<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ObamaCare May Put 40% of Home Health Care Providers Out of Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 15:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Reeder</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-5401012</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Reeder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=219865#comment-5401012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent.   Then you understand that if you kill someone for the 
purpose of preventing them from reproducing, such killing could 
reasonably described as &#039;eugenics.&#039;  Killing those who could not 
reproduce anyway could not.

http://www.newgenerationshc.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent.   Then you understand that if you kill someone for the<br />
purpose of preventing them from reproducing, such killing could<br />
reasonably described as &#8216;eugenics.&#8217;  Killing those who could not<br />
reproduce anyway could not.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newgenerationshc.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.newgenerationshc.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-5379195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 04:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=219865#comment-5379195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;If that doctor&#039;s training involves the priorities of eugenics&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But that&#039;s just the point: the doctor doesn&#039;t have to be trained &quot;in the priorities of eugenics&quot; for his training to fall under your definition of eugenics.  All that&#039;s required is that his training could conceivably be of some use, however slight, remote, or indirect, in the support of the suitable.  Any doctor trained in medicine of any sort could, at some point, be directed to tend to the suitable.  
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If that doctor&#8217;s training involves the priorities of eugenics</p></blockquote>
<p>But that&#8217;s just the point: the doctor doesn&#8217;t have to be trained &#8220;in the priorities of eugenics&#8221; for his training to fall under your definition of eugenics.  All that&#8217;s required is that his training could conceivably be of some use, however slight, remote, or indirect, in the support of the suitable.  Any doctor trained in medicine of any sort could, at some point, be directed to tend to the suitable.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-5379190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 04:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=219865#comment-5379190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I address that elsewhere, but I&#039;ll summarize here:

Killing the elderly does not free up resources for the suitable; it simply frees up resources.  Those resources must then be identified, marshaled, and employed in a way that helps the suitable without helping the unsuitable.

In that respect, killing the elderly is no different from any other human productive or conservational activity.  Training doctors, digging coal, making pencils, repairing tires, purifying water - you name it - the results of such activity can then be collected and turned to the support of the suitable.  Glass-making becomes &quot;eugenics&quot; - the glass might be used to produce spectacles employed by a clerk to enable him to make note of the address of one of the suitable to which a bottle of aspirin was to be shipped.  The lumberjack who felled the tree that provided the wood used to make the clerk&#039;s pencil was engaging in &quot;eugenics.&quot;  The printshop that produced the timetables for the streetcars on which the clerk rode to work was engaging in &quot;eugenics.&quot;  


You&#039;d have made &quot;eugenics&quot; synonymous with &quot;all human activity,&quot; and deprived the word of any meaning at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I address that elsewhere, but I&#8217;ll summarize here:</p>
<p>Killing the elderly does not free up resources for the suitable; it simply frees up resources.  Those resources must then be identified, marshaled, and employed in a way that helps the suitable without helping the unsuitable.</p>
<p>In that respect, killing the elderly is no different from any other human productive or conservational activity.  Training doctors, digging coal, making pencils, repairing tires, purifying water &#8211; you name it &#8211; the results of such activity can then be collected and turned to the support of the suitable.  Glass-making becomes &#8220;eugenics&#8221; &#8211; the glass might be used to produce spectacles employed by a clerk to enable him to make note of the address of one of the suitable to which a bottle of aspirin was to be shipped.  The lumberjack who felled the tree that provided the wood used to make the clerk&#8217;s pencil was engaging in &#8220;eugenics.&#8221;  The printshop that produced the timetables for the streetcars on which the clerk rode to work was engaging in &#8220;eugenics.&#8221;  </p>
<p>You&#8217;d have made &#8220;eugenics&#8221; synonymous with &#8220;all human activity,&#8221; and deprived the word of any meaning at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-5379185</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Greenfield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 04:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=219865#comment-5379185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Training a doctor becomes an exercise in eugenics, since that doctor could conceivably be employed in tending to the suitable.&quot;

If that doctor&#039;s training involves the priorities of eugenics 

We&#039;ve been over this with the Communist schoolhouse]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Training a doctor becomes an exercise in eugenics, since that doctor could conceivably be employed in tending to the suitable.&#8221;</p>
<p>If that doctor&#8217;s training involves the priorities of eugenics </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been over this with the Communist schoolhouse</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-5379181</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=219865#comment-5379181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Galton&#039;s clearly stated objective was the disproportionate contribution of the suitable to the next generation.  To argue that a social activity fits under that umbrella, you&#039;d have to show a clear and direct contribution to that goal.  The chain of reasoning that you offered - that killing the elderly frees up resources that can then be applied to supporting the suitable - is so tenuous and vague that, were it to be accepted, could be applied to essentially any human activity.  Simply asserting that Galton&#039;s vision included social elements does not address that weakness.

To help you understand just how tenuous the chain of logic really is, consider that killing the elderly does not, in fact, free up resources for the suitable.  It simply frees up resources.  Those resources must then be identified, brought under control, and directed toward the support of the suitable, as opposed to the unsuitable.  The act of freeing up those resources, then, is no different from the act of creating or conserving any type of resource.  Training a doctor becomes an exercise in eugenics, since that doctor could conceivably be employed in tending to the suitable.  Digging a coal mine would be eugenics, as the coal could be used to power a turbine that generates electricity that lights a lamp used by a nurse to read the notes of a doctor tending to the suitable.  

And, though not directly related to the above, Galton&#039;s disparaging comments concerning natural selection indicates that he contrasted the bloody and imprecise methods of nature with the civilized and selective methods of eugenics.  Slaughtering the old in order to free up resources is hardly consistent with that characterization.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Galton&#8217;s clearly stated objective was the disproportionate contribution of the suitable to the next generation.  To argue that a social activity fits under that umbrella, you&#8217;d have to show a clear and direct contribution to that goal.  The chain of reasoning that you offered &#8211; that killing the elderly frees up resources that can then be applied to supporting the suitable &#8211; is so tenuous and vague that, were it to be accepted, could be applied to essentially any human activity.  Simply asserting that Galton&#8217;s vision included social elements does not address that weakness.</p>
<p>To help you understand just how tenuous the chain of logic really is, consider that killing the elderly does not, in fact, free up resources for the suitable.  It simply frees up resources.  Those resources must then be identified, brought under control, and directed toward the support of the suitable, as opposed to the unsuitable.  The act of freeing up those resources, then, is no different from the act of creating or conserving any type of resource.  Training a doctor becomes an exercise in eugenics, since that doctor could conceivably be employed in tending to the suitable.  Digging a coal mine would be eugenics, as the coal could be used to power a turbine that generates electricity that lights a lamp used by a nurse to read the notes of a doctor tending to the suitable.  </p>
<p>And, though not directly related to the above, Galton&#8217;s disparaging comments concerning natural selection indicates that he contrasted the bloody and imprecise methods of nature with the civilized and selective methods of eugenics.  Slaughtering the old in order to free up resources is hardly consistent with that characterization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-5379182</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Greenfield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=219865#comment-5379182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...unless you are killing them to free up medical resources for those who can]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;unless you are killing them to free up medical resources for those who can</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-5379170</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 03:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=219865#comment-5379170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;While building schools does not make one a Communist, building schools for the purposes of Communist indoctrination does.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Excellent.   Then you understand that if you kill someone for the purpose of preventing them from reproducing, such killing could reasonably described as &#039;eugenics.&#039;  Killing those who could not reproduce anyway could not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>While building schools does not make one a Communist, building schools for the purposes of Communist indoctrination does.</p></blockquote>
<p>Excellent.   Then you understand that if you kill someone for the purpose of preventing them from reproducing, such killing could reasonably described as &#8216;eugenics.&#8217;  Killing those who could not reproduce anyway could not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-5379172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 03:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=219865#comment-5379172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Why are we talking about eugenic&quot;


Overenthusiasm and poor aim.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why are we talking about eugenic&#8221;</p>
<p>Overenthusiasm and poor aim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-5379105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Greenfield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 01:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=219865#comment-5379105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[School-building most certainly was a Communist activity since it was one of the means of indoctrination.

While building schools does not make one a Communist, building schools for the purposes of Communist indoctrination does.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>School-building most certainly was a Communist activity since it was one of the means of indoctrination.</p>
<p>While building schools does not make one a Communist, building schools for the purposes of Communist indoctrination does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-5379104</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Greenfield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 01:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=219865#comment-5379104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Galton&#039;s parameters encompassed the social as well as the genetic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Galton&#8217;s parameters encompassed the social as well as the genetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Z</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-5378953</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Z]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=219865#comment-5378953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I said is that they should pay for their own nursing home care.  If they do so I don;t care how much money They give to their kids. IMO they should be able to give 100% of their money to their kids without any tax.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I said is that they should pay for their own nursing home care.  If they do so I don;t care how much money They give to their kids. IMO they should be able to give 100% of their money to their kids without any tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1stworlder</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-5378923</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1stworlder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=219865#comment-5378923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He is a man, if you consider someone who lays on his belly in bath houses a man.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is a man, if you consider someone who lays on his belly in bath houses a man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1stworlder</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-5378921</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1stworlder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=219865#comment-5378921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The redistribution of wealth from old Asians and whites to Latrina&#039;s 20 illegitimate crack babies is a form of eugenics, as Latrina couldn&#039;t have 20 of them without redistribution.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The redistribution of wealth from old Asians and whites to Latrina&#8217;s 20 illegitimate crack babies is a form of eugenics, as Latrina couldn&#8217;t have 20 of them without redistribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1stworlder</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-5378918</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1stworlder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=219865#comment-5378918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are we talking about eugenics when the left is all about dysgenics? Importing low IQ 3rdworlders whose offspring will always vote for more free stuff, and never produce more than they take is the plan for the left. At least Israel has sense enough to deport them, and give them depo-provera shots.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are we talking about eugenics when the left is all about dysgenics? Importing low IQ 3rdworlders whose offspring will always vote for more free stuff, and never produce more than they take is the plan for the left. At least Israel has sense enough to deport them, and give them depo-provera shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1stworlder</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-5378914</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1stworlder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=219865#comment-5378914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As long as you understand importing the 3rdworld with people that evolved in R type settings is dysgenics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as you understand importing the 3rdworld with people that evolved in R type settings is dysgenics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1stworlder</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-5378913</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1stworlder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 19:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=219865#comment-5378913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Asians and whites were better off with catastrophic coverage until they hit 50 or had kids unless they had a family history of disease. Obamacare takes money from Asians and whites when they start needing what they put into the system and gives it to those who evolved in R type environments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asians and whites were better off with catastrophic coverage until they hit 50 or had kids unless they had a family history of disease. Obamacare takes money from Asians and whites when they start needing what they put into the system and gives it to those who evolved in R type environments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1stworlder</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-5378912</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1stworlder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=219865#comment-5378912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You would begrudge productive peoples children more of their families earnings than Latrina&#039;s 20 illegitimate crack babies receives of it? Any money passed on to family has been taxed multiple times, including being devalued by inflation. The dollar lost 25% of its value in Obama&#039;s first term so $100 only buys what $75 bought when he got in unless you consider gas at $1.88/gallon. Asians and whites are willing to work so their children can be better off, do you want a world where Asians and whites stop producing, if so go to Haiti.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would begrudge productive peoples children more of their families earnings than Latrina&#8217;s 20 illegitimate crack babies receives of it? Any money passed on to family has been taxed multiple times, including being devalued by inflation. The dollar lost 25% of its value in Obama&#8217;s first term so $100 only buys what $75 bought when he got in unless you consider gas at $1.88/gallon. Asians and whites are willing to work so their children can be better off, do you want a world where Asians and whites stop producing, if so go to Haiti.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-5377639</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2014 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=219865#comment-5377639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;ll take that as a concession.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
 
I can&#039;t prevent you from taking anything you read in any manner you choose, but I&#039;ll generally make such a comment when it appears that someone with whom I am speaking is offering no new arguments, but is simply repeating prior points.  Since I don&#039;t subscribe to &quot;last post wins,&quot; I don&#039;t feel the need to attempt to post you into subjection, nor do I feel obligated to keep responding until you choose not to post.

As I&#039;ve often noted, those who feel the need to declare victory in this sort of discussion often suspect the quality of their own arguments.  I prefer to let my arguments stand on their own merits.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;That is a very simple question which you are attempting to unnecessarily
 complicate while introducing all sorts of irrelevancies and insults.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t recall insulting you; what did I say that you took as such?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I&#8217;ll take that as a concession.</p></blockquote>
<p>I can&#8217;t prevent you from taking anything you read in any manner you choose, but I&#8217;ll generally make such a comment when it appears that someone with whom I am speaking is offering no new arguments, but is simply repeating prior points.  Since I don&#8217;t subscribe to &#8220;last post wins,&#8221; I don&#8217;t feel the need to attempt to post you into subjection, nor do I feel obligated to keep responding until you choose not to post.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve often noted, those who feel the need to declare victory in this sort of discussion often suspect the quality of their own arguments.  I prefer to let my arguments stand on their own merits.  </p>
<blockquote><p>That is a very simple question which you are attempting to unnecessarily<br />
 complicate while introducing all sorts of irrelevancies and insults.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t recall insulting you; what did I say that you took as such?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-5377637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2014 04:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=219865#comment-5377637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To this point, you&#039;ve offered no adequate response to the objection that the logic by which you attempt to include &#039;death panels&#039; under the umbrella of &quot;eugenics&quot; requires that the latter be redefined beyond Galton&#039;s parameters into essential meaninglessness.  

My case seems in reasonably good shape.  As for &#039;proving&#039; it, I suppose that depends on whether you have anything else to offer by way of argument.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To this point, you&#8217;ve offered no adequate response to the objection that the logic by which you attempt to include &#8216;death panels&#8217; under the umbrella of &#8220;eugenics&#8221; requires that the latter be redefined beyond Galton&#8217;s parameters into essential meaninglessness.  </p>
<p>My case seems in reasonably good shape.  As for &#8216;proving&#8217; it, I suppose that depends on whether you have anything else to offer by way of argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamacare-may-put-40-of-home-health-care-providers-out-of-business/comment-page-1/#comment-5377634</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2014 04:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=219865#comment-5377634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe so.  Though it seems an odd question.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe so.  Though it seems an odd question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 839/942 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 10:18:55 by W3 Total Cache -->