Panetta: “Nobody is to Blame for Benghazi.”

CLINTON-PANETTA-AP PHOTO

That’s good news.

I was worried somebody might to be blame for the murder of four Americans, including the US ambassador to Libya, in a poorly secured compound that was supposed to be protected by a terrorist militia that wasn’t actually being paid in the middle of a city run by terrorists… after support forces were repeatedly told not to come to the aid of the Americans under attack.

Also nobody is to blame for claiming that the whole thing was caused by a YouTube video.

But it’s all nobody’s fault. That’s such a relief. We should just MoveOn and elect Hillary to do for American national security what she did for it in Benghazi. Just ask the CIA Director/Secretary of Defense/Hillary 2016 man who was in a position to know.

Appearing on the Diane Rehm show, Panetta declared “nobody is to blame for Benghazi.”

No, I certainly have not seen any evidence, in my experience did not experience anybody who lied about what took place. One of the things that happened, that created the controversy were the talking points that CIA had developed that indicated that it was a demonstration that got out of hand. I’m not quite sure why they came to that conclusion. It certainly wasn’t my sense at the time. But they looked at the intelligence and that’s where they came [out]. I think those talking points were wrong.  I think they probably should have — the talking points should have said we are investigating this matter and we have not determined exactly what happened.  That should have been the talking points.

Panetta is still lying. The CIA talking points were originally correct. The CIA’s intel was correct. It was the White House and State that massaged the talking points into a lie.

But it’s not his fault that he’s lying. He just wants Hillary to give him a job.

  • Libslayer

    Kudos to Panetta for spilling the beans on Obama.
    But with his disembodied “mistakes were made” blather, in an attempt to protect the political fortunes of a ruthless unprincipled shrew named Clinton, Panetta is revealed as just another dissembling opportunist, a political whore, and of course, a shameless liar.

    • Walter Mow

      Here I was all primed to eviscerate Panetta… now all I have left is a deflated ego like a rejected suitor… darn… lol

      • Libslayer

        Eviscerate away! With liberal democrats we can’t d@mn their anti American antics enough!

        • Walter Mow

          You covered it all, eloquently I might add, so DITTO!!! to your statement!!!

  • barney59

    Hillary is busy re-writing the history of her past with enablers like Panetta.

    • contemptuous Maximus

      Rewriting history is the only thing liberals are any good at, besides mooching off conservatives of course.

      • barney59

        Welcome to the Disqus world!

      • Joe Schmoe

        Mooching off someone like you means someone took your bag of empty cheap beer cans from behind your trailer

  • MrUniteUs1

    What was the purpose of the anti-Muhammad video?
    Name the Republican Koran burning pastor that sent the video Arab media outlets.
    What countries asked the youtube to block people from their countries from seeing the video.
    What American presidential candidate attacked Americans while Americans were under attack in Egypt and Libya?

    • Daniel_Greenfield

      Who was the future presidential candidate who assured the grieving parents that a man would go to jail for making a blasphemous YouTube video?

      http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/white-house-ordered-prosecution-of-mohammed-filmmaker/

      Hillary Clinton

      Seems like maybe she should go to jail for abuse of power and violating the Constitution.

      • MrUniteUs1

        Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, was found guilty of bank fraud.
        Part of his probation was that he was not to use a computer.

        He violated probation when he put the video on youtube. He went back to jail.
        Fox, AP, and the Wall street journal bought his story that he Jewish and the film was financed by Jews. Why do you suppose he told that lie? Should those media outlets apologize for reporting that he was Jewish without verifiying. In reality he is Coptic Christian.

        • Daniel_Greenfield

          The father of Tyrone Woods, the ex-Navy SEAL killed in Benghazi, met with Obama and Clinton. And he reports that Clinton told him that they were going to “arrest and prosecute” the man behind the Mohammed movie.

          http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/white-house-ordered-prosecution-of-mohammed-filmmaker/

          “Well, this is what Hillary did. She came over and, you know, she did the same thing, separately came over and talked with me. I gave her a hug, shook her hand, and she did not appear to be one bit sincere at all. She mentioned that thing about, “We’re going to have that person arrested and prosecuted that did the video.” That was the first time I had even heard about anything like that.”

          The fact that there was a pretext for locking him up does not change the fact this was a politically motivated prosecution orchestrated by Hillary Clinton.

          Unless you want to call the father of a murdered SEAL a liar.

          • hiernonymous

            There are a couple of logic gaps here.

            First, a promise by the Secretary of State to arrest and prosecute the maker of the video does not demonstrate that a subsequent arrest and prosecution of said maker of video was in response to her promise. You have a long way to go in proving a politically motivated prosecution orchestrated by Hillary Clinton. The reported comment is a reason to pay attention and investigate, not to take the lazy way out and simply make an assumption.

            Second, are you suggesting that fathers of murdered SEALs are any more or less subject to human failings than any other person? That seems more an attempt to play on emotions to shut down discussion than a logically defensible statement.

          • Pete

            “First, a promise by the Secretary of State to arrest and prosecute the maker of the video does not demonstrate that a subsequent arrest and prosecution of said maker of video was in response to her promise.”

            Naw, she did not make it happen. She was just the part of the group that was going to make it happen. She knew that her faction was looking for a scape goat and she was okay with it. She was so okay with it that she used it to try to assuage the feeling of the father of Tyrone Woods.

            The fact is is that Ben Ghazi was CIA operation and the ambassador was in the middle of it. Some Salafi groups didn’t like us despite that we were helping directly or indirectly the Salafi cause in Syria, They attacked and the administration response to the attack was slow indifferent and uncaring.

            & don’t forget that security was lax despite please for more money.

            But you keep carrying water for the administration, Hillary and Susan Rice.

            Susan Rice made a another big gaff, this with Turkey.

            Maybe you can write up an apologia for it too.

          • hiernonymous

            Did you find something incorrect or illogical in my post, or did you simply want to complain about what you assume my broader political sympathies to be?

          • Pete

            If you refuse to see Hillary as part of a faction that while it has infighting are sympatico and are fellow travellers. Then I cannot help you.

            If some local, state or federal law enforcement had seen the video on their own and connected the dots and the film maker had gone to jail, I would not have a problem.

            But I know d_mn well the order came from above so as to find a cape goat for the administration.

            Just because I do not have an email or a taped telephone call does not mean it did not happen. Absence of proof is not proof of absence. I am going by the facts I know and by a track record of a particular group.

          • Dan Knight

            Pete, actually those of us who have prowled the halls at night know the situation is ‘worse.’ They do not have to make any calls because they already their little marching order manuals – some quite specific – on how to falsify, cover up, spin, respond, and so forth. … And no I can’t tell you how I know.

          • truebearing

            “First, a promise by the Secretary of State to arrest and prosecute the maker of the video does not demonstrate that a subsequent arrest and prosecution of said maker of video was in response to her promise. You have a long way to go in proving a politically motivated prosecution orchestrated by Hillary Clinton. The reported comment is a reason to pay attention and investigate, not to take the lazy way out and simply make an assumption.”

            Most of what happens in the world of human thought occurs outside of courtrooms and philosophical debates, and for good reason. Common sense, intuition, and past history inform us much more quickly, and without the mindless, paralyzing quibbling with those who live to obscure truth with parsing and pettifogging.

            “Second, are you suggesting that fathers of murdered SEALs are any more or less subject to human failings than any other person? That seems more an attempt to play on emotions to shut down discussion than a logically defensible statement.”

            Leave it to you to misinterpret Daniel’s comment. Of course, you struggled to force it into a logical context when it was merely a simple challenge to a practiced liar.

          • hiernonymous

            You intuited all of this, did you?

            “Of course, you struggled to force it into a logical context…”

            Yes, I did. You don’t seem to follow the implications of this statement.

          • truebearing

            I didn’t say you succeeded. I said you struggled. There is a difference.

            There are no implications. Your uncharacteristically brief response is perfect testimony to the fact that you have no good defense, or even one worth pretending is legitimate.

          • hiernonymous

            “I didn’t say you succeeded. I said you struggled. There is a difference.”

            Of course there is. Much as you struggle to understand what you read, and sometimes you nearly succeed. In this case, the point being made to you was that the original post was so deficient on logic that it was naturally a struggle to fit it into a logical framework. That success was unlikely, and that this is a sad commentary on the original comment, is the very implication whose existence you, being unable to discern it, denied.

            ” Your uncharacteristically brief response is perfect testimony to the fact that you have no good defense for your argument.”

            =”Your post was shorter than usual, therefore you are wrong.”

            You can see why fitting these comments into a logical framework is such a struggle. Think about how remarkably stupid that comment actually is. And those familiar with my posts know that I don’t use that term casually.

          • Daniel_Greenfield

            You have 2 options

            1. Hillary Clinton randomly threatens to arrest and prosecute people in the name of the government who are then arrested for unrelated reasons.

            This still makes her a despot, but an ineffectual one.

            2. The father of the SEAL is a liar

          • hiernonymous

            If those are the only possibilities you could imagine, you think in an oddly limited or ideological fashion. An obvious possibility that you fail to mention is that the father is sincere but mistaken – that he remembers the general tenor but not the exact wording of Clinton’s comment. Slight differences make a great deal of difference in this context, and there’s no reason to suppose that the father possesses a perfect memory.
            Another obvious possibility is that Clinton was speaking to placate a distraught father and had no intention of taking that action or any action. Yet another is that she chose her words poorly and that she meant that she intended to use her influence to make sure that all appropriate and legal means of investigating and bringing to justice the moviemaker.

            Interesting that none of these occurred to you.

          • Daniel_Greenfield

            So you’ve added two more possibilities

            3. Hillary Clinton tried to reassure the father of a dead SEAL by promising to lock up a man who made a YouTube video… instead of his murderers.

            That makes Hillary a pathological liar who only promises to violate the Constitution.

            If this is your idea of salvaging her story, you need to work harder.

            4. The father thought that Hillary was threatening to lock up the man who made the video when she was actually saying how nice the weather was that day.

            “Interesting that none of these occurred to you.

            I guess I’m just not a partisan hack like you.

          • hiernonymous

            “So you’ve added two more possibilities…”

            Yes, I did. The obvious point has nothing to do with ‘salvaging’ anything, and putting a bit more thought into evaluating the possibilities to begin with.

            “I guess I’m just not a partisan hack…”

            You’re not a very good guesser.

            “Hillary Clinton tried to reassure the father of a dead SEAL by promising to lock up a man who made a YouTube video… instead of his murderers.”

            That’s a pretty good point. It’s interesting how many people have focused on convenient political targets instead of the actual murderers.

          • JB Ziggy Zoggy

            You mean how many people on the left have focused on convenient “political” targets instead of the murderers. That’s exactly what the rest of us are pi$$ed off about. Accessories to murder blaming a video clip director.

          • hiernonymous

            That could be one such group. Let’s see if you can puzzle out any others.

          • Daniel_Greenfield

            I would call a major Constitutional violation a significant additional issue.

          • hiernonymous

            I would, too.

            You haven’t established one, though.

          • JB Ziggy Zoggy

            Hey trolltard: if you step in a huge pile of steaming $h!t, do you need to taste it to know for sure that it’s $h!t? Hillary vowed to arrest some unknown “director,” and he was then arrested with full media fanfare by dozens of cops.
            His so called parole violations had nothing to do with it. And oh, yeah. He was subsequently charged with fake crimes relating to the Benghazi debacle. STOP TRYING TO CLAIM NIKOULA’S PUNISHMENT IS NOT A COVER UP OF OBAMA’S DELIBERATE SACRIFICE OF FOUR AMERICANS. THAT IS AN INEFFECTUAL LIE IN THE SERVICE OF EVIL/PERFIDY/SCUMBAGGERY

          • MrUniteUs1

            I don’t see where the father lied.
            She did what she said she was going to do. People that violate probation are sent back to jail everyday. Any particular reason you wanted the guy to stay of jail? What if he stayed out and he found out how to hack your bank account. Then you would be whining about that.
            The video caused protest some of them violent, as far away as Australia. At least 50 people including and American in Afghanistan and Israeli solider because of the video. . Al Qeada called for a worldwide jihad. Some the people fighting for ISIL were probably upset about the video. Did you see any of the violence demonstrations in other countries as a result of the video.

          • truebearing

            Hillary did what she said she was going to do…exactly. She had a man imprisoned for making an anti-Muslim video, just like Daniel said. She didn’t promise to punish the guy at a banker’s conference. It was at what could be characterised as a State Department wake for one of the murdered SEALs that Clinton got killed.

            Videos don’t cause Muslims to be violent. The Quran does that. You are making an argument against free speech, so I suggest you curtail your own since it has no inherent value and is calculated to obscure the truth.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Videos, cartoons, books, considered insulting to the Prophet Muhammad have incited violence from some Muslims.
            Why do you suppose the video was made?

          • Daniel_Greenfield

            Muslims have been engaged in violence long before the existence of YouTube

          • MrUniteUs1

            Quite true. That’s what Nakoula and the Koran burning pastor were counting on. They wanted the anti-Prophet Muhammad video to anger Muslims and incite violence. Why do you suppose Nakoula lied and said he and the film backers were Jews in America?

          • Daniel_Greenfield

            Did you know that only a fool believes that a series of attacks coordinated across the region on a single day against the same targets on the anniversary of 9/11 were not a spontaneous movie review?

          • MrUniteUs1

            Video American businesses attacked in Lebanon

            in reaction to anti Prophet Muhammad film.

            http://rt.com/news/kfc-tripoli-lebanon-fire-140/

          • JB Ziggy Zoggy

            Terrorists did not choose the anniversary of 911 to attack American Embassies and Consulates because of a video clip they never saw.
            Why do you suppose the terrorists didn’t try to blame the video clip at the time of the attacks? Hm?

            You are lower than ebola dung.

          • JB Ziggy Zoggy

            So Hillary had Nikoula jailed for a petty and unconstitutional parole violation so she could punish the man she falsely claimed was responsible for the murder of four Americans, and you are happy about that? She lied. She didn’t provide the requested security in Benghazi and when the 911 anniversary terrorist attack began, military intervention forces were ordered to stand down.

            The Obama administration is irrefutably guilty of deserting those four men and every other innocent American who was there. It is irrefutably guilty of concocting an idiotic scapegoat to cover up its crime.

            Just PRETEND to be a man and admit that you will defend President Ebola no matter what he does, you human turd.

        • truebearing

          Hillary and Obama weren’t remotely interested in prosecuting the violation of probation. They needed a fall guy and a pretense, but he was arrested because of the video…a legal video even if he violated his probation by making it.

          The fact that he lied is irrelevant. He isn’t the president or SOS. He won’t be running for the presidency. He was just a Coptic Christian trying to fight back against Muslims who were crucifying Christians in his homeland of Egypt. It is amazing that the Obama administration even knew about his lousy video. They must have looked real hard for someone to blame.

          • MrUniteUs1

            What do you think about the filmmaker pretending to be
            Jewish? Fox bought that lie without verification. Spreading that lie got some people killed

            Note Fox was one of the first to blame the violence in Benghazi on the video.

            Filmmaker Sam Bacile in hiding after anti-Muslim film sparks violence in which American diplomat was killed

            An Israeli filmmaker based in California went into hiding
            Tuesday after his movie attacking Islam’s Prophet Muhammad sparked angry
            assaults by ultra-conservative Muslims on U.S. missions in Egypt and
            Libya, where a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans were killed.

            Bacile, a California real estate developer who identifies himself as
            an Israeli Jew, said he believes the movie will help his native land by
            exposing Islam’s flaws to the world.

            “Islam is a cancer, period,” he said repeatedly, his solemn voice thickly accented.

            The two-hour movie, “Innocence of Muslims,” cost $5 million to make
            and was financed with the help of more than 100 Jewish donors, said
            Bacile, who wrote and directed it.

            http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2012/09/12/filmmaker-sam-bacile-in-hiding-after-anti-muslim-film-sparks-violence-in-which/

          • Daniel_Greenfield

            I’m far less interested in Bacile’s scumbaggery than I am in a man being locked up by Hillary Clinton because he made a video.

          • MrUniteUs1

            His scumbaggery incited violence against Jews and Americans.

            He used computers to commit bank fraud. He was banned from using computers while on probation. He used a computer to post the video and possilbly edit the video. Do you think he should have been locked up.

          • truebearing

            His video didn’t cause anything. The teachings of Islam are what caused the violence and the treachery of Obama and Hillary is what left 4 Americans with no protection and no rescue.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Afghan woman’s suicide bombing was revenge for anti-Islam film, says radical group

            At least 12 killed, mostly foreigners, in Kabul blast

            Read more: Afghan woman’s suicide bombing was revenge for anti-Islam film, says radical group | The Times of Israel http://www.timesofisrael.com/afghan-womans-suicide-bombing-was-revenge-for-anti-islam-film-says-radical-islamist-group/#ixzz3GC5hdhfr

            Follow us: @timesofisrael on Twitter | timesofisrael on Facebook

          • JB Ziggy Zoggy

            After the fact, trolltard. No such claims were made BEFORE the attack.

            You are defending islamic atrocities to protect President Ebola. The same Prezzy who aids and abets jihad at every opportunity. You are a scum sucking piece of $h!t.

          • JB Ziggy Zoggy

            Why are you condemning Bacile out of one side of your mouth and excusing Obama and Hillary out of the other? Are you f****** insane?

          • truebearing

            It is trivial in the context of Hillary’s treachery. It is laughable that you think you have discovered some kind of neutralizing moral equivalency. You haven’t. You’re grasping at straws.

            Fox News didn’t put anyone in jail for making an anti-Muslim video. They aren’t responsible for letting an ambassador get assassinated. They aren’t responsible for an essential part of our government. They didn’t conspire to arm Al Qaeda. They didn’t lie and try to cover up the reprehensible, depraved indifference of both Hillary and Obama.

            That film didn’t spark anything but derision over its childish production values. We know Al Qaeda was looking for a symbolic attack on the anniversary of 9/11. Anyone with the brain of a mudskipper could have figured out that the Islamists would try something, especially in an area as volatile as Obama and Hillary made Libya.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Fox News, AP, and Wall Street are guilty of blood libel.
            They falsely reported that Jews made and financed the movie.

            Anti-film reaction claims Israeli victim

            The terror group Ansar
            Beit al-Maqdes said on Sunday it had carried out the attack. The group
            claimed it was in revenge for the controversial film, which has sparked
            outrage in the Muslim world over its depiction of the prophet Muhammad.

            In a statement posted online, the group claimed it was behind the deadly
            attack.

            The statement said: “After finding out that Jews were involved in this
            matter, are motivating the hostile group of foreign pigs [the film’s
            producers], took part in the film’s production and encouraged this
            shameful crime, and because protecting the prophet’s honour is one of
            our duties, your brothers from the Ansar Beit al-Maqdes organisation
            decided to punish the Jews for their heinous crimes”.

            http://www.jewishnews.net.au/anti-film-reaction-claims-israeli-victim/27755

          • JB Ziggy Zoggy

            After the fact, @$$wipe.

            You need to brush up on your trolling tactics. Just pasting a pre-approved script isn’t good enough.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Pre approved by Jewishnews???

          • JB Ziggy Zoggy

            Now Benghazi is the fault of Fox News? You forgot to implicate the Koch bros and George Bush.

            Fact: The State dept refused necessary requests for additional security in Benghazi.

            Fact: When the terrorists attacked, Obama was apprised of the situation.

            Fact: After Obama was apprised, rescue forces were ordered to stand down.

            Fact: The Obama administration knew the terrorists were motivated by islam to attack vulnerable American Embassies and Consulates on the anniversary of 911 but instead blamed a video clip that the terrorists did not claim was their motivation.

            Fact: You are a despicable scumbag.

          • MrUniteUs1

            What about Judge Segal?

            “Citing a lengthy pattern of
            deception and the potential to flee, U.S. Central District Chief
            Magistrate Judge Suzanne Segal ordered Nakoula to remain in prison
            without bond until another judge can hold a hearing to determine if he
            broke the terms of his probation.”

        • JB Ziggy Zoggy

          What does any of that have to do with Hillary personally arranging Nikouka’s arrest and continuing to lie about Americans being murdered over a video clip? How could a video clip possibly justify the desertion of four Americans even if it were true? How does it excuse Obama’s attempt to cover up his culpability?

          You lie like a leftist. Blatantly, poorly and unrepentantly in the service of evil. How proud you must be.

          • MrUniteUs1

            According to interviews with people that live in Benghazi people were upset about the video. So upset that the Libyan government asked youtube to block Libyans from seeing the video. Just hearing about the video was enough

          • JB Ziggy Zoggy

            Trollfail. The terrorists said they weren’t motivated by the video clip. Cretin.

    • JB Ziggy Zoggy

      How was the video CLIP “anti-Muhammad?” It depicted him exactly as the koran, sira and hadiths do. Exactly as islamopithecines around the world believe him to have been. More importantly, why do you think there must be no “slander” of the prophet pretender of the moon rock allah?

      Name the reason islamopithecines chose the anniversary of 911 to attack the compound in Benghazi if what they supposedly were upset about was a video clip. Why didn’t they attack Nakoula or Youtube? Why are you stupid and deceitful enough to push video excuse canard long after it was exposed? Why do you support an rrefutably evil man like Obama with such stupid lies? Do you have any shame or honor whatsoever?

      If we ever met in person you’d lose some teeth, tough guy. And yes I know you’re a White lefty pretending to be an angry Black man.

      • MrUniteUs1

        Why no attacks on the 2002 – 2011 anniversaries of the 911 attack?

        Why no attacks on the 2013 -2014 anniveraries?.

        Why only on the 2012 anniversary? .
        Maybe because Koran burning pastor sent the offensive anti Muhammad video to Arab muslim media outlets on night before the 2012 anniversary. Maybe because they were told movie was made and financed by Jews in America.

        • JB Ziggy Zoggy

          Maybe all the other attacks on the anniversaries of 911 were thwarted? Maybe Hillary and Obama wanted to pretend Al Qaeda was destroyed for the 2012 elections.

          Stupid lowlife.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Maybe because 2012, was the only year the offensive anti Muhammad was released on the anniversary of 9-11. The attack in Benghazi occurred after the video aired and after Al Qaeda called for a jihad in response to the video.

  • Hard Little Machine

    At this point Panetta’s lifelong revolving door through high level government jobs has GOT to be some kind of RICO statute criminal conspiracy. If he gets a job in the Hillary regime someone should check his finances to find the precise date his manipulation of Federal contracts made him a billionaire.

  • cree

    So if it is no one’s fault, it can only fall to Chris Stevens for Sean Smith’s, Glen Doherty’s and Tyrone Wood’s deaths, including his own. It must be Chris’s fault as Ambassador for not obtaining the necessary security needed, especially in light of the facts of active intelligence and previous incidences of attacks. Panetta was gracious enough and politically correct in leaving the obvious not said. What difference does it make now anyway?

    And the apprehension of Ahmed Abu Khattala was a mistake and should be let go; it was not his fault either.

    Therefore, Panetta fulfills all the qualifications to serve in a Hillary regime for his politically correct talking points on Diane Rehm’s show. We are so privileged by such capable leadership and hope will remain but only if the privileged elect Hillary to keep America transformed.

  • Chris Gait

    Rice doesn’t work for the CIA, neither do comrades Clinton or Obama. So something stinks in Denmark. And it ain’t last week’s herring.

  • AgentInfidel

    Lying liars lie.

  • NJK

    I’m wondering if Trey Gowdy’s investigation is a farce also.

    October 11, 2014 4:00 AM Why Won’t Republicans Get to the Bottom of Benghazi?
    It’s not just Democrats who don’t want a full public airing. By Andrew C. McCarthy

    http://www.nationalreview.com/article/390098/why-wont-republicans-get-bottom-benghazi-andrew-c-mccarthy

  • truebearing

    Nobody is ever to blame when leftists commit crimes. It’s all a big, whacky misunderstanding. Blame is only applicable to the Left’s enemies.

  • camp7

    “where, of course as you know, there was a violent protest outside of our embassy, sparked by this hateful video.”
    ~ Susan Rice

    “What difference – at this point, what difference does it make?”
    ~ Hillary Clinton

    “nobody is to blame for Benghazi.”
    “those talking points were wrong.”
    ~ Pannetta

    How did I know, what I thought I knew, left more to know, that I didn’t know? Now I know.

    Thanks for clarifying that Leon.

  • Patriot077

    And even prior to the evening of the attack, Hillary and her staff continually denied requests for added security at the Benghazi outpost. There is plenty of blame to be laid right on Hillary’s doorstep regardless of what that pimp Panetta has to say about it!

  • ca1

    Panetta: “Nobody is to Blame for Benghazi.”….. keep telling yourself that leon, does it help you sleep better at night?

  • MrUniteUs1

    Calif. man behind anti-Muslim film ordered jailed

    Citing a lengthy pattern of
    deception and the potential to flee, U.S. Central District Chief
    Magistrate Judge Suzanne Segal ordered Nakoula to remain in prison
    without bond until another judge can hold a hearing to determine if he
    broke the terms of his probation.

    “The court has a lack of trust in this defendant at this time,” Segal said.

    Prosecutors
    noted Nakoula had eight probation violations, including lying to his
    probation officers and using aliases. He could face new charges that
    carry a maximum two-year prison term.

    http://news.yahoo.com/calif-man-behind-anti-muslim-film-ordered-jailed-012117266.html

    • JB Ziggy Zoggy

      Are you proud that Obama is using a corrupt “criminal justice” system to persecute a scapegoat? Does that bring you pleasure? Don’t even TRY to pretend that the persecution of Nakoula is anything but the Obamaburo trying to cover up its crimes. Those lies don’t work at all.

      • MrUniteUs1

        What do you think about Nakoula telling media outlets that he was an Israeli and the the anti-Muhammad film was made by Jews in America. The result was that Jews and Americans were attack.

        Personally I think Nakoula should have been deported after doing prison time for bank fraud. So you think Judge Suzanne Segal, the prosecutor , and the entire criminal justice system is corrupt.

        Read the article, read about Nakoula’s multiple probation violations
        Do you think he should have been arrested?

  • Gee

    And the Department of Defense aided the Hillary in the murders by not allowing any aid to go to Benghazi or asking any help from American allies in the region that had a lot of firepower and training available for the asking

  • JT

    Yes. He wants to be Hillary’s VP. Also he knows firsthand that Obama refused help during their 5PM meeting which probably sounded like this.
    SECDEF (Panetta): “Sir, General Ham says AFRICOM is ready to launch a rescue attempt. I just need you to grant Cross Border Authorization.”

    POTUS: “Uh. Uh. Uh. Valerie?”
    VJ: “Leon, the President says he is not authorizing any military response from outside of Libya.”
    POTUS: “What she said.”.

    Panetta knows Obama lied when he gave an order to secure our people. I’m sure asked for Presidential Cross Border Authority and was denied.

  • MrUniteUs1

    Muhammad film: reaction around the Middle East

    A film that sparked an attack on a US consulate in Libya has caused uproar from Algeria to Afghanistan

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/sep/12/muhammad-film-reaction-middle-east

    • JB Ziggy Zoggy

      Citing “The Guardian” is as reliable as citing Pinnochio. Your linked in lies are all after the fact. NONE of the terrorists made your facile claims BEFORE their attacks.

      No. Obams is a criminally insane piece of $h!t who lies constantly. He allowed Americans to be murdered because he’s a scumbag, and he lied to cover it up because he’s a scumbag.

      Just like you, @$$dweeb.

      • MrUniteUs1

        The fact is millions of Muslims were upset when they heard about the anti Muslim and some of them reacted violently. The were told it was an American made movie financed by Jews.

        • JB Ziggy Zoggy

          The “consulate” in Benghazi had nothing to do with any video clip, and the terrorist attack against it was preplanned. The terrorists say that the video clip had nothing to do with their attack.

          Obama is lying and so are you.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Were Fox, AP, and the Wall Street journal lying when they blamed the video?

          • Daniel_Greenfield

            They were repeating a government lie.

          • MrUniteUs1

            They were repeating the Egyptian filmmaker’s lie. Why did the filmmaker lie? Because he wanted Muslims to believe Jews and Americans made the film? Why?

            (RNS) Respected news outlets unwittingly sent a lie around the world on Sept.12: a Jew backed by 100 Jewish donors made a film insulting Islam’s Prophet Muhammad.

            Within a day, the lie unraveled. But the damage to the Jewish community had been done, and Jews will continue to suffer for it, say Jewish civil rights leaders.

            “This is another blood libel that’s in place,” said Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, referring to a history of conspiracy theories that has fueled anti-Semitism for centuries.

            http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/30/jews-backed-innocence-of-muslims-conspiracy-theory_n_1924548.html

          • Daniel_Greenfield

            The Egyptian filmmaker didn’t claim that he caused Benghazi. Hillary claimed that.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Why did the Egyptian Filmmaker the movie?

  • MrUniteUs1

    Video Muslim Rage: Over 50 killed in 30-nation Islamic protest wave.

    But not Libya????

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_lr4KUwAKI

    • JB Ziggy Zoggy

      The attack at Benghazi was preplanned, you unmitigated cretin.

      • MrUniteUs1

        People interviewed in Benghazi including the guards, said the attack was in response to the movie. This was reported by new reporters on the ground in Benghazi foreign and domestic.
        What about the attacks and protest in the other 29 countries?
        Why did Libya, call on youtube to block the anti-prophet Muhammad movie .

        • Daniel_Greenfield

          It wasn’t a protest wave.

          It was a series of coordinated attacks by Al Qaeda sympathizers built around September 11.

          Also the original September 11 was not a protest.

  • Dan Knight

    LOL Daniel: Par for Hillary’s wannabe lap dog.

    • MrUniteUs1

      Leon is a switch hitter with a book to sale.

      • Dan Knight

        LOL, you’re right about that. I am sure his self-interest is the controlling factor.

  • MrUniteUs1

    You sound like Hillary Clinton. He knew that offending the the Prophet Muhammad would incite Muslim violence. It’s happened before. Ever heard of Salman Rushdie? He somehow thought that if he could redirect Muslim hatred and violence against Coptic Christians, towards

    • Daniel_Greenfield

      Mohammed is dead. He can’t be offended.

      Right now you know you’re offending me. Should you be sent to prison for it?