ISIS Separated “Young and Pretty” Yazidi Women


The real War on Women has always been Mohammed’s thousand year Rape Jihad.

As the militants with the al-Qaeda-inspired Islamic State surged into the area from surrounding Arab villages two weeks ago, snaring those who had not managed to flee, they showed a marked interest in detaining women, notably the youngest and prettiest, according to witnesses, relatives and in some instances the women themselves.

Women were separated from men, then younger women were separated from older ones and most were shunted off in buses or trucks.

The Sinjar Crisis Group, formed by Yazidi activists in Washington, has compiled a list of 1,074 names of female captives reported by their relatives to be in the custody of the Islamic State.

Once at the school, the eyewitness said, the youngest women again were parted from older ones and driven away, along with a dozen or so boys between ages 10 and 12 who had apparently been detained with their mothers.

Why were the boys detained? It’s an open question, but the UN recently condemned ISIS for raping teenage boys.

The Washington Post story tries to put ISIS in the best light and denies that any rapes have taken place.

The women “are considered apostate, and it is haram [forbidden] for Muslims to marry a non-Muslim,” said Hoshyar Zebari, a senior Kurdish leader who until recently served as Iraq’s foreign minister. He puts the number of women detained at more than 1,000.

That’s not really true. And it’s certainly true that non-Muslim women can be taken as slaves and raped. Mohammed did it frequently.

Conversion by force is how Islam expanded. Kill the men. Threaten to kill the women unless they convert. ISIS is showing us how Islam began.

  • rbla

    In addition to allowing polygamy and permitting easy divorce to his male adherents, the Prophet also provides ample verses promoting the rape of captives and the institution of sexual slavery:

    Prophet! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowries, and those whom thy right hand possesseth of those whom Allah hath given thee as spoils of war…
    Surah 33:50

    It is not allowed thee to take (other) women henceforth … save those whom thy right hand possesseth.
    Surah 33:52

    Save with their wives and those whom their right hands possess…
    Surah 70:30

    And if ye fear that ye will not deal fairly by the orphans, marry of the women, who seem good to you, two or three or four; and if ye fear that ye cannot do
    justice (to so many) then one (only) or (the captives) that your right hands possess.
    Surah 4:3

    And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) that your right hands possess.
    Surah 4:24

    And marry such of you as are solitary and the pious of your slaves and maid-servants.
    Surah 24:32

    Successful indeed are the believers; Who are humble in their prayers; … And who guard their modesty; Save from their wives or the (slaves) that their right hands possess, for then they are not blameworthy.
    Surah 22:1-6

    And all married women are forbidden unto you except those captives whom your right hand possesses. It is a decree of Allah for you. Lawful unto you are all beyond those mentioned, so that you seek them with your wealth in honest wedlock, not debauchery.
    Salih Muslim, Book 8:3371

    • John Kirk

      For those who think these verses do not represent “mainstream Islam,” think again. Here is a Q&A from a mainstream Muslim advice site:

      At the present time, is it Halal to have a sexual intercourse with your Loundi (a female prisoner of war) without getting married to her?.

      Praise be to Allaah.

      A wife becomes permissible after shar’i marriage and a female slave becomes permissible to the man who owns her. She may originally be a prisoner of war, and a Muslim may obtain a concubine from the ruler or commander if he took part in fighting in jihad, or if he buys her from her owner. She becomes permissible for him by virtue of his ownership after it is established that she is not pregnant by waiting for one menstrual cycle, or until she has given birth if she is pregnant.

      Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

      “And those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts, from illegal sexual acts)

      6. Except from their wives or (the slaves) that their right hands possess, ـــ for then, they are free from blame”

      [al-Mu’minoon 23:5-6]

      It was narrated that Abu Sa’eed al-Khudri said: The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said, concerning the prisoners of Awtaas: “Do not have intercourse with a pregnant woman until she gives birth, or with one who is not pregnant until she has menstruated once.” Narrated by Abu Dawood, 2157. This hadeeth was classed as saheeh by Shaykh al-Albaani in Irwa’ al-Ghaleel, 187.

      In the answer to question no. 10382 we have stated that Islam permits a man to have intercourse with his slave woman whether he has one or more wives or he is not married.

      In the answers to questions no. 5707 and 12562 it states that female prisoners of war may be distributed by the commander in jihad, because he has the choice of either distributing them, or ransoming them or setting them free.

  • Pete

    If Genghis Khan was wrong, then Mohamed was wrong. And the Qur’an is …?

    “Temujin had them rounded up and slaughtered. Then he assembled the dead men’s wives and sorted them into groups, those that would make suitable concubines, and those who were better suited as slaves.

    The Rise and Fall of the Second Largest Empire in History
    (How Genghis Khan’s Mongols Almost Conquered the World)
    by Thomas J. Craughwell

    “raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan” – John Forbes Kerry

  • Dallasyaherd

    Even if you are not conservative, you have to realize the left of today is not a real left! Islam is not a natural thing the left should be defending, it is the worst invention in human history. The only connection the 2 have is almost all Muslim poor live off of the UN and welfare. Islam is more extreme than Hassisdic Judaism and has 1`.2 billion murderers willing to lie for it. That’s your underdog?!?!? Something is completely wrong today

    • R. Wibowo

      First thing first, mr. Daniel Greenfield is a Jew. Second, he doesnt know anything about real Islam. Third, ISIS are hiding behind Islam and theyre totally a libel for Moslem peoples, fourth, ISIS are made in USA and their allies. Fifth, ISIS is just diversion for Israel invasion to Palestines. Sixth, do not ever judging Mohammed if youre just studying Islam, Quran, Hadiths by partial. Seventh, Islam teaches moslem how to be a clever person, loving peace and “how-to” enter the paradise. Last, one day you’ll know what i mean if you’re not in this ‘temporary’ world anymore. Wassalamualaikum Wr Wb.

      • EugeneSavoy

        Think there is no terrorism in religion?

        Think again.

        Qur’an 3:151 “We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve.”

        The Muslims and modern liberals who claim jihadists have hijacked Islam do not have any authoritative, canonical arguments for their position.

        Jihadis routinely quote chapter and verse of Islamic sacred texts in support of their violence against unbelievers

        • Dallasyaherd

          Note the hypocrisy which is everywhere every time that guy opened his mouth, he first notes Greenfield is a Jew, that’s his major case. The group killed out of every middle eastern country who they all hate the most, has no right to talk, that’s where his argument ends.

      • jetcal1

        All you say maybe true. Please;
        1. Provide proof from verifiable sources ISIS was created by USA.
        2. Please provide verifiable Islamic condemnation of ISIS from an established Cleric that has established credibility with multiple western governments.
        The fact is, there are enough problems within Islam and so many negative headlines that fewer people each passing day have any tolerance for the practitioners of this “peace loving” religion.

        • Isahiah62

          yeah sure wib

          • jetcal1

            He is obviously experiencing technical difficulties cannot open the attachment.

      • Moa

        False. You don’t even know your own superstition.

        Go and read hadith Sahih Muslim 6985.

        Go and read about the doctrine of naskh (abrogation) that changes *everything* about Islam.

        We know the Sunna and how Mohammed was the most evil man alive.

        We understand that Mohammed was polytheist *after* he supposedly was visited by Gabriel, and willingly prayed to the gods Allah, Al Uzza, Al Lat and Manat. Go and read your own documents.

        We know about your taqiyya, kitman, tawriya and muruna. We know your personal jihad is to lie to us to advance your evil ideology.

        Either you don’t know your own totalitarian and satanic ideology, or you think we don’t know anything about Islam. In either case, your statements are *wrong* – and you are the enemy of Free People everywhere.

  • IndianaMatthew

    …and Obama just parties and play golf…

    • kcbg

      There are plenty of things that Obama deserves criticism for… taking a few hours off to play a round of golf during his presidency is not one of them.

  • chezwick

    Why call it a “thousand year rape Jihad”? Why not be accurate and call it a “1400-year rape Jihad”?

  • Bill Cervetti

    Daniel , your last line is probably the most brilliant thing you’ve written! Kudos!
    I said the same thing, with a wholly different emphasis, about Robert Duvall’s great film, THE APOSTLE.

    • Dallasyaherd

      Great movie

  • halevi

    Islam shows it’s true face. Most of the world is in lala land and doesn’t care. Sadly, they’ll be woken up the hard way.

  • Chip

    The true face of Islam is being revealed.