Hollywood’s Muslim Lies

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. He is completing a book on the international challenges America faces in the 21st century.


jack-ryan-shadow-recruitIn real life, terrorists are almost always Muslim. In the movie theater, they are anything but. America’s fictional secret agents, covert operatives and rogue cops who play by their own rules have spent more time battling Serbian terrorists than Muslim terrorists. 

Before September 11, 24′s Jack Bauer was fighting the international menace of Serbian terrorism. Serbian terrorists also showed up in 1999′s Diplomatic Siege when their “Serbian Liberation Front” took over a US embassy and in 1997′s The Peacemaker with George Clooney rushing to stop a Serb from detonating a nuke in New York City.

The United States has remained unscathed by Serbian terrorism, though the same can’t be said for Peter Weller, the star of Diplomatic Siege, and Mimi Leder, the director of The Peacemaker, but not by Muslim terrorist attacks. Despite September 11, the Fort Hood Massacre and the Boston Marathon bombings, Hollywood has resolutely kept its eye on the real threat.

Serbian terrorism.

This weekend, Ride Along, which features Ice “F___ the Police” Cube playing a cop, knocked Lone Survivor out of the top spot at the box office, and once again takes on the terrible threat of… Serbian terrorism.

When the Serbs aren’t available, the Russians have to step in. The Russians are more likely to appear as villains after the fall of the Soviet Union than during the Communist era. It’s as if the end of Soviet Communism finally set Hollywood free to join in the fun of Boris and Natasha villains without any of the guilt about red-baiting.

When Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit featured a terrorist cell in Dearborn, even though Muslims  dominate the area, the villains were shown operating out of a Russian Orthodox church and getting their cues from a priest reading the bible while the terrorists cried out, “Slava Bogu” or “Praise God.”

It would have been unrealistic to show them praising Allah instead.

Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit is the latest attempt at making a Tom Clancy movie without the Tom Clancy part. Sum of All Fears, one of the first movies about terrorism to come out after September 11, jettisoned Clancy’s Muslim villains.

Its writer Dan Pyne dismissed Islamic terrorism as a “cliche”; even though a plot can’t be a cliche when it never appears in movies, only in real life. Pyne however found a more realistic villain. “I think, there was some neo-nationalist activity in Holland, and there was stuff going on in Spain and in Italy. So it seemed like a logical and lasting idea that would be universal.”

Nothing is more universal than the threat of neo-nationalists in Holland. Dutch neo-nationalism is an enduring world menace that everyone can relate to.

The neo-nationalists of the Netherlands that Pyne had discovered were probably Pim Fortuyn’s party. Fortuyn was a Sociology professor who favored drug legalization, gay marriage and less Muslim immigration. The neo-nationalist threat of the Netherlands did not prove lasting when around the time that Sum of All Fears was playing in theaters; Fortuyn was murdered by a leftist who, like Pyne, worried about the plight of the Muslims.

In an even bigger cliche, Theo van Gogh, who had just finished directing May 6th, a movie about the assassination of Pim Fortuyn, was murdered by Mohammed Bouyeri, a Muslim immigrant from Morocco who told the victim’s mother that he could have no empathy for her because she was a non-Muslim.

It was the sort of ridiculous cliche that Dan Pyne would never have put into a script.

Instead Dan Pyne went on to write a remake of the Manchurian Candidate in which Communist China was replaced by the “Manchurian Corporation”. He’s currently working on a movie featuring a Syrian rescue worker who gets mistaken for a terrorist while trying to save lives during Hurricane Katrina.

It’s a cliche, but it’s the kind of cliche that Hollywood likes.

If a movie is made about September 11 a decade from, now, the villains will probably be Serbian nationalists. It would be a cliche to have 19 Muslim hijackers murder 3,000 people. And then the camera will linger meaningfully on a Muslim rescuer wrongly taken into custody by a bigoted NYPD cop who is overlooking the real Serbian/Dutch neo-nationalist corporate villains.

The Serbians, Russians and Netherlands neo-nationalists are only the understudies who get called in when the usual villains, right-wing extremists who want to false flag America into a war with the Muslims, are on vacation.

After 24 got done with the Serbian terror threat, it defaulted to the real threat of government warmongers trying to fake a Muslim terror threat. After 9/11, 24′s second season’s story was about an evil government conspiracy to fake a Muslim terrorist attack. Anything else would have been a cliche. And to avoid cliches, the series used variations of the same plot in three seasons.

When the Serbs went on strike last year, White House Down brought in a villainous Speaker of the House with a Jewish last name to assassinate a black president in order to sabotage his treaty with Iran. The movie lost so much money that Sony blamed its quarterly $197 million loss on it.

Serbian terrorism had struck again.

When a straightforward presentation flops, Hollywood finds ways of embedding the same old message into more fantastic fare. Last summer, Iron Man 3, Star Trek Into Darkness and the Lone Ranger all had minor variations of the same story about false flag attacks that were orchestrated by governments or powerful interests connected to them. This Trutherism explosion was just another case of Hollywood carefully avoiding cliches.

Nowhere in all these tales of evil corporations and governments is there a movie about an entertainment industry so intertwined with government that it not only helped pick the country’s current leader, but it constantly releases propaganda films attempting to revise reality according to his worldview. That would be a cliché; much like the idea of that industry filming false flag movies depicting the favorite villains of the Clinton Administration carrying out ridiculously implausible acts of terror to retroactively justify its focus on the Serbs instead of Al Qaeda.

Hollywood stands as firmly against depicting Muslim terrorism as Hollywood Communists after the Hitler-Stalin pact did against anti-Nazi films. If they had been positioned further up the ladder back then, instead of mainly being relegated to writing scripts, we would no doubt have a catalog of movies featuring Yankee warmongers plotting to stage fake Nazi attacks on America.

Hollywood’s ideological hostility to reality however has not proven to be very profitable.

The Peacemaker, a movie written and co-produced by the Cockburns, whose politics are slightly to the left of Stalin, was the inaugural feature from the failed Spielberg-Geffen-Katzenberg Dreamworks studio and disappointed critics and audiences. The Cockburns would never try their hand at film fiction again unless you count American Casino, their “documentary” about the financial collapse, which had a financial collapse of its own with an opening weekend of $1,397.

Sum of All Fears, the movie inspired by the Netherlands neo-nationalist threat, was the weakest performer of the Tom Clancy movies when accounting for ticket price inflation and full budget. And it still had a much better opening weekend than Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit.

Failure however won’t stop Hollywood from alerting the nation to the terrorist threat lurking in Orthodox Churches or the Dutch neo-nationalists trying to nuke our cities. Hollywood’s handpicked leaders were the ones who made the country vulnerable to Islamic terrorism and their industry has gone on covering up for them with movies in which the villains can be anyone and everyone except the real killers.

*

Don’t miss Ann-Marie Murrell‘s video interview with Daniel Greenfield on Robert Gates’ Revelations Confirm Horowitz’s “Party of Defeat,” Abandoning Iraq, How Americans Died For a War Obama Didn’t Believe In, The Release of Terrorist Lawyer Lynne Stewart, and much, much more:

Part I:

Part II:

To sign up for The Glazov Gang, Click here.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

  • James Foard

    Bravo!

  • Aditya Vivek Barot

    Aren’t they your people? You sure you’re not some kind of troll determined to divert out attention from their manical, paranoid and insatiable hatred?

    I really respect your work but you have failed to account for the group motives of the the men who are in charge of the world’s slickest propaganda machine.

    Why are their villians, inevitably, members of a group that the Hollywood bosses fear and loathe in equal parts? Is this not an example to brainwash us poor, unrepaired barbarians into hating ourselves and elevate and slavishly worship the Most Oppressed People (Ever) TM and any and all groups that they coopt to assist with Euthanizing the stupid Gentiles west of the Rhiene?

    • BenZacharia

      Isn’t there a Sanskrit version of Stormfront where ‘true Aryans’ like you can spew your vile racism?

      • Aditya Vivek Barot

        Is there any place in America where one can speculate on the motives of the Ones without being subjected to an Unholy Inquisition? Or not face the Commissars?

        This blog freely comments on the motives of diverse Muslim nations and other equally diverse groups and individuals who are all united by their anti-western and anti-Americanism. And I love it! I really love the sultan. He’s the first thing I read, groggy eyed, chain-smoking with black coffee in hand.

        However, I have ever read an actual analysis of the indisputable anti-white and anti-Gentile animus exhibited through Leftism and it’s antecedents and its agnates and cognates.

        I would like the Sultan to take an honest stab at it. So far, we have Larry Auster and David Duke, and everything in between such as MacDonald and the exceedingly crude and vile Atzmon.

        If you weren’t a bully and thug quick to smear and destroy heretics (a trait, ironically attributed by a majority of Community, to the vile gentile.

        If you weren’t a compete dunce, you’d notice that I expressed a snark (poorly) in a sultanesque manner, but against a real sacred cow, and not a flavor of the month (a la AIDS victims) who will be forgotten and dethroned as Kings of Victimhood.

        Is pattern recognition a crime? Then I am guilty and so is the sultan who is much better than me. If the crime is noticing one community, then you are acting like the people the sultan is, allegedly, fighting. If you had a modicum of intellect and sensitivity, you’d appreciate the true irony of your ignorant, vile and, sadly, all to predictable insult.

        • BenZacharia

          “vile… ignorant… predictable”
          That describes your continued screeds against Jews. Yes, I have read many of your other mental masturbations. What happened? Did your receive your Jew hatred with your mothers milk? Or do the take all the best clients in El Segundo leaving only the dregs that even the public defenders won’t take?

        • BenZacharia

          “thug”* you speak of irony, yet use that word.

          *Derived from “thuggee” one of Hindus many contributions to the world. I do like my PJs though.

          • Aditya Vivek Barot

            Wow! My very first stalker. I don’t know whether to call 911 or be flattered.

          • BenZacharia

            Reading what you publish is called ‘paying attention’. Sheesh! Self-important a$$hat!

          • tagalog

            Would you please define the term “a$$hat?” What would such an item actually be?

            You still wear PJs? Do you still live with your parents?

          • Aditya Vivek Barot

            Calling Wilde & Coward & Mencken:

            A worthy successor emerges.

            So, you’re keeping an eye on me, Tovarich? Are we filing it away for the day when the Black Marias can take us aways? Or is it more banal, such as calling the $PLC?

            1. Question sanity;
            2. Threaten social ostracism; and,
            3. Threaten livelihood.

            (I just recited these Soviet-style American Left tactics above). What stage are you on?

            Please not that I naively believe in a free & fair discussion where my questions precipitated by pattern observation merit a response.

            Please don’t ever complain of “Left Wing Bias” or “Silencing” by “The Cathedral” since you are cut from the same cloth.

            And, yes, I know the origins of “thug.” However, we neither created nor administered a “secret police” that destroyed over 40 million lives.

            I urge you to read a Wiki on “irony.” Your grap on this (admittedly) confusing concept is tenuous, at best.

          • BenZacharia

            So reading what you, as well as others, publish is ‘keeping on eye on you’? What matchbook law school did you matriculated you? Don’t answer, I will not believe what you claim. As for the Kaliforna BAR, they’ll admit anyone.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            You are a victim in your own paranoid delusion schizo damaged “mind”.

        • A Z

          Sorry, David Duke does not represent Republican or America. He has been denounced. You really do not see terrorists in the Middle East denounced. Instead they are praised. Ipso facto they do represent Islam.

          “In 1992 Duke ran for the nomination. Republican Party officials tried to block his participation”

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Duke

          Atzmon. I had to look him or her up. I don’t see Gilad as having much support in America. I daresay Gilad would have more support in terms of numbers and percentage of the population in the Muslim world. Did you really want to walk that dog (of an ideal)?

          http://socialistunity.com/gilad-atzmon-–-now-an-open-holocaust-denier/

          MacDonald is too common of a name to try to look up. But having now been to Auster’s blog I assume you mean Heather MacDonald

          I have not heard of Larry Auster. iSteve and several other have. Larry Auster has been described as a nationalist. He had a lot to say about immigration and all the usual issues. Being married to a nonwhite immigrant I do not think I would have any problems with him. The problem must be in you conception of reality and not mine. You should get you head right.

          • Aditya Vivek Barot

            If all you have we soviet tropes which involve questioning my sanity for imputing less than noble motives to a group of men who are only mortals and, thus, capable of evil and stupidity, there is nothing that can help you.

            In the context that I used it, I was referring to Kevin MacDonald, a man universally reviled by all “right thinking” people, and one that I am very ambivalent about.

            Gilad Atzmon is a jazz musician and notorious J*w hater darling of the nationalist socialist set (a bunch more repulsive than all the commentators here).

            You don’t know what you’re talking about. You really need to read more and try to think. Use your mind, recognize patterns, and try to figure out why such patterns exist.

            That’s the scientific method.

            Much better than flinging poo from your mental cage.

          • A Z

            Aditya,

            I misread your post. I owe you an apology. I’m sorry.

            By the sultan you meant the sultanknish.

            I should have known by your name how to read what you wrote.

            All of my post stands on the David Duke and Gila Atzman.
            However as I read your post azz-backwards, I should not have wrote.

            “Did you really want to walk that dog (of an ideal)?”

            My apologies

          • laura r

            you can now edit that post for clarity by removing it. go to edit then erase the whole thing, add some xxx’s then post. the readers will not see it, there will be no confusion.

          • A Z

            I’d rather apologize and makes sure Aditya remains a reader, if I made the mistake. Sure it is egg on my face, but I’ll live. I am bullish on ESL teachers.

          • laura r

            david duke is very manipulative, & sneaky. he caters to low info whites. his target now is focused on jews. he speaks so slow, & i know all of the tricks. give “some” truthful information, then come to an untrue conclusion. hes a marginal no body. he could have hired a better plastic surgeon. he looks like michael jackson meets joan rivers. what a tacky old queen. hes become his own worst nightmare.

          • A Z

            When I 1st read Aditya’s post I thought he was blaming social conservative types and Tea party for the likes of David Duke. I took offense to it and also showed where the RNC disowned David Duke. He won election 1 time for 2 years and then he was out on his butt.

            Aditya’s English is quite good, but IMO he still mangled his message on his 1st post.

            Aditya is a lawyer and looks like he is well read. I don’t get all of his references so I’ll have to play catch up. He is hard on some people that he should not be, but you already have that covered are better read about those people than I.

            I don’t think much about David duke. He is a non-entity. If he ever popped up on the news, I would tell my kids he is a bad man and to avoid him. That is pretty much it. i would have to tell one of them to not to worry about him, but just give David Duke some more rope and let him hang himself. It is more fun to watch instead of getting worked up.

          • laura r

            go to you tube. there are lectures by kevin mac donald, quite good. there is much truth in what he says. it needs to be tweaked a bit here & there. you can hear david dukes vid, shut him off after a minute. both duke & mac donald blame jews for multi culturalism. its only part true, as regular people are not responsible for the dealings of soros, or the communist leaders 100 yrs back & current. listening to mac donald gave me insight reasons why jews have a bad reputation. politics, hollywood, wall st. yes there are a disproportionate number of jews up there. borat wants to have an honest conversation about this, but tends to think that it is discouraged on this forum.

          • A Z

            His surname is Barot. You mistyped as Borat. Read as Borat and my mine was spinning so fast as to not make sense of anything!

            Jews being in finance is not an unexpected result. As European governments and kingdoms forbade them to practice agriculture that left them no choice to be merchants, tradesmen or bankers. They we not allowed in government either. So the occupations in which over 90% of people worked were not open to them. So it is not so much a conspiracy as something to be expected. I still fully have to read up on the Hep Hep riots. The name is bizarre sounding. that alone should make an impression on people,. This should help them not forget what the laws were back in the day.

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hep-Hep_riots

            Michael Medved has listed the Jewish film producers during Hollywood’s early day and now. He has shot down that conspiracy. That particular ‘lecture’ should be a you tube video or podcast. linked in several places.

          • laura r

            i know the history, why jews started the $ lending field. also why they went to hollywood or started it. since i know this, i have a good defence for them. as for the hep hep riots, there was always attacks against jews in europe. but lets face it, communism didnt help matters. (the head honchos were all jewish). the wall st people are corrupt, hollywood is so disgusting, throw the multi culti master puppets, its not a good image. i am not blaming the jewish people. its just bad luck that so many high rollers are jews who are up to no good. i will check out the list for hollywood producers from silent films to present.

          • A Z

            I would expect marginalized Jewish people to be overrepresented in social movements that were anti normative. The Jews were not allowed to be part of the system.

            With good education i would not expect it to be the case now. Soros for example is well educated. He may be miseducated but he has had the opportunity to be well educated.

            People do not see Horowitz, Medved or Daniel Greenfield. they see Medea Benjamin , Larry David and Soros.

            They do not see Norm Coleman. they see all the Senate Democrats.

          • defcon 4

            Jack Warner was not Jewish.

          • laura r

            checking this out, will get back to you. i wonder, what % of the film tv industry is jewish? jews in hollywood say they run things, they are majority.

          • defcon 4

            I’m wrong, completely wrong. So there’s no reason to check.

          • laura r

            kevin mac donald is a fine academic. he is correct about 85% of the time, @ least w/the lectures i heard. he may come to some IN correct conclusions @ times. he does know jewish history & their involvement w/the far left. his info did help me understand anti semitism. (also gave me the information to defend jews as well). i know who altzman the jazz musican is, not a favorite.

          • Aditya Vivek Barot

            Atzman is a piece of sh*t. The man is a caricature of the J*w hater.

            MacDonald’s research is iron-clad. I like his writing style, too. That’s why I’m a TOQ subscriber.

            I do have many reservations about his “evolutionary psychology” theory because of a wealth of contradictory information.

            You don’t have to go too far. Read Joseph Roth, especially his reports from the crumbling Austro-Hungarian Empire and his superb “Emperor” novels. You will learn that most German Jews were what we would call ultra-right and very Conservative. They despised Zionism because it was, at that time, a left-wing enterprise.

            Of course, the Jewish communities in the Ottoman territories and other Muslim and non-Christian lands were as “reactionary” as imaginable. Indian Jews, for instance, have assimilated to thoroughly, and are so Nationalistic, that they are almost Jingoistic!

            That’s why I take MacDonald’s theory with a grain of salt. What is undeniable is that he does expose disproportionate Jewish involvement in Left wingery and further demonstrates how that was totally compatible with a Jewish identity as opposed to the lie regularly repeated by Communist Apologists that Trotsky, Kamanev, Kaganov, Frankl, and other Jewish Communists stopped being Jewish and were oppressors of their people. Such rubbish!

            The problem is that we cannot have an honest discussion about J*ws. Every book is a sickeningly slavish paean to their tenacity (which is fabulous) and a form of self-flagellation (for crimes real and imagined, which were committed against many other nations).

            That’s why all discussion is either within the reptile community or in such esoteric and boring jargon that ordinary people cannot access or understand it in any manner shape or form.

          • laura r

            i am aware of the differences between european jews. i grew up hearing the insults between family members. i wouldnt mind corresponding w/mac donald but not sure if he is involved his comment section. i used to read “occidental review”. there are some really intelligent reasonable white nationalists. also depisible “regulars”- site is not moderated. as i recall it did not use disques. if you commented on an artical which was not current, no one would see it. (even if it was from the prior issue). it is true that the very left wing jews were not that connected to their hertiage, mac donald is correct. gentiles hijacked the comminust movement. it is correct to say that many top dogs are jewish like george soros etc. then you have the marxists like barbara spectre. i find them irrehensible. about assimilation, many europeans did not for a long time- now it’s changing. so macdonald is correct about that as well. he was speaking about the majority of jews in the US. i dont know if he mentions indians.

          • A Z

            Do you mean irreprehensible and not irrehensible?

            “then you have the Marxists like Barbara Spectre. I find them irrehensible. about assimilation, many Europeans did not for a long time- now it’s changing. So Macdonald is correct about that as well.”

            I am not up on MacDonald’s writings. I lost the meaning of the comments. Who is or is not assimilating or who does or does not wan them to assimilate?

          • defcon 4

            Really who cares? In the 21st century, it’s not Jews who are engaged in a worldwide campaign of ethnic cleansing, terrorism and persecution of the unbeliever and Israel is the only free, democratic oasis in the middle of the islam0nazi desert that the rest of the Mid-East and N. Africa are.

      • A Z

        I’m sure there is.

        The book “The Silent Brotherhood’ relates a story about an American aeronautical engineer who resided in India for business. He learned about the caste system and how miscegenation made the Aryan’s weak. He came back to America an avowed racist.

    • Hassan

      Daniel Greenfield is just the exception that confirms the rule.

      • WhiteHunter

        Is your first name “Nidal,” your former profession “psychiatrist,” and your former rank in the U.S. Army “Major,” Hassan?

        Just guessing.

      • SCREW SOCIALISM

        Hasshat is just the run of the mill moron.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      Are leftists from your background “your people”?

      Hollywood’s portrayals of Jews are rife with the typical self-loathing of leftists. The number of Jewish role models in modern films can be counted on one hand.

      • Aditya Vivek Barot

        Yes; my people, at least 80%, should be deported en masse.

        Indians have no respect for America or its historic majority. They suffer from an inferiority-superiority complex that is as wide as it is deep. They have no interest in assimilation and as soon as they make enough money return to the homeland.

        Whereas your community has built the finest schools, unies, hospitals and other institutions of philanthropy, Hindus have contributed nothing. They are total parasites who have no business being here.

        Mass immigration through chain immigration from India is a monumentally stupid idea because we get the most corrupt and hypocritical nations coming over to take advantage of the nicest people on earth.

        So, yes, Indians, especially “educated” types like the Pinko mayor of Seattle, are a clear and present danger to the continued prosperity and security of the U.S. and most them should be deported. ASAP.

        • Daniel Greenfield

          I would like to think there’s a little more hope for Asians than that

    • defcon 4

      Your entire delusional rant can be summarized in three words: It’s the Jews.

      • Aditya Vivek Barot

        A fave Soviet tactic: don’t respond the merits of your opponents’ argument; question their sanity. Threaten Social Ostracisation. Move on to threatening livelihood. The $PCL and ADL are really good these tactics.

        Thank you everyone who has viciously attacked me for vindicating every allegation I made. You’ve been a lovely audience.

      • Aditya Vivek Barot

        http://articles.latimes.com/2008/dec/19/opinion/oe-stein19

        This is evidence. That the world finest propaganda machine is dominated by a handful of nepotistic MoTs is undeniable.

        Since this website criticizes Muslims for Muslim behavior, why can’t we, a la Larry Auster, criticize MoTs for being MoTs. Does their background play no part in their Leftist activism? When Weinstein says he wants to destroy the NRA or when Larry David urinates on a portrait of Jesus, am I to believe that there is no ethnic motivation?

        This blog doesn’t shy from imputing non-PC motives to Muslims. I have no love lost for them. Simultaneously, I am forced to agree with the magnificent and much missed Larry Auster that the Tribe fears and loathes the historical American majority more than Muslims for reasons that I simply cannot understand.

        Obviously, free and unfettered discourse is not what people seek here. All you want is validation of your prejudices and the destruction of anyone who disagrees with you.

        • Daniel Greenfield

          You may want to read everything Larry Auster wrote, not just the stuff you find convenient for your argument.

          • Aditya Vivek Barot

            I’ve tried (and still am) to read and understand his mind-boggling output.

            Larry (RIP) was the first in fight to attack J*w Haters. I’m not a J*w Hater. However, I don’t believe they are G-D’s gift to hunanity, and I criticize them like I do any other group. Isn’t that way Ze’ev Jabotinsky would have wanted?

            Why can’t I discuss the ethnic component underlying activism for some of the most rabidly anti-American and anti-Western movements in the world.

            We don’t shy from discussing the motives of Jihadis and blacks when it comes to nation destroying movements. How is my approach any different?

            The second anyone expresses anything other than unmitigated and slavish admiration of the Tribe, one is labelled an anti-Semite. Larry himself was called one. So was Kissinger and Nixon. Nixon, at least, did more than any other president for Israel including the beatified Reagan.

            This is why I refuse to debate anyone from this community. They cannot handle even the mildest criticism and react ferociously and thuggishly, attacking the critic’s sanity, social life, and livelihood, justifying every stereotype, and making it impossible to sympathize or even like the community.

            If I had a dollar for every time a left wing secular person of the tribe had called me a N— for nothing more than expressing a preference for border control and some attempt to stabilize our demography (and other commonsensical measures), I could retire comfortably.

            I’m sick and tired of being bullied in this fashion. Every semi-literate commentator has set out to prove who can send me off to gulag sooner for asking whether hollywood’s ethnic character may be responsible for its leftism.

            Clearly, nobody in America likes free speech. Front page, which kicked Larry Auster out, is no different than national review in cravenness.

          • Daniel Greenfield

            The problem is that you’re assuming that it’s an ethnic, rather than a post-ethnic component. The Jewish left is hostile to Jewish issues in the same way that their WASP counterparts are to their roots and interests.

            I could hardly sum it up better than Debbie Wasserman Schultz who could not provide a single reason for Jews to vote for Obama except abortion.

            http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/07/15/Debbie-Wasserman-Schultz-Cannot-Name-a-Reason-for-Jews-to-Back-Obama-Except-Abortion

          • Aditya Vivek Barot

            Mr. G.:

            ” One swallow doth not a summer make.” But 69% of the Swallow population voting for B. Hussein makes them Leftists.

            http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/22/jewish-voters-favor-obama_n_1905002.html

            http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/07/jewish-voter-exit-polls_n_2084008.html

            http://www.jpost.com/The-US-Presidential-race/Jewish-support-for-Obama-slipped-but-still-strong

            Leftism defines the J*wish community in America. I have been to Orthodox schuls and I have been to (shudder) Reform and Conservative Schuls. With the exception of the Orthodox, the rest are all doctrinaire Leftists. No different from the World Socialist Forum or the Episcopalian Church.

            Israel isn’t as important to American J*ws as leftism. Abortion is more important that. J*ws are so paranoid, and they so despise the goyim, that 72% of J*ws think that the goyim discriminate against the very people who are busy killing J*ews world-wide and who restarted the Forever War that Tuesday Morning in New York when there is absolutely no evidence of any such discrimination.

            “Tellingly, Jews sound a lot more like a minority when it comes to discrimination than one might expect from a group of people who are mostly white. Despite problems between Israel and its Arab (and Persian) neighbors, 72% of Jews say Muslims in America are discriminated against, versus just 47% of the public at large who say that. While 64% of Jews say there is discrimination against African Americans, only 47% of all Americans do. This gap extends to attitudes towards Latino Americans, as well.”

            http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/02/jewish-americans-vote-democratic

            If this isn’t irrational hate and paranoia, I don’t know what is.

            I don’t associate with Indians. I have no Indian friends. The few I have are all very, very Right-Wing Orthodox Jews who don’t threaten my life and livelihood when I criticize the J*wish Community.

            Similarly, I see no reason to associate with, or like, or even respect, most J*ws since they are, evidently, committed to destroying the very reason I immigrated to the United States.

            Larry analyzed the hatred and paranoia of the Tribe in these very pages until your illustrious Editor & Publisher banished him for you know why.

            http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=12534

            This is an ethnic problem, whether you want to admit it not. Watch the “Hebrew Hammer” for further proof of the J*wish fantasy of working with non-whites to attack white Gentiles. It’s a wonderful insight into the mind of the 69% who voted for Hussein.

            When high-achieving J*ews,. Indians, Asians vote alongside with Blacks, they are all united by one thing and one thing only: racial hatred for Gentile whites.

            Fact of the matter is that there is a very significant proportion of the Tribe that despises the goyim, and given goyim cowardice and slavishness, they should.

            So, yes, to paraphrase Disraeli, ethnicity is all, and all is ethnicity,

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Hey Moron, Taking your idiotic comment to its conclusion, ALL the people who voted for Obama are leftists.

            Why would you leave out all the others and just focus on Jews?

            The people who identify with anyone named “Hussein”, Bill Ayers, Reid, Moore, MSNBC, Rosie O’Donnel, Whoopie, CAIR, OPEC, Pelosi, et al. are ignored by you.

          • Aditya Vivek Barot

            F*ctard:

            I did mention other groups including my own. Read my prior response; Chekist scum.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Piglet,

            Lower your pinhead when you speak to your betters.

            Again, please FOAD.

          • Aditya Vivek Barot

            It was a long-ish response to the Sultan. Perhaps, you lack the intellect and attention span for going thru the whole post.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Autistic Vivet Bardot,

            You should genuflect to the Sultan. Now please FOAD.

          • Aditya Vivek Barot

            Descendent of Apes and Pigs:

            I appreciate your understanding of your station in life: you don’t have the guts to show your vile and sallow face to your betters. Good little untermensch.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Piglet,

            Go swallow your bottle of sleeping pills and wash it down with a bottle of whiskey.

            Dream a little dream of eternal nakba.

          • Aditya Vivek Barot

            You ignorant Swine:

            Do you know that I am a Zionist? Do you know that I am a Hindu? Do you have the capacity to distinguish between the two?

            I am an Arya Samaji- a Hindu sect that encapsulates the highest and most noble Vedic-Aryan philosophy.

            I am a regular donor to the VFW and the IDF. I failed my US army physical and my immigration status prevented me from working in Iraq though I applied everywhere.

            Who are you, untermensch? What are you except a fanatic etho-supremacist? You are a cowardly dissimulator like the rest of your degenerate ilk. Fortunately, EY puts people like you in their proper place (scrubbing toilets used by your superiors).

            Someday, we’ll have you doing that in the projects, and I will personally lash your a** as you’re on your hands and knees scrubbing STD infested loos.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Piglet,

            Knock yourself out writing your drivel.

            Here is a glimpse of your past and your future.

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-O8_L7ExrE

            Happy Eternal Nakba piglet!

          • Aditya Vivek Barot

            OMG! You’re hilarious. Are you actually one the ChosenTM?

            Well, if so, you have a future, And so does the cockroach.

            ” A lily of a day
            Is fairer far in May,
            Although it fall and die that night;
            It was the plant and flower of light.
            In small proportions we just beauties see;
            And in short measures, life may perfect be.”

            This is something your rat-race will never comprehend.

            You may now return to counting your geld and eating babies.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Ignorant Piglet,

            You too have been Chosen.

            But in your case, you have been chosen for humiliation, defeat, devastation and ultimately unconditional surrender.

            Even your comrades in Syria are busy slaughtering each other. Please join them in their fun.

            Happy Eternal Nakba piglet!

          • defcon 4

            It’s interesting that your diatribes and insults are reserved for Jews — considering what islam0nazis are doing in the Indian sub-continent to Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists and anyone else non-muslim.

          • Daniel Greenfield

            You’re speaking largely about a Jewish secular left that is vanishing generation by generation.

            The Jewish vote for the left is in decline. Demographics means the left is slowly becoming extinct. Some of those numbers are already showing up in New York where the Jewish vote in quite a few areas trended toward Romney.

            The Conservative movement is expected to vanish within two decades.

            As for the Hebrew Hammer, amusingly enough, its star would not even be recognized as Jewish by Orthodox Jews.

            And its total box office take, $82,000. A very influential movie indeed.

      • BenZacharia

        Be joyful that AVB di not excoriate you for the technicallity that ‘it’s a contraction, that counts as two words.

        • defcon 4

          Yet it only appears once in the dictionary.

  • Moa

    Don’t forget, the Serbians were fighting the jihadis of the Bosnia and later the Albanian jihadis of the KLA. Yes, in the Balkans no-one is a good guy, but this was an instance where the USA used its airpower to advance the jihadi agenda. That was the big take-away lesson to Islamists, “cry victim and the US will advance your agenda with airpower” – provided a Democrat President is enthroned at the time, of course..

    • Hassan

      “There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That’s a 19th century idea and we are trying to transition into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states.” – Gen. Wesley Kanne Clark.

      Well, that was the Chosen”(TM) supreme commander of the NATO forces in Kosovo stated to the CNN. NATO did not bomb the Serbs to help Muslims, but to defend multiculturalism and its Jewish masters.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        PC multiculturalism isn’t an outgrowth of Judaism you Muslim moron. Instead it evolved out of Marxism, which is a mental disease that manifest throughout the Left.

        • Hassan

          Judaism, Marxism and capitalism are the “greatest” Jewish inventions in history.

          • defcon 4

            Wow, Judaism is a Jewish invention eh? Really deep hassan. Capitalism and Marxism as well eh? Capitalism was invented then. I guess this must be what passes for intelligent thought in the universities and colleges of islamic states.

          • Hassan

            Anything wrong with what I just wrote?

          • Daniel Greenfield

            Just everything

          • Hassan

            Nonsense.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Which sura or hadith are you referring to?

          • iluvisrael

            What’s wrong is the inbreeding that makes you muzzies so nuts

          • the Buffoon

            Ya’ think? Can you email it to me?

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            hassassin, Please FOAD like your prophet of Satan called Muhammed.

          • defcon 4

            Hassassin, another gem.

          • WhiteHunter

            Yeah. What you wrote, and the fact that you wrote it. That’s all.

        • Steve Bryant

          Interesting that the only culture that doesn’t deserve inclusion is the American culture, eh?
          “Multiculturalism” has ruined the US educational system and now has our financial system in its sights. But hey, even though we will be in a pig sty, we’ll all be “equal”

          • defcon 4

            We won’t be equal if the scuzzlums have anything to say about it.

      • Daniel Greenfield

        That must explain the constant US pressure on Israel to turn over territory to Muslim terrorists.

        • Hassan

          Red herring.

          • Gee

            Just a minor fact – but racists like you hate those

          • Hassan

            Funny how the country of slaves in chains, the Ku-Klux Klan and racial segregation until the 1960s suddenly wants to take the moral high ground in this area.

            Muslims live in peace with all ethnic groups.

          • Gee

            Muslims still have slavery – most telling. They only live in ‘peace’ with subjugated ethnic groups.

            Until the Muslim rape, murder and convert enough of the ethnic groups then they are oh so peaceful – just as the Syrians how peaceful

          • Hassan

            Slavery is pre-Islamic, and has thus nothing to do with Islam.

          • Daniel Greenfield

            That explains Mohammed’s slaves… which had nothing to do with him.

          • Hassan

            Like I wrote, it is pre-Islamic. There were slaves in America until the 1860s, but that doesn’t mean it had anything to do with Christianity either.

          • Daniel Greenfield

            So you’re saying Mohammed was behaving badly by keeping slaves?

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Slavery continues TODAY in Sudan and Mauritania.

            Miuslims in Africa captured blacks and sold them to Europeans.

          • defcon 4

            Well they certainly wanted nothing to do with him and I’m sure there were many other people who felt the same way but had no choice in the matter.

          • Steve Bryant

            As in know n-o-t-h-i-n-g? Right, Shultz.

          • Paul of Alexandria

            “Slavery is pre-Islamic”. True, and Irrelevant. See above.

          • laura r

            hassan, are you a real arab? or just a college kid from vermont?

          • Cajun Wbmc

            Tell that to the Christians that are being persecuted and murdered in all those “muslim” countries…
            BTW, you’ve got a bit of muhammed in the corner of your mouth…better wipe that off….

          • Hassan

            There is no persecution of Christians. The Jews are trying to alienate us. Don’t believe the Jewish media manipulators. We have coexisted peacefully with Christians for many centuries.

          • Cajun Wbmc

            EEENCK, WRONG!

            Hassan, your bomb maker called…said your vest alterations are done and ready to be fitted!

          • Hassan

            Your dog called. He wanted to know why he was tied up all day while your daughter was allowed to run wild.

          • iluvisrael

            your goat called – she’s knocked up!

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Soon hassan will have a new brother/sister.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Your rabid dog called “prophet muhammed (Piss Be Upon Him)” is running wild and needs to be picked up by the ASCPA.

          • defcon 4

            But muhammad forbid the ownership of dogs! Why do you propose such a heretical idea?

          • Drakken

            I think your goat is all worn out from your attentions Haji.

          • defcon 4

            Your wife called, she had her first menses.

          • defcon 4

            LOL, you’re either very dumb, or very arrogant or some combination of the two to believe that damn, dumb lie will fly here.

          • Aditya Vivek Barot

            Look man, this is outright dissimulation. Pathetic dissimulation.

            Muslims don’t even live in peace with other Muslims. Ask the Ismailis of Pakistan about Muslim tolerance.

            Also, take an ESL class. Your English is pathetic.

          • Hassan

            Where are you from? India? We’ll wash our feet in the Indian ocean soon enough, and your smug pride will be broken. We’ll simply take back what is ours.

          • Aditya Vivek Barot

            Dude, washing your feet will ipso facto be a tremendous improvement.

            Come down to Gujarat. I’ll introduce you to Mr. Narendra Modi. He knows what to do with your kind.

            You malechhas (untermenschen) are incapable of anything other than buggering little boys and farm animals.

            A nation of refugees that escaped from Hitler’s ovens destroyed you, and they continue to humiliate you.

            You are the poster-boys for the “EPIC FAIL” movement.

            Come at me, Muzzie. Come down to Ahmedabad. We’ll show you a good time.

          • Hassan

            We wash our feet five times a day, dirty little man. If you read our history, you will see that we know how to deal with polytheists.

            In a few decades there will be a Muslim majority in Russia. We will use their nuclear weapons to eradicate polytheism once and for all.

          • Aditya Vivek Barot

            It’s so weird they you and your mum both call me “dirty little man.” Of course, your mum was screaming that out loud as I gave her some uncircumcised lovin’ (but, of course, you know all about that, right?)

            Listen, boy, first of all, show your camel-cunny eating face. As you can see, I have the guts to use my “IRL” ID.

            We expect nothing but violence and rape, but only against the weak, from followers of a kiddie rapist, pirate, highway robber, and all-round bad-fella-heen.

            Where was your bravery against the Mongols when they raped your precious Caliphate and ensured that Baghdad would remain a backwater in perpetuity.

            You sick little f***s can’t stand up to anyone with any guts. You are hyenas, attacking the weak. That’s why your kind rapes teenage drug addicts because most adult white women will castrate you.

            Come down to Gujarat or, at least, do some research. We love your people and your prophet (may p*ss and sh*t be upon him) and we host regular barbecues for all adherents of the religion of camel p*iss.

            Also, seriously, an ESL class won’t hurt. It’ll help you in the cabbie business since it is a good idea to actually understand directions and to read road signs and all that. You don’t want them to pull your can driver license, right? Oh, my bad! You’re a Muzzie! Licenses are for Kafirs. We just roll, and if you have a problem, watch me pull this chord!

            Oh, Hassan, what hijinks must you and your wannabe sleeper cell buddies be up to! Getting rejected by every white woman including the 300lbs cow with udders made of beef jerky; wondering whether to choke the chicken or rape your sister or the dog, being unable to tell the difference…..

            Hey, pitch it to Tosh. Or to Yucko. They dig this sick sh*t. You might actually mak some honest money!

          • Hassan

            Thank you for putting the sick mind of a polytheist on display. Gujarat and the rest of your miserable country will be fertile soil for glowing mushrooms soon enough.

            الله أكبر

          • defcon 4

            As long as your wait for the “sacred months to pass first” right Hassan Chop?

          • defcon 4

            But Hassan, didn’t you write: “Muslims live in peace with all ethnic groups”? Or was Sathan urinating in your ear when you wrote that?

          • Hassan

            Polytheism is hardly an ethnic group.

          • SylerCitySol

            Your prepuce called, it’s wants to know why you abandoned it.

          • defcon 4

            I hope the Hindus take back what is rightfully theirs in the Indian sub-continent and make up for centuries of persecution and genocide committed on them by the islam0nazi slaves of allah.

          • defcon 4

            Hassan CHOP!

          • guest

            Your comment proves once again that the average Muslim lives in a state of permanent self-delusion. They lie into their own (forget about our’s) pockets for the sake of … what? So sad, man, wake up .. and look reality in the eye if you’ve got any brains and guts.

          • Daniel Greenfield

            Name one religion that Muslims live in peace with. It can even be a variant of Islam, like Shiites.

          • iluvisrael

            tell that to the victims of the Nairobi mall massacre

          • TinyElvis

            And pigs can fly, and babies are brought by storks, and breaking a mirror is 7 years bad luck!

          • defcon 4

            And muhahahahaMAD flew to the Temple Mount on a flying donkey in one night from Saudi Arabia (that must’ve been one fast donkey), then ascended to heaven and came back (I guess the virgins weren’t to his liking).

          • the Buffoon

            Muslims live in peace with all ethnic groups.

            So it is true. Frontpagemag.com is a front for the Onion.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            “Muslims live in peace with all ethnic groups.”

            LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL!

          • Softly Bob

            Just because you say so, don’t make it so.

          • defcon 4

            Gee, which countries practice legalized slavery today slave of allah? The islamic states. Mauritania and the Sudan. Thanks for playing, you are the weakest link.

          • Paul of Alexandria

            Funny – American slave traders didn’t capture slaves themselves; they bought them from the Muslim slave traders, who had been there for hundreds of years before any Europeans showed up. Oh, and slavery is still legal in most Islamic countries, especially sex-slavery. The Christians outlawed it over a hundred years ago (go and watch the movie “Amazing Grace” about William Wilberforce and the English anti-slavery movement, sometime). As for Muslims “living in peace”, tell that to the Coptic Christians in Egypt sometime.

          • laura r

            since when? im not up on history.

          • Boogie’s Daddy

            Ah, yes the past…..The only open slave trade now exists where it began: in Islamic nations. The KKK, a Southern Democrat periah no longer funtions in the light and segregation is so far behind us that we have a black&white president.
            America has truly gone through many changes. Islam has not. Islam still kills anyone who doesn’t submit and anyone who gets in the way of them killing anyone who doesn’t submit..
            Thus, even with it’s short, troubled, past America does occupy the higher ground. By default, perhaps, but it’s there none the less.

          • Omar

            You want to get down and dirty with propaganda? Fine. Sure America had flaws, but we had, for the large part, corrected those flaws with key anti-slavery, citizenship, civil and voting rights legislation passed in Congress and signed by many different presidents over the course of almost two centuries. You want to talk about slavery? Talk about modern slavery in certain African countries. Talk about slavery in certain Islamist countries. Talk about how in Sudan, black African Christians were (and still are being) slaughtered in a campaign of genocide by the racist, Islamist supremacist Arab military dictatorship in that country. You want to talk about racial segregation? Talk about how white farmers in Zimbabwe are facing racial discrimination at the hands of the black supremacist, Marxist dictatorship of Robert Mugabe. Mugabe’s dictatorship steals land from white farmers and gives it to his Marxist cronies. Why don’t you criticize the regimes that I mentioned instead of democratic America?

          • Drakken

            Where is a Serb when you really need one.

          • Melnik

            Funny how Muslims have no idea of their own history regarding slavery. You guys practically invented it.

          • defcon 4

            I’m more interested in the fact they still practice it. I read an advertisement, in Soddy Barbaria for a black, eunuch, muslime slave for sale. I’m not sure if was legit or not, but I do know SOddy Barbaria was still having public slave auctions in the 1960′s.

          • Drakken

            Haji isn’t a racist, he just wants you Jews dead, by whatever means, I say eff the effing effers. Sooner or later we are going to learn that to leave these savages breathing is a mistake.

          • iluvisrael

            your taqiya is showing accchhhmed!

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Red/Green Axis of Evil.

          • defcon 4

            No, it’s not. If NATO members are beholden to their
            “Jewish masters”, then why do the most important members of NATO always pressure Israel to turn over territory to Muslim terrorists?

      • Cajun Wbmc

        Quoting the idiot wesley clark is not the smartest move…he’s the same guy who was drinking shots with the serbian asshole who was doing his level best to send your islamic brothers to meet their virgins…

        • Drakken

          Weasly Clark was the same asshole who was trying to stop the Serbs from taking care of business. He was a friend of the muslims, not Serbs.

      • Steve Bryant

        Perspective trumps facts for Hassan. I’m waiting for the day when liberals help the poor oppressed Muslims to form a government in a Western country. Then, we can all have a brief chuckle as they are all beheaded.

    • Lightbringer

      The Serbs have been fighting Moose-limbs for half a millennium, with mixed results. They deserved America’s support in the ’90′s, not its ordinance raining down on them.

  • johnlac

    I don’t know….I think those Dutch are still a huge terrorist threat. Just think of all that Dutch chocolate that has made America’s youth fat and indolent. Think of all those innocent American dopers who travel to Amsterdam to get stoned. Just an innocent ploy by the Dutch government to get tourist dollars? I think not. The American dopers are obviously being infected with nasty Dutch germs deliberately put into their weed to make them subservient when the Netherlands invades us. I think Hollyweird should make movies depicting the awful truth about these Dutch terrorists who want to conquer the world with their weed and chocolate.

    • darnellecheri

      And…those sinister wooden clogs! An ambitious strategy to deform the feet of their Imperialist enemies.

      • BenZacharia

        You speak more truth than you may know. Those ‘sinister wooden shoes’ aka ‘sabos’ we’re used by Luddite terrorists to disrupt free markets, giving rise to the word ‘sabotage’.
        Just sayin’.

        • darnellecheri

          So close and yet, so far. I’m always spouting out more than I know. Thanks ;)

      • Softly Bob

        Yes, and we all know how Muslims love to throw shoes at their enemies as a form of insult.
        Dutch Muslims are dangerous clog-throwers with enough skill to shame even the craziest of Austin Powers’ villains.

    • Joe

      To take back New Amsterdam (New York) that is the plan

    • Daniel Greenfield

      Just read the Protocols of the Elders of the Netherlands.

  • Consider

    I remember having watched a movie starring Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jamie Lee Curtiss , something involving a VTOL Harrier aircraft, where all the villains were Moslems, set to detonate a nuclear warhead stolen in Russia…

    • tagalog

      Yes, True Lies, made in 1994, twenty years ago and 7 years before the Muslim attack on 9/11.
      Then it was OK to make jihadists the bad guys; they hadn’t yet made a devastating attack against us on U.S. soil.

    • defcon 4

      Ugh, what a bad movie that was too. Even more surprising to me is that an old Chuck Norris movie about the hijacking of a an airliner by muslimes turned out to have an element of truth to it, because muslimes did beat a Navy diver to death in a similar plane hijacking by muslimes.

      • tagalog

        Delta Force was made not long after the skyjacking you mention, and the beating of the Navy sailor was intentionally based on a factual incident. The idea was to make the movie appear timely.

  • http://libertyandculture.blogspot.com/ Jason P

    My wife loves to watch TV crime shows. After 9/11, we started to notice this pattern, too. Ten years ago, the biggest villain was “the Russian Mob.” Serbians would do but as you note, the end of the Cold War made the Russians suitable for being the bad guys.

    Often the show would have a Muslim subject early on. But this was inserted to tempt the audience. As the show progressed the real villain was the “Russian Mob.” The whole purpose of the Muslim subject was to trap the audience into “prejudice” and make them feel guilty for their “bigotry.”

    Having a hate-filled jiahadi just won’t do. The rare exception is Homeland. But even here Brady has to be shown to have good reason to have joined the jiahdi. “Collateral damage” motivates him to turn on his country and work for the villain who deliberately targets civilians! When push comes to shove, they do show the lead jiahdi to be more interested in killing than the cause. But even here that makes him out to be just a psychopath “disguised in Islam.” Still, the shows is hated by CAIR and that says something.

    • darnellecheri

      “Law & Order” (L&O) came close to portraying a terrorist as a terrorist, but as the plot unfolded, the nasty crimes were perpetrated by a crazy, racist Anglo American. To attribute credit, however, L&O showcased the barbaric honor killings done in the name of, well, you know what.

      • http://libertyandculture.blogspot.com/ Jason P

        Yes, that rare honor killing is allowed and it show the old liberal sensibilities aren’t completely gone. Let’s give ‘em credit and continue to point to Islam’s barbaric anti-woman (Islam is the real war on women) and anti-gay (hey, Cuomo, did you way Muslims weren’t welcomed in NYC?) ethos.

        • defcon 4

          The old L & O had a story about FGM as well, but they carefully whitewashed away any references to the RoP.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      That’s the exact pattern.

      Muslim attacks are either ‘fake’ and proven to be the work of someone more conventionally American. In the rare cases when they take place, they are shown as the work of extremists and balanced out with a moderate Imam.

    • WhiteHunter

      There are several differences between the Russian ‘Mafia’ and the islamic terrorists: the main one is that Russians want to swindle and rob you, and don’t mind killing you without giving it a second thought, if it takes that. For them, murder is “just business, nothing personal.”

      For the jihadists, in contrast, killing you IS their “business,” and they have no other reason for existing.

    • kikorikid

      “A hate filled jihadist” is a misnomer. The jihadist is fulfilling
      the obligations of DUTY under Quranic proscription.
      I HATE jihadis because they murder indiscrimately any and
      all who do not conform to Islamic Fascism. It is my DUTY
      to fight them for what they have done, what they are doing, and
      what they are planning. All of it is a design to topple our
      Constitution and replace it with Shariah-Hadith. For me,
      there has never been a more clear picture of DUTY.

  • DogmaelJones1

    “If a movie is made about September 11 a decade from, now, the villains will probably be Serbian nationalists.” No, no, you’ve got it wrong, Daniel. The villains will be an alliance of Tea Partiers and gun-clingers and anti-Amnestyiers and anti-Muslimists who underwent plastic surgery to look like Saudis, and the hero(ione) will be a LGBT secret agent who fails to foil the plot because of the “establishment,” played by Justin Bieber.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      That is fairly close to what they’re making already.

    • kikorikid

      WOW! Finally, a safe world!

    • Markus Sarén

      Well, no. Not if it’s about 9/11, you bunch of morons.

      • DogmaelJones1

        Then tell us what it’s about, Mr. Saren. Enlighten us. You and many other people have got to get beyond these snarky, derogatory one-liners and leave a cogent, intelligible comment, even if it goes against the consensus.

        • Markus Sarén

          What do you mean, “tell us what it’s about”? I meant that if a film is about 9/11, then OF COURSE the terrorists are going to be Islamists! That’s all I was trying to get across. Oh, and also the fact that you’re a bunch of morons.

          • Wolfthatknowsall

            Are we morons because we agree with Mr. Greenfield’s thesis about “terrorists” in Hollywood movies, or are we morons because we’re not “gay”. Your profile is showing …

          • Markus Sarén

            Yes to the first one, no to the second one.

          • Wolfthatknowsall

            It seems that you have one of two problems with us (perhaps, both):

            1- You consider us “morons” because we don’t take the leftist side of issues, and/or

            2- You, yourself, are Serbian, and took issue with Mr. Greenfield mentioning the term, “Serbian nationalists”.

            I’ve read Tom Clancy’s book, The Sum of all Fears</i? In the book, the people who assembled the bomb and attempted to detonate it were PLFP terrorists, and the blast was supposed to coincide with an attack on the American embassy in Berlin staged by East Germans disguised as Russians.

            The East Germans hope that the resulting nuclear war will eliminate both Russia and the US, and pave the way for world socialism. The PFLP terrorists hope to end American aid to Israel.

            In the movie, Hollywood turns it all into a plot by a transnational group of Naz!s. No Muslim involvement, at all.

            So, you see, Mr. Greenfield was on-target in charging that Hollywood … at least … eliminated Muslim terrorists in this movie.

            He who cannot see this is, indeed, a moron …

          • Wolfthatknowsall

            In the book, the people who assembled the bomb and attempted to detonate it were PLFP terrorists, and the blast was supposed to coincide with an attack on the American embassy in Berlin staged by East Germans disguised as Russians.

            The East Germans hope that the resulting nuclear war will eliminate both Russia and the US, and pave the way for world socialism. The PFLP terrorists hope to end American aid to Israel.

            In the movie, Hollywood turns it all into a plot by a transnational group of Naz!s. No Muslim involvement, at all.

            So, you see, Mr. Greenfield was on-target in charging that Hollywood … at least … eliminated Muslim terrorists in this movie.

            He who cannot see this is, indeed, a moron …

          • semus

            Are you saying Mr. Greenfield’s column wasn’t accurate? If so that would be a lie. As a Troll you should know straight lying doesn’t work. You reveal too much people recognize a lie and a liar. Stick to ridiculous statements, name calling and laughing.

          • A Z

            You mean yes to the second one. No one can can post as often as do on gay issues and solely (it would seem) on gays issues and not be gay.

          • Markus Sarén

            It is fully possible, actually, if you support gay rights – which I most certainly do.

          • A Z

            I read further in your posts. You are more than a Johny one note. So maybe you are not gay.

            Maybe you should frequent some gay blogs, read up on psychology and get a lot of experience in fields unrelated and then try to tie it all together.

          • Drakken

            Well of course you do, your a liberal progressive with a bleeding heart, how quaint and special.

          • A Z

            LMAO

          • A Z

            LMAO

          • A Z

            You are correct Wolfthatknowsall.

            “It’s not just gay people who are going to watch something gay-themed.” – Markus Sarén

            Markus is hopeful or delusional.

          • DogmaelJones1

            Not necessarily, Mr. Saren. Nicholas Cage starred in a 9/11 movie as a firefighter, and no mention was made in it of Muslims or Islam. So, it’s possible for Hollywood to churn out a movie about 9/11 without mentioning Muslims or Islam or even terrorists. And you’d get your point across if you devoted more words to your point and fewer to name-calling.

          • Markus Sarén

            No duh it didn’t mention it, because it was from the point of view of the 9/11 first responders who had no idea of who had done this or why! Islamism was utterly irrelevant to the film.

            How is that the same as changing the nationality and ideology of the hijackers, like the OP suggested? There is a difference between doing that, and “not mentioning it”, as you said. This is a straw man argument.

            Is that enough “getting my point across” for ya?

          • DogmaelJones1

            That’s what you ought to have said the first time around, sans the name-calling.

          • Drakken

            Shhhhhh junior, the adults are talking, letting you emotionally crippled leftist in on the conversation is always a mistake, because your all about, I feel therefore I am as your policy positions, instead of the cold hard facts, now back to the kiddy table for you boy.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Bitch Slap AKBAR!

          • defcon 4

            Yeah, gee, who would think that muslimes would commit acts of terrorism? When two 757′s crash into both WTC towers on the same day, within an hour of each other, it could all just be coincidence couldn’t it?

          • Ace

            And completely irrelevant to the story line.

          • defcon 4

            The retarded, lieberal moron wrote: “the 9/11 first responders who had no idea of who had done this”. Yeah, no one could’ve guessed could they..

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            And one crash into the Pentagon and one crash in the wilds of Pennsylvania thanks to Airfone on the planes and passengers taking action to thwart the terrorists attack on their fourth target.

          • Lightbringer

            No idea who had done this or why? Am I the only person who, on seeing the second plane plow into the World Trade Center, said, ” Oh, s#*t! Osama bin Laden!” I rather doubt that I was.

          • defcon 4

            No, you must have been the only one, I bet you never realized how godlike your intellect really was did you?

          • http://rau.3littlefoxes.com/ LindaF

            IF there is a film about 9/11? There never will be a major film – if the ethnicity/religion of the attackers is truthful.

            No, they are not morons. However, someone whose witty and brilliant response to a reasoned critique is “you’re a bunch of morons” might be.

            As we say in the South, “Bless your heart!”

          • tagalog

            There will never be a film about 9/11, not only because of the overscrupulousness about Islam but also because the libs refuse to permit the use of the images of the Twin Towers falling and the Pentagon in flames.

        • BagLady

          Seconded

      • Oswald

        Uhm, I think they are being sarcastic Markus

  • MattBracken

    Outstanding, one of your best.

    • DogmaelJones1

      I second the motion. And I’m working on a novel in which the villains are Muslims, and their ideology is Islam. But you can bet Daniel’s essay here won’t appear in Variety or the Hollywood Reporter. Even the film industry’s papers have been coopted by the Left.

      • Paul of Alexandria

        There’s actually a fair amount of good literature out there which doesn’t shrink back from the truth. Tom Clancy (especially “Executive Orders”), John Ringo, Tom Kratman (especially “Caliphate”!), Brad Thor, Vince Flynn. Let us know when yours comes out!

        • DogmaelJones1

          Paul: I’ll have finished by late March, “The Black Stone,” set in 1930 San Francisco, and will announce it on Facebook. But you can get a head start on the series (five titles) with The Chameleon and A Crimson Overture, The Daedalus Conspiracy, The Head of Athena, and China Basin, all on Amazon Books.

  • Paul Austin Murphy

    What about White House Down last year?

    Just reading its synopsis makes me feel sick. The level of propaganda there is so blatant and clear that it sounds like Hollywood has its own version of Berthold Brecht. Did CAIR (America’s Muslim Brotherhood; we have the Muslim Council of Britain in the UK. Gaza has Hamas.) write the script, direct and produce this film.

    That was about a president making peace-deals with Muslim governments? Well, who could that be based on? Actually, Barack Obama goes one further. He supports Islamists groups before they gain power – such as the cannibals in Syria, the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood before it gained power in Egypt and now he’s going to be doing deals with the Taliban. If this man really wants to convince Americans he’s not a Muslim, he really must try harder.

    Have you heard the one about ‘Christian terrorists’ that US Leftists and Muslims trot out? They refer specifically to Timothy McVeigh but also to the
    anti-abortionists in the US. Timothey McVeigh may have been a Christian, but he didn’t commit his act of terrorism for Christianity or with the words of the New Testament on his lips – as Muslims do for Islam and with the words of the Koran on their lips.

    And the anti-abortionists have killed less than ten people since 1993! Can you believe that? Islam claims more lives than that every single day. Indeed Islam in Pakistan alone claims more lives than that every week. Then again, Hope Not Hate is still ranting on about Anders Breivik. If Islam had only one Breivik there wouldn’t be that much of a problem. Problem is, there are thousands of Muslim Breiviks doing jihad for Islam. Thousands! In addition, have the Leftists forgotten the long period of Leftist terrorism which stretched from the 1960s until the 1980s?

    • http://libertyandculture.blogspot.com/ Jason P

      Baader-Meinhof as perpetrators of evil? Not in Hollywood. So we must assume that the left has a soft spot for jihadi. And indeed, they do. There were a few movies before 9/11 about Arab terrorists and airplane hijacking. But after 9/11, the left discovered it had something in common with jiahdi … they share a common enemy. If you haven’t you must read David’s book “Unholy Alliance.” PS, good to read your articles on AT.

      • Paul Austin Murphy

        Yes, that’s true. Before 9/11 Arab terrorists were indeed featured in Hollywood and American films. But that’s the point: they were ARAB terrorists. Islam wasn’t brought into the equation in those days. That won’t work that well any more because the 7/7 bombers in the UK were NOT Arabs. The Madrid and Paris bombers were only partly Arab and the Bali bomber was not an Arab. They were all Muslims, however.

        It’s fair to say that nationalism and Marxism were components of 1960s and 1970s Arab (such as PLO) terrorism. But even then they didn’t bypass Islam. Yasser Arafat joined the Muslim Brotherhood when young and Fatah is a jihadist Arabic term, I think. People say that Arafat tapped into Islam for his own purposes; but that hardly makes sense when you are talking about most Arabs – even then. Even the secular Saddam Hussein implemented aspects of sharia law despite his socialist/Baathist credentials.

        Aren’t there people high in the American establishment who are ex-Leftist terrorists, members of the Weathermen underground and suchlike?

        • Gee

          There is no such thing as a secular Muslim or a radical Muslim.

          In religious matters a person that prays five times a day and believes that every single word of their holy writings are direct from the lips the almighty are considered fundamentalists. These make up various percentage of the adherents of that religion say 5-10%.

          That is not the case in Islam – it is apostasy to believe anything else and over 75% of the Muslims would be judged as fundamentalists.

          • defcon 4

            I don’t think “fundamentalist” is a world that can be ascribed to islam. Because there are no reformed, or conservative mosques, there are no protestant mosques, there is just islam, be it Shia or Sunni.

          • Gee

            Agreed – that was my point. The most moderate Muslim is far more radical than the most extreme of any other religion in the world

          • laura r

            what % of muslims pray 5 times a day? especially in the US.

          • defcon 4

            Is that really relevant? If you believe in the Jew hating, psychopathic, xenophobic death cult called islam, are you a better or worse person just because you do, or don’t raise your buttocks in the air 5 times a day?

          • Gee

            According to all research over 75%

          • laura r

            it must be difficult to find employment outside of a muslim business. thats alot of prayer. perplexed @ the law suit towards a major fashion chain store. a muslim woman was hired for the sales floor. one of the rules was she had to wear the store colors & the fashions. the case was concerning the head scarf. moving on from the clothing issue, i wonder how can you pray when you have customers? it seems absurd to leave the sales floor, go in back, get on your knees, 5xs. i did read that the imans lifted that rule, & one can make up the prayers for later on.

          • Paul Austin Murphy

            I agree; but it won’t help if we don’t distinguish different types of Muslim.

            As far as a Muslim is truly a Muslim, then, by definition, he can’t be secular in any way. Nonetheless, some Muslims are only nominal or tribal Muslims – Muslims only in name.

            There are big differences between Saddam Hussein and the Ayatollah Khomeini, just as there are between Bashar Assad (hardly an Islamist) and the leaders of Hamas.

            These socialist/Baathist, etc. Muslims became so to the extent they became less Islamic. So we can’t deny that some people born into Muslim cultures can’t move away from Islam – even when or if they deny it.

          • Lightbringer

            Funny thing though, that the most secular of them are still murderous lunatics.

        • Wikipedia

          “Fatah is a jihadist Arabic term, I think”, yes, and an interesting one, I just discovered: “The full name of the movement is حركة التحرير الوطني الفلسطيني ḥarakat al-taḥrīr al-waṭanī al-filasṭīnī, meaning the “Palestinian National Liberation Movement”. From this was crafted the reverse acronym Fatḥ (Fatah) meaning “opening”, “conquering”, or “victory”.[9] The word “fatḥ” or “fatah” is used in religious discourse to signify the Islamic expansion in the first centuries of Islamic history –as in Fatḥ al-Sham, the “conquering of the Levant”. “Fatah” also has religious significance in that it is the name of the 48th sura (chapter) of the Qu’ran which, according to major Muslim commentators, details the story of the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah.
          (During the peaceful two years after the Hudaybiyyah treaty, many
          converted to Islam, increasing the strength of the Muslim side. It was
          the breach of this treaty with the Quraish[10] that triggered the conquest of Mecca. This Islamic precedent was cited by Yasser Arafat as justification for his signing the Oslo Accords with Israel.[11][12]“

      • Ace

        Where are Golan and Globus when we need them? Seriously. Chuck Norris starred in one of their movies in which he laid waste to regiments of Muslim terrorist with a jeep-mounted machine gun. OK, perhaps a slight exaggeration but no mistaking who were the bad guys.

        • defcon 4

          There was no mistake then, and no mistake now.

    • TinyElvis

      I remember a short lived tv series on about 10 years ago called E-Ring, in reference to a part of the the pentagon. One of the heros was a black commando who had converted to Islam, and made note how it made him into a better human being.
      One of the episodes actually was about a militant Christian group that takes over a mosque in Dearborn, MI, with a number of Muslim worshippers inside. The E-Ring heroes must gain entrance to the mosque to rescue the poor victimized Muslims from the evil Christians! No wonder the show didn’t last very long!

      • Paul Austin Murphy

        Wow!

        Here in the UK we have a soap called EastEnders. It’s more or less agitprop but not 1960s-style. Each episode has at least two political messages to ram down the viewers’ throats. However, unlike old-style agitprop, which was boring and only appealed to Trotskyists with beards, this soap is sometimes entertaining and dramatic. The writers know that, through “light entertainment”, or through Hollywood, you can spread the Leftist word far better than you could in some arts building frequented by bearded bores.

        I’m waiting for a Hollywood film or TV series about the victimisation of the Nazis during the 1940s or one about how Stalin was really a deeply misunderstood spiritual figure.

        • TinyElvis

          Another common theme on some of the current cop shows like NCIS is getting in some jabs about our ‘torture of innocent people’ at Guantanamo. CAIR and other Muslim advocate groups make sure that truth is avoided at all costs and Muslims are made to be heroes or victims, but NEVER villains.

          • Ace

            Hulu (streaming video) is mercilessly flogging a comedy series about how huggable and funny those lovable Muslim rascals are. “Little Mosque on the Prairie,” IIRCC.

        • Softly Bob

          Eastenders has always portrayed Muslims as peace-loving liberal minded people so as not to cause offence.
          A few years ago a Muslim wedding was featured where the friendly bearded Imam from the local mosque came to visit the happy couple just before the wedding to give them a bit of advice.
          During the wedding the bride wore no veil, and even wore a low cut dress showing her ample cleavage. She looked like a leading actress out of a Bollywood movie.
          Everybody from the local mosque was there to cheer the happy couple.
          Of course, the bridegroom was gay and was secretly having an affair with another male character.
          I remember seeing this at the time and the deliberate lies and dhimmitude employed by the BBC made me want to vomit.

          http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/we-love-telly/css/Enders-wedding-18.12.09.jpg

          • laura r

            wouldnt the gay stuff offend muslims? i would assume there would have been a riot.

          • Softly Bob

            No, they love the fact that the BBC is doing their taqiyya for them.

          • laura r

            i would think the correct ending for the film would be executing the groom. then it would be a moral tale. i think muslim culture is the only one which is put in our face 24/7. if anything it makes me islam-”phobic” rather than indifferent.

          • ennis

            Oh God Eastenders. I watch that soap all the time. I hate almost every character in that show and you wanna know what I love best about it?

            Watching the characters suffer.

          • defcon 4

            A little schadenfreude to bring a smile to your lips?

          • ennis

            Seriously watch the show, they’re all such assholes and the ones that aren’t “assholes” are such pitiful excuses for human beings they don’t deserve any ounce of sympathy from me.

          • lapin.grove

            A gay muslim!!! Well I am shocked, I tell you , just shocked… sarcasm over!

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Like arafat, but one who speaks English better.

            “La Cage Aux Jihad”

          • Paul Austin Murphy
        • Paul of Alexandria

          They show it here on PBS, although I’ve never watched it.

        • SCREW SOCIALISM

          You have the BBC and various pro-islamist politicians (george gallowsway) to defend islamofascists.

      • Daniel Greenfield

        Any anti-terrorist series is required to have a “Good Muslim” on the team now.

        • lapin.grove

          The only good …. oh, nevermind

      • laura r

        it was 10 years before its time. release this now, it will be #1.

      • wileyvet

        Man, look at that Mosque. Man that’s huge. That’s a big Mosque, that’s all I’m sayin’. TCB Baby!

    • Steve Bryant

      Duck Dynasty is the real threat. lol

  • Trebuchet

    I knew it!!!!! All these years it’s been those dam Dutch. That’s why we have those giant windmills all over the place!!! I sure am glad Hollywood exposed that consipracy.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      Their goal… to transition us to a tulip economy.

      • tagalog

        …with legalized recreational marijuana.

        • Daniel Greenfield

          Those tulip sniffers

        • kikorikid

          OK, Might work.

      • kikorikid

        That was tried before, didn’t work.

    • lapin.grove

      LOL cute!! : )

  • ObamaYoMoma

    In real life, terrorists are almost always Muslim.

    You are correct, in the minds of PC multicultural loons like you terrorists are almost always Muslims. However, in real life Muslims are not terrorists at all, as terrorism isn’t even an Islamic manifestation.

    Instead, Muslims are both violent and non-violent stealth and deceptive jihadists, as waging jihad (holy war) in the cause of Allah to make Islam supreme is not only a holy obligation incumbent upon all mainstream orthodox Muslims in one form or another, it is also the only path for Muslims to reach salvation.

    Thus, all mainstream orthodox Muslims in the world, including the millions of Muslim immigrants living in the Western infidel world today and assumed to be so-called moderate Muslims by PC multicultural loons, are jihadists, either violent jihadists (a tiny minority) or non-violent stealth and deceptive jihadists (the vast overwhelming majority).

    Otherwise, Muslims who refuse to fulfill their holy obligation to wage jihad are automatically condemned to hellfire and damnation. Furthermore, if they refuse to fulfill their holy obligation to wage jihad and do it openly, they will also face execution, as blasphemy and apostasy, unlike in actual true faith-based religions of which Islam is not, are capital offenses in Islam. Not to mention that any Muslim that refuses to fulfill their holy obligation to wage jihad, technically is no longer a Muslim, but an infidel instead.

    Indeed, Islam alone puts to death those adherents that refuse to stand by their total, complete, and unconditional submission to the “will of Allah”, which is the first and foremost prerequisite of Islam, and that sets Islam apart from being a true faith-based religion, as it makes Islam a fanatical totalitarian cult instead posing as being a religion to dupe its intended victims.

    Nonetheless, Islam is still moronically considered to be a religion in the minds of PC multicultural loons, who like Muslims don’t have the first clue about what constitutes religion and therefore aren’t qualified to be making life and death decisions like flooding our Western infidel world with Muslim immigrants that are really Muslim jihadists.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      The troll remains a troll.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        Actually, that’s the response I was expecting from you after being bitch slapped in the face by reality. You are, indeed, very predictable.

        • defcon 4

          I’ve never read Mr. Greenfield pulling his punches about islam. I’ve never read him appeal to the PC neologisms like “moderate” or “radical” Islam.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            You are not paying attention closely enough. According to Daniel, a moderate is a Muslim who wants to make Islam supreme slowly and a radical is a Muslim who wants to make Islam supreme immediately.

          • defcon 4

            I’d buy that definition. Two different means to the same islam0nazi totalitarian end.

          • laura r

            daniel is correct. the so called moderate leaders are working from with-in. they go slow but they are effective. the radicals are the ones who get their hands dirty. they set off bombs. the moderates discourage that in a way, they say it gives islam a bad image. it think there are different approaches, many organizations/groups. it also is true that not every muslm wants to destroy the US. i know for a fact that dearborn is divided. i think sharia may win.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            daniel is correct. the so called moderate leaders are working from with-in. they go slow but they are effective. the radicals are the ones who get their hands dirty. they set off bombs. the moderates discourage that in a way, they say it gives islam a bad image. it think there are different approaches, many organizations/groups.

            Okay, here is my position: All mainstream orthodox Muslims in the world are jihadists in one form or another, as waging jihad (holy war) is not only a fundamental holy obligation incumbent upon all Muslims in one form or another, it is also the sole path to salvation for all Muslims as well.

            Thus, all mainstream orthodox Muslims in the world are jihadists in one form or another, either violent jihadists, (a tiny minority), or non-violent stealth and deceptive jihadists, (the vast overwhelming majority). Otherwise, if they refuse to wage jihad per their total, complete, and unconditional submission to the will of Allah and in defiance of their fundamental holy obligation to wage jihad, then such people are not Muslims at all but blasphemous apostates instead that according to the texts and tenets of Islam must be executed. Indeed, it’s pretty cut and dried, as there is no freedom of conscience within Islam to choose not to be a Muslim, and that makes Islam a cult as opposed to being a religion.

            Nonetheless, classifying Muslims that are working from within, as you say, for our own demise, as somehow being moderates is ludicrous. Those people are anything but moderate people. They not only fully intend to eventually subjugate you and me and all of us infidels into Islamic totalitarianism one day through both violent and non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad and the eventual imposition of Sharia in order to make Islam supreme, they are also actively pursuing it. Heck, they wouldn’t be living here in the infidel West if they weren’t.

            Were old Soviet spies caught infiltrating the USA also moderate people? I don’t believe! There are no moderates in Islam! Thus, labeling Muslims as being moderates and radicals is ridiculously absurd. Are there Europeans that are moderates and radicals? How about Asians and Latin Americans? How about Catholics and Buddhists that are moderates and radicals?

            Not to mention that when you use the word – moderate – to describe what are actually jihadists that fully intend to subjugate you by all means at their disposal, in excess of 90 percent of the American population, including all Republican and Dhimmicrat congress critters alike when you listen to what they say, think you are referring to the vast overwhelming majority of the Muslim population in the world, which according to GWB and the PC multiculturalist loons that control the political debate in the West, are peaceful and moderate people who are not at all unlike the adherents of other faith-based religions, even though Islam technically is not even a damn faith-based religion.

            Hence, it’s just ludicrous to continue to use idiotic terms that just play into the PC multicultural fantasies that surround the misperceptions of Islam because whether intended or not it amounts to feeding those PC multicultural fantasies, and that’s my main gripe with Daniel here. Indeed, when he uses terms like moderate, radical, extremist, Islamist, terrorism, terrorist, etc., which were all invented by PC multiculturalists to describe observed inconsistencies from within Islamic society and that are used in essence to cover up the reality of Islam, he is just feeding those false PC multicultural fantasies surrounding the misperceptions of Islam. It would be far better for such terms to be dropped from the vernacular altogether because they are all inaccurate.

            it also is true that not every muslm wants to destroy the US. i know for a fact that dearborn is divided. i think sharia may win.

            Sorry but any person of Islamic persuasion that doesn’t want to subjugate the USA into Islamic totalitarianism via jihad and the eventual imposition of Sharia to ultimately make Islam supreme isn’t a Muslim at all, but instead a blasphemous apostate that per the dictates of Islam must be executed. Yeah, since Dearborn, MI is in the USA as opposed to the Islamic Middle East, there may be a division between Muslims and blasphemous apostates on that matter.

          • laura r

            cenk for young turks (TYT youtube) was born into a turkish muslim family. he grew up in new jersey. he left the religion & is atheist. he speaks about his family, & how they accept him. theres no fatwa on his head, he goes home to visit. maybe turkey is different, as he says 1/2 of the population is secular the other sharia. maybe also the immigrants from 25-30yrs ago were older & less radical in general. even those from from other countries. maybe some were really looking to get away from the radicals. even the past 15yrs, the middle east has gotton more radicalized. beheadings @ one time were one only in SA. now they are law in like 12 other countries. @ one time many women in the middle east dressed western. no more. i still believe there are liberal muslims, who kind of loosly/semi practice. (kind of like reformed jews as opposed to strict othodox). they consider themselves muslims, but the radicals consider them apostates. even robert spencer & pam geller have said that. btw, some hysterical person on atlas shrugs, thinks I AM a muslim. i got more down votes on that blog than i ever have.

          • defcon 4

            Turkish muslimes blew up two synagogues on the same day in the early 21st century and killed 26 people. The longest prison sentence handed down was SIX years, some of others were only three. SIX years for a conspiracy that killed 26 people and blew up two synagogues.

          • laura r

            europe/usa? still 50% of turkey is secular, they even had a justin beiber concert. targeting jews in turkey dosnt surprise me.

          • defcon 4

            Yeah, so “secular” that a S. Korean Christian pastor and his son recently disappeared there. So “secular” that the f’ing Turkish scuzzlums invade Cyprus in the 1970′s and ethnically cleansed 40% of it of the kufr inhabitants. So “secular” they still deny the Armenian Genocide and have made it a crime to discuss it. FOH.

          • laura r

            the 1970s were 40yrs ago. if 50% is secular that is a large amount. they did say on TYT (young turks) that there is much hositity between the 2 groups. no doute that life there is not easy.

          • defcon 4

            They still arrest people of defaming islam in Turkey. How secular is that toots?

          • laura r

            guess one must keep their mouth shut. then it will be fine. btw, the US is becoming close to that, little by little. we have more then 50% secular. like 99%? dont know the %ege of muslims. our govt will somehow get to that point. maybe not arrest, but you would get a fine, or a civil suit. who knows what will happen yrs from now?

          • Daniel Greenfield

            According to Daniel, they both have the same goal of subjugating the world under Islam, but differ on tactics.

            Which is why I called them “so-called moderates” and “so-called extremists”

        • laura r

          yo dude, what is this obsession w/daniel? start your own blog, we are all waiting.

          • Daniel Greenfield

            He can’t start a blog because he has no range of material and doesn’t know the subject.. All he can do is leave the angry comments claiming that everyone else but him is a multicultural PC loon, etc…

      • WhiteHunter

        Too bad those widely acclaimed ‘moderate’ and ‘nonviolent’ muslims are so quiet about denouncing the ‘hijacking’ of their ‘religion of peace’ and voluntarily offering to cooperate with law enforcement to apprehend and prosecute the ‘extremists’ instead of refusing to, as CAIR advises; I can count on the fingers of one hand those truly courageous few who have come conspicuously and publicly forward to do so.

        Here’s something to ponder: How many American muslims would refuse their local imam’s urgent request to shelter a fellow muslim in the basement or attic ‘and not say anything about it if anybody asks’? I’ll bet not many.

        • defcon 4

          “Courageous few”. Let’s hear them. I want to know which muslimes have turned on their own fellow fascists.

          • lapin.grove

            Scarce as hen’s teeth or teats on a rough male hog

        • Daniel Greenfield

          About the only Muslims genuinely opposed to terrorism, as opposed to rejecting some specific terror act, are so secular that they are hardly Muslims in any real sense.

          A handful of those want to create some kind of liberal Islam, but it’s a ridiculously hopeless proposition.

          Real Islam distinguishes between short term gains from terrorism (the so-called extremists) and long term gains through demographic conquest (the so-called moderates.)

      • laura r

        he does take the time to write articals & contribute. (& you dont even have to pay him).

        • Daniel Greenfield

          Unfortunately it’s the same one over and over again

          • ObamaYoMoma

            And it is always in response to your same mistakes that you make over and over again.

          • Daniel Greenfield

            Actually it’s the same thing you post under every article by anyone. I’m just one of the few bothering to respond.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Again, I post the same crap only in response to the same crap whether it’s in response to your same crap or anyone else’s crap.

    • Gee

      Wow consider that only 90-95% of all the terrorist acts in the entire world are committed by Muslims that is something.

      Did you escape from a mental ward again?

      • ObamaYoMoma

        Wow consider that only 90-95% of all the terrorist acts in the entire world are committed by Muslims that is something.
        Did you escape from a mental ward again?

        No…I just haven’t been inculcated into the cult of PC multiculturalism the same way you have. Thus, I know that what you stupidly consider to be terrorism in actuality are really acts of jihad (holy war). Indeed, if as you say 90-95% of all terrorists attacks are perpetrated by Muslims, then that ought to tell you that terrorism in reality happens very rarely, except for when PC multicultural loons like you conflate what are really acts of jihad as somehow being terrorism, because in appearance they look very similar.

        So go on, since Muslims love the fact that you loons are too mentally incompetent to comprehend what is actually happening. Not to mention as well, I bet you believe that terrorism is a result of poverty and despair too.

        Indeed, the PC multicultural elitists whittle down what is really jihad (holy war) to being only terrorism perpetrated by a few radical Muslim extremists who misunderstand the religion of peace, so that they can keep the floodgates wide open for mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage that is really non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad for the long-term strategic purpose of demographic conquest. Yet, you mind numbed robots are too dumb to figure it out.

        Not to mention that jihad, which is a war waged by the entire Islamic community against all religions and all infidels, is far more substantial and profound a problem relative to a few terrorist attacks perpetrated by a few radical Muslim extremists who misunderstand the religion of peace.

        Indeed, if I were half as mentally deficient as you, I’d personally commit myself to a mental ward.

        • lapin.grove

          Something stinks here… IT IS YOUR BS POSTING!! JUST YUCK@!

    • defcon 4

      Didn’t muhammad, the most revered and perfect man in all of islam, state “I have been made victorious through terror”? At least according to
      Bukhari, Vol 4, Book 52. 220.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        Didn’t muhammad, the most revered and perfect man in all of islam, state “I have been made victorious through terror”? At least according to
        Bukhari, Vol 4, Book 52. 220.

        No he said that he had been made victorious through jihad, which is an Arabic word, and then some English translator later translated the Arabic word jihad into terror, exactly like you and all your brethren that have also been inculcated into the false fantasy of PC multiculturalism.

        Not only that, but terrorism and jihad are two very different and distinct things altogether. For instance, terrorism is extreme violence perpetrated usually against innocents by extremists for various political causes, and as such is always and only violent. Meanwhile, jihad is a holy war waged by the entire Islamic ummah against all religions and all infidels to ultimately make Islam supreme and as such it manifests both violently and non-violently via stealth and deception.

        Waging jihad is also a holy obligation incumbent upon all Muslims in one form or another and as a matter of fact it is the only path for Muslims to reach salvation. Thus, in stark contrast to terrorists who are all extremists, all mainstream orthodox Muslims in the world are jihadists in one form or another, either violent jihadists (a small minority), or non-violent stealth and deceptive jihadists (the vast overwhelming majority).

        Moreover, it is only the PC multiculturalists and their fervent adherents who whittle Muslim violence down to being terrorism perpetrated by only a few radical Muslim extremists who misunderstand Islam, while at the same time opening the doors wide open for mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage that in reality is really non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad for the long-term strategic purpose of demographic conquest, in a long-term quest for one world government with open borders and with everyone living in peace and harmony under a one world Marxist utopian state. It’s a fallacy just as much as mislabeling what is really jihad as being terrorism.

        One more time, Jihad is a perpetual holy war waged by the entire Islamic ummah against all religions and all infidels to ultimately make Islam supreme. Meanwhile, terrorism is always and only extreme violence usually perpetrated against innocents for various political causes, as opposed to the political cause of making Islam supreme. The only similarity between the two very different and distinct manifestations is that the seemingly senseless violent version of jihad appears to be terrorism but it’s not. It’s jihad, which is a holy war and a holy war is far more profound relative to terrorism.

        Indeed, if the masses routinely called jihad attacks what they actually are jihad as opposed to terrorism, it would automatically be understood by everyone that the Islamic world is waging jihad against all religions and all infidels to ultimately make Islam supreme.

        • lapin.grove

          Just a huge dump of BS your post!

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Okay Muhammad.

        • Daniel Greenfield

          Incorrect. The word used is not Jihad and you would know that’s not the case if you actually looked at the context of the quote instead of rushing to dump your usual cut and paste trolling into the mix.

          بِالرُّعْبِ

          • defcon 4

            Do you know Arabic as well as Hebrew Mr. Greenfield?

          • ObamaYoMoma

            I’ve seen it translated also as “awe”. So I guess
            Muslims are violent awerists! Okay.

          • Daniel Greenfield

            Terror and awe overlap. It does not however say Jihad.

  • tagalog

    I must admit, this commentary is worthy of Ann Coulter. Good job.

  • Raymond_in_DC

    Beyond Serbs and white industrial types, there’s yet another favorite terrorist trope: US soldiers.

    In “Die Hard 2″ terrorists holding an airport hostage on behalf of a South American drug lord are former elite soldiers, and the elite soldiers sent to take down the terrorists are in fact in league with them. In “The Rock”, a Marine General, despondent at the government’s abandonment of US soldiers, leads a hand-picked team of other soldiers who seize stockpiles of chemical weapons and hold San Francisco hostage. Many of the latter are just in it for the money.

    And just to show that TV isn’t immune to this meme, in an episode that infuriated many “Castle” fans, New York City is under threat of a dirty bomb. Clues initially point to Syrian immigrants, but we later learn this is a false flag operation by a few US special forces guys, concerned Americans were becoming complacent about the ongoing terror threat. So they intend to “nuke” Manhattan to remind them. A critical clue to cracking the case comes from… Syria’s intelligence guy in New York. Uh, what?

    • http://libertyandculture.blogspot.com/ Jason P

      Ah, yes, the “Muslim foil!” This is now ingrained in the American psyche. After a decade of “you bigots suspected a Muslim” the media now can’t even say Islamic terrorist. Remember the writer who said “I hope the Boston Marathon bomber is white to prove the Muslim bigots wrong?” It turns out that this writer was the bigot and Tsarnaev brothers were both white and Muslim.

      With all the colorful jihadi you’d think this would be rich pickings for Hollywood. Jihad Jane? Tsarnaev brothers and their evil mother? Fort Hook Army shrink? The Black Widows of the Caucaus and the White widow from the UK? Comic book writers couldn’t create such colorful villains.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      Ah yes, the predictable “false flag” op by American warmongers looking to start a war.

  • Harry_the_Horrible

    IIRC, there is a LOT of Arab money in Hollyweird.
    Hollyweird is not going to offend folks from whom they wish to extract money, esp. if it gives them an option to insult folks they hate anyway, like Christians and patriots.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      That’s true. Qatar and the UAE are pumping a lot of money into Hollywood now.

      • laura r

        the producer runs the show. the investor is the top dog. the director is glad to have the job, so is the writter. its all show biz. (strange but not surprising- a business run by jews, financed by arabs).

        • Daniel Greenfield

          Not to mention China

          • laura r

            and the publishing industry too. they bought in. multi culti international media.

    • laura r

      i just wrote a comment about that. besides hollywood, they were several hundred living in boston. they all left right after 9/11.

  • logdon

    I watched World Trade Center some time back and the blatant back to front revisionism of weeping Muslims as the news hit, pouring out mass grief around the world made a bad film almost a laughable parody out of a bad film.

    Nothing was further from the truth and the image of an ugly, podgy and badly bespectacled Palestinian woman beaming with huge delight remains my abiding image of how the ‘Religion of Peace’ reacted to the horror.

    Whether it’s Three Kings spoiling it with a beatific Iran taking in Iraqi refugees or the howwible round up of New York Muslim innocents in an otherwise prescient film, The Siege, Islam has to be protected.

    I think the Jack Nicholson character’s tour de force in a completely different situation, You just can’t handle the truth, sums it up.

    And it’s not only in Hollywood.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      At least Oliver Stone didn’t show that the planes were really holograms controlled by the Pentagon.

      • logdon

        I think the falling man video by a French crew who happened to be there put paid to that.

        Those thuds as people hit the ground brought the sickening reality home as nothing else could.

        That was the aural image of people actually dying and probably in the way radio is often a more powerful imaginary stimulus than TV, merely the sound of death was enough to confirm the worst fears.

        Here’s a link.

        http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0312318/

        • Daniel Greenfield

          Truthers will still believe anything but the truth.

          • logdon

            True!

          • lapin.grove

            Their brains need re-wiring or a bullet!

    • WhiteHunter

      Read the text of the reauthorization of the Patriot Act (the actual legislation, not a movie of that name, if there is one).

      It begins with a sickening preamble dictated, I understand, by the late, unlamented Ted Kennedy and adamantly demanded by his fellow P.C. Dems, repeatedly insisting that Muslims were primarily the victims, not the perpetrators, of the 9/11 massacres, and praising the “many” Muslims in New York who “heroically” sacrificed themselves in attempts to rescue the few survivors.

      Not much mention of the 340+ NYFD and NYPD heroes who died in the smoldering rubble of the Towers, though.

      If GWB had been as good at demagoguery as his haters were and are, he might have tried to block that mendacious preamble before signing it; but since that’s never been one of his skills or inclinations, he didn’t.

      But look it up. You’ll be appalled.

      • Daniel Greenfield

        If GWB had been the man he should have been, he would have done to the Democrats what the Democratic Republicans did to the Federalists.

        That’s exactly what the Dems were afraid of and so they put on some phony patriotism for a few months.

    • defcon 4

      sarcastically speaking, the paleswine are starving due to the siege being imposed on them by the evil Israelis. Your viewpoint can’t be reality!

      • lapin.grove

        Those fatties crying again for MORE candies are they?

        • defcon 4

          You know what might be a unique candy to market in Gaza? Candied camel urine, healthy and sweet, a fun-filled treat for every jihadi!

  • Shelter Somerset

    You have to wonder what the Left Wing is really afraid of.

    • kikorikid

      They are afraid of White-male Christian/Conservatives.
      The guys with the really big swords.

    • laura r

      investors?

    • lapin.grove

      The Almighty God Jehovah!

    • defcon 4

      Maybe they’re afraid that if they and their islam0nazi pals win, they’ll still lose.

  • Paul of Alexandria

    1) I like shows like “Criminal Minds” and” Law and Order”, but I notice that every terrorist or villain encountered is white, male, and (nominally) Christian. Several times the bad-guys have been greedy (white, male, nominally Christian) pastors/priests. No Muslims anywhere in sight, except perhaps as a red herring for the detective to chase in place of the real (white, male) unsub.
    2) Look carefully at shows like “Sleepy Hollow”. The heroes are fighting an army of demons and witches – but there’s no sign of God, much less Christianity, in sight. The only 2 priests (inevitably Catholic) were killed off by the demons within 2 minutes. The heroes depend on magic and good intentions to get the job done.

    This is not merely biased writing, it is subtle anti-Christian, anti-West propaganda.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      It’s not very subtle anymore, but yes.

    • kikorikid

      Come on Paul, Of course it is! But take specificity to one
      more level and you get to the White-male/Christian/Conservative.
      The real Target. Your analyses is spot on and points out
      propaganda techniques/diversions.

  • WhiteHunter

    The Serbs have a probably well-deserved reputation for ruthless brutality. But I can’t think of a recent case where they’ve caused much trouble outside of their own besieged borders, at least not since one of them tossed a lit match into “the powder keg of the Balkans” in the summer of 1914. Apart from holding a Medal of Honor U.S. president hostage in “Air Force One,” that is. And all the other well-known instances of “Serb nationalist terrorism” mentioned in this article, of course.

    No doubt we’ll soon see a movie in which an evil Pope is using the Vatican crypt to hide rogue priests who are stockpiling RPGs while his neo-Nazi bishops set up secret concentration camps to torture 12-year-old rape victims who’ve had abortions.

    Oops, I shouldn’t have said that. It might give the Hollywood script writers and producers an idea for a “plot.”

    • Daniel Greenfield

      Ir probably alread did.

    • lapin.grove

      The Serbs wwere not actually responsible for WWI. IT WAS MUCH more complicated . But since you are an obvious SERB HATER…let me tell you about REAL Serbs….during WWII they saved over 500 American flyers who had been shot down by the Croatian NAZIS Under Draza Mahailovic the Serbs made an air strip for the Americans to land the rescue aircraft..right under the Nazis nose. The Serbs hide and fed all the Americans….at the expense of Serbian civilians been killed because they would NOT turn them over to the Nazis. Draza was accused by commie Croatainb Tito of working for the Nazis and had him MURDERED! The American Congress awarded Draza with a medal for saving Americans.

      • lapin.grove

        All the while the war was going on, the Bosnian muslim NAZIS and Croatian NAZIS and their own organized SS, operated the LARGEST KILLING concentration in Europe called JASENOVAC ..LOOK IT UP!!! Those Croats and Bosnians murdering over 500,000 Serbian Christians ,over 20,000 Jews and over 15,000 Romas( Gypsies) .
        When the civil war was STARTED by the Bosnian muslims in 1993, it was UNARMED SERBS who were the FIRST victims of their wrath. No Serb wanted to stand by and experience a NEW MODERN JASENOVAC. But hey, the West did NOT care after WWII and they sure did not care in 1993!!
        When the Serbs fought back they are brutal, the West accuses. And when the Serbs are murdered by Croats and Bosnian muslims in a CIVIL WAR … it is JUST ho hum BY THE WEST!
        Well, the Iran terror connection is STILL strong in Bosnia and 3 of the 9/11 hijackers were working with the Bosnian muslims in the civil war in Yugoslavia and BIN LADEN carried a BOSNIAN passport. Several others were involved in the planned Millenium Bombings and convicted. There were about 11 more Bosnians and their allied Iranians and Saudis involved in terror plots in the USA since 9/11.
        NOT ONE SERBIAN PERSON .
        No Serbians are TERRORISTS killing Americans . NOT even any kind of ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN plotting to bomb the USA… THIS IS HYPER-INSULTING!!
        Have a memory of a CROATIAN TERRORIST hijacking an American plane back in the 1970s…. but nobody even remembers.

        • Drakken

          Well it seems that the buildup in Bosnia by the muslims for another go at it, has escaped everybodys notice. Frankly as long as the Serbs are wiping out muslims, its all good. Just wait until it starts up in a European city near you, then it will get really interesting.

  • Niku

    I remember two movies that were banned in Indonesia when I worked there. One of them was “True Lies,” and the other was, “Schindler’s List”. True Lies wasn’t liked because it had bad guys that were Muslims. Schindler’s List was banned because it gave an unbalanced, prejudicial view of Germany. [Not my thoughts]

    • Daniel Greenfield

      True Lies was probably the last large scale release of its kind that could ever be made.

      • defcon 4

        A Schwarzenegger movie being mentioned in the same sentence as Schindler’s List, who would’ve thought that could ever happen?

      • BS77

        The Delta Force with Chuck Norris, was so totally un PC, anti liberal, pro military action against terrorists….never could be made today. It actually showed US special forces as heroes, freeing people and destroying the terror vermin.

        • tagalog

          Look at the reception Lone Survivor is getting among our progressive brethren. A “recruiting spot” for the SEALs? Who would want to try to become a SEAL after watching a movie in which the Rules of Engagement are such that they must make a decision between killing enemy civilians or being killed themselves, making the decision to spare the civilians so as to avoid life in Leavenworth, then 3/4 of the team dying agonizing deaths with the last survivor crtitically injured?

        • Daniel Greenfield

          Delta Force was, I believe, made by Golan Globus, who were Israelis, and I don’t mean of the Haim Saban or Arnon Milchan variety.

          • BS77

            Chuck Norris was great in Delta Force…really took it to the bad guys….

        • ennis

          Fuck it, I’m downloading that movie tonight.

      • BS77

        Another totally UN PC film was Wanted Dead or Alive with Rutger Hauer, where he takes on the terrorists and cleans house. My favorite line is when the arch terrorist says, “I am a soldier of God”
        Hauer replies…”No, you’re just a fly on a pile of S—.”

        • Drakken

          I personally loved the part where he says eff the bonus and pulls the pin in the grenade that just happened to be in the hajis mouth, priceless!

      • Niku

        Niku,
        Second thoughts. Maybe there’s a ray of hope. Laugh if you will, but could it be that the box-office failure of many of these films was due to bad reviews? I know that movie reviewers are not the most conservative group around, but could it be that even they sometimes find something so obviously propagandistic that they have to say something? It’s possible, isn’t it?

        • Daniel Greenfield

          Public disinterest I imagine is a larger factor

    • laura r

      there are more muslims in indonesia than any other country.

      • Niku

        And?

  • JVictor

    The Hunger Games will continue to rule the box office because so many people can see the frightening correlation of a corrupt government working hand-in-hand with media of all sorts to keep the dumb masses entertained and subjected to the ruling class. The Hunger Games is art imitating reality.

  • defcon 4

    I wouldn’t bother to see a hollywood movie if you gave me the tickets these days. Who wants to waste 2 hours of their life watching hollywood drek?

  • JoJoJams

    Great piece, Mr. Greenfield! ~

    • Daniel Greenfield

      thank you

  • Race_Dissident

    Terrific piece, Greenfield.

  • TinyElvis

    Wonder how Lone Survivor made it out of the editing room. You’d think the Hollywood elite would have made them replace the Taliban with right wing militia.

    • Aditya Vivek Barot

      It’s got its usual share of “what’s the point of it all” and “the government is using us a canon fodder” throwaways which most people just ignored. Kinda like the HBO series “Generation Kill.”

      • SCREW SOCIALISM

        Islamism is using their young as canon fodder – with the promise of “72 Virgins” as an incentive to die for some old sheik/imam/ayatollah.

        • defcon 4

          I always wonder, what do women get out of islam again? Unless they’re LGBT, or like little boys, it would seem islamic heaven doesn’t have a lot to offer them.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            The perk for Islamist women is that they don’t get stoned to death. They have no use for 72 virgins.

    • tom_billesley

      … or Burmese monks

  • Steve Bryant

    Daniel, the same thing is going on in TV commercials. My favorite is a Direct TV spot where a guy gets bored and goes through a progression of increasingly bad consequences that ultimately ends with his father caught up in the middle of a looting riot. Not a single rioter is black. Of course, that would be a cliche! duh!
    Absolutely incredible.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      Like the multicultural gangs so common in the major cities… of television.

      • defcon 4

        I remember the video for Beat-it featured such multicultural gangs — all stylishly dressed.

      • Steve Bryant

        lol

  • Daniel Greenfield

    The troll remains a troll.

  • Paul Austin Murphy

    It seems that even a right-wing bigot like me has been brainwashed by stereotypes and assumptions. I simply assumed that he was a Christian. (Perhaps because I’m English and didn’t follow the story.) Despite that, I did say that he didn’t do what he did as a Christian or FOR Christianity. That’s the mistake Muslims make. Simply because someone who killed someone was a Christian, or because certain wars were carried out by Christians, they assume they were “Christian killings” or “Christian wars”. But they weren’t. Muslims are judging Christians by their own standards.

    A Christian doesn’t kill with the New Testament on his lips. Muslims killed with the Koran and hadith on their lips. The Koran has a complete “war ethic”. The New Testament simply doesn’t.

    Violent jihad is written deep into Islam. The Crusades, which occurred a 1000 years after the beginnings of Christianity and were also responses to the Muslim invasions of Christian lands, are not talked about, as such, in the New Testament, which is not to say the Crusades weren’t legitimate.

    As for race, I hate positive or inverted racism almost as much as I hate negative racism. Positivism racism (or discrimination) actually feeds negative racism anyway. If someone is given a job because he’s black, then how’s a white person supposed to react to that? Similarly, when a Muslim is patronised and excused because he’s got brown skin, what sort of reaction is that supposed to get from non-Muslims with white or yellow skin?

    • A Z

      “A Christian doesn’t kill with the New Testament on his lips. Muslims killed with the Koran and hadith on their lips. ”

      Many militant atheists will disagree.

      I have seen to many you tube and other film clips where jihadis are shouting Allahu Akbar as their fire a rifle, watch a comrade suicide bomb civilians or cut someone’s head off.

      • Paul of Alexandria

        A Z: you miss the point. “Many militant atheists will disagree”; they might, but they have no basis in fact on which to rest their arguments. Nowhere do Christian teachings – either from Jesus Himself or the Apostles – call for conversion by the sword. Now a Christian may act in the capacity of soldier or police officer, as a representative of his/her government, and may have to kill in this capacity. But this is not killing “in the name of Christ”! (The doctrines of Vocations and Just War gets somewhat to deep to discuss fully here).

        On the other hand, as Robers Spencer amply demonstrates at http://www.jihadwatch.org/ Muslims are called to kill and conquer in the name of Allah. Convert, submit as a dhimmi, or die are the only options.

        • Paul Austin Murphy

          There are a couple of passages in the New Testament which can be deemed that way: such as, “I bring the sword, not peace.” (My paraphrase.) And “I will set brother against brother…” But these very few passages, perhaps at most five, hardly constitute an “ethic of war” or jihad. And they have nothing to do with forced conversation either.

          Besides which, unlike in the Islam and Koran case, no Christians are using these passages to engage in Christian jihad. Sure, over the years there might have been ten to twenty Christians who might have done so. But they would obviously have been exceptions or mad.

          In other words, these five or less passages would have inspired about a handful of deaths in the last twenty years or so. In the Koran, there are well over one hundred explicitly jihadist passages. And the jihad has continued ever since. And apart form the explicit calls for violence, there are also the endless passages of hate towards the Jews, Christians, infidels, polytheists, etc. These passages occur in almost every paragraph. They are at the heart of the Koran.

          • defcon 4

            Yeshua never advocated for, nor participated in, the murder of anyone, for any reason.

          • Paul of Alexandria

            “Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword.” Matthew 10:34. See also Luke 22:36.

            Any reasonably close study of these passages shows that they do not call Christians to active war. Rather, they predict that Jesus’ message and the actions required of Christians will cause other people to act hostile towards them. Precisely what is now happening to the Copts in Egypt, and Christians in other Middle-Eastern countries and Africa, actually.

            When Jesus says For I have come to ‘set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law’ (Matthew 10:35) He isn’t calling for us to rebel against our parents – against the Fifth Commandment. Rather, He is pointing out that we must hold our Christian Faith more important than even our family relationships, and this will cause tension and even violence against us.

          • Paul Austin Murphy

            I agree. But you can see how people may use these passages to make some point against Christianity. They certainly do so about the Old Testament. But even in that case there is no “ethic of war”. There are many accounts of wars, violence and conflicts. But they are mainly narratives – even though they are parables and have moral messages. To say that the Old Testament is violent is akin to saying that George Orwell’s 1984 or Moby Dick is violent – and leaving it at that. Nonetheless, my position on the Old Testament is certainly not the same as my position on the New Testament. But I’m neither a scholar nor a theologian.

        • defcon 4

          I believe Yeshua inveighed someone (Matthew?) to put away his sword instead of defending Yeshua when the authorities came to take him into custody.

          • Paul of Alexandria

            It was Peter. And yes, Jesus knew that He had to take the path chosen for Him.

      • defcon 4

        Funny how the “militant atheists” have f&$k all to say about islam — even when islam0nazis are calling for the death of their fellow unbelieving brethren in Bangladesh.

      • lapin.grove

        I watched a video of the recent beheading of a Roman Catholic priest by those US supported “rebels” in Syria all the while the s.o.bs all around were shouting that satan is great good…. I mean their “god” is great

    • Paul of Alexandria

      The Crusades were a response by the Holy Roman Empire to the invasion of the Holy Land by Muslims. Unfortunately, times being what they were and people what they are, the Crusaders spent as much time fighting each other and sacking other Christian cities (e.g. Constantinople) as they did fighting the Muslims.

      You’re point is right though – nowhere are Christians called to convert by the sword, but rather through example and teaching.

      However: The violent injunctions of the Quran and the violent precedents set by Muhammad set the tone for the Islamic view of politics and of world history. Islamic scholarship divides the world into two spheres of influence, the House of Islam (dar al-Islam) and the House of War (dar al-harb). Islam means submission, and so the House of Islam includes those nations that have submitted to Islamic rule, which is to say those nations ruled by Sharia law. The rest of the world, which has not accepted Sharia law and so is not in a state of submission, exists in a state of rebellion or war with the will of Allah. It is incumbent on dar al-Islam to make war upon dar al-harb until such time that all nations submit to the will of Allah and accept Sharia law. Islam’s message to the non-Muslim world is the same now as it was in the time of Muhammad and throughout history: submit or be conquered. The only times since Muhammad when dar al-Islam was not actively at war with dar al-harb were when the Muslim world was too weak or divided to make war effectively. http://www.jihadwatch.org/islam-101/

  • StarTripper

    I remember when Hollywood rewrote The Sum of All Fears so that the Muslim terrosts became Euro Neo-Nazis. I skip it all and just watch my copy of True Lies.

  • http://silencethemessenger.blogspot.com/ Iman Infidel

    Thank you for this article! It made me sick I wasted my time and money on the movie,”Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit”, and glad to see others also saw the lame plot to their movie, “Tom Clancy – OP Center’ made Israel seem like the bad guy as well

    • Daniel Greenfield

      That it did

  • mikegiles

    Hollyweird people are public personalities, their faces are known all over the planet. As such they are scared to death, of the IslamoNuts. They can all see themselves reduced to bloody fragments, when some Islamist self detonates while they’re on the red carpet. Theo Van Gogh was a caution to them all.

    • SCREW SOCIALISM
    • laura r

      am i projecting? i was in beverly hills like in 1989 or so. there were many arabic people sitting in restuarants etc. i heard they were buying up nice traditional homes, demolishing them, rebuilding. they were all over the place in their $150,000 cars. maybe they invest in films? just wondering.

  • Donald J DaCosta
  • the Buffoon

    You got your envelopes mixed. This one was supposed to go to the Onion.

  • USARetired

    Muslims are the enemy of the World, and America’s very worst enemy, and thiat includes our sitting idiot!

    • defcon 4

      He’s no idiot, but he’s betrayed his oath to support the US Constitution, if he ever took that oath.

      • Painted Horse

        The botching of the oath was most likely deliberate and never completed privately as they stated.

  • ennis

    as i recall there was a tv show years ago about islamic terrorism, it was called “the cell”, which was a about a muslim who worked undercover for the fbi and was infiltrating a terrorist cell. Bout of course this was one of those show that didn’t hold back in it anti-anericanism. you the know the usual pandering to islam, moral equilance between america and it enemies, the terrorists are just poor downthrodden people who had been wronged by america, etc etc

  • yyarko

    One has to wonder how come the Serbian government hasn’t yet filed an official complaint over this continuous slander…

    Excellent article, as usual!

  • itaintmojo

    Notice now re Sochi olympics, they are hunting for “terrorists”, but they never tell you who these terrorists are. Muslim Sharia advocates.

    • defcon 4

      I noticed that myself. Of course, I don’t think Russian law enforcement is as stupid/corrupt/craven as the enemedia.

      • itaintmojo

        And I doubt Russian people are kept as clueless, and uninformed as Americans are, as to the identity of “terrorists”.

    • tic…tic…BOOM

      Has anyone noticed that Russia, a great exporter and supporter of terrorism including the Muslims in the Middle East, is now fighting Muslim terrorism in Russia? Ironic.

      • Drakken

        Russia in the old Soviet days did that, Russia in todays world don’t, sure they sell arms to the savages to wipe each other out. The Russians unlike us, are not afraid to call a spade a spade and actually hunt down and kill muslim jihadists unlike us who keep at this whole idiocy with a law enforcement mindset.

  • quillerm

    Hollywood has become the Lefts Official Ministry of Propaganda. Just like their friends at AP, MSNBC, CNN, ABC, Huffington Post, and the NYT.

  • Paul of Alexandria

    There’s also some indication that McVeigh was involved with and trained by an oversees intelligence operative, possibly Iraqi.

    • A Z

      Yes, I believe it. I just can’t prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt.

      The Bojinka plot was originated or planned in the Phillipines

      “April 1999 (some sources say summer 1999)— ATTA is seen by multiple witnesses at the Woodland Park Resort and Hotel in Mabalacat, Phillipines, on the outskirts of Clark Field. He has his first flying lessons on ultralights at the Angeles City Flying Club.”

      http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/683026/posts

      Terry Nichols married a Filipina and went back to the Phillipines without her. Now he was slapping his wife down and telling her I am going there ti engage in zex tourism or he was meeting with jihadis.

      Now critics of a conspiracy theory had better damn well prove that Nichols was engaged in zex tourism. He might have done both.

      I don’;t see why people are not curious and do not want to get to the bottom of why Nichols was in the Phillipines

      • lapin.grove

        “Bojinka” is a Serbo/Croatian/Bosnian( heck they speak the SAME SERBIAN LANGUAGE) word for EXPLOSION… it was organized by a muslim from the Middle East who fought in the civil war in Yugoslavia with the Bosnian muslims.

        • A Z

          I did not know the etymology of the word. THX! It makes a valuable point about how the jihadis go from Bosnia to Chechnya to Uzbekistan to …

          It will take a long time and some people will be in denial forever but jihadis wash like a wave from 1 side of the word to another. So if one country is experiencing jihad it is our problem It is everyone’s problem. because some jihadis will retire, some will die but the rest will go on to the next jihad. They will go on jihad in every country and the reason can’t all be blow back because of what the west did or because of poverty. Those are the usually excuses of the LEFt.

  • bob e

    sheesh..mebbe’ they could dispatch bieber to sochi..before it’s too late ..
    the serbian olympic team.. !!

  • Edgar Davidson

    And when Hollywood makes a ‘true-life’ movie in which there can be no avoiding the fact that there were Muslim terrorists – such as Munich – the writers still manage to ensure they get a across the ‘moral equivalence’ message: the Israelis who went after the terrorists were ‘just as bad as the terrorists themselves’

    • Daniel Greenfield

      It’s always “think about who the real terrorists are”.

      And it’s… us.

  • celador2

    They are afraid of jihad targeting Hollywood if they step out of line, one and two, Hollywood are self loathers. They agree with jihad aims and want to cover up and apologize for them. Focus elsewhere but on the ones who do pull the trigger.

    • 11bravo

      They also do not want to die, just like the NYT admitted.

    • defcon 4

      Penn, of Penn and Teller fame, was asked why he never applied his vitriolic criticism of Christianity to islam, he said something to the effect of we have families.

  • popseal

    Is it the role of the DHIMMI in a ‘pre-sharia law’ environment to hide what Islam really means to the sheeple targeted? For example, don’t tell New Yorkers what the CORDOBA MOSQUE PROJECT means around the Muslim world, as it harkens to the Cordoba “victory mosque” built in Spain after 200+ years of jihad.

  • AugustineThomas

    All you secularists don’t yet realize that your culture is the most hypocritical and preposterous in history?

    • liberalism is a mental illness

      Do any of you leftards realise that what you say never makes sense and nobody cares. Go live in Syria if you think you’d be better off in a less hypocritical and proposterous place.

    • liberalism is a mental illness

      What’s a secularist? Are we all secularists on this board? What culture are you referring to? How can a culture be a hypocrite? History of what the universe? What does your comment have to do with Jack Ryan?

  • lapin.grove

    Now it smells like pig droppings… pee U go away troll. Get gone. PIGGY!!

  • Jack Ryan is garbage

    I just saw the movie Jack Ryan Shadow Recruit and was I ever disgusted to see that the film makers chose Russians to be the bad guys. And of all places for the Russian bad guys to be operating out of they chose Dearborn, Michigan!! What a piece of junk this movie is. Disgusting. A slap in the face to Russians who we need more than anybody to be our friends.

  • herb benty

    Islam wants to annihilate all Jews and Christians, a far left Holywood finds that possibility just too good to pass up. Same as the Democrats.

    • laura r

      they are thinking about all the $ they will make from the films. the arabs are the investors. hollywood people live in gated or privately run areas. powerful jews & arabs live side by side. they may not sence a threat, or feel that it wont affect them.

      • herb benty

        The love of money, is the root of all evil.

        • laura r

          no. selfish people are the root of all evil.

  • Ian

    Acid satire, man. Good reading.

  • Tanks-a-lot

    It is possible that Clinton hires made 9/11 possible. But it is absolutely true that muslims did the deed.

    Every time someone tries to say it wasn’t muslims I show them this.

    http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2001/12/the_mosque_to_commerce.html

    Yamasaki received the World Trade Center commission the year after the Dhahran Airport was completed. Yamasaki described its plaza as “a mecca, a great relief from the narrow streets and sidewalks of the surrounding Wall Street area.” True to his word, Yamasaki replicated the plan of Mecca’s courtyard by creating a vast delineated square, isolated from the city’s bustle by low colonnaded structures and capped by two enormous, perfectly square towers—minarets, really. Yamasaki’s courtyard mimicked Mecca’s assemblage of holy sites—the Qa’ba (a cube) containing the sacred stone, what some believe is the burial site of Hagar and Ishmael, and the holy spring—by including several sculptural features, including a fountain, and he anchored the composition in a radial circular pattern, similar to Mecca’s.

    • defcon 4

      His pandering to islamic supremacism didn’t save his buildings from islamic demolition, nor the nearly 3000 people inside.

  • tom_billesley

    What was the last Hollywood movie with arab/muslim villains? “The Siege” (Denzel Washington) was released in 1998.

  • SMP2010

    They try to appease the muslim terrorists because they know if they angered them, heads would roll, literally.