Liar and Thief Married to an Adulterer Says Bible is Her Biggest Influence


I would have guessed Moll Flanders or Insider Trading for Dummies, but apparently it’s the Bible. This comes just in time for the release of a tape on which Hillary Clinton laughs as she discusses freeing a child rapist and attacking his 12-year-old victim.

“If you had to name one book that made you who you are today, what would it be?” asked The New York Times, in a book review questionnaire.

“At the risk of appearing predictable, the Bible was and remains the biggest influence on my thinking,” Clinton said. “I was raised reading it, memorizing passages from it and being guided by it.”

As a follow up question, was Hillary guided more by the bible when she covered up Benghazi, her husband’s affairs or claimed that a little girl who had been raped was emotionally unstable and shouldn’t be believed?

Which bible passages did she find most applicable to stealing White House furniture and supporting abortion?

Maybe it was “Do what you want as long as it’s paying off for you.”

Or “There is a beast in man that needs to be exercised, not exorcised.”

That’s from the Satanic Bible, but Hillary Clinton deliberately left which bible she was memorizing ambiguous.

Clinton explained that she was a voracious book reader, naming off multiple writers who made an impact on her. “I’ve got a pile of books stacked on my night stand that I’m reading — or hoping to get to soon,” she said.

Or hoping to be photographed in public with…

Of the Russian novel The Brothers Karamazov, Clinton explained, “[It] made a lasting impression on me when I read it as a young woman.”

When she was running for office in 2008, she claimed it was Little Women. But you can’t expect Hillary to keep her lies straight. She’s not exactly Nixon.

Still I think we can all safely say what Hillary Clinton’s real favorite book is. Its pages are worn and creased with the rubbing of her hands and the stains of her baleful saliva. And if eyes could sear paper, it would have turned to ash by now.

The amount of hatred lavished on its composition makes the Satanic Bible seem like a child’s storybook.

Aides on Hillary Clinton’s failed 2008 presidential campaign kept a detailed list of Democrats they felt had betrayed her by backing Barack Obama in their long and bitter primary fight, according to a new book.

“Almost six years later most Clinton aides can still rattle off the names of traitors and the favors that had been done for them, then provide details of just how each of the guilty had gone on to betray the Clintons—as if it all had happened just a few hours before, write the authors, reporters Jonathan Allen of Politico and Amie Parnes of The Hill. “The data project ensured that the acts of the sinners and saints would never be forgotten.”

There’s Hillary’s bible of hate. She memorizes its verses and learns lessons of hate from every page.

  • darnellecheri

    “There are six things that the Lord hates, seven that are an abomination to Him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discord among brothers.” -King Solomon, Proverbs 6:16-19
    In all that voraciousness, I guess she didn’t memorize that one.

  • wileyvet

    She really does show disdain for the intelligence of Americans. She must be the only one that believes this. No, the books that influenced her were The Communist Manifesto, Das Kapital, Mao’s Little Red Book and Saul Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals and maybe Betty Freidan’s The Feminine Mystique. What a total sham. This woman calculates every thing she does for political advantage, so this is more of the same.

    • ca1

      she’s a dangerously flawed person… who we actually know more about… obama has the same psychopathology…. heaven help us!

  • Marylou


  • unionville

    I think she must have skipped a few chapters.

    • truebearing

      You think?

  • herb benty

    Well, it worked for Obama.

  • truebearing

    Yes, her favorites are the Bible and “Rules for Radicals.” She must have just forgotten Alinsky’s manual for political evil. It’s good thing she studied her Bible so faithfully. When she read Alinsky’s dedication of his book to Lucifer, she knew exactly who he was.

    So now Hillary has admitted to being an Islamophobe. She’s a person of “the Book.” That won’t go over too big with the Muslims, or the Muslim enabling Left.

    I find it hard to believe she really liked The Brothers Karamazov, but then she never actually said she liked it. She said it made “a lasting impression” on her, but things you intensely dislike can do that, too. The Bible influenced her, but she never said how. It could have been a visceral hate-driven desire to reject its message in every way she could. Judging by her actions, my guess is that she prefers the Satanic Commandment; “Do as thou wilt.” It’s so much more like Alinsky’s “the end justifies the means.”

  • WhiteHunter

    If Hillary has actually “read” any books at all–any of the important classics, at least–she’s always used a ghost reader (or maybe the Cliff’s Notes versions, if she “has time”), just as she uses a ghost writer to write “her” books.

    So I’ll give her a summer reading list of just three titles: Orwell’s “1984,” Koestler’s “Darkness at Noon,” and Kafka’s “The Trial.”

    Then there’ll be a three-hour, closed-book, proctored exam for her to take in mid-August. Just three essay questions:

    1. “Compare and contrast the Orwellian world of ‘1984’ and the omniscient, totalitarian government’s methods in the book with what is happening now in the U.S. and the Obama administration’s methods of dealing with independent thought and dissent. Cite at least five specific examples in the book and their specific, comparable parallels in the behavior of the Obama administration.”

    2. “Discuss, analyze, and explain the narrator’s blind loyalty to the Stalin regime and his willing collaboration in its evil up to the moment of his own imprisonment and execution in ‘Darkness at Noon’ and compare it to the feelings of present-day Democrats towards the Democratic Party and the Obama and Clinton regimes. Define and discuss the nature of evil, and account for the motives of its participants with specific references to the text of the book.”

    3. “The central character in ‘The Trial’ suddenly finds himself the target of unspecified but frightening ‘charges’ for ‘crimes’ that are never clearly defined. A faceless bureaucracy makes it impossible for him to respond to these charges or even to know what they are so that he can clear himself. Compare and contrast Kafka’s hero’s predicament with that of the victims of the present-day IRS, EPA, NSA, and as many other present-day government agencies you can name.”

    Come to think of it, this reading list and essay exam should be required of every American high school senior and college freshman as well.

  • CaroleCairnsosu

    my Aunty Allison recently got a nice 6 month old Jaguar by
    working from a macbook.this website C­a­s­h­d­u­t­i­e­s­.­C­O­M­

    • The March Hare


  • cacslewisfan

    Only a true sociopath can lie like she does.

  • Webb

    In the photo above, Bill is scared spitless that the camera crew will turn off the lights when they leave the bedroom. You can bet he’s feeling for the floor with his foot.

    • Brendan

      Unfortunately it’s a doctored picture I’m afraid

  • Webb

    Hopefully she’ll be eaten by dogs like her favorite Bible character Jezebel.

    • sammid

      Yes! I’ve said that for years! lol

  • Jack Diamond

    The lasting impression made by the Brothers K must have been the character of the Grand Inquisitor (“man is tormented by no greater anxiety than to find someone quickly to whom he can hand over that great gift of freedom with which the ill-fated creature is born”) a fictional character invented by another fictional character, “everything is permitted” Ivan Karamazov, the theoretician of a murder carried out by his illegitimate brother, Smerdyakov, who is the son of the mute and mentally-challenged “Reeking Lizaveta”. Come to think of it, Reeking Lizaveta may turn out to be Hillary’s true incarnation, based on recent statements. She badly needs to work on the mute part. Ivan is driven mad with guilt, so she probably is not Ivan and no doubt she imagines herself the bewitching Grushenka or the saintly Alyosha but that kind of grotesque is more suited to a Gogol…

  • juanmeden

    It’s her biggest influence when she starts whacking that fool husband of hers upside the head with it.

  • Ernie kaputnik

    Hillary is truly a repugnant and decrepit person without a soul. And despite this obvious fact there are millions of people that will vote for her. What does that say about our country?