Muslims Refuse to Drive “Gay” Cabs

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. He is completing a book on the international challenges America faces in the 21st century.


sauditwocanplay2

Holder and Obama have sued companies for not accommodating Islam even while they’re pushing gay rights. So this case might have been the equivalent of forcing a computer to calculate the full value of Pi, or most likely it would have been ignored as a notoriously inconvenient truth about Islam’s place in the multicultural rainbow of diversity.

Naturally the same lefties going nuts over Mozilla will have nothing to say about this.

The protest centers around signs promoting the Gay Games that are on top of airport cabs.

Some drivers, for religious reasons, are refusing to drive the cabs. And we’re told these are predominantly drivers of the Muslim faith.

19 Action News reporter Brian Duffy spoke with about 20 cabbies at the airport who are still driving and all of them confirmed there are drivers who have walked off the job on protest.

The outcome will naturally make cab companies less likely to take advertising that may offend Muslims. Now it’s the Gay Games, tomorrow it’s an unveiled woman or a Christian ad.

Muslim settlers in the United States and Europe are imposing Islamic law in various ways. This is just one of them.

  • Normandy

    its fine-the bigoted muslims were fired

    • DogmaelJones1

      No, it isn’t fine. Next thing you know, companies that fire Muslims for their “religious beliefs” will be sued for discrimination or some trumped up “crime” and then cab companies will be afraid to discipline Muslims at all. Start small, go medium, then whole hog. That’s the Islamic strategy.

      • Brian_Joness

        Is that the evangelical Christian strategy too? They refuse to bake a cake for a gay person, then yell religious discrimination when they get sued. At least these cab drivers refused to drive the car, not the person. It would have been different if they continued driving straight people but refused service to gay people.

        • DogmaelJones1

          If a baker refuses to bake a cake for anyone who seeks his custom, his reason is irrelevant. It’s his product, his labor, and he can dispose of them to whomever he chooses. It’s the same for the florist and photographer who were also penalized for not wanting gay couples for customers. Whether or not they’re evangelical Christians, is irrelevant, as well. Either they own their lives and their businesses, or they don’t. The government and courts say they don’t. I can cite as a reason for not wanting someone’s business the color of his socks. It doesn’t matter.

          • Brian_Joness

            It certainly would’ve been a lot nicer if the baker or photographer simply said “I don’t like the color of your socks.” But instead they said what amounted to “I don’t like the color of your skin.” The states had anti-discrimination laws because of historical persecution, so they got sued. Blanket persecution of a minority that includes harmless and innocent individuals is not in the public interest.

          • Habbgun

            So by your logic these same cabbies should be sued because not having cabs available is not in the public interest. You’ll have the nerve to take on Jihad in one …. two…. three…..never.

          • Habbgun

            Nah….I would do as the bakers did. You know quite well they took a logical position. You may say the bible is not against homosexuality but in my own religion the Jewish faith the issue with marriage is holiness. To support a gay marriage is to say a marriage between gays is as holy as between a man and a woman. It is not so. The government can subsidize pork farmers if it wants but it can’t say pork is kosher.

            The same would hold between a Jew and a non-Jew. If I was in the Jewish marriage business I would not be a participant unless there was a proper conversion. For the government to intrude and say one marriage is the equal of another in the eyes of Hashem is an intrusion by the government. Don’t try you can construe the Bible line…yada….yada…Judaism has a clearly defined structure dating back thousands of years.

    • kasandra

      Where does it say they were fired?

    • laura r

      why? its just like not baking that wedding cake.

      • A Z

        People need taxis at airports. Taxis are heavily regulated.

        People do not need designer cakes or photographers.

        • laura r

          yes, i know that. but they already have refused blind people w/dogs. the owners of these cab comps are also muslim or 3rd world. they will win, the signs will be taken down. actually i think i like that!

          • A Z

            The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend.

            If the sign are taken down some gays may be given pause to to think about changing demographics, immigration, multi-culturalism and where their real problems lie.

            Some gays are not political opponents, they are enemies. Dan Savage is an example. He said he would like to grudge f___ some people to get back at them. that is sort of a political/religious statement or imperative coming from his mouth like when a Mullah issues a fatwah. Make a word blending of fatwah with what he wanted to do and that is exactly what he did.

    • A Z

      I would say leave the advertisements up. We can hold out own. i am just not keen on gay education in the schools and adoption.

      In about a generation barring world war or such, science will show that being gay is not such a bright ideal. Best thing will be to let the gays change and say no more.

      • Brian_Joness

        Gay people have been around in every generation that humans have existed as far as we can tell. They could never actually change their sexual orientation and there is no reason that they should. Could you change your sexual orientation tomorrow if you wanted to?

        • laura r

          they have been around since the beginning of the beginning. now they get a revivial.

          • Brian_Joness

            If by revival you mean that they are free from hiding, then long live the revival!

        • A Z

          “Gay people have been around in every generation that humans have existed as far as we can tell.”

          Babies have been born since the beginning of time with club feet, 2 heads, etc. I call those defects.

          Any complicated process such as the creation of life like a human being is bound to have defects.

          Defects are to be corrected.

          • Brian_Joness

            You probably think that being left handed is a defect. I don’t see a reason to correct either.

          • A Z

            I know a theory for right handedness. It has to do with the behaviour of schooling fish that wrap themselves in tight masses, balls, to confuse predators and avoid being eaten. I also know the theory/mechanism of why internal organs are asymmetrical and how this comes about.

            Still looking for theory on a gay gene, epi-genetics or hormones to be proven. Personally I have several theories. One is the confusion theory. I saw that in a college psyche book. We also see it in animals and insects. Are you confused? Another is that a number of gay people are beta males. The theories are not mutually exclusive. A 3rd theory is just that some of the gays are willful, hypersexual and they do it simply because it feels good and nothing is going to get in their way.

          • Brian_Joness

            Wow, all 3 of your theories are from the 70′s and all disproved. Gay people exist whether you feel it has been personally proven to you or not. I think it is just a natural variation that occurs in humans of every race, religion, or whatever. I don’t think it matters if we pinpoint the gene or hormonal differences. That would be interesting but what would it change?

          • Brian_Joness

            Wow, all 3 of your theories are from the 70′s and all disproved. Gay people exist whether you feel it has been personally proven to you or not. I think it is just a natural variation that occurs in humans of every race, religion, or whatever. I don’t think it matters if we pinpoint the gene or hormonal differences. That would be interesting but what would it change?

          • A Z

            Confusion theory was in an 80s textbook used at a public university.

            I don’t care what you think of the theories. What about theories that people like you love? Kinsey’s research was built on large part on prison populations. that would not be a representative sample of the whole population.

            “I don’t think it matters if we pinpoint the gene or hormonal differences. That would be interesting but what would it change?” Finally you get reduced to that argument. That is a choice. that is all well and good. Over time we can effect a divorce. Of course we can get a divorce. It is called freedom of association. Both sides have it.

            Have you seen the death spike of 25 to 45 year olds due to AIDS? It is important.We cannot assume that we will always obtain a a pill or a cure for every disease that comes down the pike. Are we suppose to drop everything and commit to a Manhattan style project to cure whatever bedevils the LGBTQ community next?

          • laura r

            being gay is biological not a choice. its not normal, but im ok w/that. they should live their lives & be left alone. some people will accept them others no. they cant force people to accept.

          • Softly Bob

            Left-handedness is completely harmless. It does not affect one’s ability to reproduce, nor does it lead to the spread of disease due to unhygienic sexual practices. Next you’ll be telling us that people like us don’t like people with brown eyes.
            Nice try, loser, but a complete fail!!!

          • Brian_Joness

            Left-handed people have lower life expectancy. They also have more accidents and a little harder life because everything is made for right-handed people.

            Brown eyes are the majority eye color. I am sure you love brown eyes. You probably aren’t too keen on green eyes, though.

            Gay people can certainly reproduce, they just have to do it intentionally or they can adopt children of straight people that did it unintentionally. At least gay people don’t lead to unwanted and abandoned babies.

          • A Z

            I have seen those studies saying they had lower life expectancy and then studies refuting them.

            Your point?

            “They also have more accidents ”
            Gee nowadays you can and they do engineer out any problems with machinery.

          • A Z

            I have seen those studies saying they had lower life expectancy and then studies refuting them.

            Your point?

            “They also have more accidents ”
            Gee nowadays you can and they do engineer out any problems with machinery.

          • Softly Bob

            Such twisted logic. So you clearly hate left-handed people, saying that we (yes, I’m left-handed) have more accidents and don’t live as long. That’s right, I’m a clumsy accident-prone buffoon just waiting to have a heart attack. My eyes are brown by the way, but of course I don’t really care what a person’s eye colour is.
            According to you, I must hate my wife though because hers are green.
            Gay people can reproduce, yes but not with each other (not the same gender anyway), and in case you didn’t realize, it actually takes two people to come together to reproduce. Maybe you believe that gay people can reproduce by masturbation!
            As for the statement that gay people don’t lead to abandoned or unwanted babies, well that’s the sort of Leftist response I would expect, the type of really dumb analogy that only libtards can come out with.
            As if that justifies Gays being allowed to adopt.
            You can apply that dumb logic to anything. Allow pedophiles to adopt because at least they don’t produce unwanted or abandoned children. Allow monkeys to adopt because they don’t produce unwanted or abandoned children. Hey why not allow my neutered Cocker spaniel to adopt because at least he doesn’t produce unwanted or abandoned puppies.
            You truly are clueless, no really you are, but if you want to go around changing the laws of nature and reinventing basic biology, then go ahead, just don’t be offended if I don’t join in with your crazy deluded fantasy.

          • Brian_Joness

            Ha, you really really didn’t get it. I was mirroring your own twisted logic. As ridiculous as you thought I sounded, is exactly how ridiculous your original post sounded.

            No, I don’t have anything against left-handed people and don’t think that you actually hate people with green eyes. You didn’t like me stereotyping left-handed people, did you? (I am laying it on pretty thick, I hope you get it this time)

            No, gay people should not be able to adopt because they are gay. They should be able to adopt because they are people. Of course they have to jump through all the hoops straight couples do before adoption.

          • Softly Bob

            No, they should not be allowed to adopt at all. That’s like saying that child-molesters should be allowed to adopt, not because they are child-molesters but because they are people.
            And there’s nothing twisted about my logic, my friend. I couldn’t care less about you stereotyping left-handed people. You brought the subject up first, not me. You’re the one who said to somebody “you probably think that left-handed people have a defect”.
            Really, where did that come from? So it’s a logical conclusion is it, that somebody who thinks that homosexuality is a defect also thinks that left-handedness is a defect?
            Nice little straw-man you inserted there and a typical cowardly Leftist response to accuse somebody of meaning something else other than what they said.
            And yes, I know that you’re not really prejudiced against left-handers – perhaps you just failed to realize that I was insulting your twisted logic.
            The truth is, your logic really is twisted and you can’t debate honestly without making assumptions and stretching things further. It’s just so sad that you’re too stupid to see that.

          • Brian_Joness

            The cognitive dissonance is strong in you. I am building straw men yet you are assigning characteristics to me of “a typical leftist,” whatever that means.

            Yes, I think being left-handed is just as much a ‘defect’ as being gay. I wouldn’t use that word though. A naturally occurring phenomena that happens in about the same percentage of humans no matter where in the world or what time period you look at.

            Imagine if people were as cruel to lefties as they are to gay people. They actually used to beat lefties because they thought left-handedness was a sign of the devil and associated all sorts of sinister behavior to lefties. You would have had to pretend to be right-handed and never let anyone know! You can’t tell a lefty just by looking at him so they can generally hide with the non-defective normal people. So much in common with gay people :)

            Lastly, Gay people are just as much like child molesters as left-handed people are like child molesters. ((No, I am not saying that left-handed people are child molesters, try to keep up.))

          • Softly Bob

            So,after your rant…. your point is?

          • A Z

            One can argue being left handed was adaptive if one was a knight defending a castle. At least in specific cases. Winding stair cases put right handers at a disadvantage.

          • laura r

            this is something that does not need to be corrected, i stand by that.

        • A Z

          How do you explain ex-gays?

          Not all of them could be lying.

        • laura r

          agree on that one.

          • A Z

            “they were bi. they may have gone tru a phase. some marry women but have occassional zex w/men. they get a different kind of thrill from it. some gay men could never ever be bi or sleep w/a woman”

            I am aware of the whole Kinsey scale theory. If Kinsey using the scientific method then the Kinsey scale is a theory.

            A different kind of thrill? It seems like narcissistic behaviour to me. That does not explain them it all, but it explains a portion of them. It think it especially explains one blogger who use to post here once in a blue moon who know posts at Truth Revolt frequently under is blog name.

          • laura r

            if you can sleep 2 sexes you are bi. if you are a bi man & choose a women, it may be that you lran thet way. OR you lean towards men, but dont want to into the gay lifestyle, or have a male partner. some gay men slept w/a women once & they found it repulsive. why should they suffer, let them be gay. on a personal level i dont get any of it, but then again- i am not the whole world.

          • laura r

            if you can sleep 2 sexes you are bi. if you are a bi man & choose a women, it may be that you lran thet way. OR you lean towards men, but dont want to into the gay lifestyle, or have a male partner. some gay men slept w/a women once & they found it repulsive. why should they suffer, let them be gay. on a personal level i dont get any of it, but then again- i am not the whole world.

          • A Z

            ” it may be that you lran thet way”

            ???

          • laura r

            re read typo corrected. btw, gay is gay. as long as theyre not bothering you, whats the big deal.

          • A Z

            Other than adoption & proselytizing in the schools?

          • laura r

            now that IS bothersome. otherwize, if they are quietly going about their business, its ok. none of the gay men i know would ever think about adoption or schools.

          • A Z

            There are quite a few activists out there.

          • A Z

            Occam’s razor

            If it feels good do it. They got their rocks off. Women are more like a car. You have to take care of them like anything that is worth having (including as grow older oneself). For a teenager or a 20 something that is a pain.

            I think libido pretty much covers a lot of it.

  • SouthofCincy

    Remember when ‘gay’ meant happy?

    • A Z

      In my case gay meant happy until about 1980 (give or take a year). Then I learned about gays.

      • laura r

        gay has been used for 50 years plus. nothing new, they just get lots of PR these days.

      • UCSPanther

        The old and “polite” term for a gay was “Confirmed Bachelor”…

  • laura r

    daniel, this is a good thing. i have made several comments about the gays support for muslims, & the muslims anti gay sharia. lets see who wins. the muslims will win bigtime, i predict. the gays will protest? maybe. that should be fun……..stir the diversity pot. watch the show.

    • Brian_Joness

      Why were you making several comments about “the gays” support for Muslims? Were you just trying to incite hatred of both groups? Islam has nothing to do with the gay rights movement and there is no reason to conflate the two. Only in your head does such an alliance exist. Pathetic.

      Both of them don’t like the prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination that you just showed with a vengeance, though. Lots of gay people don’t like Muslims and lots of Muslims love gay people. Can you even try to comprehend that?

      • laura r

        maybe some of this is true as you say. but the gays have not spoken out against muslims. lets see if they open their mouths about the ads. i hope so.

        • Brian_Joness

          What is the difference between a radical gay and a moderate gay? ((( just have to let you know that “gay” is not a noun)))

          Your logic just falls apart and you were trying such an easy proof!

          Gay has nothing to do with Islam except that the radical Right hates both of them. There are gay Muslims and there are gay people that hate Muslims and vice-versa. Not all minorities are the same, except in the eyes of the most vicious social conservatives.

          • laura r

            i am aware there are gay muslims. im from NY hello. there have been gays in islamic culture for 1000s of yrs. new? they need to watch their backs while in the old country. just read on spencers jihadwatch about the 2 gay activists who will not speak out about shira. they said some weird things. check it out. oh yes, radical gay is the gay militant- the gay police. the gays who spend all day suing for imagined insults. the gays who spend all day thinking about who may hate them. the gays who are in the face 24/7. the gays who want to be straight. gay is the new straight! bor-ing. who would ever think……

          • Brian_Joness

            That is a figment of your imagination.

          • Larry Larkin

            No, it’s to do with their definition of “gay”. In arabic cultures if you are sticking it to a boy or young man, you are not a homosexual, just exercising your privileges as a man to stick into anything you want.
            If you are the boy or young man getting it stuck into you, it’s merely your lot in life to be the receptacle of an older, more powerful man.
            It’s only if you like it that you are a homosexual. You see the same thing all around the Mediterranean in areas that were formerly muslim ruled.

          • Brian_Joness

            Yeah, that is really what all the Bible versus are about that people think condemn homosexuality. It is more a power and rape thing by heterosexuals that was being condemned.

          • laura r

            if the boy dosnt have pubic hair its ok. in SA if both older men are married w/children its ok. they get around it there. they are much more free in NYC thats for sure!

          • Softly Bob

            Really, is that just your twisting of it or can you provide verses to prove it?

          • Brian_Joness

            You can prove anything you want with the Bible, which really means that you can’t prove anything. We’ve all heard people on opposing sides of an issue hurling Bible versus back and forth. All you have is your interpretation.

            I haven’t seen a verse that condemns gay people. Leviticus doesn’t apply to Christians and even if it does, it just calls “lying with a man” an abomination, which means nontraditional like shaving your beard (the death penalty was weirdly thrown in there in later versions of the Bible, it doesn’t really fit with the rest of the chapter does it?).

            Sodom & Gomorrah was definitely not a story about a loving monogamous gay couple. Men STARTED to lust for other men and women did the same. This was showing hedonism. I guess the gay men might have STARTED lusting for women in that situation. Also the townspeople wanted to rape Lot’s visitors. That wasn’t about love or attraction, that was about power and violence. The term sodomy should refer to being violent or hedonistic or unwelcoming of strangers. Instead the term has been used to shame people and persecute a minority.

            There are other passages that people cite but pretty much they are all covered by what I said above. He never talks disparagingly about David’s love for Jonathan or Naomi and Ruth or the centurion’s male lover that Jesus healed of illness (he didn’t try to ‘heal’ his homosexuality, which I think is telling).

            I think people just keep mindlessly repeating that the Bible condemns being gay, when in fact the Bible never really judges anyone for being gay and even seems to cherish a few gay love stories.

          • Softly Bob

            That’s fair enough, but I’ve never condemned homosexuals anyway. I condemn the promotion of it (ie gay marriage, marriage is a CELEBRATION of the unity of a man and a woman) and I condemn gay adoption because it is wrong. I also condemn the belief that homosexuality is congenital, it is not.
            I don’t hate gays, I don’t think they should be locked up or persecuted and I don’t think that they shouldn’t be allowed to have jobs nor should they live their lives under persecution. The Bible makes it clear that homosexuality is an abomination to the Lord, but I’m sure he forgives them, maybe he even allows them to live their lives as they do (Paul said that love covers a multitude of sins) but homosexuality is not God’s way – the plumbing is wrong and homosexuals are a defect in his design.
            I don’t agree with you about the power and rape thing, I think that homosexuality is not just about that. Christians should never endorse homosexuality, idolize it or claim that it is anything special. It’s a defect in the same way that any other psychological disorder is.
            But can Christians tolerate it or accept it? Maybe, but they should never promote or make special allowances for it. Gays should not be allowed to adopt kids in the same way that blind men should not be allowed to drive cars. Homosexuality is not a blessing, it is a cross to bear. It is not normal (common maybe but not normal) and homosexuals need to face the reality that they cannot change biology or nature.
            What about gays who already have kids?
            Let them keep them. There’s no point breaking up a bond that’s already there.
            But should gay adoption be allowed in the future? No, I don’t think so. It’s wrong, it’s unnatural and nobody is entitled to kids. It’s not an entitlement, it’s a privilege. Gays have no right to adopt kids any more than an unemployed single man is, or an alcoholic or somebody with a criminal record.
            I’m tired of Leftist manipulation and comparisons with things that are irrelevant. Saying that gays can adopt just because there are heterosexuals that abuse kids or have unwanted kids is no more relevant than saying that I have a right to be POTUS just because a few Presidents have been utterly useless.
            This moral relativism has got to stop. It’s insane, it’s twisted and it is not right.

          • laura r

            gays want to push the envelope. (the radical police i mean). they want more & more, like very so called victim group. check it out, even noah from huff post said that.

          • suesista

            I’m getting the distinct impression you don’t like “the gay.”

          • laura r

            a paticular kind of gay. the same kind of paticular person who could be straight. its “that kind” of person. the gay militants are vicious.

          • Lea

            You can’t be a gay muslim. You can be a gay muslim apostate. The truth is that gays are the minority, just like the muslims are. This is their common denominator, which has morphed into the gays taking up the ancient muslim hatred for Jews and Israel. And since the minority gays and muslims are using lawfare to impose their way of life on the majority, this is also sincerely and abundantly anti democratic. The very reason why America is going down the tubes rapidly, and turning into a muslim dhimmi state.

          • Brian_Joness

            Of course you can be a gay Muslim, just like you can be a gay Christian, and YES even a gay Jew. Why are you now deciding that gay people hate Jews and Israel? That makes no sense. Do gay Jews hate themselves and Israel? Israel just erected a monument to the gay people that were killed by the Nazis during the Holocaust.

            Gay people aren’t forcing their way of life on straight people. Have you heard of any instance where a straight person was forced to marry someone of the same gender in this country? No, gay people are just living their lives and want the same protections that straight people get. Some straight people are going out of their way to mess with the personal lives of all gay people. Most straight people agree that gay people should have equal protection under the law.

        • Lea

          Muslims are part of the left in America. In Ukraine they are part of the right. Odd hey, how they seem to go with the section of people who are most accommodating to them.
          The place where you see the dhimmihood of the gays to the muslims is in the gay support of their Jew/Israel hatred. In this forum the gays are helping the Muslims to further their aims to destroy Israel.
          Just like the feminists are paralysed and flattered by Islam, so it seems the gays are too. Instead they are being used as useful idiots in the expansion of sharia islam, which is going to turn around and behead them, after prolonged torture.

      • kikorikid

        And even more Islamist want to behead or hang them.
        Homos m/f, are delusional in thinking their universal
        demand for tolerance is even a consideration in Islam.
        Islam will give both m/f homos the same thing: Endless
        rape and then a cut throat. Heteros will be disinclined
        to save them because they, Gays, have offered nothing
        but vitriol and hate.

        • Brian_Joness

          No gay people think that radical Muslims like them. What is wrong with you people.

          • Anukem Jihadi

            something in the head

      • Lea

        Take a look at this:

        http://www.barenakedislam.com/2010/04/25/queers-against-the-only-country-in-the-middle-east-that-allows-them-to-live-freely-and-openly/
        and then take a look at this:

        http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/03/30/muslim-calls-ny1-a-nyc-tv-news-station-to-say-we-believe-all-homosexuals-should-be-beheaded/
        This must be the most diabolical, and also the dumbest expression of enslavement to Muslims in America. Gays just cannot be sane when they support the expansion of Islam and destruction of Israel. Furthermore, the muslims are laughing at them and celebrating their idiocy. Americans are just stupid really. They even have a Muslim as a President, that’s how liberally self destructive they are.

        • Brian_Joness

          At first I was thinking “which gays are you talking about?!?” Then you said the thing about Obama being Muslim and realized that you are either crazy or a troll.

          • Drakken

            Your denial of reality really says it all I used to sympathy and empathy for you people, now I am all out, for you openly side with those who will kill you in the long run.

          • Lea

            Really? And you must be someone of low or no info. Obama was raised as a muslim. A lot of muslims are closet gays, very few are open about it. Obama may not be a pious muslim but he definitely is furthering the Islamist agenda to take over the White House. He is even using American money and military to do so too. Nothing is what it seems. Americans are becoming a pitiful bunch as they submit to Marxist Islam. Is it perhaps that they are mind controlled, maybe the HAARP thing? This constant denial, denial, denial of the FACTS by Americans is astounding. Even Egypt sees Americans as the enemy now because of Obamas policies and aide to the Muslim Brotherhood and the support of the Islamist psychopaths in Syria and Libya doing this to innocent people: http://www.barenakedislam.com/?s=syria
            It appears that the Marxist Masons have promised to aide Islam in wiping out all other religions and to incite war. The bargain probably is that they get to be the NWO religion.

          • suesista

            Obama was “raised as a Muslim?” And furthermore is probably a “closet gay” who is furthering the Islamist agenda to take over the White House, using “Marxist Islam?” For a minute you had me there, thinking you were serious. Good one!!!

      • Drakken

        Listen very closely peter puffer, you gay folks bitch and whine about us European/American Western Civilization heterosexuals all the time, because we are not going to kill you or persecute you. The muslims on the other hand will kill you and do all sorts of nasty things to you, where is your bravery now in the face of persecution and oppression? Fu**ing cowards, you only go after easy targets.

    • suesista

      As a lefty, I admit I’m unaware of any concerted gay support of Muslims, though I wouldn’t be surprised if the gay community was generally supportive of diversity. I’ll go on record here to say I don’t support the cabbies’ walk-off, but also disagree with the conclusion in the article that Muslims are ‘imposing Islamic law’ as they settle in America. A cadre of taxi-drivers does not an imposition make. I don’t know many on the left who would support these drivers, and neither would most of my rightie friends. The businessmen among them know that it’s bad for profit, for one thing…just ask Phil Robertson.

      • laura r

        theres much more sharia requests than cab driving. see pam geller blog. in NY & much of the US muslims drive cabs. we need cabs. what brings more profit? the taxie service or the ads? the muslims may win, & yes it will be a business decision. you are right on that one. as for all thier other nonsence, they are catered too out of fear. we may be 20yrs behind the UK but catching up.

  • A Z

    “Muslim settlers in the United States and Europe are imposing Islamic law in various ways.”

    “Sweden: Muslims set up homemade traffic control, stop cars, set up roadblocks, police do nothing”

    http://pamelageller.com/2014/04/sweden-muslims-set-homemade-traffic-control-stop-cars-set-roadblocks-police-nothing.html/

    When Muslims did this at the beginning if the Lebanon Civil War they identified and killed Christian motorists.

    In Syria both sides are doing this except they have included Muslims of the wrong persuasion. Now the Assad regime is not killing Christians via checkpoints but all the rest of the statement stands.

    We need Muslims why?

  • UCSPanther

    So, how do you want your crow, Progressives?

    Baked? Fried? Barbequed? Raw? You better make a choice, because you’ll be eating a lot of it in the coming decades…

  • Josh Weinstein

    If I owned the cab companies, I would fire them in a heartbeat. How can you run a business where your employees can pick and choose which customers (or advertising) is acceptable? This isn’t so much a gay rights versus religious rights issue – it is an employer/employee issue.

  • Jeff Noncent

    I was wondering what the president is going to say about these since he is a Muslim and a closet homosexual

  • Bramble

    I am an evangelical Christian. I would not drive a cab with a ‘gay’ ad. I would not bake a cake for a gay wedding. If I owned the cab company I would refuse to take the ad. Christians are being taken to court for such actions based on beliefs. Will the moslems be taken to court?

    • Lea

      Because of gays, individual freedoms are disappearing, and the muslims are walking in their lawfare footsteps, making it happen faster.

  • Follow @offensivedialog

    You know, reading some of these posts gives the impression that white people are sick in the head and natural liars. But reflecting on history, it’s actually only a minority of white people but they have the biggest mouths. Why do ppl who claim such pride make their own race seem so ignorant?

  • Borneo Don

    If the cabbies weren’t Moslem, it would be a much bigger story…..