Arab Winter Comes to America

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. He is completing a book on the international challenges America faces in the 21st century.


khTo order “Arab Winter Comes to America: The Truth About the War We’re In,” click here.

Robert Spencer will be speaking at the Freedom Center’s Wednesday Morning Club in Los Angeles on Monday, May 12, 2014. For more info, click here.

It may be warm outside now, but from colder hearts a winter blizzard is blowing. These cold hearts are frozen in the endless winter of Islam that leaves them empty of mercy for even their own daughters.

The title of Robert Spencer’s new book, “Arab Winter Comes to America: The Truth About the War We’re In” may reference the now infamous Arab Spring, but its focus is more on domestic policy than on foreign policy. This is less of an analysis of what went wrong in Egypt and Tunisia, though that is also addressed, than what has gone wrong with how the United States deals with Islamic terrorism at home.

The problem with Jihad is that we don’t talk about Jihad, as Spencer writes. The first and most effective wave of the Jihad was a political assault by Muslim Brotherhood front groups such as ISNA and CAIR against even discussing the threat. When the next wave of terrorist attacks arrived, policymakers, soldiers and law enforcement officers were left blinded and censored.

Today the situation is worse than ever.

Arab Winter Comes to America is less about the past than the present, less about lands abroad than our own streets and cities. The Arab Spring cracked regimes that had sought a middle ground between the unfettered savagery of Islamic law and the modern world. The Arab Winter may take longer to crack the West which is trying to walk the same fine line, suppressing blasphemy against Islam as hate crimes and silencing criticism of Islam as Islamophobia, but the book suggests that it can and it will.

Robert Spencer, a scholar of all things Islamic, dwells less on the texts than on the failure of our own establishment to draw the right conclusions from them. Having faced personal censorship in the US and the UK by governments that should instead have been listening to him, he is ably positioned to describe the process by which groups linked to terrorism preemptively silence those scholars and experts who would denounce them for what they are while using the threat of youth “radicalization” as blackmail.

“The only people who have perfect clarify about who they are and what they hope to accomplish, are America’s foes,” Spencer writes regretfully.

From Nidal Hasan to the Boston Marathon bombings, Arab Winter Comes to America examines wasted opportunities and missed warnings that could have prevented the mass murder of Americans. And even as Obama and his advisers claim that Al Qaeda has been all but defeated, Spencer warns that the real struggle between our civilization and the medieval terror theocracy out of the desert is only beginning.

The Arab Spring was a political and military disaster, but if the Arab Winter of Islam spreads to the West, it could destroy civilization as we know it.

“The jihad attack in Boston shows that our future in this country could be just as bloody as the present of the Muslim world,” Spencer writes, linking together the spring violence in Tunisia, Syria and Egypt and the spring massacre of Americans by Muslim infiltrators in Boston.

“The ideology behind the Boston Marathon bombing was the same ideology ascendant in the Arab Spring uprisings,” he adds.”It is no different from the ideology that motivated a Muslim U.S. Army psychiatrist to slaughter thirteen Americans at Fort Hood… it is identical to the belief system that inspired the 9/11 hijackers.”

Islamic violence is a matter of critical mass. The Islamic violence of the Arab Spring was a Jihad of Muslim majorities while the Islamic violence in Boston and in New York and throughout the West is a Jihad of Muslim minorities. However as we study the changing demographic patterns in the West, it is not inconceivable that we too may one day face the violence of Muslim majorities in our own countries.

Spencer demonstrates that while the violence of Muslim majorities and Muslim minorities may differ in scale and tactics, they originate from the same set of religious impulses. The Jihadists in Cairo and Benghazi, in Boston and New York, may have utilized different tactics of terror, but they believed the same things. And it is this belief that unites them into an army, even when scattered into cells or acting in isolation as lone wolves. It is this violent belief that is being hurled against the ramparts of the West.

Arab Winter Comes to America explores the intersections between propaganda and terror, how supposedly non-violent Islamic groups work to clear the path for their violent cousins and how the Muslim Brotherhood, which took over entire countries after the Arab Spring, embedded its front groups into American political life and is plotting to do the same thing here.

From the UK to the US, Spencer takes us on a dark journey along a river of denial that flows out of the houses of government and through the columns and broadcasts of mainstream media reporters. This river may be far from the waters of the Nile and yet it moves unknowingly to the same current, the tide of bloody genocidal dreams from murderous monsters like Hassan al-Banna and Yusuf al-Qaradawi.

Arab Winter Comes to America warns that understanding the motives that drive our enemies may be our first line of defense.  It argues that we cannot begin to fight a war against the enemy that has brought savage carnage into our skies and our cities until we understand his goals and ambitions.

Ideological wars do not begin on the battlefield though they may end there. They are fought in the hearts and minds of men. Arab Winter Comes to America is another contribution to the Counterjihad which Robert Spencer has been fighting for so long. It is not a war that any of us has chosen, but it is a war that we have faced for over a thousand years. And it is not going away any time soon.

The weather outside may carry the warmth of a balmy spring, but as long as a cold wind blows out of the desert where Islam was born, it will continue to freeze souls and minds and whenever a bomb goes off or a Muslim kills in the name of Islam, a chilly strand of that wind blows through our hearts.

This is the oldest war there is; the war between civilization and savagery, between the power of truth and the tyranny of the lie, and between the free man and the vicious slave.

As Robert Spencer writes, “The truth cannot be successfully obscured and bringing it to light is essential to the survival of this free republic.”

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.  

Subscribe to Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, and LIKE it on Facebook.

  • Michael Copeland

    Robert Spencer supplies the dots to connect: the state tries to withdraw them.
    See “A Triple Unsolved Murder: Unconnected Dots” http://www.LibertyGB.org.uk.

    The self-imposed censorship of criticism of Islam is accompanied by
    compulsory whitewashing of all things Islamic: that is what Political
    Correctness has accomplished, even to the extent of (criminally) tampering with
    evidence. A Fort Hood soldier who took cell phone footage of Nidal Hasan’s jihad murder rampage was ORDERED by his superior to delete it. That is what this
    madness has led to.
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/oct/15/soldier-says-he-was-ordered-delete-fort-hood-video/

    • Michael Copeland

      Should be “RS supplies the dots: the state withdraws them”

    • chris heath

      Please, it was not jihad murder rampage, it was stress related, accident at work (or so they would have us believe). Its the amount of effort to create sheer nonsense out of Islamic carnage that gets me.

      • kikorikid

        The Totalitarian nature of Shariah Compliance
        requires bending over backwards and turning
        inside-out in order to comply. That is what Obama does.

  • truebearing

    The entire West owes Robert Spencer a great deal for his courageous, relentless, exposure of the true nature and intent of Islam. Instead, the “leadership” in nation after nation tries to silence him. Such is the consequence of being a prophet. The consequences of cowardice and ignoring a prophet are far worse. The West is on a catastrophic course, led by fools wearing the blinders of political correctness, a pernicious pseudo-morality that demonizes thruth and elevates acceptance over survival.

    Islam would be powerless without the Left paving its way, enabling access to even to the highest levels of law enforcement and our intelligence agencies. The Left is Islam’s accomplice, starting with Obama, Holder, and Kerry — and Hillary before him. Obama is particularly loyal to Islam, and hostile to Judaism and Christianity. He is salting this nation with tens of thousands of future terrorists. Obama is the Meccan Horse.

    • Myrtle Linder

      Far too many of us who do not agree with Muslims, but are so blind we are allowing them to confiscate the country, change our laws,to suit them, put our Savior down, ,just swallow it whole, we sit back and say nothing and do nothing, except maybe call those who care and are working against it, call us who know and care, fanatics. Millions appear to not have a clue to what is going on against America, in America.

    • http://www.clarespark.com/ Clare Spark

      Liberal elites invented the notion of political correctness and hate speech. If you consider these Democrat warhorses to be the Left, I suppose I agree with you. But I see them as “the moderate men” and as “centrists.” Here is my view of their politics, and how some rightists view them: http://clarespark.com/2013/06/30/the-origins-of-political-correctness-2/. I wrote two blogs on the problem and recommend both if you haven’t seen them already.

    • bigjulie

      Well said and true! We do not have much more time before actions required to stem the Islamist take-over become violent and bloody here, as they have in every other country where they have been allowed a foot hold, mostly by foolish Leftists who somehow think that Islam will spare them as a return of the favor extended.
      “Massive, brutal and bloody” is all these people know! It is how they have achieved every gain they have ever made and when the bloom is off the roses offered them by the Left, “Massive, Brutal and Bloody” is what will be visited upon US! Islam intends a complete take-over. They live in peace with no one, not even themselves!

      • Drakken

        Massive, brutal and bloody is how we will return the favor to islam and the leftist that enable this abomination. I say let the muslims keep pushing, for then sooner or later and I am betting on sooner, there will be a straw that breaks the camels back moment, and then as they say, the rest will be history and when in the future when someone asks about the muslims, the reply will be, what muslims?

        • Hktony

          Sadly for Maoist , nazis and other groups they never suffered from breaking the camels back. There will be a point of no return. You see England with the dimmi police not even allowing churchill’s words in public. I hope that the camels back breaks in the uk but they are running out of time before even the mildest comments lead to prison. Civil disobedience maybe too late and only blood can resolve it! A few years ago I was nearly jailed for simply trying to help out during a strike at heathrow airport. The police in the uk are not far removed from the military. Now I guess it’s worse. I stopped my little protest as I really didn’t want to spend the night in a cell! Don’t wait for the camels back to break! We know the danger why wait. No need for violence simply huge group civil disobedience will do the trick. Worked for Gandhi. Or we take the Mandela way and bomb people- something I think would not support. I think spencer with his information and peaceful group action would work! The other choice is to look at all the other countries that were Christian or buddhist and see how the camels back never broke!

          • American Patriot

            England is not a country. England is one of four internal divisions (along with Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland) of the country known as the United Kingdom (or Britain). Calling the UK “England” is offensive to the people of Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, the UK’s three other internal divisions. England and the UK are not synonymous, as the former is part of the latter, just like Maryland is part of the United States and Ontario is part of Canada.

          • Hktony

            The reason also why I said the English police above was that I was referring to the arrest of mr weston in Winchester in England. I would rather you have commented on my content rather than a point of geography.
            And I am English and do know the difference between the different parts. But thank you for pointing it out in case I really was a dork!

          • kikorikid

            First, I’m a Citizen of the United States. Not a colonist.
            Second, The Citizens of England,those Brits, need to
            get their doodoo together or the 12th Caliphate
            will be sitting in London. I’ve heard that the “Working
            Class” Brit is really fatigued with the Leftist-Liberals giving
            near free rein to attempts to impose
            Shariah Compliance. Shame on you! You’ll
            have Rebels at home soon enough! Brilliant! What!

          • Hktony

            Thank you for your response but I don’t understand your point. I never called anyone a colonist. The issue here is the problem of Islam not anyone’s nationality race or creed. The citizens of the uk have a difficult job of getting their stuff together at present because of fear of arrest. The working class are fatigued but the middle class are reluctant to do anything at present to help. From my little contact with the police they are a bunch of bastards. People know that and are not too keen to piss them off. Perhaps the democratically loving Obama and the republicans could send some money to the uk help fight this oppressive govt as they did in Ukraine ?

          • DontMessWithAmerica

            Right on! A call to action. Everybody is prattling but very few DO anything. ACT FOR AMERICA is a group worth supporting. They have chapters in various states and they work hard to introduce legislation to pre-empt Sharia Law. They may be principally responsible for the Special Investigation getting under way on the Benghazi affair. The self-named American Patriot here tries to give you a geography lesson on the part of the U.K. And what is he or she doing to be patriotic? Yes, we need to take to the streets in numbers. Look at what the Egyptians did! 30 Million marched and they ousted Morsi. Where is the Spirit of ’76? Lost in dumb geography lessons?

          • pekin

            Write On, Buddy!! The so called Million Muslim March, my foot, about 24 people showed up…When counter-attacked THEY backed down… We must FIGHT against those that have crept into OUR Government, schools, banking institutions, housing or property sharks,etc! As for Act for America : http://www.actforamerica.org is an excellent organization with 280,000 or so members are DOING a great deal…It’s Founder, Brigitte Gabriel KNOWS Terror, as She escaped Her Beloved Lebanon! You, Sir, are spot on!!

          • pekin

            Feel like FIGHTING?? Join Act for America and FIGHT for Your Nation & Your Lives!

          • Drakken

            The problem with the Gandhi approach is that he never ran into bullets or a bayonet. If ole Gandhi had run up against the Japanese with his nonsense, they would have found his bayoneted and beheaded corpse floating down the Ganges river. The tipping point has been reached, the peoples voices have pretty much been silenced, and now the only thing left will be the sound of rifles, it is now inevitable. A peaceful approach has come and gone.

          • Hktony

            Cannot shoot 10000 people or even arrest that many! The point is to put pressure on the govt., to act in a patriotic way. Even we assume the worst and people do get shot then the protest continue. The world media is watching this must mean something. I don’t believe the military will stab or shoot people in the uk because they know this will result in a civil war. Of course I am guessing but I would think trying a peaceful approach is better than violence!?
            Also many people in the uk still believe Islam is the religion of peace. The tipping point has not been reached because there is insufficient misery amongst the middle class. They are the opinion makers. If the tipping point is reached and they are silent then we are screwed.

      • pekin

        All the more reason that WE THE PEOPLE can NOT surrender OUR arms!! Fight Gun/People CONTROL !

    • Ahumanbeing

      Lol, you’re so silly.

  • RealScholar

    Robert Spencer is a religion hustler. He is a two bit antimuslim racist. He knows nothing about Islam. He is one of worst living human beings ever. He also is a con man, hiding his true identity as an insignificant professional person in an insignifnt religion as meliorate greek catholic of syria. he loves every middle east tyrant who is in the protection business such as protecting his singignifact religious sect,

    • James Foard

      I see by your cognomen, “RealScholar”, that you obviously consider yourself some kind of authority. Robert Spencer has been an international speaker on the issue of Islamic terrorism, conducted seminars, instructed the FBI, police, and civic groups and has authored many excellent books on the subject.
      What, pray tell, are your accomplishments, “RealScholar”? perhaps you should call yourself “RealConman” instead.

      • RealScholar

        Robert Spencer is a deacon in Greek Melikite Catholic sect with following of one: Bashar Assad. Spencer is after money, knows diddly about Islam. He is a hustler who wants to cash in on the antimuslim bandwagon with the extremist jews.

        • 1Indioviejo1

          You may try to attack Robert Spencer but if you had any scholarly knowledge wich you seem to claim,maybe you should consider what St. Thomas Aquinas had to say:
          “He [Mohammed] seduced the people by promises of carnal pleasure … he perverts almost all the testimony of the Old and New Testaments by making them into a fabrication of his own, as can be seen by anyone who examines his law” (Summa Contra Gentiles, Book 1, Chapter 16, Article 4). It should suffice for a low life like you. Go troll someplace else with your tail between your hind legs.

          • pekin

            Excellent quote of St.Thomas Aquinas ;)

        • Wolfthatknowsall

          I see that you not-so-deftly avoided answering Mr. Foard’s question, to you. So, I’ll ask it, again.

          What are your accomplishments as a “real scholar”?

          • Drakken

            If I didn’t know better, I would think that not a real scholar sounds like that traitor Johnny Esposito?

          • Wolfthatknowsall

            I hear you …

        • Bklyn Farmer

          Let me get this straight, you’re saying don’t listen to Robert Spencer because of his religion – really.

        • SCREW SOCIALISM

          Who is more antimuslim than other muslims?

          See Syria where 135,000+ Muslims have killed other Muslims and others.

          The blood flows to satisfy the blood lust of the prophet of satan called mohammed.

      • john spielman

        Dear” Real Scholar”; Obviously your name is a joke. By name calling as you do to Mr Spencer, you have NOTHING to refute Mr him with!

      • Drakken

        Hey now! Larry the Cable Guy is a genius compared to so called real scholar.

    • Ammianus

      Judging from your prose, you should have written in your native Arabic. In that way, Mr. Spencer could then translate it into readable English for the rest of us.

    • Bamaguje

      IDI0T!!

    • Dan Borden

      I have to question your claim of scholarship. Even if we accept your premise regarding Spencer’s motives and character, it does not change the fact he is right on almost every aspect of the primitive cult of Islam. Do you have any rebuttal of his analysis of the Islamists and Salafists? The actual author of the piece we are discussing is Daniel Greenfield. Is he merely a stooge of Spencer, or are his many other essays on the topic just to be disregarded? For a “scholar,” you have very little to say, unless you are an “islamic scholar,” in which case I would congratulate you for being at the top of your field.

    • 1Indioviejo1

      Typical Muslim response to the truth. Islam is such a Satanic construct that its so called prophet, Mohammed, was a pedophile, a rapist, an enslaver, a looter, a murderer. What good has come out of your Satanic Cult? You should be ashamed of your self for standing up for 1,400 years of demonstrable savagery. You people are animals of the lowest kind out of choice, since Islam infects your lowest desires.

      • MLCBLOG

        Exactly!!

    • Daniel Greenfield

      English. Knowing it is a good prerequisite for real scholars.

      • MLCBLOG

        Yes, a good litmus test. Just like if someone wants to wax large about their business knowledge and how we should run our economy, a quick check of their shoes will give them away, especially if you see hippie type sandals!!

    • nomoretraitors

      It’s “people” like you he’s warning us about

    • mollysdad

      Robert Spencer knows more about Islam than Muhammad.

      • realscholar

        Absolutely! He would have invented islam if there were none. In scientific community we call these charlatans!

        • Western Canadian

          You are not a member of the scientific community, or even the human community. Ignorant muslim troll would be your classification.

    • Nakba Mubarak!

      Ding! Muzz on board.

    • iluvisrael

      If he’s so wrong about islam, why do so many islamists want to silence him?? and learn to spell, you putz.

    • truebearing

      RealScholar? I’ve never seen a real scholar who couldn’t spell or punctuate properly, or who spews incoherent nonsense and personal attacks.

      Have another glass of camel urine. I hear it cures inbreeding.

    • Drakken

      Denial ain’t a river in Egypt and I can see a Darwin Award in your very near future and I am not going to shed a tear in the process. You don’t know it yet, but you muslim and leftist sympathizers are going to be on the endangered species list.

    • Johnnie the jew

      Tosspot. I think that about sums your piddly little mentality up freakwit. Real scholar in what? Theology perhaps – the attempted verification of what is essentially and metaphysically BS in the the first place. LOL keep praying to your moon god

    • pekin

      And I suppose You are able to read Arabic ~ TROLL

    • kikorikid

      You are far from being a scholar. You are
      a Leftist ideological Tool who knows no facts but
      simply attack and bully with ad hominum arguments.
      You are part of the problem.

  • Larry H

    ““The only people who have perfect clarify about who they are and what they hope to accomplish, are America’s foes,” Spencer writes regretfully.”

    perfect clarity? A regretful typo?

    • MLCBLOG

      of course it’s a typo

      sorry I started this comment

      learning to let things go

      we are only human, never will be perfect and we all/most of us know it must be a typo…

      I used to feel compelled to correct spelling errors too…..but thankfully prayer and therapy have set me free from this penchant.

  • Kafir911

    This is probably Spencer’s best since it links the Left and its willful blindness or deliberate obfuscation to the threat of Sharia in the West much like the “Unholy Alliance” by David Horowitz did a decade ago. There is some information that has been repeated from his website and by other sources, but it would be a valuable book for anyone just beginning to understand what America is up against.

    It’s unfortunate, however, that his recommendations in the Epilogue such as telling the truth about Islamic jihad, enforcing existing laws, reclassifying Muslim organizations, ending Muslim immigration and reconfiguring our international alliances aren’t likely to happen because of spineless politicians. Therefore, it’s up to the ordinary patriotic citizen make it happen.

    • Drakken

      If the average ordinary American and westerner for that matter, hasn’t gotten it about islam by now, they will not get it until the shooting starts. Those that do understand the threat are ahead of the learning curve and will react accordingly and the smart amongst us will learn quickly and get on board. The slow and dimwitted and the denialist will understand in short order or Darwin will get his due.

  • The Facts

    Mr. Spencer shovels up his failures as an advance warning agency, rebrands them as “missed opportunities” and sandwiches them between cardstock to rake in a few more bucks.

    • Dan Borden

      More obfuscation from an alleged purveyor of “facts.” Which of Spencer’s assertions about the silly cult of Islam and/or the primitive Islamists trying to shove their medieval theology down our throats do you dispute? We understand you may need time to check with your imam for the proper talking points, so we will be patient.

      • The Facts

        Your throat must be outside of you and up an Arab’s arm. I never had a Muslim try to evangelize Islam to me in my life.

        • TienBing

          Really? You’ve obviously never had much contact with serious Muslims.

        • john spielman

          really? please read an article from the UK today on JIHAD WATCH, about a amuslim who interupted a Christian church service and demanded they follow Allah / Satan instead of Christ Jesus!

          • Dan Borden

            John, I am just waiting for a Muzcritter to try this at our Church. Assuming the Muzmuppet would not respond to polite requests to leave, he may find himself a lot closer to old allah than he would like to be.

        • nomoretraitors

          Just wait till they get to be the majority

          • BS77

            This is the real issue…..immigration…perhaps the West has become too stupid, with all the leftist diversity propaganda ….too stupid to survive.
            Like the Trojans , we are opening our gates to our own destruction.

        • RogerDane

          When ‘they’ really try to ‘evangelize’, you will only have a few moments to contemplate ‘that’ AND your life… no single Muslim has to ‘try’ now, our government is doing it for them and we will reap the violence and death that has always followed the ‘institutionalization’ of hate.

        • Dan Borden

          WFT are you babbling about? The article is not about Muzcritters attempting to peacefully evangelize their silly little cult. The article discussed the various ways the Islamists and Salafists are trying to create an environment where they more easily attack advanced and superior people.

        • Maxi

          Take a taxi sometime.

        • iluvisrael

          tell that to the hundreds of kidnapped girls in Nigeria – if you can fine them alive, dumba$$

          • iluvisrael

            that should be ‘find’

        • truebearing

          You write as poorly as the phony scholar. Are you posting during recess?

          • Dan Borden

            Good one…….or does Mommy know he is on Disqus again?

        • Joe The Gentile

          Guys, ‘The Facts’ is a troll who trolls frontpagemag. To answer him is to fill the we page with trollfeed. Don’t feed it.

        • Western Canadian

          You must really be pathetic if a muzzie doens’t try to con you….

        • SCREW SOCIALISM

          You don’t get out much – or read for that matter.

      • realschaolar

        Spencer is a first class fascist and an opportunistic one at that. He learned his agit prop tactics from his communist days. When the opportunity presented itself in the aftermath of sept. 11, to make few bucks off of pissed of americans, he joined the turn coat commies such as horowitz. otherwise, he is nobody.

        • Dan Borden

          Again, plenty of character assassination about Spencer, not a WORD about the subject matter. What SPECIFIC disagreements do you have with either Mr. Spencer or Mr. Greenfield about the silly cult of Islam?

        • Western Canadian

          You really should post by a more accurate fake name…. I would suggest realmuslimslimeball. No need to thank me.

        • SCREW SOCIALISM

          Your prophet of satan, called mohammed, was a first class fascist, thief, liar, murderer and cult leader.

          There is a reason when there is a massacre, a plane crash, rapes, kidnapping – that islam is the first suspect.

          Because depraved followers of Islam are too often the culprit.

          • Dan Borden

            Ditto to what Screw Socialism said!! I just hope the Obama social media police don’t locate him.

        • American Patriot

          Look who’s talking! You are a supporter of Islamofascism in the Middle East and around the world.

        • kikorikid

          And you are somebody?
          As is common for a Leftist ideologue
          you have tried to invert the fault you
          are practicing and blame on the opposition.
          It is really low light thinking to think we
          will believe. The Fascist are the Left and
          getting bolder about it on a daily basis.
          Here is a suggestion I’ve been trying to
          pass along. You should Volunteer to help collect all
          the firearms when DHS occupies our Cities.
          You can just hold out your arms and we
          will just stack them up like a cord of wood.
          That way you will know you helped!

        • Wolfthatknowsall

          We will not listen to anything you say until you give us your qualifications to be called a real scholar. All you do is attack, without any substance to your comments.

          However, you did give us a hint about your background. “Turn coat commies”. Horowitz has never hid this fact, and given his reasons in great detail about leaving the Leftist traitors to this nation. Why are you still among them?

    • Wolfthatknowsall

      Jealous?

  • 1Indioviejo1

    Robert Spencer is a paladin to our freedom. My question is, what are our chances? Will we be able to elect a leader who knows about the threat and is ready to lead us to victory over the dark forces of Islam? I can’t see any changes in the American mind set to warrant optimism.

    • carpe diem 36

      we have to make sure all those “leaders” like obama are defeated.

  • Giles Blyzzard

    How can Mr. Spencer be speaking at a Wednesday Morning club on a Monday?
    Seriously, I look forward to reading the book. Mr. Spencer is a true patriot.

  • John Galt III

    Jihadists, Islamists, Peaceful Islam, Religion of Peace, Islam taken over by radicals, what is there to worry about?
    Let’s try this: Stalinists, Trotskyites, Leninists, Maoists, Workers Paradise, “Inordinate fear of Communism” – Jimmy the Peanut.
    Or: Brown Shirts, Waffen SS, Plain old SS, National Socialist German Workers Party, Sturm Abteiling, just give them Austria and Czechoslovakia and everything will be fine.
    All adherents of organizations that hate us, want to kill us, convert us or steal from us. Everything else is bull***t, lies and propaganda.

    • mikeh420

      What if Adolf would have declared N@zism a religion instead of a political party?

      • SoCalMike

        Whether or not he made any formal declaration, NAZISM and NAZIs more or less deified Hitler.

      • pekin

        Excellent point ;)

  • Unc Remus

    Islam is a Plague!

  • William III

    Islam only produces: hate, death, destruction and stupidity. There is no place for islam in any western nation; BAN ISLAM !!!

    • Dan Borden

      Well, can we plz keep a few Muznutters around for fun? I write a newsletter for our golf league, and Muzmonkeys make for some of the most hilarious stories I find. PLZ!!

      • William III

        LOL, what about a trip to Syria? Enough news there for the next 20 years!.
        Cheers.

        • Dan Borden

          Yeah, but observing them up close and personal is even more fun. You know, it’s like a trip to the zoo.

      • pekin

        Sorry, Dan….The Crusaders Stopped TOO soon ~ We need to pick it back up (politically speaking) of course…

  • carpe diem 36

    america is in danger from within, it allows more moslems into this country and that is the first mistake. they will never integrate, they do not wish to look and behave as other immigrants, and we are letting more of them into this country, Ms. Merkel did the same thing and finally realized that they do not become part of any country they enter, they remain a foreign body, and just like a foreign body in the human body means cancer so does a foreign element in the political body is a cancer that eventually kill the body.

    • pekin

      I LOVE Your analogy…we need You at http://www.actforamerica.org !

    • kikorikid

      Spencer, Geller,Whilders ,etc have ALL pointed out
      the lack of Muslim assimilation into their host countries.
      They are ALL correct but there is a further caveat to this situation
      and that is, Muslims are not here to assimilate. They are here to:
      Conquer
      Submit
      Convert
      or
      Kill
      It is in their history,all of it, that this is their MO.
      NO assimilation. It is not “My way or the Highway”,
      it IS “My way or Death”.

  • Barbarossa Rotbart

    On June 4th 2011 I had the pleasure and the privilege to shake hands with Robert Spencer. He is a truth-teller.
    With seeing eyes the public doesn’ t see the truth. The truth is so mind boggling. It’s depressing.
    We are living in end times. I would like to recommend the book: “The End of America” by John Price

  • Walter Sieruk

    Part of the above article reads “how the United States deals with Islamic terriorism at home.” There is one way that the American citizens can deal with the subject of Islamic terrorism in the country. Which is the we ,as Americans should not live in fear or be afraid to go places and and do things because of fear of any jihadist threats. For to be afraid, in any way, would make the jihadist enemy happy.We should thus live our lives and do and see differents things with not feeling any intimidation at all because of any threats by the jihadists. Nevertheless eventhough we must not live in fear we still need to keep a balance and keep things in perspective and be aware of our surounding in this post 9/11 America.
    That is to keep a lookout for anything that seems not to look quite right. As in “What worng with this picture ?.” For example the Tee-shirt vender at Times Square NY, NY who saw some smoke come out of that parked van and then let a police officer know about it. As it has been said “If you se something way something.” To put this in a diferent way, Thomas Jefferson had the right idea when he stated “Let the eye of vigilance never be closed.”
    .

    • Joe The Gentile

      Partially true. Most truly, we should not GIVE IN to fear of working against Jihad, because THAT is what they want. But fear itself, properly channeled, IS appropriate, as is fear of anything dangerous.

  • seewithyourowneyes

    Truth Akbar!

  • herb benty

    I was just thinking what would happen if a bunch of rightwing Christians went to Pakistan, Iran or Malaysia and set up churches and organizations with the intention of destroying Muslims. And widely broadcast our goal of taking over the world. THIS is what Islam is doing to these United States. Why on earth should I be called deceptive names like , “Islamophobe”, if I say this is B.S.

  • Jake-a-runi

    Self-promoting one-trick pony.

    • Erudite Mavin

      Is that your new screen name?
      A good description of yourself.

      • Señor Mas Perfecto del Mundo

        Is that your new screen name?

        As opposed to what? Is anyone naming themselves with complimentary attributes worthy of the appellation?

    • SCREW SOCIALISM

      “Self-promoting one-trick pony.”

      muhammed (poobah) in a nutshell.

  • GSR

    Its already too late. Muslims are here in growing numbers – thanks to mass immigration, mostly legal ,and it’s way too generous “chain migration” for families/relatives. it’s the immigration, stupid.

    • Jake-a-runi

      Its already too late.

      Don’t give up so easily. If we could deport Luigi Galleani and a raft of followers, why not the Muhammedans? Violence is violence.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    The problem with Jihad is that we don’t talk about Jihad, as Spencer writes.

    So true and that’s because we have clueless writers like this particular reviewer, for instance, who is totally obsessed with sensationalizing what is really jihad (holy war) as somehow being terrorism. Not to mention that conflating and morally equating acts of jihad with terrorism is PC multiculturalism run amuck. However, it is understandable in his particular case since sensationalism is what sells and attracts readers.

    Nevertheless, terrorism and jihad are two very separate and distinct manifestations altogether. For instance, terrorism is always and only violent. While Jihad, on the other hand, manifest both violently and non-violently. However, because jihad is sensationalized in our society so much as being terrorism by the reviewer and the mass media, the many non-violent varieties of jihad, which manifest astronomically far more prevalently relative to the violent varieties of jihad, for the most part manifests completely ignored and totally unopposed throughout the infidel world. Since if it isn’t perceived as being violent, then it isn’t perceived as being terrorism. Thus, if it isn’t terrorism, then it doesn’t constitute a threat.

    Indeed, mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage to the infidel world, for instance, in reality is really non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad for the nefarious purposes of mass Muslim infiltration and eventual demographic conquest. As a matter of fact, no matter where mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage is occurring in the infidel world today, those Muslim immigrants just like clockwork always refuse to assimilate and integrate, and instead form Muslim enclaves that in time morph into Muslim no-go zones ruled by Sharia (Islamic totalitarian law). Of course, the very act of assimilating and integrating for a Muslim into an infidel society would in itself constitute a very grave act of blasphemy, and blasphemy in Islam is a capital offense.

    Nevertheless, so many people in our infidel society have become conditioned by this practice of always conflating and morally equating what is really jihad as somehow being terrorism, that they have come to believe that we only have to worry about Muslims who have been radicalized to perpetrate terrorism, and that for them constitutes the extent of the threat emanating from Islam. Thus, for most people Muslims that appear, for all intents and purposes, to be non-violent are so-called moderate Muslims, as opposed to what they actually are, which are non-violent stealth and deceptive jihadists.

    Not to mention that the 9/11 terrorist attacks were not acts of jihad. Instead, they were terrorist attacks resulting from America’s overly aggressive and greedy capitalist imperialist foreign policies, according to the Left. Or otherwise, according to Ron/Rand Paul kooks, blowback resulting from America’s overly aggressive interventionist foreign policies.

    Of course, both factions are totally wrong. The 9/11 terrorist attacks weren’t acts of terrorism at all. Instead, they were violent acts of jihad. Why? Because they were perpetrated by Muslims and perpetrated by Muslims in the cause of Allah to make Islam supreme. Now don’t tell the Left or Ron/Rand Paul kooks any of that, because they will both go ballistic. So will this reviewer of Spencer’s work?

    In any event, while violent jihad and terrorism are virtually indistinguishable in appearance, the difference is violent jihad is always and only perpetrated in the cause of Allah to make Islam supreme. While terrorism, on the other hand, is perpetrated for all kinds of various political reasons and causes, in stark contrast. Not to mention as well, that while jihad, whether of the violent variety or the non-violent variety, is always and only perpetrated by Muslims alone. Terrorism, on the other hand, is universal, in that all societies and all cultures have participated in perpetrating terrorism for various political reasons and causes.

    Indeed, jihad is peculiar to Islamic culture alone. No other culture other than Islamic culture wages jihad, which is a holy war in the cause of Allah to ultimately make Islam supreme.

    How do you distinguish between the two very separate and distinct manifestations? Simple, ask yourself was the act perpetrated by a Muslim or a non-Muslim? Was the act perpetrated in the cause of Allah to make Islam supreme or for another political cause unrelated to Islam? And don’t forget, that non-violent jihad relative to violent jihad manifest today astronomically far more prevalently. Yet, thanks to people obsessed by violence, like this reviewer and the mass media, for instance, for the most part it is almost totally ignored, because if it isn’t violent, then it isn’t terrorism, and if it isn’t terrorism, then it doesn’t constitute a threat.

    Moreover, Islam is not a faith. Instead, it’s a so-called religion of submission in that the first and foremost prerequisite of Islam is the total, complete, and unconditional submission to the “will of Allah” by all Muslims under the penalty of death for blasphemy and apostasy. Thus, in Islamic society any person whether of Islamic persuasion or not that openly denounces Islam for what it is or who openly rejects the tenets of Islam, is a blasphemer and receives an automatic death sentence. Likewise, any person of Islamic persuasion who openly apostatizes from Islam also receives an automatic death sentence.

    Do actual faith-based religions as opposed to Islam likewise put people to death for blasphemy and apostasy? Of course, the answer is no, which proves the reality that Islam is not actually a religion but a cult instead.

    However, to all Muslims who only know Islam as their religion, to them Islam is a religion. Indeed, it’s their religion. Nonetheless, only a suicidal fool and suicidal society would consider Islam to be a religion, when it so obviously is not.

    Furthermore, what is the “will of Allah” that all Muslims totally, completely, and unconditionally submit to under the penalty of death for blasphemy and apostasy? In essence it is Sharia, otherwise known as Islamic totalitarian law. Indeed, to all Muslims, Sharia (Islamic totalitarian law) supersedes all other laws in the world because it emanates directly from Allah (God).

    • Western Canadian

      You are such an utter and complete moron. Only you and muslims lie about jihadi terrorists.by claiming that they are NOT terrorists.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        You are such an utter and complete moron. Only you and muslims lie about jihadi terrorists.by claiming that they are NOT terrorists.

        Hey…it’s not my fault that all you leftwing Canadian moonbats have been inculcated and conditioned to become PC multicultural lunatics and as a result ignorantly conflate and morally equate what are actual acts of jihad as somehow being terrorism, sort of the same way Euroloons attack Christianity and the mere mention of Islam.

        Nevertheless moonbat, only Muslims and Muslim alone perpetrate both violent and non-violent acts of jihad in the cause of Allah to make Islam supreme. While terrorism, which is universal since it is perpetrated by all societies and cultures, is perpetrated for all kinds of various political causes other than in the cause of Allah to make Islam supreme. Indeed, the Unabomber and Timothy McVeigh were terrorists because they perpetrated their dastardly acts for causes other than Islam. Meanwhile, OBL and Major Hasan, on the other hand, were jihadists acting in the cause of Allah to make Islam supreme. Indeed, jihad (holy war) as opposed to terrorism is a manifestation solely unique to Islamic society alone. Get over it!

        • Dan Borden

          Now that I have complimented you, let me criticize you. You and Western ARE ON THE SAME SIDE!! He just did not read your OP closely. You didn’t enough attention to his point, which is anti-Muznutter. Damn, when I am the peacemaker, people have really screwed up.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Now that I have complimented you, let me criticize you. You and Western ARE ON THE SAME SIDE!! He just did not read your OP closely. You didn’t enough attention to his point, which is anti-Muznutter. Damn, when I am the peacemaker, people have really screwed up.

            Actually, Western Canadian and I have a long history together, as he used to be part of a cabal of posters that constantly sought my posts out to personally attack me. That cabal was eventually broken up because some of them were eventually banned. Thus, on occasion Western Canadian pops up every now and then and when he does, he also makes it a point to attack me. No big deal, as I have an exceedingly thick skin.

            Nevertheless, Western Canadian and I are not on the same side. If he were an American he’d be a Karl Rove type Republican, i.e., a moderate. While I’m a dyed in the wool conservative.

          • Dan Borden

            OK, didntt know the history, just seemed like you has the same take on Muzzies.

          • Daniel Greenfield

            Obama Yo Moma is on his own side. Which consists of libeling every Counterjihadist writer and researcher.

            Why he does this is open to question, but it’s not the behavior of someone who actually wants to participate in the Counterjihad. More likely it’s the behavior of someone seeking to sabotage it.

          • Joe The Gentile

            I think he’s counterjihad in spirit and intentions, but letting personality problems get in the way, to a likely overall negative effect.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            I think he’s counterjihad in spirit and intentions, but letting personality problems get in the way, to a likely overall negative effect.

            Personality problems because first you said I was accusing Greenfield of being a jihad denier. Then when I told you I didn’t know where you were getting that nonsense from, like an adolescent with deep seated personality issues, you responded back viciously. Thus, when I respond to you in kind, it’s somehow me with personality problems. Yeah right. I shouldn’t have wasted my time responding to an ignoramus like you in the first place, since it’s so obvious you don’t have the first clue in any event. You are just a complete and utter waste of time.

          • Joe The Gentile

            I didn’t ‘respond viciously’ — my reply is below. It’s respectful disagreement. Then you respond with:

            << you have been turned into a mindless PC multicultural loon from listening to the MSM all of your life. Please don’t let me impede your race into stupidity

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Why don’t you do me a favor crybaby and get out of my face. You don’t have anything to contribute anyway because you don’t know anything. In other words, get loss!

          • ObamaYoMoma

            My…thin skinned aren’t we?

        • pekin

          Euroloons, REALLY??? Just like Lefty, You have to resort to name calling!

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Euroloons, REALLY??? Just like Lefty, You have to resort to name calling!

            Dude, I have been calling Euroloons what they are Euroloons for years, where have you been? Indeed, the fact that you take offense to it indicates that you are also a delusional loon yourself!

        • kikorikid

          You bloviate over picayune circumstances.
          You admit Jihadist carry out terrorism but
          try to excuse it by saying “everybody does it”.
          Nobody does it on any scale that would come
          close to the Terror that Islamic Jihad brings
          to the World. No one cares about aligning
          your inner self in “Jihad”. Not relevant to
          anything. We are concerned about
          Islamic Terrorism that murders tens
          of thousands and more are promised.
          Your arguments are Taqiyya slop.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Whatever you are smoking moonbat, please send me some!

      • Johnnie the Jew

        No you’re your the moron dimwit not the writer of such an incisive take on passive jihad and its multitudinous manisfestations. Obviously this is all too subtle for your untutored and uninformed little head. Try some smelling salts before your nose grows down to your very pedestrian puerile little flat feet. Spencer is still real cool despite this little missive, however!

        • Daniel Greenfield

          Western Canadian is right. And there’s nothing wrong with Robert Spencer.

          There is something wrong with ObamaYoMoma a troll who consistently attacks CounterJihadist writers.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Where did I say there is something wrong with Robert Spencer? Moreover, I don’t attack counterjihad writers. I simply point out when you are wrong and then explain in detail why you are wrong. Aren’t we very sensitive and extremely insecure. Hmm.

          • Daniel Greenfield

            Right here in these comments.

            You also claimed you would debate Robert Spencer but you’re afraid he would ban you.

            But again… lying troll is lying troll.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            I spent several years as a regular on Spencer’s Jihadwatch.org site, and I’ve watched during that time several posters get booted off the site for getting under his skin. Since I respected him, I never challenged him. That’s not a lie, it’s the truth.

            Further, during that time I also hadn’t formulated my current stances on the issues of Islam yet, as that was during my formative years of study, when I was still learning and contemplating. Believe it or not, at one time I used hold you in high regard too, but you have fallen down several notches as I have learned more and more about Islam.

            As a matter of fact, I used to be a Republican too, but now that I have become more enlightened, I’m not one no longer. Indeed, I don’t know about you, but most of us evolve in time.

            But again… lying troll is lying troll.

            You’ve demonstrated ad nauseum that you can say it, but saying it and proving it are two different things. In other words, put your money where your mouth is.

          • Daniel Greenfield

            Robert Spencer is a gentleman who has always been willing to respond to sincere and intelligent questions.

            And to debate critics.

            You on the other have a history of trying to smear figures in the Counterjihad.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            All I do is point out the truth that like the so-called MSM you also morally equate and conflate jihad and terrorism, at the same time you also morally equate and conflate Islam as being a religion, and that demonstrates that you suffer from some not so subtle leftwing PC multicultural tendencies. If the truth constitutes a smear, then so be it.

            In other words, you are mistaken, as jihad is not terrorism and a so-called religion that you can’t leave without being killed is a cult as opposed to a religion.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            All I do is point out the truth that like the so-called MSM you also morally equate and conflate jihad and terrorism, at the same time you also morally equate and conflate Islam as being a religion, and that demonstrates that you suffer from some not so subtle leftwing PC multicultural tendencies. If the truth constitutes a smear, then so be it.

            In other words, you are mistaken, as jihad is not terrorism and a so-called religion that you can’t leave without being killed is a cult as opposed to a religion.

          • Joe The Gentile

            OYM, why do you write on these sites? Do you want to be effective? If you want to be effective, be less antagonistic. And learn not to RECEIVE counter-argument as if it is personal insult; and learn not to GIVE insult where counter-argument is needed.

            I would agree that Islam is certainly not a fit for the term ‘only a religion’, but then this is true also of Judaism. Islam is a religion and a very problemmatic ancient and outdated politics of Jihad; Judaism is a religion and an ethnicity and a little more. The point that you can’t leave Islam without being killed is well taken. This is a very evil aspect of Islam.

            When you say, ‘Islam is not a religion because it kills people who leave it and is therefore a cult’, that’s RIGHT NOW a political statement, not an analytical one. That political statement may have value. There may be value in a redefinition of ‘religion’ for good political purposes. But as it stands, that is not the standing definition. So you have to convince people, gently.

            There is a similar situation with the phrase ‘followers of Islam’. They are arguably not followers of Islam, because they are forced to be in it, being killed if they leave it. Such a person is not a ‘follower’ in the true sense. There is a word for what such a person is; such a person is a *subject* of Islam (and/or of Muhammad).

            Islam has ZERO followers today, and 1400 or so subjects.

    • Father Dacius

      It’ all one and the same, praise The Lord and pass the ammunition. Let’s make a deal with Russia and China to split the middle east east. Keep the Philipines and Malaysia autonomous all get along as three happy neighbors. Let them deal with the 6th century idiots.

    • Joe The Gentile

      OmamaYoMama, agreed but with a two disagreements. Firstly, neither Daniel Greenfield himself nor his review here are in any sense jihad-denying. Secondly the dichotomy between violent Jihad and terrorism is false. For example, 9/11 was violent jihad; AND it was jihad terror or terror jihad; AND it was terrorism.

      The problem with the jihad-deniers is that they reject the jihad label where it unequivocally applies; it is not that they accept the terror label where it applies.

      Your writings for the counter-Jihad are appreciated.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        Firstly, neither Daniel Greenfield himself nor his review here are in any sense jihad-denying.

        Never said Greenfield is a jihad denier. Don’t know where that comes from. Instead, I illustrated the fact that he conflates and morally equates jihad as somehow being terrorism, just like the mass media, and that is very misleading and also very detrimental to our interests as well. Since he is a trusted writer, he owes it to his audience not to be misleading. He also erroneously claims Islam is a religion as well, and that’s also not true.

        Secondly the dichotomy between violent Jihad and terrorism is false. For example, 9/11 was violent jihad; AND it was jihad terror or terror jihad; AND it was terrorism.

        Apparently, like most people, you have also been duped into conflating and morally equating jihad as somehow being terrorism via the constant media barrage. Oh well.

        • Joe The Gentile

          No. Like the author of the piece, I simply don’t buy your false dichotomy. And I disagree with you that your false dichotomy helps the counter-jihad.

          In fact, your position on this is identical to that of the Islamists. It’s not terror–it’s Jihad–you and the Islamists are together on this; do you join the Islamists in saying it’s not murder, it’s Jihad; it’s not rape, it’s Jihad?

          • ObamaYoMoma

            In other words, you have been turned into a mindless PC multicultural loon from listening to the MSM all of your life. Please don’t let me impede your race into stupidity.

            By the way, so-called Islamists, like radical Muslims, only exist in the unhinged minds of people blinded by PC multiculturalism.

          • Joe The Gentile

            OYM, you’re needlessly offensive to possible allies. You heavily discharge abuse when defeated in argument. You won’t be useful to the counterjihad unless you change. The marketplace of ideas has spoken to your essay. Two likes in a very well browsed and commented article. I took pity on you and commended your efforts. But you are not demonstrating what it takes in terms if emotional maturity.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            What could possibly make you think that I could care what an ignoramus like you thinks, because I don’t!

          • Joe The Gentile

            OYM,that sounds EXACTLY like what a child would say, and it’s sad, and it’s sad that you can’t see it. OYM, please receive counseling or friendly guidance. Your antisocial tendencies make you destructive to the counterjihad. You attack people merely for not agreeing with you totally. Movements are advanced only by people who can work with other people, in valuable agreement with each other, but without total agreement.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            What? You call people anti-Social because they aren’t dumb enough to agree with your stupidity? Seek mental help for your severe problems with mental disease, and buy a brain while you are at it! Because you most definitely need one.

          • Joe The Gentile

            No. The record is visible above if you want to check it out. It was all civil, through while I exposed some significant weaknesses in your argument to which you then responded:

            >> you have been turned into a mindless PC multicultural loon from listening to the MSM all of your life. Please don’t let me impede your race into stupidity

            It was therefore you who turned it offensive and personal. This is black-and-white. Have a trusted friend check it out for you if you can’t/won’t see it. But a real friend–not someone who will just agree with you for fear of being attacked.

    • c0cky

      it’s ‘amok’..

      • ObamaYoMoma

        Okay

    • Dan Borden

      This is a brilliant piece. I think I am damn good, but you have packed a tremendous amount of insight and knowledge into a relatively short essay. It would take me three frigging pages to pack this amount of info into words. Ever think of writing for Frontpage or a similar site?

    • pekin

      I have read Your whishy washy B.S. on other post, Sir…I would love to hear You debate Mr.Spencer! I KNOW You, because You claim: “like this reviewer”…. Western Canadian, also, has called You out, so no matter how long Your boring post is, You SPIN!

      • ObamaYoMoma

        I have read Your whishy washy B.S. on other post, Sir…I would love to hear You debate Mr.Spencer!

        Actually, I initially learned a lot from Mr. Spencer, but in my opinion Mr. Spencer doesn’t go far enough, as he limits his alarmism to Muslim groups, whether of the violent variety or the non-violent variety.

        However, because Islam is a so-called religion of submission, whereby all Muslims must totally, completely, and unconditionally submit to the “will of Allah” under the penalty of death for blasphemy and apostasy, which Spencer doesn’t dispute, all Muslims must adhere to the tenets of Islam or otherwise face the consequences, i.e., pay the fiddler.

        Hence, since waging jihad in the cause of Allah in Islam is a fundamental holy obligation incumbent upon all Muslims in one form or another, all Muslims are jihadists in one form or another, either violent or non-violent. Otherwise they are blasphemous apostates that per the texts and tenets of Islam must be executed. Thus, since all Muslims are jihadists in one form or another, it is very suicidal to allow mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage. On this issue, Mr. Spencer has been silent.

        Yeah, I’d like to debate him on that particular issue, and I thought about doing it on his site. However, I have also watched him ban posters who raised issues he didn’t want to debate. So in the interest of not being banned, I never raised the issue. So sue me!

        Meanwhile, I’d like to debate you because I know I would make mincemeat out of you!

        I KNOW You, because You claim: “like this reviewer”…. Western Canadian, also, has called You out, so no matter how long Your boring post is, You SPIN!

        Western Canadian used to be part of a cabal that constantly ganged up together to personally attack me. As a matter of fact, several of those posters in that cabal were eventually banned from this site altogether. In any event, if Western Canadian were an American, he’d be an establishment Republican, i.e., a RINO, and in my book, establishment Republicans are almost as bad as the Marxist Totalitarian Left that is in charge of this country today. Nevertheless, the way you emote indicates that you are a member in good standing of the Marxist Totalitarian Left, and the fact that you are virtually oblivious, indicates that you are a low information voter and a drone.

        • Daniel Greenfield

          Robert Spencer hasn’t been silent about Muslim immigration.

          I can only speculate about the motives that lead a cretin like you to consistently lie about Counterjihadist writers.

          • Joe The Gentile

            No pro-jihad motives. Notice the general rage at any disagreement. Rather, a likely narcissistic personality disorder manifesting in rage at not being on top. He sees you and Robert Spencer as being big dogs, at which the narcissistic little dog must bark to assert dominance.

          • Daniel Greenfield

            I don’t know. I’m not a psychologist. It does seem narcissistic. But it’s hard to tell crazy people from concern trolls sometimes.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Mr. Spencer has said that mass Muslim immigration to the infidel world is really non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad? If he did, where and when, as I must have missed it. Post a link if you aren’t just making it up.

            As to my motives, they are quite simple. It is to get you and other mainstream writers to stop misrepresenting important aspects of Islam that cause mass confusion. Indeed, Jihad is unique to Islamic society alone, but yet to you it is morally equated and conflated as somehow as being terrorism, which is universal to all societies. Indeed, that is very misleading, because it leads to all sorts of misunderstandings regarding the nature of the enemy and the conflict we are dealing with.

            Moreover, Islam is not a religion, unless you consider a so-called religion that will kill you if you apostatize from it or kill you for blasphemy to be a religion. I don’t as that is a cult, a very totalitarian cult.

          • Daniel Greenfield

            Robert Spencer has discussed the danger of Muslim immigration…

            …as you probably know quite well since you just go on repeating the same smears no matter how often they’re disproven.

            I don’t know what your motives are, but you repeatedly lie about and attack Counterjihadist writers

            Your actions speak for themselves and they are exactly what a leftist or Muslim trying to undermine the Counterjihad would do

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Robert Spencer has discussed the danger of Muslim immigration… as you know quite well.

            Actually, he focuses his efforts for the most part on various Islamic groups in America and abroad such as the MB and its various affiliates. He kind of mentioned once or twice that I recall that Muslim immigration should be a part of a national discussion. However, for the most part thought he shies away from that sensitive issue and focuses his efforts on citing specific verses and hadiths. Indeed, he’s kind of hard to pin down on certain issues and I think it is intentional.

            I don’t know what your motives are, but you repeatedly lie about and attack Counterjihadist writers

            You know what my motives are because I told you and I don’t lie or attack anyone. Disagreeing isn’t attacking. Apparently, you are very insecure and sensitive.

            Your actions speak for themselves and they are exactly what a leftist or Muslim trying to undermine the Counterjihad would do

            Yeah right, I sound like a leftist or a Muslim. That’s hilarious! Meanwhile, you morally equate and conflate jihad as somehow being terrorism exactly like a PC multicultural leftist. As a matter of fact, you also morally equate and conflate Islam as being a religion exactly like a PC multicultural leftist as well.

          • Daniel Greenfield

            You claimed that “it is very suicidal to allow mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage. On this issue, Mr. Spencer has been silent.”

            It’s false.

            Now you’re moving your goal posts.

            “He kind of mentioned once or twice that I recall that Muslim immigration
            should be a part of a national discussion. However, for the most part
            though he shies away from that sensitive issue and focuses his efforts
            on citing specific verses and hadiths.”

            As I’ve said before, you’re a malicious lying troll.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            You claimed that “it is very suicidal to allow mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage. On this issue, Mr. Spencer has been silent.”
            It’s false.

            If Robert Spencer has been calling for an end to mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage to the infidel world because it is really non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad, then more power to him, but I’m unaware of it nonetheless. Can you cite some specific examples to support your false allegation and to also demonstrate that I should have been aware of everything he does? Excuse me if I won’t hold my breath.

            Now you’re moving your goal posts.

            Not really. The most I have ever seen him do is suggest that a national debate on the issue should take place at some time. However, I must admit I haven’t been reading very much of Spencer’s work for the past couple of years. Hence, if he is calling for an end to mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage, then it must be quite recent. Nonetheless, I’m unaware of it. Thus, can you provide some specific examples to demonstrate what you are saying is factual?

            As I’ve said before, you’re a malicious lying troll.

            Again, if I’m malicious and also a lying troll, put your money where your mouth is and prove it. I mean for a man of your statue it shouldn’t be very difficult at all. Indeed, you failed miserably where Spencer is concerned, as a lame strawman argument just won’t cut it. You will have to do much better than that.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      A lying troll is still a lying troll.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        Back it up. Put your money where your mouth is.

        • Daniel Greenfield

          I did it repeatedly in the past. It doesn’t stop you from repeating the same lies again.

          Because you’re a lying troll. You can’t prove things to a lying troll.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            I did it repeatedly in the past. It doesn’t stop you from repeating the same lies again.
            Because you’re a troll.

            Yeah right, in your dreams! Sorry but calling me a lying troll over and over again like a broken record is not only very childish, it also doesn’t count as putting your money where your mouth is. In other words, you can’t put your money where your mouth is. Which is what I already knew.

          • Daniel Greenfield

            You lied about Robert Spencer right here.

            I’ve already demonstrated it.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            The only thing you demonstrated is that you are delusional.

          • Daniel Greenfield

            You claimed that “it is very suicidal to allow mass Muslim
            immigration with all of its excess baggage. On this issue, Mr. Spencer has been silent.”

            It’s false.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Like I said, you are delusional.

  • liberalism is a mental illness

    Hey everybody!! Google “Necro Butcher vs Mr Insanity.” Watch the video on YouTube.

    Don’t #*&% with America!! W’hoo!!

    Tell me what ya think of the video.

  • Father Dacius

    I wish this had been written shortly after 9/11.More mud huts leveled, but a lot mor peace of mind.

  • glissando

    FOR THOSE…
    WHO CAN STILL THINK, WATCH THE NEW COSMOS.THE CLIMATE CHANGES ARE ALWAYS CAUSED
    BY PLANETARY PERTURBATIONS, NOT BY ANYTHING OUR BOY OBAMA AND HIS PALS DREAMT
    UP…https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hyLaTDAvVg

  • pekin

    Excellent Book and I’ve met Robert, He is very friendly and has a funny sense of Humor ;)

  • pekin

    BRAVO!!

  • Ahumanbeing

    What a sad discussion board. A bunch of insecure bigots. Luckily, most Americans are not like this.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      We’re “insecure?”

      What do you think of anonymous forum users that block their comment stream?

      • Ahumanbeing

        Well apparently the mod. here won’t allow me to comment. Toodles.

    • liberalism is a mental illness

      What a dumb leftard you are!!

    • Daniel Greenfield

      more than you think

  • Jay

    India’s partition. You see the law of Muslim majority and minority in action out of the partition. Muslim majority (Pakistan/Bangladesh) – result is suffering and near extinction of Hindus. Muslim minority (India) – never ending terror attacks, and playing the victim.

    Hindus whether minorities in Muslim majority Pakistan, or majority in Muslim minority India, suffer, are attacked and killed and lives ruined.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      exactly