Tranny Traitor Bradley Manning has a Plan for Letting ISIS Win

BradleyManning_2411026b

Tranny traitor Bradley Manning (currently calling himself Chelsea thanks to a prison sex change operation at taxpayer expense) has a plan for defeating ISIS.

Just let ISIS win. It’s a plan so brilliant that Putin must have thought of it for him.

I believe that Isis is fueled precisely by the operational and tactical successes of European and American military force that would be – and have been – used to defeat them…  when the west fights fire with fire, we feed into a cycle of outrage, recruitment, organizing and even more fighting that goes back decades.

This bit of liberal foreign affairs wisdom would be slightly more credible if not for the minor fact that ISIS grew vastly in size and power when the United States failed to intervene.

ISIS didn’t profit from American tactical successes, but from an open field. I know that a guy who imagines that he’s a woman probably isn’t too in touch with reality, but even so he would have to be aware that the US withdrew from Iraq well before ISIS began its current rampage.

What is Bradley Manning’s plan? Glad you asked.

And avoiding direct action with Isis can be successful.

No it can’t. The last year demonstrated that.

Reality 2. Bradley Manning 0.

I believe that only a very focused and consistent strategy of containment can be effective in reducing the growth and effectiveness of Isis as a threat. And so far, Western states seem to have adopted that strategy. With very public humanitarian disasters, however, like the ones on Mount Sinjar and Irbil in northern Iraq, and the beheadings of journalists James Foley and Steven Sotloff, this discipline gets tested and can begin to fray.

This containment strategy allowed ISIS to approach Baghdad and Erbil, seize major Iraqi cities and form its own country.

Where exactly was ISIS being contained?

The tranny traitor suggests that instead of fighting ISIS we “counter its narrative” and “Set clear, temporary borders in the region”.

Then let ISIS set up its state and hope it loses credibility.

“Let Isis succeed in setting up a failed “state” – in a contained area and over a long enough period of time to prove itself unpopular and unable to govern. This might begin to discredit the leadership and ideology of Isis for good.”

It worked with the Nazis. It’s bound to work with Islam.

Notice Manning appears to have no real problem with the genocide that will result. But question from the audience, how exactly does he intend to set temporary borders for ISIS without using military force?

ISIS is expansionistic. Like Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan, it covers its costs and losses by expanding, seizing more wealth and gaining more recruits. How exactly does Manning intend to contain it without the use of force?

Eventually, if they are properly contained, I believe that Isis will not be able to sustain itself on rapid growth alone, and will begin to fracture internally. The organization will begin to disintegrate into several smaller, uncoordinated entities – ultimately failing in their objective of creating a strong state.

And if that doesn’t happen, Bradley Manning will owe all the dead people in the region a beer.

But let’s say it does happen. Then there are a dozen smaller Al Qaeda affiliates in control of parts of Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Syria and Saudi Arabia.

Meanwhile Manning is suing because his taxpayer funded wig isn’t blond enough.

 

  • Pete

    “The organization will begin to disintegrate into several smaller, uncoordinated entities – ultimately failing in their objective of creating a strong state.”

    No brutal people send goon squads (or suicide bombers). They kill people, who want to split away. Other people seeing this stay in line.

    Case in point Al Nusrah split from ISIS. ISIS has now killed all the Al Nusrah leaders who dare not acknowledge ISIS suzerainty and taken over their fighters or the Al Nusrah leaders have voluntarily acknowledged ISIS suzerainty.

    Bradley Manning is just a beta boy, who was confused & thought life would be easier if he switched hit.

    • http://sultanknish.blogspot.com Daniel Greenfield

      Exactly.

      So far ISIS has dealt with its inevitable tendency to splinter through ruthless brutality. If any part of it does splinter it will be because it embraces a doctrine even more brutal and ruthless.

      Anyone can see why that would not exactly be a good thing for the region.

      You can only dissent from Islam to the right.

      • Raymond_in_DC

        Indeed, It was reported that several Westerners who’ joined ISIS but lost enthusiasm for battle decided they wanted to go home. ISIS executed them.

        • Biff Henderson

          That’s not quite right. First they tortured them and called them gutless wimps and then what you said, that icky thing with all that blood.

  • Conniption Fitz

    Gosh – Manning has as many demands as an imprisoned trannie traitor as a Muslim inmate at Guantanimo:
    http://www.bing.com/news/search?q=bradley+manning+wig+lawsuit&qft=sortbydate%3d%221%22&form=YFNR

    • http://sultanknish.blogspot.com Daniel Greenfield

      Maybe he can convert to Islam and demand a Burqa

    • Pete

      Don’t laugh. Bradley Manning might end up in Guantánamo. He certainly would have better accommodations than Leavenworth.

      This is Manning’s end state.

  • http://ruleofreason.blogspot.com/ Edward Cline

    I don’t know why you’re so hard on Tranny Chelsea, Daniel. I think he’s so brilliant he ought to write a movie script, say, a rewrite of “War of the Worlds,” in which the Martians aren’t killed by Earth germs, but man is wiped out by Martian germs, and that would constitute a victory for mankind, as the Martians sift through the rubble looking for survivors to kill. I’d even go so far as to encourage the White House to recruit him/her/it as a national security adviser, provided Obama first had installed bisexual restrooms in the West Wing. Better yet, send him to ISIS with Code Pink, wearing a blonde wig and a pleated skirt and high heels and carrying a sign saying, “No more violence1 We surrender! Stop fueling the cycle!!”

    • http://sultanknish.blogspot.com Daniel Greenfield

      He wouldn’t be Code Pink’s only man in a wig

      • http://ruleofreason.blogspot.com/ Edward Cline

        I believe you. But thanks for sparing us of a photograph of him/her/it.

  • Edgar Davidson

    Manning’s strategy is effectively the same strategy the world demands that Israel applies to Hamas, except that in the Hamas case the strategy also involves everybody funding Hamas so that the ‘failed state’ strategy doesn’t actually get to work completely. So, compared to that, Manning’s strategy for ISAIS is relatively rational.

  • De Doc

    Remind me again why we, the taxpayers, should fund this guy’s transition to womanhood?

    • Pete

      So he won’t reproduce by gene, but he will attempt to reproduce by meme like liberally college professors do.

    • Pete

      Actually, we could make this guy cry by sending him some Discover magazine articles. It would clear up his gender dysphonia real quick.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ Goon’s ND Redneck

    This kid should be doing hard time with no connection to the outside world.

  • kerrari1898

    “when the west fights fire with fire, we feed into a cycle of outrage, recruitment, organizing and even more fighting that goes back decades”

    Leftist – you seem fond of repeating this cliche to each other incessantly. But, like with most of your bleats of herd recognition, it’s entirely wrong. In fact, it’s the polar opposite of the truth.

    And it has been the polar opposite of the truth ever since Charles Martel decided to ‘fight fire with fire’ in 732.

    From the Battle of Tours, to the Battle of Akorinon 8 years later, to the sudden and permanent halting of the Ottoman’s sea campaigns after Lepanto, to the snuffing out of Barbary piracy in the early 19th century, to the abrupt ending of the Mahdist regime at Kerrari/Omdurman in 1898, what has always brought systemic Muslim plundering, slaving and conquest to a halt has been the decision of their victims to ‘fight fire with fire’, and hand their armies the thorough, comprehensive and usually long overdue ass-kicking which they so richly deserved.

    Aside from waiting for them to overstretch and run out of funds (a-la Mughal Empire in India), ‘fighting fire with fire’ has, historically, been the one and only thing that has ever quelled Islamic enthusiasm for conquest and atrocity.

    This claim is, to reiterate, completely, 180 degrees wrong. Wrong on a literally historic scale. And it has been so for at least the last 1282 years.

  • Bulan Sabriel

    This man is a traitor, not a hero. He threw a hissy fit and aided and
    abetted the enemy in time of war. We kept transexuals out of the
    military not just because they could be blackmailed but because gender
    dysphoria is a mental illness and mentally ill people cannot be trusted
    with our security

  • David

    I’ll give Spc. Manning this, S/he had the courage of his/her convictions. You’ve got lots of people who have penises calling themselves “women”. That’s kind of like somebody with an unpublished manuscript calling themselves an “author”.

  • worldwatchman

    Send him in wrapped in a thermal nuclear bomb. Get rid of two problems at once. Then, secretly go into Russia and get the other traitor. There’s always a bomb he can be wrapped in.

  • nigel cairns

    Daniel Greenfield is not a Shillman journalist-he is a shill

  • nigel cairns

    the Freedom Centre sounds like a bunch of Tea Party Nuts