Hillary Clinton: We Have to Rein in Gun Ownership

hillary-clinton

Hillary Clinton is starting her campaign by writing off half the country. She still hasn’t learned what Dems learned during her husband’s time in office… that gun control is an election loser.

It alienates even many Democrats and Independents. And after last month, maybe Hillary should be pushing shoe control.

The former secretary of state, who would be the Democratic frontrunner in 2016 should she run, was delivering the keynote address at a conference held by the National Council for Behavioral Health, an organization that focuses on mental health.

“We have to rein in what has become [an] almost article of faith, that anybody can own a gun anywhere, anytime. And I don’t believe that,” she said.

Clinton, who argued it was possible to hold her position and still support the right to gun ownership, warned that unfettered access to guns could have dangerous consequences.

Now it’s time to start talking about the vast right wing conspiracy.

  • 4arepublic

    This is further proof that liberalism is a mental disease.

  • http://www.BanLiberals.com/ Ban Liberals

    Actually we have to rein in this hag.

    • Gee

      Dang – could have sworn that even an electron microscope couldn’t have found her brain. Maybe the tumor is larger than her brain

      • nomoretraitors

        Her problem isn’t her intelligence. It’s her morality (or lack thereof)

        • Jakareh

          You’re right, but she is no genius. Bill is much smarter than she is. Unfortunate, since his morals are even worse.

          • ahad_ha_amoratsim

            She married him — how smart does that make her? And how moral, for that matter?

          • The March Hare

            He wasn’t a husband, he was a ticket to the top.

          • ahad_ha_amoratsim

            Exactly. Hence my 2nd question.

  • Wolfthatknowsall

    Hitlery, you can “rein in” my gun ownership rights …

    … and I will help you. Piece by piece, starting with the lead.

    That was fun. I haven’t used that imagery for about 30 years.

    • Drakken

      If Hildabeast get elected, this country is done and cannot survive the damage this administration and the next that follows it. So you just might be needing those old skills once again, as a matter of survival.

    • T800

      IMO,such anti-gun proponents should be meeting a hail of massed fire every time they appear in public. Let nowhere be safe for such anti-Constitutionalists.

  • DogmaelJones1

    Hillary’s Words of Wisdom: “Two plus Two can equal Three, Five, Fifteen, and Sometimes Four.” “‘A’ can be ‘Non-A’ at the same time.” “Sun Spots are Caused by Global Warming.” “Americans Who Cling to Their Guns Must Have Their Hands Chopped Off, Muslim Style. That is the Only Way to Disarm Them.”

    • 95Theses

      Or, as we Reformed folk are not wont to say “A can be A and Non-A at the same time, and in the same relationship.”

      Ceci n’est pas une pipe!

  • Douglas Mayfield

    At the root of everything Hillary, a halfwit (?quarter-wit) statist, says and does is the assumption that individuals are utterly incapable of running their own lives and the government, that is, Queen Hillary the first and her suitably obedient courtiers, must take over and rule cradle to grave.

  • Enzo

    She hasn’t figured out yet she’s a loser.

  • Jakareh

    For once Hillary is right. The BLM, the IRS, the EPA, and the like should be stripped of all the guns in their possession. The guns should then be auctioned off to law-abiding citizens and the agencies abolished.

    • 95Theses

      Love it!

    • T800

      I read that there are FORTY Federal Agencies that have their own armed “law enforcement” personnel. It should only be the FBI,US Marshals,maybe the DEA. Certainly NOT F-Troop (ATF).

      also,FEDGOV agencies are MISSING(“lost” or stolen) several thousand of their issued firearms,some being full-auto machine guns. they don’t do any yearly audit,nor charge agents for their losing Federal property(firearms!!).

  • http://shugartpoliticalaction.shugartmedia.com/uncommonsense/ Chris Shugart

    Gun ownership isn’t so much an “article of faith” as it is an article of the Bill of Rights. That Hillary chooses not to believe it is evidence of her complete lack of regard for that pesky Constitution thing that always seems to get in the way.

  • glpage

    “And I don’t believe that.” That’s okay, she doesn’t believe in the Constitution either.

  • tagalog

    How many people believe that “anybody can own a gun, anywhere, anytime?” I’m a gun nut and I don’t believe that.

    Even the most adamant Second Amendment fan doesn’t say that any criminal or crazy person can own a gun anywhere, anytime. Nor does such a person say that ownership of a gun ANYWHERE or ANY TIME is OK. Gun rights advocates generally will say that a person who owns a gun at some place or time, who commits some crime while armed, ought to be punished more drastically than another person who doesn’t own a gun for the same purpose.

    But as I consider it, Hill, go for it. Preach gun control from the rooftops. Alienate about 70% of the electorate.

    • 95Theses

      Straw man down! Repeat, we’ve got a straw man down!

    • Sussex Girl

      Hey Tagalog, haven’t seen you here lately. Glad you’re back. I agree with you that criminals and those with mental illnesses that take them out of reality cannot be trusted to use firearms responsibly. However, we must NEVER lose sight of “shall not be infringed.” Never.

  • ahad_ha_amoratsim

    Gun owners: We have to rein in Hillary Clinton.
    This would be a great time to make a contribution to the gun rights organization of your choice.

  • http://www.stubbornthings.org NAHALKIDES

    Good ol’ Hillary still has a tin ear for politics – she’s no Bill Clinton, thankfully. She can probably only win races where a Republican has no real chance (as in her Senate win); in contested districts, she’s extremely beatable. Let’s hope the Presidency is not yet a safe Democratic seat.

  • 95Theses

    Actually, I’m glad she’s making gun control an issue. Because – if American electoral history means anything – every time a politician makes it an issue, for them it becomes a losing proposition.

  • truebearing

    How sweet. Hillary is playing to the base base. Now we can watch Hillary pretend she’s part Cherokee to ward off any threat from Elizabeth Warren.

    It was probably her Native American instincts that helped her avoid getting shot by those awful snipers in Bosnia. Or were they shooting at David Brock?

  • truebearing

    Yikes! It’s “The Picture of Hillary Grey!”

  • truebearing

    There is no “g” in “rein,” but there is one in “reign” and that is why good, OLD, Hillary is going after guns. She has to prove she can get the deranged class frothing at the mouth, or Soros will pull the plug on her, just like he did with Obama.

  • Phil Ossiferz Stone

    I am unnerved to have to admit there was a time when I would have gladly voted for this woman. I think it was before she and the Democratic Party both sold their souls to the Alinskyite far left for a mess of political pottage…

    Molan Labe, you monstrous old hag.

    • The March Hare

      She wrote her thesis on Alinsky. He was so impressed with her he offered her a job and she turned it down and married Bill.

      • Phil Ossiferz Stone

        Source material, please. That’s horrifying if true.

        • The March Hare

          From her Wikipedia entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_Clinton

          “Rodham wrote her senior thesis, a critique of the tactics of radical community organizer Saul Alinsky, under Professor Schechter.[25] (Years later, while she was First Lady, access to the thesis was restricted at the request of the White House and it became the subject of some speculation.)”

        • The March Hare

          I would also recommend reading her entry in The Freedom Center’s Discover the Networks, for which a link exists at the top of this web page we are now on. Select “Individuals” and then search for her name. Much more info.

  • Nabukuduriuzhur

    Have you noticed just how evil many senior Democrats look nowadays?

    It’s understandable with people who made a faustian deal like hillary and bill.

    But what about the others?

    Romans 1 gives a progression that we have seen in many of the 1960s radicals-turned-politicians, and those that came after:

    “18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness,

    19 because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them.

    20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse.

    21 For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

    22 Professing to be wise, they became fools,

    23 and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and [o]crawling creatures.
    24 Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, so that their bodies would be dishonored among them. 25 For they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.
    26 For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural,

    27 and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error.
    28 And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper,

    29 being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips,

    30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents,

    31 without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful;

    32 and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them.”