Sharia Court Rules that Women w/o Hijab are “Sluts” and Can’t Testify

Hijab-002

The case appears to involve an Arab Christian woman from the Jordan Dubai Islamic Bank for not wearing a Hijab. Now an Islamic Sharia Court has ruled about what you expect from an Islamic court.(via Religion of Peace)

Especially when it relies on the Muslim Brotherhood.

The court announced late last week that it agreed with one lawyer’s statement – based on a fatwa – that says a woman who does not cover up or wear a hijab is considered a “slut” and shouldn’t be allowed to testify in court.

“The Amman Sharia Court of Appeal has accepted the lawyer’s objection to a female witness from testifying for not wearing the hijab, which the court said would affect the fairness and honesty in her testimony.

According to the fatwa, which the court’s decision was based on, women who aren’t covered up are “sluts,” and that gives those women a bad name. Furthermore, the court was unable to support this fatwa apart from with something written in the introduction of a book by Egyptian Islamic Theologian Sheikh Yusuf Al Qaradawi.

Yusuf Al Qaradawi is the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood and when he isn’t calling for genocide, he’s calling for terrorism. Also he’s for burning gays to death, beating women and has typically Islamic views on rape.

When asked if female rape victims should be punished under Islam, Qaradawi replied: “To be absolved from guilt, the raped woman must have shown some sort of good conduct.”

You might get the idea that Qaradawi is some ‘whacko extremist’, but his Muslim Brotherhood dominates Muslim organizations in the US and Europe. The campus Muslim Students Association is another Brotherhood front. If you see a spokesman on television, the odds are that he agrees with Qaradawi.

That’s the future of Islam in America.

The Hijab is not a choice. Islam is not a choice. They’re only choices in non-Muslim countries and not always then.

  • A Z

    If Hijab is a choice and not a compulsion if 500 million Muslims women did not wear them for a year, how many additional Muslim women would be beaten, raped or murdered by Muslim men?

  • Aditya Vivek Barot

    Is there the slightest chance that this could be a “lost in translation” thing? This is so fanatically ignorant as it ignores 14 centuries of tradition providing for the testimony of non-Muslims, including unveiled Christian women, in various parts of “Dar-ul-Islam” whereby non-Muslims were allowed to testify but their testimony was accorded half the weight of a Muslim male’s testimony. That, at least, was the system in sultanate and Mughal India and the Ottoman Empire.

    If true, these people are ignorant, fanatic freaks who would, in all likelihood, have been hunted and executed by the Mughals or the ottomans for their fanaticism and ignorance.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      The source is an Arab site so I doubt that it’s a translation issue.

      • Aditya Vivek Barot

        Truly, cousin-f**king has destroyed all human capital in the Arab world. This is a violation of Koranic Injunctions and of the so-called “Pact of Umar” an accord that governed relations between the Muslim State and the “people of the book,” and subsequently, all non-Muslims.

        I am afraid I cannot view these people as fully human. I don’t want them in my country, I don’t want my neighbors and friends in their country.

        Larry Auster’s Theory of Separation never looked so good.

        • Daniel Greenfield

          Accords in the Muslim world tend to be honored in the breach. And don’t expect Wahhabis to honor anything that gets in the way of imposing their latest stringency on everyone.

          Every naturalized Muslim terrorist violated his oath of citizenship. It’s not an issue for Al Qaeda.

          • Aditya Vivek Barot

            You’re one hundred per cent right. May I provide a bit of insight into the Naturalization process with my own observations?

            I was Naturalized on Sep. 30, 2012, Los Angeles, CA along with 2,399 other immigrants of whom the only person who could speak English was the white, Canadian woman who, incidentally, was the only person who would talk to me and who actually sat with me through the ceremony.

            Now, you may wonder how someone with absolutely no knowledge of English can qualify. You don’t need English to qualify. My “exam” took place a month prior where I saw, to my shock, examinees taking the test with their children acting as interpreters.

            What kind of a test? Why, an oral exam, of course! Administered by the case-officer on an ad hoc basis. My case officer didn’t know I was a lawyer and that I had been working, virtually, since the day I immigrated since his first question was “which school do you go to?” Upon being told I was a lawyer, I was asked to:

            1. provide the total number of Senator in Congress;

            2. name the U.S. national anthem; and

            3. explain the “rule of law.”

            Almost everyone, at that Ceremony, flubbed their oath. Almost all of them were giggling and laughing throughout the ceremony. A few snatched phrases of Hindi and Gujarati told me that some them had Canadian/British citizenship as well. All in all, I think it is fair to state that most immigrants violate their oath. Most immigrants have no respect for the U.S. since the U.S. has decided to stop trying to earn anyone’s respect.

            The most infuriating aspect of the ceremony was the idiot Federal Judge schmaltzing about Ellis Island. I wanted to grab him by the lapels and ask him to look around and then look me in the eye and tell me whether the collection of Mestizo peasants, Indian businessmen, AfPak Jihadi, Arabs, assorted unrecognizable ethnicities were like his grandparents and whether this lot, and their children, had a fraction of the Culture, Civilization and Potential as his Family.

            So, the Jihadi breaks his oath in the service of his gang, but what about the rest? Why is this scum here? Why are ungrateful Mestizos, Gujaratis, and others welcomed but people such as the Boers, who have a common Culture and values and have a million times more potential than a 65 year old Punjabi woman here solely to fleece benefits, seemingly prevented from getting so much as a Tourist VISA?

            This country has decided to turn a once glorious constitution in an elaborate suicide pact which is being exploited by anybody and everybody and being exploited remorselessly. It really gets to you, at times, helplessly watching people p** their inheritance away and turn the most land in the world over to 3rd world trash.

          • Daniel Greenfield

            Sad but yes, entirely commonplace. You have sketched out the state of affairs that has brought us to this point.

            It’s not so much that enforcement was ever worth much. In the 19th century, Democratic judges naturalized immigrants for Tammany Hall without even looking at them, but the quality of immigrants was somewhat better and the culture itself was healthier and people couldn’t come here with the expectations of not working.

            Combine a decline in every area and you get disaster.

    • SuperDave2

      “these people are ignorant, fanatic freaks”
      You’ve said it all with this one phrase.

  • truebearing

    Islam is a religion of obsessive judgementalism. These Imams will continue to make increasingly radical rulings until every ruling carries a death sentence. Nothing is too draconian and the more sadistic the better. I have yet to see an Imam hand down a ruling that is forgiving, compassionate, or particularly sane.

    If Islam succeeds in its goal of world domination, it will turn on itself, with opposing doctrinal camps upping the ante on righteousness and handing out death sentences like Obama hands out food stamps. Given enough success, Islam will ultimately destroy itself…which may have been the occult, intended purpose for Islam all along. Islam does hate humanity.

    • Aditya Vivek Barot

      Nah. Not happening. Islam is like the cockroach, a Faith so primitive, in fact, primordial, so in-sync with man’s base nature, that it will outlive truth and beauty because man is fallen and when given a choice between good and evil, beauty and ugliness, we choose wrongly because most of us are stupid, weak, craven, ugly, envious, gluttonous monsters.

  • wileyvet

    Just got my shipment of books today. Where to start? “Muhammad and the Birth of Islamic Supremacism: by David Haydin, “Stop The Islamization of America” by Pamela Geller , ” Understanding Dhimmitude” by Bat Ye’or , ” The Case For Islamophobia ” by Walid Shoebat, and Robert Spencer’s ” Religion of Peace? Why Christianity Is and Islam Isn’t”, “The Truth About Muhammad ” and ” The Complete Infidel’s Guide To The Koran”, “Crucified Again” by Raymond Ibrahim, and finally Niall Ferguson’s ” Civilization: The West and the Rest”. I already have Mr. Spencer’s book on Islam and the Crusades, as well as The Al-Qaeda Reader by Mr. Ibraham. The first two books that opened my eyes about Islam. I am pleased to add these new titles to my library. Talk to you guys in a week or so. I will of course keep on top of Mr. Greenfield’s Score Card of Muslim own goals, hoping March ends with a Bang.

    • CaoMoo

      Prophet of Doom is good too. It’s free to read online. I found it to be a good summary of a lot of my readings.