<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Muslims Refuse to Drive &#8220;Gay&#8221; Cabs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 17:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Habbgun</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs/comment-page-1/#comment-5403531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Habbgun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223672#comment-5403531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nah....I would do as the bakers did. You know quite well they took a logical position. You may say the bible is not against homosexuality but in my own religion the Jewish faith the issue with marriage is holiness. To support a gay marriage is to say a marriage between gays is as holy as between a man and a woman. It is not so. The government can subsidize pork farmers if it wants but it can&#039;t say pork is kosher.

The same would hold between a Jew and a non-Jew. If I was in the Jewish marriage business I would not be a participant unless there was a proper conversion. For the government to intrude and say one marriage is the equal of another in the eyes of Hashem is an intrusion by the government. Don&#039;t try you can construe the Bible line...yada....yada...Judaism has a clearly defined structure dating back thousands of years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah&#8230;.I would do as the bakers did. You know quite well they took a logical position. You may say the bible is not against homosexuality but in my own religion the Jewish faith the issue with marriage is holiness. To support a gay marriage is to say a marriage between gays is as holy as between a man and a woman. It is not so. The government can subsidize pork farmers if it wants but it can&#8217;t say pork is kosher.</p>
<p>The same would hold between a Jew and a non-Jew. If I was in the Jewish marriage business I would not be a participant unless there was a proper conversion. For the government to intrude and say one marriage is the equal of another in the eyes of Hashem is an intrusion by the government. Don&#8217;t try you can construe the Bible line&#8230;yada&#8230;.yada&#8230;Judaism has a clearly defined structure dating back thousands of years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Habbgun</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs/comment-page-1/#comment-5403528</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Habbgun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223672#comment-5403528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So by your logic these same cabbies should be sued because not having cabs available is not in the public interest. You&#039;ll have the nerve to take on Jihad in one .... two.... three.....never.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So by your logic these same cabbies should be sued because not having cabs available is not in the public interest. You&#8217;ll have the nerve to take on Jihad in one &#8230;. two&#8230;. three&#8230;..never.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Borneo Don</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs/comment-page-1/#comment-5403282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Borneo Don]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223672#comment-5403282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the cabbies weren&#039;t Moslem, it would be a much bigger story.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the cabbies weren&#8217;t Moslem, it would be a much bigger story&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Follow @offensivedialog</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs/comment-page-1/#comment-5403159</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Follow @offensivedialog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223672#comment-5403159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know, reading some of these posts gives the impression that white people are sick in the head and natural liars.  But reflecting on history, it&#039;s actually only a minority of white people but they have the biggest mouths.  Why do ppl who claim such pride make their own race seem so ignorant?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, reading some of these posts gives the impression that white people are sick in the head and natural liars.  But reflecting on history, it&#8217;s actually only a minority of white people but they have the biggest mouths.  Why do ppl who claim such pride make their own race seem so ignorant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anukem Jihadi</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs/comment-page-1/#comment-5403055</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anukem Jihadi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 01:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223672#comment-5403055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[something in the head
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>something in the head</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lea</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs/comment-page-1/#comment-5402874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223672#comment-5402874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because of gays, individual freedoms are disappearing, and the muslims are walking in their lawfare footsteps, making it happen faster.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because of gays, individual freedoms are disappearing, and the muslims are walking in their lawfare footsteps, making it happen faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laura r</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs/comment-page-1/#comment-5402577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laura r]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 05:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223672#comment-5402577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a paticular kind of gay. the same kind of paticular person who could be straight. its &quot;that kind&quot; of person. the gay  militants are vicious.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a paticular kind of gay. the same kind of paticular person who could be straight. its &#8220;that kind&#8221; of person. the gay  militants are vicious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suesista</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs/comment-page-1/#comment-5402569</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[suesista]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 05:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223672#comment-5402569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m getting the distinct impression you don&#039;t like &quot;the gay.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m getting the distinct impression you don&#8217;t like &#8220;the gay.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suesista</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs/comment-page-1/#comment-5402567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[suesista]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 05:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223672#comment-5402567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama was &quot;raised as a Muslim?&quot; And furthermore is probably a &quot;closet gay&quot; who is furthering the Islamist agenda to take over the White House, using &quot;Marxist Islam?&quot; For a minute you had me there, thinking you were serious.  Good one!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama was &#8220;raised as a Muslim?&#8221; And furthermore is probably a &#8220;closet gay&#8221; who is furthering the Islamist agenda to take over the White House, using &#8220;Marxist Islam?&#8221; For a minute you had me there, thinking you were serious.  Good one!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laura r</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs/comment-page-1/#comment-5402552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laura r]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 04:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223672#comment-5402552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[theres much more sharia requests than cab driving. see pam geller blog. in NY &amp; much of the US muslims drive cabs. we need cabs. what brings more profit? the taxie service or the ads? the muslims may win, &amp; yes it will be a business decision. you are right on that one. as for all thier other nonsence, they are catered too out of fear. we may be 20yrs behind the UK but catching up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>theres much more sharia requests than cab driving. see pam geller blog. in NY &amp; much of the US muslims drive cabs. we need cabs. what brings more profit? the taxie service or the ads? the muslims may win, &amp; yes it will be a business decision. you are right on that one. as for all thier other nonsence, they are catered too out of fear. we may be 20yrs behind the UK but catching up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suesista</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs/comment-page-1/#comment-5402531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[suesista]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 02:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223672#comment-5402531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a lefty, I admit I&#039;m unaware of any concerted gay support of Muslims, though I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if the gay community was generally supportive of diversity. I&#039;ll go on record here to say I don&#039;t support the cabbies&#039; walk-off, but also disagree with the conclusion in the article that Muslims are &#039;imposing Islamic law&#039; as they settle in America. A cadre of taxi-drivers does not an imposition make. I don&#039;t know many on the left who would support these drivers, and neither would most of my rightie friends. The businessmen among them know that it&#039;s bad for profit, for one thing...just ask Phil Robertson.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a lefty, I admit I&#8217;m unaware of any concerted gay support of Muslims, though I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if the gay community was generally supportive of diversity. I&#8217;ll go on record here to say I don&#8217;t support the cabbies&#8217; walk-off, but also disagree with the conclusion in the article that Muslims are &#8216;imposing Islamic law&#8217; as they settle in America. A cadre of taxi-drivers does not an imposition make. I don&#8217;t know many on the left who would support these drivers, and neither would most of my rightie friends. The businessmen among them know that it&#8217;s bad for profit, for one thing&#8230;just ask Phil Robertson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Softly Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs/comment-page-1/#comment-5402445</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Softly Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223672#comment-5402445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s fair enough, but I&#039;ve never condemned homosexuals anyway. I condemn the promotion of it (ie gay marriage, marriage is a CELEBRATION of the unity of a man and a woman) and I condemn gay adoption because it is wrong. I also condemn the belief that homosexuality is congenital, it is not.
I don&#039;t hate gays, I don&#039;t think they should be locked up or persecuted and I don&#039;t think that they shouldn&#039;t be allowed to have jobs nor should they live their lives under persecution. The Bible makes it clear that homosexuality is an abomination to the Lord, but I&#039;m sure he forgives them, maybe he even allows them to live their lives as they do (Paul said that love covers a multitude of sins) but homosexuality is not God&#039;s way - the plumbing is wrong and homosexuals are a defect in his design.
I don&#039;t agree with you about the power and rape thing, I think that homosexuality is not just about that. Christians should never endorse homosexuality, idolize it or claim that it is anything special. It&#039;s a defect in the same way that any other psychological disorder is.
But can Christians tolerate it or accept it? Maybe, but they should never promote or make special allowances for it. Gays should not be allowed to adopt kids in the same way that blind men should not be allowed to drive cars. Homosexuality is not a blessing, it is a cross to bear. It is not normal (common maybe but not normal) and homosexuals need to face the reality that they cannot change biology or nature.
What about gays who already have kids?
Let them keep them. There&#039;s no point breaking up a bond that&#039;s already there.
But should gay adoption be allowed in the future? No, I don&#039;t think so. It&#039;s wrong, it&#039;s unnatural and nobody is entitled to kids. It&#039;s not an entitlement, it&#039;s a privilege. Gays have no right to adopt kids any more than an unemployed single man is, or an alcoholic or somebody with a criminal record.
I&#039;m tired of Leftist manipulation and comparisons with things that are irrelevant. Saying that gays can adopt just because there are heterosexuals that abuse kids or have unwanted kids is no more relevant than saying that I have a right to be POTUS just because a few Presidents have been utterly useless. 
This moral relativism has got to stop. It&#039;s insane, it&#039;s twisted and it is not right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s fair enough, but I&#8217;ve never condemned homosexuals anyway. I condemn the promotion of it (ie gay marriage, marriage is a CELEBRATION of the unity of a man and a woman) and I condemn gay adoption because it is wrong. I also condemn the belief that homosexuality is congenital, it is not.<br />
I don&#8217;t hate gays, I don&#8217;t think they should be locked up or persecuted and I don&#8217;t think that they shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to have jobs nor should they live their lives under persecution. The Bible makes it clear that homosexuality is an abomination to the Lord, but I&#8217;m sure he forgives them, maybe he even allows them to live their lives as they do (Paul said that love covers a multitude of sins) but homosexuality is not God&#8217;s way &#8211; the plumbing is wrong and homosexuals are a defect in his design.<br />
I don&#8217;t agree with you about the power and rape thing, I think that homosexuality is not just about that. Christians should never endorse homosexuality, idolize it or claim that it is anything special. It&#8217;s a defect in the same way that any other psychological disorder is.<br />
But can Christians tolerate it or accept it? Maybe, but they should never promote or make special allowances for it. Gays should not be allowed to adopt kids in the same way that blind men should not be allowed to drive cars. Homosexuality is not a blessing, it is a cross to bear. It is not normal (common maybe but not normal) and homosexuals need to face the reality that they cannot change biology or nature.<br />
What about gays who already have kids?<br />
Let them keep them. There&#8217;s no point breaking up a bond that&#8217;s already there.<br />
But should gay adoption be allowed in the future? No, I don&#8217;t think so. It&#8217;s wrong, it&#8217;s unnatural and nobody is entitled to kids. It&#8217;s not an entitlement, it&#8217;s a privilege. Gays have no right to adopt kids any more than an unemployed single man is, or an alcoholic or somebody with a criminal record.<br />
I&#8217;m tired of Leftist manipulation and comparisons with things that are irrelevant. Saying that gays can adopt just because there are heterosexuals that abuse kids or have unwanted kids is no more relevant than saying that I have a right to be POTUS just because a few Presidents have been utterly useless.<br />
This moral relativism has got to stop. It&#8217;s insane, it&#8217;s twisted and it is not right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Softly Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs/comment-page-1/#comment-5402437</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Softly Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223672#comment-5402437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So,after your rant.... your point is?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So,after your rant&#8230;. your point is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian_Joness</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs/comment-page-1/#comment-5402403</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian_Joness]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223672#comment-5402403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can prove anything you want with the Bible, which really means that you can&#039;t prove anything.  We&#039;ve all heard people on opposing sides of an issue hurling Bible versus back and forth.  All you have is your interpretation.


I haven&#039;t seen a verse that condemns gay people.  Leviticus doesn&#039;t apply to Christians and even if it does, it just calls &quot;lying with a man&quot; an abomination, which means nontraditional like shaving your beard (the death penalty was weirdly thrown in there in later versions of the Bible, it doesn&#039;t really fit with the rest of the chapter does it?).


Sodom &amp; Gomorrah was definitely not a story about a loving monogamous gay couple.  Men STARTED to lust for other men and women did the same.  This was showing hedonism.  I guess the gay men might have STARTED lusting for women in that situation.  Also the townspeople wanted to rape Lot&#039;s visitors.  That wasn&#039;t about love or attraction, that was about power and violence.  The term sodomy should refer to being violent or hedonistic or unwelcoming of strangers.  Instead the term has been used to shame people and persecute a minority.


There are other passages that people cite but pretty much they are all covered by what I said above.  He never talks disparagingly about David&#039;s love for Jonathan or Naomi and Ruth or the centurion&#039;s male lover that Jesus healed of illness (he didn&#039;t try to &#039;heal&#039; his homosexuality, which I think is telling).


I think people just keep mindlessly repeating that the Bible condemns being gay, when in fact the Bible never really judges anyone for being gay and even seems to cherish a few gay love stories.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can prove anything you want with the Bible, which really means that you can&#8217;t prove anything.  We&#8217;ve all heard people on opposing sides of an issue hurling Bible versus back and forth.  All you have is your interpretation.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t seen a verse that condemns gay people.  Leviticus doesn&#8217;t apply to Christians and even if it does, it just calls &#8220;lying with a man&#8221; an abomination, which means nontraditional like shaving your beard (the death penalty was weirdly thrown in there in later versions of the Bible, it doesn&#8217;t really fit with the rest of the chapter does it?).</p>
<p>Sodom &amp; Gomorrah was definitely not a story about a loving monogamous gay couple.  Men STARTED to lust for other men and women did the same.  This was showing hedonism.  I guess the gay men might have STARTED lusting for women in that situation.  Also the townspeople wanted to rape Lot&#8217;s visitors.  That wasn&#8217;t about love or attraction, that was about power and violence.  The term sodomy should refer to being violent or hedonistic or unwelcoming of strangers.  Instead the term has been used to shame people and persecute a minority.</p>
<p>There are other passages that people cite but pretty much they are all covered by what I said above.  He never talks disparagingly about David&#8217;s love for Jonathan or Naomi and Ruth or the centurion&#8217;s male lover that Jesus healed of illness (he didn&#8217;t try to &#8216;heal&#8217; his homosexuality, which I think is telling).</p>
<p>I think people just keep mindlessly repeating that the Bible condemns being gay, when in fact the Bible never really judges anyone for being gay and even seems to cherish a few gay love stories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian_Joness</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs/comment-page-1/#comment-5402373</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian_Joness]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 19:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223672#comment-5402373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cognitive dissonance is strong in you.  I am building straw men yet you are assigning characteristics to me of &quot;a typical leftist,&quot; whatever that means.  


Yes, I think being left-handed is just as much a &#039;defect&#039; as being gay.   I wouldn&#039;t use that word though.  A naturally occurring phenomena that happens in about the same percentage of humans no matter where in the world or what time period you look at.  


Imagine if people were as cruel to lefties as they are to gay people.  They actually used to beat lefties because they thought left-handedness was a sign of the devil and associated all sorts of sinister behavior to lefties.  You would have had to pretend to be right-handed and never let anyone know!  You can&#039;t tell a lefty just by looking at him so they can generally hide with the non-defective normal people.  So much in common with gay people :)


Lastly, Gay people are just as much like child molesters as left-handed people are like child molesters. ((No, I am not saying that left-handed people are child molesters, try to keep up.))]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cognitive dissonance is strong in you.  I am building straw men yet you are assigning characteristics to me of &#8220;a typical leftist,&#8221; whatever that means.  </p>
<p>Yes, I think being left-handed is just as much a &#8216;defect&#8217; as being gay.   I wouldn&#8217;t use that word though.  A naturally occurring phenomena that happens in about the same percentage of humans no matter where in the world or what time period you look at.  </p>
<p>Imagine if people were as cruel to lefties as they are to gay people.  They actually used to beat lefties because they thought left-handedness was a sign of the devil and associated all sorts of sinister behavior to lefties.  You would have had to pretend to be right-handed and never let anyone know!  You can&#8217;t tell a lefty just by looking at him so they can generally hide with the non-defective normal people.  So much in common with gay people <img src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
<p>Lastly, Gay people are just as much like child molesters as left-handed people are like child molesters. ((No, I am not saying that left-handed people are child molesters, try to keep up.))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Softly Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs/comment-page-1/#comment-5402355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Softly Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223672#comment-5402355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really, is that just your twisting of it or can you provide verses to prove it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, is that just your twisting of it or can you provide verses to prove it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Softly Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs/comment-page-1/#comment-5402354</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Softly Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223672#comment-5402354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, they should not be allowed to adopt at all. That&#039;s like saying that child-molesters should be allowed to adopt, not because they are child-molesters but because they are people.
And there&#039;s nothing twisted about my logic, my friend. I couldn&#039;t care less about you stereotyping left-handed people. You brought the subject up first, not me. You&#039;re the one who said to somebody &quot;you probably think that left-handed people have a defect&quot;.
Really, where did that come from? So it&#039;s a logical conclusion is it, that somebody who thinks that homosexuality is a defect also thinks that left-handedness is a defect?
 Nice little straw-man you inserted there and a typical cowardly Leftist response to accuse somebody of meaning something else other than what they said.
And yes, I know that you&#039;re not really prejudiced against left-handers - perhaps you just failed to realize that I was insulting your twisted logic.
The truth is, your logic really is twisted and you can&#039;t debate honestly without making assumptions and stretching things further. It&#039;s just so sad that you&#039;re too stupid to see that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, they should not be allowed to adopt at all. That&#8217;s like saying that child-molesters should be allowed to adopt, not because they are child-molesters but because they are people.<br />
And there&#8217;s nothing twisted about my logic, my friend. I couldn&#8217;t care less about you stereotyping left-handed people. You brought the subject up first, not me. You&#8217;re the one who said to somebody &#8220;you probably think that left-handed people have a defect&#8221;.<br />
Really, where did that come from? So it&#8217;s a logical conclusion is it, that somebody who thinks that homosexuality is a defect also thinks that left-handedness is a defect?<br />
 Nice little straw-man you inserted there and a typical cowardly Leftist response to accuse somebody of meaning something else other than what they said.<br />
And yes, I know that you&#8217;re not really prejudiced against left-handers &#8211; perhaps you just failed to realize that I was insulting your twisted logic.<br />
The truth is, your logic really is twisted and you can&#8217;t debate honestly without making assumptions and stretching things further. It&#8217;s just so sad that you&#8217;re too stupid to see that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian_Joness</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs/comment-page-1/#comment-5402331</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian_Joness]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223672#comment-5402331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ha, you really really didn&#039;t get it.  I was mirroring your own twisted logic.  As ridiculous as you thought I sounded, is exactly how ridiculous your original post sounded.


No, I don&#039;t have anything against left-handed people and don&#039;t think that you actually hate people with green eyes.  You didn&#039;t like me stereotyping left-handed people, did you?  (I am laying it on pretty thick, I hope you get it this time)


No, gay people should not be able to adopt because they are gay.  They should be able to adopt because they are people.  Of course they have to jump through all the hoops straight couples do before adoption.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, you really really didn&#8217;t get it.  I was mirroring your own twisted logic.  As ridiculous as you thought I sounded, is exactly how ridiculous your original post sounded.</p>
<p>No, I don&#8217;t have anything against left-handed people and don&#8217;t think that you actually hate people with green eyes.  You didn&#8217;t like me stereotyping left-handed people, did you?  (I am laying it on pretty thick, I hope you get it this time)</p>
<p>No, gay people should not be able to adopt because they are gay.  They should be able to adopt because they are people.  Of course they have to jump through all the hoops straight couples do before adoption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Softly Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs/comment-page-1/#comment-5402249</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Softly Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223672#comment-5402249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Such twisted logic. So you clearly hate left-handed people, saying that we (yes, I&#039;m left-handed) have more accidents and don&#039;t live as long. That&#039;s right, I&#039;m a clumsy accident-prone buffoon just waiting to have a heart attack. My eyes are brown by the way, but of course I don&#039;t really care what a person&#039;s eye colour is. 
According to you, I must hate my wife though because hers are green.
Gay people can reproduce, yes but not with each other (not the same gender anyway), and in case you didn&#039;t realize, it actually takes two people to come together to reproduce. Maybe you believe that gay people can reproduce by masturbation!
As for the statement that gay people don&#039;t lead to abandoned or unwanted babies, well that&#039;s the sort of Leftist response I would expect, the type of really dumb analogy that only libtards can come out with.
As if that justifies Gays being allowed to adopt. 
You can apply that dumb logic to anything. Allow pedophiles to adopt because at least they don&#039;t produce unwanted or abandoned children. Allow monkeys to adopt because they don&#039;t produce unwanted or abandoned children. Hey why not allow my neutered Cocker spaniel to adopt because at least he doesn&#039;t produce unwanted or abandoned puppies.
You truly are clueless, no really you are, but if you want to go around changing the laws of nature and reinventing basic biology, then go ahead, just don&#039;t be offended if I don&#039;t join in with your crazy deluded fantasy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such twisted logic. So you clearly hate left-handed people, saying that we (yes, I&#8217;m left-handed) have more accidents and don&#8217;t live as long. That&#8217;s right, I&#8217;m a clumsy accident-prone buffoon just waiting to have a heart attack. My eyes are brown by the way, but of course I don&#8217;t really care what a person&#8217;s eye colour is.<br />
According to you, I must hate my wife though because hers are green.<br />
Gay people can reproduce, yes but not with each other (not the same gender anyway), and in case you didn&#8217;t realize, it actually takes two people to come together to reproduce. Maybe you believe that gay people can reproduce by masturbation!<br />
As for the statement that gay people don&#8217;t lead to abandoned or unwanted babies, well that&#8217;s the sort of Leftist response I would expect, the type of really dumb analogy that only libtards can come out with.<br />
As if that justifies Gays being allowed to adopt.<br />
You can apply that dumb logic to anything. Allow pedophiles to adopt because at least they don&#8217;t produce unwanted or abandoned children. Allow monkeys to adopt because they don&#8217;t produce unwanted or abandoned children. Hey why not allow my neutered Cocker spaniel to adopt because at least he doesn&#8217;t produce unwanted or abandoned puppies.<br />
You truly are clueless, no really you are, but if you want to go around changing the laws of nature and reinventing basic biology, then go ahead, just don&#8217;t be offended if I don&#8217;t join in with your crazy deluded fantasy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Z</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/muslims-refuse-to-drive-gay-cabs/comment-page-1/#comment-5402226</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Z]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 14:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223672#comment-5402226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have seen those studies saying they had lower life expectancy and then studies refuting them.

Your point?

&quot;They also have more accidents &quot;
Gee nowadays you can and they do engineer out any problems with machinery.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen those studies saying they had lower life expectancy and then studies refuting them.</p>
<p>Your point?</p>
<p>&#8220;They also have more accidents &#8221;<br />
Gee nowadays you can and they do engineer out any problems with machinery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 773/842 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-29 12:35:22 by W3 Total Cache -->