765 Voted in North Carolina and Another State in 2012

wtcp122_s640x427

Voter fraud is an imaginary problem. Especially in North Carolina where some rather suspicious results have come up.

765 voters with an exact match of first and last name, DOB and last four digits of SSN were registered in N.C. and another state and voted in N.C. and the other state in the 2012 general election.

35,750 voters with the same first and last name and DOB were registered in N.C. and another state and voted in both states in the 2012 general election.

155,692 voters with the same first and last name, DOB and last four digits of SSN were registered in N.C. and another state – and the latest date of registration or voter activity did not take place within N.C.

We aren’t talking about a little voter fraud here. If even a fraction of these coincidences turn out to be voter fraud, we are talking about sizable numbers here.

Romney won North Carolina in 2012 by only 92,000 votes. Obama won it in 2008 by 14,000 votes. Easily within the possible margins of fraud we’re looking at here.

  • A Z

    765 < 14,000 so Democrats will say it did not affect the election.

    But if it is like drug seizures by the border patrol and the coast guard

    If how many illegals are caught by border patrol every year than the problem is up to 10X worse and is the same "order of magnitude" as the number Obama won by.

    I certainly believe the governor Gregoire won in Washington state by illegal votes and Senator Al Franken won by illegal votes and vote stuffing.

    • A Z

      I thought the Number of crossers was about 33%. Maybe it was several years ago. However the Obama admin lies about many things such as unemployment & CPI.

      “Last year, the Border Patrol caught about 356,000 immigrants trying to cross illegally at the U.S.-Mexico border. That’s thought to be about HALF of all attempts”

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/06/02/whos-crossing-the-mexico-border-a-new-survey-tries-to-find-out/

      “But when the CFR analysts crunched numbers from migrant surveys and the Department of Homeland Security, their estimates were that only 40 to 55 percent had been caught.”

      http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2013/0514/Are-border-security-measures-working-Why-the-answer-is-elusive

      The Republican-led House Oversight and Government Reform Committee last year sought similar data from the Homeland Security Department as part of an investigation into allegations that officials had released “false and misleading border crossing data” that understated the volume of gotaway

      https://www.truthdig.com/report/page3/new_drone_radar_reveals_border_patrol_gotaways_in_high_numbers_20130411

    • JackSpratt

      You’d better read the article again!

      • A Z

        The # 765 is not the same order of magnitude as 14,000. you have to argue everything with liberals. When you prove your point by proving everything to the last iota, they will pull a Vizinni and say “Look over there!”.

        But you point is well taken. 35,000 other matches is the same order of magnitude as 14,000 and 2X as large.

    • NAHALKIDES

      Of course if it’s between 35,000 and 155,000, which is possible, there’s no doubt it could affect the outcome in NC.

      And I think there’s no doubt about the examples you cite – Gregoire in Washington and Franken in Minnesota – the Democrats stole those elections.

      • JackSpratt

        MN’s Secretary of State is one of Soros’ boys.

  • onecornpone

    At last we have real data to back up the suspicion that the 2012 election may have been heavily tampered, but what good will it do at this late date? It’s not like our pols show much concern about past or future voter fraud.

    Now I wonder how many voted in more than two locations? I suppose the only way to control this practice is with computerized voter registration cards. That probably wouldn’t stop voter fraud, but it might make it more difficult for the perps.

    • TexasStomp

      Just a thought but it wouldn’t kill states to maintain current voter rolls. Most just send out the new cards each year instead of having people request them. When FL redid their rolls it was the first time they had been culled in 50 years! Ridiculous. Election officials are paid. They need to do more than open polls every two years.

      Start with laws requiring a minimum of updating…in person…at the polls…with proof of identity. Anyone left on the books gets a letter to re-register and gets “suspended” until they do. That wouldn’t be too difficult and it would keep the rolls cleared out. Pure laziness that states don’t do this as a matter of course.

      • onecornpone

        Yep, last year my local tax accessor/ collector spent quite a chunk of time combing through the voter roles of our county of 8 K citizens. I didn’t bother asking how long it had been since the last big flush. Imagine the effort required to do that in a county of the population of D/FW?

        IMO “motor/voter” was the beginning of voter reg’s going off the rails.

        Putting the responsibility on the interested, involved citizen to register is the correct way to go. Those who need special dispensation don’t need to be voting anyway.

        • TexasStomp

          Up in Alpine they had the poll at the registration office so you got in one line, registered or updated, then went over to vote, lol.

          We have 2 years till the next presidential. If states can’t figure out how to do it in that amt of time then new elections laws need to be passed. It’s ridiculous. The census bureau and IRS can find anyone they want to. Why can’t cities and states do the same? A cross check of the DMV outta be the first stop and then the county tax office. Between those two you’d probably find 90% of them. And the Girl Scouts made a fortune sitting at grocery stores and malls. Go where the people go.

      • NAHALKIDES

        Not just pure laziness – remember, Eric Holder is bringing the full force of the DOJ down on those states that even try to purge their rolls of illegal voters.

        • TexasStomp

          True enough but it didn’t work in Florida or at least that was what we were told…by the media so take that for what it’s worth.

          • Mike

            It DID work in Florida! Everyone says Florida uses Paper so it cant happen. BULL! They can STUFF ballot Boxes and stuff them with absentee and provisional Ballots!

            There is ONLY ONE WAY to Ensure a totally Clean election and I have figured it out!!

            How to make CERTAIN Presidential Elections are not rigged….

            We should ONLY have paper ballots and two counters from each party and an overseer at every voting location. Picked by the representation from the party committee in every area.

            All counters names should be sent to a central location where an appointed member of the DNC and RNC both have access to different computers in a program tha…t neither can change. All counters should have to count separately then seal their count with an official seal. Then once all have counted they all write their counts on a sheet of paper and all hold them up for the overseer. IF all are the same they submit totals by calling the totals into the computers that the DNC and RNC have access to.
            This way if there is any discrepancy the people who counted know and so do the heads of the RNC and DNC or their appointees. Also the counters then Mail their sealed counts to a specific place of government where the totals will be counted by someone appointed by the DNC and RNC together to see that the sealed counts match the votes that were submitted online.
            The DNC and RNC count them without the other in the room.
            IF both of their totals match then the election results are confirmed.

            NO CHEATING POSSIBLE THIS WAY!!

            Screw Technology in voting when it comes to Elections! Of course except for the computers so that we can get the quick count for election day.

            The reason for the computer call in and the sending of the tallies sealed is so that no one can stuff ballot boxes or remove them!!

          • TexasStomp

            Hey you get no argument from me. Sounds like a plan. I have no reason to criticize any idea that will help clean up elections. They’re a disgrace as is the way many states handle absentee ballots from our Military serving overseas. They’ve lost, accidentally shredded, or tossed out more than they’ve counted and they get fined every election for doing so but it NEVER stops them from doing it again and again.

        • JackSpratt

          Holder even demanded they not remove dead people from the rolls. The democraps fight ‘Voter ID’ tooth and nail, they really depend on their media running interference for them to keep the lid on their criminality.

      • Canadensis

        Quite the easy solution. Anyone who files a tax return gets on the voter registration. Everyone, no matter what income, has to file. You don’t file, you don’t vote…and the registration updates itself annually at no extra expense.

  • Josh Randall

    Anyone who doesn’t think Obama stole both elections is a fool. Look at the creeps that run and hang around polling places. I do recommend that people stay with the paper ballot over the electronic one.

    • CaoMoo

      No only Bush steals elections. Bad Florida Bad! /sarc

  • JackSpratt

    First the democraps pushed through ‘Motor Voter’. They’ve been working on getting illegals driver’s licenses. Then they pushed through ‘The Provisionary Ballot’, which allows them to vote in as many voting places as they can make on election day. The ‘Provisionary Ballot’ is a perfect gimmick for a political party invested in vote fraud. We’ve known since 2000 the dems have been stealing and trying to steal elections. We found out after the 2000 election from democrap operatives, who admitted that they had stolen elections from republicans in the past, using the hanging ‘chad’ method (specifically in commiefornia). They are so vehement about changing this nation to a socialist/marxist system that they are more than willing to destroy the sanctity of one of our most precious and cherished freedoms in order to achieve it. With them, the ends justify the means, always. It is their modus operandi.

  • Mike

    The ONLY way to be certain that Presidential elections are not rigged. If any Democrat is against this method then they are for the possibility of rigged elections and against a guaranteed FAIR election….

    How to make CERTAIN Presidential Elections are not rigged….

    We should ONLY have paper ballots and two counters from each party and an overseer at every voting location. Picked by the representation from the party committee in every area.

    All counters names should be sent to a central location where an appointed member of the DNC and RNC both have access to different computers in a program tha…t neither can change. All counters should have to count separately then seal their count with an official seal. Then once all have counted they all write their counts on a sheet of paper and all hold them up for the overseer. IF all are the same they submit totals by calling the totals into the computers that the DNC and RNC have access to.
    This way if there is any discrepancy the people who counted know and so do the heads of the RNC and DNC or their appointees. Also the counters then Mail their sealed counts to a specific place of government where the totals will be counted by someone appointed by the DNC and RNC together to see that the sealed counts match the votes that were submitted online.
    The DNC and RNC count them without the other in the room.
    IF both of their totals match then the election results are confirmed.

    NO CHEATING POSSIBLE THIS WAY!!

    Screw Technology in voting when it comes to Elections! Of course except for the computers so that we can get the quick count for election day.

    The reason for the computer call in and the sending of the tallies sealed is so that no one can stuff ballot boxes or remove them!!