Obama Blew $120 Billion on Global Warming


That’s more than twice the annual Social Security deficit. But who cares about the seniors when the world is about to end unless a whole bunch of campaign donors and their companies get piles of taxpayer money.

What could you do with 120 billion dollars? It’s enough money to buy an iPad for every kid in school, pay for a months worth of gas for every American or give a $323 tax rebate to every American.

It would be more than enough to revive the space program or actually fund the military.

Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said Wednesday at a hearing on the Defense Department’s Fiscal Year 2015 budget that President Barack Obama has wasted $120 billion on global warming over the past five years – money that would be better spent on the military.

“I’ve been working on this for quite some time … In the last five years, between 2009 and 2014, the president has spent $120 billion on the environmental agenda, mostly global warming, climate and that type of thing,” said Inhofe. “And in that respect, if you’ll just take the amount that was not authorized by Congress — and I’m talking about the environmental agenda, you could actually buy 1,400 F-35s.”

The F-35 Lightning II, made by Lockheed Martin, is considered the world’s most advanced multi-role fighter and “will enable pilots to be six to eight times more effective in air-to-air missions, air-to ground missions and surveillance missions.” It is “first to enter the battle space, has a 360-degree view of the battlefield and is first to see adversaries and take action – allowing our pilots to carry out their missions and return home safely.”

But who needs jets. They’re outdated technology like horses and bayonets. Instead our leaders have mastered the fine art of drawing red lines and then pretending that no one stepped over them.

  • oldfartAmerican

    We must return to the thinking of Ronald Reagan
    and “Peace through Strength!”

    • texan texan

      And facts to back the claim. Nuke Russia. Why not Iran as well Strength. Ollie north appears to be around to lead.

  • johnright61

    Such a blatant waste of taxpayer money that could have done a lot of good for the United States in other areas. Going on $18 Trillion in debt now with Obama racking up $8 Trillion so far and has three years left to probably make our debt around $22 Trillion. This amount is beyond our ability to ever pay it back. So totally irresponsible.

    • Pam Dunn

      a $323 tax rebate to every American. would have been a better solution, imagine the BOOST to the economy if HALF of the Americans went out and spent those funds.

      • bob machaffy

        i would have spent every penny ;-)

    • Dorseyclan

      The whole idea is to enslave us! Destroy the economy and the dollar as the world currency, that’s what Soros does best and O is obviously on board with the concept!

  • Bill

    We spend more on the military then the next 20 countries combined. And you think we would have been better off on more spending on the military! Must be a very low bar to get to be the Shillman Journalism Fellow.

    • joeupyours

      Spoken like a good little demoRAT,joeupyoursMF!

      • stonemike

        Bill and all his marxist “do-gooders” should be forcibly deported to the “socialist utopia” of his choice!

    • Pam Dunn

      BIll is a low level left winger moron thoroughly brain washed in school by “peacenics” from the Vietnam era.

      • siquijorisland

        that was my impression as well

    • silvernotes

      For me the point is not whether we spent it on SS or aircraft (which by the way IS a Constitutional requirement–defense of our nation), but that it got pissed away on an ideology that has no true basis in fact, and that even if it did have ANY effect, it would be a drop in the bucket in the big scheme. What we need to discuss is not what the money is spent on, as much as SAVING the money (not spending any money) to lower the deficit. Only when we secure the survivability of our nation can we begin to even discuss other mega projects.

      • Bill

        Maybe, you should look up the preamble of the constitution. Oh, can’t find it, here:
        We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more
        perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility,
        provide for the common defence, PROMOTE THE GENERAL WELFARE,
        and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity,
        do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States
        of America. The caps are mine.

        And by the way, you right wing nut jobs are what are called “low information voters”, as you all seem to be quite stupid. I have forgotten more than most of you have EVER known. Now shut up, I have to get back to the oscilloscope and figure out why I am having difficulty with the optical interrupter.

        • silvernotes

          Well there mister smarty pants…aren’t you perfect little Obamadrone, trying to employ the old intimidation tactic. Sorry pal, I’m one of the most informed voters you will find. Since you admitedly can’t operate the optical interrupter, why don’t you try reading the Federalist papers and the rest of the Constitution before you claim to be omnipotent. Promoting the general welfare refers to the United States and its citizens…..running deficits, pissing money away on fake global warming (oh sorry that was changed to “climate change” wasn’t it) programs and on unproven “green” technologies (Solindra comes to mind and many more) is not the promoting our country’s general’s welfare, just the opposite. So go to your room and have a hissy fit if you want…come back when you can have an intelligent and salient conversation. Oh, and by the way if you want to donate your own money to the global warming cause, be my guest and make Uncle Al Gore richer!

          • Bill

            Hard to argue with stupid, but, here goes. Solindra (sorry about your spelling) was started in the Bush Admin, look it up (here cause you are to stupid to find it:http://money.cnn.com/2012/06/06/technology/solyndra/). And regards global warming:

            (it has pictures, which means that even a knuckle scrapping slopehead like yourself can see it. Ask yourself where Gore hide those glaciers.

            And evolution isn’t a theory, it’s a fact. So, it would be impossible to have an intelligent discussion with you, because you are an idiot at worst, a moron at best, but more likely an imbecile. You probably aspire to be a moron, but you would fall short.

            And the founding fathers didn’t believe in any religious tests for people in Government. Thomas Jefferson had a copy of the Koran (Quran). Anyone can read the Federalist papers, sadly for you, that doesn’t imply you understand any of them.

            And lastly, I am not operating an optical interrupter, I am designing a circuit and computer program for use as an ECU for small engines.

            Don’t think too hard on any of this, you may hurt yourself.

          • silvernotes

            First, the DOA innovative technologies loan program that was going to fund Solyndra was started under Bush, but his administration never approved Solyndra’s loan application becasue it needed more work….Obummer’s administration approved it did knowing it had trouble. Here, I’ll help you out: http://money.cnn.com/2012/06/06/technology/solyndra/index.htm

            Second, nobody mentioned anything about evolution, and clearly it is off topic. ..another attempt at trying to belittle me…you’re pathetic.

            Third, most of the founding fathers were ministers, who went on to create most of the colleges/universities of the time. The “religious tests” you mentioned were actually built into the Constitution and our Judeo/Christian laws. if you actually knew something about them you would already know this. Please read the orginal documents and not the revised crap from the left.

            Lastly, I’ll see your climate change article with this one from a former NASA Climate Change PhD: http://www.drroyspencer.com/2014/02/how-much-weather-is-being-caused-by-climate-change-maybe-1-part-in-1000/
            There are a lot more world scientists who outnumber the few pushing climate change. Anybody on the coast would be under water by now if you believed the predictions from teh 1970’s.

            Now you can go back to trying to get you engine control unit to work on your little engines…

          • Bill

            1) http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2011/09/13/317594/timeline-bush-administration-solyndra-loan-guarantee/

            2) evolution – most of your ilk do not believe in evolution or science as far as that goes, usually is a perfect fit. Was I wrong? You didn’t admit to it one way or another. And because this piece of journalistic crap is about science, I was attempting to find out if you know how to spell it. As far as belittling, I think a good place to start is your very first reply to me.


            Paragraph 5, near the end seems to enumerate the number that were clergy.

            4) From NASA’s own web page:
            Can you find outliers, there are some. But most who actually study climate are in agreement, climate change is real.

            Of course, you could say my sources are wrong. Every nut job knows you should not trust the National Archives or NASA, they are Government agencies after all. One last observation, you claim to know things that you obviously don’t. How does that reality make you feel? (yes, I am belittling you again. Just reread your first reply to me. You are still the imbecile in this conversation). GLTU.
            (ps. ecu coming along, thought you would be happy for me to know that)

          • silvernotes

            1.) Your article confirms what I already said.

            2.) Let me say it again, evolution is off

            Go back to original documents instead of edited publications that like to try
            and re-write history…what I said is true. Here is a site that references
            original docs:
            Founding Fathers


            Tell the whole
            truth, the often quoted 97% consensus on global warming is based on a 1-3 %
            respondent rate from an IPCC survey, and of them, there was “no agreement with a
            catastrophic view.” The
            Oreskes (2004) study claimed only 1.2% or 13 scientists out of 1,117
            agreed with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) view that human
            activity is the main cause of global warming since 1950.

            is clear that global warming activists will do anything to spend our (my) money
            on something they can’t honestly prove (as proven in the past). Other studies
            have shown that we couldn’t even materially effect the earth’s temperature even
            after spending trillions of dollars. Realistically speaking climate change
            happens naturally every 10,000 years or so, there is nothing we can do to stop
            it. There hasn’t been any material change in temperatures for 15 years. Spend
            your own money if you want on your convictions, don’t expect the rest of us to
            be fooled too.

            Is it working yet????

          • Bill

            1) “What critics fail to mention is that the Solyndra deal is more than
            three years old, started under the Bush Administration, which tried to
            conditionally approve the loan right before Obama took office. Rather
            than “pushing funds out the door too quickly,” the Obama Administration
            restructured the original loan when it came into office to further
            protect the taxpayers’ investment.”

            Seems like Obama did a prudent thing. Also, Solyndra was a victim of Chinese dumping.

            2) Sorry, but your evolution views are germane to the discussion of science. If your faith is not strong enough to discuss evolution, then say so. It’s a simple question, do believe in evolution or not.

            3) Funny, you seem to want to discuss the founding fathers, which has nothing to do with science. And regards to your link. I gave you a spot on link written by scholars at the national archives. You give me a generic link the a group that are a right wing religious group, the very group whose integrity is in question. Please. Here, this is what others think of wallbuilders:

            4) Maybe, English is a second language for you. I read the transcript of Oreskes 2004 study. You certainly don’t have a eye for what the printed word says:


            “Many details about climate interactions are not well understood, and
            there are ample grounds for continued research to provide
            a better basis for understanding climate dynamics.
            The question of what to do about climate change is also still open. But
            there is a scientific consensus on the reality of
            anthropogenic climate change. Climate scientists have repeatedly tried
            make this clear. It is time for the rest of us to

            these are the exact words of your cited person Oreskes in the report YOU cite. Funny, the last paragraph of any writing is the most important. So, as such, mine will say you are still lacking in scientific knowledge. You should realize you know little of science and probably less of the Founding Fathers. And you probably aren’t paying a penny for global warming.

          • silvernotes

            1.) The article is self explanatory. ..keep working on your excuses. The government doesn’t belong investing in the market, no matter what party, and certainly not with my money…period!
            2.) blah blah
            3.) you brought up the Constitution and “religious tests”…I know, let’s say the party line together “I don’t recall” or would you plead the 5th?
            4.) ..again with the smart mouth, you just don’t learn. You clearly aren’t a scientist or you would respect the positions of others, so I don’t value your opinion about me.

            My final paragraph, savor your ability to speak freely. With Obamadrones like you, that right (amoung others) is going right down the tube. As for “paying a penny for global warming” you again show your ignorance….try getting on the EPA site and see what they are doing, or reading the news, and looking at your latest electric bill. Do the rest of us adults a favor and stick to your ECU and stay out of the voting booth.

          • Bill

            You are not pleading the fifth, rather you seem to be pleading ignorance. As is often said, You don’t know Jack Schitt. You want to be taken seriously, then stick with things you know (whatever you think that might be) for you certainly know nothing of science. Sleep well tonight. It is said ignorance is bliss, I don’t know about paranoia.

          • siquijorisland

            more name calling again and you still do nt get it.

          • siquijorisland

            more name calling

          • siquijorisland

            here you are name calling

        • siquijorisland

          Who are you call people name you left wing nut.
          and by the way you appear to be a low information thinker.

          i am surprised that someone as intelligent as yourself can not understand “provide for the common defense”
          why trouble with an optical interrupter that you can not see on your oscilloscope, not very impressed.

          • Bill

            I understand the general welfare part. Maybe you should read just a few more words of the preamble. And, it looks like the vast majority who post here are right wing nut jobs, like yourself. Maybe the country should heed the words of General Eisenhower to beware of the military industrial complex. Of course he was probably a left leaning commie like me.

          • siquijorisland

            you seem to not understand the simple question Who are you call people names?

            Have you heard of the Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group? they have been systematically attempting “to control, infiltrate, manipulate, and warp online discourse”. I find this type of activity deeply disturbing.

          • Bill

            Maybe you should look at my original post and those that followed it (yours included). Then ask yourself, who is calling who names? If you cant see that I was blasted for saying that using 120b in increased military spending stupid, then you are not very bright. How’s island life treating you anyhow? And I wouldn’t call your contribution to this discussion enlightening. The Group to which you refer is British. Any misinformation around here is strictly the fault of the author and the right wing posters who live in a parallel universe.

          • siquijorisland

            you misinformation is amazing please do not wast (waste) my time.
            can you not understand this request

          • siquijorisland

            and more name calling yes British Canadian and American all working together

          • siquijorisland

            what part of do not wast (waste) my time do you not understand?

          • siquijorisland

            bill as you misinformation is amazing evidence of misinofrmation please do not wast (waste) my time.

    • dove1

      I’d rather “invest” in paying OFF THE DEBT. But having a military that the world FEARS is why we have had relative PEACE since WWII. Bill, have you ever seen a war? Your high school (that is about it, I am pretty sure) must have a low bar of history study, government, communism, etc. and you, a low bar of experience, empathy for the oppressed, patriotism, etc., etc., etc. But hang in there. you are about to get educated! Talk about unsustainable – that be we!

    • olddawg1

      “We spend more on the military “then” (sic) the next 20 countries combined”? Bill, you are obviously an excellent journalist yourself.

      • Bill

        Twenty may be high, but I include the off budget portions that have funded the Iraq and Afghan wars. You did know that those cost were not a part of the military budget didn’t you. Yea, seems they wanted to separate those out of the military budget to make the whole thing look better. And I don’t think they include the cost of the VA in there either.


    • Dorseyclan

      We had better with the likes of China, Russia, North Korea, Iran need I go on!

  • Albert M. Bliss

    Please look at the objectives of Agenda 21 regarding sustainability and then decide if this does not add credibility to Obama’s quest of socialism.

  • annie1945

    Bill: Just so you understand we spend more on the military because we take care of our allies and other countries. Must be a very low bar to post on this web site.

    • stonemike

      Annie, just so you understand, without the best military on Earth, the real bad guys will devour “our naive nation” ! At least money spent on military is usually going to American business, this money given to obammis “radical environmentalist co-conspirators” will go directly into the effort to destroy capitalism and our Constitutional Republic! But, just to set the record straight, we should have an independent “citizens board” made up of average Americans to scrutinize ALL EXPENDITURES of our” unamerican federal govt :! But as we know that aint gonna happen , govt and especially these “educated idiots from the LEFT” consider Americans to all be imbeciles !

    • elmcqueen3

      Low bar?…I don’t consider $120 billion dollars a low bar in defense of climate change…Besides even if we in the US were able to erase our carbon footprints…It wouldn’t help global warming one iota…Unless the whole world were a participant…And I don’t see that happening until the end of times…By then the Sun will have changed our earth into another ice age…So why worry!

    • truebearing

      “Must be a very low bar to post on this web site.”

      Apparently. You made it over the bar.

  • truebearing

    What would I do with $120 billion dollars? Send all of the Heatists to Antarctica, on a one way mission to escape the oppressive temperatures that the rest of us enjoy. Once there, these over-heated whiners would learn to survive on ice algae, worship the Carbon god, pray for more SUV’s, and sing songs about the wonders of oil and gas.

    • ddl


    • olddawg1

      You may recall that some of them recently attempted a trip to Antarctica, for the specific purpose of documenting the decrease in coverage of polar ice. Unfortunately, their ship got stuck due to the increase in coverage of polar ice. This led to millions of dollars (thankfully not all U.S. tax dollars this time) being spent to rescue them so they could continue their important work of proving the decrease in coverage of polar ice…

      • truebearing

        Yes, I remember it well. Another banner day for the delusional fools who insist on believing their own lies.

    • Capt Bob

      You wouldn’t have 62,000 Homeless American Veterans cold and hungry on the streets of the US.

  • texan texan

    There are no facts in this article to back up claim. I would think facts would be nice. But claims are nice also.

    • Pam Dunn

      The moron New York Transplant to teas spews his load of stupidity and thoroughly demonstrates his lack of understanding and ability to think.

    • oldfartAmerican

      texan texan,
      Give us an example of any of these companies still in business.
      We’re waiting…

      • stonemike

        Obammi will be maybe the richest “criminal on Earth when the kickbacks start comming back to his bank account after he leaves office! This RACIST has achieved the dream of all racist blacks, HE HAS MADE WHITEY PAY DEARLY !

    • dove1

      The US debt is a fact about to hit us all up side the head. Spending since GW hasn’t relieved any pain, but the deficit spending has delayed some but worsened the pain when it arrives. Flushed the USA right down the old toilet bowl – his (and his father’s) dream come true. AND, that is a fact, jack!

  • gonaes

    How in the hell can that man in the White House sleep at night when he knows he squandered all that money on global warming when it’s still not proven global warming is a fact. The fact is the whole subject is political. And Obama doesn’t give a damn how much taxpayer’s money he spends.

  • USAVeteran

    Well, at least the Environment is finally Fixed!… What???, it hasn’t even made any difference?
    Scientists can’t create a Rain Storm, let alone a Drizzle, so why would throwing money at the Environmental Problem make any difference?
    Obummer is our ENEMY!

  • stonemike

    The obama administration is the most lucrative “organized crime syndicate” in world history ! Buteven the bigger crime is “WHY IS THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROPRIATING OUR MONEY TO THESE RADICALS!? obammi is a common thief! And our Congress is now in “full collusion”!

  • Bill Catering

    What a total waste of money on a theory that man can stop global warming or global change! There are no factors that price that restricting carbon will cure the worlds tempurtures changes❗️

    • stonemike

      GOT NOTHING TO DO WITH CLIMATE, enslavement of all FREE MEN is the “end game!’ Socialism never leaves from being out voted, the US will see revolution to rid itself of ‘leftist dicktators like obammi!

    • dove1

      They decided to leave real scientists and economists out of the decision-making.

  • Roy Mallmann

    We should take “global warming” and it’s supporters to court where, since only facts are considered and “what ifs” and “could happens”, do not count, so it will be exposed as a total sham, and charge its perpetrators with fraud, which gives you the right to assess treble damages. Is there global temperature change? You are darnn right there is but it has never in millions of years been enough of a problem to where it could be changed by humans. If we assumed that these “ingnoranti” were right, a temperature increase of 1 degree over a 70 year period is harmless. These people are nut cases and have an excuse to tie “global warming” to every issue possible at the drop of a hat. We need to stop this hysteria once and for all and sue its proponents for all of the damage teir ignorance has caused.

  • Capt Parker

    If congress DID NOT AUTHORIZE the money ….. who the hell did?
    The Usurper Obama does not have the authority to allocate or spend that kind of money.

  • Barry Smith

    What would I do with 120 billion dollars. I would by the biggest island I could find and start my own country using the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution for rules of law and no other laws, then let anyone who wants to come along can come. We work start all over like THIS COUNTRY was intended to be.

  • gonaes

    It has been one of the severest winters across the United States. That certainly posses a question about global warming. Is Obama going to continue to pour more taxpayer’s money into global warming

  • John

    In reality Congress has wasted this money. Members of Congress requested this money and whatever bill it was attached to was sent to Obama for signing. Members of Congress have no clue when it comes to science and those who advise them usually are not experts either. Just like the mindless slaughter of wolves currently going on which is not even based on science.

  • 4bills4

    I guess some people Just think O is great in fact he is the biggest spender of
    all and most of it goes to the democrat Ideas which are giving money away for
    anything they think might work .. But we know it will fail because our government
    does not know how to work that includes all of them… the worst is now in charge.

  • Matthew G. Zatkalik

    On May 16 in Washington, DC there is an Operation American Spring. Billed as ‘The Most Important Protest In US History.’ The question being raised is this: If the Egyptians Can Force a Tyrant Out – Why Can’t We?’ It is a credit to our Secret Service and the American Military branches that there has not been a uprising against Obama.

    The question to consider, though: Where will the Secret Service and military stand when the American people act to free themselves from this tyrant and the entrenched career politicians who participate in the destruction of our Republic by and for the People.

    Obama will continue to do what he has done. He has the support of his minions, the lame-stream media and its politics, politics and more politics. Politics – per the Smothers Brothers: ‘poly’ Greek root meaning many; ‘ticks’ a bunch of blood-sucking parasites. I For Obama – Investigate Obama, Interrogate Obama, Isolate Obama, Impeach Obama, Imprison Obama. Fumigate the White House

  • jon

    You know what the biggest waste in this country is? Obama. PERIOD.

  • amerigom

    Obama; (Or whatever his name is), blew $120 billion on global warming! He also “blew” $840 billion on the Stimulus! And that is NOT including the raise in the debt “Limit”! AND; there has been NO accounting for any “Blowing”! How about that for a closed corporation?,,However he had “40 minutes of terror”, on the golf course, while Bin Laden was being murdered! He was also “uninformed’ about the Benghazi Affair! His appointee’s didn’t gat any information about the “Benghazi Affair”! No one in the entire administration had ANY knowledge about anything! BUT; this administration is spying on it’s citizens! They intercept all communications, from all CITIZENS! Where are the priorities? However; Mr. Obama; (Or whatever his name is), will make another “speech”, and alibi his way out of any responsibility! AND; his opposition?; they roll over and play dead!
    GOD: Bless America! In GOD We Trust!

  • barto

    Obama and his minions don’t give a damn about the American citizens for whom they (are supposed) to work. They have wasted enough of our tax dollars to have paid off our national debt since they have been in power, so let us (their employers) fire them!

  • obadiahorthodox

    $120,000,000,000 could house every homeless person in America

  • aelcad3

    If it’s “not authorized by Congress”…where did he get the authority to disperse money? Who gave him a checkbook??? I don’t understand… Congress holds the purse…so is he diverting money from funds that he does have say-so on, and then asking Congress to refund the fund he depleted???

  • 44guyton

    There are currently 33 “green” companies given subsides that are bankrupt or in serious financial trouble. So we know the Americam taxpayers got the shaft. The question is what did the Democrat Party receive? Financial kickbacks in the form of donations, croney capitialism and the continued “climate change” B.S. that is the justification for this fraud!!

  • Harold

    How much would Obama and MOOOOOChels constant vacations add up to? Put the two together and we each would get even more of OUR. money back!

  • bjedwards

    how much hemp rope can we buy with that, and is there a good solid tree located near the whitehouse….

  • fistdeyuma

    Since this is the biggest scam in history I’m not shocked at the numbers. I expect they might add a few zeros before they are done and people wise up to the scheme.
    Going to take a while because much of the money is being spent on bribes and “studies” to keep the public ignorant. If the MSM did their jobs, instead of being a lap dog to the Liberals, this would never have gotten off the ground.

  • GovChildConfiscation

    and trollies are a sufficient solution for our dependence on oil. Some
    say trains and trollies were intentionally eliminated by oil producers
    to enrich their pockets. Global warming is also a money maker for them.
    Solar and wind are dismal solutions. But geothermal is viable, the
    technology is ready, its completely scalable ..despite what our city
    engineers misunderstand and then misdirect us at their public hearings. The solutions are
    right in front of us but our legislators and media will doom us for
    decades of more $$$ (gov’t contracts).

    Obama’s waste of so much money breaks my heart into a thousand pieces. I live on less than 10K a year. The elite of this country have sucked the life blood from us. They live high while they take this nation down with nary a care for tomorrow.

    • Dorseyclan

      I agree that Americans can resolve our energy independence problem if the government would encourage it. We need to use all forms of energy to stop buying foreign oil, we just enrich our enemies. Personally I think oil and gas are a God send! I don’t follow the crowd believing oil and gas are evil. Those that do but who use the heck out of it, like our POTUS are hypocrites when they make it our as something bad. They fly all over the planet on vacations, send their dog on a separate jet but want to take our money and freedom for a carbon tax! Same thing for coal, we were blessed with it, it is plentiful and it provides jobs for those who aren’t scared of working hard but this evil government demonizes it for their own agenda. I have made a living bring oil and gas to America, hands on underwater offshore but I am barely making a living now, m work has dwindled over the last five years! Everything Ozero does is to ruin our economy, our heritage, our way of life, our freedom!

  • Capt Bob

    How about all the money he is wasting going to Fla for Golf

  • DBinder

    He just loves to use our money to keep his donors happy.

  • Dorseyclan

    Evil is spending our children’s future before they are even born and millions who have been born, all for power, greed and to steal our freedom! Washington DC is influenced by evil!

    It was only a few years ago in 2010 I believe the earth had its coldest day EVER recorded, something like 138 degree Fahrenheit below zero.

  • johnright61

    Totally bewildering why the President of the United States wants to destroy the country he leads. Oh, that’s right, the Founding Fathers wanted “Natural Born Citizens” “of the United States” so their allegiance is to the one Country they lead, but a man born in Kenya, who isn’t even a U.S. Citizen, with a fake SS#, forged Selective Service Card and Forged Birth Certificate was elected.

  • gomurr

    Looks like someone is bound and determined to melt that ice in the Antarctic. Must really piss them off, that even with help, they aren’t disappearing like Al promised.


  • putupjob

    the warmers want a LOT MORE than that.
    They want 200 billion a year from the US.

    • 20pizzapies

      It’s actually $ 770 Million . Wher did you get your figures ? From Ben Shapiro ?

  • 20pizzapies

    Hey Mr.Inhofe the F-35 has got a slight problem , the wings are cracking . And how much did we waste on that project ?

  • 20pizzapies

    Total cost of the F-35 Program ? $ 1.2 Trillion…..you read that right , $1.2 TRILLION , and it don’t even work right yet .

  • 20pizzapies

    $120 Billion ? Mr. Inhofe is playing with funny math : Congressional Research Service [ CRS ]

    According to CRS, the government has spent a total of $2.5 billion on GCCI since 2010 on overseas anti-global warming efforts in Latin America, Asia, and Africa. For 2013, the Obama administration has requested an additional $770 million for its policy, a figure that if approved by Congress would bring total foreign climate change spending to $3.3 billion. The administration uses the money to fund three types of anti-global warming foreign aid: adaptation, clean energy, and sustainable landscapes. – See more at: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-requests-770-million-fight-global-warming-overseas#sthash.NrRWnKtr.dpuf

  • Paul454

    And to think of those bozo impersonators on the Senate floor arguing for this make-believe bs! I suspect that not one of them really gives a &^%$ about the environment anyway, however a carbon tax bank to continue plundering the American electorate for liberal jackass spending habits does make a lot of sense to those who dig Communism and control! Al Gore’s ridiculous movie cannot even be shown anywhere in England’s school system now unless the 9 scientific errors (of the 35) are pre-announced to the school children, yet I would wager that not one of the know-nothings on the Senate floor could name a single one of them! Throw them out on their bloated asses.

  • lovesvacations

    Outrageous spending with nothing to show for it. Who in this country
    could not think of so many better ways to spend this money we do not
    really have to spend?