$100 Mil Hillary: Republicans Hate Me Because I’m Opposed to Income Inequality

Hillary Rodham Clinto

Those darn Republicans. They just hate the $100 million proletarian working class that is not “truly well off” and got there through hard work.

Clinton was asked whether she could be a credible champion for fighting income inequality in the United States despite her wealth.

“But they don’t see me as part of the problem,” she told the paper, “because we pay ordinary income tax, unlike a lot of people who are truly well off, not to name names; and we’ve done it through dint of hard work.”

At $100 mil, the Clintons aren’t “truly well off”. They don’t even have a billion. And by hard work, Hillary means putting her name on books someone else wrote and delivering speeches someone else wrote.

So why do Republicans hate her? Because of her stand on income inequality. Obviously.

Why does she think that she, like Bill before her, is such a lightning rod for conservative hostility?

“It started with the visceral negative reaction towards my husband’s success. Because I am outspoken about inequality and economic opportunity, they transferred a lot of that feeling to me.”

Sure. Conservatives hate Hillary because of her crusade against inequality.

I don’t recall Hillary having all that much to say about income inequality before it became fashionable, aside from the obligatory boiletplate stuff, which is all she’s really doing now also, but Hillary says that’s why conservatives hate her.

So it must be true. Because she never lies, except when she’s falsely accusing a 12-year-old girl who was raped and beaten into a coma of being a mentally ill slut.

And that just means she was a really good lawyer.

But at least the Clintons are generous to the less fortunate. And by less fortunate, they mean themselves.

The Clintons paid $33.8 million in federal taxes and claimed deductions for $10.2 million in charitable contributions. The contributions went to a family foundation run by the Clintons that has given away only about half of the money they put into it, and most of that was last year, after Mrs. Clinton declared her candidacy.

The key job of the Clinton Foundation is… promoting the Clintons. Its employees include Chelsea Clinton.

This is why conservatives hate the Clintons. This is also why liberals hate the Clintons. It must be a vast right-left conspiracy.

  • Ban Liberals

    In other words, she’s FOR giving your money to someone else.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      preferably her

      • JackSpratt

        Or people who will vote for her.

      • tagalog

        My guess is that she’d just as soon be in charge of allocating it.

        • Daniel Greenfield

          she has been for a while

          • tagalog

            Not now, and not as Secretary of State. But as President, ah…

    • Douglas J. Bender

      That makes her a very FORgiving person, I suppose.

  • 4arepublic

    Hillary the panderer:


    Hillary on the Sadam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction:

    “In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security.” — Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002

    Hillary on four Americans murdered by terrorists in Benghazi:


    Had enough Hillary?

  • DogmaelJones1

    In a clean, well-preserved republic of free men, the dregs float naturally, because of gravity, to the bottom of such a society. In a welfare state, crony-run and crony-corrupted “democracy” such as ours, the dregs rise naturally, because of a political vacuum, to the top. And the scum is what everyone sees.

  • truebearing

    “It must be a vast right-left conspiracy.”

    Ang growing every day. Being seriously paranoid may actually be justified in the case of someone as universally loathable as Hillary Clinton.

    Another mental patient for president. Hillary has completely deluded herself into believing she is entitled to the presidency, with encouragement from Bill, who will do anything to get back in front of the camera.

    Hillary is so competitive and obsessed with power that her paltry 100 million dollars seems insignificant to the billions that Soros has swindled people out of.

  • JackSpratt

    I hate her because she’s corrupt, a liar and a communist. Not to speak of being an old hag. She believes in forced income equality. She believes in redistribution of wealth, and is a socialist. Like Obozo she’s a Saul Alinsky acolyte. Chicago marxist, Saul Alinsky, of Rules for Radicals fame…dedicated to Satin. Although she was actually active during Alinsky’s time, and even worked for him. The Hildabeast wrote her college thesis extolling the “virtues” of Alinsky and marxism.


      Satin Doll.

  • gman213

    I could only hope to have a year where earned enough money to owe $33.8 million dollars in taxes. Please…just once let it happen to me.


      Win the Lottery.

  • Bob

    I have news for Hillary. she is a part of the problem, a big part of it. She needs to drop back into the hole she crawled out of and pull the dirt in after her.

  • sheikyermami

    The Klintoons are despicable. They have stolen everything they could steal and lied, betrayed and deceived everyone they came across in their pathetic careers. Are the Obama’s worse? Probably. But who will bring them to justice?

    • Wolfthatknowsall

      It had better happen before Hillary gets the White House. And this brings up the question of why Obama would allow Holder to go after her? After all, if she gets her Attorney-General, she would likely go after Obama, in retaliation.

  • tagalog

    Oh, I bet Republicans dislike Hillary Clinton for many more reasons than just that she’s opposed to income inequality.

  • Wolfthatknowsall

    Well- and truly-stated, Daniel. That, from a certified member of Vast Rightwing Conspiracy …

  • tagalog

    A society where incomes are equal will never exist, but if it did, it could only exist through government coercion, a technique that would insure that the equality of income would be at a very low income indeed and would eliminate the desire of people to rise in income through their hard work, innovation, and creativity.

    I have to admit that it might solve the problem of illegal immigrants coming here for the money, though. Although the cure seems a heck of a lot worse than the illness.