<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ex-Director of Top Global Warming Center Compares Warmunism to McCarthyism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 14:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Snyder</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism/comment-page-1/#comment-5415946</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ralph Snyder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2014 01:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=225550#comment-5415946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bengtsson disagrees with you:

&quot;I do not believe there is any systematic “cover up” of scientific evidence on climate change or that academics’ work is being &#039;deliberately suppressed&#039;, as The Times front page suggests.&quot;

 See: http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/expert-reaction-to-claims-climate-research-was-suppressed/

&quot;... models of climate are way off, somewhere in the range of 2 or 3 hundred percent&quot; doesn&#039;t make any sense.  Would you care to explain what you mean and perhaps provide some evidence?  There is always room for improvement in the models, but they have performed quite well enough to show that as a matter of policy, we should be quite concerned.  It had nothing whatever to do with questioning the models.



In any case, evidence of global warming is not based on models.  It is based on data collected by satellites and in situ.

The basic point of Bengtsson&#039;s paper is that climate sensitivity may be at the low end of the accepted range and that more study is needed.   It was not rejected because it contradicted the &quot;party line.&quot;  It was rejected because it offered nothing new.  Hardly an example of suppression.


There is no suppression on the part of the science.  The suppression comes from the denialists, who dismiss evidence because it contradicts what they already &quot;know&quot; to be true, who file frivolous lawsuits against legitimate scientists, who send e-mail death threats to researchers whose findings they dislike, who use Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt to delay useful policy responses to the clear and present danger of climate change.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bengtsson disagrees with you:</p>
<p>&#8220;I do not believe there is any systematic “cover up” of scientific evidence on climate change or that academics’ work is being &#8216;deliberately suppressed&#8217;, as The Times front page suggests.&#8221;</p>
<p> See: <a href="http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/expert-reaction-to-claims-climate-research-was-suppressed/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/expert-reaction-to-claims-climate-research-was-suppressed/</a></p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; models of climate are way off, somewhere in the range of 2 or 3 hundred percent&#8221; doesn&#8217;t make any sense.  Would you care to explain what you mean and perhaps provide some evidence?  There is always room for improvement in the models, but they have performed quite well enough to show that as a matter of policy, we should be quite concerned.  It had nothing whatever to do with questioning the models.</p>
<p>In any case, evidence of global warming is not based on models.  It is based on data collected by satellites and in situ.</p>
<p>The basic point of Bengtsson&#8217;s paper is that climate sensitivity may be at the low end of the accepted range and that more study is needed.   It was not rejected because it contradicted the &#8220;party line.&#8221;  It was rejected because it offered nothing new.  Hardly an example of suppression.</p>
<p>There is no suppression on the part of the science.  The suppression comes from the denialists, who dismiss evidence because it contradicts what they already &#8220;know&#8221; to be true, who file frivolous lawsuits against legitimate scientists, who send e-mail death threats to researchers whose findings they dislike, who use Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt to delay useful policy responses to the clear and present danger of climate change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glpage</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism/comment-page-1/#comment-5415562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[glpage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2014 00:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=225550#comment-5415562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually the climate change folks are those without evidence.  Their models of climate are way off, somewhere in the range of 2 or 3 hundred percent; that is significantly wrong.  They have been caught fudging data, they have conspired to keep anyone whose research contradict theirs publish.  The fact that they are harassing someone who has just asked them to explain why their models are so far off is indicative of people who know their research is on shaky ground.  True scientists do not attempt to suppress those whose research may disagree with theirs.  Those who cannot tolerate a challenge to their &quot;research&quot; are ideologues, much like the Catholic church of days past.  Without the challenges science will not advance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the climate change folks are those without evidence.  Their models of climate are way off, somewhere in the range of 2 or 3 hundred percent; that is significantly wrong.  They have been caught fudging data, they have conspired to keep anyone whose research contradict theirs publish.  The fact that they are harassing someone who has just asked them to explain why their models are so far off is indicative of people who know their research is on shaky ground.  True scientists do not attempt to suppress those whose research may disagree with theirs.  Those who cannot tolerate a challenge to their &#8220;research&#8221; are ideologues, much like the Catholic church of days past.  Without the challenges science will not advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catherineinpvb</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism/comment-page-1/#comment-5415508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[catherineinpvb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 22:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=225550#comment-5415508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have been reading &#039;too hard&#039;. . .try &#039;warmunism&#039;. . .looks like; feels. ..sounds like; the &#039;real thing&#039;. Think it a great &#039;play on the truth&#039; of the matter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have been reading &#8216;too hard&#8217;. . .try &#8216;warmunism&#8217;. . .looks like; feels. ..sounds like; the &#8216;real thing&#8217;. Think it a great &#8216;play on the truth&#8217; of the matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism/comment-page-1/#comment-5415404</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Greenfield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=225550#comment-5415404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be more useful to go back to a time when Democrats were on board with the Anti-Comm consensus and why that took place.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be more useful to go back to a time when Democrats were on board with the Anti-Comm consensus and why that took place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catherineinpvb</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism/comment-page-1/#comment-5415280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[catherineinpvb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=225550#comment-5415280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are right. . .and &#039;indeed&#039; per the history.  A history that cannot be changed; or rather, could be; at least; if Repubs would stick to the facts that McCarthy was &#039;right&#039;; no matter, how badly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right. . .and &#8216;indeed&#8217; per the history.  A history that cannot be changed; or rather, could be; at least; if Repubs would stick to the facts that McCarthy was &#8216;right&#8217;; no matter, how badly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism/comment-page-1/#comment-5415216</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Greenfield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 14:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=225550#comment-5415216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The left looks for weaknesses and mistakes, just like it does today when someone in the GOP says something that plays into their hands. That  was McCarthy in a nutshell.

McCarthy hijacked the work of the real Anti-Communist crusaders and gave the left an opening to destroy it.

McCarthy wasn&#039;t the messenger. The messengers were people like Whittaker Chambers and  Victor Kravchenko  who really put something on the line.

&#039;&#039;For the Right to tie itself in any way to Senator McCarthy is suicide,&#039;&#039; Chambers said. &#039;&#039;He is a raven of disaster.&#039;&#039;

The rest was history.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The left looks for weaknesses and mistakes, just like it does today when someone in the GOP says something that plays into their hands. That  was McCarthy in a nutshell.</p>
<p>McCarthy hijacked the work of the real Anti-Communist crusaders and gave the left an opening to destroy it.</p>
<p>McCarthy wasn&#8217;t the messenger. The messengers were people like Whittaker Chambers and  Victor Kravchenko  who really put something on the line.</p>
<p>&#8221;For the Right to tie itself in any way to Senator McCarthy is suicide,&#8221; Chambers said. &#8221;He is a raven of disaster.&#8221;</p>
<p>The rest was history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism/comment-page-1/#comment-5415214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Greenfield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=225550#comment-5415214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The left looks for weaknesses and mistakes, just like it does today when some idiot starts talking about how rape isn&#039;t really rape. That was McCarthy in a nutshell.

He was an idiot and a Nazi sympathizer who hijacked the work of the real Anti-Communist crusaders and gave the left an opening to destroy it.

McCarthy wasn&#039;t the messenger. The messengers were people like Whittaker Chambers and  Victor Kravchenko who really put something on the line.

&#039;&#039;For the Right to tie itself in any way to Senator McCarthy is suicide,&#039;&#039; Chambers said. &#039;&#039;He is a raven of disaster.&#039;&#039; 

The rest was history.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The left looks for weaknesses and mistakes, just like it does today when some idiot starts talking about how rape isn&#8217;t really rape. That was McCarthy in a nutshell.</p>
<p>He was an idiot and a Nazi sympathizer who hijacked the work of the real Anti-Communist crusaders and gave the left an opening to destroy it.</p>
<p>McCarthy wasn&#8217;t the messenger. The messengers were people like Whittaker Chambers and  Victor Kravchenko who really put something on the line.</p>
<p>&#8221;For the Right to tie itself in any way to Senator McCarthy is suicide,&#8221; Chambers said. &#8221;He is a raven of disaster.&#8221; </p>
<p>The rest was history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catherineinpvb</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism/comment-page-1/#comment-5415195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[catherineinpvb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=225550#comment-5415195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And in your world- &#039;saying it&#039; - makes it so. . .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And in your world- &#8216;saying it&#8217; &#8211; makes it so. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Icarus62</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism/comment-page-1/#comment-5415183</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Icarus62]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 13:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=225550#comment-5415183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You really don&#039;t have a clue what you&#039;re talking about.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really don&#8217;t have a clue what you&#8217;re talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catherineinpvb</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism/comment-page-1/#comment-5415180</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[catherineinpvb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 13:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=225550#comment-5415180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Left killed the messenger, nonetheless.  As they always do; when their truth is threatened. McCarthy was not &#039;all&#039; self-promotion and he was right.  And you are right.   Perhaps the beginning of &#039;anti-communism&#039; as politically-incorrect.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Left killed the messenger, nonetheless.  As they always do; when their truth is threatened. McCarthy was not &#8216;all&#8217; self-promotion and he was right.  And you are right.   Perhaps the beginning of &#8216;anti-communism&#8217; as politically-incorrect.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catherineinpvb</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism/comment-page-1/#comment-5415176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[catherineinpvb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=225550#comment-5415176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And the info that speaks to the myths; the lies; the &#039;Agenda&#039; of Global Warming, keeps on coming - fast, furious, unafraid - and all but ignored by what are the &#039;real&#039; deniers of &lt;I&gt;Truth&lt;/I&gt;.  Here is another, posted on &lt;I&gt;Drudge Report&lt;/I&gt; this morning. Another &lt;I&gt;truth flag&lt;/I&gt;. . .

&lt;B&gt;http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/science/article4091344.ece &lt;/B&gt;

It IS amazing to behold; this commitment to a &#039;false narrative&#039; that serves a literal &#039;power base&#039;, given the fraud, thus far exposed. (The Left, clearly, understands far better - and has more experience - with the &#039;Power of the Lie&#039;; than do those more &lt;I&gt;Conservative&lt;/I&gt;. )

The lies, exposed in the e-mails (per GW &#039;Science&#039; Community) a few years back, would have been enough to embarrass into silence, those pushing what is a &#039;discredited&#039; agenda; had they been anything, that is, but committed Leftist ideologues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the info that speaks to the myths; the lies; the &#8216;Agenda&#8217; of Global Warming, keeps on coming &#8211; fast, furious, unafraid &#8211; and all but ignored by what are the &#8216;real&#8217; deniers of <i>Truth</i>.  Here is another, posted on <i>Drudge Report</i> this morning. Another <i>truth flag</i>. . .</p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/science/article4091344.ece" rel="nofollow">http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/science/article4091344.ece</a> </b></p>
<p>It IS amazing to behold; this commitment to a &#8216;false narrative&#8217; that serves a literal &#8216;power base&#8217;, given the fraud, thus far exposed. (The Left, clearly, understands far better &#8211; and has more experience &#8211; with the &#8216;Power of the Lie&#8217;; than do those more <i>Conservative</i>. )</p>
<p>The lies, exposed in the e-mails (per GW &#8216;Science&#8217; Community) a few years back, would have been enough to embarrass into silence, those pushing what is a &#8216;discredited&#8217; agenda; had they been anything, that is, but committed Leftist ideologues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catherineinpvb</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism/comment-page-1/#comment-5415149</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[catherineinpvb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 12:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=225550#comment-5415149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cultural Marxism is a beautiful thing, no?  As is the singularly, totalitarian (and always narcissistic) mind; whereby all the world; is experienced as a &#039;selfie&#039;. . .All to say. . .billyd1953, your &#039;me-in-the-mirror&#039;, &lt;I&gt;denialist&lt;/I&gt;. . . mental illness. . . critique; is no more than just that.  Albeit; no question, that if you realized it; you would not hold to same &lt;I&gt;prescriptions&lt;/I&gt; for dealing with it. 

(Which brings us back to the &#039;thing in itself&#039;; that you suffer from.)  And too, the threat that you people pose to the rest of us earth dwellers, because of it.   We, who realize that &lt;I&gt;Everything Changes&lt;/I&gt;; except the failings of human nature, that you and our &lt;I&gt;History-as-Horror&lt;/I&gt; books, give witness to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cultural Marxism is a beautiful thing, no?  As is the singularly, totalitarian (and always narcissistic) mind; whereby all the world; is experienced as a &#8216;selfie&#8217;. . .All to say. . .billyd1953, your &#8216;me-in-the-mirror&#8217;, <i>denialist</i>. . . mental illness. . . critique; is no more than just that.  Albeit; no question, that if you realized it; you would not hold to same <i>prescriptions</i> for dealing with it. </p>
<p>(Which brings us back to the &#8216;thing in itself&#8217;; that you suffer from.)  And too, the threat that you people pose to the rest of us earth dwellers, because of it.   We, who realize that <i>Everything Changes</i>; except the failings of human nature, that you and our <i>History-as-Horror</i> books, give witness to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edlancey</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism/comment-page-1/#comment-5415127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[edlancey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=225550#comment-5415127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[billyd1953

15 years old in 1968 - a terribly impressionable age to be spoonfed Hippy BS.

Then 40 years of smoking weed and still expecting to be taken seriously.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>billyd1953</p>
<p>15 years old in 1968 &#8211; a terribly impressionable age to be spoonfed Hippy BS.</p>
<p>Then 40 years of smoking weed and still expecting to be taken seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edlancey</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism/comment-page-1/#comment-5415123</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[edlancey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 11:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=225550#comment-5415123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nonsense. 

AGW is Lysenkoism for the 1968 and MTV generations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nonsense. </p>
<p>AGW is Lysenkoism for the 1968 and MTV generations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Icarus62</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism/comment-page-1/#comment-5415075</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Icarus62]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 07:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=225550#comment-5415075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your Gish Gallop of myths, lies and diversions can&#039;t hide the fact that you don&#039;t have a single scrap of valid evidence to contradict the accepted science of AGW.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your Gish Gallop of myths, lies and diversions can&#8217;t hide the fact that you don&#8217;t have a single scrap of valid evidence to contradict the accepted science of AGW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Icarus62</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism/comment-page-1/#comment-5415074</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Icarus62]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 07:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=225550#comment-5415074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well said.  He was incredibly naive and was rightly castigated for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said.  He was incredibly naive and was rightly castigated for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism/comment-page-1/#comment-5414994</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Greenfield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 03:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=225550#comment-5414994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s money in them thar Carbon

http://blogs.wsj.com/environmentalcapital/2008/10/27/street-cred-goldman-sachs-buys-into-carbon-credit-developer/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s money in them thar Carbon</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/environmentalcapital/2008/10/27/street-cred-goldman-sachs-buys-into-carbon-credit-developer/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.wsj.com/environmentalcapital/2008/10/27/street-cred-goldman-sachs-buys-into-carbon-credit-developer/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism/comment-page-1/#comment-5414991</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Greenfield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 03:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=225550#comment-5414991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is normal scientific practice and it is normal scientific practice to question whether it was done to achieve certain results.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is normal scientific practice and it is normal scientific practice to question whether it was done to achieve certain results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism/comment-page-1/#comment-5414990</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Greenfield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 03:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=225550#comment-5414990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course they do. They&#039;re flat earthers.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/flat-earth-society-like-obama-believes-in-global-warming/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course they do. They&#8217;re flat earthers.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/flat-earth-society-like-obama-believes-in-global-warming/" rel="nofollow">http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/flat-earth-society-like-obama-believes-in-global-warming/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Snyder</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/ex-director-of-top-global-warming-center-compares-warmunism-to-mccarthyism/comment-page-1/#comment-5414941</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ralph Snyder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 02:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=225550#comment-5414941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Galileo offered proof.  The Church could not understand it because it contravened the assumptions of theology.  Similarly now the denialists will not understand climatology because it contradicts what they know to be obviously true.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Galileo offered proof.  The Church could not understand it because it contravened the assumptions of theology.  Similarly now the denialists will not understand climatology because it contradicts what they know to be obviously true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 734/785 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 09:49:24 by W3 Total Cache -->