Clinton Judge Bans Black Man from Criticizing the NAACP

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. He is completing a book on the international challenges America faces in the 21st century.


NAACP-BLACK-BEAUTIFUL-BILLBOARD

This can’t be considered racist because the man doing it is black. So the NAACP has to default to Plan B. Plantation politics.

A federal judge has ordered Ryan Bomberger to stop making fun of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. The Court effectively ruled that Bomberger and his group, The Radiance Foundation, are not very funny.

Himself African-American, Bomberger and many other pro-life campaigners have called attention to the inordinate percentage of abortions performed on African-American babies and have wondered why the NAACP not only does not campaign to stop it, but is cozy with pro-abortion initiatives including endorsing the massive abortion march in Washington, D.C., in 2004.

Bomberger, who founded The Radiance Foundation, created a series of ads for billboards and websites calling attention to what he sees as the support of the NAACP for abortion. In them Bomberger referred to the NAACP as the “National Association for the Abortion of Colored People.”

Now that’s obviously legally protected. It’s satirical exaggeration. But free speech and liberalism go together like oil and water.

Judge Randy Jackson, a Clinton judge, ruled against Bomberger. Jackson has a history of anti-free speech rulings. And he’s been overruled before because like so many Clinton and Obama judges, he makes up his own laws.

Jackson wrote that,

“The NAACP has demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that consumers are likely to be confused about whether “National Association for the Abortion of Colored People” is sponsored, authorized by or otherwise affiliated with the NAACP, and there is a high likelihood of confusion involving Radiance’s use of “NAACP” and a colorable imitation of “National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.”

The NAACP apparently thinks its members are mentally retarded and can’t tell the difference between its name and that of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.

Judge Randy Jackson apparently agrees that NAACP members are mentally retarded. So we have a Federal court ruling that NAACP members are too stupid to walk and chew gum at the same time.

The NAACP has established that it is entitled to a permanent injunction because it suffered irreparable reputational harm, the public has been confused or misled, and such an injunction would not constitute content-based restriction on free speech

… here’s your Freedom of Speech according to the Democratic Party.

The Court also decided that it would sully the reputation of the NAACP to be known as supportive of abortion. NAACP CEO Benjamin Jealous issued a statement that the NAACP does not support abortion but only a “woman’s right to choose.”

The right to choose… abortion. That’s what the right to choose means. The default is not aborting babies. The choice is to abort them.

If the NAACP supports the ‘right to choose’, it supports abortion. Tellingly all these new liberal rights end up eliminating actual rights… like Freedom of Speech.

Bomberger told Breitbart News that the court “completely ignored many of the facts we submitted” supporting the claim in his parody ads that the NAACP supports abortion. His group is considering an appeal to the Fourth Circuit, and one legal expert told Breitbart News the chances for a successful appeal are very good for a whole host of reasons including the fact that the judge in the Bomberger case has been overturned “many times.”

The Court ordered a permanent injunction against Bomberger and The Radiance Foundation and enjoined him and his group from “engaging in any course of conduct with respect to the NAACP” trademark. Bomberger has until this Friday “to deliver up for destruction all goods, advertisements, labels, signs, prints, packages, wrappers, receptacles, computer memory, data, computer programs, software, or any other media, and all other materials in its possession or under its control bearing the NAACP Marks or any other mark containing the terms ‘NAACP’ or ‘The National Association for the Abortion of Colored People.’”

After May 24th, Bomberger may never again publicly use the phrase “National Association for the Abortion of Colored People.”

Does anyone seriously think this would have happened to a liberal group that called itself the Nation Rifle Association for School Shootings?

Obviously not.

There’s no Freedom of Speech under liberalism. Only license for the left.

  • Steve Fair

    Good for Judge Jackson. The rightwing and their black Uncle Tom flunkies will learn soon enough that their slander and McCarthyite tactics will NOT be tolerated.

    • glpage

      Yeah, I really love it when leftists stomp all over the Constitution. And especially when it’s an obviously egregious action that shows them as the true, current day practitioners of McCarthyism. Because, hey, who needs to know what the left is all about.

      • JackSpratt

        And today we know that McCarthy was right, although he grossly underestimated the numbers of communist spies operating in our government. But he was right about their prominence in the State Department and how they were driving American foreign policy.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      Nothing says Uncle Tom like preventing black people from being killed.

      • Steve Fair

        Sorry Greenfield but abortion is legal and not murder. How come the only time rightwingers care about black folks is before they are born?

        • Davros11

          Because once they are, they become welfare children that the rest of America has to support! Get off the liberal plantation fool!

          • Steve Fair

            Thanks for your contribution racist.

          • Notalibfool

            There you go again with that racist thing! Wow you have such a one-track mind!

          • 95Theses

            Hey, Steve! It took you 25 minutes to get around to using
            the epithet “racist”. Having a slow day?

          • Notalibfool

            Uh-oh. Asking Steve if he’s having a slow day is RACIST!

          • 95Theses

            Of course! If he didn’t, somebody should take his temperature.

          • 95Theses

            However, distinguishing which end is which might prove to be challenge! Ha ha!

          • 1stworlder

            You mean which end has more things enter it, I guess he is on the down low like bathhouse barry

          • 1stworlder

            He was posting it on other articles and lost track of which he was on.

          • Ghost

            I’m a racist and couldnt care less what you or any other bab 00n thinks about it.

          • Steve Fair

            Good for you. Now go pump up the tires on your house.

        • iluvisrael

          so it doesn’t bother you that in NYC more black babies are aborted than born? or that planned parenthood has always strategically set up shop in inner city hoods to go after their intended target: blacks, just like margaret sanger wanted. You probably have a poster of kermit gosnell in your bedroom

          • Steve Fair

            That’s a lie.

          • Secret Person

            It’s clear that you are as much an idiot as members of the NAACP.

          • JackSpratt

            I doubt very much if this doofus has ever heard of Margaret Sanger, or that she was both a communist and a racist. Or that she founded Planned Parenthood.

        • 1stworlder

          Condi Rice, Colon Powel, Herman Cain, and the Black pediatric Neurosurgeon that made fun of Bathhouse Barry at the national day of prayer all attained jobs that affirmative action cant place people in.

          • JackSpratt

            Colon Powell is affirmative action. But there are: J.C. Watts. Walter Williams, Janice Rogers Brown, Shelby Steele, Lee Elder, Thomas Sowell, Allen West, Lynn Swan, Ken Blackwell, et al.

          • Steve Fair

            LMAO!!!!! Black conservatives are classic tokens. Gaining exposure and prominence simply by being the few blacks dancing to the rightwing agenda. They have no influence among their own people and serve only as useful idiots for white racists.

          • American Patriot

            Many white leftists like Tim Wise are tokens and serve as useful idiots for black racists like you, you dumb a**hole. Unlike white leftists, black conservatives are patriots to this country.

        • pfbonney

          Abortion is legal AND IS MURDER.
          An abortion ends the life of a human being. Life begins at conception.

    • Drakken

      Yeah that 1st Amendment thingy is so hard isn’t it?

      • Steve Fair

        Ist Amendment doesn’t protect slander.

        • 95Theses

          This message brought to you by the law office of U.N. Fair, Esq.

        • CDM

          Slander is legally defined as stating something about someone that is patently false. What here is untrue?

          • Steve Fair

            The NAACP doesn’t promote or perform abortions. Only supports a woman’s right to choose.

          • CDM

            Choose what? Abortion, perhaps? Don’t try sophistry on me.

          • Steve Fair

            Nobody is forced to get an abortion. The Supreme Court has supported it’s legality. What are you righties yapping about? If you don’t believe in abortion, don’t get one. Duh.

          • CDM

            I don’t know if you can safely say that “nobody” has been forced into abortion. Of course, the infant in this case has no say in the matter of whether they want to live or not.

            There is a fine line between abortion and infanticide. That the Supreme Court thought that they could draw such a line is the height of hubris. I might draw a different line and you might draw another. The point is that what we are talking about is the taking of a human soul. When do we acquire a soul? I don’t know and neither do you and neither did the Supreme Court.

          • JackSpratt

            Atheists don’t worry about such “perochial” things as souls.

          • 95Theses

            Reminds me of what a friend once quipped to me after seeing a bumper sticker expressing exactly those sentiments:
            If you’re against abortion, don’t have one.

            My friend:
            If you’re against slavery, don’t own one.

            Legality and morality are not the same, and are oftentimes diametrically opposed.

          • Steve Fair

            One man’s morality is another’s oppression. The problem with your analogy is that slavery has been outlawed in America for well over a century. Abortion is legal and constitutionally protected.

          • 95Theses

            Robert Bork once said, “‘You can’t legislate morality.’
            Indeed … we legislate little else.”

            http://www.utexas.edu/law/journals/tjclcr/abstracts/132/Maurer.pdf

          • Steve Fair

            Yeah Bork. The Judge who opposed Civil Rights and fired the Watergate Special Prosecutor. A real POS. Thank God he didn’t get on the high court.

          • American Patriot

            What about the current Supreme Court justice who made the “Wise Latina” comment at a university? What do you think about that comment?

          • Secret Person

            There are few bigger POSs than you. Holder and Obozo come to mind. I think I have to scrap you off the bottom of my shoe.

          • CDM

            And before 1865, slavery was legal and constitutionally protected. And before 1954, segregation was legal and constitutionally protected. So what’s your point? That morality and legality are one in the same?

            If abortion proponents were so sure that they represented the popular morality, why did they short-circuit the democratic process by going to the Supreme Court instead of taking their case to the people? The answer is that it’s easier to sway nine judges than fifty state legislatures.

          • 95Theses

            Amen, brother.

          • Steve Fair

            And if conservatives had their way both slavery and segregation would still be legal but abortion outlawed. Talk about screwed up priorities.

          • 95Theses

            I was wondering how long it would take for you to play The
            Race Card! Ha ha!

          • Notalibfool

            It’s the only card he has!

          • CDM

            I take this ad hominem as an admission that you realize that you have lost this argument.

          • Steve Fair

            You can take it any way you want. Abortion is legal and a woman’s right to choose. Case closed.

          • Notalibfool

            Case closed, huh? Doesn’t the father have any rights in the matter?

            Dang, you follow the leftist narrative word-for-freaking-word. Try to do some research and form some of your own ideas.

          • 95Theses

            Otherwise known as an exercise in futility.

          • Arkady Renko

            “Shut up!”, he explained.

          • 95Theses

            What a memory you have! In case you haven’t noticed, Republicans waged the war against slavery AND oppose abortion. What do they both have in common? The respect for the dignity of human life … the imago Dei … whatever the age or color.

          • Steve Fair

            Don’t try this sophistry on me. The Republicans who opposed slavery and supported Civil Rights were liberals and moderates. Barry Goldwater took the GOP to the right after 64 in opposition to Civil Rights and took 90% of the Southern Segregationists with them.

          • 95Theses

            Percentage-wise, there were more Republicans who voted for the 1964 civil rights act than there were Democrats. That, by the way, is called history. You should try it!

          • Steve Fair

            Once again for the intellectually challenged, the Republicans who supported Civil Rights were liberals and moderates. I challenge you RIGHT HERE to name one CONSERVATIVE who supported Civil Rights. Reagan, Thurmond, Goldwater, and Buckley all OPPOSED Civil Rights along with the Southern Segregationists who were rightwingers who eventually left the Democratic party.

          • Notalibfool

            You sure do love insulting everyone’s intelligence, don’t you? Is it because you are trying to compensate for your own idiocy or are you so high and mighty that you can’t accept other points of view?

          • CDM

            Strom Thurmond, at the time, was a Democrat. As to your other assertions, it’s not up to us to prove that they’re false, it up to you to prove that they’re true.

            And damn you for making me register for this site.

          • Steve Fair

            thurmond became a Republican in opposition to the Democratic support for the Civil Rights Act. What part of this are you struggling with?

          • CDM

            Now we get to the heart of the matter. Steve believes that white people spend their entire lives plotting on holding down the black man. Steve believe that things like paying our bills and getting our kids to school on time are all secondary to this.

          • Steve Fair

            I said nothing about white people. I was talking about conservatives vs liberals. Are you implying that blacks don’t pay bills or love their kids. Keep digging that hole pal.

          • Secret Person

            Well we do know that blacks commit 50% of murders in the US and that the black community doesn’t give a sh it.

          • American Patriot

            You don’t, you a**hole. All you do is post lies about people and politics in general.

          • Notalibfool

            And all of that serves as evidence that Steve himself is a racist.

          • JackSpratt

            I addressed this up above, but again, why would any segregationist join the party that had just voted in larger percentages for the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act, than the party they were in?
            Now if they were anti-communists, sure they would have moved to the republican party, as the democraps were turning more and more communist.

          • NonPCconservative

            So you say that Thurmond went from the party with 61 percent support to the party for 80 percent support for the Civil Rights Act because of his opposition to it. That makes perfect sense if you are an imbecile.

          • Steve Fair

            ““From now on, the Republicans are never going to get more than 10 to 20 percent of the Negro vote and they don’t need any more than that… but Republicans would be shortsighted if they weakened enforcement of the Voting Rights Act. The more Negroes who register as Democrats in the South, the sooner the Negrophobe whites will quit the Democrats and become Republicans. That’s where the votes are.” Kevin Phillips, Nixon Political Strategist 1970

          • American Patriot

            That quote is fake and has been debunked several times throughout the last 40 years, you race-obsessed a**hole. How many times do I have to remind you that MOST OF THE SOUTHERN SEGREGATIONISTS WHO LOST THE BATTLE AGAINST CIVIL RIGHTS REFORM FORMED THEIR OWN PARTY, THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE PARTY, WHICH DOESN’T EXIST ANYMORE?! Most contemporary Democrats came from the New Left movement, not the Republican Party, you racist dunce. And I already explained how the New Left movement achieved the contemporary Democrats’ monopoly over black voters.

          • Steve Fair

            The truth only hurts for a second Jethro. LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!

          • American Patriot

            You post nothing but lies, Tyrone. You are a racist a**hole who posts nothing but nonsense. Meanwhile, there are many contemporary Democrats (most of who came from the New Left movement and not from the GOP) who appeal to black racists and their supporters like you. You are the combination of Marcus Garvey, Elijah Muhammad, Louis Farrakhan, Khalid Abdul Muhammad, Al Sharpton, Keith Ellison, Robert Mugabe and other black racists, you racist lowlife.

          • Steve Fair

            FPM is engaging in censorship but I will continue to post this. Lee Atwater confirms the GOP strategy for appealing to white racists. http://www.thenation.com/article/170841/exclusive-lee-atwaters-infamous-1981-interview-southern-strategy#

          • American Patriot

            The Nation magazine engages in censorship and libels against conservatives and other patriots. And I will remind you again how Jesse Jackson’s strategists confirm the Democratic strategy for appealing to black racists and other left-wing anti-Semites.

          • Steve Fair

            Let’s see Jackson’s quote confirming your assertion. Like I posted a tape of Atwater’s actual WORDS. Take all the time you need goober.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Running a half black man for President – knowing that a majority (turned out to be 95%) of black voters would go out to vote for a “Brotha”.

            The DNC won’t be running another “Brotha” in 2016.

            And the country will be ready for a change from the DNC lies and massive unemployment – hidden by false stats which ignore those who gave up looking for work – and the increase of people on assisstence.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            The Troof only hurts for a seconds Steppin’. LMBFAO!!!!!!!

          • 95Theses

            CDM you can provide all the proof that exists to any of
            Fair’s “challenges” but he never answers them. He just ignores them and moves on to the next race-obsessed insult.

          • Steve Fair

            Still waiting for your “proof”.

          • Notalibfool

            Still waiting for your next hilariously stupid comment! :)

          • 95Theses

            You won’t have to wait long.

          • Notalibfool

            All he ever posts is “blah, blah, blah, racist, blah, blah blah, racist,…..”

          • 95Theses

            You left out ‘racist’ and ‘liar’. (That is to say, not enough ‘racist’s in there.)

          • Notalibfool

            He loves to call people stupid, racist, and liar, three words that describe him to tee.

          • ahad_ha_amoratsim

            “He told me I wasn’t being cooperative.
            I thanked him for noticing and invited him
            to try holding his breath till he saw me change.”
            - John Ciardi

          • 95Theses

            Sorry. Guess that poem was a little too esoteric for me. Care to enlighten and how it is pertinent?

          • ahad_ha_amoratsim

            Not all that much (though I rather enjoyed the poem) only that Steve Fair and Unbalanced, by reminding you that he is still waiting for your proof, is telling you that you are not being cooperative, and I was offering a suggestion as to how he might profitably occupy his time until he notices a change.

          • 95Theses

            Got it. Thanks.

          • JackSpratt

            Proof above!

          • JackSpratt

            I addressed this above. But yes there were in fact democraps who left that party and became republicans. Three notables were Reagan, Bill Bennet and Jean Kirkpatrick. BUT, they never left the democrap party because they were racists, they left the democrap party because it had made a huge turn towards communism. Reagan used to say: I never left the democrap party, it left me. The democraps have since that time continually moved further and further left.
            I know common sense is not your strong suit, but try this: why would segregationists move to a party that had just voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act by much larger margins (percentages) than the party they were already in?? Answer: they wouldn’t, it was all about leftism, national defense, etc..

          • JackSpratt

            Gawd this site is fkd up. I made this post way up above. And the last 2 days it’s taking 10 minutes for each comment.

          • JackSpratt

            2nd Amendment, and the constitution were also big reasons that dems left the democommie party.

          • Steve Fair

            Because the GOP POTUS nominee in 1964, Barry Goldwater, wsa rabidly anti-Civil Rights and took the party to the right afterwards. Appealing to white racism and resentment, turning the racist South solidly Republican, culminating in Ronald Reagan’s election in 1980. And Reagan also was rabidly anti-Civil Rights. I know how much facts offend you.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            You should kiss LBJ.

          • ahad_ha_amoratsim

            He not only tries it, he makes his own!

          • 95Theses

            Historical Steve-isionism

          • ahad_ha_amoratsim

            Combined with macroaggression.
            Maybe we should just call it the Fairness Doctrine.

          • CDM

            You forgot George Wallace who ran for President in ’68. He was a Democrat and an out and out segregationist.

          • Steve Fair

            Wallace ran as a Third Party candidate in 1968 in direct opposition to the Democrats. Checkmate.

          • unionville

            He ran as a pro-segregationist, pro-union, anti-right to work law, “I’m going to withdraw the troops from Vietnam if I win” candidate. Yes, he was clearly running in opposition to the democrats. Clearly wooing the conservatives with that list.

          • American Patriot

            Yes. He ran as an candidate on the American Independence Party (the party most segregationists formed when they lost their battle against civil rights reforms), which doesn’t exist anymore. So, what’s your point?

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            George Wallace was the DEMOCRAT Governor of Alabama when he opposed school integration.

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Wallace

            Checkmate.

            Robert Byrd DEMOCRAT of West Virginia was a member of the KKK.

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Byrd

            Abraham Lincoln was a REPUBLICAN.

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abe_Lincoln

            Steppin’, were you home schooled in a crack house?

          • JackSpratt

            That was the party of segregation.

          • 95Theses

            Here’s some history on the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act that you will find inconveniently truthful (hmmm, that expressions sounds faintly familiar) PROVING that Republicans have a better history on civilrights than do Democrats.

            1964 Civil Rights Act vote tally
            By Party

            The original House version:
            Democratic Party: 152–96 (61–39%)
            Republican Party: 138–34 (80–20%)

            Cloture in the Senate:
            Democratic Party: 44–23 (66–34%)
            Republican Party: (27)–6 (82–18%)

            The Senate version:
            Democratic Party: 46–21 (69–31%)
            Republican Party: (27)–6 (82–18%)

            The Senate version, voted on by the House:
            Democratic Party: 153–91 (63–37%)
            Republican Party: 136–35 (80–20%)

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964#Vote_totals

            In terms of ratios, that would be 4:1 for Republicans and 1.7:1 for Democrats.

            Statistics can be Fun!!

          • 95Theses

            Ruh-roh! Steve-o.

          • Steve Fair

            95Theses, stop playing, will you? Please name a CONSERVATIVE who supported the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

          • JackSpratt

            Answer my question that I asked twice above Steve. Why would a segregationist leave the democap party for a party that voted in far larger percentages for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965??

          • Steve Fair

            Because the GOP POTUS nominee in 1964, Barry Goldwater, was rabidly anti-Civil Rights and took the party to the right afterwards. Appealing to white racism and resentment, turning the racist South solidly Republican, culminating in Ronald Reagan’s election in 1980. And Reagan also was rabidly anti-Civil Rights. I know how much facts offend you.

          • American Patriot

            That’s BS once again, you racist a**hole. The reality is that Goldwater was not an opponent of civil rights, you dunce. He desegregated the Arizona State National Guard about two years before Harry Truman desegregated the United States Armed Forces. Goldwater’s main reason for voting down the 1964 Civil Rights Act was for reasons of governmental power, not for race relations at all. He feared that some in the government would one day abuse civil rights legislation to benefit their own power (as we have seen the Holder Justice Department abuse laws and policies to advance its own agenda). So, your smears against Goldwater are totally false. Likewise, Reagan was the exact opposite of a racist, you racist lowlife. Under Reagan, the administration tackled more civil rights cases than under your beloved Jimmy Carter. And by the way, it was Reagan who signed legislation declaring Martin Luther King, Jr. Day as a federal holiday. Why don’t you denounce Jimmy Carter, who before making a fool out of himself on the world stage by supporting horrible dictators and condemning democratic states like Israel, was a self-described “redneck” who while governor of Georgia during the 1970s, praised his racist lieutenant governor, Lester Maddox, as “the essence of the Democratic Party”. Carter has never denounced Maddox during his political career. And by the way, how many times do I have to remind you that the Southern segregationists who lost their battle against civil rights reform during the 1960s left the Democratic Party to form their own political party, the American Independence Party (which doesn’t exist anymore), and that most contemporary Democrats came from the New Left movement and not from the Republican Party?

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            “Please name a CONSERVATIVE who supported the Civil Rights Act of 1964.”

            Lyndon Baines Johnson.

          • JackSpratt

            Sorry bub, but the only segregatoinist who left the democommies and went republican was, Strom Thurmond. All the rest, including Al Gore, Sr, William Fullbright (Klinton’s mentor), and Robert Byrd (klan recruiter), remained democommies.
            Since 80% of republicans in both Houses of congress voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and 94% of republicans in the Senate and 82% in the House voted for the 1965 Voting Rights Act, you are full of crap! Democraps voted in much smaller percentages in both Houses, both years..

          • American Patriot

            Even then, didn’t Strom Thurmond eventually renounced racism and bigotry, didn’t he? And didn’t he vote in favor of Clarence Thomas to be a Supreme Court Justice in a vote that was the closest margin in Senate confirmation voting history regarding the appointment of nominees to the Supreme Court. Uptownsteve ignores the fact that most contemporary Democrats came from the New Left movement, not the GOP. The Southern segregationists who lost their battle against civil rights reforms during the 1960s left the Democratic Party to form their own party, the American Independence Party, which doesn’t exist anymore. The fact is that today, the GOP is the main classical liberal (modern conservative) party, while the Democrats are the main left-wing party.

          • JackSpratt

            Tis true indeed!!!

          • Steve Fair

            Sigh. The Sponsors of the 1964 Civil Rights Act were all Democrats. LBJ, Humphrey in the Senate, Celler and Powell in the House. Anyway you slice the pie, the supporters of the CRA were liberals and moderates of both parties. The opponents were conservatives. Today the GOP is a rightwing party. Once again, I challenge you to name ONE conservative who supported Civil Rights or Voting Rights. Put up or shut up.

          • Secret Person

            As LBJ said, “I’ll have them ni gg ers voting Democratic for two hundred years.”

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            LBJ was conservative – compared to what passes for a democrat today.

          • Steve Fair

            LBJ was a New Deal liberal.

          • American Patriot

            Yes, but so was Reagan. The New Deal liberals would be modern conservatives today. I have already mentioned that the New Left movement took over the Democratic Party in the late 1960s and early 1970s. When the New Left took over the Democratic Party, it destroyed the classical liberalism that existed in the Democratic Party. After the New Left takeover, the Democrats became a primarily left-wing party. Today, the GOP is the classical liberal (modern conservative) party while the Democrat Party is the left-wing party.

          • Secret Person

            Don’t confuse Steve with facts. To him, if 20% of Republicans voted against the Civil Rights Act then that means that they are ALL racists. It’s lib logic and you can’t reason with idiots like that.

          • 1stworlder

            Abe Lincoln was a victim of “knockout king” when he was 19 but still freed the slaves. He did buy land in Africa to move them back to.

          • JackSpratt

            Um, the only reason slavery and segregation doesn’t exist today is because of republicans, dork.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Abe Lincoln. Republican.

          • 1stworlder

            living on welfare is better than being in the top 1% of natives of black nations, the last king of Rwanda lives in VA on welfare getting better free healthcare than you could buy in his homeland.

          • Drakken

            You really need to get out of the hood and put the bong pipe down son, your talking out of your azz because your mouth knows better again.

          • JackSpratt

            In the last 50 years the only way the left has sought to amend the constitution is by judicial activism, save for one instance, the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), which even though the time period was illegally extended, went down to defeat. They know their leftwing agenda is so unpopular, that they don’t bother trying to amend it properly. They have nothing but contempt for the U.S. constitution. It is always getting in their way

          • ahad_ha_amoratsim

            I hope you’re not saying that slavery would be okay if it were legal. A lot of people gave their lives to make it illegal.

          • JackSpratt

            One of the things the Founders thought and said was that it was not just judges who could or should interpret the Constitution. No place in the constituiton will anyone find a right to abortion. And from study of the Founders, we know putting it in there would be anathema. We also know that if it had been put in there, the citzens would not have ratified the Constitution. The only proper (legal) way that a a right to abortion could be put there is by amending the document in the proper way. 2/3 majority of congress to send it to the states where it needs 3/4 majority to effect ratification. Tyrannically “amending” the constitution by way of judicial activism, executive order, or legislation is grounds for redress in a HUGE way.

          • iluvisrael

            go to blackgenocide.org – maybe a delusional lemming like you can learn something

          • ahad_ha_amoratsim

            That’s exactly how I feel about gun control. Don’t believe in gunds? Don’t get one. Duh.

          • Steve Fair

            Gun control is about background checks and registration. Duh.

          • JackSpratt

            Gun Control is about hitting your target. Nothing else!!
            The NRA is the oldest Civil Rights Organization in the U.S.

          • NonPCconservative

            Gun control is actually about keeping your sights aligned with the target and squeezing the trigger. The things that you mention are “person” control.

          • ebonystone

            Back in the day, the Supreme Court supported the legality of slavery. And somewhat later in the day, it supported racial segregation.

          • 1stworlder

            I guess you missed the story about the 3 Hispanics in OH that had girls chained up in their house for years, that punched them in the gut until they miscarried. Lamestream media edited out their Puerto Rican flag on pictures

            “Missing women Amanda Berry, 26, Gina DeJesus, 23, and Michele Knight, 32, were found on Monday after Amanda escaped and called 911

            Girl, 6, also found alive after Amanda gave birth to her inside the home

            Police sources claim one of the women had as many as three miscarriages because she was so malnourished”

          • American Patriot

            Actually, two of the men had nothing to do with their brother’s crimes at all. In fact, they actually denounced him for his crimes during TV interviews. It was just one man who was simply evil.

          • 1stworlder

            kept 3 girls locked up in his house for 3 years and they say they had nothing to do with it.

          • American Patriot

            Actually, one woman was kept for 11 years (2002-2013), another was kept for 10 years (2003-2013) and the third was kept for 9 years (2004-2013). The pervert’s brothers had nothing to do with the crime, which was why authorities released them after it became clear that their brother was the only one who committed the crimes. In fact, one of the brothers was actually upset to find one of the girls in his crazy brother’s house. This was after the crazy brother (the pervert) “volunteered” to find the third girl after she went missing and even attended her vigil. The pervert actually apologized to his brothers for getting them into the mess after they were all arrested. But as all evidence states, the pervert’s brothers had nothing to do with his crimes at all. In fact, the brothers actually denounced him during TV interviews. Their whole family was shocked at his actions.

          • Veracious_one

            NAACP does support abortions..

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7yP4dd26oM

          • 95Theses

            “There is no way you can escape the implications. When
            an organization has a history of racism, when its literature is openly racist, when it goals are self-consciously racial, and when its programs invariably revolve around race, it doesn’t take an expert to realize that the organization is indeed racist.” Really now, how can anyone believe anything about Planned Parenthood except that it is a hive of elitist bigotry, prejudice and bias? Just because the organization has a smattering of minority staffers in key positions does nothing to dispel the pain facts.
            — William L. Davis, a black financial analyst
            http://www.blackgenocide.org/archived_articles/negro05.html

            Grand Illusions: The Legacy of Planned Parenthood by George Grant, page 119
            http://www.amazon.com/Grand-Illusions-Legacy-Planned-Parenthood/dp/0943497086/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1399683638&sr=1-1&keywords=grand+illusions+george+grant

          • 95Theses

            And Julian Bond praises NACCP for their support for pro-abortion. Great link, Jack.

          • JackSpratt

            NO, they only support a woman’s right to choose an abortion. Face it, the NAALCP is a communist front group, just like Media Matters, Moveon.ugh, People for the American way, People for the Separation of Church and State, and a hundred others.

          • 1stworlder

            The only choice the leftists want people to be allowed to make is to totally agree with them.

    • Notalibfool

      “…Uncle Tom flunkies…”?!?!?!!!!!!!!?????????????

      Now you’re making racist comments against blacks? Steve where does your hatred end!

  • Gee

    Imagine if somebody on the left was told that they could not say what they want – the screams would be heard on the moon

  • ebonystone

    “After May 24th, Bomberger may never again publicly use the phrase ‘National Association for the Abortion of Colored People.”’

    o.k., How about “National Association for the Annihilation of Colored People”? Or, “National Association for the Abolition of Colored People”?

    • ahad_ha_amoratsim

      Or just change Abortion of to Aborting.

    • 95Theses

      Hmmmm. Is there any relationship to the NACCP (the National Association of Constantly Complaining People). !-D

      Um, Steve-o?

      • Steve Fair

        Oh geez. Who complains more than righties?

        • 95Theses

          Malcontent liberals and Democrats … ah, but there I go again, being redundant.

        • 1stworlder

          National Association of Complaining C()nts& Pu$$ies

  • D Brown

    Trademarks have to be protected. In this case the satire wasn’t obvious enough and could be interpreted as an attempt to defame or alter.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      The “National Association for the Abortion of Colored People” is not obvious?

    • CDM

      Parody has a long history of being legally protected, so you’re just making stuff up. The landmark case is Irving Berlin et al. v. EC Publications where Irving Berlin and others sued Mad Magazine over song parodies.

      The court said in that case, “While brief phrases of the original lyrics were occasionally injected into the parodies, this practice would seem necessary if the defendants’ efforts were to ‘recall or conjure up’ the originals; the humorous effect achieved when a familiar line is interposed in a totally incongruous setting, traditionally a tool of parodists, scarcely amounts to a ‘substantial’ taking, if that standard is not to be woodenly applied.”

    • 95Theses
    • objectivefactsmatter

      A political trademark?

  • Steve Fair

    I wonder how loud the righties would yelp if there was a billboard calling the GOP “The Rightwing White People’s Party”. They are such hypocrites.

    • Notalibfool

      Don’t throw stones if you live in a glass house, Steve. You whine about racism yet are obscenely guilty of it yourself.

      • Steve Fair

        For instance?

        • Notalibfool

          Forgetful, eh Steve? Just how do you define racism?

        • CDM

          “… their black Uncle Tom flunkies …” from your post above: What you’re calling black conservatives who refuse to toe the left wing line and think for themselves. What you’re calling them is race traitors, in effect. Sounds kind of racist to me.

          • Notalibfool

            Oh, Stevie Blunder has made many racist remarks; he’s just to ignorant to see it.

          • Steve Fair

            Are you implying that black conservatives are the only blacks who think for themselves? The 5% of black America? THAT is racist.

          • Notalibfool

            Steve, please stop! I can’t quit laughing!

          • Steve Fair

            Keep laughing fool. You sure won’t answer.

          • Notalibfool

            The only fool here is you, racist Steve. I have answered but the guy who keeps insulting everyone’s intelligence is not smart enough to see that.

          • 95Theses

            The only 5-percenter I can think of right now is Jay-Z. Ha
            ha!

          • CDM

            We’re talking about your racism, not what you think mine is or isn’t. The fact that you came up with a label for people who disagree with black establishment orthodoxy speaks volumes. I don’t go around calling white people I disagree with “race traitors”.

            In fact, the original “Uncle Tom” in Harriet Beecher Stowe’s novel was the opposite of what the term means today.

          • Steve Fair

            Answer the question and stop evading. Do you believe most blacks as incapable of independent thought? Yes or No?

          • CDM

            You’re the one who’s evading. I know what you’re doing. Trying to lay a trap so you can pop up and yell “Raaaacisssst!!” The question is, are you capable of independent thought and why you are so hostile to those who might think differently.

          • Steve Fair

            LMAO!!!!! Don’t worry I already know the answer. You righties make it clear with your every utterance. Black conservatives are the only intelligent, courageous blacks because they think like YOU and not like most blacks who are hooked on handouts and bound to the liberal plantation. But Nooooooooooooooo, that’s not racist. Unbelievable.

          • CDM

            Steve, believe me, I’m trying to help you here. I’m trying to pry you away from establishment orthodoxy and into looking at facts as they exist today, not fifty years ago and not 150 years ago. The past is done and nothing can change it. To hold onto the traumas of the past doesn’t help us as individuals to move into the future.

          • Steve Fair

            Okay. Let’s talk today then. Tell me honestly why you believe that 90% of blacks vote Democratic and the GOP is 90% white.

          • CDM

            OK, I’ve often wondered about why 90% of blacks vote democratic or why 70% of Jews vote the same way. Unfortunately, since I’m not black or Jewish, I can’t answer that. But you might be able to, at least from the black perspective. If Sammy Davis was around, he might be able to explain both.

            I can explain why I’m a conservative. I don’t presume to explain why others are. That’s the key point here, that we are all individuals, not some unit in a racial bloc that has to be in lockstep.

          • Steve Fair

            It’s very simple to me. Democrats and liberals are about inclusion, opening up doors and extending opportunity to as many Americans as possible. They realize that a society works best when most citizens are employed and functioning. Republicans and conservatives are about closing doors and limiting opportunity. Concentrating power and opportunity into as few hands as possible. Making it more difficult to advance. Rebelling against challenges to racism and discrimination. Most blacks and Jews realize that the same ideology that propels modern conservatism is that which led to the Holocaust and what countenanced segregation and racial oppression in the so called land of freedom.

          • American Patriot

            That is BS and you know it. Modern conservatives are the real classical liberals, not the so-called “liberals” that are really leftists. The New Left movement hijacked the term “liberal” to describe themselves when the movement took over the Democratic Party in the late 1960s and early 1970s. You are a useful idiot who repeats the left’s nonsense propaganda.

          • JackSpratt

            If you haven’t noticed Steve, Communism, in practice, does not do that! If you look at the record, republicans have the best record of advancing blacks. Which is not hard to understand since republicans led the fight against slavery and segregation.
            Modern conservatism, is the Classical Liberalism of the Founders, to wit: free enterpirse economy, limited government, property rights, religious freedom, firearms freedom, love of liberty. Modern liberalism/leftism enslaves blacks on their plantation in generational welfare. The democrap plantation has destroyed the black family.

          • Steve Fair

            Racist garbage. The majority of welfare recipients are white. Most black people are hard working, employed law abiding citizens. Are you suggesting that blacks were better off under Jim Crow?

          • Secret Person

            The majority? Maybe in raw numbers but whites are still the majority race. The much more telling statistic, which smart people would pay attention to, is the fact that, as a percentage of race, the majority on welfare are blacks and hispanics. Which shows just how dysfunctional their cultures are. When the US becomes a minority-majority country you can bet that a very substantial proportion of minorities will be on welfare but that they will also win in the raw number category. A very dubious achievement but when education and personal responsibility isn’t valued in a substantial proportion of the minority communities then that is the outcome.

          • Steve Fair

            Are you suggesting that a majority of blacks and hispanics don’t work and are on welfare?

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “Racist garbage.”

            CRT must guide all logic. Down with honkeys!

          • Drakken

            So your really a communist? How quaint and amusing, say, what color is the sky in your little world by the way? Funny that you have been so steeped in racial grievance and race theory that you cannot see the damage your doing for your cause, by making folks resent communist like you more and more everyday, until it comes out into the open, good luck with that.

          • Steve Fair

            I keep telling you that you don’t represent most “folks”. You are a far right, scared, resentful racist extremist. Most whites would laugh at you.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            ” You are a far right, scared, resentful racist extremist.”

            Anyone that defies the ultimate “proof” derived from Critical Race Theory must be a “far right” neo-Nawzi anti-social bloodsucking vampire honkey.

          • American Patriot

            Most blacks would laugh at you for being a far left, scared, resentful racist extremist. You don’t represent most blacks at all. In fact, I don’t think you even are black. You are simply a self-hating white leftist who poses as a black nationalist/racist supremacist.

          • Steve Fair

            Why don’t you think I’m black?

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “Most blacks and Jews realize that the same ideology that propels modern conservatism is that which led to the Holocaust and what countenanced segregation and racial oppression in the so called land of freedom.”

            The German National Socialists opposed communism. Anyone else that opposes communism must also be just like them. Especially if they’re honkeys.

          • Secret Person

            Not just Sammy Davis but Ed Brooke who was the first elected black senator. And he is a Republican. In your face Steve Fair.

          • Steve Fair

            Brooke was also a liberal who supported Barack Obama. Brooke would have no place in today’s Republican party. Chew on THAT racist.

          • American Patriot

            Black nationalist, Hubert Humphrey and Henry “Scoop” Jackson were classical liberals (modern conservatives) who would have no place in today’s Democratic Party (which is a primarily left-wing party). Take that, you black racist.

          • Steve Fair

            Humphrey attacked Thurmond and the segregationist wing of the Democratic party as early as 1948. Remember? When Thurmond launched a States Rights party campaign in opposition to Civil Rights legislation. Thurmond, who counselled Nixon on the GOP Southern Strategy. You don’t have a clue.

          • American Patriot

            Humphrey criticized Thurmond in the 1948 election when the latter was still a segregationist. Thurmond eventually renounced his racist past later on in his political career. May I remind you that as a US senator, Thurmond voted in favor of Clarence Thomas to be a Supreme Court Justice in a Senate vote that was the closest margin in Supreme Court nomination history. And by the way, it wasn’t Thurmond who created the term “Southern strategy”. It was Pat Buchanan. And no, Nixon did not rely on a fake “strategy” that didn’t really exist. You, on the other hand, ignore the true history of how the Democratic Party became much more left-wing than before. Humphrey was a classical liberal (which is modern conservatism), while George McGovern and Jimmy Carter are leftists. The New Left movement destroyed the classical liberalism that existed in the Democratic Party when that party was taken over by the radical left over four decades ago. Today, the GOP is the clasical liberal party, while the Democratic Party is the left-wing party that bears little or no resemblance to the Democratic Party of Humphrey and “Scoop” Jackson.

          • American Patriot

            That is because of the massive damage the New Left movement did in the 1960s when they decided to launch a massive smear attack against the Civil Rights movement, calling its activists and leadership “Uncle Toms” and “token liberals” for the US government. The New Left infiltrated the Civil Rights movement and took over that movement and reshaped its agenda, essentially getting rid of the goals of the original movement, which was inclusion into American society and embracing the American Dream. The New Left movement got rid of those goals, and instead focused on race-obsession and radical left-wing politics. But the New Left movement didn’t end with taking over the Civil Rights movement. The New Left decided to take over the Democratic Party and reshape the agenda of that party. Hence, classical liberalism in the Democratic Party was replaced by identity politics and other radical left-wing politics. That was how the contemporary Democratic Party achieved their monopoly over black American voters.

    • 95Theses

      If it hasn’t happened yet, how can you call them hypocrites?

      Typical Un-Fair tactic: create ridiculous hypothetical, then provide equally ridiculous answer to the hypothetical before it can be tested. Aristotle
      would be proud of you.
      Um, except that he’s one of those Dead White Guys. !-D

    • ahad_ha_amoratsim

      Absolutely right, Steve. Anyone – especially anyone black — who makes fun of the NAACP or any other liberal group should be silenced by law.

    • American Patriot

      I wonder how loud the leftists would yell if there was a billboard calling the Democratic Party “The Leftwing Party for the Race-Obsessed hatred of Whites and Conservative Minorities, and the Exploitation of Minorities and the Poor”. They are such hypocrites.

    • Secret Person

      The NAACP does support abortion, there is no question about that. You support pro-choice, you support abortion. No slandering there. However, calling the GOP a White People’s Party is wrong as it has hispanics, blacks, and asians as members. So that is slandering the party. It wouldn’t be hypocritical but someone of your low intellect wouldn’t understand.

  • CowboyUp

    “There’s no Freedom of Speech under liberalism. Only license for the left.” – That’s called privilege.

  • Veracious_one

    it sounds like the Clinton judge wants to censor free speech because he doesn’t like what he’s hearing…

    • JackSpratt

      Yep, the fascist left strikes again! Who would find it surprising that a Klinton judge would rule in favor of a communist front group.

  • Veracious_one

    Uptown Steve! is it really you?

    • Daniel Greenfield

      yes it’s him

  • JackSpratt

    More leftwing fascism. If the NAALCP supports Planned Parenthood, which they do, then the phrase is on the mark. Imagine, Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, was both a communist and a racist.

  • DB1954

    By a preponderance of the evidence, huh? good lawd. This country is in so much trouble …

  • Veracious_one

    The NAACP is just like Islam when it comes to dealing with criticism…critics must be silenced….

  • Steve Fair

    Bush Strategist Lee Atwater explains the GOP strategy for appealing to white racists. Enjoy! http://www.thenation.com/article/170841/exclusive-lee-atwaters-infamous-1981-interview-southern-strategy#

    • American Patriot

      More BS coming from a race-obsessed bigot like you and that neo-Communist paper The Nation! Why don’t you see how Jesse Jackson’s strategists explain the Democratic strategy for appealing to black racists, you stupid lowlife.

      • Steve Fair

        You’re very emotional, aren’t you? LOL!!!!!

        • American Patriot

          And you are a black supremacist (though I believe you are a self-hating white person) who has no problem with a bigot calling a certain place “Hymietown” in order to offend people of a certain religion. You support the extreme left and their anti-white, anti-Christian and anti-Jewish agenda, as well as smear conservative minorities with lies and propaganda, you racist lowlife.

          • Steve Fair

            Such logic given that most of the left is white, Christian or Jewish. Conservative minorities couldn’t fill a phone booth because they are bottom dwelling, self hating sellouts..

          • American Patriot

            White leftists are sell-outs to their country. Conservative minorities are patriots to their country. Tim Wise grins and performs for black racists and bigots.

  • handsomerandyblackladbrad1953

    Louis Farr_a**-CLOWN’S boys murdered Malcolm X AND LOT OF OTHER PEOPLE!!!!!!!TO H**L WITH THEM!!!!!!