Beheading is Against Islam, That’s Why Mohammed Owned a Sword Named “Cleaver of Vertebrae”

tumblr_mjx4q0UfHe1s5flgxo1_500

Can anyone name Moses or Jesus’ favorite swords? Mohammed though had a huge sword collection, a lot of them stolen from other people, because he was kind of a psycho.

How much did Mohammed like his swords? He named them. And he liked them more than his wives or just about anything else.

“The al-Rasub sword is one of the nine swords of the prophet Muhammad. It is said that the weapons of the house of the prophet Muhammad were kept among his family just like the Ark was kept with the Israelites.”

Except the Ark contained the word of G-d, while the sword was something that Mohammed used to murder non-Muslims. There is no better contrast between religions.

One of his favorite swords was Dhu al-Faqar or “Cleaver of Vertebrae”. When you see this kind of sword on a Jihadist flag, that’s ole Faqar. Muslim legend says that the sword was given to Mohammed by an angel. Actually he looted it in battle or his followers did.

“Dhu al-Faqar is the name of this sword, taken as Booty by the prophet Muhammad at the Battle of Badr. It is reported that the prophet Muhammad gave the sword to Ali b. Abi Talib, and that Ali returned from the Battle of Uhud covered with blood from his hands to his shoulders, having Dhu al-Faqar with him. “

Cheerful story. Nothing to do with Islam of course, except for it involving its prophet and his campaign to convert everyone to Islam by the sword… of which he had a whole bunch.

The sword got passed down to various Muslim Caliphs and rulers until one of them tried to kill a dog with it and it broke. It might have been the obvious design flaw.

So much for the magic sword.

But let’s not be judgmental. It turns out that Mohammed also had the sword of a whole bunch of people.

“The al-Battar sword was taken by the prophet Muhammad as booty from the Banu Qaynaqa. It is called the “sword of the prophets” and is inscribed in Arabic with the names of David, Solomon, Moses, Aaron, Joshua, Zechariah, John, Jesus, and Muhammad. It also has a drawing of King David when cut off the head of Goliath to whom this sword had belonged originally. . . .”

The Banu Qaynaqa were among the Jews massacred by Mohammed and his murderous thugs. In the twisted mindset of Islam having a sword with a bunch of names of religious figures on it means that you succeed them.

Islam really is the religion of the sword.

  • Gee

    Go ahead bring a sword to a gun fight. I bet I can defeat any sword

    • acmaurer

      Well, not if your hands are tied behind your back and you’re kneeling. then these brave Islamists with their faces covered will beat you every time.

    • Larry Larkin

      As a jihadist found out in Australia last week when he took a knife to a gunfight by attempting to murder 2 police officers by stabbing them at a meeting he’d asked for.
      And the local muslim spokesgarbage carried on like the police had done the wrong thing by shooting him dead on the spot.

      • Hamalot

        In fairness to the Police, they needed to get his attention so they merely fired a warning shot through the head. Works every time.

  • Biff Henderson

    From the sword link –
    “As part of his preparation to spread the peaceful religion of Islam throughout the world, Muhammad kept a well-stocked arsenal of swords.”

    Spreading peace with death.

    • Keith

      “Spreading peace with death”
      Have you ever been to a graveyard? I have never heard any noise from the dead so he was certainly spreading the peace.
      Its just a pity he didn’t spread the peace to the muslims first.

  • johninohio1

    I would think a Muslim would be upset that a dog, hated by Muslims, defeated the holy sword. Sweet irony! Some people just can’t take a hint.

  • Douglas J. Bender

    I’m surprised Obama hasn’t claimed that Islam also originated the sitcom, with their ancient and ongoing reenactments of their favorite episodes from “Leave It to Cleaver”.

    • De Doc

      “Gee Wally…” *whack*. And so ended the shortest sitcom of all times.

  • Bamaguje

    Hmmn!!
    Mo’ looted a sword from one of his victims then glorified it as Islam’s “sword of the prophets.”
    This is basically is what Islam is all about… Stolen ideas & myths from Judeo-Christianity that are perverted, corrupted and debased as uniquely Islam.

    • Derek W

      I completely agree…but, where do you think judeo-christian myths came from? Maybe an earlier, more accurate mythological account, the Babylonian creation myth, the Enuma Elish perhaps?
      “This is basically what Judaism and Christianity are all about… Stolen ideas & myths from Babylonian legends and other pagan sources that were perverted, corrupted and debased as uniquely Judeo-Christian.”

      lol, historical word play is fun and i love religion based arguments…

      • ProbingOmega

        Christians must bury the concept of ‘Judeo-Christian.’ They are polar opposites. The God of the old testament is not Jesus Christ. No way.

        • Derek W

          Once again, I agree with this comment…Christianity absorbed and munipulated the Torah…Judaism absorbed and munipulated Babylonian and other pagan myths. Abrahamic religions(Judaism, Christianity, and Islam)are all a collage of pagan myths, symbolism, and holy days.

          • ProbingOmega

            Hinduism, Judaism, Christianity, Islam … are all man made religions. Jesus Christ was not a Christian. The religion was not created until after he died. Spirituality is real. But the attributes and motives of the infinite Creator, if these terms even apply, is beyond the comprehension of the finite creation.

          • Derek W

            I guess you lost me, as far as what are you arguing for or against. I was arguing, basically, that Abrahamic religons all absorbed and munipulated earlier sources….are you now arguing for the spiritual legitimacy of Jesus Christ or what? Yes, spirituality is real…the will of the Creator, if it applies, is beyond our comprehension. However, all religions are created by man(or at least written down and misinterpreted by man). There are mythological demi-god figures who were born out of immaculate conception that far predate Christ or Christianity by thousands of years.

          • ProbingOmega

            If Christ existed and if the quotes in the Bible are close to what he actually said, then it is possible that Christ was a divine being. But if all that is said about Jesus in the Bible is ignored and only what is attributed to Jesus actually saying is considered (the red letters), a very different picture emerges of this figure. Jesus never claims he was born to a virgin. Does he? That’s point one.

            Point two is all that religions are created by men. On this, we agree. These are the sources of the demi-gods you mention. It is easily observed that these religions split apart, even within their own major divisions, and these subgroups argue with each other making it impossible to determine anything regarding spiritual reality.

            Point three is that an infinite Creator is self-evident, but the finite creation is incapable of comprehending or explaining it.

          • Derek W

            You rely on scripture(created by munipulative men)to construct the foundation of your faith…yet, claim that the finite creation(man)is incapable of comprehending or explaining it? Good luck on your search for spiritual truth, my friend. I know nothing, but history; and, we can’t really discuss beliefs.

          • ProbingOmega

            You do not know the real ‘history.’ All you have are your beliefs. If you know anything about history and even modern day ‘news’ you know that it is all manipulated. We must rely upon our common sense and discernment to even have a chance of ‘knowing’ anything of the reality of human events. Good luck on your spiritual journey as well.

          • Derek W

            Ok…I am a trained biblical archeologist, who has a degree in middle eastern archeology, world religions, and anthropology. I have been to excavations in Israel and saw a mosaic of Jesus next to the astrological signs(among other things). Academia certainly gives a biased and propagandized version of history, but physical archeological evidence that suggest historical and religious evolution(adopting ideas and belief systems and changing them for the time or culture) cannot be ignored (stellas, manuscripts, reliefs, any cultural and religious artifacts). Moreover, Christ like figures existed in myths and legends thousands of years prior to Jesus Christ. You can ignore it and choose not to directly respond to the concept of historical Christ predecessors, if you will, but it doesn’t erase physical historical evidence–regardless and in spite of history being misrepresented and intentionally munipulated.

          • ProbingOmega

            “I am a trained biblical archeologist, who has a degree in middle eastern archeology, world religions, and anthropology.”

            Before I respond in too much depth, do you realize you misspelled ‘archaeology’ twice?

          • Derek W

            Both spellings are acceptable…samsung auto spell chooses archeology over archaeology. People like you are priceless…you pick and choose the facts or ideas that support your belief and reject anything that doesn’t. Well, don’t trust the finite creation, media, movies, physical evidence, or books unless it supports my own opinions, which are mostly devoid of pertinent facts. Here, watch this movie, lol. Zeitgeist has nothing to do with how my opinions were formed. I would say, study world religions and belief systems with an honest and open mind(which I am sure in an absolute impossibility)…religions have come so far from the original spiritual truth. Man has been around for quite a few years…was every belief system prior to Christ’s arrival wrong? Ugh, ummmmm, just disregard those hundreds of thousands of years.

          • ProbingOmega

            “… samsung auto spell chooses archeology over archaeology …”

            You need an auto spell to correctly spell your supposed field of expertise? The American Journal of Archaeology spells it ‘archaeology.’

            School of Archaeology – University of Oxford
            Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology at Harvard
            Council on Archaeological Studies at Yale University
            Division of Archaeology – University of Cambridge

            Do a web search for your spelling: ‘middle eastern archeology’ and see that the returns are for ‘archaeology.’

            The rest of your reply was not a conversation but an outburst, so it’s time to bid a good day to you.

          • Derek W

            http://www.lycoming.edu/archaeology/alumni.aspx
            Derek Whitman

            I am not on a pc, I am using a samsung galaxy tab 3…auto-spell is significantly easier than thumbing each individual letter. The acceptable spelling I used had little to nothing to do with my arguement. It’s just easier to dismiss people like me.

          • ProbingOmega

            “Christ like figures existed in myths and legends thousands of years prior to Jesus Christ. You can ignore it and choose not to directly respond to the concept of historical Christ predecessors, if you will, but it doesn’t erase physical historical evidence …”

            This film responds to this. Can you comment?

            Zeitgeist Refuted Final Cut (Full Movie)

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hgX6w4U-2o&feature=youtube_gdata_player

          • Richard Conway

            Probing- Let’s look at the red letters, Jesus claims to be God. He says, “Before Abraham was, I am.” That’s a clear reference to him being God, which is why immediately after him saying that, the people wanted to stone him because to them, that was blasphemy.

            I’m glad you start at belief in an infinite God, because if there is an infinite God with no limitations, don’t you think he would know how to communicate Himself to us if He wanted to? Yes! If there is an infinite God, then he cannot be limited in His means of communication, and although we can’t FULLY understand him, it doesn’t mean that we can’t understand Him at all. If God is infinite, then don’t you think he would be able to get his WORD out there?

          • ProbingOmega

            Here’s the verse you quoted.

            John 8:58 (KJV)
            58 “Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.”

            Yes, Richard, an infinite Creator should be able to communicate to its creation in any way it wished without limitation. And people will have their own personal beliefs on this matter. It is of no interest to me to start arguments or even challenge the beliefs of anyone. It is my interest to discover for myself as best I can how to live a good moral life with empathy for my fellow man while still preserving my individual liberty and providing for my family.

            My belief is that the Creator would communicate directly without intermediaries since intermediaries are prone to error, corruption and questionable motives. The methods of this communication would vary and some would not be obvious while some might constitute what is commonly referred to as a ‘religious experience.’

            The written WORD as a means of communication is especially prone to error and corruption as to which the many interpretations attest. But beyond that, people are sorely equipped to know the original transcriptions and languages in which the transcriptions were recorded. We are also left rudderless in resolving the controversies surrounding the authors of the original transcriptions and the authenticity of the dictation, if you will.

            People are required to take someone else’s word for the veracity of all religious texts and the translation and interpretation of those texts since we are not all linguists schooled in the times and the languages of the past.

            Anyone who has some years of experience in attending different churches and different denominations knows that priests, preachers, pastors and congregations all have their own beliefs on these matters and many of these beliefs are not only different from each other but some are actually hostile to other interpretations and doctrines of other religious practice. This confusion and hostility is not conducive to healthy spiritual development. It is, in fact, destructive in that regard.

            And while the finite cannot comprehend the infinite, let alone, explain it, the finite is able to explore and discover both materialistic and spiritual portions of the attributes of the infinite.

            It is this opportunity that brought me back from agnosticism after religious faith had been shaken upon realizing the issues mentioned above. It was decades of personal observation of human activities, spiritual phenomena and new discoveries in science that resurrected my belief in an infinite Creator.

          • SurfaceUnits

            and John Heisman,wasn’t a heisman trophy winner. Your illogic is delusional.

        • http://www.19252907008.com Details For Me

          What abysmal ignorance, ProbingO. If you had read the whole Bible, verse by verse, there is NO possible way you could reach that conclusion.

          • ProbingOmega

            I’ve read it, Details.

            But do you understand that Judaism is not Christianity? Do you understand that Judaism and Judaists deny the divinity of Jesus Christ? Do you understand that the Jewish Babylonian Talmud blasphemies Jesus Christ?

            Do you understand that the True Torah Jews call the political state of Israel a blasphemy?

            Do you understand the difference between a Jew, a Judaist and a Zionist?

            Christians in the United States have been mis-taught from the pulpit for over a century.

  • http://ruleofreason.blogspot.com/ Edward Cline

    In the Muslim remake of “Raiders of the Lost Ark,” Indiana Jones doesn’t get to shoot the guy with the twirling swords; he gets his gun hand lopped off by the guy from fifty paces.

  • MukeNecca

    There is no doubt in my mind that had the “prophet” Mohammad lived in a more modern times he would have, beside swords, collected gold teeth extracted from the mouth of his victims.

    • contemptuous Maximus

      If he lived near me he would have collected bullets

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Islam really is the religion of the sword.

    If all the earlier issued peaceful verses of the Koran and the same ones that initially made Islam a religion are no longer applicable because according to the Doctrine of Abrogation they have all been abrogated because they conflict with the latter issued sword verses of the Koran that commands all Muslims to wage jihad against all infidels until such time as Islam and its followers have been made supreme, then exactly how it is do you figure Islam is a religion?

    Are the infamous sword verses alone, which were some of the very last verses of the Koran issued by Muhammad shortly before his death and are evil incarnate, enough to make Islam a religion? I don’t believe.

    Not only is Islam not a religion, but the Koran itself should be outlawed and banned.

  • truebearing

    So. Mohammed had a sword collection. He had nothing to do with Islam, the religion of peace. The people he beheaded were all victims of workplace violence.

    • Louie

      Hopefully soon someone will introduce the muzzies to their arrow collection, ICBM style.

  • wileyvet

    Yes indeed Muhammad did a lot of smiting. From simple warner at Mecca to Warlord of Medina. Following verses are all Medina ones. It is generally acknowledged that verse 9:5 The Verse of the Sword abrogates no fewer than 124 verses relating to peace and harmony or treaties with non-Muslims. It is also generally accepted that Surah 9 Repentance was at the very end of Muhammad’s life after the conquest of Mecca, if not in fact the last Surah revealed. Translation Yusuf Ali.
    Q5:33. The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter;

    Q8:12. Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): “I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them.”

    Q9:5. But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, an seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practise regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful

    Q9:38. O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter.
    Q9:39. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place; but Him ye would not harm in the least. For Allah hath power over all things.

  • Una Salus

    Unfortunately most Jews and Christians would rather die than publicly acknowledge that Mohammad’s sword had their name on it.

  • Robbins Mitchell

    Awwww,that’s nothing…I used to know a Beaver named “Cleaver of Mayfield”

  • SandyLester

    islamics are death and have been for over 1,400 years

  • NJK

    Now, you know some govt. type will read this and say no, it’s not true, Islam is the religion of peace. I think they should say, Islam is the religion of pieces, as in body parts.

    • evoval

      Some govt. type will be using “Taqiyya” on the N. American Homer Simpson!
      Muslims are allowed to lie to unbelievers in order to
      defeat them.

      Taqiyya – Saying something that isn’t true. <—Who does this and has done nothing but this?

  • Ken Zevo

    Since others have phrased what I am thinking better than I can, or ever could, let me borrow their words here:

    “If Muhammad were truly a prophet, why did he make no provision in the Koran for his successor? Failing to do so triggered the great Muslim divide, following Muhammad’s death, of dueling Sunni and Shiite sects — one witnessing 1,400 years now of Muslim-on-Muslim violence. Muhammad left the door open for this violence by mandating any Muslim leaving the faith (apostate) should suffer death. As Sunnis and Shiites each perceive the other to be apostates, each therefore believes the Koran sanctions violence against the other.”

    “For this reason, although Islam directs hatred and non-tolerance at non-believers, history records more Muslims dying at the hands of fellow Muslims than non-believers.” James Zumwalt

    “If a soldier wants to enter into politics, he needs to forget the military; and the presence of a gun in politics means the end of all dialogue.”
    Sayed Hassan Khomeini, grandson of the late Ayatollah Khomeini

  • cheechakos

    The prophet of plagiarism,propaganda ,perversions ,profiteering ,proselytizing and property theft strikes again,on the 3rd vertebrae

  • Kira Des

    The depravity and innate violence of Islam is undeniable and clear as day. So is the intolerance and hatred its followers carry within themselves – as evidenced by 1400 years of bloody history (and present) of conquest and expansion via the sword. The only question is whether the non-muslims who deny these facts and appease muslims (aka dhimmis) are outright liars, deluded fools or a combination of both… and how we should deal with them for self-preservation.

  • MattBracken

    I’m sure that we can just learn to understand the Islamic State and get along and coexist with them. /sarc

    • Hamalot

      That little pic is quite correct. No connection. That guy in the orange…? He’s about to receive some peace from the servants of Allah the merciful.

  • Christopher Riddle

    ISLAM is”AGAINST”Be-Headings like Hershey’s is “AGAINST”Cocoa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Ken Zevo

    Mod? Could you plz remove this accidental double-post? Thx! (I hit the “delete” button … but all that did was change the name from “Ken Zevo” to “Guest”.)

  • http://atlantarofters.blogspot.com/ The Sanity Inspector

    If a somewhat humorous aside can be allowed, consider this anecdote from the French colonial wars of 180 years ago:

    After a skirmish, in which the French had been victorious, and many of the Bedouins lay apparently dead around, one of his Spahis, a very valiant negro, wished, for greater security, to cut off the head of one of those who lay near him,–a handsome young man, whose eyes, wide open, were apparently glazed in death. He had already drawn his yataghan for this purpose, when one of his comrades exclaimed, “Why are you going to give yourself the trouble of cutting off the dead man’s head? They don’t pay us for the heads any longer.” “That’s true,” answered the negro; who replaced his yataghan and rode off.
    About a year after this, when by chance the same negro was standing by the side of Marey, a deserter from the Bey of Constantine was brought in, who had come to beg for admission into the number of French Spahis. “I think I have seen you before,” said the colonel: “you were perhaps formerly in the French service?” “No,” answered the Arab, smiling; “but he who is now standing by you was once going to cut off my head, when I was pretending to be dead. Fortunately, however, he changed his mind.”
    The negro at first was very indignant at having such a trick played him. “But now,” continued the colonel, “they are excellent friends, and among my best people. They were the two whose skill I pointed out to you when you lately witnessed the manoeuvres.”

    – Prince Hermann Pückler-Muskau, Semilasso in Africa: Adventures in Algiers, and Other Parts of Africa, Volume 1, 1837

  • Patrick Adrien Varencaus

    hahaha good one

  • Piper Michael

    Mohammed has a name within Christianity as well…
    He is called; The False Prophet…

    Much of Islam,is revealed by the deception used to even define the word in the West( who are easily deceived because they WANT to be deceived.) After some research after 911, it became evident, that everybody was deceived about Islam. It is defined variously as meaning; PEACE or SUBMIT… but, its TRUE meaning can only be discerned by reading the original Arabic translation, which is;

    “There will be PEACE, when all the world SUBMITS to the will of allah.” (Little ‘a’ used to denigrate this false god and his false prophet.)

    There is only one way to interpret this.
    The Sleeper must awaken, or die.