<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Praises Muslims in Easter Message</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 04:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Hobgood</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message/comment-page-1/#comment-5440350</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Hobgood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2014 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223805#comment-5440350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kinda difficult to love your neighbor when he&#039;s tryng to rape you wife and daughter and decapitate you!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kinda difficult to love your neighbor when he&#8217;s tryng to rape you wife and daughter and decapitate you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chavi Beck</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message/comment-page-1/#comment-5404734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chavi Beck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223805#comment-5404734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Make sure to listen to his Rosh Hashana and Passover messages. THey&#039;re all about asking world Muslims for forgiveness and repenting Israel&#039;s wicked ways. And stopping to oppress those poor Palestinian victims.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make sure to listen to his Rosh Hashana and Passover messages. THey&#8217;re all about asking world Muslims for forgiveness and repenting Israel&#8217;s wicked ways. And stopping to oppress those poor Palestinian victims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opinari</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message/comment-page-1/#comment-5404205</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Opinari]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223805#comment-5404205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama is our recompense for voting for rhetoric rather than using good sense; electing someone with no substance, possibly voting for their color or charisma.  Then in one of his first speeches in another country he immediately puts down the USA as a bad country, apologizing for his perceived damage done to them, never praising the good we have done.  Obama is an abomination, a wart on our country…he is not a patriot
.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is our recompense for voting for rhetoric rather than using good sense; electing someone with no substance, possibly voting for their color or charisma.  Then in one of his first speeches in another country he immediately puts down the USA as a bad country, apologizing for his perceived damage done to them, never praising the good we have done.  Obama is an abomination, a wart on our country…he is not a patriot<br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2jackets</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message/comment-page-1/#comment-5403873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[2jackets]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223805#comment-5403873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He&#039;s a christian-hating, taqiyya spouting, gay muslin fundamentalist who wishes to institute sharia law (by means of stealth jihad of course) with the eventual goal of destroying America with ... I dunno, gay marriage or something.
Not difficult to understand is it?!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s a christian-hating, taqiyya spouting, gay muslin fundamentalist who wishes to institute sharia law (by means of stealth jihad of course) with the eventual goal of destroying America with &#8230; I dunno, gay marriage or something.<br />
Not difficult to understand is it?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message/comment-page-1/#comment-5403776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 02:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223805#comment-5403776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apart from your problems with Mr. Obama, let me help you with a language issue with which you are struggling.  Take note of the third usage Ms. Sloganeering describes. http://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2014/03/must-should-ought/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apart from your problems with Mr. Obama, let me help you with a language issue with which you are struggling.  Take note of the third usage Ms. Sloganeering describes. <a href="http://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2014/03/must-should-ought/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2014/03/must-should-ought/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message/comment-page-1/#comment-5403738</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223805#comment-5403738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, crickets on the whole workplace violence thing?  Just another bout of over active imaginations?  Cool.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, crickets on the whole workplace violence thing?  Just another bout of over active imaginations?  Cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message/comment-page-1/#comment-5403650</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223805#comment-5403650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;That is the end of the matter.&quot;


Wait - isn&#039;t that the end of the end of the end of the matter by now?


It&#039;s really quite simple, friend charlaton - you&#039;ve worked yourself into a lather over a one-sentence excerpt from a speech, convinced yourself that it means a certain thing, and  you now lack the integrity or wit to understand that the issue you raised was also raised - and dispensed with - in the very speech you&#039;re ranting about.


You asked about the OIC.  The U.S. is not a member, and as we&#039;ve both now seen, Mr. Obama explicitly rejects in his speech that &quot;draconian dream&quot; you were on about, so while the existence of the OIC may make you indignant - as, indeed, what does not? - Mr. Obama was quite clearly and &lt;i&gt;explicitly&lt;/i&gt; rejecting, not advancing, any restriction of legal limits on speech.


Unless you have a reading disorder, there&#039;s not much left to say.  You expressed concern that Mr. Obama&#039;s speech meant that he was calling for reliious-based restrictions on free speech.  Reading the transcript of his speech, we find that he addresses that very point and makes it the keystone of his address: that demcratic nations do NOT suppress speech in that manner.


So, yes, yes,yes - that &lt;i&gt;is &lt;i&gt; the end of the matter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That is the end of the matter.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wait &#8211; isn&#8217;t that the end of the end of the end of the matter by now?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really quite simple, friend charlaton &#8211; you&#8217;ve worked yourself into a lather over a one-sentence excerpt from a speech, convinced yourself that it means a certain thing, and  you now lack the integrity or wit to understand that the issue you raised was also raised &#8211; and dispensed with &#8211; in the very speech you&#8217;re ranting about.</p>
<p>You asked about the OIC.  The U.S. is not a member, and as we&#8217;ve both now seen, Mr. Obama explicitly rejects in his speech that &#8220;draconian dream&#8221; you were on about, so while the existence of the OIC may make you indignant &#8211; as, indeed, what does not? &#8211; Mr. Obama was quite clearly and <i>explicitly</i> rejecting, not advancing, any restriction of legal limits on speech.</p>
<p>Unless you have a reading disorder, there&#8217;s not much left to say.  You expressed concern that Mr. Obama&#8217;s speech meant that he was calling for reliious-based restrictions on free speech.  Reading the transcript of his speech, we find that he addresses that very point and makes it the keystone of his address: that demcratic nations do NOT suppress speech in that manner.</p>
<p>So, yes, yes,yes &#8211; that <i>is </i><i> the end of the matter.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: logdon</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message/comment-page-1/#comment-5403646</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[logdon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223805#comment-5403646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your tediously rambling and predictable reply is now getting extremely  boring and quite frankly if you can&#039;t address the points I  can&#039;t even be bothered reading it.

Have you even heard of the OIC or read of it&#039;s machinations which, by the way Hillary also endorses?

There is a bigger picture which obviously eludes you.

As I said before you crassly attempted to commandeer my final rejoinder......

That is the end of the matter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your tediously rambling and predictable reply is now getting extremely  boring and quite frankly if you can&#8217;t address the points I  can&#8217;t even be bothered reading it.</p>
<p>Have you even heard of the OIC or read of it&#8217;s machinations which, by the way Hillary also endorses?</p>
<p>There is a bigger picture which obviously eludes you.</p>
<p>As I said before you crassly attempted to commandeer my final rejoinder&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>That is the end of the matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message/comment-page-1/#comment-5403638</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223805#comment-5403638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And your argument isn&#039;t; rather, it&#039;s a display of indignant certitude.  

You resent being told what you can say?  The most obvious response is that you need to direct your resentment toward its source - your overactive imagination and sense of paranoia.  &quot;The future must not belong...&quot; is an edict &lt;i&gt;to whom?&lt;/i&gt;  The future?  Let the future pen - erm, type - its indignant missive about what it&#039;s being allowed to do. 

Note, too, that Mr. Obama did not say that he intends to exterminate or eliminate those who &quot;slander the Prophet;&quot; he simply said that they shall not own the future.  

But wait - you don&#039;t want to quibble about the semantics, you want to turn to what he clearly said.  Very well, logdon, let&#039;s turn to what he very clearly said.  Let&#039;s turn to the speech you&#039;re quoting.  Here&#039;s an excerpt:

&lt;blockquote&gt;And yet the turmoil of recent weeks reminds us that the path to 
democracy does not end with the casting of a ballot.  Nelson Mandela 
once said:  &quot;To be free is not merely to cast off one’s chains, but to 
live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others.&quot;  
(Applause.) 

True democracy demands that citizens cannot be thrown in jail because
 of what they believe, and that businesses can be opened without paying a
 bribe.  It depends on the freedom of citizens to speak their minds and 
assemble without fear, and on the rule of law and due process that 
guarantees the rights of all people.
In other words, true democracy -- real freedom -- is hard work.  
Those in power have to resist the temptation to crack down on 
dissidents.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So here you are, trying to argue that there&#039;s a meaning of the word &quot;must&quot; that permits you to work yourself into a lather because you&#039;re afraid that it means the president is calling for the end of your right as an Englishman to speak your mind, such as it is - and yet, here is the point you&#039;ve raised, quite clearly and explicitly addressed &lt;i&gt; in the same speech.&lt;/i&gt; 

But wait, you cry!  That was just a sop to democracy - surely he&#039;s planning on working an exception in to build that ring around Islam that logdon is going on about?  Well, all we have to do is &lt;i&gt;keep reading.&lt;/i&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;We are home to Muslims who worship across our country.  We not only 
respect the freedom of religion, we have laws that protect individuals 
from being harmed because of how they look or what they believe.  We 
understand why people take offense to this video because millions of our
 citizens are among them.

I know there are some who ask why we don’t just ban such a video.  
And the answer is enshrined in our laws:  Our Constitution protects the 
right to practice free speech. 

Here in the United States, countless publications provoke offense.  
Like me, the majority of Americans are Christian, and yet we do not ban 
blasphemy against our most sacred beliefs.  As President of our country 
and Commander-in-Chief of our military, I accept that people are going 
to call me awful things every day -- (laughter) -- and I will always 
defend their right to do so.  (Applause.) 

Americans have fought and died around the globe to protect the right 
of all people to express their views, even views that we profoundly 
disagree with.  We do not do so because we support hateful speech, but 
because our founders understood that without such protections, the 
capacity of each individual to express their own views and practice 
their own faith may be threatened.  We do so because in a diverse 
society, efforts to restrict speech can quickly become a tool to silence
 critics and oppress minorities. 

We do so because given the power of faith in our lives, and the 
passion that religious differences can inflame, the strongest weapon 
against hateful speech is not repression; it is more speech -- the 
voices of tolerance that rally against bigotry and blasphemy, and lift 
up the values of understanding and mutual respect.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

 

Oh, my!  That froth of paranoia and indignation you worked yourself into because you&#039;re convinced his speech calls for the elimination of your right to criticize Islam - turns out he &lt;i&gt;specifically addressed&lt;/i&gt; your concern in a manner that couldn&#039;t have been more to your satisfaction.  He rejects what you reject, if only much more articulately.

So what was he saying in the bit you appear to have confined your reading to - that one sentence?  He speaks at some length about the responsibility of the citizens of free countries to use their power of free speech to marginalize extremist thought.  He spends quite a bit of time decrying those who define themselves by hatred of the West.  Then he comes to this part:

&lt;blockquote&gt;The future must not belong to those who target Coptic Christians in 
Egypt -- it must be claimed by those in Tahrir Square who chanted, 
&quot;Muslims, Christians, we are one.&quot;  The future must not belong to those 
who bully women -- it must be shaped by girls who go to school, and 
those who stand for a world where our daughters can live their dreams 
just like our sons.  (Applause.) 
The future must not belong to those corrupt few who steal a country’s
 resources -- it must be won by the students and entrepreneurs, the 
workers and business owners who seek a broader prosperity for all 
people.  Those are the women and men that America stands with; theirs is
 the vision we will support. 

	 The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.  
But to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the
 hate we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or 
churches that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied.  &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Why, he&#039;s trying to build a fence around Coptic Christianity!  Does that frighten you?  Are you concerned that your precious English sovereignty is about to be subjected to the authority of the Coptic Pope?

&quot;...this Islamo pandering charlaton[sic]...&quot;

 

I think it&#039;s pretty clear who the charlatan is.  Next time you go building your xenophobic fantasies, why not try doing some elementary research before letting those misguided fingers find a keyboard?

&quot;And that is the end of the matter.&quot;
 
Why, yes, it is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And your argument isn&#8217;t; rather, it&#8217;s a display of indignant certitude.  </p>
<p>You resent being told what you can say?  The most obvious response is that you need to direct your resentment toward its source &#8211; your overactive imagination and sense of paranoia.  &#8220;The future must not belong&#8230;&#8221; is an edict <i>to whom?</i>  The future?  Let the future pen &#8211; erm, type &#8211; its indignant missive about what it&#8217;s being allowed to do. </p>
<p>Note, too, that Mr. Obama did not say that he intends to exterminate or eliminate those who &#8220;slander the Prophet;&#8221; he simply said that they shall not own the future.  </p>
<p>But wait &#8211; you don&#8217;t want to quibble about the semantics, you want to turn to what he clearly said.  Very well, logdon, let&#8217;s turn to what he very clearly said.  Let&#8217;s turn to the speech you&#8217;re quoting.  Here&#8217;s an excerpt:</p>
<blockquote><p>And yet the turmoil of recent weeks reminds us that the path to<br />
democracy does not end with the casting of a ballot.  Nelson Mandela<br />
once said:  &#8220;To be free is not merely to cast off one’s chains, but to<br />
live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others.&#8221;<br />
(Applause.) </p>
<p>True democracy demands that citizens cannot be thrown in jail because<br />
 of what they believe, and that businesses can be opened without paying a<br />
 bribe.  It depends on the freedom of citizens to speak their minds and<br />
assemble without fear, and on the rule of law and due process that<br />
guarantees the rights of all people.<br />
In other words, true democracy &#8212; real freedom &#8212; is hard work.<br />
Those in power have to resist the temptation to crack down on<br />
dissidents.</p></blockquote>
<p>So here you are, trying to argue that there&#8217;s a meaning of the word &#8220;must&#8221; that permits you to work yourself into a lather because you&#8217;re afraid that it means the president is calling for the end of your right as an Englishman to speak your mind, such as it is &#8211; and yet, here is the point you&#8217;ve raised, quite clearly and explicitly addressed <i> in the same speech.</i> </p>
<p>But wait, you cry!  That was just a sop to democracy &#8211; surely he&#8217;s planning on working an exception in to build that ring around Islam that logdon is going on about?  Well, all we have to do is <i>keep reading.</i>:</p>
<blockquote><p>We are home to Muslims who worship across our country.  We not only<br />
respect the freedom of religion, we have laws that protect individuals<br />
from being harmed because of how they look or what they believe.  We<br />
understand why people take offense to this video because millions of our<br />
 citizens are among them.</p>
<p>I know there are some who ask why we don’t just ban such a video.<br />
And the answer is enshrined in our laws:  Our Constitution protects the<br />
right to practice free speech. </p>
<p>Here in the United States, countless publications provoke offense.<br />
Like me, the majority of Americans are Christian, and yet we do not ban<br />
blasphemy against our most sacred beliefs.  As President of our country<br />
and Commander-in-Chief of our military, I accept that people are going<br />
to call me awful things every day &#8212; (laughter) &#8212; and I will always<br />
defend their right to do so.  (Applause.) </p>
<p>Americans have fought and died around the globe to protect the right<br />
of all people to express their views, even views that we profoundly<br />
disagree with.  We do not do so because we support hateful speech, but<br />
because our founders understood that without such protections, the<br />
capacity of each individual to express their own views and practice<br />
their own faith may be threatened.  We do so because in a diverse<br />
society, efforts to restrict speech can quickly become a tool to silence<br />
 critics and oppress minorities. </p>
<p>We do so because given the power of faith in our lives, and the<br />
passion that religious differences can inflame, the strongest weapon<br />
against hateful speech is not repression; it is more speech &#8212; the<br />
voices of tolerance that rally against bigotry and blasphemy, and lift<br />
up the values of understanding and mutual respect.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, my!  That froth of paranoia and indignation you worked yourself into because you&#8217;re convinced his speech calls for the elimination of your right to criticize Islam &#8211; turns out he <i>specifically addressed</i> your concern in a manner that couldn&#8217;t have been more to your satisfaction.  He rejects what you reject, if only much more articulately.</p>
<p>So what was he saying in the bit you appear to have confined your reading to &#8211; that one sentence?  He speaks at some length about the responsibility of the citizens of free countries to use their power of free speech to marginalize extremist thought.  He spends quite a bit of time decrying those who define themselves by hatred of the West.  Then he comes to this part:</p>
<blockquote><p>The future must not belong to those who target Coptic Christians in<br />
Egypt &#8212; it must be claimed by those in Tahrir Square who chanted,<br />
&#8220;Muslims, Christians, we are one.&#8221;  The future must not belong to those<br />
who bully women &#8212; it must be shaped by girls who go to school, and<br />
those who stand for a world where our daughters can live their dreams<br />
just like our sons.  (Applause.)<br />
The future must not belong to those corrupt few who steal a country’s<br />
 resources &#8212; it must be won by the students and entrepreneurs, the<br />
workers and business owners who seek a broader prosperity for all<br />
people.  Those are the women and men that America stands with; theirs is<br />
 the vision we will support. </p>
<p>	 The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.<br />
But to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the<br />
 hate we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or<br />
churches that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied.  </p></blockquote>
<p>Why, he&#8217;s trying to build a fence around Coptic Christianity!  Does that frighten you?  Are you concerned that your precious English sovereignty is about to be subjected to the authority of the Coptic Pope?</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;this Islamo pandering charlaton[sic]&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s pretty clear who the charlatan is.  Next time you go building your xenophobic fantasies, why not try doing some elementary research before letting those misguided fingers find a keyboard?</p>
<p>&#8220;And that is the end of the matter.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why, yes, it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: logdon</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message/comment-page-1/#comment-5403609</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[logdon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223805#comment-5403609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your argument is facile semantics and akin to the old &#039;how many angels can fit on a pin head&#039; circumlocution of the Middle Ages.

Frankly it doesn&#039;t wash.

Must is not a &#039;hope&#039; it is an edict and if you can&#039;t see that our argument is over.

Your meandering over the subject of the verb is quite ridiculous.

However I&#039;ll get back to the main point which you obviously wish to avoid in your convolutions.

He is merely using a discredited film  makers depiction of Mohammed which as it turned out was nothing to do with the Benghazi debacle to foist the OIC&#039;s draconian dream of the banning of free speech globally via an Islamic blasphemy law.

That is of utmost seriousness and it is not me who is being hysterical, rather you in your blind worship for this excuse of a president who is desperately defending the indefensible.

&#039;The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam&#039; is as clear as it gets.

He is ring fencing one faith over another. 

By attempting it via the UN, he is presuming that his reach of jurisdiction is of a world-wide order. .

He is telling me and the rest of humanity what we can and cannot say about Islam.

He has never defended Christianity is such an obvious and aggressively dominant manner. That speaks volumes.

 In fact although the Pilgrim Fathers were Christian and America was created on Judeo-Christian principles he denies this by ridiculously asserting that the USA is a Muslim country.

No one but the eternally gullible is buying it.

That, by your facile and wafer thin argument obviously includes you.

If you wish to worship and adore the Prophet of Islam that&#039;s your affair and good luck with that. I do not.

Got that?

 I, as an Englishman resent being told what I can and cannot say by an American president, never mind one with such thin and quite frankly questionable credentials.

Despite his quite outrageously grandiose efforts, he holds not one iota of sovereignty over me and his realm of jurisdiction ends at your side of the Atlantic.

I will certainly not be dictated to by this Islamo pandering charlaton.

And that is the end of the matter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is facile semantics and akin to the old &#8216;how many angels can fit on a pin head&#8217; circumlocution of the Middle Ages.</p>
<p>Frankly it doesn&#8217;t wash.</p>
<p>Must is not a &#8216;hope&#8217; it is an edict and if you can&#8217;t see that our argument is over.</p>
<p>Your meandering over the subject of the verb is quite ridiculous.</p>
<p>However I&#8217;ll get back to the main point which you obviously wish to avoid in your convolutions.</p>
<p>He is merely using a discredited film  makers depiction of Mohammed which as it turned out was nothing to do with the Benghazi debacle to foist the OIC&#8217;s draconian dream of the banning of free speech globally via an Islamic blasphemy law.</p>
<p>That is of utmost seriousness and it is not me who is being hysterical, rather you in your blind worship for this excuse of a president who is desperately defending the indefensible.</p>
<p>&#8216;The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam&#8217; is as clear as it gets.</p>
<p>He is ring fencing one faith over another. </p>
<p>By attempting it via the UN, he is presuming that his reach of jurisdiction is of a world-wide order. .</p>
<p>He is telling me and the rest of humanity what we can and cannot say about Islam.</p>
<p>He has never defended Christianity is such an obvious and aggressively dominant manner. That speaks volumes.</p>
<p> In fact although the Pilgrim Fathers were Christian and America was created on Judeo-Christian principles he denies this by ridiculously asserting that the USA is a Muslim country.</p>
<p>No one but the eternally gullible is buying it.</p>
<p>That, by your facile and wafer thin argument obviously includes you.</p>
<p>If you wish to worship and adore the Prophet of Islam that&#8217;s your affair and good luck with that. I do not.</p>
<p>Got that?</p>
<p> I, as an Englishman resent being told what I can and cannot say by an American president, never mind one with such thin and quite frankly questionable credentials.</p>
<p>Despite his quite outrageously grandiose efforts, he holds not one iota of sovereignty over me and his realm of jurisdiction ends at your side of the Atlantic.</p>
<p>I will certainly not be dictated to by this Islamo pandering charlaton.</p>
<p>And that is the end of the matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message/comment-page-1/#comment-5403477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223805#comment-5403477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wait, wait - is Obama a Muslim, or is his mentor Rev Wright?  You guys need to get your stories straight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, wait &#8211; is Obama a Muslim, or is his mentor Rev Wright?  You guys need to get your stories straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message/comment-page-1/#comment-5403474</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223805#comment-5403474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suppose I do need help - accessing the psychic hotline from which you have divined that Obama&#039;s disapproval of religious hatred would find satisfaction through extra constitutional means.  There are a couple of flaws in your overheated construction.  First, you have asserted that &quot;must&quot; has a single clear meaning that admits of no other interpretation but yours.  That is wrong on two counts.  First, &quot;must&quot; is more commonly understood to be a synonym for &quot;should,&quot; which is consistent with the president&#039;s actual meaning.  Don&#039;t take my word for it, look it up.  In fact, the first dictionary you find will also define &quot;must&quot; as expressing an opinion about something that is very likely, which also calls into question your unjustifiably restrictive interpretation.  Second, in order to hold the meaning you propose, the &quot;must&quot; should be directed at an actor whose choices are being thereby limited.  &quot;A citizen must identify himself at the request of a police officer.&quot;  Which actor is being constrained in Obama&#039;s construction?  &quot;The future?&quot;  

Get real.  The future must not belong to...&quot; Is a clear statement about Obama&#039;s hopes for what the future will look like.  There is exactly nothing in that construction that implies a readiness to employ illegal means to bring it about, or even to imply an attack on anyone&#039;s free speech.

You must see that.  

Oh my - did my last line imply that you have no 1st Amendment right to disagree?  Did it imply that I intended to use force or violence to ensure that you &quot;see that?&quot;  Starting to understand why your take is, indeed, hysterical?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose I do need help &#8211; accessing the psychic hotline from which you have divined that Obama&#8217;s disapproval of religious hatred would find satisfaction through extra constitutional means.  There are a couple of flaws in your overheated construction.  First, you have asserted that &#8220;must&#8221; has a single clear meaning that admits of no other interpretation but yours.  That is wrong on two counts.  First, &#8220;must&#8221; is more commonly understood to be a synonym for &#8220;should,&#8221; which is consistent with the president&#8217;s actual meaning.  Don&#8217;t take my word for it, look it up.  In fact, the first dictionary you find will also define &#8220;must&#8221; as expressing an opinion about something that is very likely, which also calls into question your unjustifiably restrictive interpretation.  Second, in order to hold the meaning you propose, the &#8220;must&#8221; should be directed at an actor whose choices are being thereby limited.  &#8220;A citizen must identify himself at the request of a police officer.&#8221;  Which actor is being constrained in Obama&#8217;s construction?  &#8220;The future?&#8221;  </p>
<p>Get real.  The future must not belong to&#8230;&#8221; Is a clear statement about Obama&#8217;s hopes for what the future will look like.  There is exactly nothing in that construction that implies a readiness to employ illegal means to bring it about, or even to imply an attack on anyone&#8217;s free speech.</p>
<p>You must see that.  </p>
<p>Oh my &#8211; did my last line imply that you have no 1st Amendment right to disagree?  Did it imply that I intended to use force or violence to ensure that you &#8220;see that?&#8221;  Starting to understand why your take is, indeed, hysterical?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: logdon</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message/comment-page-1/#comment-5403260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[logdon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223805#comment-5403260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The future MUST not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam is as clear as it gets.

Precisely what he said. Must not. Not may not or can we talk about this. Pure edict.

That&#039;s not hysteria, it is Obama&#039;s endorsement of the sharia blasphemy law and if you can&#039;t see that you need help.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The future MUST not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam is as clear as it gets.</p>
<p>Precisely what he said. Must not. Not may not or can we talk about this. Pure edict.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not hysteria, it is Obama&#8217;s endorsement of the sharia blasphemy law and if you can&#8217;t see that you need help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libslayer</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message/comment-page-1/#comment-5403104</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Libslayer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 02:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223805#comment-5403104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liberals are really boring. I nodded off during your screed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberals are really boring. I nodded off during your screed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message/comment-page-1/#comment-5403082</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 01:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223805#comment-5403082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Let me be more direct.&quot;

It&#039;s a shame that &quot;direct&quot; is not synonymous with &quot;rational.&quot;
 
&quot;Your judgement of Obama is clouded by your ideology.&quot;
 
I haven&#039;t offered you my judgment of Obama.  You&#039;re jumping to conclusions and engaging in sloppy thinking. 
 
&quot;...he&#039;s easily the worst president...&quot;

Your overall opinion of Obama is neither topical nor of much interest.  You don&#039;t know my overall opinion of Obama, either, so let me spare you the long tirade in which you energetically demolish a straw man.  
 
&quot;...and Obama &quot;okayed&quot; it after the fact.&quot;
 
Actually, he gave the final approval on 29 April, and contacted ADM McRaven the next day to wish his men luck.  If you&#039;re having trouble figuring out why 29 April is not after 2 May, just ask.  

&quot;I will rejoice the day he and the wookie move out...&quot;

Again, what you do or don&#039;t rejoice at is a matter of interest to your friends and family.  The &quot;wookie&quot; comment displays a certain lack of class, but no shocker there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Let me be more direct.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame that &#8220;direct&#8221; is not synonymous with &#8220;rational.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Your judgement of Obama is clouded by your ideology.&#8221;</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t offered you my judgment of Obama.  You&#8217;re jumping to conclusions and engaging in sloppy thinking. </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;he&#8217;s easily the worst president&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Your overall opinion of Obama is neither topical nor of much interest.  You don&#8217;t know my overall opinion of Obama, either, so let me spare you the long tirade in which you energetically demolish a straw man.  </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;and Obama &#8220;okayed&#8221; it after the fact.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, he gave the final approval on 29 April, and contacted ADM McRaven the next day to wish his men luck.  If you&#8217;re having trouble figuring out why 29 April is not after 2 May, just ask.  </p>
<p>&#8220;I will rejoice the day he and the wookie move out&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Again, what you do or don&#8217;t rejoice at is a matter of interest to your friends and family.  The &#8220;wookie&#8221; comment displays a certain lack of class, but no shocker there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libslayer</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message/comment-page-1/#comment-5403007</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Libslayer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223805#comment-5403007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me be more direct.
Your judgement of Obama is clouded by your ideology.
Obama is a disaster in every possible way; he&#039;s easily the worst president since Woodrow Wilson. Yet his adorers see no flaws in the man at all. Obama took out bin laden- single handedly no doubt. Since then, jihadis have an ally in Obama, as Christians and Jews are exterminated in Muslim countries across the Middle East. The Muslim brotherhood has direct connections with many in obama&#039;s cabinet, and Iran will get a nuke and use it, and Obama will go golfing.
Obama and his Muslim chief of staff Valerie Jarrett were dragged kicking and screaming into the bin laden raid, and Obama &quot;okayed&quot; it after the fact.
Obama is an Islamic sympathizer and antisemite, in addition to being a Marxist nitwit. Defend the boob if you must. I will rejoice the day he and the wookie move out and the White House can be deloused and fumigated, the way it had to be when the Clintons moved out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me be more direct.<br />
Your judgement of Obama is clouded by your ideology.<br />
Obama is a disaster in every possible way; he&#8217;s easily the worst president since Woodrow Wilson. Yet his adorers see no flaws in the man at all. Obama took out bin laden- single handedly no doubt. Since then, jihadis have an ally in Obama, as Christians and Jews are exterminated in Muslim countries across the Middle East. The Muslim brotherhood has direct connections with many in obama&#8217;s cabinet, and Iran will get a nuke and use it, and Obama will go golfing.<br />
Obama and his Muslim chief of staff Valerie Jarrett were dragged kicking and screaming into the bin laden raid, and Obama &#8220;okayed&#8221; it after the fact.<br />
Obama is an Islamic sympathizer and antisemite, in addition to being a Marxist nitwit. Defend the boob if you must. I will rejoice the day he and the wookie move out and the White House can be deloused and fumigated, the way it had to be when the Clintons moved out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message/comment-page-1/#comment-5402990</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223805#comment-5402990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nobody told you what you can or cannot say.  That&#039;s a product of your own hysteria.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody told you what you can or cannot say.  That&#8217;s a product of your own hysteria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heideleena</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message/comment-page-1/#comment-5402912</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[heideleena]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 20:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223805#comment-5402912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If that&#039;s the case, why haven&#039;t there been Muslim leaders speaking out against the Muslims that practice exactly what the Koran teaches?  Has CAIR made it their mission to condemn Muslim terrorists? The silence is deafening.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that&#8217;s the case, why haven&#8217;t there been Muslim leaders speaking out against the Muslims that practice exactly what the Koran teaches?  Has CAIR made it their mission to condemn Muslim terrorists? The silence is deafening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heideleena</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message/comment-page-1/#comment-5402911</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[heideleena]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223805#comment-5402911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read it that way too at first.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read it that way too at first.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: logdon</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-praises-muslims-in-easter-message/comment-page-1/#comment-5402910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[logdon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=223805#comment-5402910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear me!


For a start it was a lie and he knew it. Religious hatred was his false flag.



Secondly blatantly rejecting the First Amendment  by legislation was a step to far, even for this megalomanic.


 So next best,  he seeds the impulse to blasphemy law which is core sharia by making his outrageous statement in the place dominated by OIC mentality knowing full well that he&#039;d get away with it.


His statement didn&#039;t only apply to America but was a globally encompassing edict.


In other words this charlaton has the nerve to tell me in Britain, or a Frenchman or a German or an Italian what we can and cannot say.


His hubris is quite off the scale and reflects perfectly the totalitarians he so admires.



Sorry but I&#039;m not buying it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear me!</p>
<p>For a start it was a lie and he knew it. Religious hatred was his false flag.</p>
<p>Secondly blatantly rejecting the First Amendment  by legislation was a step to far, even for this megalomanic.</p>
<p> So next best,  he seeds the impulse to blasphemy law which is core sharia by making his outrageous statement in the place dominated by OIC mentality knowing full well that he&#8217;d get away with it.</p>
<p>His statement didn&#8217;t only apply to America but was a globally encompassing edict.</p>
<p>In other words this charlaton has the nerve to tell me in Britain, or a Frenchman or a German or an Italian what we can and cannot say.</p>
<p>His hubris is quite off the scale and reflects perfectly the totalitarians he so admires.</p>
<p>Sorry but I&#8217;m not buying it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 776/856 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-31 00:49:03 by W3 Total Cache -->