Elizabeth Warren: The Rich White Man’s Candidate

Federal Reserve HearingThe political establishment with its clouds of consultants, advisers and fixers rarely bothers glancing out of its enclaves of wealth and privilege to take stock of America. Instead it taps at the virtual pages of the paper of record on the appropriate app, nods its head at having its prejudices confirmed and moves on.

And that is why the Elizabeth Warren political express remains convinced that a wealthy professor and government insider who occasionally says all the approved things about Wall Street that Obama used to say is the Democratic Party’s best hope for connecting with the youth, women and the working class.

Actual polling though shows that Warren has twice as much support among the $50,000 and over group than she does at the under $50,000 level. Warren is also least popular with 18-29 year olds. She’s so unpopular with them that even seniors, a traditionally conservative group, like her more than they do.

Class warfare is a game for those with money. The family that is just scraping by doesn’t have the time to worry about how many times their annual salaries a CEO makes. Envying billionaires is the occupation of millionaires. Envying them is the occupation of the upper end of the middle class.

Elizabeth Warren reminds most teens and twenty-somethings of a particularly boring professor who combines insincerity with obtuseness because that is exactly what she is. Those most concerned about her solutions for student loan debt are Educrats and financiers smelling another windfall bailout.

Not only does Warren fail with the blue collar voter and the young voter, but she even suffers from a gender gap. Warren is more popular with men than with women. And she’s also more popular with white than non-white voters.

Instead of being some kind of revolutionary, Elizabeth Warren’s main appeal is to rich white men.

Her 2012 victory didn’t prove that she was popular. Warren just happened to be the beneficiary of Obama’s turnout demographics. In exit polls, she won a decisive majority among voters who said that they were voting for whomever their party’s candidate happened to be, but lost badly among voters who said that they were looking for an “honest and trustworthy” candidate.

Warren lost moderates and independents. She just happened to be a blue candidate in a blue state.

The makeup of the electorate consisted of 60% Obama voters and 38% Romney voters. Warren won by far less than Obama did and held on to only 85% of the Obama votes. Not only doesn’t Warren hold the secret to appealing to disaffected voters, but she couldn’t even manage to hang on to all of the Obama votes in liberal Massachusetts. Compare that to only 3% of Romney voters who defected to Warren.

But political wishful thinking isn’t limited to the Democratic Party. The Republican Party has some serious thinking to do about its candidates.

The Chris Christie presidential express is just as delusional as the Elizabeth Warren campaign train to nowhere. Warren and Christie are party darlings whose local election wins in blue states were wrongly generalized into national potential because of the new ways of connecting to voters that they seemed to represent. No one bothered to ask which voters they were connecting to and how reliably.

Among Republicans, Christie picks up 17% percent of the votes of those making over $50,000 but only 5% among those making under $50,000. No other candidate has a gap this big. On the other side of the dial, Jeb Bush largely leads because of support from the under $50,000 demographic. Without them, he shows up only in fourth place. Ted Cruz does twice as well among the under than over $50,000 voters.

These numbers provide no easy answers, but they should lead to some serious thinking. While candidates like Marco Rubio and Rand Paul beat the drum for broadening the party through diversity, they perform far worse among the under $50,000 vote than the over $50,000 vote. It’s easy to dismiss such numbers, but they haunted Mitt Romney in the primaries when he lost blue collar voters to Santorum or Gingrich only to slide by on wealthier voters and they then hurt him in the general election.

Obama would not have gotten a second term if Republicans had been better at white working class voter turnout. The Elizabeth Warren threat may have proven to be as phony as her Native American heritage, but that doesn’t mean that the Democrats won’t be able to find a winning candidate.

The Republicans have spent the last two elections and the current election campaigning on Obama’s failures. By 2016 they will longer be able to run against Obama the way that the Democrats lost the ability to run against Bush. The Republican Party will face new challenges despite never having mastered the old challenges of the Obama years. The GOP still remains a party with an identity crisis.

The Democratic Party lied its way across its own identity crisis. Elizabeth Warren, a millionaire lawyer campaigning for the underclass, an overpaid professor promising to help students and a member of a white elite passing as a Native American, represents everything hypocritical and contradictory about it.

Elizabeth Warren is the Democratic Party; a party of rich white liberals pretending to be diverse activists for the working class. It’s a scam made possible by allies running a powerful embedded media operation.

The Republican Party can’t pull a Warren. It faces a trio of former Republicans in Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren who moved on to become compulsive liars. Confronting one set of opportunistic Blue State Democrats with another set of opportunistic Blue State Republicans is a formula for failure. There’s a reason that opportunists like Biden and Warren left the Republicans behind to become Democrats. The Democratic Party offers unlimited corruption with no accountability.

The Republican Party’s identity crisis is its advantage. It can still rethink its establishment and listen to ordinary Americans. It doesn’t have to believe the latest nonsense making the rounds in Washington.

The opportunity is there.

Hillary Clinton, like Elizabeth Warren, is on shaky terms with younger voters. Her attempts to connect with blue collar voters torpedoed her book tour. The only difference between Clinton and Warren is that Hillary has Bill as a campaign asset. Otherwise they’re practically the same phony person.

Americans aren’t looking for another representative of the establishment slumming with occasional slams at Wall Street before heading off to a Wall Street fundraiser. They want authenticity.

If Republicans put forward their own version of Elizabeth Warren, they will be betting that they can still run against Obama in 2016. It may be a bet that they and the rest of the country will lose.

*

Don’t miss Shillman Journalism Fellow Daniel Greenfield on The Glazov Gang discussing “ISIS Rising”:

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.  

Subscribe to Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, and LIKE it on Facebook.

  • Shadowwind

    Warren’s trouble with voters isn’t too surprising. In my state of Kansas, Gov. Brownback gets the most support from people my age (18-29), while his opponent gets the most support from elderly liberal “Republicans” who are still upset that the voters threw them out of office in 2012. Apparently young people don’t care much for tax-and-spend lawyers who frequent strip clubs (ie, his opponent).

  • truebearing

    Republican elites obsess over the perfect candidate while the Left works on the perfect lie. This leads to big problems for Republicans. Their candidate has to unify the Right — an increasingly difficult task — while the Left naturally unifies around the most effective lie(s), whether it is a war on women, class warfare, or racism.

    The Left can plug any one of their best liars into the equation to facilitate their perfect lie. The Republican candidate has to achieve the impossible…be perfect and appeal to everyone, yet offend no one. It can’t be done, but this is why the Republican leadership strains at finding a moderate that isn’t too offensive.

    Reagan wasn’t popular with the Republican elite. He didn’t fit their formula for perfection. They mocked him nearly as much as the Left did. He broke through their containment field, however, because of his empathic connection with voters, not because of any prescription for success from Blown Election Central back at Republican HQ. The anything-but-perfect, “warmongering” outsider ignored the Republican recipe for failure, and the Left gnawed on their spleens, as Reagan defied both parties.

    People recognized Reagan’s core truthfulness and desire to help the nation. It could work again, as long as the professional losers the Republicans call consultants are completely ignored by whoever carries the banner for the Right. Steve Schmidt and Nicole Wallace, this one’s for you.

    • Joe Schmoe

      “Republican elites obsess over the perfect candidate while the Left works on the perfect lie.’
      Where did you come up with that mindless lie? I guess in your inverted mental midget world, Palin was the best

    • joe kulak

      Agree completely; good analysis.

    • Dan Knight

      truebearing … brilliant analysis as usual. A great Nutshell for the word RINO, and a defense of Reagan.

    • West_Coast

      Bravo, truebearing.

      Here’s my 2016 Presidential ticket.

      Ted Cruz would do well to unite the base early. All the broken fractions of the Republican party could begin to unite under a Cruz/West ticket, with Rand Paul as the Secretary of the Treasury; he can do what he damn well wants to the Federal Reserve and the IRS (Ron Paul could be his personal assistant); Trey Gowdy as Attorney General, restore the rule of law; John Bolton as Secretary of State, he could build our foreign alliances back up and tell our enemies where to get off; Sara Palin as the Secretary of Energy, “Drill Baby Drill!”. Scott Walker as Secretary of Labor, gut the unions, Right to Work in every state; Herman Cain Secretary of Commerce, deregulate everything; Ben Carson Secretary of Health and Human Service, end the welfare faction of the USA; David Barton Secretary of Education, get rid of Common Core.

      Secretary to the U.N. NO ONE

      • carpe diem 36

        not only no one but also no funds!!

  • DaCoachK

    America is dead. Voting is an exercise in futility. The electorate sees nothing wrong with communism, and fully one-half of the voters is mooching off the government. Does anyone expect these deadbeats to vote for someone who is going to cut off their livelihood? It was a great run. I enjoyed growing up in the USA. It is over. Protect yourself and your family. Do the best you can.

    • Patrick

      People who don’t vote are ignorant and lazy.

      • DaCoachK

        I cast my first vote for Ronald Reagan and have voted every election since. I am frustrated now because I don’t see any point to voting when the outcome matters little. There is no difference between Left-Wing-Loons and RINOs.You may enjoy voting for people like Romney and McCain, but I don’t. And won’t vote for another one like those two.

        • Joe Schmoe

          Trouble is, there just isn’t enough stupid reactionary cretins, even in this dumbed down country, to elect the sort of throwback you are crying for

        • ConcernedforAmerica

          I agree with you DaCoach. Folks think that voting is the only thing that matters. It doesn’t, what matters is holding these elected officials to their words. All these folks typing away on different websites will not type to their elected officials. How are they helping. I appreciate that we need to help educate each other, however, the reason the Progressives are winning in the destruction of this great country is because they are loud and they are persistent. The republicans are silent. I will not vote for one more RINO. If they run a RINO, it will be the first time in my life that I don’t vote!

          • Patrick

            Lazy and ignorant..

          • truebearing

            Voting isn’t the only thing that matters, but it is an essential aspect of representative governance. Consider the alternatives before you give up. Then consider the consequences of giving up.

            What would you say if the police in your area gave up because criminals keep coming and they can’t get them all? Pretty soon, criminals would be at your doorstep and you’d be fighting for your life, or at least your possessions, or perhaps your children. What if your doctor quit because people keep getting sick?

            Not voting for a RINO is what got Obama elected. Now we have Ebola in America and ISIS running rampant…almost as rampant as our debt and deficit. We have an Attorney General who is a criminal racist that hates white people. The IRS is persecuting conservatives, and the list goes on. No RINO would do the things Obama has done, so stop making false equivalencies as a pretense for being a quitter. Have some backbone and fight back, even if it means having to settle for less than what you want.

            You are complaining that the Left is loud and persistent, but Republicans are silent. What about you? You’re ready to quit. You’re ready to concede defeat and let the Left win. If you don’t think there is enough leadership, then step forward and provide some. Retreat is not an option.

          • http://sunderedsheres.com Renaissance Nerd

            Amen! I have yet to vote for a presidential candidate I could whole-heartedly support (outside of primaries) and that’s just the way it is. I don’t even agree 100% on politics with my brothers–or anyone at all, that I know of. Reagan’s 11th commandment was: Thou shalt not speak ill of another Republican. Anyone who uses the word ‘RINO’ from now one I will instantly ignore, because all it does is give aid and comfort to the petite-fascists who use the word ‘Democrat’ as camouflage. Our nation would be far better off if McCain had been president, and also Romney, and also Dole, and also Bush Sr. They lost because some people make the perfect the enemy of the good enough. Vote for pie-in-the-sky if you will, but meanwhile disastrous reality will continue to unfold back her in the actual world.

            I’ll take slow-walk socialism over bullet-train socialism any day. Slowing it down is in and of itself a worthy goal, even if it isn’t reversed, because the longer it takes the longer we have to turn it around one area at a time. When we give up, only then is America dead. Cowards and shirkers abound, and should simply be ignored.

          • carpe diem 36

            your name is very apt.

        • truebearing

          Who isn’t frustrated? Take that frustration and channel it into relentless opposition to the Left. At very least, make the commitment to go down swinging. Surrendering isn’t all it’s cracked up to be.

        • cree

          There was no difference between Obama and Romney? Until another in the Reagan vein happens, any vote to the right of the progressive, socialist left is still smarter than a non vote. 2012 proves the point.

        • carpe diem 36

          so that means that your vote will go to the democrat.

      • 1Indioviejo1

        Most voters don’t know Shiite from Shinola. Why do you want the L.O.V. to vote? DaCoachK has it right.

        • Patrick

          Lazy and ignorant.

      • Gregoryno6

        What’s that line about ‘Democracy is a choice between the unpalatable and the disastrous’?
        Not voting is a free kick to the people you least want in government.

        • Patrick

          Lazy, ignorant, and pretentious.

    • Daniel_Greenfield

      Voting isn’t all that effective, but it’s not futile either.

      Ceding any territory to the left and their allies is defeatist.

    • truebearing

      America is alive as long as there are a significant number of Americans with the courage and will to fight for this country. The Revolutionary War wasn’t won by the majority — not even close. This country isn’t being overthrown by a majority. The Left is a definite minority.

      To say “America is dead” is to surrender without a fight. Doesn’t your liberty and the liberty of your family, friends, and fellow Americans deserve more than quitting when the going gets tough?

    • cree

      If 2010 gave you some hope, then hang on. I’ve been where you are; I was rebuked and then I got pissed, at liberty’s enemies.

  • I_Am_Me

    Only an anti-fascist right wing candidate has a chance. And by anti-fascist, I mean anti-fascist. All this crony capitalism, Chamber of Commerce, Federal Reserve, Big Government garbage needs to be rightfully identified as the destroyer of American freedom and greatness. And this creeping Statism and Purple Penguin abandonment of reason and intelligence is more ammo for the right candidate.

    We need a miracle dark horse candidate or it’s finished. Japan is hanging onto a deficit of 200%+ of GDP so maybe we can pack on another $17 trillion before it gets made official than the American Century and Freedom is OVER.

    • Joe Schmoe

      If you are antifascist, what are doing here?

      • joe kulak

        What are you doing here, Troll?

        • Joe Schmoe

          Trying to knock some sense and honesty through your thick skull

          • nomoretraitors

            No, you’re trying to justify your paycheck from George Soros

      • Gislef

        Are you pro-fascist, or anti-fascist?

      • joe kulak

        You can’t get much more fascist than the Ebama Administration. Government has become as cozy with big money as has ever been the case.

        • Joe Schmoe

          that is utter nonsense. People have gotten filthy rich and famous ranting the same sort of nonsense about Obama in the last 6 yars

          • I_Am_Me

            This is why you are a troll. A leftist troll I’m sure. A lie factory.

          • Joe Schmoe

            So says a deluded fanatic

          • I_Am_Me

            That’s racist!

          • Joe Schmoe

            LOL a RW idjit is playing the race card! Talk about irony, that pegged my magnetometer

          • I_Am_Me

            Bigot!

          • Joe Schmoe

            Wow, you are running out of your stock mindless accusations to throw at people who challenge your limited thought process

          • I_Am_Me

            Must feel very familiar to you, homophobe.

          • bigjulie

            What’s an “idjit” , Joe…is it something like a “widjit”? People are starting to laugh, Joe. You must have graduated last from your Syrian Troll School!

          • Debbie G

            Wow, you’re dumber than we thought.

          • bigjulie

            I have seen your Troll School records, Joe…”deluded fanaticism” is the only class you scored an “A” in. Better give it up, Joe…people are laughing!

          • truebearing

            Getting rich has nothing to do with being a fascist, moron.

      • truebearing

        Obviously you don’t know the definition of fascism. Why am I not surprised?

        BTW, if that is your photo, you are insane and probably have liver disease. If it isn’t your photo, you are still insane for choosing it to represent you.

  • mtnhikerdude

    When Prop 187 was passed by a 60 % margin and then taken to a 9th Circuit court judge in San Francisco and declared unconstitutional , I realized if elections did not go the way the Left wanted they could just negate them . This reeks of Natzism , Stalinism and Maoism . The Left will get their way no matter what . DaCoach said it America is dead thanks to President Ebola and his ilk. The Republican party has been castrated, Love of Country is being morphed into a crime.

    • I_Am_Me

      When do you think they’ll come for the guns?

      • Joe Schmoe

        Time to climb out of your bunker

        • I_Am_Me

          Come get me.

          • Joe Schmoe

            Why? Why do I need another useless idiot in my life?

          • I_Am_Me

            You’re just another chickensh*t lefty. Hiding behind a keyboard and a pen.

          • truebearing

            That’s right. You are all you need.

      • mtnhikerdude

        After the mid terms definitely before 11- 2016 . They are praying for another Columbine or some recognizable politician or celebrity to get shot . They are bold enough to stage it in order to have an excuse to come for our weapons .

      • Guest

        If “they” wanted your guns “they” would already be holding them.

    • Joe Schmoe

      Sure, only a mindless RW grunter thinks treating gays the same as anyone else is Stalinism, This website has degenerated into a cesspool of fascist creeps pretending to be for freedom, or free-dumb

      • I_Am_Me

        Go play with the Purple Penguins.

        • Joe Schmoe

          After the way you abused them, they won’t go near anyone else

          • cree

            That sounds just like a useless idiot comment.

      • bigjulie

        Joe Schmoe…long on Pejoratives, zero common sense! We’re on to you, Joe…give it up!

      • nomoretraitors

        The biggest fascists — the left.
        Time to change your name to Joe Schmuck.

      • Debbie G

        Fascism is leftist.

    • bigjulie

      I disagree! I am about as Conservative as you can get, and I agree with the 9th Circuit. (THAT does not happen very often!!) Prop 187 sought to “define” marriage as the union of one man and one woman, by LAW! Law further provides legal “privileges” for people who are legally “married” that are not available to others not legally married. The law, as written, denied these “privileges” to a whole group of humans, namely Gay people. Thus, by the State getting involved in something that had a lot of properties with a definite “religious” taint, Prop 187 did not offer “equal protection under the law” and was, further, attempting to legally foist a religious concept by force of law, onto the general population, many of whom disagreed with the concept, not the least reason of which was a denial of certain privileges of contract law (marriage is a civil “contract”) to Gay people.
      IMHO, the argument boils down to who can use the word “marriage” for their “union” and who cannot! With the advent of “Civil Union”, the State attempted to equalize the marriage “privileges” granted under Contract law to everybody, but just not call the legal union of Gay people “marriage”. Unfortunately, there were still some “privileges” reserved to married people that were denied to civil union people. IMHO The only interest the State should have at all in “marriage” is enforcing the civil contract aspects of it, equally, to all persons.

  • Libslayer

    Clinton, Warren, and Christie are all dissembling, grasping, opportunistic, nebulous gasbags, for whom lying and corruption comes easily and naturally.
    Like Obama, they are amoral nothing burgers with a totalitarian impulse.
    Christie is for all intents and purposes, a democrat in a republican fat suit.
    I think one problem for the dems (and Christie) is “con man fatigue”.
    Is there a single democrat or liberal republican who ISN’T a compulsive liar?
    The Clintons were and are notorious liars; on that point, Obama is in a class all by himself. Warren is a fake Indian. Hillary is a fake poor woman. Obama is a fake competent president. And Christie is a fake republican.

    People want someone real. Does that person exist?
    I like Ted Cruz; I think he is real. And he has my vote.
    Can we trust republicans to not pick a liberal weenie for 2016?
    I don’t have much faith.

    • bigjulie

      I agree 100% about Ted Cruz! He seems about as honest and genuine in his convictions as can be found! He is articulate and quick on his feet in debates about the things most real Americans really care about. He would mop the floor in a debate with ANYONE the Pwogs can throw against the wall!
      The entire farce of candidate selection has become a kind of slapstick comedy, with “experts” like Karl Rove huffing and puffing behind an Oz curtain, twisting dials and stomping on foot pedals to create all manner of noisy, distractive nonsense designed to get themselves hired as the “advisor who can deliver the Independents”! All Ted Cruz has to do, like Reagan, is continue to “be himself” regardless of the extraneous crap the other “advisors” throw at him.
      Ted Cruz is, by far, the most dangerous of Conservative candidates as can be seen by the garbage already being thrown about him by thoroughly frightened rivals in both parties. He is by far the most honest, and, best of all, HE LOVES AMERICA AND IS THE ONLY CANDIDATE WHO REALLY UNDERSTANDS THE ORIGINAL PREMISES ON WHICH SHE WAS FOUNDED!

      • Debbie G

        Unfortunately, I doubt Cruz will be chosen. He doesn’t tow the GOP line.

        • bigjulie

          Hi Deb…forgive me, but the proper verb is spelt “toe”, not “tow”. Thanks for your interest and comment.

          • Debbie G

            I’ve wondered about that, although neither spelling makes much sense to me! I also hear a lot of people saying “Cut the mustard,” when I believe it should be “Cut the muster.” Thanks. (My mother’s name is Julie.)

    • Tom G.

      Best comment I’ve read in many moons. Questions: Why do “the people” keep getting served up and accepting such fare? Are we the object of Jack Nicholson’s scorn at the end of “A Few Good Men?” (You can’t HANDLE the truth.”)

  • Joe Schmoe

    If she is the rich white man’s candidate, why is FPM mag upset when they serve the same people?

    • bigjulie

      The Syrian Troll School you graduated from has had its funding pulled after the donors started reading what you write! Where does the Left find Cranks like you? You should enter a Convent and find a life!

      • nomoretraitors

        No, he should enter a psychiatric institution and get electroshock therapy

        • bigjulie

          Whatever…it appears that FPM management has already taken care of him!

  • joe kulak

    The Dim-o-rats lie about their intentions; the RePubes lie about who they are.

  • PAthena

    Senator Elizabeth Warren claimed to have American Indian ancestry to get into Harvard Law School on the unconstitutional basis of being from a preferred group, a liar from the beginning.
    (The self-appointed language police insist that American Indians cannot be called “Indians” because Columbus did not discover India when he discovered America. The self-appointed language police misuse language when they insist on calling American Indians “Native Americans” since anyone born in the United States is a native American. (I am a native American, born in Brooklyn, N.Y.) Note that American Indians are not to be found in India, unless they are visiting.)

    • nomoretraitors

      The name America is also of European origin, named for an Italian explorer

      • aspacia

        Amerigo V, was a cartographer.

    • Patrick

      Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-z-z-z-z-z-z…….

  • http://mysteresmoonbatslayerclub.blogspot.com/ mystere

    Even the liberals are distancing themselves from Lizzy Warren. Only the rich white LIBERAL men seem to back her, based on what this seems to be pointing to.

  • Joe Schmoe

    I love how in the FPM miniverse, anyone who doesn’t lick the boots of the rich is involved in class warfare, And no RW trailer dwelling failure is ever envious or greedy, because they have their guns and Jeebus to make them feel special and powerful

    • ConcernedforAmerica

      You’re part of the problem Mr. Schmoe. You’ve bottled yourself up into one party, and one party only. Can you please tell us all how your party, the PROGRESSIVE, Communist party is doing anything to help the regular working folks? America was a founded on God, Guns and the Constitution. Have you read that lately? I’ll wait for your answer.

    • nomoretraitors

      Go crawl back inside your occupy tent, Schmuck. You’re not ready for the real world

  • Bellerophons_Revenge

    The under $50K people vote their race and their ethnicity. Christie won in New Jersey because Italians voted for him and so did the rich white crony capitalists. He’s a terrible governor who talks tough to unions but hasn’t done a thing about the public employee pension monster that promises to eat New Jersey.

    Putting forward Rick Santorum as the “working man’s candidate” is lunacy. Santorum stated that the problem with America is that “too many people are pursuing their own happiness” which gives you a pretty good idea of what he thinks of the Declaration of Independence. He’s the worst of the big government Republicans who thinks “If only we could bring back the 1950′s when Americans knew their place”.

    Warren polls badly against other Democrats looking for the “blue collar” vote but as a presidential candidate she’ll be running against someone with an “R” after their name. She squashed liberal Scott Brown (who left the state and tried to run in New Hampshire where again he’s getting his butt kicked). The under $50K will vote for her because all they’ll see in her opponent is a rich white guy who “didn’t build that” even if the Republicans run Ben Carson.

    Right now, the Republicans are coasting on Obama’s incompetence and malice. However, as a party they have no coherent national message.

    FreedomWorks posts the votes of Senators and Congressmen on issues affecting liberty and free markets and rates them from 0 to 100.

    The average Democrat Senator had a score of 1.7. The average Republican Senator was 72.3. The Democrats were extremely consistent, the Republicans weren’t.

    In Congress where the Republicans had more power their votes averaged 67.4 and the Democrats averaged 15.7. Congressmen have smaller, more uniform districts than Senators and therefore must cater to more vocal minorities. This accounts for the less extreme Democrats but also note that the Republicans too, pander to special interests as their voting pattern comes closer to 50%.

    In both cases, the Democrats were consistent while the Republicans tended to be closer to the middle.

    If this continues we’ll see President Warren with large majorities in both houses.

  • ConcernedforAmerica

    When was the last time you called or wrote to your elected official? I bet never!

  • carpe diem 36

    I would love to see the following as the republican candidates for Potus and VP ‘ PAUL RYAN AND SCOT WALKER or vice versa. this fauxcahontas is as ignorant as Obama,a liar just like, if not more, than Obama and the only difference between them is their complexion tone.

    • Bellerophons_Revenge

      I could never go with Paul Ryan after he surrendered the sequester to the notorious half-wit Patty Murray. If he was beaten by her then he’s either a hopeless moron or a phony budget hawk. The sequester was the only thing restraining spending and Ryan gave it away.

      Scott Walker might be OK. He’s willing to fight budget battles in a blue state and he’s made things better in Wisconsin.

  • 1Indioviejo1

    This is why Ted Cruz has to be our candidate in 2016. He is head and shoulders above any other possible candidate.

  • Dan Knight

    Thank you Daniel for bringing perspective to Warren: She’s a quota-quack, and a fake one at that. To be fair: She does represent the Demokkkrat party. I would dare say if I were putting together a campaign to ‘hate whitey’ and stop ‘whitey’ privilege: She would be my Poster Boy … the Left just can’t see that it’s a parody of itself.

  • nomoretraitors

    Fake Indian

  • herb benty

    Ted Cruz for President, if you are serious about cleaning up the Democrat mess.

  • mathewsjw

    Elizabeth “Redskin” Warren, on the warpath 4 Democrats since Harvard admission

  • scottish Girl

    puke…..

  • Captlee

    I hear Tom Toms every time I hear or read her name. Amazing and sad that I even know her name.