tried to give away her family wealth and live on the meager income provided by her book sales, but she found she couldn’t do that because her father had her declared legally insane. Am I wrong? Hmm?

        • DB1954

          That was perfectly snippy and unnecessary. Seems your nose got out of joint so unexpectedly. BTW, we don’t use or hear the word “shan’t” too often, just maybe when someone’s putting on airs as we, the Lumpenproletariat, who cling to our guns and religion say.

      • SCREW SOCIALISM

        She’s really Miss Piggy.

      • DB1954

        She just always secretly wanted to be a Bag Lady, actually she’s the Duchess of Sillyingham. Quite wealthy, but insane. She converted to Islam several years ago as a “statement” against her own family’s racism, sexism, homophobia, and centuries old oppression of the “peoples” of the world. and the fact that the whole damn family is white and rich.

    • DB1954

      No, you’re wrong about the population thing. The Muslims come to Britain because they know they won’t be killed and their children won’t die in the next warlord’s campaign of ethnic, religious, or tribal slaughter.To be middle class is why they come, but it has no effect on religious Muslims. They will not limit the size of their families precisely because they are religious Muslims. There’s no mention of birth control in the Koran. Further, there’s certainly no mention of women’s rights or any notion that a “respectable woman” could be anything other than barefoot and pregnant for 20 to 40 years.

    • DB1954

      And you can’t blame native Britons who resist the invasion or who blame liberal morons like you.

  • Nic_223

    The UK is a class society the elites hate democracy especially the popular kind (they do everywhere but esp in the UK).They look with envy at the Islamic dictatorships in the Gulf the kleptocratic kings and princes they installed back after WW1 is something they want to see in the UK (and Europe and the world). As such an increased Muslim population is viewed as hastening back to the day of absolute rule by monarchs and non of this democratic human rights,gender equality, nonsense.One can think of ways to halt the tide only when one is convinced there is a need to halt it in the UK it is very far removed though popular sentiment is clearly increasingly aware of the danger of Islam.

  • Veracious_one

    Muslim immigration will doom the UK in another decade to either the Muslim genocide of the native population or an ongoing civil war like in Lebanon, Syria, Yemen and Iraq.
    absolutely!!!!!

    • Drakken

      You will have a very uncivil war inside of a couple years, not 10.

      • DB1954

        They might have avoided it, had someone heeded the warnings.

    • DB1954

      That’s only IF native Britons fight them. Seems they are presently not inclined to fight back, thanks to their surrender monkey political leaders.

  • defcon 4

    WRT the picture — it’s kinda like Halloween and everyone chose to go as ghosts.

    • DB1954

      I was thinking more like zombies from the Night of the Living Dead..

  • Aizeta

    During cold
    war marxists inoculated western youth with the ‘selfishness virus’, the
    resulting generation lacked the ‘generosity’ to reproduce themselves. Now we
    live in a nightmare of graying progressives with no kids and fast reproducing
    third worldies. And if by chance they had offsprings, they were meant to be a
    statement to the world more than real people. In any case, it was easier to
    import some Chinese babies (it is so not racist) than going through pregnancy
    and labour.

    • Rossetta

      Even better import a Chinese woman, marry her, jointly raise conservative kids.

      The woman brainwashed by the left is left wandering why no one visits her in the old folks home, why there is no one to keeping tabs on the nursing home staff to prevent them from neglecting her, and why good Democrats on the Death Panels want to euthanize her at 74.

      Meanwhile the conservative Chinese import is raising her biracial offspring with nary a though to multiculturalism, brought them up to be successful, and mothered them enough that they look after her interests in her golden years.

      • DB1954

        Yes, Chinese … yes, what a great idea … Chinese … hmm …

        • BagLady

          Ha ha, ha, ha, ha …. please think of my sides.

          I’d settle for the kids knowing where a carrot comes from and, in many cases, what it looks like.

          • DB1954

            What you’d settle for is BEING a frickin’ carrott.

          • BagLady

            and what pray, is a carrott?

      • BagLady

        The same treatment is being meted out in old folk’s homes and hospitals in Britain and they have a right wing government, so it doesn’t seem to matter which side of the fence you sit.

        • DB1954

          Britain has a right wing government. hahahaha “please, think of my sides.”

  • SCREW SOCIALISM

    The UK is toast.

    Socialism destroyed the UK.

    • BagLady

      Then why is the right doing everything in its power to make things worse?