<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lead Author of UN Climate Report: Government Officials, Not Scientists, Rewrote It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/lead-author-of-un-climate-report-government-officials-not-scientists-rewrote-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/lead-author-of-un-climate-report-government-officials-not-scientists-rewrote-it/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=lead-author-of-un-climate-report-government-officials-not-scientists-rewrote-it</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 07:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/lead-author-of-un-climate-report-government-officials-not-scientists-rewrote-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5406008</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 06:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224271#comment-5406008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s hard to say which is worse between the UN and the ACA. They represent the same kind of dangers from different angles and actually the UN can exploit the ACA. They now have a central database to run &quot;global wealth disparity&quot; metrics and to apply their bullshit theories about what should be done. It will be exactly the same model as the &quot;global warming&quot; solution in the form of something like a &quot;carbon tax&quot; or &quot;health disparity&quot; tax. They need to float some trial balloons first to see how to sell it and what to call it.


I wish those were just paranoid words.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to say which is worse between the UN and the ACA. They represent the same kind of dangers from different angles and actually the UN can exploit the ACA. They now have a central database to run &#8220;global wealth disparity&#8221; metrics and to apply their bullshit theories about what should be done. It will be exactly the same model as the &#8220;global warming&#8221; solution in the form of something like a &#8220;carbon tax&#8221; or &#8220;health disparity&#8221; tax. They need to float some trial balloons first to see how to sell it and what to call it.</p>
<p>I wish those were just paranoid words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaoMoo</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/lead-author-of-un-climate-report-government-officials-not-scientists-rewrote-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5405958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CaoMoo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 01:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224271#comment-5405958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The IPCC has it&#039;s head so far up it&#039;s own butt it needs a colonoscopy to do a brain scan. Add this to the East Anglia university climate gate shennanigans.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IPCC has it&#8217;s head so far up it&#8217;s own butt it needs a colonoscopy to do a brain scan. Add this to the East Anglia university climate gate shennanigans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaoMoo</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/lead-author-of-un-climate-report-government-officials-not-scientists-rewrote-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5405957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CaoMoo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 01:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224271#comment-5405957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh wow more corruption from the Warming crowd. Yeah when 5th grade science pokes enormous holes in your science well you were screwed to start.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh wow more corruption from the Warming crowd. Yeah when 5th grade science pokes enormous holes in your science well you were screwed to start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steeloak</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/lead-author-of-un-climate-report-government-officials-not-scientists-rewrote-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5405884</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steeloak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224271#comment-5405884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is modern day Lysenkoism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is modern day Lysenkoism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Pangburn</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/lead-author-of-un-climate-report-government-officials-not-scientists-rewrote-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5405854</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Pangburn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224271#comment-5405854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Discover the
cause of the warming, the end of it, why temperatures are (unfortunately)
headed down and what to expect.

 

There are only two primary drivers of average global temperature change. They very accurately explain
the reported up and down measurements since before 1900 with R2&gt;0.9
(correlation coefficient = 0.95) and provide credible estimates back to the low
temperatures of the Little Ice Age (1610). 

 

CO2 change is NOT one of the drivers. 

 

The drivers are given at

 

http://agwunveiled.blogspot.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Discover the<br />
cause of the warming, the end of it, why temperatures are (unfortunately)<br />
headed down and what to expect.</p>
<p>There are only two primary drivers of average global temperature change. They very accurately explain<br />
the reported up and down measurements since before 1900 with R2&gt;0.9<br />
(correlation coefficient = 0.95) and provide credible estimates back to the low<br />
temperatures of the Little Ice Age (1610). </p>
<p>CO2 change is NOT one of the drivers. </p>
<p>The drivers are given at</p>
<p><a href="http://agwunveiled.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://agwunveiled.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UCSPanther</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/lead-author-of-un-climate-report-government-officials-not-scientists-rewrote-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5405805</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[UCSPanther]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224271#comment-5405805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When supposedly scientific results are fabricated to support a narrative and skepticism is regarded as heresy, it is no longer science.  It is an ideology.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When supposedly scientific results are fabricated to support a narrative and skepticism is regarded as heresy, it is no longer science.  It is an ideology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glpage</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/lead-author-of-un-climate-report-government-officials-not-scientists-rewrote-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5405751</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[glpage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224271#comment-5405751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much of what is considered science nowadays is not truly science.  Scientists tend to work on government funded projects.  If their research doesn&#039;t support the ideology of the politicians they tend to not get funded for future research.  And that pretty explains the scientific consensus on AGW.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much of what is considered science nowadays is not truly science.  Scientists tend to work on government funded projects.  If their research doesn&#8217;t support the ideology of the politicians they tend to not get funded for future research.  And that pretty explains the scientific consensus on AGW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liz</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/lead-author-of-un-climate-report-government-officials-not-scientists-rewrote-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5405680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[liz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224271#comment-5405680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right. That&#039;s like saying Obama care ought to be reformed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right. That&#8217;s like saying Obama care ought to be reformed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 449/456 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 02:07:55 by W3 Total Cache -->