Are Hillary’s Insecurities Destroying her Candidacy Again?

Hillary Clinton Honors Late Ambassador Chris Stevens At Awards Ceremony

That’s the unspoken idea behind some of the critiques of Hillary Clinton’s premature campaign by Obama’s people.

Top advisers and former aides to Barack Obama say Hillary Clinton is repeating the mistakes she made in 2008, building a machine in lieu of a message and lumbering toward the Democratic nomination with the same deep vulnerabilities that cost her the nomination eight years earlier.

The former secretary of state has offered her tacit blessing to a series of Democratic organizations, including a draft group, Ready for Hillary, which was recently taken over by a former Clinton aide, and Priorities USA Action, the Obama super PAC repositioning itself to raise huge sums for Clinton. The moves have been effective in telegraphing to other would-be candidates that they may have a hard time raising money and building an organization, and in establishing the sense of inevitability that was central to her 2008 campaign — a perception that also backfired badly.

In 2008, that sense of inevitability had tactical consequences: her positions drew more scrutiny than her rivals’, and observers developed a rooting interest in the underdog, while donors and operatives who hadn’t gotten in on the Clinton ground floor 20 years earlier went elsewhere. And Obama aides, who outmaneuvered the Clinton juggernaut seven years ago, see similar weaknesses developing already.

“I just don’t see any strategic value in stories positioning her as inevitable or the preemptive nominee, and I don’t think people who are out there talking about this help her, and I think she should make that clear,” said Joel Benenson, Obama’s chief campaign pollster and now the top White House pollster. “She doesn’t need this. If she decides to run for president, everybody knows she’s going to be able to raise money, everybody knows she’s going to be extremely formidable, that she’s going to have a significant network of supporters around the country — so what’s the value of all this in 2014?”

The value is deterring opposition. It didn’t really work in 2008, but this time Hillary Clinton thinks she has the left’s blessing, Obama anointed her as the candidate for 2016 in exchange for her husband campaigning and lying for him in 2012.

But Hillary is an insecure control freak so she isn’t leaving anything to chance.

“I see real similarities emerging in terms of carrying the mantle of the status quo, getting out front too soon — and playing it safe. The GOP is so messed up it might work — but running this way could be the way she loses again,” said Joe Trippi, a top adviser to Edwards.

That air of inevitability proved a particular problem in the early states of Iowa and New Hampshire, where activists expect to be courted; and when Ready for Hillary arrived in Des Moines last month, it wasn’t clear who was supposed to be making the first move.

“All this stuff about her being destined to be [the nominee], and it coming from top-down, and being ordained — we’ve really got to work hard to overcome that. It’s got to be grassroots up,” said Phyllis Peters, a 55-year-old resident of Ames, Iowa, who volunteered for her 2008 campaign.

“Everybody has to earn it,” said Peters. “You can’t assume it’s been given to you on a silver platter.”

The whole point of Ready for Hillary is the silver platter. There’s nothing grassroots about Clintonworld. This was a campaign that had been planned as soon as Bill left the White House. The move to New York, the perfect place to meet and hook up with wealthy backers outside California which had two sitting Democratic senators, and prep the ground for the White House.

  • gawxxx

    she should be hanging from a tree somewhere in somalia

  • camp7

    Hillary is done by 2016. Too much baggage for even her own clammy broom and besides, there’s only so many women supremacists voters that would support a pathetic philandering husband just to claw their path to public office.

  • darnellecheri

    If ever a woman’s insecurities – and the havoc they wreck – can be redeemed for some good and salvation, let it be now!

  • truebearing

    Hillary really works the identity politics to death but she just isn’t likeable outside the ranks of Leftists, lesbians, and losers.

    • lyndaaquarius

      very good point. Charm does matter and she’s not beloved like Sarah Palin. She’s a woman and who else is there? That whole nonsense about Hillary’s brilliance needs to be broken down, achievement by achievement. Political conniving aside,what has she accomplished for the middle class,not herself. It’s called kicking the tires,right?

      • truebearing

        If Hillary was a snake charmer, like Obama, she’d be unbeatable. Her problem is that she is the snake.

  • ZZ

    Hillary’s face is destroying my desire to procreate again.

  • Guest

    Ridicule and mockery will defeat Hillary. It’s the only thing that will reach the emotional people of today. Old-lady-fat-face Hillary and cankles MacHillary are a good starting point. The crueler and the funnier the better. Arguments bounce off the emotional, it’s a pure waste of time with them.

  • StarTripper

    I am sure Hillary feels she earned it by standing by Obama (and the lies) during Benghazi just like she stood by Bill (and the lies) during impeachment. None of that cuts any ice with the grassroots but there you are.

  • logdon

    Often the key moment of a politicians life will revolve around one statement.

    Neville Chamberlain’s was Peace in our time.

    Bill Clinton, I did not have sex with that woman.

    David Cameron, Today, I will give this cast-iron guarantee: If I become PM a Conservative government will hold a referendum on any EU treaty.

    Winston Churchill, blood toil tears and sweat

    Sir Edward Grey, The lamps are going out all over Europe, we shall not see them lit again in our life-time.

    Obama, If you like your health plan you can keep it

    And Hillary Clinton, at this point, what difference does it make?

    Some are positive, uplifting and honest, some depressingly naive, whist others are self serving and knowingly deceptive.

    Given time the truth, like water, has a way of finding its own level and from then on is fixed in a public imagination.

    Once the cult of the personality fades into obscurity only the words remain and stripped of any mindless adulation can be assessed as stand alone statement which is almost a virtual avatar of that person’s character.

    What difference does it make was uttered in a rare unguarded moment of Hillary’s career and the unfeeling rage together with her girly and petulant clenched fists spoke volumes.

    That she didn’t give a damn about four dead and that her focus was entirely on self preservation rose like a toxic steam and all but the blind, bewitched fans could see it.

    It was the moment when all her lies melded into one giant ball of anger almost as if she had so beguiled even herself into believing that they were true.

    How dare you challenge my untruths was the unspoken massage and that was that. Hillary had spoken.

    Whether or not Ms Clinton achieves her court coup will be quite a test of American character.

    If she seduces sufficient fans by the divide and rule of leftist feminism and she pulls it off we may as well pull up our personal drawbridges, and ready ourselves for the rough ride ahead.

    Given what I see of the RINO opposition it could very well happen.

  • lyndaaquarius

    A question for Phyllis Peters: why do the grassroots want Hillary so badly? How do they feel she will strengthen and improve their lives and our country? Please don’t answer “time for a woman” or “she’s suffered/traveled /cares so much. What are the specifics?

  • Crassus

    It will be good whiskey and bad cocaine, rather than Hillary’s insecurities, which will bring her campaign down.