Swedish Ambulance Workers Want Body Armor Against Machete Attacks

hqdefault

Oddly enough Swedish ambulance workers didn’t need body armor or have to worry about machete attacks before the place became so very diversified. (via Religion of Peace)

“‘- There have been so many incidents. There has been everything from shootings to people with machetes and people smashing ambulances or trying to attack the ambulance staff. We are not safe to the extent we have previously been,’ says Henrik Johansson, president of the Ambulance Association to Dagens Medicin.

He explains that the organisation wants that the alarm center and ambulances should have access to the same information that police have on people who are likely to be violent or have weapons. But the union also wants to introduce what Henrik Johansson calls tactical units.

‘- Emergency Medic teams that are ready to enter a hot spot. They should have riot helmet, bulletproof vest and shin guards. They should have equipment relevant for working in such an environment. They of course also should have a gas mask.

So they will more or less look like the riot police?

‘- No, the military, I would rather like to say.’”

Sweden recognized “Palestine” but it’s the one under occupation.

 

  • Texas Patriot

    What’s lacking in this situation is the recognition that under the precepts laid down by Muhammad and his followers over 1400 years ago, Muslims will be in a state of constant war with non-Muslims until the end of time or entire earth submits to Islam. Since we don’t know when the end of the world is coming, we must therefore assume that Muslims will be in a state of war with non-Muslims indefinitely. If Sweden wants to permit a “war party” within its midst, it certainly has a right to do so, just as Israel does and all of the rest of the non-Muslim nations of the world do. But there should be no illusion about the existence of a permanent state of war with Muslim communities, and if it is determined that such an absurd state of affairs should be permitted to continue, of course the various governments involved should provide adequate equipment for responding to it.

    • kasandra

      You’ve just got to wonder what the Swedes are thinking, or drinking. Thanks to its large scale importation of members of a 7th Century death cult it’s become the rape capital of the universe, has something like 55 “no-go” zones, and it’s EMS workers face machete attacks. And how does it respond? By recognizing the font of modern terrorism, the PA. Is there something in their water?

      • Pete

        The Swedish left is thinking of power, multiculturalism and finally justice.

        Until they start thinking trying to maintain power a little longer and appeasement.

        Plus that I twas somehow the fault of their opposition, because the Muslims are only doing this because of past wrongs.

        Me … I only play civil society until it all falls apart.

        After that point there will be no “I disagree with what you say but I will defend unto my death your right to say it.”

        • kasandra

          Yeah but there were no past wrongs against muslims in Sweden; there were no muslims in Sweden. They invited them in. If if the Swedish leftist cowards think they can maintain power for long in the face of an apparently armed and hostile opposition that doesn’t recognize their values or sovereignty in their own country, they may find themselves sorely mistaken. To me, the Swedish political/culural elite, and their counterparts in most of the rest of Western Europe, have simply lost their will and their minds. This was all predicted in “The Camp of the Saints.” Apparently Europeans, who criticized the novel as racist, didn’t bother reading it or thinking about it. It’s playing out in much the way it did in the book and they don’t even realize it.

          • Pete

            “Yeah but there were no past wrongs against muslims in Sweden; there were no muslims in Sweden.”

            Yes but try telling that to a Swedish socialist who is down for the struggle.

          • kasandra

            Well, leftists are particularly resistant to objective fact and any notion of reality. As I said, they’ve lost their will and their minds. We’re all from the Euphrates now.

          • Suzanne

            You’re right – Europe is turning into a nightmare because of Islam. I often wonder if the Europeans have ANY will to survive at all or contingency plans if and when things really heat up with the Muslims. They is always the possibility that things CAN end peacefully and everyone hopes for that but so far the Muslims are implacable in their desire to dominate and here you have ambulance drivers, for G_d’s sakes, begging for protection! In my opinion Europe needs to do three or four things in order to survive. (1) Europe should now be actively advocating for their terminations as members in the European Union which has only brought misery and grief to them. (2) Europe should be preparing for the possibility of large scale civil unrest with their Muslim populations and developing the necessary (non Muslim only) civil defense and military forces needed to combat this threat. (At the end, in order to survive as truly European countries, they may have to deport many, many non European peoples back to their countries of origin whether these people have “legal citizenship” or not). (3) Europeans need to get their birthrates way, way up. (4) – and this is related to number 3 – The Europeans have to develop some sort of relationship with G_d or respectable religion in order to believe in anything at all and, therefore, have the will to live. But it seems that all this is completely hallucinatory to them now. I never hear they’re moving towards anything of this sort. Instead what they do is running to their parliaments and demanding that Israel (who has the exact same problems as themselves) commit national suicide with the perfidious “two state solution”.

          • knowshistory

            preparing for the possibility of large scale civil unrest? no. Europeans who wish to survive should be causing large scale civil unrest. it is time for large mobs of Europeans to be massively killing their muslim invading enemies, but first they will have to execute their treasonous governments. the time for legal opposition is way past. it is time for armed insurrection, and correction of the problem.

  • Hard Little Machine

    That discriminates against Muslim’s Allah given right to express the tenets of their quaint and ancient culture.

    • Hi there

      I say, give them the right to die.
      Let freedom be heard throughout the land.
      They throw rocks at ambulances because they’re so desperate to die and let die.
      Where’s all the tolerance for their deep-seated wishes?

  • Pete

    Will Heironymous deign to comment on this story?

    Heironymous and American stalk this site as well as Truth Revolt. but seriously does the world look more like that depicted by the contributors and posters to FPM or what they think it looks like?

    This is a hip pocket tpy e story. Which works really well with smart phones. When someone talks about the joys and accomplishments of Liberal /socialist Europe, you pull out this story.

    … because really who has been in charge for most of the time?

    • Texas Patriot

      Hiernonymous and Americana are more astute about this issue than you may think. What they object to is the unfair criticism of Barak Obama when for the most part, he is not any worse than any of the other Western politicians in America or Europe who have taken positions on this issue. My guess is that there are few people anywhere who still fail to see the horrific cultural mistake Western nations have made in assuming that all cultures and all religions are committed to Western ideals of individual freedom, human rights, and constitutional democracy. At this point, the only issue remaining is what to do about it.

      • Pete

        “he is not any worse than any of the other Western politicians in America or Europe who have taken positions on this issue.”

        George Bush would not have made the Cairo speech.

        “What they object to is the unfair criticism of Barak Obama”
        - George Bush would not have taken troops out of Iraq. He would have worked harder to obtain a SOFA. Mosul would most likely not have fallen.

        - George Bush is for amnesty. However, he would not do it through executive actions. Back in 2007 he backed off.
        Second time around he might have got the border closed 1st. Obama’s bootlicker, Napolitano per script threw up her hands and said the border fence could not be built.

        “Hiernonymous and Americana ”

        Americana is for the “Beyond Marriage” people. there is no way that she is astute. There is no difference between American posting here and an avid reader of Salon or Daily Kos posting here. If there is, it is due to noise in the system.

        • Texas Patriot

          George Bush made plenty of absurd and ridiculous speeches he would probably not make today, and the same goes for Barack Obama. The truth is that the West has been slowly waking up from a long slumber about the reality of Islamic Jihad, and most of us are only now beginning to see it clearly for what it is, both in a historical context and an ideological context based on the teachings and life example of Muhammad and his followers. Otherwise, the situation in Iraq is a complete nightmare that cannot be solved with the presence of American troops, and George Bush knew that when he signed the force withdrawal agreement in which we committed to leave Iraq like we did.

          • Pete

            Saying Putin had a good heart was cringe inducing. Still it does not compare to Obama’s Cairo speech.

            “George Bush knew that when he signed the force withdrawal agreement in which we committed to leave Iraq like we did.”

            That was an interim agreement.

          • Texas Patriot

            As I’ve stated before, my view is that Obama was America’s good will gesture to the Muslim world that we don’t object to you because of your race or your religion or your ethnicity, and we recognize that there are many positive aspects to Islam, and therefore we want to be your friend and help you get rid of all of the horrible terrorists within your midst. All that changed on 9/11/12 when the Libyan rebels we assisted in overthrowing Gaddafi turned on us and assassinated our diplomats at Benghazi to the worldwide Muslim chants of “Obama, Obama, We’re All Osama.” Although Obama may be the last man in the room to the reality of the true threat represented by global Islamic Jihad, there is no going back to the Cairo Speech or to pre-Benghazi naivete regarding the civilizational threat we see throughout the world today.

          • Pete

            “As I’ve stated before, my view is that Obama was America’s good will gesture to the Muslim world that we don’t object to you because of your race or your religion or your ethnicity, ”

            It was necessary 2 generations after the Immigration act of 1965?

            It was necessary after George Bush went out of his way to court the Muslim vote?

            It might be necessary after the conversation ( A few years ago, this guy would have been carrying our bags.) between the Democrat stalwarts Ted Kennedy and Bill Clinton leaked out.

            “All that changed on 9/11/12 when the Libyan rebels we assisted in overthrowing Gaddafi turned on us and assassinated our diplomats at Benghazi to the worldwide Muslim chants of “Obama, Obama, We’re All Osama.” ”

            Where have you been? There was trouble well before that. Try the 1990s. Try London in the 1990s.

          • Texas Patriot

            Pete: Where have you been?

            I was asleep like everybody else. Now I’m waking up like everybody else. Here’s a heads up for you. Obama is not the problem. The problem is that we still have no clear vision or leadership on how to respond effectively to the global threat of Islamic Jihad, and until we have that, wailing about how bad this or that leader is doesn’t solve a thing.

            Think about this. Mitt Romney and many other of the usual Republican flunkies want to reintroduce American combat soldiers into Iraq. Brilliant, isn’t it? Unfortunately, that would end no differently than it did before with American soldiers as sitting ducks in a shooting gallery not being able to tell their friends from their enemies. Yet that is all the so-called defense minded Republicans can come up with. Absolute insanity.

            The only effective response to crisis we fact today is to identify the problem as one of a conflicting and inconsistent ideology that is totally incompatible with Western ideals of individual freedom, human rights, and constitutional democracy, and to begin reversing the disastrous trend of immigration by individuals who embrace that ideology. Everything else is a waste of time, money, and men.

          • Pete

            An Iraqi parliamentary system might have worked. If it had worked maybe there would be no need for a Muslim 30 Years War. Although history repeats itself , but with a twist. Just because this might look like a Muslim 30 years war does not mean that it will turn out the same way. They could still fight just as viciously after 30 years as they do now.

            Iran had too much influence. I think Bush or someone like him would have done a better job of reigning in Maliki’s sectarianism. Obama just let Iraq go on auto-pilot and let the Shia Maliki do whatever he pleased to the Sunni.

            But I don’t think you see that. I think you are still a sleeper.

          • Texas Patriot

            Pete: I think Bush or someone like him would have done a better job of reigning in Maliki’s sectarianism.

            I seriously doubt that I am more of a sleeper than you are, but who knows. What i do see clearly enough is that Shia and Sunni have been at war for 1400 years, and in the realm of Islamic politics, the Sunni-Shia conflict supersedes all other issues. Maliki is a Shia, and never had any sympathy for the Sunnis. Ask any Sunni if they think the U.S. should have supported Maliki, and 99 out of 100 would probably say NO WAY. But go ahead and pretend. If you need to assume that little factoid in order to maintain your hatred for Obama, go right ahead. Knock yourself out. Hatred is an addiction, and most of the people of the world would much prefer the easy fix of hatred rather than being forced to do the hard work of truth. Sweet dreams.

          • Pete

            So we should have rigged the elections so that 55% of the people would not have voted for the guy elected?

            Maliki was brutalized. He learned many of the wrong lessons. It does not mean that someone like Bush could not have used carrots and sticks to get him to treat the Sunni and Kurds right.

            What were we going to do say a Kurd or a Sunni was PM?

            Bush talked to Maliki every day. What did Obama do? Scratch his balls and think about it once a month?

            Maliki has physical courage. When Shia rebels rose up in Basra, he charge down there set up shop and crushed them. The American general in charge thought he was going to get killed. He has part of what is needed to be a good leader. If we would have put Maliki under our thumb long enough and hard enough so that he would go after Sunni politicians, this might have worked. In the past there has been a lot of Shia-Sunni intermarriage. So yes it is possible.

            It is possible that we could have told Maliki don’t worry about coup, we are here to back up the legitimately elected PM. All the while we could have also told him don’t be an @zz. But all Obama did all day long was telegraph to the world “We are out of here!” As soon as the 1st Tuesday of November 2008 rolled around Maliki knew that he would have to rely on the Shia and/or Iran.

            He had no faith in playing fair. If we just could have told him that we would backstop him, maybe it would have worked. But America only backstops an ally until the next election.

          • Texas Patriot

            What makes you think Iraq is an “ally” of the United States in any sense of the word? As Benjamin Netanyahu said, when your enemies want to kill each other, weaken both, but help neither.

          • Pete

            Iraq had the same potential to be an ally as Germany or Japan had in 1945/1946.

            I did not look at the whole purple finger thing and elections as a publicity stunt.

          • Texas Patriot

            Like most Westerners, it would appear that you view the Middle East through the lens of your own worldview, which is one that presupposes and posits the existence of functioning secular governments that can be relied on as economic partners and military allies.

            From my point of view, that is mere wishful thinking, and that the truth of the matter is that the sham governments set up in the aftermath of WWI and the collapse of the Ottoman Empire were mere ruses and subterfuges created by and through the vainglory of the West and tolerated by the treacherous East for the sole purpose of deceiving and defrauding the West and draining the blood and treasure of the West, and in that regard they were supremely successful from the point of view of the East.

            Taking a broader and more objective view of history, however, it is eminently clear the real dynamic and driving factor underlying the politics of the of the Middle East is the tribal warfare between Shia and Sunni, which has been going on for 1400 years and which is likely go on indefinitely into the future, regardless of what the West thinks or does.

          • Pete

            The Kings of Egypt, Iraq, Jordan were more of a sham than the Mamluks of Egypt of the kings conquered by the ottomans in Libya and elsewhere?

            What right did the Mamluks or the ottoman have to rule?

          • Texas Patriot

            Why is it important which one was more of a sham, when they were all shams. The point is, that it’s really none of our business what they believe or what they do or how they choose to govern themselves. Unless they directly threaten our security, or the security of our traditional allies, i.e. France, Britain, Germany, Austria, Holland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan, and our new and emerging allies Russia, China, and Israel, there really shouldn’t be even the tiniest bit of concern with the politics of the region.

          • glpage

            Obama was elected because he is a rock star. His foreign policy efforts are continually on the wrong side of the interests of the US.

          • knowshistory

            no going back? our nation’s domestic enemies, the democratic and a large portion of the republican party, are already there. they don’t have to go back to where they have always been.

          • Texas Patriot

            They’re waking up like everyone else, some quicker than others, but they’re all waking up. Listen to some of Diane Feinstein’s speeches. You won’t hear anyone saying a lot about the wonderful qualities of Islam anymore. Those days are gone forever, and that’s major progress. Feinstein is talking about eliminating ISIS. What she probably doesn’t realize quite yet is that ISIS is playing precisely by the book that Muhammad and his followers wrote and have been playing by for the last 1400 years.

            The truth is that Obama reached out to moderate Muslims in the Cairo Speech for the purpose of gaining allies in our struggle against Islamic Jihad. All he got back was worldwide Muslim chants of “Obama, Obama, We’re All Osama” on 9/11/2012 while the rebels we assisted in overthrowing Gaddafi massacred our diplomats at Benghazi.

            No, there is no going back, not for Obama or anyone else. The moment for the so-called moderate Muslims to rise up against the radicals has come and gone.

          • knowshistory

            not gonna happen. “moderate” muslims are just muslims who agree with killing infidels, but do not wish to sacrifice, or risk, their lives doing it. when it becomes safer to execute infidels, they will all be in agreement, the so called “moderates” and the so called extremists. the “moderate” muslims riding to the rescue is a fool’s dream. there are plenty of fools.

          • Texas Patriot

            We all know that now, but many of us didn’t want to believe it for a long, long time. As for Obama, I haven’t given up on him.

          • nomoretraitors

            “George Bush made plenty of absurd and ridiculous speeches”
            Ok, but for all his faults Bush had the country’s best interests at heart, even if he sometimes went about it the wrong way.
            Obama, on the other hand, views America as an inherently evil and racist nation in need of “fundamental transformation” into a “social justice” paradise with wealth redistribution (aka welfare giveways) to the black underclass and illegal immigrants from Latin America, as well as appeasement of Islamic jihadists.

          • knowshistory

            you are absolutely right. what bush did due to incomprehensible stupidity and intentional, willful ignorance, Obama does due to a deep, abiding, and venomous hatred for the legal population of our nation.

          • knowshistory

            no. the west is not waking up. if it were, Obama, as well as the traitorous “leaders” of Europe would be in handcuffs, wearing orange, and answering for their crimes. genocide. treason. they are not, so the west is not waking up. let me know when Obama is in custody, charged with treason and genocide of the legal population of the nation he is sworn to protect, and then I will agree with you that the west is waking up.

      • kasandra

        Gotta disagree. He’s a lot worse than most Western leaders both because he’s worse personally (dishonest, dictatorial, etc.) and because he’s worse while he’s leading (er, ruining) the pivotal country in the Western alliance. So they’ve degraded their military and we’ve degraded our military. But what difference does it make if Belgium or Italy degrade their militaries (no offence Belgium and Italy but, face it, militarily you don’t contribute much in that regard). When we degrade our military, there’s no one behind us and it’s the end of the game.

  • Hi there

    Doesn’t Sweden have a really high suicide rate?
    As for me, when ideology and survival clash, I would rather survive.
    I would love to believe that peace is obtainable in Israel, but I’m not about to jump off the roof in order to prove anything.
    It would be nice if we could live harmoniously with our Arab cousins, but if every other day, an Arab with a car or knife goes on a pogrom, I support my grocery’s decision to get rid of their Arab workers.
    My life goes before my tolerance. I would feel bad about men being out of jobs, if I weren’t so scared for my life and that of my children.
    If the Swedes think it’s wise to pursue liberal values at their own expense, I care as much about that as I care about their suicide rate: Their choice, Thank God I don’t live there.
    We choose life.

    • http://swedishsurveyor.wordpress.com/ Messino

      If you take people from a culture with obligations and no freedoms to a culture that has freedoms and no obligations the dominant will prevail.

      Which in this case; is not the Swedes.

      Harsh? Meet our Minister of Justice.

      http://swedishsurveyor.com/2014/11/13/morgan-only-1-johansson/

    • knowshistory

      is 100% a high suicide rate? infidel swedes have chosen suicide. the rest of the world should pay attention. thanks to swedes, we will soon see, once again, the advantages of allowing muslims to take over your country. thanks for the example, swedes. I have lived in Minnesota. dumb is not an adjective there. it is part of the name for swedes. dumb swede. they are kidding, of course. swedes in Minnesota are good people, and outside of the incredibly anti-American and suicidal “twin cities” swedes are very good people, and not actually stupid. inside the “twin cities”, swedes are just as stupid and suicidal as the rest. in Sweden, swedes are caricatures of stupidity. drooling, illiterate, anhistoric, incompetent, suicidal, fools. just drooling, toothless, fools, who invited Islamic enemies to rule them. and by rule them, I mean genocide them.

  • http://ruleofreason.blogspot.com/ Edward Cline

    So, don’t send in ambulances or paramedical staff. If the barbarians get hurt, let them lay where they bleed. Let them bleed to death. But if the police want to go into these areas, they should go in armed to the teeth with orders to shoot to kill. And if the Muzzies reply in kind, send in the army, with orders to shoot to kill. Leave as many bodies and bloody skulls there as they wish. The Muzzies shouldn’t mind. It would be a form of “sudden Ashura.”

    • Swede_P

      I have to agree in principle, though you put it far more bluntly than I would. (That is to your credit). I live in Sweden, but in the countryside. I don’t have to contend with too much trouble from wild Arab jackasses, but rather with the loud roar of Russian bombers flying overhead nearly every day. Just today, it was so loud that I could not hear the radio. You see, as well as being completely careless in its immigration policy, the government of Sweden has woefully neglected national defense.

      • JayWye

        Swedish airspace is neutral airspace,no? That no foreign military may use unless it’s an emergency.
        Seems your Gripens -should- be forcing them out of Swedish airspace,forcing them to land and be interned,or shooting them down. You know,defending your airspace.

        • Swede_P

          You don’t have to convince me, JayWye. And in fairness, I should have mentioned that we often (but certainly not always) also hear the high-pitched sound of the Gripen tailing the Russian bombers. However, the Russians typically ignore them (the Swedish jets are unarmed) and they keep coming back. What is really scary is that I am actually becoming used to it!

      • knowshistory

        Sweden’s risk due to the Russians is negligible, compared to the certain genocide of the traditional Swedish population due to the hate filled treason of Sweden’s muslim loving, swede hating leaders. don’t worry about the Russians–they only kill some of the people they conquer. muslims kill them all. and Swedish traitors are inviting muslims to genocide the Swedish population. don’t worry about Russia. kill your treasonous, murderous hate filled criminal political “leaders”.

  • Bob Sten

    How is that “diversity” working out for you white people?

    Maybe you should be more like the japanese and koreans and keep foreigners out. Homogenous societies make for better societies.

  • Bob Sten

    Me thinks it’s time for some pogroms in sweden. Let the interlopers know you aren’t pleased swedes.

  • cxt

    Always considered that more or less as proof positive of ones mental state.

    When you reach the point where your bloodlust and barbarism leads you to think its a good idea to attack ambulances, EMT’s, Aid workers, etc.

    Without taking into consideration that you, yourself, or a family member or a loved one might NEED an ambulance, an EMT, or an Aid worker.

    Such acts say all you really need to know about the people involved.

  • johninohio1

    I imagine that the Muslim mentality says ‘The boundaries of my community are the boundaries of an Islamic state, and any’ foreigner’ who invades that state must be repelled or killed.’ Ultimately, the borders of Sweden will become the boundaries of their Islamic state, if left unopposed.

  • johninohio1

    The only way I can rationalize a people putting their nation and culture at risk is to conclude that they, or a significant portion of them, have become bored with everything about their nation and culture–Bored with their history, heroes, myths, beliefs, social mores, occupations, etc. There is no excitement in being a Swede anymore, or an American, perhaps. By being unwilling to defend the nation and it’s meaning, they implicitly give license to those who would tear it all down and create something ‘new’–hoping for something exciting.
    But it would take more than just boredom. It would also require adopting an unthinking faith, taking for granted, that everything good that they depend on, such as cheap, plentiful food, their home, freedom of movement and travel, leisure, etc., will be unaffected. Actually, a kind of insanity.

  • Daniel

    Here’s what a rational and psychologically healthy mayor of this town would do:
    Tell the Muslim community that if it attacks paramedics attempting to save other people’s lives(possibly Muslims)………a SWAT team will come into the area and blast any Muslim gangstas into the afterlife with irresistable firepower.
    THAT…….is the ONLY moral response to this atrocity. Not Kevlar vests.

    • knowshistory

      no. forget the paramedics. forget the swat team. declare that civilians who kill muslims will not ever be prosecuted, and muslims who are caught with arms, or who threaten or kill anyone, will be vigorously prosecuted that would put the country under attack by islam on a par with the way the law is treated in muslim countries, where any infidel with a weapon is severely punished, and actually resisting muslim aggression is unthinkable.

      • Daniel

        If you can get that into law……I’ll throw you a parade and name my grandchildren after you. In the meantime…….I’d be happy with a trigger happy SWAT team.