Vanity Fair’s Anna Lekas Miller Says All Arabs are Terrorists

...from RT shrieker to Vanity Fair

…from Putin shrieker to Vanity Fair

Sometimes a lying leftist lies so much that she ends pushing all the way through her original politics all the way to the other side.

That’s what happened to Anna Lekas Miller at Vanity Fair where she dishonestly smeared Israelis as a bunch of raving sociopaths. And all she had to do was tell a bunch of lies.

“A Facebook page calling for Israeli vigilantes to “kill an Arab every hour” quickly gained more than 20,000 likes,” she wrote.

Except that’s not what the Facebook page said.

“We support executing a terrorist every hour until the teens are released,” the page said.

Vanity Fair, whose journalistic standards hover somewhere between the Huffington Post and the New York Times then issued a correction.

“A Facebook page calling for Israeli vigilantes to “shoot a terrorist every hour” quickly gained more than 20,000 likes,” the correction read.

The Facebook page made no mention of vigilantes shooting anyone, but Vanity Fair was finally in the same general neighborhood as reality.

How did VF explain this unfortunate error? By claiming that all Arabs are terrorists.

Update: An earlier version of this story translated a Hebrew phrase to mean “kill an Arab every hour”. The literal translation is “shoot a terrorist every hour.”

Really?

Does Vanity Fair believe that terrorist can be translated, even loosely, as Arab?

The Facebook page states “terrorist” in English. The Hebrew word is “Mehabel”. In no way, shape or form does Mehabel translate as Arab.

However Anna Lekas Miller and Vanity Fair seem to think it does. Maybe they should explain their theory that all Arabs are terrorists.

  • Cyborg3K

    Its that old saying about broken clocks. They are still correct once in a while.

  • Pete

    Google translate has the following poor translation. It is however better than Anna Lekas Miller and Vanity Fair supposed translation.

    facebook.com/lehaselmehabel/info

    translate.google.com/

    Public protest page reader to execute any time a terrorist – to release the abducted boys

    Description

    Front of murderous terrorism and violent, should be treated aggressively. The weakness of the Israeli government releasing a thousand murderers set free among them increased appetite and led to the abduction of boys. The way for the return of the boys is to intimidate the enemy and make him understand that he has nothing to lose. We support the killing of a terrorist in every hour to release

    • Daniel Greenfield

      the word used is Mehabel or Terrorist

      • Pete

        I am not disputing your translation. I believed what you said about the translation the word Mehabel before I used google translate or went to the linked Facebook page.

        I would be willing to bet someone $1,000 that you speak, read & write Hebrew well. I do not.

        My point with my post is that getting something close to a proper translation was easy, Anna Lekas Miller lied, and Vanity Fair lied.

        • Daniel Greenfield

          yes it was, especially since the English was right there

          VF’s correction is especially bizarre since they’re insisting that terrorism can be translated as Arab

  • ObamaYoMoma

    By claiming that all Arabs are terrorists.

    Vanity Fair would be absolutely correct if it had said instead that all Muslims are jihadists.

    Does Vanity Fair believe that terrorist can be translated, even loosely, as Arab?

    It’s far more likely for an Arab to be a terrorists as opposed to a Muslim, since there are various Arab groups such as Christian Arabs, Druze Arabs, Yazidi Arabs, etc. Meanwhile, a Muslim Arab, on the other hand, would have to be a blasphemous apostate to become a terrorist and, of course, that means he or she would be executed according to the dictates of Islam, as apostasy and blasphemy in Islam are capital offenses.

    Maybe they should explain their theory that all Arabs are terrorists.

    Well, of course, not all Arabs are terrorists. However, all Muslims are jihadists in one form or another, either violent or non-violent. Otherwise, they are executed for apostasy and blasphemy according to the dictates of Islam.

    As Islam far more than anything else is an extremely rabid form of totalitarianism that seeks to make itself supreme as opposed to being just a so-called religion. Thus, exactly like the old Communist Soviet Union sent non-conformers to the Soviet Gulags, all Muslims that don’t adhere to the dictates of Islam are executed for apostasy and blasphemy.

    • Laura Runyan

      You are grossly misrepresenting Islam. Yes, fundamentalists can be found in Islam–just as they can be in Judaism and Christianity. Please become better informed before you make such sweeping generalizations about 1.6 billion of this planet’s inhabitants.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        ROFL! Indeed, the above is utterly hilarious. You ought to be a comedienne, because you sure in the heck are very funny.

        By the way, I hate to rain on your incredibly naïve idiotic parade, but Islam, more than anything else, is a very draconian form of totalitarianism that seeks world domination, as opposed to being just a so-called religion. Thus, just like in the old Communist Soviet Union where all non-conformers were routinely sent to the Soviet gulags, all non-conformers in Islamic totalitarian society are summarily executed for apostasy and blasphemy per the dictates of Islam.

        Indeed, that means that since waging jihad in one form or another, either violently or non-violently, which is a holy war waged by ALL MUSLIMS against ALL INFIDELS in the cause of Allah to ultimately make Islam and Islamic totalitarian society supreme throughout the world, is a fundamental holy obligation incumbent upon all Muslims, all mainstream orthodox Muslims in the world, as opposed to just a few fundamentalists, radicals, extremists, and assorted Islamists here and there perpetrating terrorism randomly, are jihadists in one form or another, either violent or non-violent. Otherwise, they are summarily executed for apostasy and blasphemy per the dictates of Islam.

        Thus, rather than me being the one who is grossly misrepresenting Islam, I’m afraid it is you who is grossly misrepresenting Islam, as you don’t have the first fricking clue. Heck, you even equate Islam like a loon with Judaism and Christianity, which is utterly, utterly absurd, not to mention extremely insulting for those two faith-based religions.

        I mean, damn, I would not consider a so-called religion that executes all apostates and all blasphemers and that also requires all Muslims to totally, completely, and unconditionally submit to the “will of Allah”, which in essence is Sharia (Islamic totalitarian law), under the penalties of death for apostasy and blasphemy, a religion.

        Not to mention, I also would not consider a so-called religion that has as its sole fundamental purpose the subjugation of all infidels and all religions into Islamic totalitarianism, i.e., harsh and debilitating dhimmitude, through both violent and non-violent jihad and the eventual imposition of Sharia, which is Islamic totalitarian law, to ultimately make Islam and Islamic totalitarian society supreme throughout the world to be a religion either. But, of course, thankfully, I’m not you. Thank you and have a blessed day.

        • Laura Runyan

          Sorry, but if the best you can do is sarcasm and name-calling, I’m not going to waste much more of my time on you. Why don’t you try making an ARGUMENT in place of juvenile attacks? I wrote a lengthy book chapter about misconceptions regarding Islam and Muslims, so I know quite well that it’s actually YOUR view that’s the naive one. How many Muslims do you actually know well? Few, I’m guessing, or you wouldn’t have such a narrow minded and bigoted view of such a large population of people. I suggest you read some fair-minded sources of information and stay away from the right-wing blogs and other forms of propaganda. No decent university course in philosophy or Western civilization or history would accept your “argument” above–nor should should it. Your snarky attitude is common on the Internet these days, but it does nothing to further the discussion or shed light on the topic at hand. If you want to try communicating as an adult, I’ll listen, but I won’t respond to rude and self-satisfied comments that are full of bias and inaccuracies.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Sorry, but if the best you can do is sarcasm and name-calling, I’m not going to waste much more of my time on you.

            First of all, what you label as sarcasm is the truth. Not to mention I could care less whether you waste time on me or what. You’re not special! You obviously have a vacuum sealed closed mind. Which also sort of reveals how someone like you can still be so oblivious about what Islam actually is to this day, and which I find to be remarkable, by the way.

            I wrote a lengthy book chapter about misconceptions regarding Islam and Muslims,

            Pretty please provide me a link to it so I can more than debunk everything you wrote. It would be a great pleasure, I assure you.

            so I know quite well that it’s actually YOUR view that’s the naive one.

            Yeah right, of course, you do and also I bet your dog barks louder than mine too. Give me a fricking break. How so juvenile.

            How many Muslims do you actually know well? Few, I’m guessing, or you wouldn’t have such a narrow minded and bigoted view of such a large population of people

            Here we go again: Oh boy, it’s the classic leftwing reprise. You guys are all preprogrammed like mind numbed robots. Indeed, all you delusional leftists have numerous Muslim friends and buddies that you all hang out with. Yeah, you guys all hang out together and sing kumbayah.

            While I have had to deal with Muslims, I don’t know any them. You know why? Because it is blasphemous for Muslims to become friends with infidels like me and you, and blasphemy in Islam, at least the last time I checked, is a capital offense.

            Hence, you also obviously don’t actually know any Muslims well either. Not to mention that they will only attempt to deceive you, in any event. Which in your case, would be exceedingly easy for them to do since you are so incredibly oblivious. Indeed, all they would have to do is show you a few peaceful Meccan verses of the Koran that have all been abrogated and before you know it you’d be singing kumbayah with them again while eating out their hands.

            Furthermore, my view can only be considered to be bigoted if it is false, which would also mean, by the way, that I am intentionally inciting hatred and violence towards Muslims. However, unlike you I can more than prove everything I say is true. Meanwhile, you can’t prove a single thing you say is true. Not a single thing.

            I suggest you read some fair-minded sources of information and stay away from the right-wing blogs and other forms of propaganda.

            Yeah…propaganda. Figures. And I suggest you go buy a brain!

            By the way, is this right wing propaganda? It’s a passage directly from The Noble Koran published in Saudi Arabia by the King Fahd Complex for the Printing of the Holy Qur’an, Madinah, K.S.A.

            “Al-Jihad (holy fighting) in Allah’s Cause (with full force of numbers and weaponry) is given the utmost importance in Islam and is one of its pillars (on which it stands). Allah’s Word is made superior, (His Word being Lailaha illallah which means none has the right to be worshipped but Allah), and His Religion (Islam) is propagated. By abandoning Jihad (may Allah protect us from that) Islam is destroyed and the Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honour is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim, and he who tries to escape from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart wish to fulfil this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite.”
            I know, I know, more right wing garbage.
            No decent university course in philosophy or Western civilization or history would accept your “argument” above–nor should should it.

            I know…and that gives me a warm and fuzzy feeling all over. If you want to talk about propaganda, the sort of philosophy, Western civilization, and history that is taught in our colleges and universities today, is propaganda, piss poor propaganda at that. Today’s college kids don’t receive an education, they receive an indoctrination that turns them into mentally incompetent basket cases.

            Your snarky attitude is common on the Internet these days, but it does nothing to further the discussion or shed light on the topic at hand.

            Oh sure, my attitude is snarky, meanwhile Ms. Goody Two-Shoes here, with her air of superiority and arrogant sophistication is lecturing me as if she is somehow an authority on the subject of Islam, when it couldn’t be any more obvious that she is a complete and utter neophyte and a legend in her own mind.

            Like I said, please post a link to the chapter you said you wrote apologizing for Islam, while condemning anyone and everyone with the courage to sound the alarm as somehow being an Islamophobe. Especially when its ex-Muslim apostates that were fortunate enough to escape execution with their life and that are now living in the West, while having their lives threatened on a daily basis for having the courage speak out.

            Yeah…it takes a lot of courage to write a chapter like that when you don’t have the first fricking clue about what you are talking about. All you political correct Marxist totalitarian leftists seek to limit and censure the freedom of speech, especially when you can’t control it. Indeed, as is typical, your moral universe has been inverted, as the truth has now become hate speech and hate speech has now become the truth.

            If you want to try communicating as an adult, I’ll listen, but I won’t respond to rude and self-satisfied comments that are full of bias and inaccuracies.

            Lady, if anyone has a snarky attitude go look in the mirror. Like I said, unlike you I can more that backup everything I say on this website or any other website with full documentation. You may consider me to be a bigot, especially because you are more than just a little ignorant of the topic at hand, but I could care less what an unhinged loon like you thinks about me. Indeed, you’re full of yourself aren’t you?

            By the way, it was you who demonstrated that you are a bigot in your very first post in response to me, as you denigrated both Jews and Christians with your absurd comment, and sorry ignorance isn’t an excuse.

          • Laura Runyan

            I’m not reading any more of your replies. It’s already clear to me that it is impossible for me to have an reasonable exchange with you–though I’ve been able to do so with a number of Jews, Muslims, Christians, faculty members, undergraduate students I taught, and MODERATE Republicans. I’ll trust their judgment over yours. As I said, I won’t waste my time on intemperate comments. I posted a couple of items for others who MIGHT be more open-minded than you, but I won’t engage with someone who expresses such black-and-white and absolutist views. There’d be no point in it, and I’d rather have a thoughtful conversation with someone who’s not a blatant bigot.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            I’m not reading any more of your replies.

            Oh my God, the world has now come to an end. What am I going to do from here on out? I can’t believe it. Shucks!

            It’s already clear to me that it is impossible for me to have an reasonable exchange with you–though I’ve been able to do so with a number of Jews, Muslims, Christians, faculty members, undergraduate students I taught, and MODERATE Republicans.

            Lady, you are full of yourself. Moreover, you don’t teach, you inculcate, pollute, and contaminate minds. Let’s be honest for once! Get over yourself. You arrogantly pretend to be condescendingly superior, but you are just a buffoon, a mentally handicapped buffoon,

            I’ll trust their judgment over yours

            Like who cares?

            As I said, I won’t waste my time on intemperate comments.

            Meanwhile, your comments aren’t? Apparently, your crap doesn’t stink to high heaven, just everyone else’s does. Go ahead and believe that you moonbat.

            I posted a couple of items for others who MIGHT be more open-minded than you, but I won’t engage with someone who expresses such black-and-white and absolutist views.

            Good, I’ll have more fun demonstrating what a buffoon you are.

            Meanwhile, the only one who is a bigot here is you. Indeed, read your asinine comment in your very first post. It proves it.

            Of course, to you all religions and their adherents are beneath you because you are far more sophisticated than those dolts. Yeah right…a legend in her own unhinged mind. Anyway, you are exceedingly boring to say the least. I’m glad you won’t respond to me anymore.

          • Laura Runyan

            Please do NOT bother me anymore. You’re starting to come across as obsessive. No discussion with you is going to be productive, so please just leave me in peace.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Go fly a kite lady!

        • Laura Runyan

          I have repeatedly said that I won’t engage in a discussion with someone who is uninterested in actual evidence. As sources, I have presented studies covered in a center-left JEWISH newspaper and a study done by a JEWISH UNIVERSITY in JERUSALEM. Early on, you presented nothing more than your simple-minded and rabidly extremist opinions, which is why I began deleting your comments unread. I will not waste my time arguing with a bigot who paints all Muslims (or any other group of people) with a broad brush that falsely depicts them as our enemy; you’re too angry and irrational to have a more measured and nuanced conversation on the subject–at least with me or anyone I personally know–so it’s well past time for you to try to find someone who does NOT care about evidence or a thoughtful consideration of relevant facts. I won’t discuss Israeli politics with someone who apparently knows little about the political situation in Israel and the settlements.

          For anyone who might be interested in a Jewish perspective that differs from that of the woman above (I have no idea whether she’s Jewish or not, but it’s clear that she hates Muslims in general) or “voracious_one,” here is a detailed article written by David Remnick, editor of the New Yorker. Reminick is Jewish (he was raised as a secular Jew), and he’s extremely well informed about the political climate in Israel. (He’s also well informed about Russia, where he lived for a time, and he’s fluent in the Russian language.)

          Fortunately, the far right Zionists he profiles in this piece did NOT do well in the Israeli election that came several weeks after the article was published.

          http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/01/21/130121fa_fact_remnick?currentPage=all

          • ObamaYoMoma

            I have repeatedly said that I won’t engage in a discussion with someone who is uninterested in actual evidence.

            Who cares! Evidence is like cred in that you wouldn’t know actual evidence even if it stared you in the face and spit in your eye. Indeed, you are one of the most clueless bimbos I have ever run across on the Internet, and that’s saying a lot because I’ve run into some pretty clueless people in my time. Not to mention that you also believe that you are God’s gift to all knowledge, yet you are oblivious. Indeed, you have bought into the mental disease known as leftism 110 percent, and as a result your mind has been decimated.

            As sources, I have presented studies covered in a center-left JEWISH newspaper and a study done by a JEWISH UNIVERSITY in JERUSALEM.

            You never once presented facts and evidence. Instead, you just presented leftwing opinion. Get over yourself! And no….Harretz is about as far to the left as it gets.

            I presented a passage direct from the Koran and which also happens to come from the most widely distributed Koran in the entire world, which demonstrates in black and white that waging jihad is not only a fundamental holy obligation incumbent upon all Muslims, but that also indicates that waging jihad is one of the pillars of Islam as well.

            Then I presented you a recent poll of so-called Palestinians commissioned by the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, which is a Washington DC based think tank whose scholars, such as Ambassador Dennis Ross, served as former President Bill Clinton’s lead negotiator in the Palestinian Peace talks that took place during Clinton’s final term in office and that like clockwork inevitably failed. In any event, that poll proves that 64 percent of so-called Palestinians say that after a peace deal is signed with Israel, “resistance should continue until all of historic Palestine is liberated.” And 65% say that the Palestinian Arab leadership agrees; that any negotiated solution “would be part of a ‘program of stages,’ to liberate all of historic Palestine later.”

            “This is about as explicit as can be. The conventional wisdom that a majority of Palestinian Arabs want a permanent peace with Israel is a baseless myth. It is based on flawed surveys which do not list the alternative of an Arab-only state from the river to the sea.”

            Early on, you presented nothing more than your simple-minded and rabidly extremist opinions,

            Extremist opinion according to you: a radical unhinged leftwing loon.

            I will not waste my time arguing with a bigot who paints all Muslims (or any other group of people) with a broad brush that falsely depicts them as our enemy; you’re too angry and irrational to have a more measured and nuanced conversation on the subject–at least with me or anyone I personally know–so it’s well past time for you to try to find someone who does NOT care about evidence or a tho ughtful consideration of relevant facts.

            Oh my, it’s the classic broad brush scenario once again. If anyone is a bigot, it is you lady. First, you vilified and demonized Christians and Jews by morally equating Christianity and Judaism with Islam, which is not even remotely true and which also indicates that you don’t have the first fricking clue about what Islam actually is. Thus, in one fell swoop, since ignorance is no excuse, you insulted every religious Christian and Jew on the planet, and if that isn’t bigoted then nothing is!

            Next, you tried to vilify and demonize orthodox Jewish males for having the audacity to strictly adhere to the tenets of their religion, in defiance of women libbers who are trying to force them to compromise those religious tenets, in order to suggest that Judaism is somehow an evil religion and to cast aspersions on Jews in another idiotic attempt to vilify and demonize Israel and, hence, at the same time incite hatred and violence towards Jews and the Jewish state of Israel.

            All the while, like the bigoted hypocrite you are you totally ignore the reality that practically all Muslim females are sexually mutilated via female genital circumcision, are sold into child sexual slavery, i.e., marriage to men old enough to be their grandfathers with most of them being below the age of puberty, are stoned to death for being raped or for having an affair, have to tolerate marriages with men who are also married to multiple wives, are beaten on a regular basis by their husbands, can’t even leave their home unless they are accompanied by a close male relative, can’t drive a car or even have a job, have to wear hijabs and other Islamic head covering and garb, etc., etc., etc. ad nauseum. How can you be so blind? Apparently, you must believe that Muslim females are the most liberated women on the planet. Like I said lady, you live in a very delusional dream world.

            Yet, you have the audacity to suggest that I’m a bigoted Islamophobe for having the audacity to expose the truth about Islam. Meanwhile, you can’t back up a single thing you claim, while I, on the other hand, can more than back up everything I say.

            Moreover, I depict them as our enemy because they are our enemy. As a matter of fact, the sole fundamental purpose of mainstream orthodox Islam, (which is the only kind, by the way), is to subjugate all infidels and all religions through both violent and non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad (holy war) and the eventual imposition of Sharia, which is Islamic totalitarian law, to ultimately make Islam and the Islamic totalitarian world supreme above all others throughout the world.

            Indeed, take off your blinders and take a close hard look around the world for yourself, wherever the Islamic totalitarian world borders the infidel world and beyond we see jihad (holy war) being waged against the infidels all around the world either violently or non-violently and through stealth and deception in places like India, Thailand, Myanmar, Philippines, Malaysia, China, Indonesia, Chechnya, the Balkans, Kosovo, Israel, Sudan, Somalia, Kenya, Nigeria, throughout Europe, America, South and Central America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, throughout the Islamic totalitarian world, etc., etc., etc. ad nauseum

            In addition, there isn’t one legit democracy anywhere in the Islamic totalitarian world. Why? Because democracy consist of laws that emanate from mere mortal man, while Islamic totalitarian law, i.e., Sharia, on the other hand, is divine because it emanates directly from Allah (God). Indeed, it’s his will and as such it is absolutely flawless and perfectly just. Meanwhile, all laws that emanate from mere mortal man are abominations that according to Sharia must be obliterated by Islam

            Yet, you are somehow still naive enough to believe that the so-called Palestinians are willing to make peace with the infidels in Israel, while at the same time all Muslims throughout the world are waging jihad both violently and non-violently against all infidels and all infidel states in the world to ultimately make Islam and Islamic totalitarian society supreme above all others.

            I bet you consider Hamas to be radical Muslims that are reacting to harsh Israeli policies like a loon. However, the jihadists that comprise Hamas are no more or no less radical than the millions of Muslims that have migrated to America for the nefarious purposes of mass Muslim infiltration of our society and for eventual demographic conquest, and in which is a form of non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad.

            Indeed, mass Muslim immigration to the infidel world with all of its excess baggage in reality is stealth and deceptive jihad, as Muslim immigrants never ever assimilate and integrate in infidel societies, as that would require them to become infidels, which is a capital offense in Islam. Thus, they first form Muslim enclaves that in time morph into Muslim no-go zones ruled by Sharia and that are in effect tiny Islamic statelets within the larger host infidel states. In these Muslims no-go zones, state and local police, fire departments, and ambulance services dare not go because they will be attacked. As a matter of fact, the government of France counted in excess of 700 Muslin no-go zones in France alone a few years ago.

            Now the Islamic totalitarian world relative to the infidel world is an economic basket case and as such can never hope to defeat us via military force alone. However, through mass Muslim infiltration of our societies and eventual demographic conquest, the Islamic totalitarian world most certainly can defeat us. As a matter of fact, unless something very drastic happens in the near term, several Euroloon countries in Europe will become Muslim majority countries in the second half of this century thanks to mass Muslim infiltration of their societies and strategic demographic conquest, both forms of non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad.

            Indeed, like I said, Muslims throughout the world are waging jihad against all infidels throughout the world, including against you. Only you are too inculcated into leftism and thus too mentally handicapped as a result to even realize it. Gee it really sucks to be you.

            I won’t discuss Israeli politics with someone who apparently knows little about the political situation in Israel and the settlements.

            Again, lady, the conflict is not a conflict between Arabs and Jews over land Israel is alleged to have stolen and in which it somehow illegally now occupies, which is utterly absurd. Instead, it’s an old fashion run of the mill jihad waged against the infidels in Israel by the Islamic totalitarian world through their proxy – the so-called Palestinians, and as such it is just a tiny part of the much greater global jihad at large the Islamic totalitarian world is also waging against all infidels, (including you), and all infidel states throughout the world to ultimately make Islam and, hence, Islamic totalitarian society supreme throughout the world. So stick the notion that Israeli settlements on Israeli land are somehow illegal in your ear you moonbat! Indeed, you are the classic gullible useful idiot infidel, the kind that slick Muslim taqiyya artist specifically seek out, since you are so easy to dupe.

            here is a detailed article written by David Remnick, editor of the New Yorker.

            Of course, if it is not from a hard left site, then according to you its propaganda. Yet, you have the audacity to say that we are the ones that have a closed mind. Open up your eyes lady and look around the world for yourself. If you can’t see how Muslim females are abused throughout the Islamic totalitarian world and now also in many parts of the infidel world thanks to mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage that is really non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad for the nefarious purposes of mass Muslim infiltration of our societies and for eventual demographic conquest, then you are blind. If you can’t see how Christians, Jews, Hindus, and Buddhists are being massacred in genocides and ethnically cleansed throughout the Islamic totalitarian world, then you are blind. Open up your mind, don’t read anything. Look for yourself. It’s there and it’s not difficult to see. All you have to do is open up your eyes and your mind. You may learn something. Indeed, you don’t have to be a rocket scientist to figure it out. All you have to do is open up your eyes and take a close look for yourself.

            Reminick is Jewish (he was raised as a secular Jew), and he’s extremely well informed about the political climate in Israel.

            Reminick is like you. He’s a self-hating leftwing moonbat! Thus, he is mentally deficient.

            Fortunately, the far right Zionists he profiles in this piece did NOT do well in the Israeli election that came several weeks after the article was published.

            You are an inculcated loon and a partisan moonbat. By the way, you are also a glutton for punishment. Indeed, I believe you are a sadomasochist that enjoys pain and humiliation. Sucks to be you!

          • Laura Runyan

            Through your crazed and obsessive refusal to leave me alone, you have presented yourself to be one of the most unstable and nasty personalities I’ve encountered online–which is saying a LOT. I’ve sent a link to this page to several people whose judgment I respect, and every one of them has had the same response to your bizarre and badly reasoned “arguments.”

            Again, your comment was deleted unread. I have the good fortune of being able to discuss topics such as this one with thoughtful people who understand the political and ethical nuances involved, so I refuse to waste my energy on simple-minded extremists like you.

            You might consider taking a logic class or two. You could also use an intensive course on the history of Israel (including its founding) and another that examines, in a fair minded manner, the enormous range of views–both religious and political–held by the world’s Muslims.

            I’ve had numerous productive conversations with reasonable and educated conservatives, but Front Page apparently draws an especially noxious segment of the crazies. In any case, I’m not going to bother with you or your extraordinary ignorance. Maybe others here appreciate your rabid responses, but you’re wasting your time if you think I’m reading any of your recent comments.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Through your crazed and obsessive refusal to leave me alone, you have presented yourself to be one of the most unstable and nasty personalities I’ve encountered online–which is saying a LOT.

            Me leave you alone? Yeah right! Don’t look now, but I’m the one who has been responding. As for as the most unstable and nasty personalities go, that gives me a warm and fuzzy feeling all over my body! Thank you, I appreciate that very much. Especially coming from you.

            I’ve sent a link to this page to several people whose judgment I respect, and every one of them has had the same response to your bizarre and badly reasoned “arguments.”

            Yeah I bet. But I hope you did nonetheless.

            Again, your comment was deleted unread. I have the good fortune of being able to discuss topics such as this one with thoughtful people who understand the political and ethical nuances involved, so I refuse to waste my energy on simple-minded extremists like you.

            In other words, if you aren’t a delusional leftwing moonbat, you’re nothing.

            You might consider taking a logic class or two.

            Taught by who? You? Yeah right, so you could inculcate, pollute, and contaminate my mind in order to turn me into an unhinged radical leftwing loon exactly like you? I don’t believe. Indeed, unlike you, I don’t suffer from sadomasochistic tendencies the same way you do.

            You could also use an intensive course on the history of Israel (including its founding) and another that examines, in a fair minded manner, the enormous range of views–both religious and political–held by the world’s Muslims.

            Lady I forgot more about the history of Israel than you will ever come close to knowing. You act like you are the fount of all knowledge are something. Get over yourself.

            I’ve had numerous productive conversations with reasonable and educated conservatives,

            Yeah right, except when you look at your Discus postings, which are wide open for public viewing since you didn’t make them private all you see is you being offended by simple minded and unreasonable conservatives on almost every single post. Damn….you are easily offended lady!

            I’ve had numerous productive conversations with reasonable and educated conservatives,

            Lady, you are reading every last word, because you enjoy the pain and humiliation. You can’t help yourself. Now go fly a kite and see a therapist while you are at it.

          • Laura Runyan

            Your comment was deleted unread. I don’t interact online with people who are hostile, unreasonable, or grossly inaccurate–all of which you were right off the bat. It’s a waste of my time, especially when I can talk with so many others who are better informed and less dogmatic than you.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            You are a sadomasochist, which is why you keep coming back. You enjoy the pain and humiliation.

            Meanwhile, you ignore the fact that Muslims slaughter gays, harshly abuse women, and are perpetrating genocide in Iraq against Christians as I type, as they gave them three options: Either leave, convert to Islam, or die.

            In 2003, there were an estimated 1.5 million Christians living in Iraq that long predate the rise of Islam. Today there are only an estimated 400,000 of them left. They have all since been either killed or ethnically cleansed.

            Yet, according to you, Islam is a so-called “religion of peace”, and the sad part is you are utterly oblivious.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        Yes, fundamentalists can be found in Islam–just as they can be in Judaism and Christianity.

        By the way, just curious, are those Christian and Jewish fundamentalists you are so concerned about also lopping off the heads of infidels that become their captives? Do they also primarily target and murder innocent civilian infidels throughout the world, because slaying innocent civilian infidels in cold blood is the soft underbelly of infidel society? After a great holy war victory, do they also massacre in mass all their infidel captives the same way that the jihadists always traditionally do? Are Christian and Jewish fundamentalists also waging holy wars against all infidels and all infidel states throughout the world to ultimately make their respective religion and respective society supreme above all others throughout the world? Indeed, what infidel states today are the victims of all those Christian and Jewish fundamentalists that are fighting holy wars in the cause of their respective religions? In the Christian/Judeo world, are they also harshly oppressing, kidnapping, raping, and murdering all infidels the same way it is happening throughout the Islamic totalitarian world?

        In any event, whatever it is you are smoking, please send me some. If it’s that good, then I want some. Meanwhile, you sure in the heck know how to denigrate Christians and Jews by claiming that Muslims are just like them and then by equating their faith-based religions with Islam. Wow! That’s a low blow there!

  • Veracious_one

    I bet she doesn’t know much about Islam….

    • Laura Runyan

      For anyone else who might be interested:

      The picture of various Jewish sects in Israel is much more complicated than many Americans realize. For example, Ultra-Orthodox Jewish men protest against feminist Jewish “Women of the Wall”:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2E0KzmDzMxk

      • ObamaYoMoma

        Oh…how horrible that is! Rolls eyes.

        Like I said you are not teaching. You are inculcating, polluting, and contaminating your student’s minds to turn them into mental basket cases exactly like you.

        Meanwhile, at the same time you denigrate Orthodox Jewish males for being orthodox, like a hypocrite you also ignore the fact that practically all Muslim females are sexually mutilated via female genital circumcision, are sold into child sexual slavery, are stoned to death for being raped or for having an affair, have to tolerate multiple marriages, can’t leave their homes unless they are accompanied by a close male relative, can’t drive or work, have to wear head covering, etc., etc., etc. ad nauseum. But that’s all right because they are Muslims. Yeah right.

    • Laura Runyan

      A good share of Israeli Jews and Palestinians support a peaceful two-state solution:

      http://forward.com/articles/201500/families-of-slain-israeli-and-palestinian-teens-tu/

      • ObamaYoMoma

        A good share of Israeli Jews and Palestinians support a peaceful two-state solution:

        In other words, they support the impossible. Only you are too dumb to know it. Moreover, 64 percent of so-called Palestinians support it only as a step in the process to the ultimate destruction of Israel.

        As a matter of fact, according to Islam the only peace that can exist between Muslims and infidels is the peace that comes only after Islam has been made supreme via the imposition of Sharia (Islamic totalitarian law) and only after the infidels have been rendered into Islamic totalitarianism, i.e., harsh and debilitating dhimmitude.

        Meanwhile, in the interim the only agreements that Muslims can make with infidels is a Hudna, which is a kind of truce that Muslims make with infidels that they fully intend to break at some point in the future when they deem the time is right.

        Thus, if Arafat or Abbas made the stupid mistake of signing a permanent peace agreement with Israel, i.e., two states for two people, they would be targeted and assassinated and then the jihad would resume.

        Apparently, this dumb moonbat is a little more than a gullible useful idiot infidel exactly like her idol, John Kerry.

        • Laura Runyan

          Please GO AWAY. I’m not interested in what you have to say on this topic. Your earlier posts show an extraordinary lack of nuance, and they caricature an entire population of people. Therefore, I will NOT read any more of your crass mischaracterizations of Muslims or any other broad class of human beings. LET IT GO.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            You mean like the Jewish males and the Jewish state that you tried to denigrate earlier like the obsessed unhinged bigot that you actually are?

            While at the same time you also totally ignore the harsh reality of not only the way all non-Muslim infidels, including Christians, Jews, Druzes, Baha’is, Buddhists, Hindus, Yazidis, etc., living in the Islamic totalitarian world under harsh Islamic totalitarian rule are subjected to institutional oppression, but also the chronic mistreatment of Muslim females ubiquitous throughout the Islamic totalitarian world as well. All the while you are apologizing and sticking up for Muslims and at the same time proclaiming that everyone who has the audacity to exercise his or her right to free speech to expose the truth and reality about Islam is a bigoted Islamophobe.

            Yeah right lady, go fly a kite! You don’t live in the real world.

          • Laura Runyan

            Someone should be able to disagree with your narrow-minded and hateful opinions without being HARASSED BY YOU. I’m not even reading your later comments because I found your initial ones ugly, bigoted, erroneous, and destructive. What is wrong with you, that you would continue bothering someone who clearly doesn’t want any further interaction with you?

            “Harassment usually involves repeated communications via email or some sort of instant messaging program after the harasser has clearly been told to go away” (http://www.haltabuse.org/help/isit.shtml).

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Hey moonbat, take your meds. It’s me responding to you, not the other way around. So give up on your little immature transparent and absurd game. Now I told you to go fly a kite. Go fly a kite loon. Take my advice, go fly a kite and see a therapists while your at it.

          • Veracious_one
      • Veracious_one

        Palestinians do not support a two state solution, they never have, http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2013/01/08/pat-condell-on-israel-and-palestine/comment-page-1/

        • Laura Runyan

          This thread is really making me wonder about the quality of much American education these days. You just made a UNIVERSAL claim about Palestinians without providing a single CREDIBLE source. Instead, you’ve linked to a site that consists primarily of PROPAGANDA on the subject of Palestinians in Gaza. Nothing about the author’s educational background lends credence to his PERSONAL OPINIONS about Palestinians; his scientific background is irrelevant to his personal POLITICAL views on the matter.

          Or were you merely making a GROSS GENERALIZATION? Palestinians don’t support a two-state solution and “never have”? How many Palestinians are you referring to here? All? Most? Some?

          Many of the Palestinians in Gaza have serious misgivings about Hamas. But then, if you’re going to rely only on seriously biased sources of “information,” how would you even know that? Why not turn to legitimate educational or news sources instead of the personal opinions of those who agree with you?

          I think we should start requiring all undergraduate students to take at least one basic logic course before they graduate. In fact, it’d be even better were it to begin in high school.

          Well, the result of a survey done by Hebrew University disagree with your universal (?)/grossly generalizing (?) statement. Perhaps you should considfi nd more credible sources

          • ObamaYoMoma

            I hate to keep trouncing all over your clueless useful idiot parade dummy, but this conflict has never ever been about so-called “occupation”, although that is the pretext. Instead, what is happening in Israel is the Islamic totalitarian world through their proxy – the so-called Palestinians, is waging a jihad perpetually against the infidels in Israel.

            In addition, that jihad is just a tiny part of the much greater global jihad at large that the Islamic totalitarian world is waging around the world against all infidels, (including you, only you are too stupid to realize it), and all infidel states throughout the world.

            Hence, it is impossible for Israel and, for that matter, all other infidel states as well to stop the jihad from being waged against them individually alone. As a matter of fact, the only solution is for the collective infidel world at large to unite to act cooperatively as one to put an end to the global jihad at large.

            The only other alternative, otherwise, is to learn to live with jihad being waged perpetually against all infidels and all infidel states throughout the world.

          • Veracious_one

            It has taken quite a while. It still is not understood by many, and among those many are many in Israel, who simply do not want to understand how badly they have for so long misunderstood, the war being waged against them. For too many of them, it is an upsetting idea. They can’t quite grasp, because they would dearly prefer not to grasp, that the war against Israel has no end, so further Israeli concessions and at this point irrational sweet-reasonableness will only weaken Israel, and thus, by the logic of Islam, make it more not less likely that Muslims will attack the Infidel nation-state. Nor should much significance be given to the war, for power and loot, between the two factions Hamas and Fatah. They agree completely on the goal, and the end result. But the Slow Jihadists of Fatah, being more corrupt, and thus more immediately desirous of Western aid, and being more patient and cunning as well, because less heedlessly fanatical, differ only in tactics and in timing from the Fast Jihadists of Hamas, who in any case may themselves be becoming, just a little, more pragmatic, which naturally draws them closer to the Slow Jihadists of Fatah.

            But the Slow Jihadists and the Fast Jihadists simply underline the main and obvious point, which nonetheless must be restated as often as possible: The war against Israel waged by Muslim Arabs and other Muslims who follow the Arab lead is merely a classic Jihad. After the Six-Day War, the Arabs made every effort, because they realized that a military “solution” was not at hand, to repackage their opposition to Israel. They would use the fact of Israel’s victory against it. Among the territories that Israel took possession of were two — Gaza and the “West Bank” — to which Israel had good, even clear, title according to all the legal and historic (not to mention moral claims) — which were soon re-presented to the world as the land of a suddenly-invented “Palestinian people,” (never mentioned before by any Arab rulers, diplomats, historians, or others), and the careful fabrication continued as part of the so-called “construction-of-the-Palestinian-identity” project, right down to the renaming of a few banal Arab folkdances as “Palestinian” in nature. For the Arabs have always been very clever about manipulating the Western publics, while Israel has endured a political and media elite that takes pride in its absence of guile, its blunt forthrightness, save that the blunt forthrightness of Golda Meir’s dismissal of the “Palestinian people” did not continue, and the Israelis became unwitting collaborators in their own propagandistic degringolade.

            The Arabs understood, after the colossal defeat of June 1967, that they would need more time, and other strategies, to defeat and then destroy Israel. They realized that they would need the outside world, and particularly the Western powers that had affinities with, and even gave moral and sometimes other kinds of support to Israel, to take the Arab and Muslim side. They worked hard to make sure that those Western powers, little by little, stopped seeing the conflict as what it was, but as something else, in which tiny Israel could be depicted as the o’erweening bully, and the Arab side depicted as the much weaker victims.

            Considering that the Arabs alone outnumber the Jews of Israel 60 to one, and that the land in the possession of the Arabs is about 14 million square miles, while Israel in the 1949 armistice lines is about 10,000 square miles, and even with the “West Bank” does not even contain the 14,000 square miles that would make Mighty Israel, Greater Israel, all of one-one-thousandth the size of the Arab-ruled lands (where Berbers, Kurds, Copts, and all other non-Arab or non-Muslim peoples, are treated with contumely, or discrimination, or persecution, or worse), this was a neat trick.

            But the Arabs managed it. They began by carefully renaming the Arabs in the territories won by Israel in the Six-Day War as the “Palestinian people,” a phrase not used, not once, by any Arab diplomat or leader prior to the Six-Day War. Thus a new “people” was created — see Zuhair Mohsain’s admission to the Dutch newspaper “Trouw” about the propagandistic motivation for the “Palestinian people”:

            The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct “Palestinian people” to oppose Zionism..

            For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa,, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan.

            But then the Israelis, so desperately eager for peace, failed to respond. They failed utterly to recognize the propagandistic case that was being built, by which the Jihad against the Infidel state of Israel was to be disguised as merely a conflict between two “tiny peoples” (though the Arabs never hide the fact that they consider themselves one people, a people united in language, customs, religion, and all the other outward and inward markers of ethnic identity).

            In this scenario, Israel was cast in the role of bullying “occupier.” In reality, it was no such thing, for its historic and legal claim to the “West Bank” did not begin with, and was not dependent on, the possession that resulted from the Six-Day War. For Israel’s “occupation” of territory deliberately set aside for the Jewish National Home according to the League of Nations’ Mandate for Palestine could hardly be seen as similar, say, to “Occupied Paris” (to which the Germans had no legitimate claim) or “Occupied Vienna” or “Occupied Berlin” (both cities which the Allies occupied with military forces after the war, but to which they did not have, and did not wish to fabricate, any kind of permanent claim). The same goes, of course, for “Occupied Japan,” to which the Americans of course had no claim other than of being military occupier. That is quite different from Israel, which in the Six-Day War came into possession of territory to which it had a claim, and a right — legal, historic, and moral — recognized by those who established the Mandate system after World War I.

            The Arabs have had a good run, aided and abetted by a series of mediocre Israeli governments, and by media and political elites in Israel largely ignorant of Islam, almost willfully so, and thus blind to the war being waged, for all time, against the state of Israel. Perhaps to allow themselves to understand the nature of Islam, and thus to recognize the endless nature of the war being waged on Israel, has simply been too painful for Israelis to face up to. So instead they — like the Western Europeans — simply prefer to deny it all, and thus to end up collaborating with the propaganda put out by their enemies, aiding those enemies to conceal the nature of the war being waged.

            But now, it seems, each new killing or attack, in Madrid or London or Mumbai, in Amsterdam or New York, in Washington or New Delhi, in Moscow or Manila, in southern Thailand or in southern Nigeria or in southern Sudan, of Muslims against Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, and all others, chips away at that Arab propaganda, and begins to allow us once again to see, revealed, the true nature of the war against Israel. As this war is seen, and seen more clearly, soonest by the keenest, and then afterwards by the less keen, it will be harder and harder for the farce of the “legitimate rights of the ‘Palestinian’ people” business to be uttered with a straight face. And if Israel can hold on, and can start to see things straight, and help others in Western Europe and North America, by making its own new understanding of things clear, to themselves come to grasp the meaning, and permanent menace, of Islam, then it is just possible that Israel will have a chance. Further appeasement will not and cannot work. Islam is triumphalist. Every victory, anywhere, against any Infidels, only whets, and never sates, Muslim appetites. This needs to be understood. Not after the next concession of tangible assets to the Arabs, but before any more such disastrous concessions, by the likes of the olmerts of this world, are made.

            Israel consists of several countries. One of those countries is the one in which an Olmert can compare the justified fury of Jewish villagers in Kiryat Arba who have been goaded by the local Arabs beyond endurance to a “pogrom.” In that country, Ha’aretz columnists, aided by Israelis who control the radio and television, can consistently and deliberately avoid all mention of the texts and tenets of Islam, and blithely describe a “peace” that they think can be established if, and only if, Israel continues to make tangible concessions, as it has been making to the Arabs and Muslims ever since the 1948-49 war, though every single resulting agreement or, if not agreement, then assurances by an Arab state — e.g., Nasser’s Egypt to the “international community” in order to get back the Sinai, has in one way or another ultimately been breached by the Arab side.

            And those breaches have been so continuous, so systematic, and so blatant, that one might have thought that some people in the Israeli government, as well as some in the Foreign Ministry, and some in the Israeli media would have begun to ask if perhaps the problem was not with this or that country or leader with whom the treaties were contracted, but rather with some underlying theory concerning the observance of treaties in Islam – a theory that had little to do with the “Pacta Sunt Servanda” (treaties are to be obeyed) principles that underlie the Western understanding, and Western assumptions, about treaties.

            And if those in Israel’s political and media elites had done what should have been the most obvious thing in the world, which is to say, if they had begun to study the law of war and peace in Islam, perhaps by beginning with Majid Khadduri’s book War and Peace In the Law of Islam, then the members of those elites — the Ha’aretz columnists, in all their baseless and smug self-assurance, and the political figures who meet with their approval, and the television wise men — would have had to recognize some uncomfortable truths. They would have had to come to grips with those truths, and would have had to come to formulate or support policies that were based not on the notion that Pacta Sunt Servanda would prevail, but on the truth: that no Arab Muslim state is ever going to reconcile itself to the existence of the Infidel nation-state of Israel, no matter what its size. They would have had to recognize also that Israeli policies for maintaining “peace” are futile. Such a “peace” is maintained right now by the threat of what the Israeli Defense Force can do to those who make war on Israel, and that is the only long-term “peace” that Israel can ever rely on. Israel must come to realize that it certainly cannot rely on a “peace” that depends on the Arab Muslims ignoring their own texts, tenets, attitudes, and their own insistence that the basis for their treaty-making with Infidels must remain the model of Muhammad’s treaty with the Meccans in 628 A.D. at Hudaibiyya. After concluding that treaty for a period of ten years, Muhammad, that Model of Conduct (uswa hasana) and Perfect Man (al-insan al-kamil), soon found a pretext to breach it, and within 18 months did so. And he has been hailed for his cunning in deceiving the enemy — hailed in Muslim texts — ever since, and Muslims have no other model for treaty-making with Infidels, nor do they wish one.

            One way that those who presume to inform and instruct us could and should promote greater clarity in discussions about the Arab Muslim war on Israel is to do the following: every time the word “peace” is written, instead let the phrase “peace treaty” appear. That will do a great deal. And if, every time that phrase “peace treaty” now appears, the phrase “truce treaty” were to be substituted instead, for it is indeed only a hudna, a “truce treaty,” that would make things even clearer. And isn’t clarity important? Isn’t an absence of confusion a good idea, whether one is buying a toaster, or betting the future existence of an entire state and an entire people, on the right understanding of things?

        • Laura Runyan

          And of course, responses to surveys such as the one below can change along with changes in the political climate. My brother has his PhD in mathematical statistics and is well familiar with some of the problems inherent in many types of survey questions, but one doesn’t need a doctorate in statistics to realize that the way the survey questions are worded and then analyzed can make an enormous difference in the results.

          And strongly partisan sources–right OR left–are highly questionable sources for information about controversial political issues.

          The split among Palestinians regarding a two-state solution (so I guess it’s NOT all Palestinians!):

          http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/19/world/middleeast/a-divide-among-palestinians-on-a-two-state-solution.html?_r=0

          I have other things to do now, so I don’t have the rest of the evening to link to multiple sources on this topic, but I’ll contend that the issue is far more complex than any blanket statement about what Palestinians (all, most, some??) support or oppose.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            The NY Slimes? Really? You call them credible? They have about as much credibility as Electricintafada.net has when it comes to Israel.

            In any event, what about the Washington Institute for Near East policy, which is a moderate middle of the road think-tank based in Washington DC? Do they have cred?

            The Washington Institute for Near East Policy recently commissioned a survey of Arabs in the West Bank and Gaza. The results prove yet again that Palestinian Arab attitudes towards Israel are anything but peaceful.

            64% say that after a peace deal is signed with Israel, “resistance should continue until all of historic Palestine is liberated.” And 65% say that the Palestinian Arab leadership agrees; that any negotiated solution “would be part of a ‘program of stages,’ to liberate all of historic Palestine later.”

            This is about as explicit as can be. The conventional wisdom that a majority of Palestinian Arabs want a permanent peace with Israel is a baseless myth. It is based on flawed surveys which do not list the alternative of an Arab-only state from the river to the sea.

            http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/64-of-palestinian-arabs-believe-the-two-state-solution-is-a-prelude-to-destroying-israel/

          • Veracious_one

            The survey never names any names in this story . Why? That would be political suicide for Palestinian politicians — and quite possibly lethal in the literal sense as well. one need only remember that Hamas maintains its determination to destroy Israel, and even “moderate” Fatah has reaffirmed armed struggle as an option. The putative presence of “democracy” alone does not ensure human rights and civil liberties. Just ask the Iranians. Or Afghan Shi’ite women. Or, stay local and ask the democratically elected Hamas officials.

        • Laura Runyan

          One more: In 2009, Palestinians overwhelmingly supported a two-state solution (so really, they “never have”?). There’s been a backslide since then (Netanyahu hasn’t been consistently popular among his fellow Israeli Jews, let alone among Palestinians); support among Palestinians will probably climb again if this current conflict doesn’t get too out of hand.

          From an Israeli newspaper I frequently read online:

          http://www.haaretz.com/news/poll-most-palestinians-israelis-want-two-state-solution-1.274607

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Haaretz…yeah right. You are, indeed, exceedingly delusional. Credible? You wouldn’t know credible even if it stared you in the face and spit in your eye. You are one myopic very narrow-minded lady. You need to learn to take off the blinders and open your eyes.