UK PM: Six Planned ISIS Attacks in Europe

Jewish museum shooting footage

Let all the Jihadis return to the UK and it’ll be a lot more than six. There’s a reason countries have airports and it’s not just to humiliate tourists. (via Religion of Peace)

Speaking in Parliament, British Prime Minister David Cameron has revealed there have been at least six serious attacks planned against member states of the European Union by the self-declared Islamic State, reports The Express.

Making a statement to the house on his visit to the NATO conference, Cameron said: “The point I would make even today to the British people is: be in no doubt about the threat that so-called Islamic State poses to us. We have already seen something like six planned attacks in the countries of the European Union from [ISIS], including of course that appalling attack in the Brussels Jewish museum, where innocent people were killed. That flows directly from this organisation.”

Details are vague. The Brussels museum attack was actually carried out, but the attacker reportedly was planning another attack, so that may also be listed among the six. There was a recent alert in the UK which may have been a response to something.

The left will argue, as it did with the original Al Qaeda, that the organization is so nebulous that the attacks don’t really stem from it, despite the Caliphate, the Caliph and the pledges of allegiance.

The UK, for all its pandering, has fairly good intel. As with us, the intel hits blockages at the political and enforcement level. It does appear that there is a good deal of material in Europe that has yet to go public.

While bombing ISIS is a good way to degrade its total forces, the best way of preventing terrorist attacks is not to let their planners and perpetrators into the country.

  • Texas Patriot

    DG: While bombing ISIS is a good way to degrade its total forces, the best way of preventing terrorist attacks is not to let their planners and perpetrators into the country.

    And not only that. We need to make sure that the ones who are here now are denaturalized and deported to the Islamic State.

    • Biff Henderson

      denaturalized and deported

      I don’t see that happening as it violates the constitutional right that all be allowed to practice their religion as they see fit. The blind faith slaves of the Death Cult parade out the you have your religion I have mine Meccan spin and its all Kumbaya. It’ll be the same old slice and dice, obfuscate motivation and the prison da’wa road map for “managing” the misunderstanders of the ROP.

      • Texas Patriot

        BH: I don’t see that happening as it violates the constitutional right that all be allowed to practice their religion as they see fit.

        It’s an interesting question whether the teaching of a religion calling for mass executions, sexual slavery, and beheadings of non-Muslims should permitted as a matter of Freedom of Religion. I’m not aware that any such argument has ever been made in a Court of the United States. Perhaps it will be.

        • Biff Henderson

          The defense would be the Reza Aslan all dogma is putty in the hands the believer cr^p and you can’t persecute…blah-blah, cased closed.

          • Texas Patriot

            It would be an interesting case, and a lot would depend on how it was submitted to the jury. Consider this:

            Based on the teachings and life example of Muhammad and his followers and the way Islam has been practiced from its inception up to and including today, do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that the teaching and/or practice of Islam presents a proximate risk of physical harm to non-Muslims?

          • Biff Henderson

            My grandmother “hosted” a Japanese American as a house servant during WWII. It was a step up from the internment camps. Given this country’s past the Multi-Culties would never stand for any group being persecuted for what a “small minority” may be capable of. The country would stand in ruin before the machinations of law fare exhausted itself.

          • Texas Patriot

            It doesn’t have anything to do with persecuting or discriminating against anyone. What it has to do with is a frank evaluation and assessment of whether a risk of physical harm to non-Muslims is likely to be created by, or result from, the teaching and/or practice of Islam. Let’s face it. After listening to all the evidence and considering the entire history of the matter very carefully, even most Muslims would probably answer that question with an emphatic “Yes!” and throw in an enthusiastic “Allahu Akbar” for good measure.

          • Biff Henderson

            NAMBA openly advocates rescinding pedophilia statues and profess their desire to sodomize young boys. These progressives are not in jail for the same reason Imams that “reflect” on the merits of jihad are free to spew their poison. Americans don’t have the luxury of keeping the puppy in the cage. No matter how many times it pees on the carpet and evidence proves time and again if cannot be housebroken liberals believe all creatures can be redeemed.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        I don’t see that happening as it violates the constitutional right that all be allowed to practice their religion as they see fit.

        If all the verses of the Koran that once made Islam a religion, per the doctrine of abrogation, which is universally accepted by all Muslims throughout the Islamic totalitarian world, have been abrogated, that is superseded and replaced, by the infamous sword verses of the Koran they conflict with and in which also obligates all Muslims in the world to wage jihad against all infidels in the world until such time as Islam and its followers have been made supreme throughout the world, then how do you still consider Islam to be a so-called religion?

        Indeed, does see fit also include waging jihad as they see fit per their fundamental holy obligation to wage jihad against all infidels?

        • Biff Henderson

          Abrogate, to be forgotten. In Islam what is forgotten can always be resurrected if circumstance dictate this action furthers the goals of the Umma. As I have stated in another post – dogma is putty in the hands of the believer and fronting the Meccan spin garners a free ride. Throw maruna in the mix and we’re at a loss as CAIR and those b^stards hold all the cards in the law fare deck.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Actually, I think you need to go study the doctrine of abrogation a little more, as you are obviously unfamiliar with it. Especially because none of the verses of the Koran that actually made Islam a religion at one time are in force anymore.

            Now, Muslims are very good at citing those verses of the Koran to dupe gullible useful idiot infidels into believing that Islam is somehow a so-called religion of peace, but nonetheless those Muslims are just practicing taqiyya via stealth and deceptive jihad to protect the ummah and the ummah’s stealth jihad.

            Nonetheless, Islam is not a religion but a very draconian form of totalitarianism and if you study Islam in depth like I have, I think you will agree with me that it should be outlawed and banned ASAP.

          • Biff Henderson

            I am sad to say I cannot provide a link to a treatment on abrogation by a scholar of the Death Cult that surmised that any tool in Islam’s chest is never pitched and that what was forgotten does not negate it’s value in deceiving the kuffur under a given set of circumstances.

            I’m in the outlawed and banned camp yet I have not seen a proposal that would pass a constitutional challenge.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Why can you just accept fact and be done with it? It isn’t that hard to do. Nevertheless, if you believe you can somehow prove me wrong on this, then by all means please try, but you will inevitably fail.

          • Biff Henderson

            “Actually, I think you need to go study…if you believe you can somehow prove me wrong on this, then by all means please try, but you will inevitably fail.”

            Geez, What was the trigger that you felt the need to devolve discourse into a pissing contest? I showed respect for your opinion and your response was condescending histrionics that showcased your arrogance. Sadly, it’s probably your style. Really poor form.

            Apologists for MadMo spin their web of lies.

            http://www.free-minds.org/abrogation

            The following is a cut and paste from my notes on abrogation:

            There are no abrogated verses or verses that abrogate other verses, but to each verse is a condition and a time to use it … one is used in a time of weakness and the other in time of strength, so on and so forth. Verses that call for peace, forgiveness, sparing the unbelievers and things that the interpreters say were abrogated by the Verse of the Sword. But the truth I say is that such verses have their time and place; the Verse of the Sword has its time and its place.

            Qaradawi mentions another definition called “Al-Munsa”
            (forgotten verses) in which he quotes the Qur’an:

            None of Our revelations do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, but We substitutes omething better or similar: Knowest thou not that Allah Hath power over all
            things?

            The term “forgotten” is not meant to be abrogation; it is meant to be literally forgotten, out of memory temporarily until the time is right. Qaradawi strengthens this view by quoting Al-Syuti, one of Islam’s greatest sources of jurisprudence:

            Abrogation occurs at different levels. We have the first, the second and the third; that is a verse has a purpose, then the purpose is finished such as in being weak and few in number, to have peace and forgiveness with the enemy then is abrogated by the commands of war. This is not abrogation, but under the section of forgotten verses as Allah said ‘we made forgotten’ what is forgotten here is the order to fight, until the Muslims are
            strong, while they are weak the ruling is to be patient.

            By the way, at no point in my post did I try to discredit
            Naskh’s place in Qur’anic exegesis.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            What was the trigger that you felt the need to devolve discourse into a pissing contest?

            Once it became apparent that you are an ignoramus of major proportions not worth my time, I lost all patience with you. Hence, drop dead.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            By the way, abrogate means cancelled out, i.e., superseded and replaced. Or to be forgotten since they have been abrogated and are no long in force.

    • ObamaYoMoma

      Why not all Muslims deported? Because you naively believe that most of them are so-called moderate Muslims instead of intentionally non-violent stealth and deceptive jihadists?

  • SaraBest

    A lot of peaple buy this usefull machine Laptop+tablet 2-in-1

    Tablet when you want it. Laptop when you need it.

    ASUS Transformer Book T100TA-H1-GR 10.1″”

    Detachable 2-in-1 Touchscreen Laptop, 32GB+500GB (Grey)

    http://goo.gl/oyvbF8

  • ObamaYoMoma

    The UK, for all its pandering, has fairly good intel. As with us, the intel hits blockages at the political and enforcement level. It does appear that there is a good deal of material in Europe that has yet to go public.

    About as good as ours, which despite massive expansion post 9/11 has not managed to stop one violent jihad attack until after it has already manifested yet. Meanwhile, let’s make the public believe that we are protecting them by aimlessly chasing hydra-headed jihadists in the deserts of Iraq, instead of going after the ideology that drives jihad.

    While bombing ISIS is a good way to degrade its total forces, the best way of preventing terrorist attacks is not to let their planners and perpetrators into the country.

    Who’s their? ISIS. Yeah right. How about not letting Muslims in period and then banning and reversing mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage ASAP because it is really by design non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad that represents an exponentially far greater threat for the infidel world at large relative to all the violent jihadists in Iraq combined.

  • Pete

    “There’s a reason countries have airports and it’s not just to humiliate tourists.”

    I do not know if any of this is borrowed or from years of reading or writing. I don’t know if you are quick enough in your feet, but I think you could do comedy and do it well.

    This stories and other like it can appear here and several other blogs and news outlets. Some people seem especially hurt that these stories appear at FPM.

    Maybe it is the wit that shows in stark relief what a lie so much of what the Left believes.

  • Moa

    The only way to win is to discredit the enemy threat doctrine. Islam must be discredited. That is done by telling the TRUTH about Islam and Mohammed.

    Killing jihadis is necessary but not sufficient for winning. We MUST discredit Islam. If we don’t do that then there will be a never-ending stream of jihadis, until we run out of money.

    • BornFree50s

      Bingo. Appeasing and pandering never works against fascists or any ideologues. They feed on that. Direct, honest, courageous frontal assault is what works. Islamic numbers in the world, do not exist because they showed love.