Chicago Black Pastor Endorses Republican, Gets Death Threats, has Church Vandalized

corey_brooks_02

It’s the Chicago Way. “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.” If he endorses a Republican, we smash up his church.

Corey Brooks, who is pastor of a church on Chicago’s South Side, has been beset with hundreds of death threats after endorsing a Republican for Illinois Governor in the upcoming election. His church has also been vandalized by the more adult, more caring, more tolerant Democrats in the Windy City.

Pastor Brooks has endorsed first-time politician, businessman and Republican Bruce Rauner for governor instead of life-long political insider and incumbent Democrat Governor Pat Quinn. But since he went very public with his endorsement–including appearing in TV ads for Rauner–Brooks has been under siege by those “tolerant” Democrats who wish death upon him.

His church was also vandalized this weekend and large amount of money earmarked for charities was stolen.

Well I’m sure the money will be redistributed appropriately between ACORN, SEIU and a few of the right aldermen.

Brooks said he received the five phone calls on Friday. He recorded one of them, and provided it to police. In that call, which was played for the Sun-Times, a man’s voice is disguised via a high-pitched filter. He is heard calling Brooks a “token n—–.”

“We on you boy, we on you. And you ain’t got nobody that can stop us, nobody. Who you go [to] the deacons? They can’t stop us. We going to beat your fat a– in front of your mama congregation Sunday. Yeah we going to steal the sheep of the hypocrite. You’s a hypocrite we going to beat your fat a– in front of your own congregation. Who you got that…f— we going to beat their a– too. They can’t protect you. You sell out you Uncle Tom a– n—–. You token. You a puppet for Bruce Rauner you puppet n—– a–. P—- a– n—–,” the voice says on the recording.

A group of Chicago area black ministers, including Brooks, announced last month they’d support Rauner in the campaign. Brooks is featured in a Rauner ad which began airing two weeks ago on some channels, including BET. It began airing on network channels on Friday: “I believe it’s really time to change things up in the state of Illinois, especially on the South Side,” Brooks says in the commercial. He says he supports Rauner because he believes the Democratic party has taken advantage of African-Americans and hasn’t provided enough help for impoverished communities.

They sure are providing help now.

 

  • bob e

    poor guy .. tough at the other end of the gravy train ..

  • LuCha

    Caller should be more worried about his own grammar than this Pastor’s endorsement…geez…

    • MrUniteUs1

      Agreed. Sounds like a caricature.

      • http://www.stubbornthings.org NAHALKIDES

        Yes, your side does sound like a caricature, but that’s the way you really are. That caller was one of your kind (Lefty Democrats), and fairly typical.

        • MrUniteUs1

          Are you sure? The caller used a high pitch filter. He could have been anyone including yourself.

      • JayWye

        I’ve encountered people who talk just like that. REAL life.

  • 1970greenie

    When the New England Journal of Medicine published the article demonstrating that silicone implants did not cause autoimmune disease the then female editor received a call from NOW. “You have abandoned the cause!” Racism, or any other ‘ism’, is not about skin color. It is about ideology and preconceived notions that do not tolerate dissent.

  • Doug Saint Carter

    This is pure racial insanity. Is this what we get when we elect a black president, and have a racially divisive black attorney general? Along with a congressional black caucus that makes every thing about race. Someone within the black population needs to step up and soundly condemn this sort of nonsense.
    Too bad our president is more concerned about votes than humanity in America.
    This is a time when race relations should be improving, but their getting worse.
    We need to improve race relations by working towards racial unity, and strive for racial harmony to achieve a color kind America.

    • MrUniteUs1

      I do.

  • TAP

    Typical Chicago thuggery. Da calla need ta worri bout dem booolits in da soud siiiide.

  • MrUniteUs1

    The country gained millions of jobs during the Obama and Clinton years, and lost jobs during the Bush years. I usually vote for Democrats. Everyone should for the country. Democrats get things done. But if Republican rhetoric controls your thoughts over Democratic deeds then vote Republican.

    • http://www.stubbornthings.org NAHALKIDES

      To the extent things were good during the Clinton years, it was entirely due to Reagan’s tax cuts and the Republican Congress restraining Democratic spending. And no, we haven’t gained millions of jobs during the Obama years, although quite a few good professional full-time jobs have been exchanged for part-time minimum wage retail jobs, if you want to call that a success.

      Must be nice to just be able to make up your own facts.

      • MrUniteUs1

        Reagan tax cuts were followed by Reagan tax increases, and increases in government jobs. He hired over a million government workers. He also granted amnesty to illegals, and supported legalizing abortion long before Roe vs. Wade. He made a quick $2 million speaking in Asia right after he left office. They liked his trade policies.

        • NoelH

          Reagan tax cuts were followed in ’83, by huge increase in net government revenue and REAL private sector jobs. Where Reagan fell down is in negotiating with Tip O’Neill. He got the tax cuts but not so much the spending cuts. So, up went the debt. Of course, NOTHING like it’s been under Obama!

    • Scar

      According to the Bureau of Labor, Obama is the only president since 1945 to have a net loss in job numbers. Maybe you should re-check your sources. Oh, never mind…Democrat talking point don’t take facts into account.

    • glpage

      Clinton’s job gains came on the heels of sound economic policy of the two preceding administrations and policies from a Republican House.

      • MrUniteUs1

        “It’s the economy stupid”

        • NoelH

          Yeah, a minor ‘blip’ of downturn. it would have happened regardless who was in the WH or who got elected in’92. And would have recovered the same way. BTW, the first act signed by Clinton was raising taxes on Social Security recipients who worked side jobs for extra income. Classy guy, huh?

        • kasandra

          And how are black people doing in. They’re going to do even better with millions of illegals getting green cards. Way to go in shooting yourself in the foot, there.

      • NoelH

        Absolutely. Billy Jeff got the benefit of the policies of his predecessors. And the dot com boom.

    • JayWye

      “gained millions of jobs”,except that unemployment SOARED,over 15% of the working population are unemployed or underemployed,post-Bush. Many others are now working TWO jobs,because their old job is now limited to under 29 hours a week,thanks to Comrade Obama and the D-Rats.
      You can’t believe Comrade Obama’s phony employment numbers.

      We can’t believe anything YOU post,either. it’s GIGO.

    • Daniel_Greenfield

      The country didn’t gain jobs when accounting for population growth.

    • kasandra

      We have the lowest labor force participation rate since they began keeping records. How do you account for that? Also, half of the jobs created since Obama’s been in office are part time and/or minimum wage. The only people who have seen their income increase since Obama has been in office are the top 10 percent. While he talks about strengthening the middle-class, he’s killing it.

      • MrUniteUs1

        300,000 baby boomers retiring each month. Expect this to continue for another 10 years.

    • NoelH

      Great. We can all get minimum wage part-time jobs. yup, more work.

      • MrUniteUs1

        If minimum wage goes up. So will other wages. So will consumer spending and business revenue

        • kasandra

          Sure it will; sure it will. You keep believing it. Under your logic, if we raise the minimum wage to $50 an hour we’ll all be swimming in dough. Good luck with that.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Kassandra be original say $40 or $60. I tire of regurgitated responses.
            FYI. Developed countries have higher wages, and the poorest countries have no minimum wage.

          • truebearing

            I tire of your bullshit.

        • truebearing

          Then so will costs, which negates the benefit of the raised wages. The increase in wages also results in increased taxation, which is the real reason that statists want the increase. The net effect is less jobs being available and the net income remaining stagnant, or going down.

          I guess you don’t care about a decrease in the number of jobs. You get paid to troll.

    • bob smith

      hey, troll, answer me honestly. Are you paid by one of the odumbo wealth redistribution programs to troll here and spread BS AND RHETORIC?

      FYI moron, read this study and understand this, demoncrat policies are killing black families into ruinous poverty and despair in favor of immigrants. what’s more is that should odumbo implement executive order for amnesty, blacks will be pulverized by even greater poverty due to greater job loss…FACTS!

      http://cis.org/all-employment-growth-since-2000-went-to-immigrants

  • MrUniteUs1

    Wrong, wrong, wrong, No American should receive death threats for endorsing a candidate. However in my experience people that use the language heard on the recording don’t spend much time worrying about elections.

    • glpage

      I will agree with your first sentence. Can’t say I agree or disagree with the second. But it sure seems to me that anyone who threatens someone for endorsing the “wrong” candidate is very interested in the election and is doing what they think is necessary to have the election go the way they want.

      • MrUniteUs1

        As you can tell I like butting heads with Republicans, including the Black ones. Probably because I know I’m right. The story as presented sounds a bit fishy, but if true then again I say it’s wrong, wrong, wrong. Note I want both parties to compete for Black Americans. The more Americans working and earning a decent living the better.

        • kasandra

          You’ve been shown you’re wrong repeatedly just in the comments to this column. If you “know” you’re right you’re delusional.

    • ConTexTant

      MrDivideUs:

      Please provide me one instance where a Republican has threatened a Democrat.
      I can provide you two instances where Democrats have done it to Republicans:

      1. African-American, Kenneth Gladney, beaten by SEIU Union thugs in St. Louis. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wr_4ZWEFOjQ.
      (Ho hum. It’s okay when Democrats beat a black man [as they did for 200 years]. But let a Republican do it [I'm still waiting for your example] and it’s time to scream.)
      2. The Black Panthers intimidated people from voting in Philadelphia.
      http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2013/06/black-panther-boss-who-got-off-for-voter-intimidation-arrested/
      (Ho hum. It’s OK when Democrats stop people from voting…but if a Republican were to do it, it’s time to scream bloody murder [unless of course it’s Nathan Bedford Forrest hanging a black person from a tree…like he would have done with Harriet Tubman…but then it’s okay because Forrest was a Democrat and Tubman was a Republican.)

      So, go ahead and defend this. I’m sure you will. You’ll say it was justified…or it’s false…or some other way. Or just laugh and shake your head because you have nothing smart to say. Or just ignore it.

      Or, you might just have the glimmerings of “wisdom” start in you…

      Nahhh, you’ll just defend the indefensible. It’s easier than thinking.

  • MrUniteUs1

    Just for grins, tell some of right wingers that you might vote for a Democrat and note their reaction.

    • http://www.stubbornthings.org NAHALKIDES

      Those of us able to support ourselves have no reason to vote Democratic. Why would we want more of our income stolen and redistributed to Democratic supporters?

      • MrUniteUs1

        Just for grins try it then give us some feedback. Should be interesting.

    • glpage

      I’ve never see or heard a conservative threaten anyone who wants to vote Democrat. I have seen the conservative laugh or ask the person if they were serious or maybe even ask if they were sane. But never a threat of bodily harm.

      Watch the reaction when a conservative is scheduled to give a talk on a college campus. The lefties get their knickers in a twist and throw a big, ol’ piss off attack and in some cases have threatened the conservative speaker with bodily harm. Now, tell me about conservatives doing the same thing when some Marxist or Socialist is scheduled to give a talk on the same campus. You can’t, it doesn’t happen. Threatening political opponents seems to be almost exclusively a leftist thing.

      • MrUniteUs1

        Just for grins. Try it then give us some feedback.

  • http://www.aol.com/ Fongzilla1970

    As a young boy I lived in the South for a couple of years (1963-64) and I have never forgotten that it was the Democratic Party who was running that racist dollhouse down there.

    • MrUniteUs1

      Yep and those same Southern Democrats hijacked the Republican party after President Johnson signed the Civil Rights act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act into law in 1965.

      • http://www.aol.com/ Fongzilla1970

        I believe it was LBJ who himself blocked passage of it for years.

        • MrUniteUs1

          Yes he did. Dr. King helped change his mind.
          No excuse for denying Americans of any color their Constitutional right to vote.

          • http://www.aol.com/ Fongzilla1970

            There was no need for that legislative theater. Most if not all of the repressive laws should have been ruled as unconstitutional and struck down as infringement of individual Constitutional rights but that would have strengthened the Constitutional Republic which the Democrats have been attempting to undermine since their very creation as a political party.

          • MrUniteUs1

            For 100 hundred a years after the Civil war both parties failed to uphold the Constitutional rights of “the Negro” including the right to vote.

          • http://www.aol.com/ Fongzilla1970

            After the Civil War ended the Republican controlled Federal Government instituted Reconstruction in the South. There were free elections where the African-Americans had the vote and many were elected to offices. It was the Democrats who gained power and then reversed Reconstruction and began the KKK Apartheid South which existed for about 80 years protected by a Democratic majority party who for political expediency embraced the Dixiecrats.

            In 1864 the Democrats were disloyal subversive Copperheads supporting the South and 150 years later they are once again disloyal subversive Copperheads in support of Communist enslavement of the whole nation.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Thank McConnell, Bush, Reagan, and Hank Paulsen for our coming economic enslavement to Communist China.

          • http://www.aol.com/ Fongzilla1970

            I believe this was one of your goals from the late 1950s.

            “Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.”

          • USAPatriotSC

            The same mindset as the caller to the Pastor. All the facts are there but you are a permanent Liberal , you have been brainwashed and fed so many false facts you are permanently screwed up. You vote Party not people, you think Obama created so many jobs but where are they? Poverty is up, welfare is up, unemployment and benefits are up, the U6 is 21-22%, you are all hearsay, MSNBC and CNN facts. You do not look at anything objectively and see good where there is bad and bad where there is good.
            I will not argue with you or debate you, you are lost and beyond reachable. Most Blacks are and now they are waiting for the next disaster to come along and vote for them and keep lying to themselves that “things are better now”. You’re a pipedream voter out of touch with reality.

          • MrUniteUs1

            How are you doing? Are you able to get your clothes out of the cleaners?. Keep up with the bills?. Most Black Americans can. So stop whining every time some talking head making 6 or 7 figures whines about how terrible things are. Americans of all colors are buying $20,000 cars and $200,000 homes.

          • USAPatriotSC

            I am doing good but the Liberals this election are not, Blacks are voting against Democrats because of this miracle worker running the Country. The results don’t seem to match up with your rhetoric.

          • MrUniteUs1

            $300 for Jay Z and Kanye West tickets. Now that’s upsetting. But guess what sellout crowds.

          • truebearing

            That only proves people are stupid and have bad taste. Both of them are so overrated it is absurd.

          • kasandra

            There’s just no accounting for taste.

          • kasandra

            Gee, guess you’ve forgotten about the $7.5 billion in deficits, largely financed by borrowing from China, that Mr. Obama has run up in the last 6 years.

          • bob smith

            Sorry Kassandra, try better than $8 trillion, not billion. ;-)

          • kasandra

            Right you are. It is mind boggling, $8 trillion in debt in 6 years. Meanwhile he slashes the military and manned spaceflight program. Two trillion a year goes to “transfer payments” which disproportionately go to black people and still “Mr. Unite Us” complains on how terrible this country is.

          • bob smith

            Correct again. Swine such as mrunity feel it is their Devine right to feed at the proverbial tax payer trough as recompense for their ills.

            Truth is but an inconvenience for them. Keep up the good fight in showing these charlatans the truth. Cheers.

          • kasandra

            Yes, and according to eye witnesses, said after passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act (while on Air Force One) “Now them ni**ers will vote Democrat for the next 200 years.” Yeah, he became a real saint.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Do you have the names of the eye witnesses? No one else has. The internet rumor started decades after LBJ died. Don’t you think it would have been newsworthy back in the 1960′s if he really said that?

          • Scar

            Read “The Path to Power,” “Means of Ascent,” and “Master of the Senate” by noted historian Robert Caro. That should answer some of your questions about LBJ. And Caro bibliographs hundreds of documents and eye-witnesses, most of whom he interviewed for the trilogy. It’s great reading and Caro is an objective historian, but it doesn’t paint a flattering picture of your beloved Democrat Party. And by the way, I’m an Independent who understands that the main difference between the two major parties is blather. The Repubicans have been too timid to stand up to the Socialists (i.e. Democrats) for decades.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Do you have the names of the eye witnesses? No one else has, including Caro.

            The
            internet rumor started decades after LBJ died. Don’t you think it would
            have been newsworthy back in the 1960′s if he really said that?

          • Scar

            Wow, you’re a fast researcher! On a serious note, I never said he had an eyewitness to that particular comment. I was referring to the overall fraud and racism that permeated Johnson’s life. Did you know that he won a very close race for his Senate seat by paying migrant farm workers to vote for him? If you don’t believe me, read the books. If you have read them and you’re in denial, there’s nothing else I can suggest.

          • MrUniteUs1

            This false rumor was debunked years ago. No could come up with the name of anyone that heard Johnson say what he accused of saying.

          • Scar

            My, my, my…please read my last two posts in this discussion. My comments have absolutely nothng to do with the particular allegation to which you’re referring.

          • WhiteHunter

            I’ll bet you also deny that LBJ took a visitor down the hall, let him look into Thurgood Marshall’s office, pointed at Marshall, who was sitting at his big desk, and chuckled, “Just wanted you to see that the Solicitor General of the United States (the position Marshall held before he disgraced the Supreme Court) is a ni**er!”

            And don’t bother superciliously asking for the name of an “eyewitness” or “source.” Look it up yourself; if I served it up to you on a silver platter, you wouldn’t believe me anyway. And if you bother to find it and read it on your own, you still won’t, either.

          • MrUniteUs1

            According to Bob Woodards book, the Brethren . Johnson told Marshall, “I want folks to walk down the hall at the Justice department and see a ni**er sitting there.”

            Johnson appointed Marshall Solicitor General and Supreme Court Justice.
            http://whitehousetapes.net/exhibit/thurgood-marshall-lbj-johnson-tapes

          • kasandra

            Ronald Kessler, Inside the White House: The Hidden Lives of the Modern Presidents and the Secrets of the World’s Most Powerful Institution (Simon & Schuster, 1995) at 33 (quoting Robert M. MacMillan, Air Force One steward during the Johnson administration.

          • MrUniteUs1

            So Kessler said MacMillian said, 20 years after Johnson died. It;s possible. Found the passage from Kessler’s book. According to Kessler, Johnson was talking to Southern Democratic governors about his PROPOSED Civil Rights Bill. He was giving them a reason not to oppose the bill. “I will have them them ni**ers voting Democratic for the next 200 years.” is the quote from the book. Note the future tense “I will have…” and the word Democratic as in Democratic party.

          • kasandra

            And your point is????

          • MrUniteUs1

            Point made in previous post. Why did you mention LBJ?

          • kasandra

            Because you said MLK had changed LBJ’s mind on race. Obviously, he hadn’t. Now, are you going to apologize for claiming what I said, which is backed up by several sources, was a “false rumor?”

          • bob smith

            Mrunite himself is a chicken shi! liar. He didn’t reply to you on that slamming again because he is trolling here and simply doing his level best in his internet version of the knockout game.

          • bob smith

            odd reply for such a ‘well read’ individual as you who gleans all of his knowledge from “Google” and yet lays claim that LBJ’s known comment was just internet rumor.

            Do you just hit and then run? Is this your internet version of the knockout game?

      • kasandra

        Oh, I didn’t know Fulbright, Gore (Sr.), Wallace, Stennis, etc. all became Republicans. How odd I missed that. Strom Thurmond was the only Dixiecrat in the Senate to change parties as far as I recall. In fact, Wallace ran for the Democrat presidential nomination as a Democrat subsequent to the passage of the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts. I think he won the Michigan primary.

        • MrUniteUs1

          Which Wallace are you referring to?.

          • kasandra

            George.

          • MrUniteUs1

            K, You said all. I didn’t. See Southern Stragtegy and Lee

            George Wallace was governor of Alabama.
            He had a change of heart after white guy shot and paralyzed him.

          • celtnik

            Southern Strategy, there is no evidence of that either other than some anonymous source who said a Nixon staffer heard him say it. Nixon and Reagan both won 49 states, you do know that right?

          • MrUniteUs1

            Google Lee Atwater and the Southern Strategy.

          • MarilynA

            It’s easy to demonize the dead. Look at how J Edgar Hoover was branded a homosexual because some lefty claimed that as friend, who was then dead, had told her that she had seen Hover in drag. Not with standing the fact that there was a time, not so long ago, when civic organizations raised money by putting on skits called “womanless weddings” and “male beauty contests.”

          • celtnik

            Lee Atwater never came up with the alleged “Southern Strategy”. I am assuming you are referring to the 41 minutes of audio where he talks about it in the abstract? If you actually bothered to read it the central point that Atwater made in the interview was the exact opposite of the proposition for which liberals have endlessly quoted him. Google the number of Democrat Senators and congressmen who switched parties after the civil right act passed.

          • kasandra

            Let’s see if you can follow what is known as a train of thought. You said, “those same Southern Democrats hijacked the Republican Party.” I said that “I didn’t know Fulbright, Gore (Sr.), Wallace, Stennis, etc. all became Republicans.” So, you’re wrong. They didn’t become Republicans and hijack the party. Rather than admit that you were just spreading b.s. you say that staunch life-long segregationist and popular Democrat, George Wallace, who was shot in the midst of his campaign for the Democrat nomination for president, in which he won at least one northern presidential primary, had a change of heart after being shot. Does that in any way have anything to do with your blatantly false statement that Dixiecrats hijacked the Republican party or just more b.s. you spread around to try to obscure the facts?

          • MrUniteUs1

            Ever heard of Dixiecrats Strom Thurmond or Jesse Helms? They were among those that hijacked control of the Republican party. .

          • kasandra

            Helms was only elected as a Democrat with regard to a seat on the Raleigh City Council. He wasn’t a Dixiecrat and his first Senate campaign was as a Republican in 1973. So what you’re saying is that a Republican hijacked control of the Republican party. Is that what passes for logic in your world?

          • bob smith

            Well done Kassandra. He walked into a wall with you on his BS trail and you slammed him. Well done indeed!

          • kasandra

            Thank you. You are very kind.

      • NoelH

        Um, no. Republicans were the force behind the Civil Rights Act. The Dixiecrats opposed it. The name George Wallace ring a bell?

        • MrUniteUs1

          Most Northern Democrats and Republicans supported the Civil Rights Acts of 1865 and 1964. Most Southern Democrats and Republicans opposed. Yep Dixiecrats like Strom Thurmond and Jessie Helms opposed the Civil Rights Act. Then they the hijacked control of the Republican party. For your edification, Goldwater opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964.He carried his homestate of Arizona, Alabama, Mississippi,Georgia, and South Carolina. Johnson supported the Civil Rights act and won 45 states.

      • NoelH

        Name one Dixiecrat who became a Republican.

        • MrUniteUs1

          Storm Thurmond

          • kasandra

            And, despite what MrUniteUs1 implies elsewhere, he was the only one. Not Stennis, Fulbright, Gore Sr., Faubus, Wallace, Robert Byrd, Harry Byrd, nor any of the others went to the Republican party.

  • MrUniteUs1

    “Brooks said he received the five phone calls on Friday.”

    5 out of 2.7 million Chicago residents. Woooo!! Wait a minute that’s not a lot.

    “He recorded one
    of them, and provided it to police. In that call, which was played for
    the Sun-Times, a man’s voice is disguised via a high-pitched filter.”

    Hmm could have been anyone. Anyone who has access to a high-pitched filter.
    Maybe even a Republican.

    “A group of Chicago area black ministers, including Brooks, announced last month they’d support Rauner in the campaign.” Hmm yet only Brooks received phone calls.

    “Brooks is featured in a Rauner ad which began airing two weeks ago on some channels, including BET.” Hmm and received only 5 phone calls according the article. Something fishy about this.

    • Daniel_Greenfield

      How many death threats does he need to get to satisfy you?

  • NoelH

    WOW. For a party that has kept the black community needy, dependent, and hopeless, the Dems sure do get support. Is this some kind of Stockholm syndrome? Successful, independent black people scare them, and the level of rage is utterly illogical. Ok, folks, keep voting Democrat, and someday, someday, someday… isn’t the operational definition of insanity doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome? How did black America get so deceived, and enraged when you point out the errors in their thinking? Is it some sort of brainwashing? I don’t get it.

    • MrUniteUs1

      Does the same thing apply to the majority of Jews, Asians, and Hispanics?

      Most of them vote for Democrats.

  • MrUniteUs1

    Most Black Americans are not on welfare and most welfare recipients are not Black. In fact millions of welfare and food stamp recipients are whites.Whites also benefit from billions in government subsidies every you. So do your comments also apply to whites.

    • cree

      Try using per capita statistics. Pass it on; they deserve the truth, they deserve better, wouldn’t you agree?

      • MrUniteUs1

        What percentage of the stories about welfare refer to whites on welfare ? Near zero.
        Millions of whites on welfare. When is the last time you saw a story about whites on welfare. Why do you pretend they don’t exist?

        • truebearing

          Per capita — look it up — blacks are the largest group of welfare recipients.

          Per capita, blacks commit the most crimes in nearly every category, with the ironic exception of white crime.

          Are facts racist?

        • cree

          I’m not pretending they don’t exist. I know millions of whites are on welfare, much more so since Obama has been the oligarchy head of the most dismal recovery since the depression that, sound economic recovery economists have been blaming on democrat policies before and since the crash (uh, Detroit, for only one example).

          I don’t know personally, although I’m sure someone out there has the statistics on those whites on welfare and probably most of them vote democrat, the welfare plantation party.

          I think last I read, blacks make up 13% of the population. I read not to long back (didn’t document it), that per capita, the percentage of blacks on welfare is much more than that of whites. Why should that be? It shouldn’t. Can you imagine how much MLK’s character plea would improve if blacks discovered conservatives are their better reason for hope than what they’ve been dealt the last 50 years (actually, longer than that; republicans didn’t start and support the KKK)?

          Do your own research, compare claims, find the truth.

    • kasandra

      But blacks, comprising 13% of the population, receive a disproportionate 39% of welfare benefits. So, they are three times more likely to be recipients than their representation in the population. To put it another way, they are having a disparate impact on the welfare budget.

      • MrUniteUs1

        Once again, like the media, and talk radio, no mention of the millions whites on welfare, even though the percentage of welfare recipients in some states exceeds 90%. Also the amount paid per recipient is higher in those states. Any comments about whites on welfare?

        “But blacks…” Strange you are still mentally incapable of drawing a line of demarkation between the majority of Black Americans that do not receive welfare and the minority that do. You simply say “blacks” as if we all receive welfare. You aarre also fail to make any reference to the millions of whites on welfare. Welfare recipients in some states Most of the money spent on welfare goes to admistrators, and contractors. You should also know that corporate welfare more than doubles social welfare. Almost all corporate welfare and farm subisidies goes to whites. Some Congressmen receive over a million dollars in farm subsidies.

        • kasandra

          Yes, I admit it. There are whites on welfare. Did I ever deny that? No. As for the rest of your rant, you are delusional. I never said or implied that all blacks are on welfare. But it is beyond cavil that a higher percentage of blacks are on welfare than their percentage representation in the population. That is what is known as fact. Are you denying it?

          • MrUniteUs1

            Finally you admit their whites own welfare. In fact their are millions of whites on welfare. Billions paid out to whites welfare each year. Now search internet and you will hard press to find anyone white discussing anyone white on welfare. Why do you suppose that is? Why don’t whites want to discuss whites on welfare.

            The fact there is a higher percentage of blacks are on welfare than their percentage representation in the population, is common knowledge. Are the facts that the majority of Blacks are not welfare and the majority of people on welfare are not Black common knowledge?

          • kasandra

            I did not admit that “whites own welfare.” Try reading. I said of course there are whites on welfare and I’m no happier about that than you should be about the level of blacks on welfare. And no, I haven’t done a Nexus check for stories on whites or blacks on welfare. Do your own research. Your method of argument is very interesting. You put arguments that were never made into the mouths of people who didn’t make them and they you attack them for things they never said. I said “interesting.” What I should have said is “irritating.”