<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Blew $120 Billion on Global Warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 03:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: siquijorisland</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-5384863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[siquijorisland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 05:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220836#comment-5384863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what part of do not wast (waste) my time do you not understand?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what part of do not wast (waste) my time do you not understand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: siquijorisland</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-5384861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[siquijorisland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 04:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220836#comment-5384861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and more name calling yes British Canadian and American all working together]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and more name calling yes British Canadian and American all working together</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: siquijorisland</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-5384860</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[siquijorisland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 04:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220836#comment-5384860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you misinformation is amazing please do not wast (waste) my time.
can you not understand this request]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you misinformation is amazing please do not wast (waste) my time.<br />
can you not understand this request</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: siquijorisland</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-5384859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[siquijorisland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 04:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220836#comment-5384859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[more name calling again and you still do nt get it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more name calling again and you still do nt get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: siquijorisland</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-5384858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[siquijorisland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 04:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220836#comment-5384858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[more name calling]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more name calling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: siquijorisland</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-5384857</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[siquijorisland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 04:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220836#comment-5384857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[here you are name calling]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here you are name calling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lovesvacations</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-5384399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lovesvacations]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220836#comment-5384399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outrageous spending with nothing to show for it.  Who in this country 
could not think of so many better ways to spend this money we do not 
really have to spend?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outrageous spending with nothing to show for it.  Who in this country<br />
could not think of so many better ways to spend this money we do not<br />
really have to spend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-5384206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220836#comment-5384206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe you should look at my original post and those that followed it (yours included). Then ask yourself, who is calling who names? If you cant see that I was blasted for saying that using 120b in increased military spending stupid, then you are not very bright. How&#039;s island life treating you anyhow? And I wouldn&#039;t call your contribution to this discussion enlightening. The Group to which you refer is British. Any misinformation around here is strictly the fault of the author and the right wing posters who live in a parallel universe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you should look at my original post and those that followed it (yours included). Then ask yourself, who is calling who names? If you cant see that I was blasted for saying that using 120b in increased military spending stupid, then you are not very bright. How&#8217;s island life treating you anyhow? And I wouldn&#8217;t call your contribution to this discussion enlightening. The Group to which you refer is British. Any misinformation around here is strictly the fault of the author and the right wing posters who live in a parallel universe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: siquijorisland</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-5384154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[siquijorisland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 06:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220836#comment-5384154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bill as you misinformation is amazing evidence of misinofrmation please do not wast (waste) my time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bill as you misinformation is amazing evidence of misinofrmation please do not wast (waste) my time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: siquijorisland</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-5384150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[siquijorisland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220836#comment-5384150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you seem to not understand the simple question Who are you call people names? 

Have you heard of the Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group? they have been systematically attempting “to control, infiltrate, manipulate, and warp online discourse”. I find this type of activity deeply disturbing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you seem to not understand the simple question Who are you call people names? </p>
<p>Have you heard of the Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group? they have been systematically attempting “to control, infiltrate, manipulate, and warp online discourse”. I find this type of activity deeply disturbing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: siquijorisland</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-5384151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[siquijorisland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220836#comment-5384151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[that was my impression as well]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that was my impression as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-5384043</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220836#comment-5384043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are not pleading the fifth, rather you seem to be pleading ignorance. As is often said, You don&#039;t know Jack Schitt. You want to be taken seriously, then stick with things you know (whatever you think that might be) for you certainly know nothing of science. Sleep well tonight. It is said ignorance is bliss, I don&#039;t know about  paranoia.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are not pleading the fifth, rather you seem to be pleading ignorance. As is often said, You don&#8217;t know Jack Schitt. You want to be taken seriously, then stick with things you know (whatever you think that might be) for you certainly know nothing of science. Sleep well tonight. It is said ignorance is bliss, I don&#8217;t know about  paranoia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silvernotes</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-5384029</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[silvernotes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 23:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220836#comment-5384029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1.) The article is self explanatory. ..keep working on your excuses. The government doesn&#039;t belong investing in the market, no matter what party, and certainly not with my money...period!
2.) blah blah
3.) you brought up the Constitution and &quot;religious tests&quot;...I know, let&#039;s say the party line together  &quot;I don&#039;t recall&quot; or would you plead the 5th?
4.) ..again with the smart mouth, you just don&#039;t learn. You clearly aren&#039;t a scientist or you would respect the positions of  others, so I don&#039;t value your opinion about me.

My final paragraph, savor your ability to speak freely. With Obamadrones like you, that right (amoung others) is going right down the tube. As for &quot;paying a penny for global warming&quot; you again show your ignorance....try getting on the EPA site and see what they are doing, or reading the news, and looking at your latest electric bill. Do the rest of us adults a favor and stick to your ECU and stay out of the voting booth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.) The article is self explanatory. ..keep working on your excuses. The government doesn&#8217;t belong investing in the market, no matter what party, and certainly not with my money&#8230;period!<br />
2.) blah blah<br />
3.) you brought up the Constitution and &#8220;religious tests&#8221;&#8230;I know, let&#8217;s say the party line together  &#8220;I don&#8217;t recall&#8221; or would you plead the 5th?<br />
4.) ..again with the smart mouth, you just don&#8217;t learn. You clearly aren&#8217;t a scientist or you would respect the positions of  others, so I don&#8217;t value your opinion about me.</p>
<p>My final paragraph, savor your ability to speak freely. With Obamadrones like you, that right (amoung others) is going right down the tube. As for &#8220;paying a penny for global warming&#8221; you again show your ignorance&#8230;.try getting on the EPA site and see what they are doing, or reading the news, and looking at your latest electric bill. Do the rest of us adults a favor and stick to your ECU and stay out of the voting booth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-5384014</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 22:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220836#comment-5384014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1) &quot;What critics fail to mention is that the Solyndra deal is more than 
three years old, started under the Bush Administration, which tried to 
conditionally approve the loan right before Obama took office. Rather 
than “pushing funds out the door too quickly,” the Obama Administration 
restructured the original loan when it came into office to further 
protect the taxpayers’ investment.&quot;

    Seems like Obama did a prudent thing. Also, Solyndra was a victim of Chinese dumping.  

2) Sorry, but your evolution views are germane to the discussion of science. If your faith is not strong enough to discuss evolution, then say so. It&#039;s a simple question, do believe in evolution or not.

 3) Funny, you seem to want to discuss the founding fathers, which has nothing to do with science. And regards to your link. I gave you a spot on link written by scholars at the national archives. You give me a generic link the a group that are a right wing religious group, the very group whose integrity is in question. Please.   Here, this is what others think of wallbuilders:
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/category/organizations/wallbuilders

4) Maybe, English is a second language for you. I read the transcript of Oreskes 2004 study. You certainly don&#039;t have a eye for what the printed word says:
   
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/306/5702/1686.full

&quot;Many details about climate interactions are not well understood, and 
there are ample grounds for continued research to provide
                     a better basis for understanding climate dynamics. 
The question of what to do about climate change is also still open. But
                     there is a scientific consensus on the reality of 
anthropogenic climate change. Climate scientists have repeatedly tried 
to
                     make this clear. It is time for the rest of us to 
listen.
                  &quot;  

these are the exact words of your cited person Oreskes in the report YOU cite. Funny, the last paragraph of any writing is the most important. So, as such, mine will say you are still lacking in scientific knowledge. You should realize you know little of science and probably less of the Founding Fathers. And you probably aren&#039;t paying a penny for global warming.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) &#8220;What critics fail to mention is that the Solyndra deal is more than<br />
three years old, started under the Bush Administration, which tried to<br />
conditionally approve the loan right before Obama took office. Rather<br />
than “pushing funds out the door too quickly,” the Obama Administration<br />
restructured the original loan when it came into office to further<br />
protect the taxpayers’ investment.&#8221;</p>
<p>    Seems like Obama did a prudent thing. Also, Solyndra was a victim of Chinese dumping.  </p>
<p>2) Sorry, but your evolution views are germane to the discussion of science. If your faith is not strong enough to discuss evolution, then say so. It&#8217;s a simple question, do believe in evolution or not.</p>
<p> 3) Funny, you seem to want to discuss the founding fathers, which has nothing to do with science. And regards to your link. I gave you a spot on link written by scholars at the national archives. You give me a generic link the a group that are a right wing religious group, the very group whose integrity is in question. Please.   Here, this is what others think of wallbuilders:<br />
<a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/category/organizations/wallbuilders" rel="nofollow">http://www.rightwingwatch.org/category/organizations/wallbuilders</a></p>
<p>4) Maybe, English is a second language for you. I read the transcript of Oreskes 2004 study. You certainly don&#8217;t have a eye for what the printed word says:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/content/306/5702/1686.full" rel="nofollow">http://www.sciencemag.org/content/306/5702/1686.full</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Many details about climate interactions are not well understood, and<br />
there are ample grounds for continued research to provide<br />
                     a better basis for understanding climate dynamics.<br />
The question of what to do about climate change is also still open. But<br />
                     there is a scientific consensus on the reality of<br />
anthropogenic climate change. Climate scientists have repeatedly tried<br />
to<br />
                     make this clear. It is time for the rest of us to<br />
listen.<br />
                  &#8221;  </p>
<p>these are the exact words of your cited person Oreskes in the report YOU cite. Funny, the last paragraph of any writing is the most important. So, as such, mine will say you are still lacking in scientific knowledge. You should realize you know little of science and probably less of the Founding Fathers. And you probably aren&#8217;t paying a penny for global warming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silvernotes</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-5383980</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[silvernotes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220836#comment-5383980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1.) Your article confirms what I already said.

2.) Let me say it again, evolution is off 
topic...focus!!

3.) 
Go back to original documents instead of edited publications that like to try 
and re-write history...what I said is true. Here is a site that references 
original docs:
http://www.wallbuilders.com/libissuesarticles.asp?id=100766#America’s 
Founding Fathers

4.) 
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/02/debunking_the_97_consensus_on_global_warming.html

Tell the whole 
truth, the often quoted 97% consensus on global warming is based on a 1-3 % 
respondent rate from an IPCC survey, and of them, there was &quot;no agreement with a 
catastrophic view.&quot; The 
Oreskes (2004) study claimed only 1.2% or 13 scientists out of 1,117 
agreed with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) view that human 
activity is the main cause of global warming since 1950.

It 
is clear that global warming activists will do anything to spend our (my) money 
on something they can&#039;t honestly prove (as proven in the past). Other studies 
have shown that we couldn&#039;t even materially effect the earth&#039;s temperature even 
after spending trillions of dollars. Realistically speaking climate change 
happens naturally every 10,000 years or so, there is nothing we can do to stop 
it. There hasn&#039;t been any material change in temperatures for 15 years. Spend 
your own money if you want on your convictions, don&#039;t expect the rest of us to 
be fooled too.



Is it working yet????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.) Your article confirms what I already said.</p>
<p>2.) Let me say it again, evolution is off<br />
topic&#8230;focus!!</p>
<p>3.)<br />
Go back to original documents instead of edited publications that like to try<br />
and re-write history&#8230;what I said is true. Here is a site that references<br />
original docs:<br />
<a href="http://www.wallbuilders.com/libissuesarticles.asp?id=100766#America’s" rel="nofollow">http://www.wallbuilders.com/libissuesarticles.asp?id=100766#America’s</a><br />
Founding Fathers</p>
<p>4.)<br />
<a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/02/debunking_the_97_consensus_on_global_warming.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/02/debunking_the_97_consensus_on_global_warming.html</a></p>
<p>Tell the whole<br />
truth, the often quoted 97% consensus on global warming is based on a 1-3 %<br />
respondent rate from an IPCC survey, and of them, there was &#8220;no agreement with a<br />
catastrophic view.&#8221; The<br />
Oreskes (2004) study claimed only 1.2% or 13 scientists out of 1,117<br />
agreed with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) view that human<br />
activity is the main cause of global warming since 1950.</p>
<p>It<br />
is clear that global warming activists will do anything to spend our (my) money<br />
on something they can&#8217;t honestly prove (as proven in the past). Other studies<br />
have shown that we couldn&#8217;t even materially effect the earth&#8217;s temperature even<br />
after spending trillions of dollars. Realistically speaking climate change<br />
happens naturally every 10,000 years or so, there is nothing we can do to stop<br />
it. There hasn&#8217;t been any material change in temperatures for 15 years. Spend<br />
your own money if you want on your convictions, don&#8217;t expect the rest of us to<br />
be fooled too.</p>
<p>Is it working yet????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 20pizzapies</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-5383976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[20pizzapies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220836#comment-5383976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s actually $ 770 Million . Wher did you get your figures ? From Ben Shapiro ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s actually $ 770 Million . Wher did you get your figures ? From Ben Shapiro ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 20pizzapies</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-5383975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[20pizzapies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 21:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220836#comment-5383975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[$120 Billion ? Mr. Inhofe is playing with funny math :  Congressional Research Service [ CRS ] 

According to CRS, the government has spent a total of $2.5 billion on GCCI since 2010 on overseas anti-global warming efforts in Latin America, Asia, and Africa. For 2013, the Obama administration has requested an additional $770 million for its policy, a figure that if approved by Congress would bring total foreign climate change spending to $3.3 billion. The administration uses the money to fund three types of anti-global warming foreign aid: adaptation, clean energy, and sustainable landscapes. - See more at: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-requests-770-million-fight-global-warming-overseas#sthash.NrRWnKtr.dpuf]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$120 Billion ? Mr. Inhofe is playing with funny math :  Congressional Research Service [ CRS ] </p>
<p>According to CRS, the government has spent a total of $2.5 billion on GCCI since 2010 on overseas anti-global warming efforts in Latin America, Asia, and Africa. For 2013, the Obama administration has requested an additional $770 million for its policy, a figure that if approved by Congress would bring total foreign climate change spending to $3.3 billion. The administration uses the money to fund three types of anti-global warming foreign aid: adaptation, clean energy, and sustainable landscapes. &#8211; See more at: <a href="http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-requests-770-million-fight-global-warming-overseas#sthash.NrRWnKtr.dpuf" rel="nofollow">http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-requests-770-million-fight-global-warming-overseas#sthash.NrRWnKtr.dpuf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 20pizzapies</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-5383969</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[20pizzapies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 21:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220836#comment-5383969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Total  cost of the F-35 Program ? $ 1.2 Trillion.....you read that right , $1.2 TRILLION , and it don&#039;t even work right yet .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Total  cost of the F-35 Program ? $ 1.2 Trillion&#8230;..you read that right , $1.2 TRILLION , and it don&#8217;t even work right yet .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 20pizzapies</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-5383965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[20pizzapies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220836#comment-5383965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Mr.Inhofe the F-35 has got a slight problem , the wings are cracking .  And how much did we waste on that project ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mr.Inhofe the F-35 has got a slight problem , the wings are cracking .  And how much did we waste on that project ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: putupjob</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-blew-120-billion-on-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-5383580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[putupjob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=220836#comment-5383580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the warmers want a LOT MORE than that. 
They want 200 billion a year from the US.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the warmers want a LOT MORE than that.<br />
They want 200 billion a year from the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 773/810 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-29 22:24:14 by W3 Total Cache -->