Hillary Will Be Alinsky’s Third Term

hillary-clintonAfter two terms in the White House by one Alinsky disciple, the United States is divided as never before. One in four Americans are ready for their state to secede from the United States. Three quarters of Americans don’t believe that their children will have a better future than they did.

To anyone else this would be a failure, but to an Alinskyite despair and doom are a success story. Saul Alinsky wrote in Rules for Radicals that the organizer must “rub raw the resentments of the people of the community; fan the latent hostilities of many of the people to the point of overt expression.”

He must make the people “feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future.”

Obama has made Americans feel frustrated, defeated, futureless and lost. And if they were hoping that the next Democrat will actually bring hope and change, instead of hatred and despair, they will be deeply disappointed. While Obama learned his community organizing skills at the feet of Alinsky’s twisted disciples, Hillary Clinton learned them from Alinsky. Hillary is even worse than Obama.

In the introduction to her senior thesis on Alinsky, Hillary Rodham thanked him for his time and for offering her a job. But those dispassionate words were covering up a much deeper relationship.

The Free Beacon’s recent release of an exchange of letters begins with Hillary anxiously waiting for the release of Rules for Radicals.

“Has it come and I somehow missed the fulfillment of Revelation?” the former Methodist “Goldwater Girl” turned radical leftist wonders.

“You are being rediscovered again as the New Left-type politicos are finally beginning to think seriously about the hard work and mechanics of organizing,” she writes.

In her thesis, Hillary had attempted to depict Alinsky as a mainstream American icon, writing, “His are the words used in our schools and churches, by our parents and their friends, by our peers. The difference is that Alinsky really believes in them”. The media attempted to defend her Alinsky ties by claiming that he was not ideologically of the left. Hillary’s letter however gives the lie to that.

Alinsky was not mainstream. There was nothing American about him. He was a man of the hard left.

For Alinsky, Hillary Rodham represented a connection to the future.

In the introduction to Rules for Radicals, he wrote of her generation of leftist radicals, “It is what they do and will do that will give meaning to what I and the radicals of my generation have done with our lives.”

That is what the last six years have been. The misery, the rising prices, the racial hatred and despair were the meaning that Barack Obama brought to Saul Alinsky’s life. They are the fertile dark territories on which Hillary Rodham Clinton means to build a horrifying future.

Alinsky was more than a thesis subject to Clinton. And vice versa. Her letter to him is cheerfully intimate. His secretary’s response references “his feelings about you”. The year was 1971. Hillary was deep in her political activities and had begun dating Bill Clinton. Three years earlier, Alinsky had offered her a job. Hillary however had chosen to go on working through the system. That continues to be her tactic today.

Hillary Clinton didn’t reject Alinsky, as she and the media have tried to claim. His tactics and worldview continue to inform her own. But Hillary, Rodham or Clinton, understood the importance of adaptation.

But so did Alinsky.

“As an organizer I start from where the world is,” Alinsky wrote in Rules for Radicals. “That means working in the system.”

“If the real radical finds that having long hair sets up psychological barriers to communication and organization, he cuts his hair,” he added.

Hillary’s pantsuits, her $1,500 haircuts and her time with the Democratic Leadership Council were not a rejection of Alinsky. They were the tactics of a Rules for Radicals leftist working within the system.

Alinsky would have understood and approved.

In her first memoir, Hillary Clinton claimed that she had broken with Alinsky over her “belief that the system could be changed from within.”

But Alinsky had believed that as well. Hillary never broke with him, but she had to maintain the appearance of having left behind a radical flirtation to become a mainstream Democrat. That appearance, like everything else about her, was and is a lie.

Quoting Lenin, Alinsky wrote in Rules for Radicals, “They have the guns and therefore we are for peace and for reformation through the ballot. When we have the guns then it will be through the bullet.”

“And it was,” he added.

For now it’s still reformation through the ballot, overseen by a propagandist media and its campaigns of dirty tricks. But the radicals still dream of the day when they have the guns and Americans have nothing.

Despite the media’s attempts to dismiss Hillary Clinton’s ties to Alinsky, the way that they had tried to wave away Obama’s ties to Bill Ayers, she maintained her dirty political connections with Alinsky’s Industrial Areas Foundation even inside the white walls of the White House.

A year after the letter, Alinsky was buried in the cold hard ground of Cook County after an attack of the heart that no one knew he had. By then Hillary Clinton was campaigning for George McGovern.

“The key word for an Alinsky-type organizing effort is ‘power.’” Hillary wrote in her thesis. “’As he says: ‘No individual or organization can negotiate without power to compel negotiations.’”

The Clintons have gathered enormous wealth and power to themselves. As Obama’s radical fires burn across the heartland, as factories close, unemployment lines bulge and the people despair, the Clintons are positioning themselves as the sensible moderates who will take a step back from his radical ways. For the scam to work, they had to play the long game of pretending not to be radicals.

Hillary had to be seen as leaving Alinsky behind to truly fulfill his vision of a ruined nation brought to its knees.

In 1971, on the cusp of her latest meeting with Alinsky, Hillary Rodham was coming to some crucial decisions that would determine the expression of her radicalism and extremism. Influencing her in this regard was none other than Saul Alinsky.

From his teachings, Hillary came to understand that power mattered more than symbolism and that effectiveness came before integrity.

“All effective actions require the passport of morality,” Alinsky wrote. Hillary carries the passport of morality. Its pages however are blank. Radicals of the left are not citizens of any country or members of any religion. Their only nation is their own ideology. Their only allegiance is to their radicalism.

“We have the serious business and joy of much work ahead,” Hillary wrote to him. Alinsky would soon be dead, but Hillary would be carrying on his work by abusing her advisory position with the House Committee on the Judiciary to bring down the President of the United States.

McGovern had lost, but Hillary Clinton would have her way no matter what the ballots said. And her way was the Alinsky way.

Now the White House has been reserved for her. The Democratic Party is waiting to anoint another of Saul Alinsky’s disciples for a third term of misery and terror in the radical plot to destroy America.

*

Don’t miss Shillman Journalism Fellow Daniel Greenfield on this week’s Glazov Gang discussing “ISIS Rising”:

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Subscribe to Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, and LIKE it on Facebook.

  • Yehuda Levi

    I am not worried about Hillary’s gender – I am worried about her mind.

    Just as with Obama, opponents of voting for Hillary will be called “sexist” or “woman-haters” in the same way Obama non-voters were called “racist.” Her campaign will celebrate her gender as the new ‘first.’

    But her gender has never been a problem for me – it is her ideology – her thought process. Greenfield is absolutely right that this will be one more term of leftwing dogmatism which will be as harmful to the country as the last two terms of Obama.

    She won’t make good decisions with a poor political ideology. As they say in the computer business, “Garbage in, garbage out.”

    • Clee White

      Sadly, you are correct. In January, 2017, Obama will hand Monica Lewinsky’s ex-boyfriend’s wife the wrecking ball and she will finish what he began.

      • TeresaJDraper

        My Uncle Levi recently got BMW M4 Coupe just by working from a home pc… this page becomerich.com

        • 11bravo

          Does he turn tricks too?

    • http://libertyandculture.blogspot.com/ Jason P

      Sad but true, she’ll try to ride the gender wagon and hide her radical side from the public. Her image is designed to win the election but will she have a mandate to make radical changes? Remember that Obama lucked out with a financial collapse that looked like armageddon. This gave him a mandate and congress for radical change without his even asking for it.

      Just as McCain suffered from guilt by association with Bush, it needs to be our goal to make sure Hillary suffers from guilt by association with Obama. Greenfield is helping here.

  • William

    Good grief! Not this shet again. Media and sites such as this will try to portray Hillary as some kind of radical leftist, even a revolutionary. And most people will be fooled again.

    • camp7

      Not so much that she’s a cold-blooded Alinsky fan and an absolute power hungry liar. More so that she was willing to let Americans die in Benghazi and her earlier attack on the character of a child rape victim. A distinctive unambiguous style and pattern to promote her own vindictive career. She’s an insult to women. The madam is a witch.

    • Clee White

      “Media and sites such as this…”
      Truth is revolutionary in a time such as this! The only people who will be fooled are those who choose her at the poles in 2016. “Radical leftist”, maybe, “revolutionary”, doubtful. Pure, unadulterated evil, absolutely!

    • Joe Esposito

      Your remarks are proof that Hilary Rodham can not be trusted. Your leftist BullShet is so typical of the Marxist within you. Rodham is a Leftist radical and must be stopped.

      • William

        No, she is a corporatist establishment Democrat. And a war monger.

        • truebearing

          You think solely in terms of political labels and leftist talking points. You show no indication of true insight. Dogma is strangling your brain, such as it is.

          • William

            Why not label politicians? If a politician is a corrupt establishment corporatist then let’s call it what it is.

            And you don’t need to be a leftist to understand Hillary’s real agendas.

          • truebearing

            If a leftist ideologue’s brain is constipated with dogma, let’s call it what it is.

            Labeling corrupt politicians is fine, but you broadbrush anyone who isn’t a communist as corrupt, when communists are inherently corrupt, making you a world class hypocrite.

            Ubderstanding Hillary’s agenda can easily be accomplished by reading Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals.” She’s a leftist.

    • tryingtopickaname

      Go figure…an accurate depiction of her ideology, backed up by something not in the left’s lexicon—facts. Yes, sure would be a shame if most people were exposed to harsh reality, as opposed to the amorphous narrative of ‘hope and change’, ‘we are the ones we’ve been waiting for’, and ‘it takes a village to raise a child’ that is the Bible of the gullible left.

      • William

        The Left know exactly who she is, and would like to see her in prison for war crimes. She also tried to outlaw flag burning. She is anything BUT an Alinskyite.

        • truebearing

          The Left should be in prison for treason and sedition. I hope she can join all of you someday.

          BTW, when you get to prison after a very short trial, don’t mind the hammering. It’s just the carpenters working on the newly expanded gallows.

          • William

            Yeah, imprison or kill everyone who doesn’t agree with your politics.

            You sound like Hillary.

          • truebearing

            No, I’m just trying to think like a leftist. I figure they deserve what they have dished out. And I didn’t say kill or imprison everyone who disagrees with me. I save that honor for seditious leftists and Muslims.

            You have heard of the 20th Century, haven’t you? Leftists killed at least 100,000,000 of their own citizens during those halcyon days of marxist utopia. How are you going to rationalize that inconvenient truth away?

          • William

            Ah, so you want to exterminate Muslims too.

            Let me guess, you’re a Republican? loL!

          • truebearing

            Reading comprehension problems, yet again? I think you will notice upon reading the comment in its entirety that said “seditious” Muslims. Are you saying all Muslims are seditious?

            “Let me guess, you’re a Republican? loL!”

            Let me guess, you’re 11 years old.

          • William

            I know how right wingers think, that simply being a Muslim or a Communist is seditious.

          • bigjulie

            You got a problem with exterminating Muslims??

        • Guest

          And Hitler was not a Marxist, right? Or even a Fascist?

          • William

            Hitler wanted all Marxists dead. He was a fascist.

    • Virgil Hilts

      YOU certainly are!

    • 1Indioviejo1

      Yes, the people will be fooled again into voting for another Marxist-Leninist in spite of the knowledge out there.

      • William

        Americans would never vote for a Marxist. And if there was knowledge of a political candidate being a Marxist, it would be brought to light.

        • truebearing

          Obama is a Gramscian Marxist. It was brought to light, but the media tried to block it. The word still got out, but people ignored it. Try another lie. That one isn’t working.

          • William

            I doubt you know who Gramsci or Marx were. In reality, Obama is a Conservadem. An establishment corporate Democrat. And a war monger who has a thing for killing Muslims. Marxists are leftists, and not supporters of private health insurance. In America the Left see Obama as a war criminal and puppet of Wall Street.

          • truebearing

            You doubt a lot of things. That is your stock response when you can’t argue a point, hence its tattered, worn appearance.

            I doubt you know who Gramsci was and I know you don’t understand Marx. Only a fool would adhere to his failed theories after all of the disastrous attempts to put them into practice. Surely, no one as sharp as yourself would be so stupid as to believe in Marxism.

            Say, how is your work on the square wheel coming? Don’t let those Roundists get you down, just because their wheel actually works. Keep hammering away, and use your head if the hammer breaks. It’s harder.

          • William

            I studied Poli Sci at university which is why I have to laugh at people who fear Commies taking over.

          • MukeNecca

            Yes, and Obama has studied Law at Harvard. What a pair of dunces you are.

          • Debbie G

            Watch out Tru, she’s bringing out the credentials.

          • Guest

            In plain English, Poli Sci means, a communist who was educated by communists, and taught to lie, lie, lie about it.

          • William

            No, it means political science.

        • Debbie G

          It has been brought to light over and over again. You just can’t seem to get it through that thick skull of yours.

          • William

            The only people who believe the US government has been infiltrated by radical leftists are conspiracy theory nuts. Alex Jones/David Horowitz types.

          • Debbie G

            The only people who believe the US government has NOT been infiltrated by radical lefts are ignoramuses. William types.

          • William

            McCarthyism is soooo 1960s.

            Communists do not call the shots in Washington, corporations do. Wake up.

          • Debbie G

            I wouldn’t DREEEEAM of being out of vogue, darling.

          • William

            If you fear Communists then you’re still stuck in the 20th Century.

          • Debbie G

            I appreciate your concern.

          • bigjulie

            You got a problem with being stuck in the 20th Century??

          • Guest

            Then what do you fear, if anything, besides thinking?

          • Guest

            And they want to rule the world at a whole new level.

  • truebearing

    Alinsky embraced evil. He taught evil. He dedicated his book “Rules For Radicals” to evil. Hillary dedicated herself to the teachings of a disciple of evil. It’s written all over her cold, devious face.

    “They have the guns and therefore we are for peace and for reformation through the ballot. When we have the guns then it will be through the bullet.”

    Why don’t any Republicans stand on the floor of the Senate or House, make a scene, and read Alinsky quoting Lenin in Rules for Radicals? The public needs to know about Alinsky’s intent, and Hillary’s devotion to it. The ideological blood lines run straight from Lenin to Hillary, and Americans need to hear the ruthless, evil thinking that killed tens of millions of Soviet citizens… and turned Hillary on.

    • Sheik Yerbouti

      It should be obvious the GOP was infiltrated and is a shell of its former self. I doubt 40% of the GOP are even conservative anymore. Instead we have an array of liberal republicans. Not a one has any fortitude.

      • truebearing

        Ted Cruz and Mike Lee have shown courage, and Cruz in particular is pretty clever in dealing with the Left. You can tell they agree by the number of attacks they have made on him.

        Trey Gowdy has been fiery and clearly isn’t intimidated by the Left.

        • Sheik Yerbouti

          OK, but we used to have a wall. Now we have a loose net.

      • ricpic

        If the Republicans were seriously in opposition to the hard left the country would be plastered with billboards consisting of one word: BENGHAZI. And that would be done NOW, long before Hillary’s media makeover to Mary Poppins.

        • Sheik Yerbouti

          I’d wager she’s aiming for Tammy Wynnette. She could only pull off Mary Poppins if she carried an ax around with her.

      • cathnealon

        This is interesting. ‘Infiltration’ suggests subterfuge as opposed to plain old political expediency.

        And Lenin did say that infiltrating the opposition was the first order of business. So who are the infiltrators?

        The GOP has been in a vise grip since 2009 with the ‘throw ‘em all out’ cry of the Tea Party and the attack from the Left.

        In my neck of the woods the county Democrats have jumped on this and ‘infiltrated’ the Tea Party causing a major upset.

        • Sheik Yerbouti

          Look at the Cantor situation. It worked so well I guarantee you will see it over and over. Leftists have zero electoral honor and will win “at any cost”, even their ethics.

          • cathnealon

            What “ethics,” I’m confused.

    • trickyblain

      He also quotes Ghandi, Churchill, Lincoln, Sam Adams and Jefferson within this passage, which is his analysis on the “getting vs. keeping” power, and the inherent historical “moral” dilemmas that come with it. If you think he was a Marxist, you’ve never read anything by him, save what your bubble masters want you to read.

      And the dedication to “Satan”? He was an atheist. And he was an agitator with a well-developed sense of humor. He explicitly wanted to draw breathless hysterics from his critics.

      As your post attests, he did his job well,

      • Forrest Coyne

        Thank you for clearing that up.

  • Paula-LiveFreeorDie

    I would have used the phrase “would be.” Heaven help us, this is not a fait à complis!

  • Elizabeth capecod

    I think republicans should be very quiet and lull democrats into making Hillary their choice, because I think she is damaged and can be beaten.

    • Michael Garfinkel

      Very true, but only if the Republicans are ruthless and direct in exposing her for what she is.

      David Horowitz thinks they’re too polite.

      Golly, I think so too.

      • 1Indioviejo1

        I see it just as you see it. We may have peaked as a nation already, and Hillary is just the Coup D’ Grace.

      • Elizabeth capecod

        [Very true, but only if the Republicans are ruthless and direct in exposing her for what she is.]

        That’s a tactic they’re going to have to use with any dem nominee. or else lose another election, because we know damn well that they will use that tactic against our nominee.

    • 1Indioviejo1

      She may not be beaten by a RINO GOP. It may prove to ‘disruptive of Business as usual.

  • http://ruleofreason.blogspot.com/ Edward Cline

    While Hillary sat at Alinsky’s feet to absorb his “wisdom,” Alinsky sat at the feet of Frank Nitti, Chicago gangster and Al Capone’s proxy “executive,” to absorb his criminal “wisdom” on how to win friends and make enemies. Then, of course, there’s Obama, an Alinsky man from head to toe. And it all took place in Chicago, capital of corrupt politics after Washington D.C. How appropriate! Really, do people need to be hit over the head a thousand times to see the connection between these criminals? I think they ought to be. Hillary’s and Obama’s ideology of power and exercising it is Frank Nitti’s by way of Alinsky. Bill Clinton was too busy pinching women’s bottoms to bother much with ideology, but his wife too likely was his mentor, as well. Hillary was the harridan behind his throne.

    • Virgil Hilts

      Edward. You Wrote: “How appropriate! Really, do people need to be hit over the head a
      thousand times to see the connection between these criminals?” Answer? YES!!! The beatings will continue until morale improves!

    • 1Indioviejo1

      Bill Clinton was busy raping women, but the Marxist-Leninist ideology fits him perfectly. They get to play for all the power and all of the money. Hillary was the power behind him, but now they need her in front.

      • Nabukuduriuzhur

        That is socialism, all right.

        I wrote in National Wave of Foolishness ”

        The third reason that Socialism appeals to people is that it allows men and women to act like bestial beasts, without any sort of restraint upon their behavior. Socialists cab lie, kill, cheat, sleep with anything that moves and it’s “OK” because INDIVIDUALS HAVE
        NO VALUE UNDER SOCIALISM. Socialism in its various forms has killed more people and enslaved more people than any other system of thought that the world has ever produced.

        But, if you are a “good Socialist,” you can rationalize it all. It’s for “the greater good,” right? Which is one of the reasons that the evil philosophy of Socialism is so dangerous: it’s true adherents can do any Evil and rationalize those Evils with religious fervor. Since the individual does not matter in Socialism, Evil committed toward individuals is easy for the Socialist to rationalize.

        Until something happens to them, of course. Which is why the good
        Liberals never are concerned about bad things like crime or disease or the loss of jobs until it happens to them.”

  • Spinoneone

    Somebody need to design and sell a bumper sticker that says: “No Obama 3/No HC”

  • 11bravo

    The one thing I may be missing (feel free to help me out), is…WHY?!!
    Durbin – Reid – Pelosi – Clinton – Schumer – Gutierrez – Schakowsky – Boxer – Obama – Axelrod – Emanuel.
    Why bring a country to its knees. These people will be dead in 20-25 years. Is it to just watch it “burn baby burn”. They must see the new society will be worse for the average American.
    Also, people like Pelosi, and Schumer must think Barry and Hildebeast don’t really want to go that far. These are the clueless Progs – the radicals mean it – but I still can’t figure out the big picture WHY?

    • Michael Garfinkel

      You might just as well ask why is the presence of Evil in the world so enduring.

    • http://www.hubpages.com/profiles/maven101 LarryConners

      To answer your question of Why, simply follow the money…Every political hack on your list is corrupt, devious, and wholly devoted to their own personal enrichment…The future of America means nothing to them, they live only for the present and how they can benefit…

      • 11bravo

        Pelosi and her husband are worth 20-45 million – they don’t really need the money. So…Why are they trying to drag us into a failed ideology?

        • http://www.hubpages.com/profiles/maven101 LarryConners

          The amount of money they have does not matter to these cretins…It’s the accumulation of money and the power it brings that motivates them…

          Nancy Pelosi is one of the richest members of Congress. In 2007, she ranked 6th in the House in total wealth, with assets of at least $62.5 million. Despite that, she shamelessly exploited her perquisites as Speaker of the House, bilking taxpayers for millions in luxury travel, food, and wine for herself, family, and friends — until the very end….She insisted on a 200 plus seat aircraft, furnished by the US Air Force, at taxpayer expense, to shuttle her, her family, and staff between Washington, DC and California…
          ..

    • liz

      Good question – why burn your own house down?
      It’s because they are delusional megalomaniacs, who irrationally believe Utopia will rise out of the ashes of what they’ve destroyed.

      • 11bravo

        But they must know it has never worked EVER! Ashes are ashes.
        I used to be all “help the poor” until I realized (after reading Hayek, Sowell etc..) that people need a paycheck/job, not a hand-out.
        Are these people really so stupid/brilliant in their own minds?

    • Daniel_Greenfield

      They get money and power in the short term. In the long term they believe that they’re building a better world. And they’ll go on believing even when everything is on fire.

      Because the old world has to die for their wonderful new world to be born.

  • Hank Rearden

    I am confused. Hillary is dedicated to “changing the system.” But what has that meant for her? Two houses. She and Bill worth upwards of $100 million by peddling influence. In what way has she changed the system for anybody but her? Same with Bill Ayers. He hates America, but he kept the money.

  • carpe diem 36

    she is a very good example of the saying that people rise to the level of their incompetence. I see her as a confused little person who held on to her betraying husband because she is nothing as her own person. She never expressed a single original thought or displayed even a minimal understanding of what America is and what made it successful, she only knew how to take advantage of its successful people and mooch much money out of it as possible. Her crown achievement, if you can call it, is her eediot daughter who has achieved nothing and was given everything without any effort. That she is worse than obama goes without saying. I hope people will wise up and see her as what she is and keep her from ever being in a position of even influencing policy let alone being our president, may god protect us.

  • physicsnut

    i saw David Horowitz on C-SPAN – great – and repubs ought to listen, for a change.

    • truebearing

      Yes, they should, and the fools should have been listening to him for decades.

  • mtnhikerdude

    “Radical plot to destroy America”. That has been the End Game of this administration from day one. It may be completed before Hussein leaves office in 2016 . The America I grew up with is gone. A victim of the insanity of political correctness and multiculturalism. The final nail in America’s coffin will be pounded by 2016 . Sanity will never again prevail at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Washington , D.C. If she doesn’t die she will be elected.

  • DrMaxHathaway

    Hillary and Bil need a visit from the Inglorious Bastards so they can be properly outfitted with the appropriate warning labels.

  • William

    In reality Hillary was a Goldwater Girl. Just recently she was warning that Soviet-Style Communism would return to Russia.

    • Guest

      Which she has said, she no longer is, and could have run the Soviet Union right, if given the chance.

  • Harry_the_Horrible

    The problem isn’t Hillary! or Obama – it is the people who voted for them.
    If the electorate goes for Hillary!, then Saul Alinsky IS the electorate.

  • DennisMets

    the democraps will get hillary elected by shaming white americans again, last time they told them if they did not support or back and vote for a black like obannana then they were racist, they will be told this time if they dont vote for billery they will be sexist and not ready for a woman leader we all know this is going to happen

  • nimbii

    When an individual commits to the revolution they get to travel down the road of shortcuts. Revolutionaries get to be evil and evil is liberating and exhilarating.

    Evil sets revolutionaries above the bonds of the institutions that build and maintain our civilizations. Evil allows the revolutionary the existential vision to rise above the conventional long road of slogging through tortured political campaigns and the endless legislative alliances required to work within the system responsibly to bring about change.

    Revolution opens up an exciting set of creative destructions in the name of social justice. Revolutionaries become romantic icons implementing the never ending Marxist agenda of issues that are of course, never about the issue and always about the revolution.

    So, if you reject anarchy’s short-lived thrill ride to self-destruction because the odds are against a comfortable suburban DC retirement, what else is left but the revolution?

  • s;vbkr0boc,klos;

    Misery and terror. Yes.

  • 12grace

    G-d help us! He is the only way that America can be saved from this evil that has infiltrated our complete infrastructure.

  • bob e

    a deft title for this piece mr g .. as the country braces itself for barry o’fraud’s
    destructive finale, lady macdeath slouches like the beast to washington ..

  • Robert Cammarata

    Please, Greenfield, do whatever it takes to get your home state to secede. Then I will work to close the borders to keep people like you out.

  • edgineer

    Why is it no one points out that Alinsky was a Marxist? That Marxism permeated the entire radical movement of the 1960s and 70s? That Hillary and Bill and BO were (and undoubtedly are) Marxists working to impose a Marxist (Communist) state?

    • William

      Maybe because Alinsky was not a Marxist. He called them “useful idiots” and trouble-makers.

      • edgineer

        Yeah right. And he never plagiarized the Communist Manifesto either huh?

      • edgineer

        Let me repeat: Marxism permeated the entire radical movement of the 1960s and 1970s.

        • William

          Marxism had fallen out of popularity in America by 1940. People who cried about commies taking over in the 60s and 70s were throwbacks who feared the civil rights and sexual liberation movements of the time. Take the antiwar movement for example, how so many resisters were called Marxists or pro-Communists simply because they opposed the Vietnam war. That was one of the reasons Rev. MLK Jr. was called a Communist, even though he was not a Communiust,

          • edgineer

            In 1987 the Communist Party Of The USA joined the Democratic Party. Any time you want to join the Communist Party Google “CPUSA” and click on their link. You are right that the vast majority despise Marxism.

      • Guest

        Well, I can sleep peacefully now.

  • William

    Why fear Alinsky?
    What in specific is so threatening about him.

    • Guest

      That’s like asking what’s to fear in Karl Marx, or Mein Kampf. So, try reading them if you want something specific.

      • William

        I’ve read Alinsky, and books about him. I don’t see what’s so scary.

  • Nabukuduriuzhur

    I’ve seen the “hillary look” in most women my age that hillary has. They simply are wearing out from living like h—. The drugs, the partying, the alcohol binges, the unhealthy diets, etc., all take their toll. Despite being 31 to 49, most women of my generation look much older than they are. The lifestyles of party, party, party is catching up to them.

    Do the Democrats really want someone that unhealthy to run for president?

  • NJK

    She won’t win, because we won’t let her.

    ” A year after the letter, Alinsky was buried in the cold hard ground of Cook County after an attack of the heart that no one knew he had.”

    I hope that she meets the same end.

  • Bandido

    Hillary will win because the electorate has been beaten into the ground by 50 years of a radical leftism that is as remorseless as it is irresistible to the masses.

  • USARetired

    Hillary is a ‘loose canon’, mentally disturbed, and unfit for any kind of public office!