<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times Still Clueless About Putin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/new-york-times-still-clueless-about-putin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/new-york-times-still-clueless-about-putin/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-york-times-still-clueless-about-putin</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 02:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: NoToSocialism</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/new-york-times-still-clueless-about-putin/comment-page-1/#comment-5382152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NoToSocialism]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220620#comment-5382152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[of course the invasion of Crimea was done hastily, but of course it was planned well ahead - the protests in Kiev forced Putin to quickly occupy the only territory that could remain under his influence - Crimea - once the Ukraine becomes part of the European Union and NATO.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course the invasion of Crimea was done hastily, but of course it was planned well ahead &#8211; the protests in Kiev forced Putin to quickly occupy the only territory that could remain under his influence &#8211; Crimea &#8211; once the Ukraine becomes part of the European Union and NATO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Now and then</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/new-york-times-still-clueless-about-putin/comment-page-1/#comment-5382137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Now and then]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 23:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220620#comment-5382137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps the NYT is trying to equate Putin with President Obama but as I&#039;ve previously said ... Putin has a black belt and Obama and his staff are the white belts]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the NYT is trying to equate Putin with President Obama but as I&#8217;ve previously said &#8230; Putin has a black belt and Obama and his staff are the white belts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/new-york-times-still-clueless-about-putin/comment-page-1/#comment-5382127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220620#comment-5382127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s getting harder and harder for them to get one lie to jive with another. They are doing their best to splice bad ideas and lies together to appear consistent and knowledgable.


Maybe Daniel is right. Maybe they&#039;re all drunk. They can&#039;t be feeling to good with their circulation shrinking faster than the snow today. It&#039;s 58 degrees here. We&#039;re delerious. We also have the flu, which may have something to do with the delerium, but at least it&#039;s warming up finally. Thank God for global warming!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s getting harder and harder for them to get one lie to jive with another. They are doing their best to splice bad ideas and lies together to appear consistent and knowledgable.</p>
<p>Maybe Daniel is right. Maybe they&#8217;re all drunk. They can&#8217;t be feeling to good with their circulation shrinking faster than the snow today. It&#8217;s 58 degrees here. We&#8217;re delerious. We also have the flu, which may have something to do with the delerium, but at least it&#8217;s warming up finally. Thank God for global warming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/new-york-times-still-clueless-about-putin/comment-page-1/#comment-5382126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220620#comment-5382126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Between John Kerry babbling that this isn’t the 19th century anymore and theNew York Times clinging to the popular leftist thesis that Putin was just angry at us, it’s time to ask whether anyone on the left should ever be allowed to discuss foreign policy again.&quot;

Hilarious and accurate.

&quot;So this was a policy years in the making… that Putin suddenly threw together because he was angry at America. Go home New York Times, you’re drunk.&quot;



More hilarious and accurate. The New York Times has turned itself into a punchline...with the help of Daniel Greenfield&#039;s accomodating wit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Between John Kerry babbling that this isn’t the 19th century anymore and theNew York Times clinging to the popular leftist thesis that Putin was just angry at us, it’s time to ask whether anyone on the left should ever be allowed to discuss foreign policy again.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hilarious and accurate.</p>
<p>&#8220;So this was a policy years in the making… that Putin suddenly threw together because he was angry at America. Go home New York Times, you’re drunk.&#8221;</p>
<p>More hilarious and accurate. The New York Times has turned itself into a punchline&#8230;with the help of Daniel Greenfield&#8217;s accomodating wit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erudite Mavin</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/new-york-times-still-clueless-about-putin/comment-page-1/#comment-5382115</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erudite Mavin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220620#comment-5382115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As John Bolton reminded all the other evening on FOX

Putin’s 2005 speech to Russians

Putin, a veteran of the Soviet spy agency called the KGB, made the comments Bolton cites in an April 2005 state of the nation address to the country’s top politicians and parliament. A version is available in English from the Kremlin archives. Putin’s words vary depending on the translation, but the idea remains the same.

From the Kremlin: 

&quot;Above all, we should acknowledge that the collapse of the Soviet Union was a major geopolitical disaster of the century. As for the Russian nation, it became a genuine drama. Tens of millions of our co-citizens and co-patriots found themselves outside Russian territory. Moreover, the epidemic of disintegration infected Russia itself.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As John Bolton reminded all the other evening on FOX</p>
<p>Putin’s 2005 speech to Russians</p>
<p>Putin, a veteran of the Soviet spy agency called the KGB, made the comments Bolton cites in an April 2005 state of the nation address to the country’s top politicians and parliament. A version is available in English from the Kremlin archives. Putin’s words vary depending on the translation, but the idea remains the same.</p>
<p>From the Kremlin: </p>
<p>&#8220;Above all, we should acknowledge that the collapse of the Soviet Union was a major geopolitical disaster of the century. As for the Russian nation, it became a genuine drama. Tens of millions of our co-citizens and co-patriots found themselves outside Russian territory. Moreover, the epidemic of disintegration infected Russia itself.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anukem Jihadi</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/new-york-times-still-clueless-about-putin/comment-page-1/#comment-5382109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anukem Jihadi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 21:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220620#comment-5382109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is simply well laid groundwork to more easily facilitate the acceptance  of the terms of surrender. Russia&#039;s not the only entity that makes long range plans. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is simply well laid groundwork to more easily facilitate the acceptance  of the terms of surrender. Russia&#8217;s not the only entity that makes long range plans. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Napier</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/new-york-times-still-clueless-about-putin/comment-page-1/#comment-5382101</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Napier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220620#comment-5382101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;a deep sense of betrayal and grievance, especially toward the United States and Europe&quot;
Agreed, this is nonsensical. Putin is a totalitarian and has expansionist plans. It&#039;s not the West&#039;s fault.
 
However,  the possibility  that the invasion of Crimea is an attempt to retain at least influence on some territory on the Black Sea before the Ukraine becomes part of NATO and the EU shouldn&#039;t be discounted. After all, the fights in Kiev were also about whether the Ukraine starts admission talk with the EU, which means that sooner or later it is going to be in NATO. Putin gets the Crimea, NATO gets the Ukraine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;a deep sense of betrayal and grievance, especially toward the United States and Europe&#8221;<br />
Agreed, this is nonsensical. Putin is a totalitarian and has expansionist plans. It&#8217;s not the West&#8217;s fault.</p>
<p>However,  the possibility  that the invasion of Crimea is an attempt to retain at least influence on some territory on the Black Sea before the Ukraine becomes part of NATO and the EU shouldn&#8217;t be discounted. After all, the fights in Kiev were also about whether the Ukraine starts admission talk with the EU, which means that sooner or later it is going to be in NATO. Putin gets the Crimea, NATO gets the Ukraine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gamal</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/new-york-times-still-clueless-about-putin/comment-page-1/#comment-5382094</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gamal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220620#comment-5382094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Russian Parliament authorized Putin to invade not only Crimea but all of the Ukraine.  The New York Times argument that it was just Putin shows blatant ignorance or worse.  The Russian invasion was very well done.  Not a shot was fired.  You can&#039;t pull something like that off unless you plan very carefully.  Most countries couldn&#039;t pull that off no matter how well they planned.  Part of the reason Russia could do that is that while Obama has been fighting global warming and the Tea Party while cutting money to our military, Russia has been building up its military.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Russian Parliament authorized Putin to invade not only Crimea but all of the Ukraine.  The New York Times argument that it was just Putin shows blatant ignorance or worse.  The Russian invasion was very well done.  Not a shot was fired.  You can&#8217;t pull something like that off unless you plan very carefully.  Most countries couldn&#8217;t pull that off no matter how well they planned.  Part of the reason Russia could do that is that while Obama has been fighting global warming and the Tea Party while cutting money to our military, Russia has been building up its military.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB1954</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/new-york-times-still-clueless-about-putin/comment-page-1/#comment-5381905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DB1954]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220620#comment-5381905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another fine example of Zero&#039;s post-modernist (read: lobotomized) foreign policies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another fine example of Zero&#8217;s post-modernist (read: lobotomized) foreign policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Z</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/new-york-times-still-clueless-about-putin/comment-page-1/#comment-5381891</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Z]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220620#comment-5381891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Agricola was recalled from Britain in 85, after an unusually long tenure as governor. Tacitus claims Domitian ordered his recall because Agricola&#039;s successes outshone the Emperor&#039;s own modest victories in Germany. The relationship between Agricola and the Emperor is unclear; on the one hand, Agricola was awarded triumphal decorations and a statue (the highest military honours apart from an actual triumph); on the other, Agricola never again held a civil or military post, in spite of his experience and renown. He was offered the governorship of the province of Africa, but declined it, whether due to ill health or (as Tacitus claims) the machinations of Domitian.&quot; - wiki

Domitian is generally regarded as a good emperor in the 1st half of his tenure.  In the last half of his tenure he was cranky &amp; suspicious.  

Putin is KGB. He is not suspicious and would not put the kebosh on someone enacting their own foreign policy?

Puh-leeeeease, NYT you ask too much.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Agricola was recalled from Britain in 85, after an unusually long tenure as governor. Tacitus claims Domitian ordered his recall because Agricola&#8217;s successes outshone the Emperor&#8217;s own modest victories in Germany. The relationship between Agricola and the Emperor is unclear; on the one hand, Agricola was awarded triumphal decorations and a statue (the highest military honours apart from an actual triumph); on the other, Agricola never again held a civil or military post, in spite of his experience and renown. He was offered the governorship of the province of Africa, but declined it, whether due to ill health or (as Tacitus claims) the machinations of Domitian.&#8221; &#8211; wiki</p>
<p>Domitian is generally regarded as a good emperor in the 1st half of his tenure.  In the last half of his tenure he was cranky &amp; suspicious.  </p>
<p>Putin is KGB. He is not suspicious and would not put the kebosh on someone enacting their own foreign policy?</p>
<p>Puh-leeeeease, NYT you ask too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Z</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/new-york-times-still-clueless-about-putin/comment-page-1/#comment-5381882</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Z]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220620#comment-5381882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gnaeus Julius Agricola defeated the Caledonians at the Battle of Mons Graupius.  Agricola could have made Scotland a Roman province. Three reasons are given for the Romans leaving.  First, it would have cost more to administer Scotland than any tax revenue generated. Second, Emperor Domitian need additional troops in the Rhine frontier due to disturbances there. Third, Domitian like many Emperors was jealous of overly popular generals.  This last point is as true today as it was in history.

So I reject the insipid, craven nabobs of the NYT nattering about Putin does not know what is going on in the Russian foreign policy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnaeus_Julius_Agricola]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gnaeus Julius Agricola defeated the Caledonians at the Battle of Mons Graupius.  Agricola could have made Scotland a Roman province. Three reasons are given for the Romans leaving.  First, it would have cost more to administer Scotland than any tax revenue generated. Second, Emperor Domitian need additional troops in the Rhine frontier due to disturbances there. Third, Domitian like many Emperors was jealous of overly popular generals.  This last point is as true today as it was in history.</p>
<p>So I reject the insipid, craven nabobs of the NYT nattering about Putin does not know what is going on in the Russian foreign policy.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnaeus_Julius_Agricola" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnaeus_Julius_Agricola</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 510/517 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-29 21:39:37 by W3 Total Cache -->