Tranny traitor Bradley Manning (currently calling himself Chelsea thanks to a prison sex change operation at taxpayer expense) has a plan for defeating ISIS.
Just let ISIS win. It’s a plan so brilliant that Putin must have thought of it for him.
I believe that Isis is fueled precisely by the operational and tactical successes of European and American military force that would be – and have been – used to defeat them… when the west fights fire with fire, we feed into a cycle of outrage, recruitment, organizing and even more fighting that goes back decades.
This bit of liberal foreign affairs wisdom would be slightly more credible if not for the minor fact that ISIS grew vastly in size and power when the United States failed to intervene.
ISIS didn’t profit from American tactical successes, but from an open field. I know that a guy who imagines that he’s a woman probably isn’t too in touch with reality, but even so he would have to be aware that the US withdrew from Iraq well before ISIS began its current rampage.
What is Bradley Manning’s plan? Glad you asked.
And avoiding direct action with Isis can be successful.
No it can’t. The last year demonstrated that.
Reality 2. Bradley Manning 0.
I believe that only a very focused and consistent strategy of containment can be effective in reducing the growth and effectiveness of Isis as a threat. And so far, Western states seem to have adopted that strategy. With very public humanitarian disasters, however, like the ones on Mount Sinjar and Irbil in northern Iraq, and the beheadings of journalists James Foley and Steven Sotloff, this discipline gets tested and can begin to fray.
This containment strategy allowed ISIS to approach Baghdad and Erbil, seize major Iraqi cities and form its own country.
Where exactly was ISIS being contained?
The tranny traitor suggests that instead of fighting ISIS we “counter its narrative” and “Set clear, temporary borders in the region”.
Then let ISIS set up its state and hope it loses credibility.
“Let Isis succeed in setting up a failed “state” – in a contained area and over a long enough period of time to prove itself unpopular and unable to govern. This might begin to discredit the leadership and ideology of Isis for good.”
It worked with the Nazis. It’s bound to work with Islam.
Notice Manning appears to have no real problem with the genocide that will result. But question from the audience, how exactly does he intend to set temporary borders for ISIS without using military force?
ISIS is expansionistic. Like Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan, it covers its costs and losses by expanding, seizing more wealth and gaining more recruits. How exactly does Manning intend to contain it without the use of force?
Eventually, if they are properly contained, I believe that Isis will not be able to sustain itself on rapid growth alone, and will begin to fracture internally. The organization will begin to disintegrate into several smaller, uncoordinated entities – ultimately failing in their objective of creating a strong state.
And if that doesn’t happen, Bradley Manning will owe all the dead people in the region a beer.
But let’s say it does happen. Then there are a dozen smaller Al Qaeda affiliates in control of parts of Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Syria and Saudi Arabia.
Meanwhile Manning is suing because his taxpayer funded wig isn’t blond enough.





















