Breivik Opposed Spencer, Fjordman, Exploited Counterjihad for Nazi Goals


Gates of Vienna has the full text of Breivik’s letter and in it he states that his manifesto, as he calls it the “compendium” was carefully selected to damage the people he opposed, namely Fjordman, he doesn’t mention Robert Spencer by name, but he is clearly included.

“The compendium was, among other things, of a calculated and quite cynical <<gateway-design>> (the 2+?+?=6-approach), created to strengthen the ethnocentrist wing in the contra-jihad movement, by pinning the whole thing on the anti-ethnocentrist wing,” Breivik writes.

“The idea was to manipulate the MSM and others so that they would launch a witch-hunt and send their <<media-rape-squads>> against our opponents. It worked quite well,” Breivik writes.

Breivik describes the anti-ethnocentrist wing as “represented by Fjordman and his Jewish network, the EDL-leader, the SIOE-leaders, Wilders, Farage etc.”

Not only was Fjordman not responsible for Breivik’s actions, but Breivik had deliberately sought to pin some of the responsibility for the attack on him.

“When the norwegian MSM announced that Fjordman was my role model and idol, they couldnt be more wrong,” Breivik writes.

Again, that goes double for Robert Spencer, as Breivik goes on to explain that he had always identified with Stormfront. “I was never kicked out of Stormfront. In stead, I attacked them in the compendium in order to protect them, as I knew the authorities would use the fact that I frequented the site, against them, and that an army of leftist journalists otherwise would strike hard.”

Breivik writes that he was merely exploiting the counter-jihad movement to feed Nazi material into nationalist parties.

“There has been an active power-struggle between the two factions within the contra-jihadist movement for years, and the reason why its so critically important to dominate and influence this movement is because it acts as a <<supplier of terms>> to moderate european nationalist parties with a base consisting of tens of millions of europeans. The battle within the <<counter-jihad>>-movement is in many ways a battle for the future content of northern-european nationalism.”

His endgame is, now, according to him, “a norwegian-nordic indigenous state located in Østfold, consisting of two percent of the norwegian territory. Its also a very small price to pay in order to end a 68 year old conflict.”

Breivik, as I wrote before, is delusional, and is still operating in an imaginary universe where he is a central figure in some pivotal struggle. But his identification was with the neo-nazis, not with the counterjihad.

  • objectivefactsmatter

    Front page news.

  • Fak_Zakaix

    I thought he is not Jewish.

  • Crusader Niels

    Apparently according to this article, the source for this letter came from a site which has a jew(Robert Aschberg) whose grandfather financed the jew Lenin as editor and is founded by radical communists, one of whom is a South Korean(Tobias Hübinette) who wants to genocide the white race above anything else, having said this:

    “To feel and even think that the white race is inferior in every conceivable way is natural with regards to its history and current actions. Let the Western countries of the white race perish in blood and suffering. Long live the multicultural, racially mixed and classless ecological society! Long live anarchy!”

    The site is basically about attacking “anti-semites”, “fascists” and “far-right groups” to help achieve their goal of killing off the white race.

    Considering all this I find it hard to believe that the letter they have on Breivik is not a fraud.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      Lenin wasn’t a Jew so you already have zero credibility.

      I’ll put more faith in Gates of Vienna than in you.

      • Crusader Niels

        Zero credibility?

        Before dismissing Lenin as a non-jew remember that Lenin’s maternal grandfather, ISRAEL Blank, was a jew, that’s a fact.

        He is definitely jewish, I leave it to personal opinion to how jewish you think he is.

        • Daniel Greenfield

          Lenin had German, Swedish, Jewish, Russian and possibly Kalmyk ancestry.

          He never identified as a Jew or practiced Judaism.

          You could get away with calling him of Jewish ancestry, but when you call him a Jew, you lose all credibility.

          • Crusader Niels

            “when you call him a Jew, you lose all credibility”

            As I said, it’s personal opinion whether or not you see quarter jewish as jewish, the Soviets themselves censored Lenin’s jewish ancestry. Besides that, the other major leaders during the revolution, Lev Bronstein(Trotsky) and Lev Kamenev were total jews.

            Marxism itself was created by Karl Marx(real surname: Mordechai) who was so jewish that both of his grandfathers were rabbi’s. Marx was even related to the founders of Israel as he was third cousin of Nathan Mayer Rothschild(father of Walter Rothschild). Of course there is also the fact that jewish bankers like Aschberg which I just mentioned and Jacob Schiff who gave 20 million dollar to the Soviet revolutionaries.

            Lastly there is also the murder of the Tsarist family, who were killed on order of the jews Lenin and Yakov Sverdlov by the jew Yakov Yurovsky.

          • Daniel Greenfield

            Nobody except a Nazi sees a man with German, Swedish, Jewish, Russian and possibly Kalmyk ancestry who did not practice Judaism and did not consider himself Jewish as a Jew.

            The Soviets fiddled with the ancestry of most of their leaders. It also tried to hide Lenin’s Kalmyk ancestry and played games with Stalin and Khrushchev’s ancestries.

            Karl Marx was a baptized Christian of Jewish ancestry who despised Jews as much as Hitler did.

        • Crusader Niels

          “Nobody except a Nazi sees a man with German, Swedish, Jewish, Russian and possibly Kalmyk ancestry who did not practice Judaism and did not consider himself Jewish as a Jew.”

          It seems to have been mighty important to the Soviet regime who censored it for decades from the Russian public.

          “Karl Marx was a baptized Christian of Jewish ancestry who despised Jews as much as Hitler did.”

          Marx’s jewish ancestry was about the only ancestry he had. All four of his grandparents were jews. He didn’t just had some jewish ancestry like Lenin, he was pure jewish in all but religion.

          Paternal Grandfather: Levy Mordechai, Rabbi of Trier

          Paternal Grandmoter: Eva Lwow, daughter of Moses ben Joshua Heschel Lwow, also a rabbi in Trier

          Maternal Grandfather: Isaac Pressburg, Rabbi in Nijmegen

          Maternal Grandmother: Nanette Salomon Barent Cohen, cousin of Hannah Barent-Cohen who married Nathan Mayer Rothschid(the first one).

          Churchill wrote about the problems of jewish communists too:

          • Daniel Greenfield

            Lenin was as Jewish as many of the crowned heads of Europe, which is to say he had a Jewish ancestor, among largely European ancestors.

            Despite your rather National Socialist view of Jewish genetics, there were prominent Nazis with a Jewish grandparent.

            The Soviet regime also censored Lenin’s Kalmyk ancestry.

            It also distorted Stalin’s ancestry and Khrushchev’s ancestry for reasons that had nothing to do with Jewishness, but a lot to do with its dysfunctional multicultural empire.

            Marx was of Jewish ancestry, but grew up baptized and despised Jews and Jewishness.

      • Crusader Niels

        By the way, I didn’t even say your source GoV was lying(it offered some valuable information as a matter of fact), however, their source, Expo, is a radical-communist magazine and one of their two co-founders wishes to snuff out the white race.

        Because the Expo magazine has a jewish editor I believe chances are high that they will try to smear etho-nationalists(who don’t like jews) and draw away negative attention from the zionistic counterjihad movement(which is largely controlled by jews) even if they have to use fake evidence.

        So far, all stories that I have seen that mention this letter all use the same radical-communist Expo as their source which is why I question it’s reliability.

        • Daniel Greenfield

          I’m not familiar with Expo, but GoV is far more familiar with the local situation than I am and I trust that they did the necessary research.

          Considering that Breivik is able to communicate with the outside world, there would be no point in a fake letter anyway as it would be exposed as a fraud.

  • snaphanen

    Crusader Niels:. What is the relevance of the people behind Expo to the content of the letter ? It was written months before it was sent to the media and Expo quoted it, and who says, GoV got it from Expo or that Expo ever recieved it from Breivik ?

    • Crusader Niels

      So far as I have seen, Expo is the first and only real source of this letter and I consider Expo unreliable because of it communistic ties. Breivik sending a letter that contains very important personal information just to people who are almost completely ideologically opposed to him seems kind of fishy, don’t you think?

  • snaphanen

    Crusader Niels: From which swedish source, GoV got the letter, I dont know. It was sent to about 30 international medias, and I doubt very much -expo was one of them.