<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White House Memo Blaming Video was Sent to Muslim Brotherhood Operative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 20:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative/comment-page-1/#comment-5411147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224739#comment-5411147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;You blathered ad nauseam from some readily available sources in your interminable attempt at refuting Emerson, or anyone who exposes Islam, yet you cited no sources. What were they?&quot;

If you have a specific question, I can offer a specific answer.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You blathered ad nauseam from some readily available sources in your interminable attempt at refuting Emerson, or anyone who exposes Islam, yet you cited no sources. What were they?&#8221;</p>
<p>If you have a specific question, I can offer a specific answer.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative/comment-page-1/#comment-5411146</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224739#comment-5411146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You really are having difficulty with this, aren&#039;t you?

When you make an assertion and support it by saying &quot;Google it,&quot; that&#039;s like waving your hand in the direction of a library and saying &quot;my evidence is in there, go find it yourself.&quot;

When you say &quot;google term X,&quot; you,ve waved your hand in the direction of the card catalogue and said &quot;use that to help you find it.&quot;

The obvious failure in both cases is that it is the speaker, not the listener, who not only bears the responsibility for supporting his own assertion, but who presumably has some idea of what source, if any, he had in mind.  It&#039;s not my responsibility to look at 300 pages of returns and to guess which sources, and which information in those sources, you consider relevant to supporting your position.

If you believe that the net is awash in corroborating information, such that a &quot;quick search&quot; would include many applicable returns, then it is simplicity itself for you to run the search yourself, identify one that you know to be appropriate for your purposes, and link that in your post.  Then we both know exactly what you mean, instead of playing this sort of child&#039;s guessing game.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really are having difficulty with this, aren&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>When you make an assertion and support it by saying &#8220;Google it,&#8221; that&#8217;s like waving your hand in the direction of a library and saying &#8220;my evidence is in there, go find it yourself.&#8221;</p>
<p>When you say &#8220;google term X,&#8221; you,ve waved your hand in the direction of the card catalogue and said &#8220;use that to help you find it.&#8221;</p>
<p>The obvious failure in both cases is that it is the speaker, not the listener, who not only bears the responsibility for supporting his own assertion, but who presumably has some idea of what source, if any, he had in mind.  It&#8217;s not my responsibility to look at 300 pages of returns and to guess which sources, and which information in those sources, you consider relevant to supporting your position.</p>
<p>If you believe that the net is awash in corroborating information, such that a &#8220;quick search&#8221; would include many applicable returns, then it is simplicity itself for you to run the search yourself, identify one that you know to be appropriate for your purposes, and link that in your post.  Then we both know exactly what you mean, instead of playing this sort of child&#8217;s guessing game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative/comment-page-1/#comment-5411128</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224739#comment-5411128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re barking up the wrong tree.  The issue isn&#039;t simply the credibility of the evidence, it&#039;s the absence of evidence that extends the relationship from overlapping membership to &quot;front.&quot;  I invite your attention to my American Legion example if you are struggling with the idea.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re barking up the wrong tree.  The issue isn&#8217;t simply the credibility of the evidence, it&#8217;s the absence of evidence that extends the relationship from overlapping membership to &#8220;front.&#8221;  I invite your attention to my American Legion example if you are struggling with the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative/comment-page-1/#comment-5411126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224739#comment-5411126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Why don&#039;t you provide a list of Muslim groups who don&#039;t share the same goals?&quot;

Now you&#039;re starting to get it.  Follow that line of reasoning to its logical conclusion.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why don&#8217;t you provide a list of Muslim groups who don&#8217;t share the same goals?&#8221;</p>
<p>Now you&#8217;re starting to get it.  Follow that line of reasoning to its logical conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative/comment-page-1/#comment-5411122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 17:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224739#comment-5411122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re letting your penchant for hysteria and hyperbole interfere with your thinking.  Noting that either set of circumstances constitutes &quot;bombing&quot; in no way suggests that one cannot find any differences in those circumstances.  What is in question is not whether Mr. Shoebat&#039;s actions are indistinguishable from other terrorist acts, but whether the action is properly described as a &quot;bombing.&quot;

One suspects that if a member of the Muslim Brothers were to change the point of aim of an explosive in mid-attack in a similar manner, say, in Boston, you would be scandalized if I tried to insist that he had not committed a bombing, and you would be lecturing me on my lack of moral clarity for trying to excuse him. 

&quot; I&#039;m not surprised that you can&#039;t understand the difference.&quot; 

You would have to show some understanding of what you read before your capacity or incapacity for surprise would mean something.  In the same post you&#039;ve introduced an irrelevant distinction, then concluded that the absence of that irrelevancy in a prior post indicates an inability to &quot;understand.&quot;  One trusts that you understand how utterly inane such posturing is?

So you &quot;suspect&quot; I&#039;d place highly on the sociopathic scale, do you?  Are you a mental health professional, or is this just another example of you confusing your (highly) emotionally responses with actual knowledge and analysis?  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re letting your penchant for hysteria and hyperbole interfere with your thinking.  Noting that either set of circumstances constitutes &#8220;bombing&#8221; in no way suggests that one cannot find any differences in those circumstances.  What is in question is not whether Mr. Shoebat&#8217;s actions are indistinguishable from other terrorist acts, but whether the action is properly described as a &#8220;bombing.&#8221;</p>
<p>One suspects that if a member of the Muslim Brothers were to change the point of aim of an explosive in mid-attack in a similar manner, say, in Boston, you would be scandalized if I tried to insist that he had not committed a bombing, and you would be lecturing me on my lack of moral clarity for trying to excuse him. </p>
<p>&#8221; I&#8217;m not surprised that you can&#8217;t understand the difference.&#8221; </p>
<p>You would have to show some understanding of what you read before your capacity or incapacity for surprise would mean something.  In the same post you&#8217;ve introduced an irrelevant distinction, then concluded that the absence of that irrelevancy in a prior post indicates an inability to &#8220;understand.&#8221;  One trusts that you understand how utterly inane such posturing is?</p>
<p>So you &#8220;suspect&#8221; I&#8217;d place highly on the sociopathic scale, do you?  Are you a mental health professional, or is this just another example of you confusing your (highly) emotionally responses with actual knowledge and analysis?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative/comment-page-1/#comment-5411098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224739#comment-5411098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speculation doesn&#039;t become fact by employing caps lock.  If there was a conspiracy to obscure truth, it isn&#039;t demonstrated by the Rhodes email.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speculation doesn&#8217;t become fact by employing caps lock.  If there was a conspiracy to obscure truth, it isn&#8217;t demonstrated by the Rhodes email.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cacslewisfan</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative/comment-page-1/#comment-5410921</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cacslewisfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 12:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224739#comment-5410921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am shocked!  Obama partners with the Muslim Brotherhood?  Hmmm, maybe that explains why he invited the outlawed MB to his speech in Cairo.  Someone should tell him the MB manifesto: 
  &quot;Muslims “must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad: in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within; and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands, and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions...It is a Muslim’s destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny....”]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am shocked!  Obama partners with the Muslim Brotherhood?  Hmmm, maybe that explains why he invited the outlawed MB to his speech in Cairo.  Someone should tell him the MB manifesto:<br />
  &#8220;Muslims “must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad: in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within; and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands, and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions&#8230;It is a Muslim’s destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny&#8230;.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative/comment-page-1/#comment-5410809</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 04:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224739#comment-5410809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your lack of moral clarity makes it difficult for you to differentiate between psychopaths who kill children with no pangs of conscience and those who abort violence because of said pangs. I&#039;m not surprised that you can&#039;t understand the difference. Whether via genetics or indoctrination, I suspect that you would score magnificently on the sociopathic scale.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your lack of moral clarity makes it difficult for you to differentiate between psychopaths who kill children with no pangs of conscience and those who abort violence because of said pangs. I&#8217;m not surprised that you can&#8217;t understand the difference. Whether via genetics or indoctrination, I suspect that you would score magnificently on the sociopathic scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative/comment-page-1/#comment-5410808</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 04:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224739#comment-5410808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are interested in keeping people&#039;s awareness away from the FACT that the Obama administration had a Muslim Brotherhood operative in a high level communication loop that was conspiring to obscure the truth about Benghazi.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are interested in keeping people&#8217;s awareness away from the FACT that the Obama administration had a Muslim Brotherhood operative in a high level communication loop that was conspiring to obscure the truth about Benghazi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative/comment-page-1/#comment-5410807</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 04:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224739#comment-5410807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know how to filter truth to make things look the way you want them to. I&#039;ve seldom run in to anyone as gifted at obscuring the truth. That isn&#039;t a compliment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know how to filter truth to make things look the way you want them to. I&#8217;ve seldom run in to anyone as gifted at obscuring the truth. That isn&#8217;t a compliment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative/comment-page-1/#comment-5410806</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 04:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224739#comment-5410806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was an idiotic reply. You are attempting  an equivalency that simply isn&#039;t there. Without defining &quot;quick&quot; your reply makes no sense, but don&#039;t bother, it still wouldn&#039;t make any.


You blathered ad nauseam from some readily available sources in your interminable attempt at refuting Emerson, or anyone who exposes Islam, yet you cited no sources. What were they?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was an idiotic reply. You are attempting  an equivalency that simply isn&#8217;t there. Without defining &#8220;quick&#8221; your reply makes no sense, but don&#8217;t bother, it still wouldn&#8217;t make any.</p>
<p>You blathered ad nauseam from some readily available sources in your interminable attempt at refuting Emerson, or anyone who exposes Islam, yet you cited no sources. What were they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative/comment-page-1/#comment-5410799</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 04:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224739#comment-5410799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What constitutes proof for you? Signed confessions? You&#039;d claim they were coerced. Video, witnesses, and intercepted directives from the Muslim Brotherhood to MSA? You&#039;d claim the video was edited, the witnesses were paid, and the intercepted directives were illegally acquired.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What constitutes proof for you? Signed confessions? You&#8217;d claim they were coerced. Video, witnesses, and intercepted directives from the Muslim Brotherhood to MSA? You&#8217;d claim the video was edited, the witnesses were paid, and the intercepted directives were illegally acquired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative/comment-page-1/#comment-5410798</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 04:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224739#comment-5410798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Overlapping membership strongly implies that the goals of the MSA would be compatible with those of the MB.&quot;


They are. They are both Muslim advocacy groups and Islam is political religion bent on world domination. They obviously share the same goals. 


Why don&#039;t you provide a list of Muslim groups who don&#039;t share the same goals? 


Emerson isn&#039;t reliable as a source because you reduce his work to &quot;spinning conspiracies?&quot; This is so typical of your obscurantist tactics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Overlapping membership strongly implies that the goals of the MSA would be compatible with those of the MB.&#8221;</p>
<p>They are. They are both Muslim advocacy groups and Islam is political religion bent on world domination. They obviously share the same goals. </p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you provide a list of Muslim groups who don&#8217;t share the same goals? </p>
<p>Emerson isn&#8217;t reliable as a source because you reduce his work to &#8220;spinning conspiracies?&#8221; This is so typical of your obscurantist tactics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DogmaelJones1</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative/comment-page-1/#comment-5410785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DogmaelJones1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 03:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224739#comment-5410785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is doubtful, Steve Emerson focusing his researching efforts on Clive Bundy. Emerson&#039;s patch is Islam, not domestic issues, except when Islam and the Brotherhood impinge on domestic issues. But I&#039;d bet Emerson would be on Bundy&#039;s side. If he turned to Clive Bundy, he&#039;d likely investigate that other big terrorist outfit, the U.S. government.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is doubtful, Steve Emerson focusing his researching efforts on Clive Bundy. Emerson&#8217;s patch is Islam, not domestic issues, except when Islam and the Brotherhood impinge on domestic issues. But I&#8217;d bet Emerson would be on Bundy&#8217;s side. If he turned to Clive Bundy, he&#8217;d likely investigate that other big terrorist outfit, the U.S. government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative/comment-page-1/#comment-5410784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 03:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224739#comment-5410784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;What kind of reasoning would you call the dismissal of various sites based on merely mentioning their names?&quot;

The kind of reasoning that suggests &quot;a quick search..is all one needs to confirm...&quot; is not all that one needs to confirm.

If you have a source you wish to offer, then offer it.  If you don&#039;t wish to provide a source, it&#039;s unclear why you are agonizing over its dismissal.  

&quot;They call that laughable in intelligence circles.&quot;


That was rather my point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What kind of reasoning would you call the dismissal of various sites based on merely mentioning their names?&#8221;</p>
<p>The kind of reasoning that suggests &#8220;a quick search..is all one needs to confirm&#8230;&#8221; is not all that one needs to confirm.</p>
<p>If you have a source you wish to offer, then offer it.  If you don&#8217;t wish to provide a source, it&#8217;s unclear why you are agonizing over its dismissal.  </p>
<p>&#8220;They call that laughable in intelligence circles.&#8221;</p>
<p>That was rather my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative/comment-page-1/#comment-5410778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 02:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224739#comment-5410778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did I say google was a source? I used &quot;google&quot; as a verb.


Your MO is to find fault with any source, regardless of the truth it reports. You can&#039;t refute it, so you denigrate it. 


What kind of reasoning would you call the dismissal of various sites based on merely mentioning their names? Is that how you impeach a source? They call that laughable in intelligence circles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did I say google was a source? I used &#8220;google&#8221; as a verb.</p>
<p>Your MO is to find fault with any source, regardless of the truth it reports. You can&#8217;t refute it, so you denigrate it. </p>
<p>What kind of reasoning would you call the dismissal of various sites based on merely mentioning their names? Is that how you impeach a source? They call that laughable in intelligence circles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative/comment-page-1/#comment-5410769</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 02:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224739#comment-5410769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m interested in understanding how &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; suppose them to differ.  I mean that quite exactly; that&#039;s not a left-handed way of saying &quot;I think they&#039;re the same.&quot;  I&#039;d really like to hear what you understand this site to be in contrast to what you understand WND to be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m interested in understanding how <i>you</i> suppose them to differ.  I mean that quite exactly; that&#8217;s not a left-handed way of saying &#8220;I think they&#8217;re the same.&#8221;  I&#8217;d really like to hear what you understand this site to be in contrast to what you understand WND to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NAHALKIDES</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative/comment-page-1/#comment-5410766</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NAHALKIDES]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 02:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224739#comment-5410766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s been well-established for years that the MSA is MB front group.  It&#039;s not necessary to re-invent the wheel in every article and re-establish the relationship between the MSA and MB.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been well-established for years that the MSA is MB front group.  It&#8217;s not necessary to re-invent the wheel in every article and re-establish the relationship between the MSA and MB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative/comment-page-1/#comment-5410767</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 02:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224739#comment-5410767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;He didn&#039;t claim to have bombed the bank. He claimed that he discarded an
 explosive device of some sort on the bank&#039;s roof where it harmlessly 
detonated.&quot;

He claimed that he had the bomb ready to throw through the bank&#039;s door, saw Arab children at play and suffered a crisis of conscience, and threw the bomb on the roof instead, where it exploded.  

If one throws a bomb at a building, and that bomb explodes, it would be interesting to understand in what way, exactly, he had not bombed that building.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He didn&#8217;t claim to have bombed the bank. He claimed that he discarded an<br />
 explosive device of some sort on the bank&#8217;s roof where it harmlessly<br />
detonated.&#8221;</p>
<p>He claimed that he had the bomb ready to throw through the bank&#8217;s door, saw Arab children at play and suffered a crisis of conscience, and threw the bomb on the roof instead, where it exploded.  </p>
<p>If one throws a bomb at a building, and that bomb explodes, it would be interesting to understand in what way, exactly, he had not bombed that building.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/white-house-memo-blaming-video-was-sent-to-muslim-brotherhood-operative/comment-page-1/#comment-5410762</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 02:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=224739#comment-5410762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The material is based in part on evidence submitted in court cases and seized in raids.&quot;

And in part it&#039;s not.

&quot;The MSA&#039;s MB links are one of the least controversial Counterjihad items.&quot;

I&#039;m not too concerned about what&#039;s controversial in Emerson&#039;s circles, but you could stand to read a bit more closely.  I&#039;m challenging your claim that MSA is a front, not your claim that many members of MSA were also members of MB at some point.

It may be a front, but you&#039;ve yet to show it.


&quot;That&#039;s it for me.&quot;

And?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The material is based in part on evidence submitted in court cases and seized in raids.&#8221;</p>
<p>And in part it&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>&#8220;The MSA&#8217;s MB links are one of the least controversial Counterjihad items.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not too concerned about what&#8217;s controversial in Emerson&#8217;s circles, but you could stand to read a bit more closely.  I&#8217;m challenging your claim that MSA is a front, not your claim that many members of MSA were also members of MB at some point.</p>
<p>It may be a front, but you&#8217;ve yet to show it.</p>
<p>&#8220;That&#8217;s it for me.&#8221;</p>
<p>And?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 804/868 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 15:35:01 by W3 Total Cache -->