Republican and Democratic Cuban-American Senators Blast Obama’s Dirty Castro Deal

GTY_obama_raul_castro_jef_131210_16x9_992

Two Cuban-American senators, Marco Rubio and Robert Menendez, from different sides of the political aisle had very strong words for Obama’s dirty deal with the Cuban strongman.

 Two Cuban-American senators bashed the Obama Administration’s decision to release three Cubans held by the United States on the same day Cuba released an American contractor it had held for five years.

New Jersey Democratic Senator Robert Menendez slammed the Administration, calling it an “asymmetrical trade”—a description the Administration rebuts—that “sets a dangerous precedent” and will “invite further belligerence toward Cuba’s opposition movement and the hardening of the government’s dictatorial hold on its people.”

“It invites dictatorial and rogue regimes to use Americans serving overseas as bargaining chips,” said Menendez, the outgoing chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, in a statement. “I fear that today’s actions will put at risk the thousands of Americans that work overseas to support civil society, advocate for access to information, provide humanitarian services, and promote democratic reforms.”

“The President’s decision to reward the Castro regime and begin the path toward the normalization of relations with Cuba is inexplicable,” said Rubio in a statement. “Cuba, like Syria, Iran, and Sudan, remains a state sponsor of terrorism…Appeasing the Castro brothers will only cause other tyrants from Caracas to Tehran to Pyongyang to see that they can take advantage of President Obama’s naiveté during his final two years in office. As a result, America will be less safe as a result of the President’s change in policy.”

It’s not naivete. Obama knows exactly what Castro is. This is at best collaboration. At worst ideologies allies working together.

U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio slammed the Obama administration Wednesday, accusing it of “tyranny” in a speech responding to the news that the U.S. and Cuba will restore full diplomatic relations.

Rubio said there were “no assurances of advances in democracy and freedom” in return for the lifting of a decades-long embargo against the country.

“No binding commitment was made,” Rubio said. “In exchange for all of these concessions, the only thing the Cuban government agreed to do was to release 53 political prisoners … and allow the United Nations and the Red Cross to monitor conditions on the island.”

He went on to call Obama “the worst negotiator” he has seen in his lifetime.

“His foreign policy is more than just naive. It is willfully ignorant of the way the world really works,” Rubio added.

He went on to say that “by conceding to these oppressors, [President Barack Obama has] let the people of Cuba down,” arguing that the move will boost Cuban President Raúl Castro’s hold on power.

For Obama that’s not a bug. It’s a feature.

Here is Rubio’s full statement.

“Today’s announcement initiating a dramatic change in U.S. policy toward Cuba is just the latest in a long line of failed attempts by President Obama to appease rogue regimes at all cost.

“Like all Americans, I rejoice at the fact that Alan Gross will be able to return to his family after five years in captivity. Although he is supposedly being released on humanitarian grounds, his inclusion in a swap involving intelligence agents furthers the Cuban narrative about his work in Cuba. In contrast, the Cuban Five were spies operating against our nation on American soil. They were indicted and prosecuted in a court of law for the crimes of espionage and were linked to the murder of the humanitarian pilots of Brothers to the Rescue. There should be no equivalence between the two, and Gross should have been released unconditionally.

“The President’s decision to reward the Castro regime and begin the path toward the normalization of relations with Cuba is inexplicable. Cuba’s record is clear. Just as when President Eisenhower severed diplomatic relations with Cuba, the Castro family still controls the country, the economy and all levers of power. This administration’s attempts to loosen restrictions on travel in recent years have only served to benefit the regime. While business interests seeking to line their pockets, aided by the editorial page of The New York Times, have begun a significant campaign to paper over the facts about the regime in Havana, the reality is clear. Cuba, like Syria, Iran, and Sudan, remains a state sponsor of terrorism. It continues to actively work with regimes like North Korea to illegally traffic weapons in our hemisphere in violation of several United Nations Security Council Resolutions. It colludes with America’s enemies, near and far, to threaten us and everything we hold dear. But most importantly, the regime’s brutal treatment of the Cuban people has continued unabated. Dissidents are harassed, imprisoned and even killed. Access to information is restricted and controlled by the regime. That is why even more than just putting U.S. national security at risk, President Obama is letting down the Cuban people, who still yearn to be free.

“I intend to use my role as incoming Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s Western Hemisphere subcommittee to make every effort to block this dangerous and desperate attempt by the President to burnish his legacy at the Cuban people’s expense. Appeasing the Castro brothers will only cause other tyrants from Caracas to Tehran to Pyongyang to see that they can take advantage of President Obama’s naiveté during his final two years in office. As a result, America will be less safe as a result of the President’s change in policy. When America is unwilling to advocate for individual liberty and freedom of political expression 90 miles from our shores, it represents a terrible setback for the hopes of all oppressed people around the globe.”

  • Bamaguje

    “…Senator Robert Menendez slammed the Administration, calling it an “asymmetrical trade… that sets a dangerous precedent” – International Business Times.

    Bergdahl-Taliban swap readly comes to mind as another ‘asymmetrical trade.’
    Looks to me Obama is trying to hand Cuba’s communist dictatorship another life line now that Venezuela can no longer prop up the Castro tyranny.

    • truebearing

      Or maybe it is Obama propping up Cuba so they can afford to keep troops in Venezuela to protect the regime there. This move could be interpreted as Obama establishing a kind of Marshall Plan for failing Marxist regimes in South America — not to be confused with his Martial Law plan for the US.

      It would also fit his open borders scheme to create a permanent majority of black and brown skinned people who will facilitate the illusion of legitimate elections in One Party Rule America.

  • halevi

    It favors Obama’s allies, so for him it was a good deal.

  • John Pallyswine

    How about carpet boming Castro`s many homes in Cuba? America will invade or proxy-invade or attempt to invade Libya, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan, Laso, Cambodia or Vietnam or Korea for reasons that they obfuscate ( gold). Why not seek regime change in Cuba or will Jay Rockefeller get angry??

  • http://ruleofreason.blogspot.com/ Edward Cline

    Here’s another decrepit irony: Obama is willing to let Mexicans and other South Americans swarm across the border scot free of consequences. Cubans, however, must risk life and limb to paddle from Cuba to Florida, and of course won’t be allowed to “emigrate” from Communist Cuba, not in any numbers at all. They’re prisoners.

  • Texas Patriot

    Daniel, does it make you feel better to know that Lindsey Graham is hopping mad about restoring relations with Cuba? I mean, does that give you a greater comfort level that you’re on the right side on this one? Just wondering.

  • cree

    Isn’t it amazing how evil incarnate Obama can’t recognize evil regimes?

    Edit: Sorry, a brain fart.

    • truebearing

      He recognizes them as allies in evil.

  • JR Kipling

    All this political analysis of what is nothing more than a psychopath acting out.
    Obama does what he does precisely because it destroys.

  • JR Kipling

    What “dangerous” regimes” might those be? Obama has placated and
    enabled.
    1. Iran
    2. North Korea
    3. Venezuela
    4. Cuba
    5. Pakistan
    6. Russia
    7. Red China
    8. Bolivia
    9. ISIS
    10. Taliban
    What are the serious dangers ? ..Oh wait..I know . The Tea Party. ..right?

    • Raymond_in_DC

      Add the PA/PLO to the list of dangerous regimes he’s placated. And add Israel to the list of those deemed “serious dangers” worthy of sanction by this administration.

  • Daniel

    Of course those senators are mad……and full of righteous INDIGNATION! And they are speaking out…..in no UNCERTAIN terms……burning up C-SPAN!!!
    I believe Shakespeare called it……” a tale told by an idiot….full of sound and fury…..signifying nothing.”
    Obama/Castro/Chavez rolls on.

  • Bash Brannigan

    Obama’s speech was odd. It had a tenor of, dare I say, colonialism. He spoke as if Cuba will be America, and he was going to save it.