If Only Obama were as Determined to Take on Ebola, as He Was Christie and Cuomo

Ebola-a-workplace-virus

Liberals finally have something to celebrate.

Obama took on Christie and Cuomo and won. No more Ebola quarantine because science, the new science, says that you don’t need to quarantine people with potentially deadly diseases. You can just let them wander around the place. Like Craig Spencer.

Obviously Obama took on Christie and Cuomo because their quarantine regs were making him look like the sloppy Ebola-friendly lefty that he was. But setting that Ebola free also seems to be a matter of principle with Obama.

After all this is the guy who dumped large numbers of disease-ridden illegals across America, distributing them across as much of the country as possible, leading to at least one epidemic.

Because… you know… science.

Obama has shown no desire to seriously deal with Ebola. His CDC was churning out zombie comics instead of legitimate guidelines on contact. The same buffoons screeching on television about science led to Ebola infections spreading with their “science”.

But when there was something that genuinely made him angry, like potential Ebola infectees being quarantined, he got right on it.

Sure Obama is lazy, but he’s also selectively lazy. When he doesn’t care about something, like the lives of millions of Americans, he’s out to lunch. But when he does care about something, his people will apply unrelenting pressure to two governors who were trying to protect their own people.

…while making him look bad.

  • truebearing

    The pattern is unmistakable. obama is bent on punishing the United States in every way he can. The only rational conclusion is that Ebolabama wants to destroy this nation. He is vindictive, he is evil, and he needs to be quarantined for the rest of his miserable curse of a life.

  • Pete

    More Medevac from the Hot Zone

    “When the Obama Administration announced plans to send troops to West Africa to battle the Ebola crises, we were told that military personnel would face minimal risks. They wouldn’t be treating actual patients we were assured; instead, the mission would focus on building new treatment centers, training local health care workers and handling related tasks, including logistics and security.

    So, if the chances of contracting the deadly disease are low, why is the Pentagon developing its own, portable isolation units that can be loaded into military transports, and remove more infected individuals from the hot zone?”

    • truebearing

      The same reason as every other time…they are lying.

  • http://www.stubbornthings.org NAHALKIDES

    Let’s hope some other Republican governors have more spine than Christie. And never underestimate how much it helps Obama to have the media working for him. On the radio this morning, I heard the AP report the story by claiming a quarantine was “unscientific”. This was represented as fact, not opinion! The Left now assumes it’s being “scientific” in this matter as in so many others when nothing could be further from the truth. Maybe be should tell our Lefty “friends” that the Germ Theory of Disease is “settled science”.

    • Pete

      I like the parts of life best, when the media are not interested in them.

      That is when you most likely have the truth.

      Quarantine