Non-Muslim University Chaplains Resign Over Special Treatment for Muslims

coexist-isis

I’m surprised it took this long to happen. Muslims have been demanding and getting privileged treatment at the expense of other religions in workplaces and schools for a while now. (via Vlad Tepes)

Western’s longest-serving chaplain, along with four of his colleagues, has resigned in protest over the recently announced move of the Chaplains’ Services offices and a dedicated Muslim prayer space in the University Community Centre.

Rev. Michael Bechard, Western’s Roman Catholic chaplain, submitted his resignation and those of Janet Loo, Annette Donovan Panchaud, Melissa Page Nichols and Maija Wilson from the UWO Chaplains’ Association, to University President Amit Chakma on Friday.

The University announced last week that the current Muslim prayer room in University College would be moved along with the Chaplains’ Services offices to one space in the basement of the UCC. In addition, the current multi-faith space in the UCC will no longer be used.

“I am uneasy with the fact that the university is providing a dedicated space to the Muslim community when such privileges are not being granted to any other body,” he said.

Rev. Karen Low, United Church Chaplain, said in an email that the chaplains were concerned with the allocation of space that was available for the entire community.

“With the current situation — a designated Muslim prayer space and no space available for the prayer and reflection needs of others — we are presented with an issue of justice and equality.”

Equality is against the Islamic religion. So is justice.

The whole point of Islam is to impose inferiority on other religions. That affirms the specialness of Muslims or Muslim privilege. So no they aren’t willing to share.

Bechard said the new space could be used in-between Muslim prayer times for students of other faiths to use.

Kado Zimmo, president of the Muslim Students’ Association, said the needs of the Muslim community mean they need a space specifically for them.

“It is difficult to share the space because there are certain regulations that need to be upheld within the prayer space.”

Bechard was also critical of the way the decision was reached. He said the only people at the table were the Muslim chaplain, another two chaplains, the Muslim Students’ Association and the University.

“Many of these meetings took place without the rest of the chaplains being drawn into the conversation or even informed of the meetings,” Bechard said. “And to be told [after the fact] by administration that there is no room for negotiation and there will be no more further conversation, I think, is nonsense.”

 

 

  • Seewetoldu

    This is what happens when you have a radical Muslim in the white house.

  • SoCalMike

    University=Left=Sellout=Betrayal.

    The Left has sold us out to Islam since the day BHO came into office.
    The first thing Leftist BHO did was release for publication the US Army Enhanced Interrogation Manuel in the Leftist NY Slime.

  • Dan Knight

    Thank you Daniel, Classic example of negotiation in ‘bad faith.’

  • Kinneddar

    This happened at the University of Western Ontario in London, Ontario. Ingrid Mattson, former president of ISNA, is a professor there. She recently barred non-Muslims from one of her courses that taught Muslims how to speak about Islam in public. One can’t help but wonder what exactly was taught in that course.

    In another article on this, the Muslim students stated that they need their very own space so that males and females can be separated in order to afford each gender “privacy” to pray. So here we see a modern, supposedly liberal university, providing prayer space to one group, aiding and abetting gender segregation in the process, while denying other religious groups any prayer space at all.

    • bob smith

      “. Ingrid Mattson, former president of ISNA”

      Little wonder that as one of Canada’s oldest and elitist university’s being associated with ISNA in spite of the Federal Government’s ruling that ISNA is guilty of aiding terrorism in Canada and has been stripped of their charitable tax status.

      Additionally, London Ontario is being overrun by Muslims and in fact is even producing known terrorists, openly.

      This is only going to get worse, sadly.

  • roccolore

    Muslims lecture on equality, yet demand special privileges.

    • Joe The Gentile

      Islamic equality is different. The Quran is pretty open about the fact that some are much, much, more equal than others……

  • Libslayer

    The education bubble is ready to burst.
    At what point do people decide that $40,000+ per year for an “education” that pushes sexual confusion, Anti-Americanism, fashionable jihadism, white privilege, Jew hatred, climate lunacy, and the entire panoply of dusty leftist claptrap, culminating in a worthless degree, unpayable student loans, and no job prospects – is just not worth it?

    • pupsncats

      When those wasting their money and time stop doing so.

      • MarilynA

        You have got it! Anyone can get a free education using the information in libraries and on the internet.

    • MarilynA

      You forgot “white guilt.” which blames white people for all the ills of the world when it was White Anglo Saxon Christians who created civilizations our of barbaric chaos that these modern day Barbarians are trying to reimpose on us.

    • http://libertyandculture.blogspot.com/ Jason P

      When employers stop looking at the piece of paper and demand reasoning ability and hard core knowledge. When I was a manager I gave written tests and hired regardless of degree. I got great hires that others overlooked.

    • malinse

      You forgot anti-Christian.

      • Libslayer

        That’s a given.

  • halevi

    Another step in the demise of the American university bubble. This bubble will pop and pop hard.

    • nopeacenow

      You wish. Leftists are in control of the universities. They love Islam because Islam is anti-Israel, anti-US and anti-West.

      • halevi

        Yes, they do dominate the universities, but internet learning has a good chance of putting a lot of modern universities out of business.

        • Erudite Mavin

          Will never happen especially with Public Schools from Kindergarten – 12 Grade over the decades have been on a Left Wing agenda from their text books and their Liberal Teacher’s Union propaganda machines.
          It would take thousands and thousands of internet schools to make a dent not to mention, Corporations, Medical Field, Legal Field, etc. do not take internet degree people.

          • Higlac

            Homeschooling at least up through high-school and done properly (with vigilant parents!!!) WILL go far in reducing the influence of the Marxists in those first 12 years.

            One of the things that MUST be emphasised in those years is the teaching of the EVILS of Marxism and totalitarianism overall (including Islam and Nazism). Get the young adults properly inoculated – and then monitored in Universities so as not to get caught in the wrong movements; THEN all the trickery of the Marxist professors, teachers, lecturers, tutors, &c. will be much less effective.

          • Erudite Mavin

            Most households have one parent at best.
            Millions of households have a so called mother and a sperm donor both who are high school drop outs
            Then here are millions of households who have both parents working to just get by.
            If those who do not want their kids brainwashed by the left wing public schools,
            enroll them in Parochial schools or private schools

          • Higlac

            Still, there are ways that two or three “families” COULD manage home-school arrangements – important for those who can’t afford private or Parochial school-expenses.

            Yes, for those who can afford those alternatives: well and good; for those who can’t, it’s VITAL that any and all possible means be exploited in order to AVOID giving the Marxists and Moslems any chance to get their claws upon the youth of the West!!! [This is not only for the USA and/or Canada: our entire Judæo-Christian, Western civilisation is at stage!!!]

          • Erudite Mavin

            The number of those attending public school are at least 85% liberal even though their parents are conservative. or liberal.
            There is a vast percentage of parents who are more interested in reality TV than what their kids are being taught.
            I have a clue about this as long before I was in the legal field, I was an administrator of a Parochial school pre through 8th grade. I know what is going on as I knew in the early 60s, the liberal teachers I dealt with face to face
            in Public Schools.
            Bogus excuse that a parent can’t afford Parochial school.
            Some how they can afford two cars, big screen TVs, why not rent an apt, rather than payments on a home
            and all the expense that goes with it.
            I grew up in a one bedroom apts. with my parents. and I am still alive.

          • Higlac

            Eh, there are several valid points you make indeed!!

            Regarding those parents who CAN afford lots of material goods (2 or more cars, large-screen plasma TVs, &c.) yet claim they can’t afford parochial (presumably Catholic for the most part) education: that shows just how askew their priorities are – in fact, there are enough parents who don’t truly love their children or even understand what true love is. Woe’s them all right…

            However, I’m quite sure there are at least SOME who are genuinely at the low end of the social scale – surely we need not disdain them…

            Alas, people all too often DO want to have a permanent home of sorts instead of perpetually renting an apartment: status, wish to believe in permanency (shows one’s vanity), deny their actually being as transient as anybody else – be safe from eviction or summary home invasion by authorities.

            Truly, Lord, PLEASE Return ASAP…

  • pupsncats

    The tolerance and diversity provisions of colleges and universities are a sham. Of course we all know that. Nothing good, true, of real human value, or worth is ever tolerated by the totalitarian leftists who run 99% of the “higher education” institutions in this country. Why parents waste so much of their money and their brainwashed kids go into a lifetime of debt to spend time in these institutions is totally insane.

  • Parfie

    Classic Muslim MO. This is not a religion, but a cult. Read their Quran, it says they can lie, cheat and steal, rape, honor kill? Best tenements to all religions has things like honesty, respect, etc…. Christians and all legitimate Faiths need to stand up and say, we were here first, we will not go… You get a room when we add-on and not before, make do!

    • Quratu_A3uni

      What Quran are you reading? The Quran does not state that you can lie, cheat, steal, rape and honour kill. In fact, the Quran speaks against such evils and classifies them as sins.

      • fmobler

        This one, for starters:

        “I will cast terror into the hearts of the unbelievers, so strike [them] upon the necks [behead them] and strike from them every fingertip’” (Koran 8:12).

        “Fight those among the People of the Book [Christians and Jews] who do not believe in Allah nor the Last Day, who do not forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden, and who do not embrace the religion of truth [Islam], until they pay the jizya with willing submissiveness and feel themselves utterly subdued” (Koran 9:29).

        “Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever you find them—seize them, besiege them, and make ready to ambush them!” (Koran 9:5).

        “Fighting has been enjoined upon you [Muslims] while it is hateful to you” (2:216)

        • Quratu_A3uni

          For starters if you want to pluck out verses from the Quran, try and read the verse before or after it to understand the context. In addition to this, these verses were sent down in relation to specific events that were occurring at the time of revelation. They are not legal rulings about fighting all non-Muslims. Those verses do not at all indicate that cheating, lying, rape and honour killings are permitted as commented above.

          Verse 8:12

          This verse is not about killing non-Muslims. It is regarding the first battle the Muslims fought, the Battle of Badr. The people of Mecca prepared an army of 1000 soldiers and marched to Medina to attack the Muslims. This was after the Muslims had fled Mecca due to severe levels of torture and persecution that spanned 13 years. The verse was revealed specifically in regards to this battle in which they were threatened by an enemy who intended on wiping them out. It was a war of defence, not a war to kill disbelievers for no reason.

          The verse all non- Muslims use to spread their ignorance and hatred of Islam, 9.5:

          The Muslims had a treaty with the people of Quraysh known as the treaty of Hudaibiya. Within this treaty was a clause stipulating that there shall be no war for ten years and those who wished to align themselves with Quraysh were free to do so, while those who wished to join the Muslim alliance were also given the freedom to do so. A year and a half later, the tribe of Banu Bakr (aligned with Quraysh) attacked the tribe of Banu Khuza’a (Muslim alliance). The Quraysh joined the attack in the darkness of the night. They were killed without any mercy and only forty or so are said to have escaped. This was a clear violation of the treaty and as a result the following verses were revealed:

          Excepted are those with whom you made a treaty among the polytheists and then they have not been deficient toward you in anything or supported anyone against you; so complete for them their treaty until their term [has ended]. Indeed, Allah loves the righteous [who fear Him]. (9:4)

          And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful. (9:5)

          And if any one of the Polytheists seeks your protection, give him protection until he listens to the Word of Allah, then let him reach his place of safety. That is because they are a people who do not know. (9:6)

          The verses are only in reference to those who violated the treaty and initiated the war. This is clearly evident from the previous verse which states that violence could not be committed against those who did not break the treaty. Moreover, the next verse states that if any of them seek the protection of the Muslims, then they must protect them regardless of their beliefs.

          Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture – [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled. (9:29)

          As mentioned above, it is evident that Muslims cannot attack those who fighting against Muslims or persecuting them due to their beliefs. Unless Muslims are being oppressed, persecuted for their beliefs, or come under foreign attack or there is an attempt to expel them from their lands, then they are permitted to defend themselves. Muslims cannot attack nations that they have signed peace treaties with nor any other country that is not hostile towards them. In regards to the second part of the verse, freedom of religion is an essential principle in an Islamic state. However, those who are not Muslim must pay a tax in order to contribute to the state budget. It is similar to modern day taxes. Many believe that this is unfair, however, what they fail to realise is that Muslims are already required to pay 2.5% of their wealth every year that is spent by the state on social necessities. The jizya was only required off men who were of fighting age and could not join the military because of their religious beliefs. It was a tax used to protect non-Muslims if an attack were to occur in their land. Women, the elderly, children and the physically and mentally handicapped were not required to pay the jizya.

          Again, this verse is only in relation to those who are hostile towards Muslims and who attack or oppress them because the Quran States the following:

          Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land – it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one – it is as if he had saved mankind entirely. And our messengers had certainly come to them with clear proofs. Then indeed many of them, [even] after that, throughout the land, were transgressors. (5:32)

          Verse 2:216
          This verse is in reference to protecting one’s land from invasion or attack. It is not speaking of fighting against those who are not Muslims. It is implying that although fighting and war is disliked, it is sometimes necessary in order to protect the lives of the citizens of the country.

          Neither the Quran nor Islam advocates violence without just cause. The Quran states the following:

          Allah does not forbid you to deal justly and kindly with those who fought not against you on account of religion and did not drive you out of your homes. Verily, Allah loves those who deal with equity. (60:8)

          The good deed and the evil deed cannot be equal. Repel (the evil) with one which is better (i.e. Allah ordered the faithful believers to be patient at the time of anger, and to excuse those who treat them badly), then verily! he, between whom and you there was enmity, (will become) as though he was a close friend. (41:34)

          O you who have believed, do not consume one another’s wealth unjustly but only [in lawful] business by mutual consent. And do not kill yourselves [or one another]. Indeed, Allah is to you ever Merciful. (4:29)

          Whoever intercedes for a good cause will have a reward therefrom; and whoever intercedes for an evil cause will have a burden therefrom. And ever is Allah , over all things, a Keeper. (4:85)

          O you who have believed, be persistently standing firm for Allah , witnesses in justice, and do not let the hatred of a people prevent you from being just. Be just; that is nearer to righteousness. And fear Allah ; indeed, Allah is Acquainted with what you do. (5:8)

          And if they incline to peace, then incline to it [also] and rely upon Allah . Indeed, it is He who is the Hearing, the Knowing. (8:61)

          Selectively cutting and pasting quotes with an understanding of the context results in misconstruing and misinterpreting the verse.

      • Waldland

        Other “muslims” must be stealing your religion then, because they are making a very plain case to the world that what you say simply isn’t the way many practice Islam. I suggest you do something about these “co-religionists”.

      • malinse

        The art of deception. If you truly believe what you are saying, you are a product of Islam’s deception. The truth is out there, my prayer to God in Jesus’ name, for you, is that you seek Him and find Him.

  • http://longhornproject.org/ Robin Rosenblatt

    Islam is taking over north America

    • Libslayer

      Ain’t gonna happen.
      Pushback will be vigorous.
      Islam is a dead religion, and will never be accepted by free people.

      • http://longhornproject.org/ Robin Rosenblatt

        It is about finished taking over western Europe, America is next and with Obama and the democrats help they will to do it. Not enough people are willing to learn about it or stop it.

        • http://longhornproject.org/ Robin Rosenblatt

          Islam is Evil. What part of Evil do people not understand? Islam enslaves your mind, your body and your soul. It must be destroyed.

          They use “Takiah” the Islamic law to lie in order to advance Islam.

          The 1400-year Islam Cultural War is taking over Europe for the Third Time and Now Threatening America.

          Only knowledge and working together will win this battle.

          They use “Takiah” the Islamic law to lie in order to advance Islam.

          The Third Choice by Mark Durie: One choice become Islamic, second a slave, third death. Add one choice if you act now, Freedom.

          Culture and Conflict, by P. Salzman: Shows we are in an Islamic Cultural war.

          The Arab Mind by R. Patai: US military uses this book training their soldiers and officers.

          Infidel by Ayaan Hirsi Ali: good for young women.

          Lifting the Veil by I.Q. Ali Rassooli: a translation of the major religious books. On the web at http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Idiots+Guide+to+Islam&oq=Idiots+Guide+to+Islam&aq=f&aqi&aql&gs_sm=3&gs_upl=1605l1605l0l1848l1l1l0l0l0l0l0l0ll0l0

          The Prince by Machiavelli; the methods use by Feudalistic kings are the same methods Islam uses today.

          Books of Islam Culture War Against Israel

          BattleGround, Fact and Fantasy in Palestine by S. Katz

          From Time Immemorial J. Peters, Commissioned by Arafat to show Palestinians were in Israel from the beginning
          of time but ended up showing Jews were in Israel from the beginning of time. Source MI6 secret documents.

        • Libslayer

          Islam is a death cult. People will learn fast with the next big Muslim terror attack on America, which has been all but guaranteed with our Muslim president. Islam is sadistic trash from sadistic people.
          Islam has NOTHING to offer beyond death, destruction, and Islamic slavery. In the end, Islam will be destroyed.

      • nopeacenow

        It is being accepted everywhere. Everyone seems to be afraid of being called racist or Islamophobic. Under multiculturalism Canadians must make provision to accede to the requests for accommodation for Islam even though Islam makes no accommodations for non-Muslims. More Muslim immigration will lead to more requests for accommodation and the West will go down the drain.

        • Libslayer

          Radical Islam is only “accepted ” by leftist apologists, and closet Muslims like Obama.
          Real people with common sense know it’s an ancient death cult.
          There will be pushback eventually, but not from the clueless eggheads in academia, the MSM or Hollywood, until “moderate Muslims” start sawing their heads off. Islam is pure evil, and it will one day be eradicated from the earth.
          Millions will die, but in the end, the inhuman aberration of Islam will cease to exist.

  • Joe The Gentile

    “….the needs of the Muslim community mean they need a space specifically for them…”

    Um, yes, but unfortunately, that space they ‘need’ is ultimately the entire earth. This is not me saying this, it is Muhammad saying it. Islam says we owe it to them. Dhimmis submit to this demand. The Free World says ‘no’.

  • Libslayer

    If there are ANY “moderate” Muslim associations, I am completely unaware of their existence.
    I doubt any actually exist.
    Groups like CAIR are all on the “jihad against the wicked infidel west” bandwagon. No exceptions that I have seen.
    Islam is pure evil.

    • nopeacenow

      There are no moderate Muslims. There are the radical Muslims, the less radical Muslims, the supporters of radical Muslims and the Muslims in Name Only (MINO) who came from Muslim countries, were born Muslim and never attend the mosque or have read the Koran. MINOs could get religion when the Jihad to take over the West begins.

      • Steven Brown

        I­’v­­­e st­­­arte­­­­d ea­­­rn­­­in­­­­g 8­­­5 b­­uc­­­ks­­/­­h s­­­in­­ce i st­­­art­­­ed t­o wo­­­­r­k on­­­l­i­ne s­­ix m­­ont­­hs a­­g­o… M­­y jo­­­­b i­s t­o s­­i­t a­t h­­­om­e sev­­­­era­l ho­­­u­rs e­­­ve­ry d­­­­­­ay a­­­n­d d­o b­­­as­­­ic w­­or­k i g­­­e­t fr­­­om th­­­is c­­­om­­­pa­­ny t­­­ha­­t i di­­sco­­ver­­ed o­­n-l­­in­­e… I a­­­m v­­er­y g­­la­­d t­­­o s­­­ha­­re t­­­hi­s o­­ppor­­tun­ity w­­­it­­­h y­­­o­u… i­­­t­’s a­­­n am­­­az­­ing j­­ob
        -> CH­E­­CK HE­R­E WH­A­T I D­­O… <-

      • Quratu_A3uni

        There are 1.6 billion Muslims in the world, have you conducted research and asked them all about the tenants of their faith and what they classify themselves as? There are millions of moderate Muslims in the world.

        Your lack of understanding of jihad is highlighted in your final comment.

        Jihad literally means struggle or striving in the path of God or to work for a noble cause with determination. It does not mean holy war. In Arabic, the word war is harb and holy is muqadassa and the Quran makes no reference to this concept.

        Jihad is divided into two categories: the greater jihad and lesser jihad. The greater jihad encompasses a personal struggle against one’s desires and carnal soul. It is a personal rather than a political struggle. The lesser jihad involves the physical actions one takes to prevent harm within society including social and religious activism and participating in a just war. A just war is a war that is sanctioned by the government to stop oppression or an invasion. It can even include fighting for the rights and freedoms of those people who are being persecuted regardless of whether they are Muslims, Jews, or Christians who are being oppressed. To kill innocent civilians, to torture and mutilate bodies, to destroy infrastructure and vegetation, and to fight on your own and not under government approval for any reason is forbidden.

        Islam orders its followers to abide by the laws of the country they are living in. Islam protects freedom of religious belief:
        “Let there be no compulsion in the religion: Surely the Right Path is clearly distinct from the crooked path.” (2:256.)

        • FedUpWithWelfareStates

          We have a FULL understanding of the Islamic Designs for infiltrating our country & establishing Sharia…which is exactly why we are rooting the Taqiyya actions of Muslims out, educating the naïve American public to Islam’s threat & telling ALL Muslims to Get Out of Our Country!

          • Quratu_A3uni

            You do know that Taqiyya is not an Islamic concept and was brought about by Shias hundred of years after the death of Muhammad?

            Most Muslims couldn’t care less about shariah being implemented in western countries. The problem is, you don’t know what shariah is but seek to comment anyway.

            Shariah is a divine law that covers one’s relationship with the creator, society, the nation, fellow human beings and the universe. It contains both legal rules and ethical principles. It is a guidance for human beings to attain the highest level of character. It is a system based on educating individuals, establishing justice and looking after people’s welfare. Shariah is not merely a legal system. It is a way of life. It teaches ethics and morals. It is practised in all areas of society, whether that be in the home or interactions with others. It is about being a pious and good human being. Legal rulings are merely one aspect of Shariah

          • spicefreak

            Shariah discriminates against women, how is that divine? In the province I live in muslim women advocated against the adoption of sharia because it would mean the end of equality for them. It says in the Quran that wives can be beaten if they are disobedient…another “divine” law??? Also no minimum age for a marriage contract–excuse me that is like a purchase not a consensual agreement. The child has ZERO ability to say no to such a so-called union. You call that pious?

          • Quratu_A3uni

            Where do you get this nonsense from? Culture has influenced many societies and it is usually culture, not religion that is responsible for the lack of rights women have today.

            Domestic violence is not allowed in Islam and the verse you are referring to has been interpreted countless times by scholars who state unequivocally that women cannot be abused by their husbands. In regards to women Muhammad stated:
            ‘The most perfect of the believers in faith are the best of them in moral excellence, and the best of you are the kindest to their wives. (At-Tirmidhî)

            ‘None but a noble man treats women in an honorable manner, and none but an ignoble treats women disgracefully.’ (At-Tirmidhî)

            The Quran clearly mentions that the deeds of a believing woman is equals to that of a believing man. It often highlights that in the sight of God, no individual is more superior except through their righteous actions.

            In shariah and under Islam a woman has the right to be educated. She has the right to work – the first Muslim medical centre in medina was opened by a woman. There were doctors, nurses, traders, teachers etc all present within early Muslim societies. She has the right to select her own partner in marriage – any marriage contract is annulled immediately if the marriage was forced. She has the right to divorce and to stipulate conditions within her marriage contract and if the husband does not meet these conditions she can divorce him immediately. Income and property belonging to a woman is solely hers. A woman has the right to actively participate in society and even during the early rise of Islam, women were given government positions. A woman has the right to criticise the government and have her grievances addressed. She has the right to vote and participate in the democratic process.

            Women today are dominated by patriarchal regimes that have taken away the rights they were given under islam. Colonisation, patriarchal dictatorships, culture, poverty and lack of education are to blame for the current regression of women’s rights.

          • Joe The Gentile

            It’s nonsense that taqiyya is not an Islamic concept. What you are right about is that it was only given that specific name hundreds of years of the death of Muhammad.

            Taqiyya the concept, as opposed to taqiyya the word, is fully supported by Islam.

          • ebonystone

            If taqiyya is not a Moslem concept, but a Shia one, does that mean that the Shias are not to be considered Moslems? Yet the Saudis — the guardians of the two holy places — allow them to make the pilgrimage to Mecca. Other groups that have modified the teachings of Mohammad — like the Ismailis and the Amadis — are not allowed into Mecca, since they are not considered to be real Moslems. So apparently taqiyya is acceptable to Moslems, even if it did originate among the Shia, centuries after Mohammad.

          • Quratu_A3uni

            No, I mean that it was not a concept that was practised at the time of Muhammad. It was not considered acceptable to lie and the Quran continuously speaks about truth and justice.

          • Ayatolla Howmany

            Bullshit!

            Allah’s Apostle said, “Who is willing to kill Ka’b bin Al-Ashraf who has hurt Allah and His Apostle?” Thereupon Muhammad bin Maslama got up saying, “O Allah’s Apostle! Would you like that I kill him?” The Prophet said, “Yes,” Muhammad bin Maslama said, “Then allow me to say a (false) thing (i.e. to deceive Ka’b). “The Prophet said, “You may say it.” (Bukhari 59:369)

          • kikorikid

            Islam is a Totalitarian/Supremacist ideology that operates
            behind a veneer/façade of Religiosity.
            “Civilization Jihad” and “Creeping Sharia” are not Peace.
            Islam does not come in Peace.
            Islam does not come to assimilate.
            Islam comes ONLY to: Conquer, Submit, Convert, or Kill.
            300,000,000+ Muslims are Mujahideen, Jihadist.

          • Quratu_A3uni

            Islam is a religion based on the worship of one God and on the principles of justice, mercy and peace.

            This concept of jihad that has been hijacked by Muslims who have a distorted view of the religion has destroyed the pure Islamic principles taught by the Prophet (PBUH). Jihad does not involve fighting non-Muslims in order to create Islamic states worldwide. As a Muslim, I am bound by Islamic law to follow the law of the country as long as it does not conflict with my religion. And to be honest, most laws around the world are created based on the ideals of freedom and justice which are similar, if not the same as Islam.

            Jihad literally means struggle or striving in the path of God or to work for a noble cause with determination. It does not mean holy war. In Arabic, the word war is harb and holy is muqadassa and the Quran makes no reference to this concept.

            Jihad is divided into two categories: the greater jihad and lesser jihad. The greater jihad encompasses a personal struggle against one’s desires and carnal soul. It is a personal rather than a political struggle. The lesser jihad involves the physical actions one takes to prevent harm within society including social and religious activism and participating in a just war. A just war is a war that is sanctioned by the government to stop oppression or an invasion. It can even include fighting for the rights and freedoms of those people who are being persecuted regardless of whether they are Muslims, Jews, or Christians who are being oppressed. To kill innocent civilians, to torture and mutilate bodies, to destroy infrastructure and vegetation, and to fight on your own and not under government approval for any reason is forbidden.

            Shariah is a complete system. It is not merely a penal code as I mentioned previously. Shariah is a divine law that covers one’s relationship with the creator, society, the nation, fellow human beings and the universe. It contains both legal rules and ethical principles. It is a guidance for human beings to attain the highest level of character. It is a system based on educating individuals, establishing justice and looking after people’s welfare. Shariah is not merely a legal system. It is a way of life. It teaches ethics and morals. It is practised in all areas of society, whether that be in the home or interactions with others. It is about being a pious and good human being. Legal rulings are merely one aspect of Shariah.

            Islam does not come to convert, conquer and kill and that is proven in the following verses:

            “Allah does not forbid you to deal justly and kindly with those who fought not against you on account of religion and did not drive you out of your homes. Verily, Allah loves those who deal with equity.” (60:8)

            “O you who have believed, do not consume one another’s wealth unjustly but only [in lawful] business by mutual consent. And do not kill yourselves [or one another]. Indeed, Allah is to you ever Merciful.” (4:29)

            “O you who have believed, be persistently standing firm for Allah , witnesses in justice, and do not let the hatred of a people prevent you from being just. Be just; that is nearer to righteousness. And fear Allah ; indeed, Allah is Acquainted with what you do.” (5:8)

            “And if they incline to peace, then incline to it [also] and rely upon Allah . Indeed, it is He who is the Hearing, the Knowing.” (8:61)

            Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land – it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one – it is as if he had saved mankind entirely. (5:32)

            “Let there be no compulsion in the religion: Surely the Right Path is clearly distinct from the crooked path.” (2:256.)

            “Let him who wishes to believe, do so; and let him who wishes to disbelieve, do so.” (18: 29)

            And three million fighters? Where did you get your statistics from?

          • kikorikid

            Quratu, If there are, indeed, 1.6 Billion Muslims in the World and
            20% have answered the Imams call to Jihad then that would make a figure of a little over 300 Million Jihadis who want to cut the throats of Non-Believers. DEATH TO JIHADIS.

        • glpage

          Taqqiya is the term used by Muslims to describe the blather you have posted. I will take the religious leaders of Islam at their word.

          • Quratu_A3uni

            Taqiyya is not used by Muslims except by Shias. It was not a part of initial islamic teachings and as previously stated was developed by shias hundreds of years after the advent of islam.

          • kikorikid

            So you are a Wahabist throat cutter of children.

          • Quratu_A3uni

            I am not Wahabi and I detest all acts of violence including those committed by Muslims.

          • malinse

            Mohammed committed violence; do you detest him? Didn’t Mohammed call for violence? Don’t the violent Muslims today cite the Koran for their actions?

          • Quratu_A3uni

            No, because Muhammad fought to defend the land and the people he was living in as they were being threatened by the invading Meccans on numerous occasions. The same Meccans who persecuted the Muslims for 13 years before they fled to Medina and Abyssinia. The same Meccans who made the Muslims die of starvation through a boycott on goods and who tortured Muslims for their beliefs.

            Those extremists and terrorists who cite the Quran know full well that Islam does not call for violence against those who don’t believe in Islam. They use these verses to radicalise young people so they have cannon fodder to implement their own perverted and political interests.

          • Michael Moon
          • Quratu_A3uni

            There were a approximately 20 Jewish tribes In Medina at the time of the Prophet and three of those tribes were breaking treaties and causing havoc within the city. When the Prophet arrived in Medina, he made a constitutional agreement with the Jews and afforded them rights and the freedom to practice their beliefs without fear or persecution.

            The treaty that was signed by the Jewish tribes stipulated that there must be a peaceful coexistence with Jews and Muslims and that they were both to protect Medina if it came under attack and both were to share in the finances of maintaining the city. The treaty included three of the major Jewish tribes in the area: Banu Qurayza, Banu Nazir, and Banu Qaynuqa. Other Jewish tribes maintained peaceful and civil relations with the Muslims, but the three tribes mentioned above did not and continuously breached the treaty they had signed.

            Banu Nazir attempted to assassinate the Prophet, leading to a war between them and the Muslims. If any head of state was assassinated in modern society, I believe the reaction would be the same.

            Secondly, members from Banu Qaynuqa were causing issues. At one stage, they exposed a woman’s body by tearing her clothes off in the local market. Both tribes were expelled from the city for their continual transgressions and their inability to abide by the treaties they had signed.

            In regards to Banu Qurayza, they not only breached the treaty, but they also conspired with the Meccan tribes who were planning to attack the city of Medina. This was a direct act of treason. After the battle, the Prophet approached the tribe of Banu Qurayza and asked them to select an arbitrator. They nominated Sa’d ibn Muadh, an ally of Banu Qurayza.

            Sa’d took a pledge from both the Prophet and the Jewish leaders and proclaimed that his decision would be final and binding. After listening to both cases, he sentenced those who had committed treason and participated in the military campaign to death, as was the custom at the time. The Jews did not reject the decision made because the sentence for committing treason that was handed to them is also found within their own scripture.

            Nadhuran, a Hindu writer states: “…though it seems harsh, Sa’d’s verdict was fair. First, this verdict accorded with [the Jews’] own laws. Second, the verdict was made by a mediator who was their own ally and they themselves had chosen him to arbitrate between them and Muhammad.”

            Further to this, Karen Armstrong argues that “… It is, however, important to note that the Qurayzah were not killed on religious or racial grounds. None of the other Jewish tribes in the oasis either objected or attempted to intervene, clearly regarding it as a purely political and tribal matter… The men of Qurayzah were executed for treason. The seventeen other Jewish tribes of Medina remained in the oasis, living on friendly terms with the Muslims for many years, and the Qur’an continued to insist that Muslims remember their spiritual kinship with the People of the Book…”

          • malinse

            So violence is OK if it falls under certain criteria, i.e. defending the land? So Mohammed was just a peaceful man, like Gandhi, or Jesus who wanted peace, but when attacked fought back in self-defense? Is that what your final answer is on violence and Islam? So you are saying everybody who has been killed in the name of Islam was killed because Islam is just defending their lands?

          • glpage

            Great synopsis of Wikipedia, but there are references from Bukhari that practiced the lying and deceit associated with taqqiya. There are several references from the Quran that indicate deceit is acceptable if it furthers Islam: “And an announcement from Allah and His Messenger to the
            people on the day of the greater pilgrimage that Allah and His
            Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters.” Kind of sounds like taqqiya even if the term is not mentioned in the Kuran.

          • Ayatolla Howmany

            LIAR

        • Vladsmom

          Besides if that’s the case WHY ARENT YOU ALL DOING SONETHING ABOUT IT!!!! You all are sitting back, letting isis, terrorists do your dirty work!! STAND UP AND SPEAK OUT AGAINST CAIR, and the thousands of other terrorists groups!

        • liz

          We’ve heard all this bullish!t ad nauseam, and we’re not impressed.
          Muslims come in two categories –
          1) those that knowingly embrace and obey the barbaric, depraved, and regressive teachings of Mohammed, who are therefore to be despised for their depravity; and –
          2) those who are ignorant of the teachings of their own scriptures, in spite of the evidence of them manifested in the acts of terrorism committed by Muslims daily) and are therefore to be held in contempt for such willful ignorance.

          • Quratu_A3uni

            And people like you come under one category: xenophobic.

            The teachings of the Muhammad were neither barbaric, depraved nor regressive. There are 1.6 billion Muslims in the world, not 1.6 billion terrorists. Do your research before making comments filled with hatred and ignorance

            Michael H. Hart:
            “My choice of Muhammad to lead the list of the world’s most influential persons may surprise some readers and may be questioned by others, but he was the only man in history who was supremely successful on both the religious and secular level.”

            Mahatma Gandhi:
            “I wanted to know the best of one who holds today undisputed sway over the hearts of millions of mankind… I became more than convinced that it was not the sword that won a place for Islam in those days in the scheme of life. It was the rigid simplicity, the utter self-effacement of the Prophet, the scrupulous regard for his pledges, his intense devotion to his friends and followers, his intrepidity, his fearlessness, his absolute trust in God and in his own mission. These and not the sword carried everything before them and surmounted every obstacle.”

            Thomas Carlye:
            “…The lies (Western slander) which well-meaning zeal has heaped round this man (Muhammed) are disgraceful to ourselves only…How one man single-handedly, could weld warring tribes and wandering Bedouins into a most powerful and civilized nation in less than two decades….A silent great soul, one of that who cannot but be earnest. He was to kindle the world; the world’s Maker had ordered so.”

            George Bernard Shaw:
            “I believe if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring much needed peace and happiness.
            I have studied him – the man and in my opinion is far from being an anti–Christ. He must be called the Savior of Humanity.
            I have prophesied about the faith of Mohammad that it would be acceptable the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to be acceptable to the Europe of today.”

            H.G. Wells:
            “The Islamic teachings have left great traditions for equitable and gentle dealings and behaviour, and inspire people with nobility and tolerance. These are human teachings of the highest order and at the same time practicable. These teachings brought into existence a society in which hard-heartedness and collective oppression and injustice were the least as compared with all other societies preceding it… Islam is replete with gentleness, courtesy, and fraternity.”

            R. Bosworth Smith:
            “He was Caesar and Pope in one; but he was Pope without Pope’s pretensions, Caesar without the legions of Caesar: without a standing army, without a bodyguard, without a palace, without a fixed revenue; if ever any man had the right to say that he ruled by the right divine, it was Mohammed, for he had all the power without its instruments and without its supports. He cared not for the dressings of power. The simplicity of his private life was in keeping with his public life.”

            James Michener:
            “No other religion in history spread so rapidly as Islam. The West has widely believed that this surge of religion was made possible by the sword. But no modern scholar accepts this idea, and the Qur’an is explicit in the support of the freedom of conscience.”

          • liz

            Yes, a lot of people have been duped by Islamist whitewashing and propaganda – so what?
            That isn’t enough to hide the truth anymore. Too many people know what the Koran actually says, and what Mohammed actually did, to be fooled by lies.
            Terrorists justify barbaric murder by quoting the Koran constantly. “Interpret” it however you want – in it’s own words it still commands you to hate and murder Jews, Christians, and all other “infidels”, and to subjugate the world in submission to your “god”.
            Winston Churchill said: “the influence of (Islam) paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world”.

          • kikorikid

            Churchill also said: “Islam in a Man is like Hydrophobia
            in a DOG”. Brits are being arrested in the UK for uttering
            this statement. Islamist, like Rabid Dogs, should be shot.

          • mohdanga

            You missed one, from an unknown named Winston Churchill.

            “How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries!
            Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia
            in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many
            countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods
            of commerce and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the
            Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and
            refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan
            law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as
            a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the
            faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.

            Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion
            paralyzes the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde
            force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant
            and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising
            fearless warriors at every step, and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the
            strong arms of science, the science against which it (Islam) has vainly struggled,
            the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.”

          • hellosnackbar

            Killing innocent people by Mudslimes seems to be an empirical fact within the dogma of the Koranus.
            It’s time for universal satire of the true black comedy that is the backbone of imaginary Allah and mendacious Mo!

          • SirWilhelm

            I have discovered the true nature of Islam. We have overlooked it, because it is so basic, and simple. Everyone who becomes a Muslim, or is born into Islam, must, at some point in their life, swear to be a slave of Allah. Slavery is evil, is it not? Isn’t that why most of the Western world has outlawed slavery? That makes Allah a slavemaster, and Islam is his evil slave cult, that he has ordered to conquer the world, and enslave all non-Muslims. All the rest is just window dressing.

          • zoroaster

            You asked “where do you get this nonsense from” and you advised “do your research”, but then you post the above! I don’t know about the other quotes, but the one attributed to George Bernard Shaw is well known to be a total fabrication, see, e.g., http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/ads-for-islam-misquote-shaw-from-bogus-book/story-fn59niix-1226676192844?nk=3f5404ba4c3f46b87d9b03f08d4f7652

          • SirWilhelm

            Are you a slave of Allah? Did you swear to be Allah’s slave, as all who are, or want to, become Muslims, must do? Does that not make Allah, a slavemaster? Is slavery not evil? Did not Mohammed kill the men, and enslave the women and children, of the tribes he conquered, personally? Most Western countries have outlawed slavery, because it is evil. There is no freedom in slavery. No matter what window dressings Islam has dressed itself in, it is nothing but an evil slave cult, that worships an evil deity, that wants his followers to enslave the whole world, for him.

          • Higlac

            Well said!!!

            In fact, Mauritania, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Sudan and Yemen ALL practise slavery – covertly, if not openly.

          • Higlac

            ALL these people were deceived and/or LEFTISTS – which automatically places them in your camp. Furthermore, unless you give the exact boo, chapter and verse, we’ll NEVER trust you – EVER!!!

        • iluvisrael

          I learned all I need to know about the bloodthirsty cult of islam on 9/11.

          • Quratu_A3uni

            Many still don’t know much about September 11 including why Tower 7 collapsed on its own when its steel frame was built to withstand destruction.

            Did you know that muslims were among the dead?

            September 11 occurred as a result of U.S foreign policy in the Middle East and Afghanistan. I condemn the 9/11 attacks and such violence against innocent civilians is barbaric. Though there is no justification for such atrocities, when you continue to meddle in the politics of foreign countries and kill their people, you create radicalisation within a certain group of people. The U.S was warned after its bombing of Afghanistan in 1998 that there would be retaliation for the killing of innocent civilians.

          • Joe The Gentile

            “September 11 occurred as a result of U.S foreign policy in the Middle East and Afghanistan.”

            I’ll take it it was just coincidence that it happened to fall on a date infused with tremendous Jihad symbolism, Sept 11, as if to commemorate the Battle of Vienna, Sept 11, 1683? When the Jihad was turned back by John III Sobieski?

            No, hold on — I get it, that 1683 Jihad too was all about grievances. Just as all of them are — a grievance that we dare to be a free people and say ‘NO!’ to becoming Muslim.

          • iluvisrael

            nice try haji – every day there’s news of another moslem atrocity – all done in the name of islam. Face it – your ‘religion’ has BIG problems and if moslems don’t fix it, we infidels will.

          • mohdanga

            “September 11 occurred as a result of U.S foreign policy in the Middle East and Afghanistan.” Odd given that the US never entered Afghanistan until after the Sept 11 terrorist attacks by your Muslim brethren.

          • Stosh777

            No, actually the mohammedan is correct about that one. The U.S. helped Afghan mujahideen oust the Soviets from their land in the ’80s. For that, the mujahideen (who morphed into the Taliban and al-Qaeda) repaid us with 9-11. Moral: when dealing with Muslims, no good deed goes unpunished.

          • Quratu_A3uni

            Read history, they bombed Afghanistan in 1998.

          • mohdanga

            And why did they bomb Afghanistan, you idiot??
            “American cruise missiles pounded sites in Afghanistan and Sudan Thursday in retaliation for the deadly bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania on August 7.
            “Let our actions today send this message loud and clear — there are no expendable American targets,” U.S. President Clinton said in a televised address to the American people Thursday evening. “There will be no sanctuary for terrorists. We will defend our people, our interests and our values.”
            U.S. officials say the six sites attacked in Afghanistan were part of a network of terrorist compounds near the Pakistani border that housed supporters of millionaire Osama bin Laden.”
            So Muslim terrorists attack us and we’re supposed to just take it?? Typical Muslim crybaby.

          • Quratu_A3uni

            I’m not crying. You do realise that all the insults, attacks on me, the foul language, the disrespect and the rudeness the commenters have been responding with really don’t affect me in the least.

            The U.S went in to capture or kill Osama bin Laden. The Taliban had told America that they would extradite him to an Islamic country and have him tried under Islamic law. The Americans refused and killed innocent civilians instead.

            America believes that it is free to terrorise other nations and kill their people without retaliation. Even the director of the NSA under Ronald Regan, General William Odom declared: “by any measure the U.S. has long used terrorism. In 1978-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism – in every version they produced, the lawyers said the U.S. would be in violation.”

            The US uses terrorist organisations as a tool for foreign policy. During the 1970’s the CIA used the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt to prevent Soviet expansion and to curtail the spread of Marxism. The US was responsible for the creation of Al-Qaeda and the result, Osama bin Laden. Robin Cook, the former British Foreign Secretary informed the House of Commons that “Al-Qaeda was unquestionably a product of Western intelligence agencies.” He stated that Al-Qaeda which translates as “the database” in Arabic, was actually the computer database that listed the names of Islamic extremists who were trained by the CIA and funded by Saudi Arabia in order to defeat the Russians in Afghanistan. Depending on whether these terrorist groups are able to further American interests or not, they are either provided with training and funding or become a military target.

            America has participated in its fair share of crimes. America invaded Iraq under Bush Senior when Saddam attacked Kuwait, yet they financed his war against Iran and supported him with weapons. The embargo of food and medicine placed on Iraq resulted in the deaths of 500,000 children. In an interview with Madeline Albright, Leslie Stahl asked:

            “We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And — and you know, is the price worth it?”
            Madeline Albright: “I think this is a very hard choice, but the price — we think the price is worth it.”

            How can any individual believe that killing 500,000 children is worth it for the punishment of a single individual.

            The War on Terror is merely a war on groups that America was responsible for creating. It provides America with a reason to continue to increase the size of its military. There are two powerful forces operating within the US: the Israel lobby which has a direct influence on Middle East policy and the Military-Industrial-Complex.

            “So completely have many of our principal officeholders fallen under Israeli influence that they not only deny today the legitimacy of Palestinian national aspirations, but debate who more passionately opposes a Palestinian state. The lobby can just about tell the president what to do when it comes to Israel.” – Senator William Fulbright in his 1989 book, The Price of Empire. In a CBS interview Fulbright states: “Israel controls the U.S. Senate.”

            In a radio interview in 2003, Ariel Sharon stated:
            “Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that… I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”

            In 1986, the Israelis provided America with false evidence against Libya resulting in bombing a nation that was innocent of a crime that it did not even commit. The response by a Libyan radical group a few years later, Pan Am flight 103 was bombed killing 270 people.

            Since America’s independence in 1776, the country has been involved in over 53 military invasions and expeditions. The War on Terror has cost taxpayers in America 6.6 trillion dollars and the loss of the lives of thousands of soldiers. However, the military elite have benefited in collecting billions of dollars in profits. More than 70 companies and individuals have scored up to 27 billion dollars in contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan in the past three years alone. 75% of these companies had employees or board members who served in, or had close connections to the Republican and Democratic administrations, members of Congress or high military officials.

            John Mosey, whose daughter was killed in the Lockerbie plane crash wrote a letter to Tony Blair stating that those who died in the bombing were killed because of the aggressive U.S policies in the Middle East: “The utmost care must be taken that whatever path is eventually pursued is successful and does not harm innocent people, thus producing another batch of terrorists.”

            When western countries meddle in the politics of other nations, don’t expect compliance if their people are killed by western forces.

          • Stosh777

            In 1998, al-Qaeda had already killed over 200 innocent civilians at our African embassies. al-Qaeda was given refuge in Afghanistan, which is why Clinton ordered the bombing. If the Taliban had not hosted these criminals, there would have been no bombing. Strange how you leave out these salient facts.

            Muslims, who commit an overwhelming percentage of the world’s atrocities, should remove the log from their own eye before pointing at the mote in another’s.

        • tickletik

          Bwahhahhahahahhahahahah!!!!!!!

          Let me guess, are you the dedicated Muslim propagandist of the day? Who do you think you are fooling with this Taqiya hadji?

        • nopeacenow

          Where are these “moderate” Muslims of yours? Do they wear white hates or some other identifying garment. How are they different from the radicals and will I be able to identify them when I pass them on the street? Those who are moderate today can become radical tomorrow if their radical co-religionists reach their goal of a caliphate. There are some 109 verses in the Koran that call for war against the non-Muslim. Am I to assume that most Muslims haven’t read the Koran and have no idea what it contains about non-Muslims.

          What is a just war? It is a war against non-Muslims. It is the Muslim war against Israel to reclaim land that was once under Islamic rule. It is the ISIS war in Iraq and Syria to recreate the caliphate. It is the war carried out against non-Muslims in the West as stated in the 109 verses in the Koran. This business of the Jihad as being a personal struggle is for the benefit of non-Muslims to hide the true intentions of the Muslim killings, raping and torture of non-Muslims and the Muslim unbelievers.

        • 12banjo

          I have studied as you suggest. I find the notion of “taquiyah” fascinating, for instance.

        • Ayatolla Howmany

          We have heard ALL the lies and deceptions of muslims like you; you bring nothing new to the discussion.

          1. “1.6 billion muslims”– the appeal to numbers, FALLACY.

          “Truth is truth even if NO-ONE believes it; Lie is a lie even if EVERYONE believes it”

          2. Jihad- ‘peaceful struggle’-

          http://www.answeringislam.org/Quran/Themes/jihad_passages.html [164 verses about VIOLENT JIHAD!!]

          3. “Let there be no compulsion in the religion: Surely the Right Path is clearly distinct from the crooked path.”

          “Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.” — Bukhari 9.84.57 ‘baddala deenahu, faqtuhulu’

          4. Taqiyya– However, one of the few books devoted to the subject, At-Taqiyya fi’l-Islam (Dissimulation in Islam) makes it clear that taqiyya is not limited to Shi’a dissimulating in fear of persecution. Written by Sami Mukaram, a former Islamic studies professor at the American University of Beirut and author of some twenty-five books on Islam, the book clearly demonstrates the ubiquity and broad applicability of taqiyya:
          Taqiyya is of fundamental importance in Islam. Practically every Islamic sect agrees to it and practices it … We can go so far as to say that the practice of taqiyya is mainstream in Islam, and that those few sects not practicing it diverge from the mainstream … Taqiyya is very prevalent in Islamic politics, especially in the modern era.[5]
          Taqiyya is, therefore, not, as is often supposed, an exclusively Shi’a phenomenon.

        • Higlac

          Take your muda’rat / taqiyya + kitman, muruna and tawriya ELSEWHERE!!!!!

          Real Moslems are “above the laws of the countries where they live”, “better than everybody else”, &c. ad nauseam!!!!

          DEATH TO ISLAM – now and forever more, and unto ages of ages!!!!!

          • Quratu_A3uni

            Sending love and peace your way too.

          • Higlac

            Have you suppressed ALL your feelings of SHAME, of unease, of true justice for non-Moslems??? You Moslems come across as the worst possible phychopaths of this earth!!!!

            No surprise since you all adulate and IDOLISE Mohammed, who was a genocide (Khaybar), murderer, rapist, liar (even those closest to him couldn’t trust him!!), pederast (pædophile), misogynist (hating women), caninophobe (dogs are Mankind’s BEST Friend!!!), porcinophobe (pigs also are a good friend of Man), simianophobe, bestialist and necrophiliac!!! How on earth can you TOLERATE virtually-worshipping such a HORRIBLE MONSTER of a man – who was using his “allah” as his sock-puppet?????

            I don’t need to hate Moslems, but I can NEVER, EVER, EVER trust them for anything under any situations…

  • MarilynA

    The best way to cure this problem is for nonmuslim students to withdraw from these pro Muslim schools and enroll in schools that do not discriminate against them because of their religion. If enough students do this, the schools will either close or change their policies. The only language these colleges and universities understand is money. As of now, they have sold their souls for the Wahhabi dollar. Hit them in the pocket book if you want to get their attention.

  • MarilynA

    I suggest that when choosing a college for yourself or your child to investigate to see if they have a Muslim Student Association. If they do, it is for sure that this small minority will dictate policy.

  • http://www.misifi.co.uk/ John in Brum

    As Bob Marley most eloquently put it “Get Up, Stand Up, stand up for your right”

  • 2399molly

    What about the universities that exchange American children to Muslim families overseas. This galls me.

  • NJK

    This is what happens when people vote for someone named Hussein. Although, it was probably donations from the Middle East and illegals voting that put him there.

    Barack Obama became President With Illegal Votes, Claims Study – See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2014/11/barack-obama-became-president-with-illegal-votes-claims-study.html/#sthash.lpna6pdU.dpuf

  • De Doc

    Political Correctness meets Islam. Political Correctness loses.

  • Waldland

    Would someone please clarify? Does UWO mean University of Western Ontario or University of Wisconsin Oskosh? This info should be PLAINLY in the article. SHEESH!

  • Mike

    muslims are satanists. There is but one way. EVIL.

  • Texas Patriot

    After a long period of remaining hidden in the mists and shadows of intentional deception and obfuscation, the reality of Islamic Jihad is emerging into the clear light of day, and of course the reality of what we are seeing is pure horror to most Westerners and civilized human beings around the world. Calculated brutality and ruthlessness coupled with a thin veneer of piety and peace is how Jihadist Muslims have always presented themselves.

    The biggest reason the Muslims Armies of the 7th and 8th Centuries were so effective in taking over vast amounts of territory in record time is that no one wanted to fight them and instead of fighting, people would just run away from them in a state of pure horror and blind panic. Just as the original Muslim Armies reached their Waterloo at the Battle of Tours in 732, the massive invasion of the West by Jihadist Muslims as a matter of Stealth Jihad under the guise of a “religion of peace”, which has occurred with increasing momentum over the last 70 years since the end of WWII, may have reached its zenith with the Massacre of Innocents at Mosul in the summer of 2014.

    At this point, very few people still fooled by the absurd propaganda regarding the Religion of Peace, and one after another of major Western political and religious leaders is standing up and publicly renouncing the anti-democratic and totalitarian practices of Jihadist Muslims in the West today.

  • Hard Little Machine

    Well we wouldn’t want the Religion of Peaceniks having to mass murder everyone else during their prayers to peace liturgy, would we?

  • Babylonandon

    Dhimmitude.

  • 12banjo

    All the more reason to frack, and develop natural gas. The poorer the Muslims get the less money they have to work mischief.

  • Keith

    Just waiting for the Western governments to say it has got nothing to do with Islam!!

  • liz

    I have read the bible. It was written in primitive times, by primitive people. But at least they made positive changes to earlier religious practices, such as forbidding human sacrifice. The Koran was written later, yet it regressed into more barbarism than the bible, commanding the killing and subjugation of all who would not submit to Muhammad’s agenda of world conquest. Your fellow Muslims are simply obeying the commands of your prophet when they murder innocent people.
    Jews and Christians outgrew the barbaric past a long time ago. Why do Muslims insist on remaining in the stone age?
    Your time would be better spent educating Muslims about the fact that that they live in the 21st century, rather than trying to defend Islam.

    • Quratu_A3uni

      The Quran was written later and as a result the society was far more progressive than any other and historians have attested to this. The Quran does not permit human sacrifice, where do you get this nonsense from? Prior to Islam the pagan Arabs along with many others around the world were killing and burying their daughters alive because they were ashamed of them. The Quran revealed that Such an act was heinous and sinful:

      “And when the good news is given to any of them of a daughter, His face turns dark and he is filled with grief.”(Quran, 16:58)

      “Those will have lost who killed their children in foolishness without knowledge and prohibited what Allah had provided for them, inventing untruth about Allah. They have gone astray and were not [rightly] guided.”(Quran, 6:140)

      “…do not kill your children out of poverty; We will provide for you and them.” (Quran, 6:151).

      “Do not kill your offspring for fear of want: for it is We Who provide for them and for you as well. Indeed their killing is a heinous excuse.”(Quran, 17:31)

      Secondly, the Quran promotes freedom of religion and specifically states that there is to be no compulsion in religion. Fighting at the time of Muhammad occurred in defense of their land and people as they were being threatened by the Meccans who had previously tortured and persecuted them for their beliefs.

      Jews and Christians outgrew barbaric practices… It would be funny if it wasn’t so serious.

      The Spanish Inquisition, the witch trials, the Crusades, the European wars? The Jewish Defence League? The Haganah and Irgun? The Lord’s Resistance Army, Hutaree, The Army of God, Ku Klux Klan, Lambs of Christ, Concerned Christians, The Covenant, the Sword, and the Arm of The Lord, Phineas Priesthood amongst many other groups listed as terrorist organisations.

      If all Muslims were violent, this world would no longer exist. How many times do people need to be told that there are 1.6 billion Muslims in this world, not 1.6 billion terrorists? Do you not comprehend that there are good and evil people in this world from all backgrounds and religions? Do we attribute the violence and terror of The Lord’s Resistance Army, Hutaree, The Army of God, Ku Klux Klan, Lambs of Christ, Concerned Christians, etc. to all Christians and to Christian doctrine?

      Yes, there are extremists in Islam. Yes there are Muslims misconstruing Quranic text to implement their own political agendas. Yes there are Muslims killing others (the majority of victims being Muslims themselves) but they are a minority in the context of 1.6 billion Muslims. I can guarantee you that Christians and atheists, western, Eurpoean and Asian countries have killed more people than Muslims ever have. So maybe you should all think about the crimes that have been committed not only in the name of religion, but in the name of colonialism, power and greed.

      You all sit there and forget about the war crimes committed by those who hold christian or jewish values. You ignore the violence perpetuated by western forces. You believe that because they use sophisticated weaponry, it’s ok to kill. You believe that because they kill with bombs and missiles, it’s ok. You believe that because they wipe out entire families in one strike it’s ok. It’s ok to wipe out innocent civilians through the use of an atomic bomb. It’s ok to wipe out over a million Afghans under the soviet invasion. It’s ok for Mao, Stalin and Hitler to commit genocide, and mass murder. It’s ok for America to illegally invade countries and kill innocent civilians. It’s ok for genocides to occur in Rwanda, Bosnia, Cambodia and China. It’s ok for the west to invade and colonise countries killing off their inhabitants.

      It’s ok for them because they’re not Muslim. That makes it acceptable in your eyes. The hypocrisy of the west is astounding. They don’t care for the dead, they have wiped out millions of people from this world and still they continue to have blood on their hands. You think it’s bad have a look at the following statistics from the last century:

      1911: Chinese Revolution (2.4 million)
      1914-18: World War I (20 million)
      1916: Kyrgyz revolt against Russia (120,000)
      1917-21: Soviet revolution (5 million)
      1919-21: Poland vs Soviet Union (27,000)
      1928-37: Chinese civil war (2 million)
      1931: Japanese Manchurian War (1.1 million)
      1932-33: Soviet Union vs Ukraine (10 million)
      1932: “La Matanza” in El Salvador (30,000)
      1932-35: “Guerra del Chaco” between Bolivia and Paraguay (117.500)
      1934: Mao’s Long March (170,000)
      1936: Italy’s invasion of Ethiopia (200,000)
      1936-37: Stalin’s purges (13 million)
      1936-39: Spanish civil war (600,000)
      1937-45: Japanese invasion of China (500,000)
      1939-45: World War II (55 million) including holocaust and Chinese revolution
      1946-49: Chinese civil war (1.2 million)
      1946-54: France-Vietnam war (600,000)
      1947: Taiwan’s uprising against the Kuomintang (30,000)
      1948-1958: Colombian civil war (250,000)
      1949-50: Mainland China vs Tibet (1,200,000)
      1950-53: Korean war (3 million)
      1952-59: Kenya’s Mau Mau insurrection (20,000)
      1958-61: Mao’s “Great Leap Forward” (38 million)
      1962-75: Angolan FNLA & MPLA vs Portugal (50,000)
      1964-73: USA-Vietnam war (3 million)
      1966-69: Mao’s “Cultural Revolution” (11 million)
      1975-79: Khmer Rouge, Cambodia (1.7 million)
      1975-89: Boat people, Vietnam (250,000)
      1977-92: El Salvador’s civil war (75,000)
      1979: Vietnam-China war (30,000)
      1979-88: the Soviet Union invades Afghanistan (1.3 million)
      1989-: Uganda vs Lord’s Resistance Army (30,000)
      1991: Gulf War (85,000)
      1991-97: Congo’s civil war (800,000)
      1992-99: Algerian civil war (150,000)
      1993-97: Congo Brazzaville’s civil war (100,000)
      1994: Rwanda’s civil war (900,000)
      1998-: Congo/Zaire’s war – Rwanda and Uganda vs Zimbabwe, Angola and Namibia (3.8 million)
      1992-1995: Bosnia-Herzegovina (200,000)
      2001-: USA war in Afghanistan (40,000)
      2003-11: USA war in Iraq (500,000)

      People from all backgrounds and all faiths (or no faith) have killed innocent civilians. It’s time to comprehend that there are good and evil people from all backgrounds and faiths. It’s not limited to one group of people.

      • liz

        I didn’t say the Koran permitted human sacrifice – I simply noted that the bible forbids it. I didn’t say Jews and Christians never committed atrocities – I said they have since grown out of that barbaric stage, while Muslims haven’t.
        You say all Mohammed ever did was “defend” against the Meccans. That’s a lie. Mohammed was an aggressive megalomaniac and imperialist way beyond what any western countries ever were.
        The crap about “colonialism” is really tired leftist propaganda. You are a brainwashed dupe.

      • malinse

        You have proven the world lies in evil and darkness. But Jesus came to defeat the work of evil, and the Devil. And He is the only Way to escape the judgment of God. Any other way, such as Islam, cannot save you.

        13“Enter through the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is broad that leads to destruction, and there are many who enter through it. 14“For the gate is small and the way is narrow that leads to life, and there are few who find it.” Matthew 7:13-14

  • herb benty

    The “Left’s”, One World Government enforcers, Islam, needs to dominate all other religions. And the “Left”( commies ), paves the way. That’s the whole story in a nutshell. Putin wasn’t seeking oil or falafel when he made those trips to Teheran.

  • Ravn Rey
  • malinse

    The Bible is the true word of God. Why do you keep citing a socialist like George Bernard Shaw? Is he some sort of prophet to you also?

  • Higlac

    A PATENT LIE: what the Old Testament propounded of violence was restricted solely to Ancient Israel. It’s NOT open-ended in those commands; whereas the Qu’rân IS. [Also, you'll find the New Testament without all that violence.]

    We also know well the principle of abrogation whereby whole sections of the Qu’rân are voided in favour of others!!!

    No, you’ll NOT succeed in “pulling the wool over our eyes”!!! Again, take your kitman and taqiyya ELSEWHERE!!!!!

  • Richard

    FK THE TOWELHEADS LETS GO RAGHEAD HU NTING