<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Muslim Terrorist States Argue Over Which of Them is Distorting Islam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 00:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: josephherring</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam/comment-page-1/#comment-5354186</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[josephherring]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=214433#comment-5354186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is not a conspiracy, this is an actual fact. The grand Mufti Muhammad Amin al-Husayni assisted Hitler during WWII. They both met together several times. There are even pictures of them together. Now as you can see by the pictures I have provided that this is not some kind of conspiracy, but instead the truth. Anything else you would like to know?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a conspiracy, this is an actual fact. The grand Mufti Muhammad Amin al-Husayni assisted Hitler during WWII. They both met together several times. There are even pictures of them together. Now as you can see by the pictures I have provided that this is not some kind of conspiracy, but instead the truth. Anything else you would like to know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelu Roman</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam/comment-page-1/#comment-5354127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nelu Roman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 09:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=214433#comment-5354127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well.... I am sorry for you, I can name not only just one mistake, but many, many more. Let&#039;s take this verse from Qur&#039;an Q:18:86 &quot;Until  he ( Zul- Quranain) reached the setting of the sun. He found it set in a spring of murky water&quot;. Zul- Quarain is considered today by most Islam scholars as referring to Alexander the Great. During the time of Mohammad  it was believed that he conquered the whole world, until at  the place where the sun &quot;set in a spring of murky water&quot;. Of course, there is no such a place on the Earth. But at that time it  was believed that the Earth is flat and the sun moves in sky from east to west, rising from a place and setting in another.
Q:78:6
&quot;We made the Earth as a bed&quot;  it is clear that the Earth doesn&#039;t look like as a bed, it is round and not flat, but the Qur&#039;an is a book written in 7th century and it reflects popular believes characteristic at that time. I could remind you about verses stating that  stars are used as missiles against &quot;jins&quot; or  mountains were  laid down only  to prevent the Earth from shaking. In fact,  the process is quite &quot;vice-versa&quot;, when  mountains form the Earth is shaking. As I said, there are  still  many more other  scientific errors in Qur&#039;an, and if we add to these mistakes the  Hadiths mistakes all what we get is 1001 Nights like fairy tales. It is not need you become an agnostic because of this, neither science is able, at this particular time, to prove or to disapprove the existence of a God.The problem is not that. The problem is  you should not take a book, doesn&#039;t matter what book, as the supreme truth in anything it says. The world evolved in any aspect of our existence, so, for sure, a 17th century book cannot be than outdated in many aspects. A book like Qur&#039;an can be useful as a  spiritual guide, but when it tries to deal with material matters it cannot be than wrong. For sure God could not  let his creation limited to the sayings of such an outdated book. He must have created something that to update itself according to the times. And that is our conscience. This conscience, unlike any book, has evolved  along the centuries. Imagine that the human kind is like a computer. The best computers are those that include programs that update themselves. Can be God less skilled in this regard than a soft programmer? As long as you consider Qur&#039;an as a tool that helps you to improve your spiritual relationship with God, you could be absolutely right. If you try to apply all its verses to  your material day-by-day life  of our times, you could not be more wrong. It is clear, you cannot arrive to God by science, but by faith, and for sure not by blind faith, but by a faith  carved from a conscience that evolved along the centuries. Of course, if you think that any  human being  exists only to be a slave of Allah, then anything I said has no relevance to you,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;. I am sorry for you, I can name not only just one mistake, but many, many more. Let&#8217;s take this verse from Qur&#8217;an Q:18:86 &#8220;Until  he ( Zul- Quranain) reached the setting of the sun. He found it set in a spring of murky water&#8221;. Zul- Quarain is considered today by most Islam scholars as referring to Alexander the Great. During the time of Mohammad  it was believed that he conquered the whole world, until at  the place where the sun &#8220;set in a spring of murky water&#8221;. Of course, there is no such a place on the Earth. But at that time it  was believed that the Earth is flat and the sun moves in sky from east to west, rising from a place and setting in another.<br />
Q:78:6<br />
&#8220;We made the Earth as a bed&#8221;  it is clear that the Earth doesn&#8217;t look like as a bed, it is round and not flat, but the Qur&#8217;an is a book written in 7th century and it reflects popular believes characteristic at that time. I could remind you about verses stating that  stars are used as missiles against &#8220;jins&#8221; or  mountains were  laid down only  to prevent the Earth from shaking. In fact,  the process is quite &#8220;vice-versa&#8221;, when  mountains form the Earth is shaking. As I said, there are  still  many more other  scientific errors in Qur&#8217;an, and if we add to these mistakes the  Hadiths mistakes all what we get is 1001 Nights like fairy tales. It is not need you become an agnostic because of this, neither science is able, at this particular time, to prove or to disapprove the existence of a God.The problem is not that. The problem is  you should not take a book, doesn&#8217;t matter what book, as the supreme truth in anything it says. The world evolved in any aspect of our existence, so, for sure, a 17th century book cannot be than outdated in many aspects. A book like Qur&#8217;an can be useful as a  spiritual guide, but when it tries to deal with material matters it cannot be than wrong. For sure God could not  let his creation limited to the sayings of such an outdated book. He must have created something that to update itself according to the times. And that is our conscience. This conscience, unlike any book, has evolved  along the centuries. Imagine that the human kind is like a computer. The best computers are those that include programs that update themselves. Can be God less skilled in this regard than a soft programmer? As long as you consider Qur&#8217;an as a tool that helps you to improve your spiritual relationship with God, you could be absolutely right. If you try to apply all its verses to  your material day-by-day life  of our times, you could not be more wrong. It is clear, you cannot arrive to God by science, but by faith, and for sure not by blind faith, but by a faith  carved from a conscience that evolved along the centuries. Of course, if you think that any  human being  exists only to be a slave of Allah, then anything I said has no relevance to you,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veracious_one</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam/comment-page-1/#comment-5354060</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Veracious_one]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 03:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=214433#comment-5354060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Qur’an  can only be fully understood in Arabic.  One cannot criticize Islam without  knowing Arabic.

The Truth:

Although  Muslims often tell critics of Islam to &quot;read the Qur&#039;an,&quot; they are usually  unprepared for what happens when their advice is heeded.  An honest  translation of Islam&#039;s holiest book generally reinforces negative opinion.   The fallback is to then claim that the Qur&#039;an can only be understood in Arabic.

Of all the  efforts to artificially insulate Islam from intellectual critique, this is  probably the most transparent.  Unfortunately, for those Muslims craving  reassurance from the more embarrassing passages of the Qur’an and Sunnah, this  cheap tactic of arbitrarily dismissing anything they disagree with still comes  at a heavy price, since Islam cannot be protected in this way without  sacrificing its claim to being a universal religion.

In the  first place, it is fundamentally impossible for anyone to learn a language that  cannot be translated into the only one they do know, which means the apologists  who insist that one &quot;must learn Arabic” in order to understand the Qur’an are  committing a logical fallacy.  Either the Arabic of the Qur’an is  translatable (in which case there is no need to learn Arabic) or it is not (in  which case it can never be learned by the non-native speaker).

Enter the  skeptic.  While every language has its nuances, how is that Arabic is the  only one with words and phrases that are literally untranslatable?  More  importantly, why in the world would Allah choose to communicate his one true  religion for all people in the only language that cannot be understood by all  people?  Even the vast majority of Muslims and their imams do not speak Arabic.

Even more  suspicious is that this amazing linguistic “discovery” was only recently made – and that it  corresponds quite remarkably with the contemporary rejection of Islamic  practices that were considered acceptable up until the religion’s recent  collision with Western liberalism.  In fact, the argument that hidden and alternate meanings exist to  unflattering Qur’anic passages (justifying slavery, the inferior status of women, sexual gluttony,  holy warfare, wife-beating, and religious discrimination) perfectly corresponds with the level of  embarrassment that modern scholars have about the presence of such verses in the  Qur’an!

No other  world religion claims that it can only be fully understood in one language.  Neither is the same level of  effort required to massage primary messages into palatability.  While the  Bible is distributed pretty much as is by various Christian groups,  for example, it is rare to find a Qur’an that does not include voluminous and highly  subjective footnoted commentary deemed necessary to explain away the  straightforward interpretation of politically-incorrect passages.

An  additional problem for the apologists is that they want to have it both ways.   On the one hand they declare that (for some strange reason) the &quot;perfect book&quot;  can&#039;t be translated and that Allah&#039;s perfect  religion thus cannot be understood by most of humanity without a  battery of intercessors and interpreters.  Then they turn around and blame  the reality of Islamic terrorism on this same &quot;necessary&quot; chain of  intermediaries by claiming that the Osama bin Ladens of the world  have simply gotten bad clerical  advice, causing them to “misunderstand” the true meaning of the Religion of  Peace (in the most catastrophic and tragic way imaginable).

Of course,  another irony here is that, as a Saudi, the Qur’an-toting Osama bin Laden  was a native Arabic speaker – as are most of the leaders and foot  soldiers in his al-Qaeda brotherhood of devout Muslims.  In fact, many  critics of Islam are Arabic speakers as well - a fact that is often ignored by  the apologists, who only find Arabic linguistic skills relevant when they are  lacking (not that the same pundits have ever been known to care about whether a  critic of the Bible speaks Hebrew or Greek).

At this  point there is only one avenue of escape for the beleaguered apologist - the  weak claim that the Qur’an can only be understood in Classical Arabic, an  obscure Quraish dialect which has not been commonly used in over a thousand  years and is only known by a few hundred people alive today (generally Wahabbi  scholars, who are - ironically enough - accused of taking the Qur&#039;an &#039;too literally&#039;).  

It is hardly plausible that the differences between classical and modern Arabic  are of such significance that peace and tolerance can be confused with terrorism,  but even if this  were true, it merely begs the question all the more.   Why would such a “perfect book” be  virtually impossible for the rest of us to learn - and susceptible to such  horrible &quot;misinterpretation&quot; on an on-going basis?

 Really, it isn&#039;t hard to see through this childish game, particularly since the  rules are applied only to detractors and not to advocates.  Apologists  never claim that Arabic is a barrier to understanding Islam when it comes to  lauding the religion, no matter how less knowledgeable those offering praise are  than the critics.  Neither do they qualify the claim that &quot;Islam is the  fastest growing religion&quot; with the caveat that new converts (or the vast  majority of existing Muslims) don&#039;t understand Islam since they can&#039;t read the  Quran in Arabic.

Obviously,  the real reason for this illogical myth is that the  information age is now making the full history and texts of the Islamic religion  available to a broader audience, and the contents are highly embarrassing to both Muslim  scholars and their faithful flock.  Pretending that different meanings  exist in Arabic is means of self-assurance and saving face with others.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Qur’an  can only be fully understood in Arabic.  One cannot criticize Islam without  knowing Arabic.</p>
<p>The Truth:</p>
<p>Although  Muslims often tell critics of Islam to &#8220;read the Qur&#8217;an,&#8221; they are usually  unprepared for what happens when their advice is heeded.  An honest  translation of Islam&#8217;s holiest book generally reinforces negative opinion.   The fallback is to then claim that the Qur&#8217;an can only be understood in Arabic.</p>
<p>Of all the  efforts to artificially insulate Islam from intellectual critique, this is  probably the most transparent.  Unfortunately, for those Muslims craving  reassurance from the more embarrassing passages of the Qur’an and Sunnah, this  cheap tactic of arbitrarily dismissing anything they disagree with still comes  at a heavy price, since Islam cannot be protected in this way without  sacrificing its claim to being a universal religion.</p>
<p>In the  first place, it is fundamentally impossible for anyone to learn a language that  cannot be translated into the only one they do know, which means the apologists  who insist that one &#8220;must learn Arabic” in order to understand the Qur’an are  committing a logical fallacy.  Either the Arabic of the Qur’an is  translatable (in which case there is no need to learn Arabic) or it is not (in  which case it can never be learned by the non-native speaker).</p>
<p>Enter the  skeptic.  While every language has its nuances, how is that Arabic is the  only one with words and phrases that are literally untranslatable?  More  importantly, why in the world would Allah choose to communicate his one true  religion for all people in the only language that cannot be understood by all  people?  Even the vast majority of Muslims and their imams do not speak Arabic.</p>
<p>Even more  suspicious is that this amazing linguistic “discovery” was only recently made – and that it  corresponds quite remarkably with the contemporary rejection of Islamic  practices that were considered acceptable up until the religion’s recent  collision with Western liberalism.  In fact, the argument that hidden and alternate meanings exist to  unflattering Qur’anic passages (justifying slavery, the inferior status of women, sexual gluttony,  holy warfare, wife-beating, and religious discrimination) perfectly corresponds with the level of  embarrassment that modern scholars have about the presence of such verses in the  Qur’an!</p>
<p>No other  world religion claims that it can only be fully understood in one language.  Neither is the same level of  effort required to massage primary messages into palatability.  While the  Bible is distributed pretty much as is by various Christian groups,  for example, it is rare to find a Qur’an that does not include voluminous and highly  subjective footnoted commentary deemed necessary to explain away the  straightforward interpretation of politically-incorrect passages.</p>
<p>An  additional problem for the apologists is that they want to have it both ways.   On the one hand they declare that (for some strange reason) the &#8220;perfect book&#8221;  can&#8217;t be translated and that Allah&#8217;s perfect  religion thus cannot be understood by most of humanity without a  battery of intercessors and interpreters.  Then they turn around and blame  the reality of Islamic terrorism on this same &#8220;necessary&#8221; chain of  intermediaries by claiming that the Osama bin Ladens of the world  have simply gotten bad clerical  advice, causing them to “misunderstand” the true meaning of the Religion of  Peace (in the most catastrophic and tragic way imaginable).</p>
<p>Of course,  another irony here is that, as a Saudi, the Qur’an-toting Osama bin Laden  was a native Arabic speaker – as are most of the leaders and foot  soldiers in his al-Qaeda brotherhood of devout Muslims.  In fact, many  critics of Islam are Arabic speakers as well &#8211; a fact that is often ignored by  the apologists, who only find Arabic linguistic skills relevant when they are  lacking (not that the same pundits have ever been known to care about whether a  critic of the Bible speaks Hebrew or Greek).</p>
<p>At this  point there is only one avenue of escape for the beleaguered apologist &#8211; the  weak claim that the Qur’an can only be understood in Classical Arabic, an  obscure Quraish dialect which has not been commonly used in over a thousand  years and is only known by a few hundred people alive today (generally Wahabbi  scholars, who are &#8211; ironically enough &#8211; accused of taking the Qur&#8217;an &#8216;too literally&#8217;).  </p>
<p>It is hardly plausible that the differences between classical and modern Arabic  are of such significance that peace and tolerance can be confused with terrorism,  but even if this  were true, it merely begs the question all the more.   Why would such a “perfect book” be  virtually impossible for the rest of us to learn &#8211; and susceptible to such  horrible &#8220;misinterpretation&#8221; on an on-going basis?</p>
<p> Really, it isn&#8217;t hard to see through this childish game, particularly since the  rules are applied only to detractors and not to advocates.  Apologists  never claim that Arabic is a barrier to understanding Islam when it comes to  lauding the religion, no matter how less knowledgeable those offering praise are  than the critics.  Neither do they qualify the claim that &#8220;Islam is the  fastest growing religion&#8221; with the caveat that new converts (or the vast  majority of existing Muslims) don&#8217;t understand Islam since they can&#8217;t read the  Quran in Arabic.</p>
<p>Obviously,  the real reason for this illogical myth is that the  information age is now making the full history and texts of the Islamic religion  available to a broader audience, and the contents are highly embarrassing to both Muslim  scholars and their faithful flock.  Pretending that different meanings  exist in Arabic is means of self-assurance and saving face with others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veracious_one</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam/comment-page-1/#comment-5354059</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Veracious_one]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 03:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=214433#comment-5354059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a lot of Muslims don&#039;t know Arabic...does that make them bad Muslims?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a lot of Muslims don&#8217;t know Arabic&#8230;does that make them bad Muslims?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clevs</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam/comment-page-1/#comment-5354049</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clevs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 02:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=214433#comment-5354049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[youre a fucking dumbass. generalizing. i otta tell your mother. lol]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>youre a fucking dumbass. generalizing. i otta tell your mother. lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clevs</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam/comment-page-1/#comment-5354045</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clevs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 02:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=214433#comment-5354045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thats probably got something to do with them being cornered by a group of idiots who think they know Islam and the Qur&#039;an better than Muslims... Possibly]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats probably got something to do with them being cornered by a group of idiots who think they know Islam and the Qur&#8217;an better than Muslims&#8230; Possibly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clevs</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam/comment-page-1/#comment-5354046</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clevs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 02:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=214433#comment-5354046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[prime example: this thread]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>prime example: this thread</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clevs</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam/comment-page-1/#comment-5354043</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clevs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 02:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=214433#comment-5354043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;scientific errors&quot; ????? name one scientific error that is in the Qur&#039;an. Please I will become agnostic if you can list one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;scientific errors&#8221; ????? name one scientific error that is in the Qur&#8217;an. Please I will become agnostic if you can list one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clevs</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam/comment-page-1/#comment-5354041</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clevs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 02:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=214433#comment-5354041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[never disputing the Qur&#039;an.. Im disputing the way you think you know Islam. If you dont know arabic, how do you expect to know what the Qur&#039;an translates into when you have a completely biased outlook on Islam]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>never disputing the Qur&#8217;an.. Im disputing the way you think you know Islam. If you dont know arabic, how do you expect to know what the Qur&#8217;an translates into when you have a completely biased outlook on Islam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clevs</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam/comment-page-1/#comment-5354040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clevs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 02:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=214433#comment-5354040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you implied it..... we do not idolize him.. he was the best man (human being) to ever walk on Earth. He knew Gods rules for us first hand. We follow what he does to prevent mistakes. Christians idolize a man. You got the wrong religion]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you implied it&#8230;.. we do not idolize him.. he was the best man (human being) to ever walk on Earth. He knew Gods rules for us first hand. We follow what he does to prevent mistakes. Christians idolize a man. You got the wrong religion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clevs</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam/comment-page-1/#comment-5354037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clevs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 02:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=214433#comment-5354037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pretty sure one of hitlers top things was that he did not like people with brown hair and brown eye. quit with your conspiracies]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pretty sure one of hitlers top things was that he did not like people with brown hair and brown eye. quit with your conspiracies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mein Camp</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam/comment-page-1/#comment-5352941</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mein Camp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 08:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=214433#comment-5352941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed. When I was tried at Nuremberg, I explained to my prosecutors that Nazism is really a Political Movement of Peace and that any...erhum...improprieties...*cough*....that may have happened are the responsibility of those who have hijacked a peaceful and noble ideology and that there is nothing in our visionary leader&#039;s book, Mein Kampf, that encourages bigotry or violence. Honest.

My defence was accepted, and I was then taken through the Vatican ratlines to join the core of the CIA with over 10,000 of my peaceful co-ideologues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. When I was tried at Nuremberg, I explained to my prosecutors that Nazism is really a Political Movement of Peace and that any&#8230;erhum&#8230;improprieties&#8230;*cough*&#8230;.that may have happened are the responsibility of those who have hijacked a peaceful and noble ideology and that there is nothing in our visionary leader&#8217;s book, Mein Kampf, that encourages bigotry or violence. Honest.</p>
<p>My defence was accepted, and I was then taken through the Vatican ratlines to join the core of the CIA with over 10,000 of my peaceful co-ideologues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ServosT</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam/comment-page-1/#comment-5352777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ServosT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=214433#comment-5352777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Islam has brought nothing but poverty and ignorance to the world.  And piracy and slavery.  And terrorism and  backwardness. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Islam has brought nothing but poverty and ignorance to the world.  And piracy and slavery.  And terrorism and  backwardness. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Privat Privat</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam/comment-page-1/#comment-5351763</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Privat Privat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=214433#comment-5351763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think im useing the rasist card bit much, but you know what i mean.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think im useing the rasist card bit much, but you know what i mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Privat Privat</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam/comment-page-1/#comment-5351762</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Privat Privat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=214433#comment-5351762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[arnt you beeing rasist right now, how would you like it if People of Islam called you a fascist cult of atheists!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>arnt you beeing rasist right now, how would you like it if People of Islam called you a fascist cult of atheists!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josephherring</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam/comment-page-1/#comment-5351756</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[josephherring]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 13:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=214433#comment-5351756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hitler admired Mohammad. In fact, he wanted to use Islam to dominate the world. That just goes to show you how destructive Islam is. He also used Muslims during WWII. If you look at Jihads when they salute you will see it is the same as when they saluted Hitler.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitler admired Mohammad. In fact, he wanted to use Islam to dominate the world. That just goes to show you how destructive Islam is. He also used Muslims during WWII. If you look at Jihads when they salute you will see it is the same as when they saluted Hitler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PG</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam/comment-page-1/#comment-5351415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=214433#comment-5351415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the end, Muslims can&#039;t help but bring out the violent-punishment talk. They talk peace for a while, then they get nasty. It&#039;s so predictable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the end, Muslims can&#8217;t help but bring out the violent-punishment talk. They talk peace for a while, then they get nasty. It&#8217;s so predictable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clevs</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam/comment-page-1/#comment-5351405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clevs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=214433#comment-5351405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whatever you say hot shot.. ;) good luck in the afterlife. You and your AA class members can have this thread..haha. You will always believe you are right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever you say hot shot.. <img src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";)" class="wp-smiley" />  good luck in the afterlife. You and your AA class members can have this thread..haha. You will always believe you are right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clevs</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam/comment-page-1/#comment-5351392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clevs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 22:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=214433#comment-5351392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hitler was an atheist....... And jihad means spiritual struggle]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitler was an atheist&#8230;&#8230;. And jihad means spiritual struggle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veracious_one</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslim-terrorist-states-argue-over-which-of-them-is-distorting-islam/comment-page-1/#comment-5351379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Veracious_one]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=214433#comment-5351379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[in other words non-Muslims are just supposed to lie down and be ruthlessly slaughtered by rampaging Muslims...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in other words non-Muslims are just supposed to lie down and be ruthlessly slaughtered by rampaging Muslims&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 755/840 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-29 19:17:48 by W3 Total Cache -->